ION-EXCHANGE PROCESSES BETWEEN IMMISCIBLE MOLTEN …

22
USNRDL-TR-847 I8 April 1965 ION-EXCHANGE PROCESSES BETWEEN IMMISCIBLE MOLTEN PHASES by R. C. Scheidt E. C. Freiling U.S. NAVAL RADIOLOGICAL DEFENSE LABORATORY S A M F R A N C I S C O C A L I F O R N I A 94135

Transcript of ION-EXCHANGE PROCESSES BETWEEN IMMISCIBLE MOLTEN …

USNRDL-TR-847 I8 April 1965

ION-EXCHANGE PROCESSES BETWEEN IMMISCIBLE MOLTEN PHASES

by R . C. Sche id t E. C. Freiling

U.S. N A V A L R A D I O L O G I C A L D E F E N S E L A B O R A T O R Y

S A M F R A N C I S C O C A L I F O R N I A 9 4 1 3 5

PHYSICAL C-STRY BRANCH E. C. Freiling, Head

CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY DIVISION R. Cole, Head

ADMINISTRATNE INFORMATION

The work requested is part of a project sponsored by the Atomic Energy Commission under Contract No. AT-(49-2)-=67.

We are grateful to Messrs. R o b e r t Cochran and Robert Brawnlee for experimental assist- ance,

D E AVAILABILITY NOTICE

Qualified requesters may obtain copies of this report from DE.

.............*...... .........*~...*........*...............*....................~*........*...*.**...................., . 0 .

Edward R. Tompkins Associate Scientific Director

D.C. CGmpbelI, C A P T USN C o m m a n d i n g O f f i c e r and Director

DISCLAIMER

This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency Thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document.

ABSTRACT

T O test the hypothesis t h a t cat ion d i s t r ibu t ion i n (alkali oxide)- (boron oxide) - ( a lka l i hal ide) systems occurs by ion-exchange processes, some d e f i n i t i v e experiments were devised and carr ied out. ments consisted of equi l ibra t ing Na22-labelled sodium borate with K C 1 a t 83OOc. Higher concentrations of K+ than C1' i n the borate phase and Na' than BO2 i n t h e s a l t phase established the operation of cation- exchange processes i n the immiscible molten system.

The experi-

i

SUMMAR'Y

If Na22-labelled sodium borate i s equi l ibrated w i t h K C 1 a t 83OoC, it is found t h a t t h e concentration of t h e foreign cat ion always exceeded the concentration of t h e foreign anion i n the immiscible phase being con- sidered, i .e . , i n the oxide phase the concentration of K+ exceeds t h a t of C1' while i n the sal t phase Na' exceeds t h e concentration of Bo:. This observation confirms the existence of ion-exchange processes pre- viously postulated t o occur i n molten a l k a l i hal ide-alkal i borate systems.

ii

BACKGROUND

2 Stglhane’ and Dunicz and Scheidt have studied the misc ib i l i t y of molten a l k a l i borates with molten a l k a l i hal ides (except f luor ides) i n t h e region 800-9800~. (boron oxide) show misc ib i l i ty gaps i n t h i s temperature range a t low alkali-oxide contents. s t ruc tures f o r a l k a l i borate glasses which s t rongly resemble those of synthet ic , organic ion exchangers. Specif ical ly , they a r e visualized as mobile cations, a t t r ac t ed by coulombic forces t o 1ocal.izations of negative charge, the l a t t e r being part of a th ree dimensional network of covalently bonded atoms.

The ternary systems ( a l k a l i oxide) - ( a l k a l i hal ide) - Biscoe and Warren,3 among others, have postulated

4 Adam and Quan and Krogh-Moe’ have fu r the r assumed t h a t such s t ruc- t u re s p e r s i s t when the glasses a re molten. Therefore, current models of l iquid borate s t ruc ture suggest that the immiscible phases of a l k a l i borate a re e s sen t i a l ly molten ion-exchangers i n contact with molten e lec t ro ly tes . This in te rpre ta t ion i s supported by the d i s t r ibu t ion co- e f f i c i e n t s of a l k a l i , a lkal ine-ear th , and rare-ear th cations reported by Rowell.6 Rowell’s r e s u l t s show that, i n ce r t a in regions o f a l k a l i oxide content, d i s t r ibu t ion coef f ic ien ts resemble those obtained between Dmex-50 and d i l u t e HC1, not only i n order of s e l e c t i v i t y but a l s o i n magnitude.

This report first describes an ion-exchange mechanism f o r t h e d i s - t r i b u t i o n of cations i n these systems. It then presents the r a t iona le f o r t e s t i n g the mechanism, and f i n a l l y , presents da ta t o support the proposed in te rpre ta t ion .

PROPOSED MECHANISM

Figure 1 shows a typ ica l mi sc ib i l i t y diagram f o r the systems i n question, plot ted i n terms of components of t he type B20 , MB02 and MX (M=alkali metal, X=C1, Br or I). The important fea ture af t h i s diagram

1

(K, Na) BO,

i

NRDL 14-65

.

( K , Na) Cl

Fig. 1 Compositions Tested for Ion-Exchange Processes (830'~)

2

f o r t he subject at hand i s that t h e misc ib i l i t y gap fa l l s i n t o two regions and this i s indicated by both the behavior of t he t i e l i n e s and the shape of t he curve.

For brevity, w e w i l l c a l l t h e region of law alkali metaborate con- t e n t region A. This region extends over borate compositions ranging from pure boric oxide t o approximately M O*5B203. I n t h i s region there is appreciable a l k a l i hal ide so lub i l i t y fi .e., e l ec t ro ly t e penetration) i n t h e oxide (exchanger) phase. alkali hal ide corner show t h a t t h e so lub i l i t y of t h e oxide (exchanger) i n t h e hal ide phase (co-phase) i s s l igh t . of t he soluble species i n the sodium chloride system t o be B2O3 and the s o l u b i l i t y t o be 0.04 mole $.6

The convergence of the t i e l i n e s a t the

R o w e l 1 determined the formula

Region B extends from the M20*5B20

by the sharply increasing borate so lub i l i t y . found NaBO2 dissolving a t compositions more basic than M ~ O O ~ B ~ O

M20 3B2O3 6

composition t o the p l a i t point. It shows increasing e l ec t ro ly t e penetra 2 ion but i s characterized b e t t e r

polyborate species, such a s MB305, a t compositions more basic t 2 an

I n t h e NaCl system Rowel1 and

I n view of these f a c t s the most reasonable mechanism by which ion- exchange processes can proceed between the oxide and ha l ide phases i n region A appears t o be t h a t shown i n Fig. 2. Here t h e convention i s used t o indicate an oxygen atom shared between two boron atoms, only one of which i s indicated. The f igure i s otherwise self-explanatory. I n region B t h e f igure should be modified t o show the presence of (M+) - Bo2(B203); ion pa i rs and s imi la r s t ruc tures which a r i s e from the break- down of t h e borate s t ruc ture and d issoc ia te i n the hal ide phase.

RATIONAG3

The foregoing considerations ind ica te ce r t a in differences from the familiar acpeous ion exchange system: there is no neut ra l phase corres- ponding t o water (o r organic solvent); there a re no conditions of negl i - g ib l e e l ec t ro ly t e penetration and under most conditions penetration is high; a t a l l compositions, there i s a sensible exchanger so lub i l i t y , and a t some compositions t h i s s o l u b i l i t y i s appreciable. I n view of these differences, it i s w o r t b h i l e c la r i fy ing what w e mean by "ion exchange" i n general before proceeding.

3

NRDL 371-64

OXIDE PHASE SALT PHASE

M+ X'

Rapid exchange equili brium

. , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 1 controlled

t l M+ X- ion pairs dissolved in oxide phase equilibrium

-+ Slow, diffusion

Fig. 2 Systems a t Low Alkali Oxide Concentrations.

Postulated Behavior of (Boron Oxide) - ( A l k a l i Oxide) - ( A l k a l i Halide)

4

There i s no de f in i t i on which has y e t received universal acceptance by workers i n t h e f i e ld . appear t o represent what workers i n t h e f i e l d mean i n t h e i r correspond- ence :

However, the following set of def in i t ions

Ion-exchange mechanism: A mechanism which produces a heterogeneous, ion ic metathesis.

Ion-exchange process: A chemical process which proceeds by an ion-exchange mechanism.

Ion-exchanger process: A chemical process carr ied out by an ion exchanger(e.g., ca ta lys i s , ion exclusion, s i t e sharing, e tc . , including ion-exchange processes).

This de f in i t i on of ion-exchange mechanism is operational and appl i - cable t o any heterogeneous system.

Returning now t o Fig. 2, suppose a so lu te hal ide NX i s introduced i n t o the sa l t phase. and the MX dissolved

This c& d i s t r i b u t e i t s e l f between t h e sal t phase i n t h e oxide phase according t o t h e e q i l i b r i u m .

where a ind ica tes thermodynamic a c t i v i t y and subscripts 0 and S ind ica te the oxxde and salt phases respectively. occurring, t h e concentration C&+ of equal t o or less than - the concentration of X'. However, i f ion ex-

If t h i s were the onlyprocess i n the oxide phase would be c l ea r ly

change occurs there i s % he addi t iona l equilibrium

This ecpilibrium permits addi t iona l N+ t o be concentrated i n t h e oxide phase and the poss ib i l i t y that t h e oxide phase concentration of N+ w i l l exceed tha t of X'. Therefore, a su f f i c i en t , but not necessary, condition f o r proving the occurrence of an ion-exchange process i s tha t

(cN+)o> (cx-)o

The poss ib i l i t y that exchange occur i n the sal t phase subsequent t o d isso lu t ion of oxide as MBo2 leads t o t h e same r e su l t s . phase consis ts of pure NX, s imi la r considerations lead t o t h e a l t e rna t ive condition

If t h e hal ide

5

The experiments described here t e s t t he presence of these r e l a t ion - ships a t various points i n regions A and B by equi l ibra t ing molten phases of composition NagO.x B 0 ' w i t h molten K C 1 a t 8 3 0 " ~ . 2 3

ExmmNTAL

Equil ibrat ion charges were prepared from reagent grade chemicals. Sodium borate glasses of known composition were label led with known quant i t ies of sodim-22, t h e pur i ty of which had been ver i f ied by gamma- ray spectrometry. Labelled glasses were dehydrated with a Meker burner. Before equi l ibrat ion, they were fu r the r dried f o r 15 minutes a t WOoC and then equi l ibrated with potassium chloride a t 830 f 5OC. The overa l l K C 1 composition was 54 mole % i n each case. Ecpilibr&ions were carried out i n graphi te crucibles under a dry argon atmosphere w i t h mechanical s t i r r i n g . Equi l ibrat ions las ted 95 minutes. The crucible was then r e - moved f r o m t h e furnace and cooled rapidly i n a j e t of cold air. Crucibles were sawed open and severa l samples of each phase were removed f o r analy- sis. Samples were analyzed i n t r i p l i c a t e . Alkal i oxide was determined by t i t r a t i o n with 0.1 N hydrochloric acid t o the methyl-red end point. Boron oxide was d e t e d n e d by conversion t o mannitoboric acid and subse- quent t i t r a t i o n with 0.1 N sodium hydroxide t o the phenolphthalein end point. by t h e Volhard method. mercuric n i t r a t e and a mixed indicator (bromophenol blue, diphenyl car- bazone and xylene cyanole FF i n 95 % ethanol) gave more accurate r e su l t s . Sodium was determined radiometrically and potassium was calculated by difference.

Samples of high sglt concentration were analyzed f o r chloride For low sal t concentrations, a method using

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Figure 1 shows the region of the misc ib i l i t y diagram where each r u n was carr ied out.

6

Figure 3 shows t h e values of C&+ and C i n t h e oxide phase for each run. ( regardless of associated cat ion) t h a t would be present i n t h e oxide phase were no chlor ide present. This i s a convenient measure of posi- t i o n i n t h e misc ib i l i t y diagram f o r comparing r e s u l t s between systems containing d i f f e r e n t a l k a l i halides. The higher value of C&+ i n every case c l ea r ly established the operation of cation-exchange processes.

The abscissa i n t h i s f igure i s @?-mole f r ac t ion of BO:

The r e s u l t s of Fig. 4 confirm the above conclusion. This f i g u r e presents t h e complementary data f o r sa+ and 5 0 : i n t h e s a l t phase. Again t h e concentration of t h e fore ign ca t ion exceeds t h a t of t he foreign anion f o r every case.

Final ly , it is of i n t e r e s t t o compare these da t a with Rowell's r e s u l t s f o r t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n of t r a c e r Rb+ and Cs+ i n t he system Nag0 - N a C l - B20 i n region A, t h e 2 arger ca t ion always showed t h e g rea t e r preference f o r the oxide phase. t he l a rge r ca t ion showed t h e g rea t e r preference for t h e s a l t phase. Figure 5 shows t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n da ta i n t h e present case p lo t ted as

a t 830Oc. Rowell found that, for Na+, Rb' and Cs+

This s i t u a t i o n was exact ly reversed i n region B: here

f o r Na' and k?. appears t o be coincidental.

The occurrence of t h i s reversal a t t h e region boundary

The f i g u r e shows t h e same qualitative behavior as t h a t found by T h a t is, R o w e l l i n s p i t e of t h e increased loading of the exchanger.

t h e l a rge r ca t ion had t h e g rea t e r a f f i n i t y f o r t h e oxide phase i n region A, but t h e l e s s e r a f f i n i t y i n region B. The occurrence of t h e reversal a t t h e region boundary appears t o be coincidental .

7

NRDL 14-65

I I

P - 10 L POTASSIUM E

I- /

E

+ Fig. 3 Concentrations of K and C1- Ions i n t h e Oxide Phase (830'~)

8

NRDL 14-65 IO

PLAIT

a

a

f

k-

m

0.1 a LL I- z

z 0

r BORATE ION CONCENTRATION :.”’

0.01 d

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9

(cBo-) /[(c,o-90+ (CS l o ] 2 0 2 3

4- Fig. 4 Concentrations of Na and BO; Ions in the Salt Phase ( 8 3 0 ’ ~ )

9

1 .o

n Y

0.1

0.01

,

NRDL

I I I I I I I I I -

-

-Region A d b - Region B -d 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 .o

(CBOz-)O ’ [‘CBOF)O -k (cB$s)O]

+ + Fig. 5 Distribution of K and Na Ions Between Immiscible Phases in the System (K, Na) B02-B203-(K, Na) C1 at 830’~.

10

0 1.

2.

B. L. Stalhane, Z Electrochem., 35; 486 (1929); - 36, 404 (1930).

B. L. Dunicz and R. C . Scheidt, "Solute Distribution i n the Na20- B203-NaCl System. 111. Immiscibility Diagrams of Molten Sodium Halide-Sodium Polyborates . " USNRDL-TR-752, 22 May 1964 . J. Biscoe and B. E. Warren, J. Am. Ceram. SOC., 21, 287 (1938). 3.

4. C. E. Adams and J. T. b a n , "Vapor Pressures i n the Liquid System Rb20- +O uS&L-m-566, 6 June 1962, t o be submitted t o J. Phys. Chem.

J. Krogh-Moe, Phys. -IC and Chem. - of Glasses, 3, 101 (1962).

Derived Thermodynamic Data and a Structural Interpretation."

5.

6. M. Rowell, "Solute Distribution i n the Na20-B20 -NaC1 System. I. Alkali Metals." USNRDL-TR-~~~, 9 October 1962; $1, Alkaline Earths and Rare Earths, USNRDL-TR-760, 12 June 1964, t o be submitted t o J. Inorg. Chem.

11

r

0 J

F

4 V

Chemistry

INITIAL DISTRIBUTION

Copies

1 2 1 1 3 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1

2 1 20

3

NAVY

Chief, Bureau of Ships (Codes 320-364A) Chief, Bureau of Ships (Code 210L) Director, Naval Research Laboratory Chief of NavaUResearch (Code 422) CO, Office of Naval Research, FPO, New York Supt . , Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey Commander, Mare Island Naval Snipyard (Library)

-

ARMY - Chief of Research and Development (Atomic Office) CG, A r n ~ y Materiel Command (AMCRD-DE-NE) Commandant, Chemical Center and School Commander, Nuclear Defense Laboratory CO, Engineer Research and Development Laboratory Director, USACDS Nucleas Group

AIR FORCE

Director, USAF Project RAND CG, A i r Force Special Weapons Laboratory, Kirtland AFB Director, A i r University Library, Maxwell AFB Commander, A i r Force Cambridge Research Laboratories (CRT)

UTHER DOD ACTIVITIES

Director, Defense Atomic Support Agency (Library) Commander, FC/DASA, Sandia Base (FCW) Defense Documentation Center

AEC ACTIVITIES

Argonne Nat ional Laboratory

3 Atomic Energy Commission, Washington 3 1 3 Brookhaven National Laboratory 2 1 1 1 Sandia Corporation, Albuquerque 1 Sandia Corporation, Livermore 2 2 15 Division of Technical Extension, Oak Ridge

Atomic Energy Commission, Division of Research Atomic Energy of Canada, Limited

Los Alamos Scient if i c Laboratory NASA, Sc ien t i f i c & Technical Information F a c i l i t y National Bureau of Standards (Library)

University of Cal i fornia Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, Livermore University of Cal i forn ia Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, Berkeley

USNRDL

35 Technic a1 Inf ormat ion Division

DISTRIBUTION DATE: 25 June 1965

14

UNCLASSIFIED Security Classification

DOCUMENTCONTROLDATA-RAD (Security claseificstfan of title, body o f abstracf and tndextne annotatton muet be entered when the overall report i s claeeified)

1 O R I G I N A T I N G A C T I V I T Y (Corporate author) 2 a R E P O R T S E C U R I T Y C L A S S I F I C A T I O N

U. S. Naval Radiological Defense Laboratory UNC LASS D I E D San Francisco, Cal i forn ia 94135 2 6 G R O U P

None 3 R E P O R T T I T L E

ION-EXCHANGE PROCESSES BEWEEN IMMISCIBLE MOLTEN PHASES

L. D E S C R I P T I V E N O T E S (Type of report and inclusive detee)

j . AUTHOR(S1 (Lest name, ffraf name, inltiel)

Scheidt, Ronald C. F re i l ing , Edward C.

i. R E P 0 R T D A T E 7 a . T O T A L N O . O F P A G E S 7 6 . N O . O F R E F S

25 June 1965 17 6 le. C O N T R A C T O R G R A N T N O . 9 8 . O R I G I N A T O R ' S R E P O R T NUMSER(S)

USNRDL-TR-847 Contract No. AT-(49-2)-1167 b. P R O J E C T N O .

C . 9 b . O T H E R R P O R T NO(S) (Any ofhernumbere that may be aeef#ned thfe report?

d.

0. A V A IL A B I L I T Y / L I M I T A T I O N N O T I C E S

Qual i f ied requesters may obtain copies of t h i s repor t from DDC.

1. S U P P L E M E N T A R Y N O T E S 12. SPONSORING M I L I T A R Y A C T I V I T Y

Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D. C. 20545

3. A B S T R A C T

To tes t t h e hypothesis t h a t ca t ion d i s t r ibu t ion i n ( a l k a l i oxide)-(boron oxide)-(alkal i halide) systems occurs by ion-exchange processes, some def in i t ive experiments were devised and c k r i e d out. b ra t ing Na22-labelled sodium borate with K C 1 a t 830%. of K+ than C1' i n the borate phase and Na' than BG i n t h e sal t phase es tab l i shed t h e operation of cation-exchange processes i n t h e immiscible molten system.

The experiments consis ted of equ i l i - Higher concentrations

UNC LASS D I E D Security Classification

__ -D LINK C

R O L E W T

Fused sal t Molten salt ion exchange Immiscibility diagram phase equilibrium Ion distribution

INSTRUCTIONS 1. ORIGINATING ACTIVITY: Enter the name and address of the contractor, subcontractor, grantee, Department of De- fense activity or other organization (corporate author) issuing the report.

2a. REPORT SECUFdTY CLASSIFICATION Enter the o v e r ail security classification of the report. Indicate wtiether “Restricted Data” is included. Marking is to b e in accord ance with appropriate security regulations. 26. GROUP: Automatic downgrading is specified in DoD Di- rective 5200.10 and Armed Forces Industrial Manual. Enter the group number. Also, when applicable, show that optional markings have been used for Group 3 and Group 4 ’as author- ized. 3. REPORT TITLE. Enter the complete report title in all ccpital letters. T i t les i n all ca ses should b e unclassified. If a rncanindul title cannot be selected without c l a s s i f i ce ’ tion, sliow title classification in all capitals in parenthesis immediately following the title. 4. DESCRIPTIVE NOTES: If appropriate, enter the4ype of report, e.g., interim, progress, summary, annual, or final. ,

Give the inclusive da tes when a specific reporting period is covered. 5. AUTflOR(S): Enter the name(s) of author(s) as shown on or in the report. Enter l a s t name, first name, middle initial. If xditary, show rank and branch of service. The name of the prinzipal aathor is an absolute minimum requirement ’

6. REPORT D A T 2 Enter the date of the report a s day, month, year, or month, year. If more than one,date appears on the report, u se date of publication 78. TOTAL NUMBER O F PAGES The total page count should follow normal pagination procedures. Le., enter the number of pages containing information. 76. NUMBER O F REFERENCES: Enter the total number of references cited in the report. Sa. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBER If appropriate, enter the applicable number of the contract or grant under which the report was written 86, 8c, & 8d. PROJECT NUMBER Enter the appropriate military department identification, ,such a s project number, subproject number, system numbers, task number, etc 58. ORIGINATOR’S REPORT NUMBER(S): Enter the offi- cial report number by which .the document will b e identified and controlled by the originating activity. be unique to this report. 96. OTHER REPORT NUMBER(S): If the report has been assigned any other report numbers (either b y the originator or b y the sponsor), also enter th i s number(s). 10. AVALLABILITY/LIMITATION~NOTICES Enter any lim- .itations on further dissemination of the report, other than those

.

This number must

imposed by security classification, using standard statements such as:

(1)

(2)

(3)

“Qualified requesters may obtain copies of th i s report from DDC“ “Foreign announcement and dissemination of this report by DDC is not authorized I’

“U. S. Government agencies may obtain copies of this report directly from DDC. Other qualified DDC users shall request through

’I

(4) “U. S. military agencies may obtain copies of this report directly from DDC Other qualified users shall request through

I 1

(5) “All distribution of this report is controlled Qual- ified DDC users shall request through

I’

If the report has beep furnished to the Office of Technical Services, Department of Commerce, for sale to the public, indi- ca t e this fact and enter the price, i f known. 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES. Use for additional explana- tory notes. 12. SPONSORING MILITARY ACTIVITY Enter the name of the departmental project office or laboratory sponsoring (pay- ing for) the research and development Include address 13. ABSTRACT: Enter an abstract giving a brief and factual summary of the document indicative of the report, even though i t may a l so appear elsewhere in the body of the technical re- port. If additional space is required, a continuation shee t shall be attached.

It is highly desirable that the abstract of classified reports be unclassified. Each paragraph of the abstract shall end with an indication of the military security classification of the in- formation in the paragraph, represented a s (TS), (s). (C) , o r (U).

There is no limitation on the length of the abstract. How- ever, the suggested length is from 150 to 225 words.

14. KEY WORDS: Key words are technically meaningful terms or short phrases that characterize a report and may be used as index entries for cataloging the report. Key words must be selected so that no security classification is required. Identi- fiers, such a s equipment model designation, trade name, militaq project code name, geographic location, may be used a s key words but will be followed by an indication of technical con- text. The assignment of links, d e s , and weights is optional.

)B.IYNRM64 1473 (BACK) UNCLASSIFIED Security Classification