IPCC COST ACCOUNTING · CA IPCC CA VINOD KUMAR AGARWAL Save transportation time. Can revise any...
Transcript of IPCC COST ACCOUNTING · CA IPCC CA VINOD KUMAR AGARWAL Save transportation time. Can revise any...
COST
ACCOUNTING
IPCC
REVISION BATCH NOTES
CA RAKESH V. AGRAWALLIVING DICTIONARY OF COSTING
ONE DAY
04/22/15
1
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 1
IPCC – Costing – Quick Revision• Our today’s schedule shall be as follows :• First Session : 7 to 9 AM• Break 1 : 9 to 9:15 AM• Second Session : 9:15 to 11:15 AM• Break 2 : 11:15 to 11:30 AM• Third Session : 11:30 AM to 1:30 PM• Important Note : As it is a quick revision session,
please do not waste your time in writing, but focus your attention only on revising.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 2
Three Elements of Cost
OverheadsPrime CostTotal Cost
Indirect Expenses
Direct Expenses
Expenses
Indirect LabourDirect LabourLabour Cost
Indirect MaterialDirect materialMaterial Cost
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 3
Overheads• It is further divided in to –1. Factory overheads. Also known as works
overheads, Production overheads, Manufacturing overheads etc.
2. Administration Overheads. Also known as Office overheads and
3. Selling and Distribution overheads.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 4
Simple Cost Sheet FormatParticulars Amount (Rs.)DIRECT MATERIAL ---Add : Direct Labour ---Add : Direct Expenses ---• PRIME COST ---Add : Factory / Works Overheads ---• FACTORY COST ---Add : Administrative Overheads ---• COST OF PRODUCTION ---Add : Selling & Distribution Overheads ---• COST OF SALES ---Add / Less : Profit / (Loss) ---• SALES ---
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 5
Cost Sheet with Stock AdjustmentParticulars Amount (Rs.)DIRECT MATERIAL : Op. Stock
(consumed) Add : PurchasesLess : Clo. Stock ------- ---
Add : Direct Labour ---Add : Direct Expenses ---• PRIME COST ---Add : Factory / Works Overheads ---• GROSS FACTORY / WORKS COST ---Add : Opening Work-in-Progress ---Less : Closing Work-in-Progress ---• NET FACTORY COST OF FINISHED GOODS ---Add : Administrative Overheads ---• COST OF PRODUCTION ---Add : Opening Stock of Finished Goods ---Less : Closing Stock of Finished Goods ---• COST OF GOODS SOLD ---Add : Selling & Distribution Overheads ---• COST OF SALES ---Add / Less : Profit / (Loss) ---• SALES ---
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 6
Material Cost
04/22/15
2
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 7
EOQ• EOQ is such a quantity at which the total
cost of ordering and carrying for the year is lowest and thus economical.
• EOQ can be calculated using wilson’s formula, as follows :
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 8
EOQ Formula
2 x Annual Consumption x Ordering cost per order
Carrying cost per unit p.a.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 9
Total Ordering Cost p.a.= No. of orders p.a. x ordering cost per order
= Annual consumption x ordering cost per orderOrder Size
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 10
Total Carrying Cost p.a.= Average Inventory x Carrying cost per unit p.a.
= Order Size x [ Purchase price p.u.2 x C.C. % p.a. ]
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 11
At EOQ• [ Total ordering cost p.a. + Total carrying
cost p.a. ] is minimum • i.e. Total inventory Management Cost is
minimum and• Total ordering cost p.a. = Total carrying
cost p.a.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 12
EOQ with Discount• Normally when we calculate EOQ using
Wilson’s square root formula, it is based on an assumption that the purchase price per unit of raw material is constant and that there is no discount.
• However, when the purchase price of raw material changes, the above formula does not work. We have to use another approach to calculate the answer.
04/22/15
3
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 13
EOQ with Discount• The logic of EOQ however, remains the
same i.e. minimisation of total cost.• Now we will have to calculate the total of
[purchase cost p.a. + carrying cost p.a. + ordering cost p.a.]. If this cost is minimum, then we have reached at EOQ.
• In the formula based EOQ, we tried to minimise only two costs i.e. [ carrying cost p.a. + ordering cost p.a.].
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 14
Inventory Levels• In order to manage the inventory better,
management may fix certain inventory levels. These are :
1. Reorder Level 2. Maximum Level3. Minimum Level4. Average Stock Level and5. Safety Stock Level or Danger Level
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 15
Inventory Levels• Calculation of inventory levels depend on
3 factors, which are :1. Reorder Qty.2. Reorder Period or Lead Time3. Consumption Speed or Usage Rate
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 16
Points to remember1. Reorder Qty. : It provides the answer of
how much to order ? 2. Reorder Level : It provides the answer of
when to order ?3. Reorder Period : It is the time gap
between placing an order and physical receipt of material.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 17
Reorder Qty.• It is the quantity which we order to the
supplier of material.• It is generally EOQ or any other Qty. as
given in the question.• This quantity is fixed. It means, every
time you will give an order for this much quantity only.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 18
Reorder Period or Lead Time• It is the time gap between placing an
order and actual receipt of material.• Based on past experience, it may be
further classified in to (a) Minimum lead time (b) Maximum lead time and (c) Average or Normal lead time.
04/22/15
4
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 19
Consumption Speed or Usage Rate• It is the speed of consumption of raw
material in production process.• Consumption speed depends on
production speed.• Based on past experience, we may
classify usage rate further in to 3 parts i.e. (a) Minimum usage rate (b) Maximum usage rate and (c) Average or normal usage rate.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 20
Reorder Level :-It is the level of stock at which a fresh order for purchase is given. It is calculated as :
= Maximum usage rate x Maximum lead time
Note : In case of insufficient data, one may use the following formula of Reorder level= Average usage rate x Average lead time
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 21
Minimum Level :-• It is the level below which, stock is not expected to go. If the stock goes below this level, then the purchase manager has to initiate follow up action with the supplier. It can be calculated as:
= Reorder level - [ Average usage rate x Average lead time ]
•This level will ensure that there is no understocking of goods, and production is not hampered due to shortage of material.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 22
Maximum Level :-It is the level beyond which stock is not expected to go. It is fixed to avoid overstocking.
Management will investigate the matter if stock goes beyond maximum level. It can be calculated as :
= Reorder level - (Min. usage rate x Min. lead time) + Reorder Qty. (EOQ)
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 23
Average stock Level :-This level just indicates that on an average how much stock is lying in the stores. There are 2 formulae to calculate average stock level :
A] = 1/2 (Minimum Level + Maximum Level)
OR
B] = Min Level + (1/2 of EOQ)
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 24
Safety Stock Level• It is also known as danger level.• Sometimes, management fixes reorder level
using the formula of [average lead time x average usage rate]. In such case, it is required to maintain the safety stock.
• There is no fixed formula for calculation of safety stock. Management uses it’s own discretion to decide safety stock level. However, the following formula is generally used.
• Normal usage rate x time required for urgent purchase
04/22/15
5
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 25
Safety Stock Level
• If stock goes below this level, then purchase manager will initiate an action of emergency purchase of material from alternative supplier.
• If safety stock is given in the question, then the formula for Reorder Level shall be :
• Safety stock + [Av. usage rate x Av. lead time]• However, it is important to note that, if the
formula for reorder level changes, then all the remaining answers will automatically change.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 26
ABC Analysis
• In manufacturing concerns, there are thousands of items of material. Management cannot pay equal attention to all the items in inventory. Management’s time is also costly and precious.
• In such case, all the items in inventory are divided in 3 parts, known as Category A, Category B and Category C.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 27
ABC Analysis• Category A items are those, which are very few
in numbers but they account for very high value of annual consumption.
• Category C items are those, which are very high in number but have a very low consumption value and
• The leftover items are put in Category B.• Category A items are paid highest attention,
Category B items are paid moderate attention and Category C items are paid lowest attention.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 28
Labour Cost
• It is a manpower cost.• Labour cost is divided in two parts : (1)
Direct cost and (2) Indirect cost• Direct labour cost is directly charged to
production as a part of prime cost • Indirect labour cost is charged to
respective overheads account.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 29
Labour Remuneration system
• It is the most important area of Labour Cost topic.• We will try to understand various methods of labour remuneration using some key data.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 30
Key Data Time Rate = Rs. 30 per hour Standard time allowed for one piece = 20 min.
Piece rate per unit = Rs. 30 x 20 min. 60 min
= Rs. 10 per unitActual production in a day of 8 hours -
Workers A = 30 units Workers B = 24 unitsWorkers C = 20 units
04/22/15
6
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 31
1) Time Rate system -Wages = Rate per hour x no. of hours worked A’s wages = Rs. 30 x 8 hours
Rs. 240
B’s wages = Rs. 30 x 8 hours Rs. 240
C’s wages = Rs. 30 x 8 hours Rs. 240
In this system wages are provided irrespective of efficiency and output produced by worker.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 32
2) Straight piece rate system:Wages = Rate per unit x no. of units produced
A’s wages = Rs. 10 x 30 units = Rs. 300
B’s wages = Rs. 10 x 24 units = Rs. 240
C’s wages = Rs. 10 x 20 units = Rs. 200
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 33
3) Differential piece rate:a) Taylor’s differential piece rate system –
125% of normal piece rate Equal to or more than 100%
83% of normal piece rate Less than 100%
Piece Rate Percentage of efficiency
Efficiency = Actual output x 100Standard output
Standard output expected in actual hours = 8 hours x 60 min. 20 min. / unit
= 24 units
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 34
A’s efficiency = 30 units x 100 = 125%24 units
B’s efficiency = 24 units x 100 = 100%24 units
C’s efficiency = 20 units x 100 = 83.33%24 units
Wages = No. of units produced x differential piece rate A’s wages = 30 units x (125% of Rs.10)
= 30 units x Rs.12.5 = Rs. 375B’s wages = 24 units x (125% of Rs.10)
= 24 units x Rs.12.5 = Rs. 300C’s wages = 20 units x (83% of Rs.10)
= 20 units x Rs. 8.3 = Rs. 166
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 35
b) Merrick’s Differential piece rate system –
Ordinary piece rate 110% of ordinary piece rate 130% of ordinary piece rate
Up to 83% Above 83% to 100%Over 100%
Payment of wages Efficiency
A’s wages = 30 units x (130% of Rs. 10)= 30 units x Rs.13 = Rs. 390
B’s wages = 24 units x (110% of Rs. 10)= 24 x 11 = Rs. 264
C’s wages = 20 units x (10 x 110%)= Rs. 220
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 36
4) Gantt Task Bonus Plan:
Guaranteed time wages120% of the time rate 120% of ordinary piece rate
Below standard At standard Above standard
PaymentOutput
A’s wages = No. Of units x 120% of Rs. 10(Above standard) = 30 units x Rs.12 = Rs. 360B’s wages = Time taken x 120% of Rs. 30(At standard) = 8 hrs. x Rs. 36 = Rs. 288C’s wages = 8 hrs. x Rs. 30(Below standard) = Rs. 240
04/22/15
7
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 37
5) Halsey Premium Plan Total wages = Basic wages + Incentive bonus
= (Hours worked x rate per hour) + 50% (*Time saved x Rate / hour)
Time Saved = Time allowed – Time taken Time Allowed = Standard time required for actual outputTime taken = Actual hours worked for actual output
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 38
WORKER – A :Time allowed to A – 1 unit 20 minFor actual output 30 units ?
30 units x 20 min. = 600 minutes i.e. 10 hours
Time saved by A = 10 hrs. – 8 hrs. = 2 hrs
A’s wages = (Hours worked x Rate/hr.) + 50% (time saved x Rate/hr.) = (8 hrs. x Rs. 30) + 50% (2 hrs. x Rs. 30)= Rs. 240 + Rs. 30= Rs. 270
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 39
WORKER – B :
Time allowed = 24 units x 20 min. = 480 minutes = 8 hours Time saved by B = 8 hrs. – 8 hrs. = 0
As no time is saved by worker B, no bonus is payable to him. Only the basic wages shall be given. B’s wages = 8 hrs. x Rs.30 = Rs. 240
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 40
WORKER – C:
Time allowed = 20 units x 20 min. = 400 minutes = 6.67 hoursTime Saved = 6.67 – 8 hrs. = – 1.33 hrs.
Negative time saved is treated as no time saved. Hence only basic wages are payable. C’s wages = (8 hrs. x Rs. 30) = Rs. 240
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 41
6) Rowan System:Total wages = Basic wages + Incentive bonus
Total wages = (Hours worked x Rate per hour) +Time saved x (hours worked x Rate/hr.) Time allowed
Total wages = Basic wages + Time saved x Basic wages Time allowed
A’s wages = (8 hrs. x Rs. 30) + [2/10 x (8 hrs. x Rs.30)]= Rs. 240 + Rs. 48 = Rs. 288
Worker B and worker C have saved no time, hence, only the basic wages are payable to them i.e. Rs. 240 each.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 42
7) Barth Variable sharing plan :
Wages = Rate per hour x Standard hours x Actual hours worked
A’s Wages = Rs.30 x 10 hrs x 8 hrs = Rs. 30 x 8.94 hrs.= Rs. 268.33
B’s Wages = Rs. 30 x 8 hrs x 8 hrs = Rs. 30 x 8 hours = Rs. 240
C’s Wages = Rs. 30 x 6.67 hrs x 8 hrs = Rs. 30 x 7.3 hrs = Rs. 219.14
04/22/15
8
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 43
8) Emerson Efficiency Bonus :
20% plus 1% extra for each 1% efficiency in excess of 100%.
Over 100%20% of basic wages.At 100%
Between 0% to 20% of basic wages.
Above 66 2/3%Only time wages. No bonus.Below 66 2/3%
BonusEfficiency
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 44
A’s Efficiency = 125%A’s wages = (8 hrs x Rs. 30) + 45% x (8 hrs x Rs.30)
= Rs. 240 + 108= Rs. 348
B’s Efficiency = 100%B’s wages = (8 hrs x Rs. 30) + 20% x (8 hrs x Rs.30)
= Rs. 240 + Rs. 48= Rs. 288
C’s efficiency = 83.33%C’s wages = (8 hrs x Rs.30) + *10% ( 8 hrs x Rs.30)
= Rs. 240 + Rs. 24= Rs. 264
* 10% bonus is assumed. It will be given in the question paper.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 45
9) Bedaux point premium system : -Total wages = (Hours worked x Rate / hr) +
75% (Bedaux point saved x Rate /hr.)60
Bedaux point saved = Time saved in minutesi.e. Time allowed (min) – Time taken (min)
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 46
Worker ATime saved by worker A = 2 hrs = 120 minutes Bedaux points saved = 120
A’s wages = (8 hrs. x 30) + 75% (120 min. x Rs. 30) / 60= Rs. 240 + Rs. 45= Rs. 285
Worker B and C have saved no time, hence no bonus. Only basic wages are payable, i.e. Rs. 240 each.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 47
10) Accelerating Premium Plan:
Wages = 0.8 (X)² x basic wages Where X = efficiency
= 0.8 x (Efficiency)² x (hours worked x Rate/hr.)
A’s wages = 0.8 x (1.25)² x (8 hrs x Rs. 30) = 0.8 x 1.56 x 240= Rs. 300
B’s wages = 0.8 x (1) ² x (8 hrs x Rs. 30) = 0.8 x 1 x 240= Rs. 192
C’s wages = 0.8 x (0.8333)² x (8 hrs x Rs. 30) = Rs. 133.32 (approx)
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 48
Labour Turnover• Labour turnover is the speed of change in the
composition of workforce.• Labour turnover should be lower in the
organisation. High labour turnover will cause increase in production cost.
04/22/15
9
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 49
Calculation of labour turnover ratios:
(1) Replacement method = No. of workers replaced during the year 100
Avg. no. of workers p.a.
(2) Separation Method = No. of workers separated (left) during the year 100
Avg. no. of workers p.a.
(3) Flux Method= No. of workers joined + No. of workers left 100
Avg. no. of workers p.a.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 50
OVERHEADS• The most common classification of
overheads is :1. Manufacturing Overheads2. Administration Overheads and3. Selling & Distribution Overheads
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 51
OVERHEADS• When we prepare cost sheet, we charge all the
3 overheads, to find out the total cost of a product.
• Generally, no difficulty arises for charging direct costs to the product. However, as indirect cost (i.e. overheads) bear no direct relationship with the individual product, there arises a considerable difficulty in charging overheads to individual product.
• Overheads are charged using a step by step approach to the product, to ascertain it’s cost.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 52
FACTORY OVERHEADS• There are primarily 3 methods of
charging factory overheads :1. Single Rate or Blanket Rate Method2. Departmental Rate Method and3. Activity Based Costing Method. Also
known as ABC. This method is in C.A. Final for studies.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 53
Single Rate Method• In this method, a single overhead recovery rate is
calculated for the entire factory and using this rate, factory overheads are charged to all the products.
• For example, total factory overheads for the company is say Rs. 5,00,000 and total labour hours worked is 50,000.
• Then, the factory overhead recovery rate is Rs. 10 per labour hour.
• If a product requires 15 labour hours of work, then we will charge Rs. 150 (i.e. 15 hrs. x Rs. 10 ) to that product as it’s share of factory overheads.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 54
Single Rate Method• This method is very simple to
understand and use. Hence, small organisations prefer this method of charging factory overheads.
• However, this method leads to more approximation in charging overheads.
• Pricing decision taken on the basis of this method may go wrong and hence it is not a very popular method.
04/22/15
10
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 55
Departmental Rate Method• This is one of the most popular and widely
used method of charging factory overheads.• The steps involved in this method are :1. Allocation of overheads2. Apportionment of overheads3. Re-apportionment of overheads4. Calculation of overhead recovery rates and5. Charging the overheads i.e. absorption of
overheads.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 56
Overheads Summary
Admn. OH Factory OH S & D OH
Single Rate Departmental Rate ABC[ C.A. Final ]
Allocation
Apportionment
Re-Apportionment
Recovery Rate
Absorption of OH
Charging the OH ofrespective Dept. to
the same Dept. Charging CommonOH to all the Dept.on suitable basis.Charging Service
Dept. OH to Production Dept. Calculation of OH
Rate for charging OHOH charged to the
respective Job, Batch,Process, Contract etc.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 57
Administration Overheads
• There are 3 possible treatments :1. Apportion it between Production and
Sales Department2. Charge to Costing Profit & Loss A/c3. Charge it using a separate recovery rate.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 58
Administration Overheads• The most commonly used method is to charge
admn. overheads using a separate rate of recovery.
• If a basis is given in the question itself, then use that basis, else use Works Cost (i.e. Factory Cost) as basis for charging.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 59
Selling & Distribution Overheads• If a basis is given in the question itself, then
use that basis, else use Works Cost (i.e. Factory Cost) as basis for charging.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 60
Under and over absorption of overheads
• Overhead Recovery Rate may be calculated in the following two manners :
1. Actual Basis and2. Estimated Basis (i.e. budgeted data)
04/22/15
11
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 61
Actual Basis• In this case the accountant will wait till the
close of financial year to know the actual amount of overheads incurred.
• Once the amount of actual OH is ascertained, then he calculates the overhead recovery rates for charging the overheads to cost object.
• This method involves delay in cost calculation and consequently it also delays the decision regarding fixation of sales price of the product. Hence, this method is not popular.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 62
Estimated Basis• In this case the accountant estimates (i.e.
budgets) the amount of overheads to be incurred for the year.
• On the basis of estimated OH, he calculates the overhead recovery rates for charging the overheads to cost object.
• This method is very popular because it does not cause delay in cost calculation and consequently decisions regarding fixation of sales price can be taken immediately.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 63
Estimated Basis• However, one disadvantage of this method is
that the OH absorbed on estimated basis may not tally with actual overheads incurred.
• This leads to either under absorption of OH or over absorption of overheads.
• When OH absorbed are less than OH incurred, then we call it a situation of under absorption of OH.
• When OH absorbed are more than OH incurred, then we call it a situation of over absorption of OH.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 64
Under AbsorptionOverheads A/c
To actual OH incurredSay 1,00,000
By WIP A/ci.e. OH absorbedSay 80,000
WIP A/cTo OHAbsorbed
80,000
Overheads A/cTo actual OH incurredSay 1,00,000
By WIP A/ci.e. OH absorbedSay 1,20,000
WIP A/cTo OHabsorbed
1,20,000
Over Absorption
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 65
Accounting Treatment• These under or over absorption of OH are
required to be adjusted in the books of accounts, otherwise OH account will not tally.
• There are 3 methods to deal with this situation:1. Carry forward to next year2. Transfer to Costing P & L Account and3. Use of Supplementary Rate Method
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 66
1. Carry forward of OH
• Under this method, any amount of under or over absorption of overheads is carried forward to next year with the hope that it will get adjusted with under or over absorption of overheads of the next year.
• However, this method is not recommended because it disturbs the profitability of current year as well as the profitability of next year.
• Inspite of this, small organisations prefer this method because it is very simple and does not involve any adjustment in the books.
04/22/15
12
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 67
2. Transfer to Costing P&L A/c• Under this method, any amount of under or
over absorption of overheads is transferred to Costing P & L Account.
• This method is used when the amount of under or over absorption is very small and immaterial.
• As the amount is negligible, it does not have any sizable impact on ascertainment of cost.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 68
3. Use of Supplementary Rate• This method is used when the amount of under
or over absorption is large and material.• Hence, this amount is again adjusted in the
books of accounts by charging the overheads using supplementary rate.
• However, like rectification of error, the overheads are adjusted directly in the accounts where the final effect goes.
• Hence, the adjustment is made only in Closing WIP, Closing FG and COGS.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 69
Use of Supplementary Rate
• Supplementary Rate can be calculated either on the basis of Quantity or Value of Closing WIP, Closing FG and COGS.
• You have to choose an appropriate method, depending upon the information available in the question.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 70
Job Costing, Batch Costing & Output Costing
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 71
Job Costing• It is a method of costing where goods are
produced or services are given to the customer as per his requirement. Each order of a customer is known as Job.
• Every customer’s requirement might be different from each other. Hence, we need to calculate the cost of each job separately and quote the selling price of each job separately.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 72
Batch Costing• This method of costing is used in an industry
where the goods are produced in lots or batches.
• In this case, we need to maintain the accounting record batch wise, so that we can ascertain the cost of each batch separately.
• Once we calculate the cost of a batch, then we can easily calculate cost per unit also.
04/22/15
13
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 73
Batch Costing• We have to charge the prime cost and
overheads to each batch, to ascertain the cost of a batch.
• Thus, it is similar to job costing only.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 74
Economic Batch Quantity (EBQ)• It is the most economical quantity
which we should produce in one batch. Simply speaking, it is the economic batch size.
• The optimum batch size can be calculated using a formula, which is similar to the formula of EOQ.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 75
Economic Batch Quantity (EBQ)2 x Annual Demand x Set up cost per batch
Carrying cost per unit per annum
• Please note the following changes in EOQ :1. EOQ was for raw material, EBQ is for finished
goods.2. Annual consumption is replaced by annual
sales demand and3. Ordering cost is replaced by set up cost.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 76
Economic Batch Quantity (EBQ)
2 x Annual Demand x Set up cost per batchCarrying cost per unit per annum
• The objective here is to minimise the total of [annual set up cost + annual carrying cost]
• Carrying cost per unit p.a. can be calculated as [production cost per unit x c.c. % p.a.]
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 77
Total Set up Cost p.a.= No. of batches x set up cost per batch
= Annual Demand x set up cost per batchBatch Size
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 78
Total Carrying Cost p.a.= Average Inventory x Carrying cost per unit p.a.
= Batch Size x c.c. p.u. p.a.2
04/22/15
14
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 79
Single Unit or Output Costing• This method of costing is used in an
industry, where only one type of product is manufactured. Hence, calculation of cost is very simple.
• Cost per unit = Total CostNo. of units produced
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 80
Contract Costing• Difference between job costing and
contract costing• Contractor and Contractee• Cost plus contract and Fixed price contract• Completed contract method and
Proportionate completion method• Note : from exam point of view, the stress
is on fixed price contract and proportionate completion method.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 81
Important terms• Contract price• Work certified• Progress payment• Retention money• Cost of work certified • Cost of work uncertified• Notional profit = [ work certified – cost of
work certified ]
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 82
Contract Account for 31.03.15 ending
7,00,000Total7,00,000Total
6,00,000
1,00,000
By work certified[ up to 31.01.15 ]By cost of workUncertified[ Feb + Mar ]
3,00,0001,50,000
50,000
2,00,000
To Material CostTo Labour costTo Overheads[ upto 31.03.15 ]To Notional Profit
Rs.ParticularsRs.Particulars
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 83
Formulae for Transfer to P&L A/c• This is the main area of discussion in contract
costing.• The basic principle used is the ‘Concept of
Prudence’.• Prudence simply means, one may account for
anticipated losses but not the anticipated gain.• When contract is incomplete, there is an
uncertainty about its future. Hence, we need to make a provision for future contingency, out of the notional profit earned.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 84
Formulae for Transfer to P&L A/c
• If there is a notional loss on the contract :• Transfer entire loss to profit and loss
account.• If future further loss is anticipated and can
be measured, then one should also make a provision for such future losses also.
04/22/15
15
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 85
Formulae for Transfer to P&L A/c• If there is a notional profit on the contract,
then the amount of profit to be transferred to P&L depends upon the % completion of contract as follows :
• If the contract work has progressed below 25%, then nothing is transferred to P&L. Because it is considered too early to account for the profit. It also means, entire notional profit will remain as provision for future contingency.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 86
Formulae for Transfer to P&L A/c
• If the contract work has progressed 25% and above, then some profit is transferred to P&L as per the following formula :
1 x Notional Profit x Cash Received3 Work Certified
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 87
Formulae for Transfer to P&L A/c
• If the contract work has progressed 50% and above, then the formula shall be :
2 x Notional Profit x Cash Received3 Work Certified
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 88
Formulae for Transfer to P&L A/c• If the contract is nearing completion, i.e. the
work has progressed 90% and above, then the formulae are based on total estimated profit. Total estimated profit can be calculated as :(a) Total contract price xxx(b) Total estimated cost :
cost incurred till date xxxfurther cost of completion xxx xxx
(c) Total estimated profit [ a – b ] xxx
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 89
Nearing Completion Contract• There are four formulae :(a) Total Estimated x Work Certified
Profit (TEP) Total contract price
(b) TEP x work certified x cash receivedtotal contract price work certified
(c) TEP x cost incurred till datetotal estimated cost
(d) TEP x cost till date x cash receivedtotal estimated cost work certified
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 90
Escalation Clause• It is one of the clauses in the agreement
between Contractor and Contractee.• In fixed price contract, contractor carries a risk of
increase in prices of raw material, labour cost etc. To safeguard himself against the rise in prices in future, he may request the contractee for inclusion of this clause in the agreement.
• By this clause, some of the burden of increase in price is transferred to contractee. It means, contractee will pay extra amount over and above the fixed contract price to cover such increase in cost.
04/22/15
16
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 91
Escalation Clause• For example – It is agreed between contractor
and contractee that, in the event of increase in cement price beyond Rs. 200 per bag, the contractee will bear 40% burden of such increase in price.
• Let’s further assume that 1,000 bags of cement is consumed @ Rs. 250 per bag. In such case, the increase in cost is [ 1,000 bags x Rs. 50 ] = Rs. 50,000.
• The contractee will pay an extra Rs. 20,000 [i.e. 40% of 50,000] to the contractor, as per escalation clause.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 92
Costing in Service Sector(Operating Costing)
This method of costing is used forcalculating cost and profitability inthe Service industry. E.g. Goodstransport, Passenger transport,Hotels, Hospitals, EducationalInstitutes etc.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 93
Important points to note :1. Identification of Unit of Service
2. Quantification of effective services rendered
3. Uniformity of data
4. Cost Sheet format
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 94
Cost Sheet FormatParticulars Per Unit TotalA. Variable Cost :B. Semi Variable Cost :C. Fixed CostD. Total Cost (A+B+C)E. RevenueF. Profit
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 95
Process Costing & Operation Costing• This method of costing is used in an industry,
where the goods are produced continuously in various stages.
• These stages of production are known as Processes or Operations.
• Output of previous process becomes the input of next process.
• Cost records are maintained process wise. It means, cost of production is calculated at each stage of production.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 96
Bird’s Eye View
Simple QuestionsInvolving
adjustment ofNormal Loss
Abnormal LossAbnormal Gain
Questions ofEquivalentProductionInvolving
Valuation byFIFO
LIFO andAverage method
Questions ofInter processtransfers at
profitInvolving
Adjustment ofunrealised profit
on stock i.e.Stock Reserve
MiscellaneousQuestions
04/22/15
17
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 97
Important Formula• Normal Cost Per Unit of Output =
Total Process Cost – Realisable value of normal scrapInput Quantity – Normal Loss Qty.
• The cost per unit so obtained is used for valuation of :• Output transferred to next process• Abnormal loss and• Abnormal gain.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 98
Let’s see how it is presented
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 99
Process – I A/cParticulars Qty . Rate Amt. Particulars Qty. Rate Amt.
To Input RM To Other material To direct wages To Prod OH (100% of wages)
Total
1,000
1,000
6 6,000
5,200
4,000
4,000
19,200
By Normal loss(1000 5%)By output trans. to process II a/c
Total
50
950
1000
4 200
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 100
Working Notes :1) Calculation of cost per unit of output :
Total process cost - Realizable value of (RM + labour +OH) normal loss
= Input (Qty) – normal loss (Qty)
Process I = 19,200 – 2001000 – 50
= Rs. 20 per unit
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 101
Process – I A/cParticulars Qty Rate Amt. Particulars Qty Rate Amt.
To Input RM To Other material To direct wages To Prod OH (100%)
Total
1,000
1,000
6 6,000
5,200
4,000
4,000
19,200
By Normal loss(1000 5%)By output trans. to process II a/c
Total
50
950
1000
4
20
200
19,000
19,200
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 102
Process II A/cParticulars Qty Rate Amt. Particulars Qty Rate Amt.
To Input recd. from process I
To Material To Wages To Prodn.
OH
Total
950
950
20 19,000
3,9606,000
6,000
34,960
By Normal loss (950 10%)
By Output trans. to process III
By Abnormal loss a/c
Total
95
840
15
950
8
40
40
760
33,600
600
34,960
Process Il = 34,960 – 760950 – 95
= Rs. 40 per unit
04/22/15
18
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 103
Process III A/cParticulars Qty Rate Amt. Particulars Qty. Rate Amt. To Input recd. from process II To Direct
material To Direct wages To Prodn OH To Abnormal
gain a/c
Total
840
36
876
40
76
33,600
5,9248,0008,000
2,736
58,260
By normal loss (840 15%)By Out put trans. to finished goods
Total
126
750
876
10
76
1,260
57,000
58,260
Process Ill = 55,524 – 1,260840 – 126
= Rs. 76 per unit
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 104
Let’s see an example of equivalent units( just try to remember these figures )
• Opening WIP = 2,000 unitsMaterial cost (100%) = Rs. 7,500Labour cost (60%) = Rs. 3,000Overheads (60%) = Rs. 1,500
• Units introduced into the process = 8,000• Cost incurred during the period :
Material cost = Rs. 1,00,000Labour cost = Rs. 78,000Overheads = Rs. 39,000
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 105
• Units completed and transferred to next process is = 8,000 units
• Closing WIP = 2,000 unitsMaterial cost = 100% completeLabour cost = 50% completeOverheads = 50% complete
• We will solve it by all the 3 methods –
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 106
Particulars ( FIFO Basis )
Total units
Equivalent units Material Labour & OH
% Units % Units Input :Opening WIP Units introduced Total input Output :a) Units completed & trans. Out of opening WIP Out of fresh input
Sub-total (a)b) Closing WIP (out of fresh)
Total
2,0008,000
10,000
2,0006,0008,0002,000
10,000
-100%
100%
-6,000
2,000
8,000
40%100%
50%
8006,000
1,000
7,800
1) Statement of equivalent production :
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 107
Particulars Material Labour Overhead Total Cost incurred during
the period () Equivalent units
Cost per Eq. unit
1,00,0008,000
12.50
78,0007,800
10.00
39,0007,800
5.00
217,000-
27.50
2) Statement of cost :
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 108
Particulars Rs. Rs. A) Units completed & transferred
(i) Out of opening WIP - Cost already incurred Cost incurred now
Labour & OH (800 15)(ii) Out of introduced
(6,000 units Rs. 27.50) Subtotal (A) B) Closing WIP :
Material (2,000 units Rs. 12.50)Labour (1000 units Rs. 10)Overheads (1000 units x Rs. 5)
Total (A + B)
12,000
12,000
25,00010,0005,000
24,000
1,65,0001,89,000
40,0002,29,000
3) Allocation of cost :
04/22/15
19
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 109
Particulars Qty Rate Amt Particulars Qty Rate Amt To Opening WIPTo Units introducedTo Labour To Overhead
Total
2,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
100,000
78,00039,000
229,000
By Units completed & transferred
By Closing WIP
Total
8,000
2,000
10,000
WN 3(A)
WN 3(B)
189,000
40,000
229,000
4) Process A/c (FIFO Method)
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 110
Particulars Total units
Equivalent units Materials Lab. & OH% Units % Units
Input:Opening WIP Units brought into process Total input Output :a) Units completed & trans.
Out of fresh input
b) Closing WIP :Out of opening WIP
Total
2,0008,000
10,000
8,000
2,000
10,000
100%
-
8,000
-
8,000
100%
(10%)
8,000
(200)
7,800
1) Statement of equivalent production : [ LIFO Method ]
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 111
Particulars Material Labour Overhead Total Cost incurred during
the period () Equivalent units
Cost per Eq. unit
1,00,0008,000
12.50
78,0007,800
10.00
39,0007,800
5.00
217,000-
27.50
2) Statement of cost :
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 112
Particulars Rs Rs A) Units completed & transferred
(8,000 units Rs. 27.50)
B) Closing WIP : [ Out of OP. WIP ] Cost already incurred
( 7,500 + 3,000 + 1,500) Cost incurred now
Labour ( 200 x 10)Overhead ( 200 x 5 )
Total
12,000
(2,000)(1,000)
2,20,000
9,000
2,29,000
3) Allocation of cost :
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 113
Particulars Qty Rate Amt Particulars Qty Rate Amt To Opening WIPTo Units introducedTo Labour To Overhead
Total
2,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
100,000
78,00039,000
229,000
By Units completed & transferred
By Closing WIP
Total
8,000
2,000
10,000
WN 3(A)
WN 3(B)
220,000
9,000
229,000
4) Process A/c (LIFO Method)
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 114
Particulars( Average cost method)
Total units
Equivalent units Materials Lab./OH
% Units % Units Input:Opening WIP Fresh Input
Total input
Outputa) Units completed & trans.
b) Closing WIP
Total
2,0008,000
10,000
8,000
2,000
10,000
100%
100%
8,000
2,000
10,000
100%
50%
8,000
1,000
9,000
1) Statement of equivalent production : [Average Method]
04/22/15
20
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 115
Particulars Material Labour Overheads Total Cost of Opening WIPCost incurred during the year
Total Cost() Equivalent units
Cost per equivalent unit
7,500100,000
107,50010,000
10.75
3,00078,000
81,0009,000
9.00
1,50039,000
40,5009,000
4.50
12,0002,17,000
2,29,000-
24.25
2) Statement of cost :
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 116
Particulars Rs. Rs. A) Units completed & transferred
(8,000 units Rs. 24.25)B) Closing WIP :
Material (2,000 units Rs. 10.75)Labour (1,000 units x Rs. 9)Overheads (1,000 units Rs. 4.50)
Total cost
21,5009,0004,500
1,94,000
35,000
2,29,000
3) Allocation of cost :
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 117
Particulars Qty Rate Amt Particulars Qty Rate Amt To Opening WIPTo Units introducedTo Labour To Overhead
Total
2,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
100,000
78,00039,000
229,000
By Units completed & transferred
By Closing WIP
Total
8,000
2,000
10,000
WN 3(A)
WN 3(B)
194,000
35,000
229,000
4) Process A/c (Average Method)
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 118
Difference between FIFO/LIFO/Average
(a) Cost of opening WIP is kept separate & taken to the statement of allocation of cost.
(b) Equivalent units of FIFO & LIFO are always equal.
(c) We need the % completion break up of Op. WIP.
(d) We do not need the cost break up of opening WIP.
FIFO & LIFO Method(a) Cost of opening WIP is
added to current cost in the statement of cost.
(b) Equivalent units of Average method are always higher.
(c) We do not need the % completion of Op. WIP.
(d) We need the cost break up of opening WIP.
Average Method
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 119
Let’s see the presentation of Inter process profit questions
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 120
Process I A/c
10,00020,00015,00045,000(5,000)40,00014,00054,00018,000
72,000
--------
*18,000
18,000
10,00020,00015,00045,000(5,000)40,00014,00054,000
-
54,000
To Opening stockTo Direct MaterialsTo Direct WagesPrime cost of productionLess : Closing StockPrime cost of transferTo Production overheadsTotal cost of transferTo Costing P & L A/c*( 25 / 75 x 54,000 )By Transfer to Process II A/c
TotalProfitCostParticulars
04/22/15
21
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 121
Process II A/c
12,00072,00021,00015,000
1,20,000(6,000)
1,14,0006,000
1,20,00030,000
1,50,000
2,00018,000
--
20,000*(1,000)
19,000-
19,00030,000
49,000
10,00054,00021,00015,000
1,00,000(5,000)
95,0006,000
1,01,000-
1,01,000
To Opening StockTo Input recd. from process ITo Direct MaterialsTo Direct WagesPrime cost of productionLess : Closing Stock*[ 20,000 / 1,20,000 x 6,000 ]Prime cost of transferTo Production OverheadsTotal cost of transferTo Costing P & L A/c*( 20 / 80 x 1,20,000 )By Transfer to Process III A/c
TotalProfitCostParticulars
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 122
Process III A/c
8,0001,50,000
30,00016,000
2,04,000(4,000)
2,00,00040,000
2,40,00060,000
3,00,000
2,00049,000
--
51,000*(1,000)
50,000-
50,00060,000
1,10,000
6,0001,01,000
30,00016,000
1,53,000(3,000)
1,50,00040,000
1,90,000-
1,90,000
To Opening StockTo Input recd. From process IITo Direct MaterialsTo Direct WagesPrime cost of productionLess : Closing Stock*[ 51,000/ 2,04,000 x 4,000]Prime cost of transferTo Production OverheadTotal cost of transferTo Costing P & L A/c( 20/80 x 2,40,000 )By transfer to Fin. goods A/c
TotalProfitCostParticulars
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 123
Finished goods A/c
30,0003,00,000
3,30,000(15,000)
3,15,0003,500
3,18,50031,500
3,50,000
11,0001,10,000
1,21,000*(5,500)
1,15,500-
1,15,50031,500
1,47,000
19,0001,90,000
2,09,000(9,500)
1,99,5003,500
2,03,000-
2,03,000
To Opening StockTo Finished goods recd. from process III A/cTotal goods available for saleLess : Closing Stock*[1,21,000 / 3,30,000 x 15,000]Cost of goods soldTo Selling overheadsCost of SalesTo Costing P & L A/c (Bal. fig.)By Sales A/c
TotalProfitCostParticulars
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 124
Costing Profit & Loss A/c
2,0002,000
11,000
18,00030,00060,00031,500
1,54,500
By Op. St. reserve b/dProcess 2 A/cProcess 3 A/cFinished goods A/c
By Profit earned :Process 1 A/cProcess 2 A/cProcess 3 A/cFinished Goods A/c
Total
1,47,000
1,0001,0005,500
1,54,500
To Actual realised profit ( Bal. fig.)
To Closing Stock reserve c/d :
Process 2 A/cProcess 3 A/cFinished Goods A/c
Total
AmountParticularsAmountParticulars
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 125
Stock Valuation for Balance Sheet purposes :
5,000
5,000
3,000
9,500
22,500
5,000Nil
6,000(1,000)
4,000(1,000)15,000(5,500)
Stock of process 1Less : Stock ReserveStock of process 2Less : Stock ReserveStock of process 3Less : Stock ReserveStock of Finished goodsLess : Stock Reserve
Total Stock
Rs.Rs.Particulars
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 126
Joint Product, By-Product Costing
• This method of costing is used in an industry, where multiple products emerge out of a common process.
• These multiple products are either known as Joint Products or By Products.
04/22/15
22
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 127
Joint Product, By-Product Costing• The products whose economic value is higher
are known as joint products and those products whose economic value is lower are known as by products.
• Joint Products can also be called as Major Products or Main Products and
• By Products are called as Minor Products or Subsidiary Products.
• It is judgement of management to treat some of the products as joint products and some of them as by products.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 128
Some Important Concepts
• Joint cost = cost up to split off point = cost up to separation point = common cost
• Further processing cost = cost incurred after split off point = cost incurred after separation point = separate cost
• Net realisable value (NRV) = Final sale value – further processing cost.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 129
Accounting of By-Products
Joint Cost :Material 50,000Labour 30,000Overheads 20,000Total 1,00,000
Product ‘A’ – Joint Product
Product ‘B’ – Joint Product
Product ‘C’ – By Product
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 130
Accounting of By-Products
Joint Cost :Material 50,000Labour 30,000Overheads 20,000Total 1,00,000
Product ‘A’ – Joint Product
Product ‘B’ – Joint Product
Product ‘C’ – By Product
Other Income Method – i.e. cr. to P&L account
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 131
Accounting of By-Products
Joint Cost :Material 50,000Labour 30,000Overheads 20,000Total 1,00,000
Product ‘A’ – Joint Product
Product ‘B’ – Joint Product
Product ‘C’ – By Product
Credit of sale value to joint cost
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 132
Accounting of By-Products
Joint Cost :Material 50,000Labour 30,000Overheads 20,000Total 1,00,000
Product ‘A’ – Joint Product
Product ‘B’ – Joint Product
Product ‘C’ – By Product
Credit of net sale value to joint cost i.e. NRV
04/22/15
23
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 133
Accounting of By-Products
Joint Cost :Material 50,000Labour 30,000Overheads 20,000Total 1,00,000
Product ‘A’ – Joint Product
Product ‘B’ – Joint Product
Product ‘C’ – By Product
Reverse Cost Method i.e. Gross sale value – estimated profit –further processing cost = estimated cost at split off point
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 134
Accounting of By-Products
Joint Cost :Material 50,000Labour 30,000Overheads 20,000Total 1,00,000
Product ‘A’ – Joint Product
Product ‘B’ – Joint Product
Product ‘C’ – By Product
Opportunity cost method
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 135
Accounting of By-Products
Joint Cost :Material 50,000Labour 30,000Overheads 20,000Total 1,00,000
Product ‘A’ – Joint Product
Product ‘B’ – Joint Product
Product ‘C’ – By Product
Standard cost method i.e. pre determined cost
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 136
Accounting of By-Products
Joint Cost :Material 50,000Labour 30,000Overheads 20,000Total 1,00,000
Product ‘A’ – Joint Product
Product ‘B’ – Joint Product
Product ‘C’ – By Product
Any other suitable method.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 137
Accounting of Joint Products• Physical Output i.e. Quantity Method : Let’s
assume that there are only 2 joint products A & B, and we have to distribute joint cost Rs. 98,000.
• If output of A & B is 2,000 units and 3,000 units respectively, then the joint cost shall be distributed in the ratio of 2 : 3.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 138
Accounting of Joint Products• Relative Sale Value Method : It is the most
popular and logical method of apportionment of joint cost.
• Sale value is calculated as [selling price x output quantity].
• Let’s see the logic, why sale value method is the most preferred method.
04/22/15
24
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 139
An Example
30,0001,00,000Sale value1050Sales price per unit
3,0002,000Output QuantityProduct ‘B’Product ‘A’Particulars
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 140
Accounting of Joint Products• Relative Sale Value Method :• It has 4 different variations -1. Final sale value method2. Net realisable value method (NRV)3. Actual sale value at separation point4. Reverse cost method
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 141
Accounting of Joint Products
• Technical Evaluation or Survey Method
• Marginal cost and contribution method
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 142
Cost Ledger Accounting• This topic can be divided in to 3 parts :1. Pure Cost Ledger Accounting i.e. Non-
Integrated Accounts. Only Nominal Accounts are maintained i.e. Revenue and Cost accounts are kept.
2. Integrated Accounting System. Personal, Real and Nominal, all accounts are maintained.
3. Reconciliation of Profit as per Cost Records and Financial Records.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 143
Cost Ledger Accounts
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 144
Stores Ledger Control Account
TotalTotal
By closing stock c/d
To GLA –Purchase Exp.
By Factory OH –indirect material
To GLA -Purchases
By WIP – direct material
To opening stock b/d
Rs.Particulars Rs.Particulars
04/22/15
25
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 145
Wages Control Account
TotalTotal
By Factory OH –indirect wages
By WIP – direct wages
To GLA – wages incurred
Rs.Particulars Rs.Particulars
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 146
Factory Overheads Control Account
TotalTotal
To GLA – indirect expenses
To Wages A/c –indirect wages
By WIP – Factory OH absorbed
To Stores Ledger - indirect material
Rs.Particulars Rs.Particulars
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 147
Work in Progress Control Account
By Closing WIPFOHTo Factory OHDETo GLA
TotalTotal
(Factory cost of FG)DLTo Wages A/c
By Finished Goods A/c
DMTo Stores ledger To Opening WIP
Rs.Particulars Rs.Particulars
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 148
Administration OH Control Account
TotalTotal
By Finished Goods A/c – Ad. OH absorbed
To GLA – Admn. overheads incurred
Rs.Particulars Rs.Particulars
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 149
Finished Goods Control Account
TotalTotalBy closing stockTo Admn. OH
By Cost of Sales A/c – COGS
To WIP A/c –factory cost of FG
To opening stockRs.Particulars Rs.Particulars
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 150
Selling & Dist. OH Control Account
TotalTotal
By Cost of Sales A/c – S&D OH absorbed
To GLA – S & D overheads incurred
Rs.Particulars Rs.Particulars
04/22/15
26
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 151
Cost of Sales Account
To S & D OH A/cTotalTotal
By Costing P&L A/c – transfer of cost of sales
To Finished Goods A/c –COGS
Rs.Particulars Rs.Particulars
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 152
Sales Account
TotalTotal
By GLA A/c –actual sales
To Costing P&L A/c – transfer
Rs.Particulars Rs.Particulars
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 153
Costing Profit & Loss Account
TotalTotal
To GLA A/c –transfer of profit
By Sales A/cTo Cost of Sales A/c
Rs.Particulars Rs.Particulars
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 154
General Ledger Adj. A/c (GLA)
Particulars Rs. Particulars Rs.
To Sales By bal. b/dBy Stores Ledger
By Wages A/c
By Factory OHBy Admn. OHBy S & D OH
To balance c/d By Costing P<otal Total
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 155
Integrated Ledger Accounts• Under Integrated accounting system, we
merge the cost accounts with financial accounts.
• We maintain all the types of accounts i.e. Personal, Real and Nominal accounts.
• GLA A/c is replaced by respective accounts like Cash, Bank, Debtors, Creditors, Fixed Assets etc.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 156
Standard Costing & Variance Analysis• It is a technique, which is popularly used
for cost control.
04/22/15
27
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 157
Types of VariancesVariances are
of 3 types
Sales Variances Cost Variances Profit Variances[ C.A. Final ]
Labour Cost Variable OH Fixed OHMaterial Cost
Note : Profit Variances are in C.A. Final Syllabus.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 158
Summary of Material Cost Variances
Total Cost Variance= (SQ x SP) – (AQ x AP)
Price Variance= AQ x (SP – AP)
Usage Variance= SP x (SQ – AQ)
Mix Variance= SP x (SM – AM)
Sub-Usage= SP x (SQ – SM)
AM = Actual Qty. Consumed and
SM = Actual Total Qty. consumed revised in standard proportion.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 159
Circular Tally™
SQ x SP AQ x AP
AQ x SP
Cost Variance
Price VarianceUsage Variance
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 160
Circular Tally©
SQ AQ i.e. AM
AQ revised i.e. SM
Usage Variance
Mix VarianceSub-usage Variance
SP
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 161
Key Points1. In case of Mix Variance, if actual mix (i.e. actual
quantity consumed) is more than standard mix, then the variance is adverse else it is favourable.
2. In case of Sub-usage variance, if standard mix (calculated from actual quantity) is more than standard quantity, then it is adverse else it is favourable.
3. In case of mix variance, total quantity consumed is same, but difference is due to mixing proportion.
4. In case of sub-usage variance, mixing proportion is same, but the difference is only due to quantity.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 162
Labour Cost Variances
04/22/15
28
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 163
Summary of Labour Cost VariancesTotal Cost Variance
= (SH x SR) – (AH x AR)
Rate Variance= AH x (SR – AR)
Efficiency Variance= SR x (SH – AH)
Mix Variance= SR x (SM – AM)
Sub-Efficiency= SR x (SH – SM)
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 164
Circular Tally™
SH x SR AH x AR
AH x SR
Cost Variance
Rate VarianceEfficiency Variance
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 165
Circular Tally©
SH AH i.e. AM
AH revised i.e. SM
Efficiency Variance
Mix VarianceSub-efficiency Variance
SR
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 166
Variable OH Cost Variances
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 167
Calculation of Standard Recovery Rates :
• SRR/Unit = Budgeted OverheadsBudgeted Output
• SRR/Hour = Budgeted OverheadsBudgeted Hours
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 168
Analysis of V. OH Cost Variance
Cost Variance(SRR/unit x actual output) – Actual OH
Expenditure Variance= (SRR/hr. x actual hrs.) – Actual OH
Efficiency Variance= SRR/hr. (Std. hrs. – Actual hrs.)
04/22/15
29
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 169
Fixed OH Cost Variances
OH Cost Variance
OH Expenditure VarianceOH Volume Variance
( Output based )
OH Capacity Variance( Hours based )
OH Efficiency Variance
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 170
Trick to remember formulae
• First and last variance is same as Variable OH variance i.e. Cost variance and Efficiency variance.
• Rest all the variances are Budget minus Actual.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 171
Fixed OH Cost Variances
OH Cost Variance= (SRR/unit x Actual Output) – Actual Overheads
OH Expenditure Variance= Budgeted OH – Actual OH
OH Volume (output) Variance =SRR/unit x (Budgeted Output –
Actual Output)
OH Capacity (hours) Variance =SRR/hour x ( Budgeted Hours –
Actual Hours )
OH Efficiency Variance =SRR/hour x ( Standard Hours –
Actual Hours )
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 172
Sales Variances
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 173
Summary
Sales Value Variance(Bud. Qty. x SSP) – (Actual Qty. x ASP)
Sales Price VarianceActual Qty. x (SSP – ASP)
Sales Volume Variance SSP x (Bud. Qty. – Actual Qty.)
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 174
Circular Tally™
BQ x SSP AQ x ASP
AQ x SSP
Sales Value Variance
Sales Price Variance
Sales Volume Variance
04/22/15
30
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 175
Marginal Costing• It is a technique used for managerial
decision making.• This technique recognises only two types
of costs i.e. (1) Variable cost and (2) Fixed cost.
• If there is a semi-variable cost, then it needs to be sub-divided into variable and fixed cost separately.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 176
Division of CostTotal Cost
Prime Cost Overheads
Variable OH Fixed OHVariable cost
Fixed cost
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 177
Behaviour of Cost
TotalPer unitTotalPer unit
constantincreasesdecreasesconstantDecrease
constantdecreasesincreasesconstantIncrease
Fixed CostVariable CostProduction
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 178
Golden FormulaSales – Variable Cost = ContributionContribution – Fixed Cost = Profit/Loss
We can say that excess contribution over fixed cost is profit and excess of fixed cost over contribution is loss.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 179
One, Two ka Four• Sales – Variable Cost = Contribution
• Sales – Contribution = Variable Cost
• Sales = Variable cost + Contribution
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 180
One, Two ka Four• Contribution – Fixed Cost = Profit/(Loss)Assuming there is a profit :• Contribution = Fixed Cost + Profit• Contribution – Profit = Fixed CostAssuming there is a loss :• Contribution = Fixed Cost - Loss• Contribution + Loss = Fixed Cost
04/22/15
31
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 181
Profit Volume Ratio
• P/V Ratio = Contribution
SalesX 100
Sales
Variable Cost Contribution
Variable Cost Ratio P/V Ratio
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 182
Profit Volume RatioThe P/V Ratio formula can be reshuffled to get 2 more
important formulae as follows :
Contribution
P / V RatioSales =
Sales x P/V Ratio = Contribution
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 183
Break Even Point (BEP)• It is the point at which there is no profit or no
loss.• It means, at BEP, Total Contribution = Total
Fixed Cost• Management is interested in knowing BEP,
because the first objective of management is to cross BEP.
• A firm starts earning profit only after crossing BEP.
• BEP can be expressed in 3 ways – (a) No. of units, (b) Sale Value Or (c) % capacity.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 184
BEP in No. of Units
Total Fixed Cost=
Contribution per unit
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 185
BEP in Sales Value
Total Fixed Cost=
Profit Volume Ratio
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 186
BEP in % Capacity
Total Fixed Cost=
Contribution at 1% capacity
04/22/15
32
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 187
BEP – All in one formula
Total Fixed Cost=
Cont. p.u./PV ratio/cont. at 1% cap.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 188
Volume of Sales required to earn desired profit
Desired profit + total fixed cost=
cont. p.u./PV ratio/cont. at 1% cap.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 189
Profitability at desired level of output
= Total Contribution – Total Fixed Cost= (no. of units x contribution per unit) - Total
Fixed Cost OR= (Sales x P/V Ratio) – Fixed Cost OR= (% capacity x cont. at 1% capacity) – fixed
cost
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 190
Margin of Safety (MOS)• It is the sales in excess of BEP sales.• MOS = Total Actual Sales – BEP Sales
• MOS Ratio = MOS Sales x 100Total Actual Sales
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 191
Margin of Safety Ratio
Actual Sales
MOS Sales
BEP Sales BEP Ratio
MOS Ratio
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 192
Net Profit = MOS Sales x P/V Ratio
Total Sales X P/V ratio
MOS SalesX P/V Ratio
BEP SalesX P/V Ratio
Contribution= Fixed Cost
Contribution= Net Profit
04/22/15
33
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 193
SalesQty.
Sales @ Rs. 10
Variable Cost @ Rs. 6
Contribution @ Rs. 4
Fixed Cost
Profit TotalCost
10,000 1,00,000 60,000 40,000 25,000 15,000 85,000
15,000 1,50,000 90,000 60,000 25,000 35,000 1,15,000
Diff.5,000
50,000 30,000 20,000 NIL 20,000 30,000
Variable Cost p.u. = Change in Total CostChange in Output
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 194
SalesQty.
Sales @ Rs. 10
Variable Cost @ Rs. 6
Contribution @ Rs. 4
Fixed Cost
Profit TotalCost
10,000 1,00,000 60,000 40,000 25,000 15,000 85,000
15,000 1,50,000 90,000 60,000 25,000 35,000 1,15,000
Diff.5,000
50,000 30,000 20,000 NIL 20,000 30,000
Contribution p.u. = Change in ProfitChange in Output
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 195
SalesQty.
Sales @ Rs. 10
Variable Cost @ Rs. 6
Contribution @ Rs. 4
Fixed Cost
Profit TotalCost
10,000 1,00,000 60,000 40,000 25,000 15,000 85,000
15,000 1,50,000 90,000 60,000 25,000 35,000 1,15,000
Diff.5,000
50,000 30,000 20,000 NIL 20,000 30,000
P / V Ratio = Change in Profit x 100Change in Sales
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 196
SalesQty.
Sales @ Rs. 10
Variable Cost @ Rs. 6
Contribution @ Rs. 4
Fixed Cost
Profit TotalCost
10,000 1,00,000 60,000 40,000 25,000 15,000 85,000
15,000 1,50,000 90,000 60,000 25,000 35,000 1,15,000
Diff.5,000
50,000 30,000 20,000 NIL 20,000 30,000
Variable Cost Ratio. = Change in Cost x 100Change in Sales
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 197
Budgets and Budgetary Control• Budget is a quantitative plan of action for
future period.• Budgetary control is a technique of
exercising overall managerial control with the help of budgets.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 198
Types of Budgets• From examination point of view, you are
generally asked to prepare :1. Functional Budgets : i.e. Sales budget,
Production budget, Purchase budget, Manpower budget, Cash budget etc. and
2. Flexible Cost Budgets : i.e. Calculation of cost at various levels of activities. These are based on marginal costing principles.
04/22/15
34
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 199
Functional Budgets• These are very popular questions.• To solve these questions, first you have to
identify the key factor or budget factor. In majority cases, it is sales.
• Then you have form a linkage between key factor and other dependent budgets like production, material consumption, material purchase, manpower etc.
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 200
Important Formulae1. For Finished Goods :
Op. stock + Production – Sales = Clo. Stock Production = Sales + Clo. stock – Op. stock2. For Raw Material :
Op. stock + Purchase – Consumption = Clo. Stock Purchase = Consumption + Clo. Stock – Op. stock
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 201
Common Link used in Budget
Sales Budget
Production Budget
Consumption Budget Purchase Budget
Manpower Budget
Master Budget
CA. Rakesh Agrawal 202
THANK YOU AND
WISH YOU BEST LUCK FOR
YOUR EXAMS !