IQPC February 25, 20041 ELECTRONIC RECORDS INTEGRITY AND AUTHENTICITY AND STANDARDS OF EVIDENCE John...
-
Upload
theodora-lynch -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of IQPC February 25, 20041 ELECTRONIC RECORDS INTEGRITY AND AUTHENTICITY AND STANDARDS OF EVIDENCE John...
IQPC February 25, 2004 1
ELECTRONIC RECORDS
INTEGRITY AND AUTHENTICITY
AND
STANDARDS OF EVIDENCE
John D. GregoryMinistry of the Attorney General (Ontario)
IQPC February 25, 2004 2
Integrity and authenticity
What are they? Why do you care?
for business reasons have to trust your records
for legal reasons others may have to trust them
IQPC February 25, 2004 3
The legal reasons
administrative – a government department (such as the tax people) wants to see them
regulatory – a public agency (such as the Securities Commission) wants to see them
judicial – they are needed for a court case
IQPC February 25, 2004 4
Judicial reasons - Court rules We focus on court rules here because:
they are a general standard – not specific to an agency
they are a single standard – not multiple as with agencies
their standard influences others’ rules Note on Audit Standards
See later discussion by Brian Ludmer CICA has information security audit
standard
IQPC February 25, 2004 5
The Law of Evidence in a (small) nutshell
Admissibility vs weight: for courts, most of discussion
touches the former for agencies and regulators, will
affect the latter
IQPC February 25, 2004 6
The Law of Evidence in a (small) nutshel l
the “normal” rule: oral evidence, under oath, subject to cross-examination
but: lots of exceptions notable exception: documents
“documentary evidence” includes papers, pictures, audio and videotapes, and contents of computers
IQPC February 25, 2004 7
The Law of Evidence in a (small) nutshel l
Criteria for admission of documentary evidence: authentic – the record is what it purports to be best evidence – an original, or an explanation not hearsay (a content rule not a form rule)
reliable and necessary business records rule statutory records rules
Ontario Evidence Act, Canada Evidence Act
IQPC February 25, 2004 8
The Law of Evidence in a (small) nutshel l
Electronic documents – how does this change? Authenticity: basic rule is OK – document supported
by live witness – but e-documents are more subject to manipulation (sometimes). May be hard on a challenge.
Original (best evidence): may be meaningless for electronic document. Changed by legislation from a record-based test to a system-based test
Hearsay: no change in principle – because content does not change with the medium. Still OCB test.
IQPC February 25, 2004 9
The Law of Evidence in a (small) nutshel l
In practice: Electronic records get admitted readily Everyone knows records are made on
computers “Notice to admit” procedure – know
ahead of time Risk (in costs) of objecting on speculation
IQPC February 25, 2004 10
The Law of Evidence in a (small) nutshel l
BUT If there is a serious dispute, how do
you defend your records? How do you demonstrate authenticity,
originality? SO
Legislation to help answer these questions.
IQPC February 25, 2004 11
The Legislation
Uniform Electronic Evidence Act (federal government, 6 provinces incl. Ontario + Yukon)
Ontario Evidence Act s. 34.1 (2000) Canada Evidence Act s. 31.1 – 31.8 Quebec – distinct (Civil Code and
special Act)
IQPC February 25, 2004 12
The Legislation
The key to the legislation: system integrity general application: the best evidence
rule – no original needed In addition: any evidence
supporting system integrity may be used to support admissibility
IQPC February 25, 2004 13
The Legislation To ease admission, the law provides
presumptions that the record-keeping system has integrity: for one’s own computer, OK if one can show
the computer was working fine all the time, or if it wasn’t, the problem did not affect the
integrity of the record-keeping system for a record from an adverse party’s computer,
OK (since the other party knows more about it) for a record from an independent third party, OK
if kept in the ordinary course of business
IQPC February 25, 2004 14
The Legislation AND if the presumption is rebutted, so one has to
show the integrity of a record-keeping system:For the purposes of determining under any rule of law whether an electronic record is admissible, evidence may be presented in respect of any standard, procedure, usage or practice on how electronic records are to be recorded or stored, having regard to the type of business or endeavour that used, recorded or stored the electronic record and the nature and purpose of the electronic record.
(UEEA s. 6)
IQPC February 25, 2004 15
The Legislation Standards may be of variable degrees of
formality (official, semi-official, private) applicability (sectoral, record-type) generality (could be bilateral agreement)
Proof that the presumptions apply or that standards are complied with may be by affidavit of a person with knowledge of the record-keeping practices of the party that wants to produce the record in evidence. The person should be available for cross-
examination.
IQPC February 25, 2004 16
Standards Canadian General Standards Board part of Public Works Canada
Microfilm as documentary evidence (1988) Microfilm and electronic imaging … (1993) Electronic records as documentary evidence
(2004) – in the final stages of adoption And still to come
Electronic Signatures Codes for retention and disposition of e-records Long term preservation of digital information
IQPC February 25, 2004 17
Standards
Legal effect of a Standard The standard is itself not a law, it is a guideline. Compliance with the standard is not mandatory. Compliance with the standard is a kind of safe
harbour, not a guarantee of any legal result. The standard is a statement of best practices. The Evidence Act says a court “may consider”
compliance with the standard – if a party asks.
IQPC February 25, 2004 18
Standards But
The standard is written in mandatory language – the Person “shall” do X and Y.
If you say you comply and do not, there may be civil and regulatory consequences for misrepresentation.
Sometimes compliance is given an advantage, e.g. the law of evidence, the tax authorities (for the CGSB imaging standard).
IQPC February 25, 2004 19
Standards The standard could become a common-law
standard of prudent behaviour, so that failure to comply could be found to be negligence.
The standard could be adopted in legislation or regulations and made mandatory for some sectors or some purposes. (e.g. Canadian Standards Association or Underwriters’ Laboratories for electrical goods)
The legal effects may be indirect or private (e.g. give an ability to prove reliability of records)
IQPC February 25, 2004 20
The CGSB Standard and you The key rule of the Standard: think about it! In other words:
Make a policy about how e-records are managed
Communicate the policy Implement the policy Monitor compliance with the policy Adjust the policy as required by circumstances
Have a policy manual that you can point to. Have someone responsible (CRO) (+ witness)
IQPC February 25, 2004 21
The CGSB Standard and you
Characteristics of the Standard: high level language
it applies to lots of records it applies to lots of record-keepers
question: small and medium-sized enterprises technology neutral
it is flexible in its application now it is adaptable to evolution of technology it does not make business choices for its users
IQPC February 25, 2004 22
The CGSB Standard and you
Complying with the Standard Authorization:
senior management have to buy in formally someone is put in charge responsibilities apply even if outsourced work the policy is documented, changes are documented
Electronic Records Management Program Policy” “closely aligned” with the information management
security policy
IQPC February 25, 2004 23
The CGSB Standard and you Policy contains statements on, among other
things, data file formats and version control enabling technologies quality assurance metadata capture and preservation information and records covered by the policy
includes physical and logical structure of info held by the organization
security classification and how to implement it
IQPC February 25, 2004 24
The CGSB Standard and you Policy contains statements on, among other
things (contd) security processes and procedures including
user authentication and permission control firewall protection systems backups disaster recovery
retention and destruction policies system and procedure audits for
compliance
IQPC February 25, 2004 25
The CGSB Standard and you
The Policy manual: Keep a manual complete and current
It may refer to other standards and procedures
It authorizes the life-cycle metadata of records
It tells how data is captured and stored It controls data migration and conversion
Indexing (self-explanatory)
IQPC February 25, 2004 26
The CGSB Standard and you Authenticated data output for legal
proceedings: you display the contents of the e-records by
printouts or live display or electronic display (e.g. CD)
you have to be able to show that what you are displaying is the same as what is in the computer.
Signature of authorized person may be used have to document the reasons for any change
in format
IQPC February 25, 2004 27
The CGSB Standard and you Security and protection:
document details of all levels of access need notification of and protection against
unauthorized access to documents maintain environment according to suppliers’
recommendations and (inter)national standards encryption may improve security and integrity
need key management, certificate management take caution on self-modifying electronic records
consider use of time and date stamps document any correction of errors
control who has access to clocks
IQPC February 25, 2004 28
The CGSB Standard and you
Audit trail: A historical record of all significant events
associated with the e-record management system date of storage of information movement of info from medium to medium evidence that controls operate and are effective
Provides evidence of authenticity of records Contains system- and operator-generated logs. Standard gives lengthy list of contents.
IQPC February 25, 2004 29
Conclusions
E-records need extra care and control Partly because of lack of familiarity
Essence is integrity of information measured over the life-cycle of the record
Compliance with the Standard is a good way to take the care required
Compliance with the Standard will help in meeting common-law and statutory tests of admissibility
IQPC February 25, 2004 30
Conclusions If your electronic records can meet these tests,
then evidence law does not make you produce the paper even if the paper still exists, i.e. you don’t have to
destroy it but you can BUT there are other laws that require retention
of records, e.g. tax law, industry-specific regs SO you may have to keep the paper anyway. A sound records retention and destruction
schedule can only help.
IQPC February 25, 2004 31
SOME SOURCES Uniform Electronic Evidence Act
http://www.ulcc.ca/en/us/index.cfm?sec=1&sub=1u2
Implementation status http://www.ulcc.ca/en/cls/index.cfm?sec=4&sub=4d
Ontario Evidence Act, R.S.O. 1990 c.E.23 as amended http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/DBLaws/Statutes/English/90e23_e.htm
Canada Evidence Act R.S.C. 1985 s.C-5 as amended http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/c-5/text.html
IQPC February 25, 2004 32
Some Sources Canadian General Standard Board
http://www.pwgsc.gc.ca/cgsb/home/index-e.html Chasse “Computer-produced records in Court
Proceedings” (1994 ULCC) http://www.ulcc.ca/en/poam2/index.cfm?sec=1994&sub=1994ac
CICA on Information Security principles and audits Information Technology Control Guidelines (3d ed.) http://www.cica.ca/index.cfm/ci_id/1004/la_id/1.htm Conference in March 2004 on Auditing IT systems www.cica.ca/itaudit
IQPC February 25, 2004 33
Some Sources Industry Canada – Authentication materials
http://e-com.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet/inecic-ceac.nsf/vwGeneratedInterE/h_gv00090e.html
- Authentication principles (draft 2003) http://e-com.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet/inecic-ceac.nsf/vwapj/
authentication_principles.pdf/$FILE/authentication_principles.pdf
American Bar Association – “Record
Retention and Destruction: Current Best Practices”
http://www.abanet.org/buslaw/newsletter/0019/materials/recordretention.pdf