IQ Testing

23
Or Are you really as smart as you think you are? And how you can find out

description

IQ Testing Policy

Transcript of IQ Testing

Page 1: IQ Testing

Or

Are you really as smart as you think you are? And how you can

find out

Page 2: IQ Testing

Phrenology

Craniometry

The Dilemma:Mustard Seed or Ball Bearings

Page 3: IQ Testing

Alfred Binet

Tried to identify mentally retarded children.

Came up with the first IQ test

Page 4: IQ Testing

Mental Age Chronological Age

IQ =

A 4 year old who can answer questions that a typical 6 year old could answer would have an IQ of 150

Distinguishing Ignorance from Stupidity?

Page 5: IQ Testing

Mean = 100 Standard Deviation = 15

130+ = Gifted

145+ = Genius

70- = Moron

55- = Imbecile

25- = Idiot

Page 6: IQ Testing

Componential Intelligence – skills involving metacognition, knowledge acquisition

Experiential Intelligence – Being able to apply knowledge to novel situations

Contextual Intelligence – Common sense

Page 7: IQ Testing

The Savant Problem

Brain Damaged Cases

Gardner’s theory of Multiple Intelligences

Page 8: IQ Testing

1) Linguistic2) Mathematical 3) Spatial4) Kinesthetic5) Musical 6) Interpersonal7) Intrapersonal 8) Naturalist/Spiritual

Page 9: IQ Testing

Alan Turing and his famous test

Don’t forget Demo

Page 10: IQ Testing

What evidence would be necessary to persuade you that an animal was intelligent?

Continuum vs. Discrete Measures of Intelligence

Page 11: IQ Testing

Face Validity – The extent to which a test appears to test-takers to be validContent Validity – How well a test provides a representation of the content domainCriterion Validity – How well the test predictsConstruct Validity – Does the content domain measure what its supposed to

Page 12: IQ Testing

Multiple Choice – Easy to administer, hard to find good distracter items.

Likert Scale – Item in which you rate on a scale your level of agreement: even vs. odd

Q-sorts – checklist of adjectives: susceptible to context effects

Free response – Need a coding Scheme

Page 13: IQ Testing

Double Barreled Questions:

“I didn’t vote for Gore because I didn’t like his stance on affirmative action”

Page 14: IQ Testing

Redundant Items Lower Content Validity by Over-sampling parts of the content domain.

Mix positive and negative questions to overcome positive response bias.

Page 15: IQ Testing

Ambiguous Items lower validity:

To what extent to you agree with the following:

“An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth”

Turn the other cheek vs. I’ll hurt them twice as much as they hurt me…

Page 16: IQ Testing

Ambiguous Items lower validity:

“I’m constantly searching my room for bugs”

Page 17: IQ Testing

Demand Characteristics:Thank you for your participation in this study. You have submitted photographs of yourself, and these have been reviewed by 100 raters, at least 98 of whom have classified you as "extremely unattractive." We believe that especially unattractive people such as yourself generally have low self-esteem and feel nervous about interactions with other people. Please keep this in mind as you fill out the following survey.

Page 18: IQ Testing

Standardization

Expectation effects

Reinforcing Responses

Page 19: IQ Testing

Restricted Range Problems

Page 20: IQ Testing

Simpson’s Paradox Revisited

Page 21: IQ Testing

Feedback and the Barnum Effect

Do Demo Now

Page 22: IQ Testing

1) Intelligence is a tricky concept and is not as easily defined as one might think.

2) Testing is difficult, and many tests have problems that you need to be aware of.

Page 23: IQ Testing

Take and evaluate online tests

2-3 pages, doubles spaced, normal font and margins

You can discuss this with your classmates, but the final analysis must be your own