Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy versus ...
IPSILATERAL RADICULAR PAIN FOLLOWING DISCECTOMY K. Liaropoulos, P. Spyropoulou, P. Korovesis, Th....
-
Upload
benedict-walters -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of IPSILATERAL RADICULAR PAIN FOLLOWING DISCECTOMY K. Liaropoulos, P. Spyropoulou, P. Korovesis, Th....
IPSILATERAL RADICULAR PAIN
FOLLOWING DISCECTOMY
K. Liaropoulos, P. Spyropoulou, P. Korovesis,
Th. Maraziotis, N. Papadakis
FAILED BACK SURGERY SYNDROME(FBSS)
Refers to surgeries in the lumbarregion of the spine for varyingreasons (such as a herniated disc orspinal stenosis) and of varioussurgical techniques, without satisfactoryimprovement of symptoms.The etiology is multifactorialIts frequency reaches 10-40%
The development of a herniated disc at the same or another level of the same side and the consequent radicular syndrome, is in our opinion, a new nosological entity and the previous intervention should not be considered "failed", even if it relates indirectly, probably for reasons of biomechanical dynamics to the foregoing procedure.
The term "failed back surgery syndrome" is the
subject of this study, refers to cases of FBSS where
re-operation was necessary due to persistence (or
deterioration) or recurrence of the same radicular
syndrome with the syndrome of the preoperative
period of the first intervention which was performed
by the same technique (open hemilaminectomy
discectomy).
It is part of the general FBSS with more specific and
strict selection criteria.
OBJECTThis study aims to:
1) investigate the etiology of the persistence or
recurrence of the same radicular syndrome (the
same root in the same side) in cases where re-
operation was necessary.
2) investigate the relationship of gender, age and profession with persistence or recurrence of radicular pain.
3) investigate the correlation of time of occurrence of radicular pain
MATERIAL AND METHOD
PERIOD: February. 1995 - January 2000
MATERIAL: 64 patients showed either persistenceor recurrenceof pre-operative symptomsDuring the same period 1016 patients hadundergone surgery for a lumbar herniated disc
They were studied in terms of:medical historyobjective neurological examinationimaging methodssurgical findingspostoperative findings
LOW BACK PAIN
•Common symptom (second in frequency after headache)•5% annual rate.•Cause of activity limitation to adults under45 years of age.•Cause of loss of earnings and workers' compensationin the USA•14 billion US dollars annual cost for diagnosis andtreatment.•1% accompanied by ischialgia, whichin majority is due to a herniated intervertebral disc
ISCHIALGIA - LUMBAR HERNIATED DISC
85% of patients have a favorable result followingconservative treatment, in average 6weeks (rest, analgesics, physiotherapy)
15% of patients require surgical interventionIn 8% -25% of cases, surgical treatmentfails to relieve patients frompain or recurrence of symptoms afterdifferent than other times interval.
Table 1: Epidemiological characteristics of studiedcases
CHARACTERISTICS NUMBER OF CASES PERCENTAGE %
GENDERMenWomen
4321
6733
AGE < 20 20-50 > 50
03925
06139
PROFESSIONFarmers-WorkersOther 17
472773
TOTAL 64 100
Table 2: Age-focused analysis of cases
AGE NUMBEROF CASES
PERCENTAGE %
<20 0 0
21- 30 3 5
31- 40 14 22
41- 50 22 34
51- 60 15 23
61- 70 6 9
>70 4 6
TOTAL 64 100
Table 3: Comparison of surgical findings and CTin 32 cases
Recurrence of herniated disc 19 /14
Epidural fibrosis 3 / 8
Stenosis of lateral diverticulum +concretions
6 / 16
New projection at another level 4 / 4
Table 4: Comparison of surgical findings and MRIin 46 cases
Recurrence of herniated disc 17 /14
Epidural fibrosis 7 / 8
Stenosis of lateral diverticulum +
concretions
18 / 16
New projection at another level 4 / 4
Table 5: Postoperative monitoring andepidemiological characteristics
SUCCESSFUL UNSUCCESSFUL
NUMBER OFCASES
% NUMBER OFCASES
% TOTAL
GENDERWOMENMEN
1834
85%79%
39
15%21%
2143
AGE 20-50 >50
3220
82%80%
75
18%20%
3925
PROFESSIONFARMERS/WORKERSOTHER
1636
89%78%
210
11%22%
1846
TOTAL 52 81% 12 19% 64
Table 6: The clinical profile of 64 patients
BEFORE THE RE-OPERATION
AFTER THE RE-OPERATION
NUMBER OF CASES
% NUMBER OF CASES
%
Motor deficit No Paresis
4321
67%33%
5212
81%17%
Sensory deficit No Hypoaesthesia
460
6%94%
1153
15%83%
Reflexes decreased orabsent Normal
3826
59%41%
2935
46%64%
Table 7: Surgical findings and results
SUCCESSFUL UNSUCCESSFUL
ETIOLOGY NUMBER OFCASES
% NUMBER OFCASES
%
• Operatedincorrect level
4 6 % 0 0%
• Remaining disc 10 16% 0 0%
• Recurrence of herniated disc
14 22% 0 0%
• Stenosis of lateral diverticulum
5 8% 1/5 3%
• Concretions 6 9% 2/7 3%
• Stenosis of lateral diverticulum+concretions
9 14% 7/14 11%
• Pseudomeningomyelocele
3 5% 0 0%
• Permanent root trauma 0 0% 1/1 2%
• Epidural hematoma 1 1% 0 0%
TOTAL 52 81% 12/64 19%
Table 8: Time of recurrence of symptoms and results
TIME RESULTSSUCCESSFUL UNSUCCESSFUL TOTAL
EXCELLENT VERY MODERATE
RELATIVE FAILURE
ABSOLUTE FAILURE
1ST WEEK 13 3 3 0 1 20
2-4TH WEEK 0 9 5 1 0 15
1-6 MONTHS 0 2 7 3 5 17
6 MONTHS - 3 YEARS
0 6 4 2 0 12
TOTAL 13 20 19 6 6 64