CDM Federal Programs Corporation

I j

middot Ic-middotrebruary 22 1988

0k~rtl1 M Jlarpret Lelhen us Jnvir~tal trotection ~ 90 canal ltrMt add-trdUiVJ loeton M 02144 -ttgt

IPA CXImACT tl) 1 68-01-7331 rz (to Ir-r DOClRifl tlaquogta 1367-cG1~1

~~Planation of Data C)lalifiera for validated Organica Inorganic Data CUe No 8129 lilreaia lita DoQ~t Noaa 1367-IP-ampJNY-3 and T367-cG1-BP-IIND-1

In ruponM to your ~t I have reviftlld the data validation reporta prepared for the lilreaia lite in order to explain the data qualifierbull Uch wre applied and dHcribe the liaitationa of the data lbia _ranampbl containl thrM MCtionaa

1 DHcription of Data C)lalifieu 2 Interpretation of Organic Data validation - lallplea M828-M831 3 Interpretation of Inorganic Data validation -aplea IN427shy

IN430

1 have provided interpretation of the data validation reporta only in thoH inltancta are violationa of the validation critaria wre noted

note tbat the Orpnic Data validation Letter llpOrt IUIaitted to maklan of 119ion 1 on ocber 10 1987 hal been rnutitted

vitb correctiona follawiniJ a review by Deborah laaro atqional lallpleoantrol Olnter 1110 A copy of that IUIaittal ia tneloaed bull

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

M Margaret IAihen ~ 2

Data QUalifierbull are ~~ UMd during the data validation proce11 to clauffy laiiPle data u to t1 ccnfom~nCe to QC requir-ntl 1be t ~ qualifierbull are Uated belowr

o A - Acceptable

o J - lltiata qualitatively correct but quantitatively au~pect

o a- feet data not IUitable for any PlfPOH

o u - not detected at a ipeeified detection lillit (eg lOU)

llllple data ea be qualified with a bullJbull or bullabull for -ny clifferent tHIOill toor urrogate recovery blank canuination or calibration probl- ~other Wnga can cau~e Alllple data to be qualified In particular tbt Jbull ng i1 Uled to lnclicata that the carantration of an identified callpCU1d ia canaidered an utiate (eg 10J) or that tbt detection lillit ia only 1ft Htiate (ie WuJbull) be validation report lhauld be cloaely read in order to detandne the ultiata illpact of a bullJbull flag

In adllition tbt cloeer a value i1 to the detection lillit tbt mre illportlftt tbt qualification tcce1 beC8UM tbt larger tbt variance 11 in tbt utiatad cancentration ror Ulllllple an utiatad value of20000l J il problblfroee to tbt true value ile an utiatad value of 10 J ay ampe off 50 or re Altbouvb tbt data validator camot 911nti tbt varleoe data ur -t take tbHe factora into account wen evaluating the data

2 Intarpretaticm of OrJnic Data validation- cue Ho 1129

Ml-2---11

be of911lc data for thi1 cue ay be Uled witb qualificationa a to calibnticn violaticna blink canuiaation tnd poor urrogate recoveriea calibntion violati- ~ DOtact for ewaral CCIIICnll in tbt volatile -m-DUitile C ) lftd ticide frection lftd qualificationno-lldltl- an_ r ral of tbt volatile S -1-YOlatile apaalldl All data for bl1( thylbayl)pbtbalate are nc -5 to be

lfled to tion All acid tractable -1-YOlatile OIDOUDIII 1ft to be flegged u HtiatH U to

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

Ita Margaret Lelhen page 3

lurropte Rtcoveriet (Page 1 Paragraph 4)

surrogate apiklng CCIIIpOUnda are added to all ~~~~~plea and blanb before purging or extraction to Utor preparation and analyaia of tuplea If contractually-required recovery llalta are not bullt the laboratory 1a required to correct the prcblbull In thil cue two acid extractable fraction 11lrrogatea fell below the recovery llalta BowYer the laboratory 8Ufficiently ~trated that the prcblbull lay not in their inability to properly prepare the Ullple but in a bulltdx effect Wllch prewntea CCIIIPlete extraction of the surrogate CCIIpUMSa frca the ~e lberefore it wu rec IdeeS to flag all detection llalta for the acld extractable fraction in ~e AB831 u Htiatel tw date uaer lhould note that acid extractable ccapounda ay have been preMnt in the tuplebull but wre not identified u to the bulltrlx effect

Jlatrlx pikeAtrlx lp1k Duplicate (Page 2 Paragraph 1)

Jlatrlx effecta occur twn the IIIIPle CCIIIPC)eitlon interferebull with the analyala of the analyte(l) of intereat M1180 recovedea provide an Htiate of the aunt of blu preMnt in the uur-t ayata Many of the pntlcldt bulltrlx 8plke recovedea wre autlldt contractual Ualta pdbulldly u to undu-recovedH BowYer blcauM pntlcldta wre not ~tltated in thHe aplH the vlolatlona are canaldtred not to affect the pllty of the data lnd it la recbull ideeS to accept the pntlcldt data

rleld IDlicatel (11191 2 ragraph 2)

rleld amp~plicate aplH are not part of the lta~t of tlork but are UMd by the 1119ional data revlewr to evaluate the perforance of a laboratory In thl cue of 1011 aplH the potential for ~ dlatdbutlon of cantampNnta 11 bltb end therefore the field 6Jplicate rWta are not UMd to ~Uy thl data

])()OH ~r 1-10 ZITI1-1() ()H -iJ 0 JgtO -iJ 1-1111 ltI1111-1

0 OJgt lllr 0 00 00 00

0

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

bull Margaret Lelhen Page 4

Initial and COntinuil9 calibration (Page 2 Paragraph 11 Page 3)

Initial and continuing calibrationa allow a verification that the inatruMIt il capable of producing acceptable quantitative data lhe initial calibration daonatrate1 the inat~t il capable of acceptable perfomance at the beginning and a continuing calibration check1 ~tthat the IYitea contimbull to perfora reliably on a day-to-ltlay bull During both the initial and continuing calibrationa lyata rfornce ack OlllpMidl (DCCa) are analysed to inlure that the ainiaa relpOilH factorbull (lhl are being attained In thi1 cue the reepcnM factor for one volatile DCC (chlor~thane) wa llightly leu tbln the contact-required IF Although thi1 indicatebull that inlt~t perfornce wa not cptial the fact that the IF deviated frca the acceptance criteria only wully and chlor~thane wa not detected in the llllpln niUlted ln a reco ndation to accept the laboratorybull decl1ion to continae with analyMI vlthaut correcting the problbull

Following attau-tt of acceptable IYitea perfomance calibration CMck CCIIpcM1dl (CCCI) are U8ed to check the validity of the initial calibration lhe percent difference (to) in rnpanH factorbull for one volatile cxx calllpCUnd vinyl chloride wa outalde contractual criteria in the contirulng calibration lecauM vinyl chloride WI not detected in MfY of the llllplu lt il rec IdeeS to accept the laboratorybull decillon to contlue with analflil withaut correcting the problbull u it doebull not adverMly affect CCIIIIpCUnd quantitation

COntractual llllltl are Mt for rnponH factor percent relative 1Undard deviationa ( UIIDI) to and lh for all aL CCIIIIDCUidl (in ad4ition to criteria for the ucxa and cxca) On rege 3 of the o~c data validation letter report all ~are lilted that wre outalde theM lialtl ror a bullraquority of theM~ the calibration vlolatiaM rnulted in a ree- ation to flat the data u nUtn becaM the ~ wre correctly identified but the quantitation could not be canaiaered reliable be detection lllllt for the CCIIIIpCUnd 2-batmone WI recbull 11ded to be rejected tc the tftPCIbull factor wa 10 low that a lillit of detMtlon could not be dltendned

3 IDterpntatian of IDDrpic Data validatian- CUe bull 1119

MJn JNU7-fNUO

be lnof91nic dlta for thia -y be UMd without

- rr

callfl following narrative aplaSN the ratlanale UMd in~ ecceptable in IPite of YiolatiaM of contract criteria reference~ corrnpnt to the Data va1ldatian Letter 1M8

~()OHJr HO zm H(l (1H -13 0 ~n -IJ Hl11 ltI 111H

n 0~ mr n on 00 00

0

CDM Federal Programs Ogtrporation

Ma Margaret Leahen Pages

rield Duplicatebull (rage 2 rara9raph 6)

rield duplicate auplea are not part of the Statent of Work but are UMd by the R19ional data reviftlr to evaluate the perfomance of both the field collecticn tua and the laboratory In the caae of aoil auplea the potential for non-~ity in the IUipll ie 10 large that field duplicate reaultl are generally not UMd to qualify the data

Laboratory Duplicatebull (Page 2 Paragraph 7)

lhe reaultl of laboratory duplicate analyaea are an indicator of the preciaicn of the lllllple reaulta lhe ltatant of Work requirebull the laboratory to nag () the reaultl if the relative percent difference (UD) ia greater than 25 lhe alWiirul UD wa greater than 25 and the laboratory apprcpriately napeS the Al reaulta lhe critericn for acceptance under the 1M data validation CJUidelinea for 10111 ia 35 lecauM the Al UD wa 1 than 35 it la reo ndld to accept the alllilua data All other el~tl bullt the cllplicate analyaia data validaticn criteria and are reo ndld to be accepted

piked 1151bullbull (ftcJe 2 Paragraph 8)

lhe apiked llllple analyaia ia deaigned to provide inforaticn about the _) effecta of the lllllple bulltrix on the di911tlon and uu~t bullthodology

one of the factorbull wuch can inflUIDCI apiked lllllple ruulta ia the relative lvela of analyte in the apike and _te If the endogenaul lllllple lvel ia greater than four U the apike lvel the percent r8COftry rHUltl lhould not be conaidered accurate or IMd to juiSge the accuracy of~bull rHUlta ror thia reuon the lMd IHUltl are conaldend bullmiddot b bulllenl11 apike r8COftry aceedld the acceptanclcritericn of 12 but bullleni11 wa not detected in 1n1 of the llllplulberefore it 11 nc rt to accept the le data (all valuu 1 than the detection liait) u reported

lCP tnterfeRnCt Owck 51e (ftc)e 2 f119raph 9)

be lCP tnterfeRnCt Owck llllple lnalyail 11 perforMtd to verify tbt conuect laboratory1 correctian factora uaed to CCIIIIAte for interfeRnCt both betwen apecific el t Daira ant u to tmnS alpla ampariD the tCP IDalyail ror thia lno c tbt frequency of lnllyala of tbt Owck llllplu did not t the 10 f~ etitedcnbull _r the lllllpll canclfttratJGM of Al C h G 9 (~ lylnterfuift el-ntl) wre bull low that tbly w re belt not 1n d t re with thl ~t of ottr el ta tht ta for l llraquo c lnalytn wre canaidered ~~Ct-ma

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

M Margaret IAihen ~ 2

Data QUalifierbull are ~~ UMd during the data validation proce11 to clauffy laiiPle data u to t1 ccnfom~nCe to QC requir-ntl 1be t ~ qualifierbull are Uated belowr

o A - Acceptable

o J - lltiata qualitatively correct but quantitatively au~pect

o a- feet data not IUitable for any PlfPOH

o u - not detected at a ipeeified detection lillit (eg lOU)

llllple data ea be qualified with a bullJbull or bullabull for -ny clifferent tHIOill toor urrogate recovery blank canuination or calibration probl- ~other Wnga can cau~e Alllple data to be qualified In particular tbt Jbull ng i1 Uled to lnclicata that the carantration of an identified callpCU1d ia canaidered an utiate (eg 10J) or that tbt detection lillit ia only 1ft Htiate (ie WuJbull) be validation report lhauld be cloaely read in order to detandne the ultiata illpact of a bullJbull flag

In adllition tbt cloeer a value i1 to the detection lillit tbt mre illportlftt tbt qualification tcce1 beC8UM tbt larger tbt variance 11 in tbt utiatad cancentration ror Ulllllple an utiatad value of20000l J il problblfroee to tbt true value ile an utiatad value of 10 J ay ampe off 50 or re Altbouvb tbt data validator camot 911nti tbt varleoe data ur -t take tbHe factora into account wen evaluating the data

2 Intarpretaticm of OrJnic Data validation- cue Ho 1129

Ml-2---11

be of911lc data for thi1 cue ay be Uled witb qualificationa a to calibnticn violaticna blink canuiaation tnd poor urrogate recoveriea calibntion violati- ~ DOtact for ewaral CCIIICnll in tbt volatile -m-DUitile C ) lftd ticide frection lftd qualificationno-lldltl- an_ r ral of tbt volatile S -1-YOlatile apaalldl All data for bl1( thylbayl)pbtbalate are nc -5 to be

lfled to tion All acid tractable -1-YOlatile OIDOUDIII 1ft to be flegged u HtiatH U to

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

Ita Margaret Lelhen page 3

lurropte Rtcoveriet (Page 1 Paragraph 4)

surrogate apiklng CCIIIpOUnda are added to all ~~~~~plea and blanb before purging or extraction to Utor preparation and analyaia of tuplea If contractually-required recovery llalta are not bullt the laboratory 1a required to correct the prcblbull In thil cue two acid extractable fraction 11lrrogatea fell below the recovery llalta BowYer the laboratory 8Ufficiently ~trated that the prcblbull lay not in their inability to properly prepare the Ullple but in a bulltdx effect Wllch prewntea CCIIIPlete extraction of the surrogate CCIIpUMSa frca the ~e lberefore it wu rec IdeeS to flag all detection llalta for the acld extractable fraction in ~e AB831 u Htiatel tw date uaer lhould note that acid extractable ccapounda ay have been preMnt in the tuplebull but wre not identified u to the bulltrlx effect

Jlatrlx pikeAtrlx lp1k Duplicate (Page 2 Paragraph 1)

Jlatrlx effecta occur twn the IIIIPle CCIIIPC)eitlon interferebull with the analyala of the analyte(l) of intereat M1180 recovedea provide an Htiate of the aunt of blu preMnt in the uur-t ayata Many of the pntlcldt bulltrlx 8plke recovedea wre autlldt contractual Ualta pdbulldly u to undu-recovedH BowYer blcauM pntlcldta wre not ~tltated in thHe aplH the vlolatlona are canaldtred not to affect the pllty of the data lnd it la recbull ideeS to accept the pntlcldt data

rleld IDlicatel (11191 2 ragraph 2)

rleld amp~plicate aplH are not part of the lta~t of tlork but are UMd by the 1119ional data revlewr to evaluate the perforance of a laboratory In thl cue of 1011 aplH the potential for ~ dlatdbutlon of cantampNnta 11 bltb end therefore the field 6Jplicate rWta are not UMd to ~Uy thl data

])()OH ~r 1-10 ZITI1-1() ()H -iJ 0 JgtO -iJ 1-1111 ltI1111-1

0 OJgt lllr 0 00 00 00

0

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

bull Margaret Lelhen Page 4

Initial and COntinuil9 calibration (Page 2 Paragraph 11 Page 3)

Initial and continuing calibrationa allow a verification that the inatruMIt il capable of producing acceptable quantitative data lhe initial calibration daonatrate1 the inat~t il capable of acceptable perfomance at the beginning and a continuing calibration check1 ~tthat the IYitea contimbull to perfora reliably on a day-to-ltlay bull During both the initial and continuing calibrationa lyata rfornce ack OlllpMidl (DCCa) are analysed to inlure that the ainiaa relpOilH factorbull (lhl are being attained In thi1 cue the reepcnM factor for one volatile DCC (chlor~thane) wa llightly leu tbln the contact-required IF Although thi1 indicatebull that inlt~t perfornce wa not cptial the fact that the IF deviated frca the acceptance criteria only wully and chlor~thane wa not detected in the llllpln niUlted ln a reco ndation to accept the laboratorybull decl1ion to continae with analyMI vlthaut correcting the problbull

Following attau-tt of acceptable IYitea perfomance calibration CMck CCIIpcM1dl (CCCI) are U8ed to check the validity of the initial calibration lhe percent difference (to) in rnpanH factorbull for one volatile cxx calllpCUnd vinyl chloride wa outalde contractual criteria in the contirulng calibration lecauM vinyl chloride WI not detected in MfY of the llllplu lt il rec IdeeS to accept the laboratorybull decillon to contlue with analflil withaut correcting the problbull u it doebull not adverMly affect CCIIIIpCUnd quantitation

COntractual llllltl are Mt for rnponH factor percent relative 1Undard deviationa ( UIIDI) to and lh for all aL CCIIIIDCUidl (in ad4ition to criteria for the ucxa and cxca) On rege 3 of the o~c data validation letter report all ~are lilted that wre outalde theM lialtl ror a bullraquority of theM~ the calibration vlolatiaM rnulted in a ree- ation to flat the data u nUtn becaM the ~ wre correctly identified but the quantitation could not be canaiaered reliable be detection lllllt for the CCIIIIpCUnd 2-batmone WI recbull 11ded to be rejected tc the tftPCIbull factor wa 10 low that a lillit of detMtlon could not be dltendned

3 IDterpntatian of IDDrpic Data validatian- CUe bull 1119

MJn JNU7-fNUO

be lnof91nic dlta for thia -y be UMd without

- rr

callfl following narrative aplaSN the ratlanale UMd in~ ecceptable in IPite of YiolatiaM of contract criteria reference~ corrnpnt to the Data va1ldatian Letter 1M8

~()OHJr HO zm H(l (1H -13 0 ~n -IJ Hl11 ltI 111H

n 0~ mr n on 00 00

0

CDM Federal Programs Ogtrporation

Ma Margaret Leahen Pages

rield Duplicatebull (rage 2 rara9raph 6)

rield duplicate auplea are not part of the Statent of Work but are UMd by the R19ional data reviftlr to evaluate the perfomance of both the field collecticn tua and the laboratory In the caae of aoil auplea the potential for non-~ity in the IUipll ie 10 large that field duplicate reaultl are generally not UMd to qualify the data

Laboratory Duplicatebull (Page 2 Paragraph 7)

lhe reaultl of laboratory duplicate analyaea are an indicator of the preciaicn of the lllllple reaulta lhe ltatant of Work requirebull the laboratory to nag () the reaultl if the relative percent difference (UD) ia greater than 25 lhe alWiirul UD wa greater than 25 and the laboratory apprcpriately napeS the Al reaulta lhe critericn for acceptance under the 1M data validation CJUidelinea for 10111 ia 35 lecauM the Al UD wa 1 than 35 it la reo ndld to accept the alllilua data All other el~tl bullt the cllplicate analyaia data validaticn criteria and are reo ndld to be accepted

piked 1151bullbull (ftcJe 2 Paragraph 8)

lhe apiked llllple analyaia ia deaigned to provide inforaticn about the _) effecta of the lllllple bulltrix on the di911tlon and uu~t bullthodology

one of the factorbull wuch can inflUIDCI apiked lllllple ruulta ia the relative lvela of analyte in the apike and _te If the endogenaul lllllple lvel ia greater than four U the apike lvel the percent r8COftry rHUltl lhould not be conaidered accurate or IMd to juiSge the accuracy of~bull rHUlta ror thia reuon the lMd IHUltl are conaldend bullmiddot b bulllenl11 apike r8COftry aceedld the acceptanclcritericn of 12 but bullleni11 wa not detected in 1n1 of the llllplulberefore it 11 nc rt to accept the le data (all valuu 1 than the detection liait) u reported

lCP tnterfeRnCt Owck 51e (ftc)e 2 f119raph 9)

be lCP tnterfeRnCt Owck llllple lnalyail 11 perforMtd to verify tbt conuect laboratory1 correctian factora uaed to CCIIIIAte for interfeRnCt both betwen apecific el t Daira ant u to tmnS alpla ampariD the tCP IDalyail ror thia lno c tbt frequency of lnllyala of tbt Owck llllplu did not t the 10 f~ etitedcnbull _r the lllllpll canclfttratJGM of Al C h G 9 (~ lylnterfuift el-ntl) wre bull low that tbly w re belt not 1n d t re with thl ~t of ottr el ta tht ta for l llraquo c lnalytn wre canaidered ~~Ct-ma

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

Ita Margaret Lelhen page 3

lurropte Rtcoveriet (Page 1 Paragraph 4)

surrogate apiklng CCIIIpOUnda are added to all ~~~~~plea and blanb before purging or extraction to Utor preparation and analyaia of tuplea If contractually-required recovery llalta are not bullt the laboratory 1a required to correct the prcblbull In thil cue two acid extractable fraction 11lrrogatea fell below the recovery llalta BowYer the laboratory 8Ufficiently ~trated that the prcblbull lay not in their inability to properly prepare the Ullple but in a bulltdx effect Wllch prewntea CCIIIPlete extraction of the surrogate CCIIpUMSa frca the ~e lberefore it wu rec IdeeS to flag all detection llalta for the acld extractable fraction in ~e AB831 u Htiatel tw date uaer lhould note that acid extractable ccapounda ay have been preMnt in the tuplebull but wre not identified u to the bulltrlx effect

Jlatrlx pikeAtrlx lp1k Duplicate (Page 2 Paragraph 1)

Jlatrlx effecta occur twn the IIIIPle CCIIIPC)eitlon interferebull with the analyala of the analyte(l) of intereat M1180 recovedea provide an Htiate of the aunt of blu preMnt in the uur-t ayata Many of the pntlcldt bulltrlx 8plke recovedea wre autlldt contractual Ualta pdbulldly u to undu-recovedH BowYer blcauM pntlcldta wre not ~tltated in thHe aplH the vlolatlona are canaldtred not to affect the pllty of the data lnd it la recbull ideeS to accept the pntlcldt data

rleld IDlicatel (11191 2 ragraph 2)

rleld amp~plicate aplH are not part of the lta~t of tlork but are UMd by the 1119ional data revlewr to evaluate the perforance of a laboratory In thl cue of 1011 aplH the potential for ~ dlatdbutlon of cantampNnta 11 bltb end therefore the field 6Jplicate rWta are not UMd to ~Uy thl data

])()OH ~r 1-10 ZITI1-1() ()H -iJ 0 JgtO -iJ 1-1111 ltI1111-1

0 OJgt lllr 0 00 00 00

0

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

bull Margaret Lelhen Page 4

Initial and COntinuil9 calibration (Page 2 Paragraph 11 Page 3)

Initial and continuing calibrationa allow a verification that the inatruMIt il capable of producing acceptable quantitative data lhe initial calibration daonatrate1 the inat~t il capable of acceptable perfomance at the beginning and a continuing calibration check1 ~tthat the IYitea contimbull to perfora reliably on a day-to-ltlay bull During both the initial and continuing calibrationa lyata rfornce ack OlllpMidl (DCCa) are analysed to inlure that the ainiaa relpOilH factorbull (lhl are being attained In thi1 cue the reepcnM factor for one volatile DCC (chlor~thane) wa llightly leu tbln the contact-required IF Although thi1 indicatebull that inlt~t perfornce wa not cptial the fact that the IF deviated frca the acceptance criteria only wully and chlor~thane wa not detected in the llllpln niUlted ln a reco ndation to accept the laboratorybull decl1ion to continae with analyMI vlthaut correcting the problbull

Following attau-tt of acceptable IYitea perfomance calibration CMck CCIIpcM1dl (CCCI) are U8ed to check the validity of the initial calibration lhe percent difference (to) in rnpanH factorbull for one volatile cxx calllpCUnd vinyl chloride wa outalde contractual criteria in the contirulng calibration lecauM vinyl chloride WI not detected in MfY of the llllplu lt il rec IdeeS to accept the laboratorybull decillon to contlue with analflil withaut correcting the problbull u it doebull not adverMly affect CCIIIIpCUnd quantitation

COntractual llllltl are Mt for rnponH factor percent relative 1Undard deviationa ( UIIDI) to and lh for all aL CCIIIIDCUidl (in ad4ition to criteria for the ucxa and cxca) On rege 3 of the o~c data validation letter report all ~are lilted that wre outalde theM lialtl ror a bullraquority of theM~ the calibration vlolatiaM rnulted in a ree- ation to flat the data u nUtn becaM the ~ wre correctly identified but the quantitation could not be canaiaered reliable be detection lllllt for the CCIIIIpCUnd 2-batmone WI recbull 11ded to be rejected tc the tftPCIbull factor wa 10 low that a lillit of detMtlon could not be dltendned

3 IDterpntatian of IDDrpic Data validatian- CUe bull 1119

MJn JNU7-fNUO

be lnof91nic dlta for thia -y be UMd without

- rr

callfl following narrative aplaSN the ratlanale UMd in~ ecceptable in IPite of YiolatiaM of contract criteria reference~ corrnpnt to the Data va1ldatian Letter 1M8

~()OHJr HO zm H(l (1H -13 0 ~n -IJ Hl11 ltI 111H

n 0~ mr n on 00 00

0

CDM Federal Programs Ogtrporation

Ma Margaret Leahen Pages

rield Duplicatebull (rage 2 rara9raph 6)

rield duplicate auplea are not part of the Statent of Work but are UMd by the R19ional data reviftlr to evaluate the perfomance of both the field collecticn tua and the laboratory In the caae of aoil auplea the potential for non-~ity in the IUipll ie 10 large that field duplicate reaultl are generally not UMd to qualify the data

Laboratory Duplicatebull (Page 2 Paragraph 7)

lhe reaultl of laboratory duplicate analyaea are an indicator of the preciaicn of the lllllple reaulta lhe ltatant of Work requirebull the laboratory to nag () the reaultl if the relative percent difference (UD) ia greater than 25 lhe alWiirul UD wa greater than 25 and the laboratory apprcpriately napeS the Al reaulta lhe critericn for acceptance under the 1M data validation CJUidelinea for 10111 ia 35 lecauM the Al UD wa 1 than 35 it la reo ndld to accept the alllilua data All other el~tl bullt the cllplicate analyaia data validaticn criteria and are reo ndld to be accepted

piked 1151bullbull (ftcJe 2 Paragraph 8)

lhe apiked llllple analyaia ia deaigned to provide inforaticn about the _) effecta of the lllllple bulltrix on the di911tlon and uu~t bullthodology

one of the factorbull wuch can inflUIDCI apiked lllllple ruulta ia the relative lvela of analyte in the apike and _te If the endogenaul lllllple lvel ia greater than four U the apike lvel the percent r8COftry rHUltl lhould not be conaidered accurate or IMd to juiSge the accuracy of~bull rHUlta ror thia reuon the lMd IHUltl are conaldend bullmiddot b bulllenl11 apike r8COftry aceedld the acceptanclcritericn of 12 but bullleni11 wa not detected in 1n1 of the llllplulberefore it 11 nc rt to accept the le data (all valuu 1 than the detection liait) u reported

lCP tnterfeRnCt Owck 51e (ftc)e 2 f119raph 9)

be lCP tnterfeRnCt Owck llllple lnalyail 11 perforMtd to verify tbt conuect laboratory1 correctian factora uaed to CCIIIIAte for interfeRnCt both betwen apecific el t Daira ant u to tmnS alpla ampariD the tCP IDalyail ror thia lno c tbt frequency of lnllyala of tbt Owck llllplu did not t the 10 f~ etitedcnbull _r the lllllpll canclfttratJGM of Al C h G 9 (~ lylnterfuift el-ntl) wre bull low that tbly w re belt not 1n d t re with thl ~t of ottr el ta tht ta for l llraquo c lnalytn wre canaidered ~~Ct-ma

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

bull Margaret Lelhen Page 4

Initial and COntinuil9 calibration (Page 2 Paragraph 11 Page 3)

Initial and continuing calibrationa allow a verification that the inatruMIt il capable of producing acceptable quantitative data lhe initial calibration daonatrate1 the inat~t il capable of acceptable perfomance at the beginning and a continuing calibration check1 ~tthat the IYitea contimbull to perfora reliably on a day-to-ltlay bull During both the initial and continuing calibrationa lyata rfornce ack OlllpMidl (DCCa) are analysed to inlure that the ainiaa relpOilH factorbull (lhl are being attained In thi1 cue the reepcnM factor for one volatile DCC (chlor~thane) wa llightly leu tbln the contact-required IF Although thi1 indicatebull that inlt~t perfornce wa not cptial the fact that the IF deviated frca the acceptance criteria only wully and chlor~thane wa not detected in the llllpln niUlted ln a reco ndation to accept the laboratorybull decl1ion to continae with analyMI vlthaut correcting the problbull

Following attau-tt of acceptable IYitea perfomance calibration CMck CCIIpcM1dl (CCCI) are U8ed to check the validity of the initial calibration lhe percent difference (to) in rnpanH factorbull for one volatile cxx calllpCUnd vinyl chloride wa outalde contractual criteria in the contirulng calibration lecauM vinyl chloride WI not detected in MfY of the llllplu lt il rec IdeeS to accept the laboratorybull decillon to contlue with analflil withaut correcting the problbull u it doebull not adverMly affect CCIIIIpCUnd quantitation

COntractual llllltl are Mt for rnponH factor percent relative 1Undard deviationa ( UIIDI) to and lh for all aL CCIIIIDCUidl (in ad4ition to criteria for the ucxa and cxca) On rege 3 of the o~c data validation letter report all ~are lilted that wre outalde theM lialtl ror a bullraquority of theM~ the calibration vlolatiaM rnulted in a ree- ation to flat the data u nUtn becaM the ~ wre correctly identified but the quantitation could not be canaiaered reliable be detection lllllt for the CCIIIIpCUnd 2-batmone WI recbull 11ded to be rejected tc the tftPCIbull factor wa 10 low that a lillit of detMtlon could not be dltendned

3 IDterpntatian of IDDrpic Data validatian- CUe bull 1119

MJn JNU7-fNUO

be lnof91nic dlta for thia -y be UMd without

- rr

callfl following narrative aplaSN the ratlanale UMd in~ ecceptable in IPite of YiolatiaM of contract criteria reference~ corrnpnt to the Data va1ldatian Letter 1M8

~()OHJr HO zm H(l (1H -13 0 ~n -IJ Hl11 ltI 111H

n 0~ mr n on 00 00

0

CDM Federal Programs Ogtrporation

Ma Margaret Leahen Pages

rield Duplicatebull (rage 2 rara9raph 6)

rield duplicate auplea are not part of the Statent of Work but are UMd by the R19ional data reviftlr to evaluate the perfomance of both the field collecticn tua and the laboratory In the caae of aoil auplea the potential for non-~ity in the IUipll ie 10 large that field duplicate reaultl are generally not UMd to qualify the data

Laboratory Duplicatebull (Page 2 Paragraph 7)

lhe reaultl of laboratory duplicate analyaea are an indicator of the preciaicn of the lllllple reaulta lhe ltatant of Work requirebull the laboratory to nag () the reaultl if the relative percent difference (UD) ia greater than 25 lhe alWiirul UD wa greater than 25 and the laboratory apprcpriately napeS the Al reaulta lhe critericn for acceptance under the 1M data validation CJUidelinea for 10111 ia 35 lecauM the Al UD wa 1 than 35 it la reo ndld to accept the alllilua data All other el~tl bullt the cllplicate analyaia data validaticn criteria and are reo ndld to be accepted

piked 1151bullbull (ftcJe 2 Paragraph 8)

lhe apiked llllple analyaia ia deaigned to provide inforaticn about the _) effecta of the lllllple bulltrix on the di911tlon and uu~t bullthodology

one of the factorbull wuch can inflUIDCI apiked lllllple ruulta ia the relative lvela of analyte in the apike and _te If the endogenaul lllllple lvel ia greater than four U the apike lvel the percent r8COftry rHUltl lhould not be conaidered accurate or IMd to juiSge the accuracy of~bull rHUlta ror thia reuon the lMd IHUltl are conaldend bullmiddot b bulllenl11 apike r8COftry aceedld the acceptanclcritericn of 12 but bullleni11 wa not detected in 1n1 of the llllplulberefore it 11 nc rt to accept the le data (all valuu 1 than the detection liait) u reported

lCP tnterfeRnCt Owck 51e (ftc)e 2 f119raph 9)

be lCP tnterfeRnCt Owck llllple lnalyail 11 perforMtd to verify tbt conuect laboratory1 correctian factora uaed to CCIIIIAte for interfeRnCt both betwen apecific el t Daira ant u to tmnS alpla ampariD the tCP IDalyail ror thia lno c tbt frequency of lnllyala of tbt Owck llllplu did not t the 10 f~ etitedcnbull _r the lllllpll canclfttratJGM of Al C h G 9 (~ lylnterfuift el-ntl) wre bull low that tbly w re belt not 1n d t re with thl ~t of ottr el ta tht ta for l llraquo c lnalytn wre canaidered ~~Ct-ma

CDM Federal Programs Ogtrporation

Ma Margaret Leahen Pages

rield Duplicatebull (rage 2 rara9raph 6)

rield duplicate auplea are not part of the Statent of Work but are UMd by the R19ional data reviftlr to evaluate the perfomance of both the field collecticn tua and the laboratory In the caae of aoil auplea the potential for non-~ity in the IUipll ie 10 large that field duplicate reaultl are generally not UMd to qualify the data

Laboratory Duplicatebull (Page 2 Paragraph 7)

lhe reaultl of laboratory duplicate analyaea are an indicator of the preciaicn of the lllllple reaulta lhe ltatant of Work requirebull the laboratory to nag () the reaultl if the relative percent difference (UD) ia greater than 25 lhe alWiirul UD wa greater than 25 and the laboratory apprcpriately napeS the Al reaulta lhe critericn for acceptance under the 1M data validation CJUidelinea for 10111 ia 35 lecauM the Al UD wa 1 than 35 it la reo ndld to accept the alllilua data All other el~tl bullt the cllplicate analyaia data validaticn criteria and are reo ndld to be accepted

piked 1151bullbull (ftcJe 2 Paragraph 8)

lhe apiked llllple analyaia ia deaigned to provide inforaticn about the _) effecta of the lllllple bulltrix on the di911tlon and uu~t bullthodology

one of the factorbull wuch can inflUIDCI apiked lllllple ruulta ia the relative lvela of analyte in the apike and _te If the endogenaul lllllple lvel ia greater than four U the apike lvel the percent r8COftry rHUltl lhould not be conaidered accurate or IMd to juiSge the accuracy of~bull rHUlta ror thia reuon the lMd IHUltl are conaldend bullmiddot b bulllenl11 apike r8COftry aceedld the acceptanclcritericn of 12 but bullleni11 wa not detected in 1n1 of the llllplulberefore it 11 nc rt to accept the le data (all valuu 1 than the detection liait) u reported

lCP tnterfeRnCt Owck 51e (ftc)e 2 f119raph 9)

be lCP tnterfeRnCt Owck llllple lnalyail 11 perforMtd to verify tbt conuect laboratory1 correctian factora uaed to CCIIIIAte for interfeRnCt both betwen apecific el t Daira ant u to tmnS alpla ampariD the tCP IDalyail ror thia lno c tbt frequency of lnllyala of tbt Owck llllplu did not t the 10 f~ etitedcnbull _r the lllllpll canclfttratJGM of Al C h G 9 (~ lylnterfuift el-ntl) wre bull low that tbly w re belt not 1n d t re with thl ~t of ottr el ta tht ta for l llraquo c lnalytn wre canaidered ~~Ct-ma

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

M ltlr~ret Lelhen hge 6

In -ry the data qualifierbull are tooll with which technical and ccmtractual CCIIPllance are valuated and care t be taken in the uaea -de of validated data 1tw orpnic reaultl for CUe Ho 8129 ay be UHd with a few qualiflcatlcna ile the inorpnlc data My be UHd without qualiflera

If you haw any further queatlcna or require 80re lnforatlcn plHH fbulll frbull to ccntact bull at (617) n2-2659

llncerely

all rederal trogr-

KM_ LS~ laren L ltane lnYi~tallcientlat

lbcloaure

ILiarf

cca arry IUtler all rederal fr09r- Dlplty Progrbull llm)erJ Dlborllb llaro Jalgianal lllllple Control Clnter Dlplty troject Officer lCibn tlalbr all hderal trogr- Oorporatlcn Jalgianal IIIMgMr

CDM Federal Programs Corporation February 19 1988

MI Nancy Barmakian us Environmental Protection Agency90 canal Street aoatoq M 02114

EPA CCJflMCT tlgt 68-01-7331

DOCliiiN1 tl) l T367-co1-IP-BJNV-3

SUBJECTs caae 8129 Four Low Level Soil Bamplea ~lea M828 - AH831 Collected by CUp Dre11er MeitH Inc c-bridge Analytlcal Aaaociatea Contract I 68-01-7278 TIS III Work AalignMnt No 367 Silreaia Site

Dear MI Barakians

A Level OW validation val perforMlt on the organic analytical data froa four low level toil Hq)lta collected by ceq Dre11er MeitH Inc at the Silreaia aite be data were evaluated baaed on the following parterll

-data COIIIpleteneaa -surrogate ~ike reaultl -aatrix apike reiUltl -duplicate analyail reaulta -blank analyah reiUltl -Dr1PP and an reiUltl -holding t~l -inat~nt calibration (initial and eontinuing) -inat~nt detection liaitl

Table I ~rilea the validation reccDtndationa vhieh wre baNd on the following inforatlon

Bolding t~l and tuning requlrntl wre reviewd and found to be ecceptable 1M date of peatieide analyaea for lulple M830 bullbull reported enoneouely u 101117 inatead of 1019187 on the ONll

IUrrogate reccwriea were reviewd and all~ bueftWltral and peetieide It valua were vi thin eontractual lialta In the acid extractable fraction for lallple Mill 2-fluorophtnol WI ftSer-recoverecS and the 246-tdbr~l It WI 1 than 10 1M laboratory noted that the

5oblbull with 246-trlbr~IOl WI a to a Mtrix effect u indicated low reccwry in theM n 1110 In ltion they noted hi- levela of

t(2-etbylhexyl)phthalate in the -ich wre not urecS In the bulltrixIIID

epilte or he native llllple h laboratory haa aince tvitched the volatile blri eon it ueea to deteralne acid aurropte reccwrlea and

hal found bull recoveriea lbtrefore it 11 recbull rded to flat the ld utr volatile NIUJta (all ncn-dltecta) u eatiMtea (uJ)

1ft bull

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

Ms Barmakian February 19 1988 Page 1Wo

MSMSD data were reviewed and all VOP banlneutral and acid extractable apike ~were within contractual liaita Percent recoveriea were outaide QC liaita for aany of the peaticide a pike ~middot However becaun no peaticidea were detected in the AJ111lea it il reca~~~~~nded to accept all MSMSD data

~lea M829 and M830 were the field duplicate HJII)lea 1be RPDI for fluoranthene (37) indeno(123-cd)pyrene (43) and benao(ghi)perylene (39) excttded the 32 criterion for banntutral extractablebull in aoil Due to the heterogeneity of aoil aamplea concluaiona drawn froa field duplicate Cltlllpariaona are of lillited value and therefore no r~ndation ia llade

rive bullthod blanka (two volatile one aeaivolatile two peaticide) were included in thil data package 1be following ~rhea what waa found in thoH blankl (ugkg) I

Laboratory blanka

8709234-081 bi1(2-ethylhtxyl)phthalate 180J

Taking into conaideration then blank levell a prelillinary reccndation for thia data Itt i11

bia(2-ethylhtxyl)phthalatel a lt 1800 uglkg gt J gt 3600A DL bull 1800 uJ

rield and trip blank data wre not included in thia data Mt

Detection llllit reaulta wre prennt be laboratory did not reportconcentration 1lta for volatllea or Maivolatllea and therefore they could not be evaluated be detection lillita for peaticldea wre reported ln llicr09raM It ia riOIYJndtd that all detection lillita be reported in uglkg

lni till and continuing calibration data vere revlewd and are -rbed below One volatile IJICC (chlorcthlne) wa outaide QC criteria in the lnitlal calibration In addition vinyl chloride (CCC) wa outaide QC criteria in the contiruing calibration tbttr their contract the laboratory il required to eorrect the prcblbull before rrforlling ~e enalyaea but tty did not leQuM the laboratory d1 not detect theM CCIIpCIUftda in the NIIPlebull it il reccbullbullndtd to ~ the data but to rport the detection llllita for the CCIIIpOUnda u Ht tea (uJ)

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

MI Barmakian February 19 1988 Page lbree

lbe following ummarize1 initial and continuing calibration analytea out1ide QC requirementas

~ (~ all datar J(+) R(ND))

ehloraaethane vinyl chloride ehloroethane acetone 2-butanone 2-hexanone 4-Mthyl-2-pentanone

Aa1ociated aamp1els

1M ( J all data) z sri(2-ehloroethyl )ether ilopheroneaeenaphthylene24-dlnitrotoluene ctiethylphthalate 4-n1troan111ne 46-dinitro-o-ereiOl btnloie acid 4-ctlloroaniline lr -cUehlorobenaictine

AaiOCiated Allplelz

IIIT ( no pUeide1 quantitated - accept all detection liaita) leta-IIIC 0 IIIC Heptachlor epoxide tnaoeulfan I Dieldrin 44-DDT

MIOeiatad ~ebullbull

91087

1015187

M828-M8ll

1029187

bull bull

bull

bullbull

tlcide data wre nviewd and f~ to be bull difference (D) bttwen calibration factors clarint the WI evaluatad on the confilMtion col~ an4 middotthe tDI o wre 91Ntar than the 20 cdtaron aw middotcc-Mdatlbullana btcluM peetlcidel wre not quantlta

CDM Federal ProgrclffiS Corpgtration

MI lamakian February 19 1988 Page rour

A calculation check wa1 perfoflllltd on tetrachloroethene and bit(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate in ~le AH829 and the reported value1 of 35 UCJ1k9 and 20000 UCJikg retpectively ware reproducible Mall Spectral bulltchlng quality va1 checked and found to be acceptable

I have enclond that data package 10 you can mark it a1 appropriate

Sincerely

CDM rderal Program~ Corporation

KGl- l Sh-M_ Karen L stone lnYironental lcientilt

lnclowre1

cca Deborah Szaro

_

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

Ma Banukian February 19 1988 Page rive

CASE 8129

TMLE I NXXJIIIIDmMI~ StiiWY

SMPLEmiddot PBST~ A1 A12 A1AH828 A1

A1 A12 A1M829 A1

A1 A12 A1 A1AH830

A1 A12 A1J A1Mill

A accept

A1 accept but bullJbull calibration violatiana

A2 accept but fora bil(2-ethylhexyl)phthalatea R lt 1800Ugkg gt J gt 3600 A DL bull 1800 uJ

A accept but bulluJbull all detection liaita

CDM FedelCll Programs CorpolCltion

Ma Bat1111lkian February 19 1988 Page Six

Joi)IS

NI829-BM-RICa Significant bulltdx effect11 baMline riM fraa 1ean 22-36 TIC1 po1itively identified 2(3H)furanone dihydro lhould be

rejected due to blank contlldnation

M83G-BNP-IUCI Significant trix effect11 baMline riM froa 1can 22-36 Wtak tpectra for indeno(l23-cd)pyrene benao(ghi) shyperylene Milling 1pectra for dibenao(ah)anthracene

TIC I Po1itively identified 2(3H)furanone dUl)dro lhould be rejected due to blank contlldnation

M831-~-IUCI Po11ible trix effect11 alight baMline riM froa lean 27-30

TIC I Politively identified 2(3H)furanone dihydro and 1-brco-4-chlorobennne lhould be rejected due to blank contlldnation

1. barcode 569056
2. barcodetext SDMS Doc ID 569056

CDM Federal Programs Corporation February 19 1988

MI Nancy Barmakian us Environmental Protection Agency90 canal Street aoatoq M 02114

EPA CCJflMCT tlgt 68-01-7331

DOCliiiN1 tl) l T367-co1-IP-BJNV-3

SUBJECTs caae 8129 Four Low Level Soil Bamplea ~lea M828 - AH831 Collected by CUp Dre11er MeitH Inc c-bridge Analytlcal Aaaociatea Contract I 68-01-7278 TIS III Work AalignMnt No 367 Silreaia Site

Dear MI Barakians

A Level OW validation val perforMlt on the organic analytical data froa four low level toil Hq)lta collected by ceq Dre11er MeitH Inc at the Silreaia aite be data were evaluated baaed on the following parterll

-data COIIIpleteneaa -surrogate ~ike reaultl -aatrix apike reiUltl -duplicate analyail reaulta -blank analyah reiUltl -Dr1PP and an reiUltl -holding t~l -inat~nt calibration (initial and eontinuing) -inat~nt detection liaitl

Table I ~rilea the validation reccDtndationa vhieh wre baNd on the following inforatlon

Bolding t~l and tuning requlrntl wre reviewd and found to be ecceptable 1M date of peatieide analyaea for lulple M830 bullbull reported enoneouely u 101117 inatead of 1019187 on the ONll

IUrrogate reccwriea were reviewd and all~ bueftWltral and peetieide It valua were vi thin eontractual lialta In the acid extractable fraction for lallple Mill 2-fluorophtnol WI ftSer-recoverecS and the 246-tdbr~l It WI 1 than 10 1M laboratory noted that the

5oblbull with 246-trlbr~IOl WI a to a Mtrix effect u indicated low reccwry in theM n 1110 In ltion they noted hi- levela of

t(2-etbylhexyl)phthalate in the -ich wre not urecS In the bulltrixIIID

epilte or he native llllple h laboratory haa aince tvitched the volatile blri eon it ueea to deteralne acid aurropte reccwrlea and

hal found bull recoveriea lbtrefore it 11 recbull rded to flat the ld utr volatile NIUJta (all ncn-dltecta) u eatiMtea (uJ)

1ft bull

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

Ms Barmakian February 19 1988 Page 1Wo

MSMSD data were reviewed and all VOP banlneutral and acid extractable apike ~were within contractual liaita Percent recoveriea were outaide QC liaita for aany of the peaticide a pike ~middot However becaun no peaticidea were detected in the AJ111lea it il reca~~~~~nded to accept all MSMSD data

~lea M829 and M830 were the field duplicate HJII)lea 1be RPDI for fluoranthene (37) indeno(123-cd)pyrene (43) and benao(ghi)perylene (39) excttded the 32 criterion for banntutral extractablebull in aoil Due to the heterogeneity of aoil aamplea concluaiona drawn froa field duplicate Cltlllpariaona are of lillited value and therefore no r~ndation ia llade

rive bullthod blanka (two volatile one aeaivolatile two peaticide) were included in thil data package 1be following ~rhea what waa found in thoH blankl (ugkg) I

Laboratory blanka

8709234-081 bi1(2-ethylhtxyl)phthalate 180J

Taking into conaideration then blank levell a prelillinary reccndation for thia data Itt i11

bia(2-ethylhtxyl)phthalatel a lt 1800 uglkg gt J gt 3600A DL bull 1800 uJ

rield and trip blank data wre not included in thia data Mt

Detection llllit reaulta wre prennt be laboratory did not reportconcentration 1lta for volatllea or Maivolatllea and therefore they could not be evaluated be detection lillita for peaticldea wre reported ln llicr09raM It ia riOIYJndtd that all detection lillita be reported in uglkg

lni till and continuing calibration data vere revlewd and are -rbed below One volatile IJICC (chlorcthlne) wa outaide QC criteria in the lnitlal calibration In addition vinyl chloride (CCC) wa outaide QC criteria in the contiruing calibration tbttr their contract the laboratory il required to eorrect the prcblbull before rrforlling ~e enalyaea but tty did not leQuM the laboratory d1 not detect theM CCIIpCIUftda in the NIIPlebull it il reccbullbullndtd to ~ the data but to rport the detection llllita for the CCIIIpOUnda u Ht tea (uJ)

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

MI Barmakian February 19 1988 Page lbree

lbe following ummarize1 initial and continuing calibration analytea out1ide QC requirementas

~ (~ all datar J(+) R(ND))

ehloraaethane vinyl chloride ehloroethane acetone 2-butanone 2-hexanone 4-Mthyl-2-pentanone

Aa1ociated aamp1els

1M ( J all data) z sri(2-ehloroethyl )ether ilopheroneaeenaphthylene24-dlnitrotoluene ctiethylphthalate 4-n1troan111ne 46-dinitro-o-ereiOl btnloie acid 4-ctlloroaniline lr -cUehlorobenaictine

AaiOCiated Allplelz

IIIT ( no pUeide1 quantitated - accept all detection liaita) leta-IIIC 0 IIIC Heptachlor epoxide tnaoeulfan I Dieldrin 44-DDT

MIOeiatad ~ebullbull

91087

1015187

M828-M8ll

1029187

bull bull

bull

bullbull

tlcide data wre nviewd and f~ to be bull difference (D) bttwen calibration factors clarint the WI evaluatad on the confilMtion col~ an4 middotthe tDI o wre 91Ntar than the 20 cdtaron aw middotcc-Mdatlbullana btcluM peetlcidel wre not quantlta

CDM Federal ProgrclffiS Corpgtration

MI lamakian February 19 1988 Page rour

A calculation check wa1 perfoflllltd on tetrachloroethene and bit(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate in ~le AH829 and the reported value1 of 35 UCJ1k9 and 20000 UCJikg retpectively ware reproducible Mall Spectral bulltchlng quality va1 checked and found to be acceptable

I have enclond that data package 10 you can mark it a1 appropriate

Sincerely

CDM rderal Program~ Corporation

KGl- l Sh-M_ Karen L stone lnYironental lcientilt

lnclowre1

cca Deborah Szaro

_

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

Ma Banukian February 19 1988 Page rive

CASE 8129

TMLE I NXXJIIIIDmMI~ StiiWY

SMPLEmiddot PBST~ A1 A12 A1AH828 A1

A1 A12 A1M829 A1

A1 A12 A1 A1AH830

A1 A12 A1J A1Mill

A accept

A1 accept but bullJbull calibration violatiana

A2 accept but fora bil(2-ethylhexyl)phthalatea R lt 1800Ugkg gt J gt 3600 A DL bull 1800 uJ

A accept but bulluJbull all detection liaita

CDM FedelCll Programs CorpolCltion

Ma Bat1111lkian February 19 1988 Page Six

Joi)IS

NI829-BM-RICa Significant bulltdx effect11 baMline riM fraa 1ean 22-36 TIC1 po1itively identified 2(3H)furanone dihydro lhould be

rejected due to blank contlldnation

M83G-BNP-IUCI Significant trix effect11 baMline riM froa 1can 22-36 Wtak tpectra for indeno(l23-cd)pyrene benao(ghi) shyperylene Milling 1pectra for dibenao(ah)anthracene

TIC I Po1itively identified 2(3H)furanone dUl)dro lhould be rejected due to blank contlldnation

M831-~-IUCI Po11ible trix effect11 alight baMline riM froa lean 27-30

TIC I Politively identified 2(3H)furanone dihydro and 1-brco-4-chlorobennne lhould be rejected due to blank contlldnation

1. barcode 569056
2. barcodetext SDMS Doc ID 569056

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

Ms Barmakian February 19 1988 Page 1Wo

MSMSD data were reviewed and all VOP banlneutral and acid extractable apike ~were within contractual liaita Percent recoveriea were outaide QC liaita for aany of the peaticide a pike ~middot However becaun no peaticidea were detected in the AJ111lea it il reca~~~~~nded to accept all MSMSD data

~lea M829 and M830 were the field duplicate HJII)lea 1be RPDI for fluoranthene (37) indeno(123-cd)pyrene (43) and benao(ghi)perylene (39) excttded the 32 criterion for banntutral extractablebull in aoil Due to the heterogeneity of aoil aamplea concluaiona drawn froa field duplicate Cltlllpariaona are of lillited value and therefore no r~ndation ia llade

rive bullthod blanka (two volatile one aeaivolatile two peaticide) were included in thil data package 1be following ~rhea what waa found in thoH blankl (ugkg) I

Laboratory blanka

8709234-081 bi1(2-ethylhtxyl)phthalate 180J

Taking into conaideration then blank levell a prelillinary reccndation for thia data Itt i11

bia(2-ethylhtxyl)phthalatel a lt 1800 uglkg gt J gt 3600A DL bull 1800 uJ

rield and trip blank data wre not included in thia data Mt

Detection llllit reaulta wre prennt be laboratory did not reportconcentration 1lta for volatllea or Maivolatllea and therefore they could not be evaluated be detection lillita for peaticldea wre reported ln llicr09raM It ia riOIYJndtd that all detection lillita be reported in uglkg

lni till and continuing calibration data vere revlewd and are -rbed below One volatile IJICC (chlorcthlne) wa outaide QC criteria in the lnitlal calibration In addition vinyl chloride (CCC) wa outaide QC criteria in the contiruing calibration tbttr their contract the laboratory il required to eorrect the prcblbull before rrforlling ~e enalyaea but tty did not leQuM the laboratory d1 not detect theM CCIIpCIUftda in the NIIPlebull it il reccbullbullndtd to ~ the data but to rport the detection llllita for the CCIIIpOUnda u Ht tea (uJ)

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

MI Barmakian February 19 1988 Page lbree

lbe following ummarize1 initial and continuing calibration analytea out1ide QC requirementas

~ (~ all datar J(+) R(ND))

ehloraaethane vinyl chloride ehloroethane acetone 2-butanone 2-hexanone 4-Mthyl-2-pentanone

Aa1ociated aamp1els

1M ( J all data) z sri(2-ehloroethyl )ether ilopheroneaeenaphthylene24-dlnitrotoluene ctiethylphthalate 4-n1troan111ne 46-dinitro-o-ereiOl btnloie acid 4-ctlloroaniline lr -cUehlorobenaictine

AaiOCiated Allplelz

IIIT ( no pUeide1 quantitated - accept all detection liaita) leta-IIIC 0 IIIC Heptachlor epoxide tnaoeulfan I Dieldrin 44-DDT

MIOeiatad ~ebullbull

91087

1015187

M828-M8ll

1029187

bull bull

bull

bullbull

tlcide data wre nviewd and f~ to be bull difference (D) bttwen calibration factors clarint the WI evaluatad on the confilMtion col~ an4 middotthe tDI o wre 91Ntar than the 20 cdtaron aw middotcc-Mdatlbullana btcluM peetlcidel wre not quantlta

CDM Federal ProgrclffiS Corpgtration

MI lamakian February 19 1988 Page rour

A calculation check wa1 perfoflllltd on tetrachloroethene and bit(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate in ~le AH829 and the reported value1 of 35 UCJ1k9 and 20000 UCJikg retpectively ware reproducible Mall Spectral bulltchlng quality va1 checked and found to be acceptable

I have enclond that data package 10 you can mark it a1 appropriate

Sincerely

CDM rderal Program~ Corporation

KGl- l Sh-M_ Karen L stone lnYironental lcientilt

lnclowre1

cca Deborah Szaro

_

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

Ma Banukian February 19 1988 Page rive

CASE 8129

TMLE I NXXJIIIIDmMI~ StiiWY

SMPLEmiddot PBST~ A1 A12 A1AH828 A1

A1 A12 A1M829 A1

A1 A12 A1 A1AH830

A1 A12 A1J A1Mill

A accept

A1 accept but bullJbull calibration violatiana

A2 accept but fora bil(2-ethylhexyl)phthalatea R lt 1800Ugkg gt J gt 3600 A DL bull 1800 uJ

A accept but bulluJbull all detection liaita

CDM FedelCll Programs CorpolCltion

Ma Bat1111lkian February 19 1988 Page Six

Joi)IS

NI829-BM-RICa Significant bulltdx effect11 baMline riM fraa 1ean 22-36 TIC1 po1itively identified 2(3H)furanone dihydro lhould be

rejected due to blank contlldnation

M83G-BNP-IUCI Significant trix effect11 baMline riM froa 1can 22-36 Wtak tpectra for indeno(l23-cd)pyrene benao(ghi) shyperylene Milling 1pectra for dibenao(ah)anthracene

TIC I Po1itively identified 2(3H)furanone dUl)dro lhould be rejected due to blank contlldnation

M831-~-IUCI Po11ible trix effect11 alight baMline riM froa lean 27-30

TIC I Politively identified 2(3H)furanone dihydro and 1-brco-4-chlorobennne lhould be rejected due to blank contlldnation

1. barcode 569056
2. barcodetext SDMS Doc ID 569056

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

MI Barmakian February 19 1988 Page lbree

lbe following ummarize1 initial and continuing calibration analytea out1ide QC requirementas

~ (~ all datar J(+) R(ND))

ehloraaethane vinyl chloride ehloroethane acetone 2-butanone 2-hexanone 4-Mthyl-2-pentanone

Aa1ociated aamp1els

1M ( J all data) z sri(2-ehloroethyl )ether ilopheroneaeenaphthylene24-dlnitrotoluene ctiethylphthalate 4-n1troan111ne 46-dinitro-o-ereiOl btnloie acid 4-ctlloroaniline lr -cUehlorobenaictine

AaiOCiated Allplelz

IIIT ( no pUeide1 quantitated - accept all detection liaita) leta-IIIC 0 IIIC Heptachlor epoxide tnaoeulfan I Dieldrin 44-DDT

MIOeiatad ~ebullbull

91087

1015187

M828-M8ll

1029187

bull bull

bull

bullbull

tlcide data wre nviewd and f~ to be bull difference (D) bttwen calibration factors clarint the WI evaluatad on the confilMtion col~ an4 middotthe tDI o wre 91Ntar than the 20 cdtaron aw middotcc-Mdatlbullana btcluM peetlcidel wre not quantlta

CDM Federal ProgrclffiS Corpgtration

MI lamakian February 19 1988 Page rour

A calculation check wa1 perfoflllltd on tetrachloroethene and bit(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate in ~le AH829 and the reported value1 of 35 UCJ1k9 and 20000 UCJikg retpectively ware reproducible Mall Spectral bulltchlng quality va1 checked and found to be acceptable

I have enclond that data package 10 you can mark it a1 appropriate

Sincerely

CDM rderal Program~ Corporation

KGl- l Sh-M_ Karen L stone lnYironental lcientilt

lnclowre1

cca Deborah Szaro

_

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

Ma Banukian February 19 1988 Page rive

CASE 8129

TMLE I NXXJIIIIDmMI~ StiiWY

SMPLEmiddot PBST~ A1 A12 A1AH828 A1

A1 A12 A1M829 A1

A1 A12 A1 A1AH830

A1 A12 A1J A1Mill

A accept

A1 accept but bullJbull calibration violatiana

A2 accept but fora bil(2-ethylhexyl)phthalatea R lt 1800Ugkg gt J gt 3600 A DL bull 1800 uJ

A accept but bulluJbull all detection liaita

CDM FedelCll Programs CorpolCltion

Ma Bat1111lkian February 19 1988 Page Six

Joi)IS

NI829-BM-RICa Significant bulltdx effect11 baMline riM fraa 1ean 22-36 TIC1 po1itively identified 2(3H)furanone dihydro lhould be

rejected due to blank contlldnation

M83G-BNP-IUCI Significant trix effect11 baMline riM froa 1can 22-36 Wtak tpectra for indeno(l23-cd)pyrene benao(ghi) shyperylene Milling 1pectra for dibenao(ah)anthracene

TIC I Po1itively identified 2(3H)furanone dUl)dro lhould be rejected due to blank contlldnation

M831-~-IUCI Po11ible trix effect11 alight baMline riM froa lean 27-30

TIC I Politively identified 2(3H)furanone dihydro and 1-brco-4-chlorobennne lhould be rejected due to blank contlldnation

1. barcode 569056
2. barcodetext SDMS Doc ID 569056

CDM Federal ProgrclffiS Corpgtration

MI lamakian February 19 1988 Page rour

A calculation check wa1 perfoflllltd on tetrachloroethene and bit(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate in ~le AH829 and the reported value1 of 35 UCJ1k9 and 20000 UCJikg retpectively ware reproducible Mall Spectral bulltchlng quality va1 checked and found to be acceptable

I have enclond that data package 10 you can mark it a1 appropriate

Sincerely

CDM rderal Program~ Corporation

KGl- l Sh-M_ Karen L stone lnYironental lcientilt

lnclowre1

cca Deborah Szaro

_

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

Ma Banukian February 19 1988 Page rive

CASE 8129

TMLE I NXXJIIIIDmMI~ StiiWY

SMPLEmiddot PBST~ A1 A12 A1AH828 A1

A1 A12 A1M829 A1

A1 A12 A1 A1AH830

A1 A12 A1J A1Mill

A accept

A1 accept but bullJbull calibration violatiana

A2 accept but fora bil(2-ethylhexyl)phthalatea R lt 1800Ugkg gt J gt 3600 A DL bull 1800 uJ

A accept but bulluJbull all detection liaita

CDM FedelCll Programs CorpolCltion

Ma Bat1111lkian February 19 1988 Page Six

Joi)IS

NI829-BM-RICa Significant bulltdx effect11 baMline riM fraa 1ean 22-36 TIC1 po1itively identified 2(3H)furanone dihydro lhould be

rejected due to blank contlldnation

M83G-BNP-IUCI Significant trix effect11 baMline riM froa 1can 22-36 Wtak tpectra for indeno(l23-cd)pyrene benao(ghi) shyperylene Milling 1pectra for dibenao(ah)anthracene

TIC I Po1itively identified 2(3H)furanone dUl)dro lhould be rejected due to blank contlldnation

M831-~-IUCI Po11ible trix effect11 alight baMline riM froa lean 27-30

TIC I Politively identified 2(3H)furanone dihydro and 1-brco-4-chlorobennne lhould be rejected due to blank contlldnation

1. barcode 569056
2. barcodetext SDMS Doc ID 569056

_

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

Ma Banukian February 19 1988 Page rive

CASE 8129

TMLE I NXXJIIIIDmMI~ StiiWY

SMPLEmiddot PBST~ A1 A12 A1AH828 A1

A1 A12 A1M829 A1

A1 A12 A1 A1AH830

A1 A12 A1J A1Mill

A accept

A1 accept but bullJbull calibration violatiana

A2 accept but fora bil(2-ethylhexyl)phthalatea R lt 1800Ugkg gt J gt 3600 A DL bull 1800 uJ

A accept but bulluJbull all detection liaita

CDM FedelCll Programs CorpolCltion

Ma Bat1111lkian February 19 1988 Page Six

Joi)IS

NI829-BM-RICa Significant bulltdx effect11 baMline riM fraa 1ean 22-36 TIC1 po1itively identified 2(3H)furanone dihydro lhould be

rejected due to blank contlldnation

M83G-BNP-IUCI Significant trix effect11 baMline riM froa 1can 22-36 Wtak tpectra for indeno(l23-cd)pyrene benao(ghi) shyperylene Milling 1pectra for dibenao(ah)anthracene

TIC I Po1itively identified 2(3H)furanone dUl)dro lhould be rejected due to blank contlldnation

M831-~-IUCI Po11ible trix effect11 alight baMline riM froa lean 27-30

TIC I Politively identified 2(3H)furanone dihydro and 1-brco-4-chlorobennne lhould be rejected due to blank contlldnation

1. barcode 569056
2. barcodetext SDMS Doc ID 569056

CDM FedelCll Programs CorpolCltion

Ma Bat1111lkian February 19 1988 Page Six

Joi)IS

NI829-BM-RICa Significant bulltdx effect11 baMline riM fraa 1ean 22-36 TIC1 po1itively identified 2(3H)furanone dihydro lhould be

rejected due to blank contlldnation

M83G-BNP-IUCI Significant trix effect11 baMline riM froa 1can 22-36 Wtak tpectra for indeno(l23-cd)pyrene benao(ghi) shyperylene Milling 1pectra for dibenao(ah)anthracene

TIC I Po1itively identified 2(3H)furanone dUl)dro lhould be rejected due to blank contlldnation

M831-~-IUCI Po11ible trix effect11 alight baMline riM froa lean 27-30

TIC I Politively identified 2(3H)furanone dihydro and 1-brco-4-chlorobennne lhould be rejected due to blank contlldnation

1. barcode 569056
2. barcodetext SDMS Doc ID 569056