InvestmentAnalysis ALC RM AR edits 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 1 June 18, 2018 INTRODUCTION...

104
Draft 2019 TIP June 18, 2018 APPENDIX A 3 2019 TIP Investment Analysis

Transcript of InvestmentAnalysis ALC RM AR edits 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 1 June 18, 2018 INTRODUCTION...

  • Draft 2019 TIP June 18, 2018

    APPENDIX A 3

    2 0 1 9 T I P I n v e s t m e n t A n a l y s i s

  • 2019 TIP Investment Analysis

    AFOCUSONLOWINCOMEANDMINORITYPOPULATIONS,SENIORS,ANDPERSONSWITHDISABILITIES

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 1 June 18, 2018

    INTRODUCTION The2019TIPInvestmentAnalysisisanassessmentofTIPinvestmentsthroughanequitylens,specificallyfocusedontheBayAreasdisadvantagedpopulations.Thepurposeoftheanalysisistounderstandiflowincomeandminoritypopulations,seniors,andpersonswithdisabilitiesaresharingequitablyintheregionsneartermtransportationinvestments.2019TIPTheBayAreas2019TIPcoversthefouryearperiodofFY201819throughFY202122andincludesmorethan500transportationprojectswith$13billionincommittedfundingduringthefouryearperiod.ProjectsintheTIPTheTIPincludesalltransportationprojectsthatarefederallyfunded,requireafederalaction,orareconsideredregionallysignificantforairqualityconformitypurposes.ThemajorityofprojectsintheTIParefederallyfunded,althoughsomelocalorstatefundedprojectsarealsoincluded,particularlythosethatarelargeinscaleorimpacttravelpatternsoverarelativelylargegeographicarea,suchasanewlaneonastatehighway.InreviewingTIPinvestmentsasawhole,itisimportanttokeepinmindthatmosttransportationprojectsarelocal,inbothscaleandfunding,andtheseprojectsaretypicallynotreflectedintheTIP.Theseprojectsincludepavementpreservation,transitoperationsandmaintenance,planningefforts,bicycle/pedestrianimprovements,andminorintersectionimprovements.AllprojectsincludedintheTIPmustbeconsistentwiththeregionslongrangeplan,PlanBayArea2040(thePlan).Assuch,theTIPrepresentsafouryearsnapshotthatisasmallpartofthe24yearsofthePlan.InadditiontothetotalinvestmentscapturedintheTIPversusthePlan,thereisanimportantdifferencebetweenthesetwodocumentsthatcomplicatesanysidebysidecomparison.WhilethePlanincludestheuniverseofrevenuesreasonablyexpectedtobeavailable(federal,state,local,andprivatefunds)toimplementplannedtransportationprojects,program,andstrategies,theTIPismuchmorefocusedonprojectswithfederalfundingorthataffectairqualityconformity.ThismeansthattheTIPismoreheavilyweightedtowardlargecapitalprojects,suchastransitandhighwayexpansions,thataremorelikelytorequirefederalfundsoraction.Thevastmajorityoffundsthatgotooperate,maintain,andmanagetheregionsexistingtransportationsystem,atoppriorityofthelongrangeplan,arenottypicallycapturedinaTIPastheytendtobelocallyfunded.SeeFigure1,onthefollowingpage,foranillustrationofthisdistinction.

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 2 June 18, 2018

    Figure1.TIPandPlanInvestmentsbyMode/Type

    $303billion

    24years$13.2billion

    4yearsThenarrowerfocusoftheTIPalsomeansonlyafractionoftotalregionaltransportationexpendituresarecapturedinanygivenyear.Onaverage,oneyearofinvestmentsinthe2019TIPaccountsforonlyaquarterofannualexpendituresintheregionallongrangeplan.AnotherfeatureoftheTIPthatdistinguishesitfromtheregionallongrangeplanisthatittendstobeamoredynamicdocumentmeaningthatitisrevisedfrequentlytoreflectchangingfundingandprojectchanges,andongoingfundingefforts.Forcontext,the2017TIPwasamendedormodifiedmorethan30timesinthetwoyearsfollowingitsfederalapproval.EquityandEnvironmentalJusticeConsiderationsAsthefederallydesignatedMetropolitanPlanningOrganization(MPO)fortheBayArea,MTCisrequiredtoensurethattheregionstransportationplanningprocessescomplywithapplicableequityandenvironmentaljusticerequirements.Thelegal,regulatory,andpolicyframeworkforaddressingthoseissuesisdescribedinAppendixAandincludes: TitleVIoftheCivilRightsAct:statesthatnopersonshallbesubjectto

    discriminationbasedonhisorherrace,colorornationaloriginunderanyfederallyfundedprogram.

    FederalGuidanceonEnvironmentalJustice:requirementthatfederalprogramsandfundsdonotresultindisproportionatelyhighandadverseimpactsonminorityandlowincomepopulations.

    MTCsEnvironmentalJusticePrinciples:adoptedprinciplesthataffirmMTCsongoingcommitmentsto:

    Operate+Maintain72%

    Modernize16%

    Expand10%

    DebtService+CostContingency

    2%

    PlanBayArea2040InvestmentsExpendituresbyInvestmentStrategy

    Operate+Maintain34%

    Modernize19%

    Expand47%

    DebtService+CostContingency

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 3 June 18, 2018

    Createanopenandtransparentpublicparticipationprocessthatempowersdisadvantagedcommunitiestoparticipateindecisionmakingthataffectsthem,and

    Collectaccurateandcurrentdataessentialtodefiningandunderstandingthepresenceandextentofinequities,ifany,intransportationfundingbasedonraceandincome.

    MTCsatisfiesitsrequirementsforequityandenvironmentaljusticeprimarilythroughPlanBayAreasEquityAnalysis,MTCsPublicParticipationPlan,andMTCsbroaderTitleVIprogram.TofurtherbuilduponMTCscommitmenttoaddressequityconcerns,theTIPInvestmentAnalysisprovidesthepublicwithanadditionalopportunitytoassesstheregionstransportationinvestments.

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 4 June 18, 2018

    BAY AREA COMMUNITY CONTEXT DemographicProfileAnimportantfirststepoftheinvestmentanalysisistounderstandthedemographiccontextandtravelpatternsfortheBayArea.Race/EthnicityTheBayAreaisoneofthemostdiverseregionsinthecountry,with60percentofthepopulationselfidentifyingasmembersofaracialand/orethnicminority.Inthismajorityminorityregion,aquarterofthepopulationidentifiesasAsian(25%),followedcloselybyHispanicorLatino(24%),andthenBlackorAfricanAmerican(6%).Otherracialminorities,includingthoseidentifyingastwoormoreraces,accountfortheremaining5%ofthepopulation.

    TABLE1.PopulationDistributionbyRace/Ethnicity Population

    (inmillions) %Minority 4.6 60%Asian 2.0 25%HispanicorLatino 1.8 24%BlackorAfricanAmerican 0.4 6%Otherminority 0.4 5%

    NonMinority 3.0 40%Total 7.6 100%

    Notes:TabulationpreparedbyMTCbasedondatafrom2016AmericanCommunitySurvey,TableC03002.IncomeAlthoughtheBayAreaseconomyhasshownstronggrowthoverthepastfewdecades,regionallevelsofpovertypersist.Nearlyninepercentofthepopulationlivesbelowthefederalpovertylevel($24,300ayearforafamilyoffour).Another12percentoftheregionshouseholdsaretechnicallyabovethefederalpovertylinebutstillqualifyaslowincomeforthepurposesofthisanalysis,definedashouseholdswithincomesthatfallbelow$50,000(approximately200percentofthefederalpovertylineforafamilyoffour).Forreference,the2016medianincomeforafamilyoffourrangesfromjustover$69,000inSolanoCountytomorethan$101,000inSantaClaraCounty.

    TABLE2.PopulationDistributionbyHouseholdIncome Population

    (inmillions) %LowIncome 1.6 21%$150,000 2.7 36%

    Total 7.5 100%

    Notes:TabulationpreparedbyMTCbasedondatafrom2016AmericanCommunitySurveyPublicUseMicrodataSamples.Incomeiscalculatedin2016denominateddollars.Notethattheuniverseispersonsinhouseholdsandexcludespersonslivingingroupquarters.

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 5 June 18, 2018

    SeniorsandPersonswithDisabilitiesMorethan14%oftheBayAreaspopulationisaged65orolder.PersonsreportingdisabilitiesacrosssixcategoriesdefinedbytheCensusBureautotalnearly10%oftheregionspopulation.

    TABLE3.SeniorsandPersonswithDisabilities

    Population(inmillions) %

    Seniors 1.1 14%PersonswithDisabilities 0.8 10%

    Notes:TabulationpreparedbyMTCbasedondatafrom2016AmericanCommunitySurveyTablesC18101andB01001.Notethattheuniverseisciviliannoninstitutionalizedpopulationcountedindisability.

    TravelPatternsCommutetripsbyBayArearesidentsareoverwhelminglymadebymotorvehicle(76%)followedbytransit(12%),nonmotorizedtrips(5%),telecommute(6%),andothermodes(1%).

    TABLE4.ShareofCommuteTripsbyModebyPopulation Low

    Income Minority SeniorsTotal

    PopulationRoadway(Motorized) 73% 78% 73% 76%Roadway(Nonmotorized) 8% 4% 4% 5%Transit 11% 12% 8% 12%Telecommute 6% 4% 14% 6%Other 2% 1% 1% 1%Total 100% 100% 100% 100%

    Notes:TabulationpreparedbyMTCbasedondatafrom2016AmericanCommunitySurveyPublicUseMicrodataSamples.Incomeiscalculatedin2016denominateddollars.Notethattheuniverseispersonsinhouseholdsandexcludespersonslivingingroupquarters.Theshareofalltrips(includingbothcommuteandnoncommutetrips)madebytargetpopulationgroupsisprovidedinTable4below.Whiletherearedifferencesinthetravelpatternsoflowincome,minorityandseniorpopulations,thevastmajorityofalltripsarecategorizedasroadwaytrips,whichincludeshighwayandroadwaytravelaswellastripsmadebywalkingorbiking.

    TABLE5.ShareofCommuteandNonCommuteTripsbyModebyPopulation Low

    Income Minority SeniorsTotal

    PopulationRoadway(Motorized) 74% 80% 82% 80%Roadway(Nonmotorized) 18% 14% 14% 15%Transit 7% 6% 4% 5%Total 100% 100% 100% 100%

    Notes:Tabulationbasedon2012CaliforniaHouseholdTravelSurvey.Tabulationdoesnotincludeshareoftripsmadebypersonswithdisabilitiesduetosamplesizelimitations.

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 6 June 18, 2018

    METHODOLOGY The2019TIPinvestmentanalysisisbuiltonthreecomponentsthatworktogethertoinformhowlowincomeandminoritycommunities,seniors,andpersonswithdisabilitiesmaybeaffectedbytheproposedinvestmentsinthe2019TIP.

    Themethodologiesusedineachanalysisaredescribedinmoredetailbelow.AppendixBincludesdefinitionsanddatasourcesusedinthisanalysis.PopulationUseBasedAnalysisThisportionoftheanalysiscomparestheestimatedpercentofinvestmentsincludedintheTIPthatbenefitlowincomeandminoritypopulations,aswellasseniors,tothepercentofthesepopulationsrelativeusageofthetransportationsystem,forbothroadwaysandtransit.Theanalysismeasurestransitandmotorvehicletripsusingthe20122013CaliforniaHouseholdTravelSurvey.

    1. Forthisanalysis,investmentsintheTIPareseparatedintotwomodes:transitandlocalstreetsandroads/highway(referredtoasroadway).Forsimplicity,pedestrianandbicycleprojectsareassignedtolocalstreetsandroadsandnotevaluatedasaseparatemodeoftravelorinvestmenttype.Forreference,AppendixCincludesmapsforeachcountywithprojectsshownwiththeirroadwayortransitcategorization.

    2. Toanalyzewhatshareofeachmode(transitandroadway)lowincome,minority,andseniorpopulationsutilize,thefollowingdefinitionsareusedtoidentifydisadvantagedpopulations: LowIncomeHouseholds:Lowincomehouseholdsweredefinedashouseholds

    earning$50,000orless.Thisisroughlyequivalentto200percentofthefederalpovertylevelforafamilyoffour.

    MinorityHouseholds:Forthisanalysis,minorityhouseholdsweredefinedusingU.S.CensusBureaudefinitions.RacialandethnicminoritiesexaminedinthisanalysisareHispanic,blackorAfricanAmerican,Asian,andotherortwoormoreraces.

    Seniors:Seniorsaredefinedaspersonsaged65andover.

    PopulationUseBasedAnalysisPercentofinvestmentsthatwouldlikelybeusedbylowincomeandminoritypopulations,andseniors

    DisparateImpactAnalysisPercapitaandperridertransitinvestmentslikelybenefitingracialorethnicminorities

    TransportationEquityMeasuresAnalysisMapsandsummarydataonprojectsthatsupportPlanBayArea2040stransportationfocusedequitymeasures

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 7 June 18, 2018

    3. Theassignmentofinvestmentsbyusageisthenperformedbymultiplyingthepercentofuseofthemodebytheinvestmentinthatparticularmode.Thisanalysisisconductedatthecountylevelforhighwaysandroadwaysandatthetransitoperatorlevelfortransit.Forthemultimodal,aggregateanalysis,tripdatafromthehouseholdtravelsurveyisused.Asanillustrativeexample,lowincomepopulationsmake32%ofAlamedaCountyroadwaytrips.Fora$50millionstatehighwayprojectinthatcounty,32%or$16million,wouldbeassignedasafinancialbenefittolowincomepopulationsandtheremaining68%,or$34million,totheremainingpopulation.Asimilarapproachisfollowedfortransitinvestmentsbyoperator.Asimilaranalysisisconductedusingroadwayvehiclemilestraveled(VMT)andtransitorigindestinationdistance.Fortheindepthanalysis,transitusagedataisderivedfromthemostrecenttransitsurveydataavailableforeachoperatorthroughMTCsongoingTransitPassengerDemographicSurvey.Forindepthroadwayusage,VMTdataisusedfromthehouseholdtravelsurvey.

    4. Theinvestmentsbymode(fromcountyortransitoperatordata)aresummedforlowincome,minority,andseniorpopulationsbasedoneachgroupsusageshareofeachmode.Thepercentofusageofthesystembythetargetandotherpopulationsisthencomparedtothepercentofinvestmentfortripssupportingthatpopulation.

    DisparateImpactAnalysisThisportionoftheanalysiscompares2019TIPinvestmentspercapitaforracialorethnicminoritypopulationstopercapitainvestmentsidentifiedfornonminoritypopulations,toinvestigatewhetherdisadvantagedpersonsintheregionarereceivinganequitableshareofthebenefitsfromTIPinvestments.DuetothesimilaritiesintheanalysisrequiredbytheFederalTransitAdministration(FTA)forthelongrangetransportationplan,thisportionoftheanalysisisalsoreferredtoastheTitleVIanalysis.ThedisparateimpactanalysisisnotarequiredcomponentoftheTIP,andisprovidedforinformationalpurposesonly.Thisportionoftheanalysisfocusesonfederalandstatefundedprojectsonly.SomeoftheStateandFederalfundsourcesincludedareFTA5307,FTA5309,FTA5311,FTA5337funds,STP/CMAQ,Proposition1B,andSenateBill1(SB1)funds.Inaddition,allracialorethnicminoritygroups(Asian,BlackorAfricanAmerican,HispanicorLatinoandotherminorities)areevaluatedcollectivelyincomparisontotheinvestmentspercapitafornonminoritypopulations.Thedisparateimpactanalysisincorporatesthequantitativeresultsproducedbythepopulation/usebasedanalysisforstateandfederallyfundedprojects.Investmentsarefirstexpressedintermsofinvestmentspercapitaforbothminorityandnonminoritytransitriders(ortotalpopulation)intheregionasfollows:

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 8 June 18, 2018

    Minoritybenefitpercapita= Totaltransitinvestmentsallocatedtominorityriders Totalregionalminoritytransitridership(orpopulation) Nonminoritybenefitpercapita=Totaltransitinvestmentsallocatedtononminorityriders Totalregionalnonminoritytransitridership(orpopulation)Next,theminorityandnonminoritypercapitabenefitresultsarecompared,expressingtheminoritybenefitpercapitaasapercentageofthenonminoritybenefitpercapita:Result(%)=Minoritybenefitpercapita Nonminoritybenefitpercapita

    AlthoughFTAdoesnotprovidespecificguidanceorstandardbenchmarksforMPOstouseinthemetropolitanplanningprocesstodeterminewhetheranygivenresultforalongrangeplanrepresentsadisparateimpact,ageneralpracticeistousethepercentageresulttodeterminewhetheranydifferencesbetweenbenefitsforminorityornonminoritypopulationsmaybeconsideredstatisticallysignificant.Ifadisparateimpactinthelongrangeplanisfoundtobestatisticallysignificant,considerationmustthenbegiventowhetherthereisasubstantiallegitimatejustificationforthepolicythatresultedinthedisparateimpacts,andiftherearealternativesthatcouldbeemployedthatwouldhavealessdiscriminatoryimpact.1Asstatedearlier,thedisparateimpactanalysisisnotafederalrequirementfortheTIP,andisincludedinthe2019TIPInvestmentAnalysisforinformationalpurposes.TransportationEquityMeasuresAnalysisThethirdcomponentoftheanalysishighlightsprojectsandinvestmentsthatarelikelytosupportourregionalperformancetargetsinfivetransportationrelatedequitymeasuresfromPlanBayArea2040.PlanBayArea2040GoalArea Goal# PerformanceTargetHealthyandSafeCommunities

    3 Reducedadversehealthimpactsassociatedwithairquality,roadsafety,andphysicalinactivityby10%

    EconomicVitality 8 Increaseby20%theshareofjobsaccessiblewithin30minutesbyautoorwithin45minutesbytransitincongestedconditions

    TransportationSystemEffectiveness

    12 Reducevehicleoperatingandmaintenancecostsduetopavementconditionsby100%

    13 Reduceperridertransitdelayduetoagedinfrastructureby100%EquitableAccess 5 Decreasetheshareoflowerincomeresidentshouseholdincome

    consumedbytransportationandhousingby10%HealthyandSafeCommunitiesProjectsthatareexpectedtocontributetowardsreachingourregionalgoalsforhealthyandsafecommunitiesincludeprojectsthatimproveroadsafety,projectsthatincreasephysicalactivity,andprojectsthatimproveairquality.Theseprojectsareidentifiedby: 1 FTA Circular 4702.1B, page VI-2.

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 9 June 18, 2018

    Safety:Projectsidentifiedbytheprojectsponsorsashavingaprimarypurpose

    ofaddressingsafety,orasanticipatedtohaveasignificantimpactonreducingfatalitiesandseriousinjuriesforallusers.

    PhysicalActivity:Projectsidentifiedbyprojectsponsorsasbeingfocusedprimarilyonbicycleorpedestrians(greaterthan50%oftheprojectsinvestmentsupportsbicyclistsand/orpedestrians),andthetotalinvestmentsincludedintheTIPthatsupportbicycleorpedestrianmoderegardlessoftheprojectsprimarypurpose.

    AirQuality:ProjectsfundedwithfederalCongestionMitigationAirQuality

    ImprovementProgram(CMAQ),stateCaliforniaAirResourcesBoard(CARB),regionalTransportationforCleanAir(TFCA)grants,orinMTCsClimateInitiativesProgram.

    Thenumberandinvestmentleveloftheprojectssupportingthehealthyandsafecommunitiesgoalareaaresummarizedattheregionalandcountylevel.Safetyandactivetransportationprojectsthathavephysicallocations(ex.:acompletestreetsproject,oraninterchangeimprovement)arealsomappedovertheregionsCommunitiesofConcern(COCs).EconomicVitalityTransportationprojectsthatcanbeexpectedtoincreaseaccessibilitytotheshareofjobsbycarandtransitareprojectsthatreducetrafficcongestionorimprovethereliabilityoftheexistingtransportationsystem.Theseprojectsareidentifiedby:

    RoadCongestion/Reliability:Roadprojectsidentifiedbytheprojectsponsorsashavingaprimarypurposeofaddressingcongestionorsystemreliability,orprojectsanticipatedashavingasignificantimpactoncongestionreductionorimprovedsystemreliability.

    TransitService/Capacity:Transitprojectsidentifiedbytheprojectsponsorsashavingaprimarypurposeofaddressingcongestionorsystemreliability,orprojectsanticipatedashavingasignificantimpactoncongestionreductionorimprovedsystemreliability.

    Thenumberandinvestmentlevelofprojectssupportingtheeconomicvitalitygoalareaaresummarizedattheregionalandcountylevel.Additionally,projectsidentifiedasimprovingcongestionorsystemreliabilitythathavephysicallocations(ex.:anewbusrapidtransitproject,oranewHOVorexpresslane)arealsomappedovertheregionsCommunitiesofConcern(COCs).

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 10 June 18, 2018

    TransportationSystemEffectivenessThetransportationsystemeffectivenessgoalareaencompassestwoperformancemeasures:pavementconditionandtransitstateofgoodrepair.Theseprojectsareidentifiedby:

    PavementCondition:Projectsthatincludeapavementrehabilitationorpreservationcomponent.

    TransitStateofGoodRepair:Projectsthatrehabilitateorreplaceexistingtransitassets.

    Thenumberandinvestmentlevelofprojectssupportingimprovedpavementconditionsaresummarizedattheregionallevelandcountylevel.Additionally,pavementprojectsarealsomappedovertheregionsCommunitiesofConcern(COCs).Transitstateofgoodrepairinvestmentsaresummarizedattheregionalandtransitoperatorlevel.Astransitassetprojectstendtobesystemwide,ratherthantiedtoastaticlocation,theyarenotincludedintheTransportationSystemEffectivenessmaps.Transitprojectsassociatedwithneworexpandedserviceinspecificlocations,suchasanewlightrailline,arerepresentedintheEconomicVitalitymaps.EquitableAccessTheEquitableAccesscomponentiscalculatedattheprogramlevelforthe2019TIP.ReplicatingPlanBayArea2040smethodology,dataisprovidedfromtheregionaltransportationmodeltoreportthetransportationcostsforlowincomehouseholdsin2022(endofthe2019TIPperiod)ascomparedtothetransportationcostsforthegeneralpopulation.Inthetravelmodel,andthusforpurposesofthiscalculation,lowincomehouseholdsaredefinedasthoseearninglessthan$60,000peryearinyear2000dollars,roughlyreflectingthelowertwoquartilesoftheincomespectrum.GiventhefocusoftheTIPontransportationinvestments,thehousingcostsportionoftheEquitableAccessmeasureisexcludedfromthisanalysis.LimitationsAsaregionalanalysis,themethodsusedintheTIPinvestmentanalysishaveseverallimitations.Themostsignificantlimitationisthattheanalysisdoesnotdirectlyassesstheresultingbenefitandburdenofspecificprojectsorprograms,suchastraveltimesavingsorimprovedaccessibilitytojobsorotherdestinations.Otherlimitationsare:

    TIPisasnapshotintime:ItisalsoimportanttoreemphasizethattheTIPdoesnotreflectthefullpictureoftransportationinvestmentsintheBayAreaoverthelongterm.Asdiscussedintheintroduction,theTIPonlyincludesfouryearsofneartermfundprogramming,comparedtothe20+yearsforecastinPlanBayArea2040.Also,fundingshownintheTIPisincludedintheyearthatprojectphasesbeginorareobligatedanddoesnotreflecttheactualflowoffundingandexpenditureswithinthesephases.Whilerehabilitationprogramswilltypicallyhavetheirfundingspread

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 11 June 18, 2018

    acrossmanyyears,largecapitalprojectstendtohavetheirfundinglumpedintoasingleyearintheTIP,evenifthefundswillactuallybeexpendedoveranumberofyears,someofwhichmaybeoutsidethe4yearperiodoftheTIP.

    Notesonassumptions:Inaddition,theanalysisassumesthatmodechoiceand

    systemusageremainsconstantovertime.Systemexpansion,suchasanewtransitlineorhighway,andchangingconditions,suchasimprovementstoreliabilityandtravelcosts,tendtoinfluencetravelbehaviorovertime.However,thisanalysisassumesthattheusagederivedintherecenttravelsurveyandtransitpassengersurveysremainstaticovertime.Theclassificationofinvestmentsintoeitherroadwayortransitinvestmentsalsopresentssomelimitations.Forexample,classifyingapavementrehabilitationprojectasstrictlyroadwaydoesnotaccountforthebenefittotheregionstransitvehiclesthatsharethestreetwithprivateautomobiles.

    Mappinglimitations:Mappingprojectsprovidesavisualrepresentationofthe

    locationofprojectsinrelationtoCOCs.However,projectmappingalsopresentscertainlimitations.First,notallsignificantregionalinvestmentsaremappable.Forexample,asubstantialshareoftotalfundingintheTIPisdedicatedtotransitoperatorsforongoingmaintenanceoftheirentiresystem,whichcannotberepresentedasasimplepointorlineonamapinrelationtoaspecificcommunity.Second,displayinginvestmentsonamapdoesnottranslateintoadirectbenefitorburdenforthesurroundingcommunities.Giventheselimitations,themappinganalysisprovidesaqualitative,ratherthanquantitative,assessmentofthespatialdistributionofmappableprojectsincludedintheTIP.

    Fundingandprojecttypes:Giventhedocumentsfederalfocus,theinvestmentsreflectedintheTIPrepresentonlyaboutaquarterofalltransportationinvestmentsintheBayAreaatanygiventime.Asaresult,theinvestmentanalysisdoesnotcapturetheequityimplicationsofmanylocallyfundedprojects.Localprojectstendtobesmaller,inbothgeographyandscope,butcollectively,theseprojectsareexpectedtohaveasignificantimpactontravelbehaviorsandexperiencesthroughouttheregion.

    Demographicdata:Whilethelatestavailabledemographicdatawasusedinthe

    investmentanalysis,somedatasetshavebeenupdatedmorerecentlythanothers.Theinformationfromthehouseholdtravelsurveyismorethan5yearsold,withdatacollectedfromhouseholdsbetween2012and2013.Thetransitpassengersurveydataismorerecent.However,theexactyearofdatacollectionvaries,asMTCconductsthesurveysbyoperatoronarollingbasis.Giventhepacewithwhichtravelpatternsandbehaviorshavechangedinrecentyears,theyearinwhichdataiscollectedisexpectedtoinfluencetheresultsoftheanalysis.

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 12 June 18, 2018

    The2019TIPinvestmentanalysisincludesananalysisofinvestmentsbenefitingseniors.Unfortunately,asimilaranalysisforpersonswithdisabilitiesisnotincludedduetosamplesizelimitationsofthetravelsurvey,anddataunavailabilityfromthetransitpassengerdemographicsurvey.However,aqualitativediscussionofregionaltransportationinvestmentsthatbenefitseniorsandpersonswithdisabilitiesisincludedinthefollowingsection.

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 13 June 18, 2018

    ANALYSIS RESULTS & DISCUSSION PopulationUseBasedResultsThepopulationusebasedanalysisisdividedintothreefocusareas:income,race/ethnicity,andseniors.Additionalinformationisalsoprovidedattheendofthissectiononregionaleffortsandinitiativestosupportandbetterunderstandthetransportationneedsofresidentswithtransportationrelateddisabilities.InvestmentsbyIncomeBayArearesidentslivinginlowincomehouseholds,earninglessthan$50,000peryear,accountfornearlyathirdofalltrips(27%)intheregion.Inthe2019TIP,32%ormorethan$4billionisdirectedtoprojectssupportingtripsmadebyresidentsfromlowincomehouseholds.Theshareoftheseinvestmentssupportinglowincometripsexceedstheshareoftripsmadebypersonsfromlowincomehouseholdsbyapproximately5%.SeeTable6andFigures2and3foradditionaldetail.TABLE6.2019TIPInvestmentsandTripsbyIncome

    2019TIPInvestments(in$billions)

    %ofInvestment

    %ofTrips

    LowIncome $4.3 32% 27%$150,000 $2.7 20% 23%

    Total $13.2 100% 100%FIGURE2.2019TIPInvestmentsandTripsbyIncomeCategory

    16% 16% 15% 15% 18% 20%11% 17% 16% 14% 20% 23%0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%

    $150K

    %ofInvestment%ofTrips

    Source:Draft2019TIPandCaliforniaHouseholdTravelSurvey

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 14 June 18, 2018

    FIGURE3.2019TIPInvestmentsandLowIncomeTrips

    Similarly,theshareofinvestmentsinprojectsthatsupporttravelmadebylowincomepopulations(24%)slightlyexceedstheirusageshareofthetransportationsystemintermsofshareofthetotaldistancetraveled(22%)vehiclemilestraveled(VMT)forautotripsandorigindestinationdistancefortransittrips.SeeTable7andFigure4. TABLE7.2019TIPInvestmentsandTravelDistancebyIncome

    2019TIPInvestments

    (in$billions)%of

    Investment

    %ofTotalTravel

    DistanceLowIncome $3.1 24% 22%$150,000 $3.2 24% 25%

    Total $13.2 100% 100%FIGURE4.2019TIPInvestmentsandTravelDistancebyIncomeCategory

    32% 27%

    0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%

    ShareofInvestmentforTripsmadebyLowIncomePopulation

    ShareofTripsbyLowIncomePopulation

    Source:Draft2019TIPandCaliforniaHouseholdTravelSurvey

    10%14% 14% 15% 22% 24%

    7%15% 16% 15% 22% 25%0%

    10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%

    $150K

    %ofInvestment

    %ofTravelDistance

    Source:Draft2019TIPandCaliforniaHouseholdTravelSurvey

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 15 June 18, 2018

    Theanalysisindicatesthattheshareofinvestmentsinlocalroad,statehighwayandtollbridgesystemsthatbenefitdriverslivinginlowincomehouseholds(21%)isverysimilartotheshareoftotalVMTbydriverslivinginlowincomehouseholds(22%).SeeTable8andFigure5.TABLE8.2019TIPRoadwayInvestmentsandTravelDistancebyIncomeIncludesLocalStreetsandRoads,StateHighway,PublicLands/Trails,Port/FreightRailandTollBridge

    2019TIPRoadwayInvestments(in$billions)

    %ofInvestment

    %ofTotalTravel

    Distance*LowIncome $1.3 21% 22%$150,000 $1.7 27% 26%

    Total $6.3 100% 100%*Totaltraveldistanceisvehiclemilestraveled(VMT)forallnontransittripsasderivedfromtheCaliforniaHouseholdTravelSurvey.FIGURE5.2019TIPRoadwayInvestmentsandTravelDistancebyIncomeIncludesLocalStreetsandRoads,StateHighway,PublicLands/Trails,Port/FreightRailandTollBridge

    Theshareoftransitinvestmentsinthe2019TIPforpassengerslivinginlowincomehouseholds(40%)fallsshortoftheshareoftransittripsbypassengerslivinginlowincomehouseholds(47%).TABLE9.2019TIPTransitInvestmentsandTransitTripsbyIncome

    2019TIPTransitInvestments

    (in$billions)%ofTransitInvestment

    %ofPassengerTransitTrips

    LowIncome $2.8 40% 47%NotLowIncome $4.2 60% 53%Total $7.0 100% 100%

    6% 15% 16% 15% 21%27%7% 15% 16% 15% 22%

    26%

    0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%

    $150K

    %ofRoadwayInvestments%ofVehicleMilesTraveled(VMT)

    Source:Draft2019TIPandCaliforniaHouseholdTravelSurvey

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 16 June 18, 2018

    FIGURE6.2019TIPTransitInvestmentsandPassengerTripsbyIncome

    InvestmentsbyRace/EthnicityMinorityhouseholdsmakeup60%oftheregionspopulationandaccountfor52%ofalltrips.TheshareoftransportationinvestmentsintheBayAreathatsupportminoritypopulationtrips(57%)isgreaterthantheshareoftripstakenbythesepopulations(52%).TABLE10.2019TIPInvestmentsandTripsbyRace/Ethnicity

    2019TIPInvestmentsbyTrips(in$billions)

    %ofInvestment %ofTrips

    NonMinority $5.7 43% 48%Minority $7.5 57% 52%Total $13.2 100% 100%

    FIGURE7.2019TIPInvestmentsandTripsbyRace/Ethnicity

    Theminorityhouseholdpopulationsaccountforapproximatelyhalf(50%)ofalltravel

    40% 47%

    0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%

    ShareofTransitInvestmentforLowIncomePassengers

    ShareofTransitTripsbyLowIncomePassengers

    Sources:Draft2019TIPandTransitPassengerDemographicSurvey(MTC)andBARTCustomerSatisfactionSurvey

    43%57%48% 52%

    0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%

    NonMinority Minority

    %ofInvestmentbyTrips%ofTotalTrips

    Source:Draft2019TIPandCaliforniaHouseholdTravelSurvey

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 17 June 18, 2018

    distance,asmeasuredbyVMTofroadwaytripsandorigindestinationdistancefortransittrips.Theshareofinvestmentssupportingminoritytravelbydistance(52%)isslightlymorethantheshareoftraveldistancetraversedbytheminoritypopulations(50%).TABLE11.2019TIPInvestmentsandTravelDistancebyRace/Ethnicity

    2019TIPInvestmentsbyTravelDistance

    (in$billions)%of

    Investment%ofTravel

    DistanceNonMinority $6.4 48% 50%Minority $6.8 52% 50%Total $13.2 100% 100%

    FIGURE8.2019TIPInvestmentsandTravelDistancebyRace/Ethnicity

    Personsfromminorityhouseholdsaccountforhalfofallroadwaytraveldistance,asmeasuredbyVMT.Theshareofinvestmentssupportingminorityroadwaytravelbydistance(50%)isroughlyequivalenttotheoverallshareofVMTtraveledbyminoritypopulations(49%).TABLE12.2019TIPRoadwayInvestmentsandTravelDistance(VMT)byRace/EthnicityIncludesLocalStreetsandRoads,StateHighway,PublicLands/Trails,Port/FreightRailandTollBridge

    2019TIPInvestmentsbyVMT(in$billions)

    %ofInvestment %ofVMT

    NonMinority $3.1 50% 51%Minority $3.1 50% 49%Total $6.3 100% 100%

    48% 52%50% 50%

    0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%

    NonMinority Minority

    %InvestmentbyTravelDistance%ofTravelDistance

    Source:Draft2019TIPandCaliforniaHouseholdTravelSurvey

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 18 June 18, 2018

    FIGURE9.2019TIPRoadwayInvestmentsandTravelDistance(VMT)byRace/EthnicityIncludesLocalStreetsandRoads,StateHighway,PublicLands/Trails,Port/FreightRailandTollBridge

    Nearlytwothirds(63%)oftransittripsintheBayAreaaretakenbyresidentsidentifyingasaracialorethnicminority.Theshareofinvestmentsinthe2019TIPthatsupportthesetransittrips(67%)isslightlymorethantheshareoftransittripsmadebyminoritypopulations(63%).TABLE13.2019TIPTransitInvestmentsandTransitTripsbyRace/Ethnicity

    2019TIPInvestmentsbyTransitTrips

    (in$billions)%of

    Investment%ofTransit

    TripsNonMinority $2.3 33% 37%Minority $4.6 67% 63%Total $7.0 100% 100%

    FIGURE10.2019TIPTransitInvestmentsandTransitTripsbyRace/Ethnicity

    50% 50%51% 49%

    0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%

    NonMinority Minority

    %ofInvestmentbyVMT

    %ofVMT

    Source:Draft2019TIPandCaliforniaHouseholdTravelSurvey

    33%

    67%

    37%

    63%

    0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%

    NonMinority Minority

    %ofInvestmentbyTrips%ofPassengerTrips

    Sources:Draft2019TIPandTransitPassengerDemographicSurvey(MTC)andBARTCustomerSatisfactionSurvey

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 19 June 18, 2018

    InvestmentsbySeniorsSeniors,definedforthisanalysisaspersonsovertheageof65,accountfornearly14%oftheregionspopulation.Theshareoftransportationinvestmentsthatsupporttripstakenbyseniors(10%)isslightlylessthan,butroughlyequivalentto,theirshareoftrips(11%).TABLE14.2019TIPInvestmentsandTripsbySeniors

    2019TIPInvestmentsbyTrips

    (in$billions)%of

    Investment %ofTripsSenior $1.3 10% 11%NonSenior $11.9 90% 89%Total $13.2 100% 100%

    FIGURE11.2019TIPInvestmentsandTripsbySeniors

    Seniorsalsoaccountfor10%ofalltraveldistance,asmeasuredbyVMTofroadwaytripsandorigin/destinationdistancefortransittrips.Thisisroughlyequivalenttotheirshareoftheinvestments(8%)supportingdistancetravelledbyseniorpopulations.TABLE15.2019TIPInvestmentsandTravelDistancebySeniors

    2019TIPInvestmentsbyTravelDistance

    (in$billions)%of

    Investment%ofTravel

    DistanceSenior $1.0 8% 10%NonSenior $12.2 92% 90%Total $13.2 100% 100%

    10%

    90%

    11%

    89%

    0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%

    Seniors NonSeniors

    %ofInvestmentbyTrips%ofTotalTrips

    Source:2019TIPandCaliforniaHouseholdTravelSurvey

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 20 June 18, 2018

    FIGURE12.2019TIPInvestmentsandTravelDistancebySeniors

    Forroadwaytravel,seniorsaccountfor10%ofallVMTandbenefitfromanequivalentshareofinvestments.TABLE16.2019TIPRoadwayInvestmentsandTravelDistance(VMT)bySeniorsIncludesLocalStreetsandRoads,StateHighway,PublicLands/Trails,Port/FreightRailandTollBridge

    2019TIPInvestmentsbyVMT

    (in$billions)%of

    Investment %ofVMTSenior $0.6 10% 10%NonSenior $5.6 90% 90%Total $6.3 100% 100%

    FIGURE13.2019TIPRoadwayInvestmentsandTravelDistance(VMT)bySeniorsIncludesLocalStreetsandRoads,StateHighway,PublicLands/Trails,Port/FreightRailandTollBridge

    Giventhelimitationsofthedataavailable,adetailedlookatinvestmentsbytransittriplengthbypassengerageisnotincludedinthepopulationusebasedanalysis.

    8%

    92%

    10%

    90%

    0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%

    Senior NonSenior

    %InvestmentbyTravelDistance%ofTravelDistance

    Source:Draft2019TIPandCaliforniaHouseholdTravelSurvey

    10%

    90%

    10%

    90%

    0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%

    Senior NonSenior

    %ofInvestmentbyVMT%ofVMT

    Source:2019TIPandCaliforniaHouseholdTravelSurvey

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 21 June 18, 2018

    SupplementalInformationPersonswithTransportationRelatedDisabilitiesLimitationsinthedataavailablemakeitdifficulttoquantifytransportationsystemusageofpersonswithdisabilitiestothedegreenecessaryforthepopulationusebasedanalysis.However,transportationinvestmentsbenefitingthesepopulationsarebeingmadethroughouttheregion.Belowisanoverviewofregionalinvestmentsandplanninginitiativesthatsupporttransportationbypersonswithdisabilities.AlistoftransitprojectscompliantwiththeAmericanswithDisabilitiesAct(ADA)isincludedAppendixA49.

    CommunityBasedTransportationPlanning(CBTP)ProvidesplanningfundsfordevelopingprojectrecommendationsineachoftheregionsCommunitiesofConcern(COCs).PersonswithdisabilitiesareoneofeightfactorsthatareusedtodetermineCOCdesignations.Todate,fortyoneCBTPsat$60,000eachhavebeencompletedforthesecommunities.AnewroundoffundingforupdatedCBTPsisexpectedinthefallof2018.

    LifelineTransportationProgramProvidesfundstoaddressmobilityneedsoflow

    incomeresidents,includingseniorsandindividualswithdisabilities.FundingisusedtosupportprojectsfromCBTPs.Historically,$20millionhasbeenprovidedannually.

    FTASection5310EnhancedMobilityofSeniors&IndividualswithDisabilities

    Providescapitalandoperatinggrantstoprivatenonprofitandpublicagenciestoimprovemobilityforseniorsandindividualswithdisabilitiesbyremovingbarrierstoandexpandingservices.Inthelastroundoffunding,$13.2millioninawardsweremadeintheregionslargeurbanizedareas.Theregionssmallurbanizedareasreceived$1.4millioninawards.

    TransitCapitalPrioritiesProvidesanoptionalADAsetasideof10%oftheFTA

    Section5307largeurbanizedareaapportionment.Operatorsmayusethisfundingtodefraytheoperatingcostsoftheirparatransitsystems.Annually,thisamountstoapproximately$20million.

    StateTransitAssistanceHistorically,aportionofSTAPopulationBasedfundsweresetasideforoperatorstouseinordertodefraytheoperatingcostsoftheirparatransitsystems.WiththeadoptionofMTCResolutionNo.4321inFebruary2018,70%ofallSTAPopulationBasedfundsnowflowtoeachcountyCongestionManagementAgencythroughtheSTACountyBlockGrantand30%isdirectedtotheRegionalProgrammanagedbyMTC.ParatransitoperationsareaneligibleuseoftheCountyBlockGrantprogram.

    MTCsCoordinatedPublicTransitHumanServicesTransportationPlan

    Identifiesthetransportationneedsofindividualswithdisabilities,olderadults,andindividualswithlimitedincome,andidentifiesfundingprioritiesandcoordinationstrategiesformeetingtheseneeds.TheCoordinatedPlanisintendedtomeetthefederalplanningrequirementsaswellastoprovideMTCanditsregionalpartners

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 22 June 18, 2018

    withablueprintforimplementingarangeofstrategiesintendedtopromoteandadvancelocaleffortstoimprovetransportationforpersonswithdisabilities,olderadults,andpersonswithlowincomes.MTCstaffworkswithstakeholdersthroughouttheregiontogatherinputontransportationgaps,aswellassolutionsthataretheneligibleforfederalfundingthroughtheSection5310program.TheCoordinatedPlanwaslastupdatedin2018.

    Caltransrecentlyawardeda$407,000granttoMTCandtheWorldInstituteonDisability(WID)forapilotprojectfocusedonidentifyingandaddressingaccessandmobilityneedsofpeoplewithdisabilitiesintheBayArea.Theprojectwillexplorewaystoexpandinstitutionalcapacityattransitandparatransitserviceproviders,countycongestionmanagementagencies,localjurisdictionsandregionalagenciestobetterunderstandandaddressaccessandmobilityneedsofpeoplewithadisability.MTCwillpartnerwithWIDtoengagecommunitybasedorganizationsandotherstakeholderstodevelopamethodologyandprocessforcollectingdataandupdatingaregionalneedsassessments.Theprojectisanticipatedtostartinfall2018andendbyMarch2020.

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 23 June 18, 2018

    DisparateImpactAnalysisThesecondcomponentoftheinvestmentanalysisincludesacloserlookatfederalandstatetransitinvestments.Thefederalandstatefundingsourcesforpublictransportationaccountforonlyasmallportion(13%)offundinginthe2019TIP,asillustratedbelowinFigure11.FIGURE11.2019TIPTransitInvestmentsfromFederal/StateSourcesasaShareofAllInvestments

    Although40%oftheTIPismadeupofregionalorlocalinvestmentsinpublictransit,itisimportanttonotethatasubstantialshareoftotalfundingdedicatedtotransitoperatorsforongoingoperationsandmaintenancearenotincludedintheTIP.Thisfundingcomesfromstate,regionalandlocalsourcesandmaynotbecapturedintheTIPastheseprojectsandprogramsdonottypicallyrequireafederalaction.Thedisparateimpactanalysisindicatesthattheshareoffederalandstatetransitinvestmentsdistributedtotransitservicesupportingminoritypopulationsvaryascomparedtorespectivesharesofregionaltransitridershipandregionalpopulation.TABLE17.2019TIPFederal/StateTransitInvestmentsbyMinorityStatus

    Federal/StateTransit

    Investments($millions)

    %ofTotalFederal/State

    TransitFunding

    %ofRegionalTransit

    Ridership

    %ofTotalRegional

    PopulationMinority $1,025 62% 63% 60%NonMinority $640 38% 37% 40%Total $1,665 100% 100% 100%

    LocalStreetsandRoads,StateHighwaysandTollBridgeInvestments47%

    Federal/StateTransitInvestments13%

    Regional/LocalTransitInvestments40%

    Source:Draft2019TIP

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 24 June 18, 2018

    Investmentsdistributedonapercapitabasisindicatethatminoritypopulationsintheregionarereceiving$221inbenefitsperperson,morethanthe$210inbenefitsperpersonfornonminoritypopulations(or105%ofthebenefitsreceivedbynonminorityresidents).TABLE18.2019TIPFederal/StateTransitInvestments,DisparateImpactAnalysisbyPopulation

    Federal/StateTransit

    Investments($millions)

    RegionalPopulation

    PerCapitaBenefit

    MinorityperCapitaBenefitas%ofNonMinorityPerCapitaBenefit

    Minority $1,025 4,634,040 $221 105%Nonminority $640 3,049,971 $210 Total $1,665 7,684,011 $217

    Investmentsdistributedonapertransitriderbasisindicatethatminoritypopulationsintheregionreceive$1,007inbenefitsperrider,slightlylessthan$1,089inbenefitspertransitriderfornonminoritypopulations(or92%ofthebenefitsreceivedbynonminorityresidents).TABLE19.2019TIPFederal/StateTransitInvestments,DisparateImpactAnalysisbyBoardings

    Federal/StateTransit

    Investments($millions)

    AverageDailyTransit

    RidershipPerRiderBenefit

    MinorityperRiderBenefitas

    %ofNonMinorityPerRiderBenefit

    Minority $1,025 1,018,086 $1,007 92%Nonminority $640 587,771 $1,089 Total $1,129 1,605,856 $1,037

    TransportationEquityMeasuresHealthyandSafeCommunitiesProjectsthatareexpectedtocontributetowardsreachingourregionalgoalsforhealthyandsafecommunitiesincludeprojectsthatimproveroadsafety,increasephysicalactivity,andimproveairquality.

    RoadSafety:Inthe2019TIP,morethan160projectsandnearly$2billioninfundingaredirectedtoprojectsthatareidentifiedbyprojectsponsorsashavingaprimarypurposeofimprovingroadsafetyorthatareotherwiseanticipatedtosignificantlyreducefatalitiesandseriousinjuries

    Table20.2019TIPRoadSafetyImprovements

    County Projects Investments

    Alameda 40 $368ContraCosta 26 $169Marin 10 $28Napa 10 $36SanFrancisco 10 $65SanMateo 25 $38SantaClara 24 $278Solano 11 $37Sonoma 5 $11Multiple 3 $696 164 $1,726

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 25 June 18, 2018

    duetotrafficcollisions(Table20).Itisimportanttonotethatmanyotherprojectsinthe2019TIPareanticipatedtohaveamoderateorslightpositiveimpactontransportationsafety.However,thisanalysisfocusesonthoseprojectsthathavesafetyimprovementasaprimarypurposeorthatareotherwiseanticipatedtoleadtosignificantreductionsintransportationfatalitiesandseriousinjuriescausedbytrafficcollisions.Someofthelargestsafetyinvestmentsinthe2019TIPinclude: $545millionforvariousStateHighwayOperationandProtection

    Program(SHOPP)CollisionReductionprojects $102millionforvariousSHOPPSafetyImprovementMandatesprojects,

    whichareprimarilyfocusedonensuringcompliancewiththeAmericanswithDisabilitiesAct(ADA)

    $62millionforI680/SR4InterchangeReconstructionPhase3inContraCostaCounty

    $49millionforvariouslocalHighwaySafetyImprovementProgramprojects

    $22millionforMcKeeRdandTullyRdSafetyImprovementsinSanJose

    Additionalinformationisprovidedonprojectsthatareexpectedtoimprovethesafetyofourroadsforpedestriansandbicyclists.AsshowninTable21,$1.3billionisinvestedin77projectsinthe2019TIPthatareidentifiedbytheprojectsponsorsasanticipatedtohaveasignificantimpactonreducingfatalitiesandseriousinjuriesforpedestriansandbicyclists.Safetyofthetransportationsystemincludesmorethanjustthereductionofcollisions.Projectsunrelatedtoreducingcollisionscanalsohavesignificantimpactsonsafetytothetravelingpublic,includingseismicretrofits,securityimprovements,andresiliencyprojects.The2019TIPalsoincludesasignificantinvestmentintheGoldenGateBridgeSuicideDeterrentSafetyBarrier,whichaimstoimpedetheabilityofindividualstojumpoffthebridgeresultinginasaferenvironmentforthelandmarktransportationfacility.ThisprojectwasnotincludedintheHealthyandSafeCommunitiesmeasureforthisanalysis,butdoeshaveanimportantsafetypurpose.

    Table21.2019TIPSafetyImprovementsforPedestrians&Bicyclists

    County Projects Investments

    Alameda 28 $334ContraCosta 3 $23Marin 6 $22Napa 5 $28SanFrancisco 6 $47SanMateo 11 $23SantaClara 13 $237Solano 1 $1Sonoma 2 $1MultipleCounties 2 $594 77 $1,311

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 26 June 18, 2018

    PhysicalActivity:TheTIPincludes136projectsandover$400millioninvestedonprojectsthatareprimarilyfocusedonbicycleandpedestrianimprovementsandprograms,whichenableandencourageactivetransportation.Someofthelargestbicycleandpedestrianinvestmentsinthe2019TIPinclude: $17millionforImprovedBike/PedAccesstoEastSpanoftheSan

    FranciscoEastBayBridge $14millionfortheIronHorseTrailBikeandPedestrianOvercrossingin

    ContraCostaCounty $13millionforOaklands14thStSafeRoutesintheCityproject $12millionfortheNorthSouthGreenwayCapClosureinMarinCounty

    ManyprojectsintheTIPthatarefocusedonothermodesorpurposesalsoincludeimprovementsthatbenefitbicyclistsorpedestrians,suchasapavementrehabilitationprojectthatincludesaddinganewbikelane.Projectsponsorsreporttheshareofeachprojectstotalprojectcostthatcanbeattributedtothevariousmodesthatwillbenefitfromtheproject.Table22displayscountyandregionalinvestmentsinbike/pedestrianprojectsaswellasthetotaldollarsinvestedonallprojectsthatareanticipatedtobenefitbicyclistsandpedestriansoverthefouryearTIPperiod,asreportedbytheprojectsponsors.

    Table22.2019TIPBike&PedestrianInvestments

    Bicycle&PedestrianProjectsProjectswithBicycle&PedestrianElements

    County Projects Investments Projects InvestmentsAlameda 26 $136 50 $137ContraCosta 17 $59 47 $69Marin 10 $26 15 $31Napa 6 $12 12 $18SanFrancisco 10 $26 17 $45SanMateo 20 $28 40 $32SantaClara 32 $97 60 $200Solano 8 $19 15 $24Sonoma 6 $8 16 $12MultipleCounties 1 $3 3 $5 136 $413 276 $573

    AirQuality:ProjectsfundedwithfederalCongestionMitigationAirQuality

    ImprovementProgram(CMAQ),CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard(CARB),orregionalTransportationforCleanAir(TFCA)fundsareexpectedtoimproveairqualitythroughpromotingcleanertechnologiesoralternativemodesoftransportation.Manyotherprojectsinthe2019TIPmayalsosupportimprovedairquality,butthisanalysisfocusedonprojectsfundedwithairqualityspecificfundsources(Table23).

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 27 June 18, 2018

    Afewoftheprojectsfundedthroughairqualityfundingprogramsinthe2019TIPinclude: $50millionforBARTRailcarProcurement $12millionforElectricVehicleInfrastructure/VehicleBuybackprograms $10millionforMTCsClipper2.0FareCollectionSystem $10millionforACEsLocomotiveProcurementproject $7millionforSFMTAsGearyBusRapidTransitproject $5millionforMTCsSparetheAirprogram

    Maps:2019TIPHealthy&SafeCommunities

    Safetyandactivetransportationprojectsaremapped,wherepossible,bycountyandoverlaidagainstCommunitiesofConcerntodisplaytheoverallspatialdistributionofprojectsthatsupporttheregionsgoalstoimprovethehealthandsafetyofregion.Thesemapscanbeviewedstartingon

    pages34.Theseprojectscanalsobeviewedonaninteractivewebmapthatincludeadditionaldataonspatialconcentrationsbyraceandethnicity(https://mtc.ca.gov/ourwork/fundinvest/transportationimprovementprogram).EconomicVitalityProjectsthatreducecongestion,improvereliability,orimprovetransitserviceorcapacityaremostlikelytosupporttheregionalgoaltoincreasetheshareofjobsaccessiblewithin30minutesbycaror45minutesbytransitincongestedconditions.

    RoadCongestion/Reliability:Thereare102roadwayprojectsinthe2019TIP,totalingabout$2billion,whichareidentifiedbyprojectsponsorsashavingaprimarypurposeofreducingcongestionorimprovingsystemreliabilityorareotherwiseanticipatedtosignificantlyimprovecongestionorreliability(Table24).

    Table23.2019TIPAirQualityFocusedInvestmentsCounty Projects InvestmentsAlameda 12 $51ContraCosta 10 $22Marin 6 $5Napa 3 $4SanFrancisco 2 $10SanMateo 13 $9SantaClara 25 $50Solano 8 $10Sonoma 3 $4Multiple 12 $83 94 $248

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 28 June 18, 2018

    Afewoftheseprojectsinthe2019TIPinclude:

    $473millionforUS101ManagedLanes:SanMateoCountySouthofGrandAvetoSantaClaraCountyLine

    $167millionforvariousSHOPPMobilityProgramprojects

    $142millionforUS101/ZankerRoadSkyportDriveN.FourthSt.ImprovementsinSantaClaraCounty

    $66millionforI680SBHOVLaneCompletioninContraCostaCounty

    $47millionfortheEastWestConnectorinFremontandUnionCity

    $22millionfor511NextGenTravelerInformation

    TransitService/Capacity:Thereare33transitprojectsinthe2019TIP,totalingnearly$5billion,whichareidentifiedbyprojectsponsorsashavingaprimarypurposeofreducingcongestionorimprovingsystemreliabilityorareotherwiseanticipatedtosignificantlyimprovecongestionorreliability(Table25).Afewoftheseprojectsinthe2019TIPinclude:

    $2.6billionfortheBARTBerryessatoSanJoseExtension

    $1.1billionfortheBARTTransbayCoreCapacityImprovements

    $598millionfortheTransbayTerminal/CaltrainDowntownExtensionPhase2

    $268millionforVTAsEastridgetoBARTRegionalConnector

    $128millionforCaltrainsPeninsulaCorridorElectrificationExpansion

    $54millionforSFMTAsAdditionalLightRailVehiclestoExpandMuniRailService

    Table24.2019TIPRoadwayCongestion/ReliabilityInvestmentsCounty Projects InvestmentsAlameda 22 $344ContraCosta 15 $159Marin 2 $20Napa 5 $34SanFrancisco 6 $21SanMateo 15 $550SantaClara 18 $580Solano 2 $28Sonoma 3 $9Multiple 14 $238

    102 $1,984

    Table25.2019TIPTransitService/CapacityImprovementsCounty Projects InvestmentsAlameda 4 $20ContraCosta 2 $8Marin 2 $2Napa SanFrancisco 12 $678SanMateo 3 $141SantaClara 3 $2,842Solano 1 $2Sonoma Multiple 6 $1,099 33 $4,793

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 29 June 18, 2018

    Maps:2019TIPEconomicVitality

    Roadcongestionorreliabilityprojectsandtransitserviceorcapacityimprovementprojectsaremapped,wherepossible,bycountyandoverlaidagainstCommunitiesofConcerntodisplaytheoverallspatialdistributionofprojectsthatsupporttheregionsgoalstoimproveeconomicvitality.

    Thesemapscanbeviewedstartingonpage34.Theseprojectscanalsobeviewedonaninteractivewebmapthatincludeadditionaldataonspatialconcentrationsbyraceandethnicity(https://mtc.ca.gov/ourwork/fundinvest/transportationimprovementprogram).TransportationSystemEffectivenessThetransportationsystemeffectivenessgoalareaencompassestwoperformancemeasures:improvedpavementconditionandtransitstateofgoodrepair.Projectsthatincludeapavementorbridgerehabilitationorpreservationcomponentorrehabilitateorreplaceexistingtransitassetsarecompiledforthisportionoftheanalysis.

    PavementandBridgeCondition:Inthe2019TIP,97projectstotaling$2.5billionisinvestedinrehabilitationandpreservationofexistingroadsandbridges(Table26).Afewofthelargerrehabilitationprojectsinthe2019TIPinclude:

    $1billionforvariousSHOPPRoadwayPreservationprojects

    $583millionforvariousSHOPPBridgeRehabilitationandReconstructionprojects

    $303millionfortheregionalTollBridgeRehabilitationProgram

    $207millionforvariousLocalHighwayBridgeProgramprojects

    TransitStateofGoodRepair:Thereare81transitstateofgoodrepairprojectsinthe

    2019TIP,totaling$1.9billionincommittedinvestments.Thetransitinvestmentsinthe2019TIPinclude:

    $737millionfortheBARTRailcarProcurementProgram $210millionfortheCaltrainElectrificationproject $67millionforSFMTAsRailReplacementProgram $62millionfortheClipper2.0FarePaymentSystem $59millionforGGBHTDsDieseltoHybridBusReplacementproject $50millionforVTAsStandardandSmallBusReplacementproject

    Table26.2019TIPPavementandBridgeRehabilitationProjects

    County Projects Investments

    Alameda 14 $36ContraCosta 24 $49Marin 4 $8Napa 3 $6SanFrancisco 2 $200SanMateo 19 $17SantaClara 14 $46Solano 3 $3Sonoma 8 $16Multiple 6 $2,122 97 $2,504

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 30 June 18, 2018

    Maps:2019TIPTransportationSystemEffectiveness

    Pavementandbridgeconditionprojectsandtransitassetmanagementprojectsaremapped,wherepossible,bycountyandoverlaidagainstCommunitiesofConcerntodisplaytheoverallspatialdistributionofprojectsthatsupporttheregionsgoalstoimproveeconomicvitality.These

    mapscanbeviewedstartingonpage34.Theseprojectscanalsobeviewedonaninteractivewebmapthatincludeadditionaldataonspatialconcentrationsbyraceandethnicity(https://mtc.ca.gov/ourwork/fundinvest/transportationimprovementprogram).EquitableAccessTheequitableaccessmeasureestimatestheshareofincomeconsumedbytransportationcostswithagoalofreducingthefinancialburdenontheregionslowestincomeresidents.Thisportionoftheanalysisincorporatesvariousoutputsfromtheregionaltraveldemandmodeltocalculatehouseholdtransportationcostsasashareofhouseholdincome.The2019TIPinvestmentsappeartohaveanegligibleeffectontheshareofincomespentontransportation,acrossallincomelevels,whencomparedtoascenarioinwhichnoneoftheprojectsinthe2019TIPiscompleted(Table28).

    Table27.2019TIPTransitRehabilitation/ReplacementProjects

    Sponsor Projects Investments Sponsor Projects Investments

    ACTransit 5 $56 SamTrans 2 $2ACE 2 $25 SantaRosaBus 3 $5BART 10 $947 SFMTA 14 $326Caltrain 3 $246 SMART CCCTA SolTrans 2 $3ECCTA SonCoTransit 3 $5Fairfield 1 $2 UnionCityTransit 1 $2GGBHTD 12 $135 Vacaville LAVTA VTA 7 $92MCTD 5 $13 WCCTA 6 $9MTCClipper 1 $62 WETA 3 $41NVTA 1

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 31 June 18, 2018

    Theseresultsdonotnecessarilyindicatethattheprojectsinthe2019TIPwillhavenoimpactonhouseholdtransportationcosts.Rather,itismorelikelythatthetravelmodelmaynotbeappropriateforassessingchangesintransportationcostsresultingfromTIPinvestments.Acoupleofnotesaboutthelimitationsofthisapproach:1. Althoughthereismorethan$13billionintransportationinvestmentsprogrammedin

    the2019TIP,manyoftheseprojectswillnotbecompleteduntilafterthe2019TIPperiod.Forexample,majorprojectswithfundsprogrammedforconstructionin2022maynotbecompleteandopentothepublicforanotherseveralyears.Theimpactsoftheseinvestmentswerenotcapturedinthe2022modelyear,butcanbeassumedtohaveaneffectontripsandcost.

    2. Fortheprojectsthatarecompletedby2022,onlyahandfulhaveascopethatisevaluatedinaregionaltravelmodel.Manylocalroadwayandtransitassetprojects,aswellasbicycleandpedestrianprojects,cannotbecapturedintheregionaltravelmodel,butarestillexpectedtohavesignificantcumulativeimpactsontravelintheregion.

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 32 June 18, 2018

    2019TIPInvestmentAnalysisKeyFindingsEquitabledistributionofinvestmentsoverallTheresultsofthepopulationusebasedanalysisindicatethatoverall,theinvestmentsinthe2019TIPdirectanequitableproportionofinvestmentstoprojectsthatsupportthetransportationofresidentsoflowincomehouseholds,racialorethnicminorities,andseniors.

    Theshareofinvestmentssupportingoveralllowincometrips(32%)andtripsmadebyminoritypopulations(57%)exceedstheshareoftripsmadebyeachgroup(27%and52%,respectively).

    Theshareofinvestmentssupportingoveralltraveldistancebylowincomepopulations(24%)andminoritypopulations(52%)alsoslightlyexceedstheshareofoveralldistancetravelledbyeachgroup(22%and50%,respectively).

    Theshareofinvestmentssupportingtrips(10%)andtraveldistance(8%)madebyseniorsisslightlyunder,butstillroughlyequivalent,totheirrelativeshareofeachmeasure(11and10%).

    Variableresultsfortransit,duetosmallnumberofverylargeinvestmentsThereareafewvariancesworthnotinginthepopulationusedbasedanalysisanddisparateimpactanalysis,specificallyrelatedtotransit.

    Theshareoftransitinvestmentsthatsupporttripsmadebypassengersinlow

    incomehouseholds(40%)fallssomewhatshortofthesepassengersrelativeshareofthetransittripstaken(47%).

    Federalandstatetransitinvestmentsresultinapercapitabenefitforminoritiesthatslightlyexceedsthepercapitabenefitfornonminorities(105%ofnonminoritypercapitabenefit).However,onapertransitriderbasis,federalandstatetransitinvestmentsfallshort,withaminorityperriderbenefitof92%ofthenonminorityperriderbenefit.

    Thevariedresultsinthe2019TIPareattributedtoanumberoflargeprojects,including:

    BARTsRailcarProcurementProgram; BARTsTransbayCoreCapacityImprovementsProgram; CaltrainElectrification; CaltrainsPeninsulaCorridorElectrificationExpansion;and TransbayJointPowerAuthoritysCaltrainDowntownExtension.

    Together,thesefiveprojectsaccountforalmost40%ofalltransitfundinginthe2019TIP.Whenfocusingonlyonstateandfederalfunds,theseprojectsaccountforapproximately35%offundingintheTIPperiod.WhileBARTridershipapproximatelymirrorstheregionalridershipshareforminoritypopulations,theshareofBARTridersfromlowincomehouseholdsislessthantheregionalaverageshare.Caltrainisusedbyalowerproportionoflowincomeandminorityridersthantheregionalaveragefortransitriders.

  • Draft 2019 TIP Investment Analysis Page 33 June 18, 2018

    Thedegreeofthevariancesseeninthe2019TIPdisparateimpacttransitanalysisarenotablyimprovedascomparedtothe2017TIP,withtheminoritypertransitriderinvestmentdisbenefitdecreasingfrom89%inthe2017TIPto92%inthe2019TIP.Inaddition,theminoritypercapitatransitinvestmentincreasesfrom96%ofthenonminoritypercapitainvestment(disbenefit)inthe2017TIPto105%ofthenonminoritypercapitainvestment(benefit)inthe2019TIP.Itisimportanttoreemphasize,thattheTIPdoesnotreflectthefullpictureoftransportationinvestmentsintheBayArea.TheTIPonlyincludesfouryearsofneartermfundprogrammingandtendsnottoincludeoperatingandmaintenancefunds,particularlyfortransit.AdditionoftransportationequitymeasuresprovidesopportunityforbetterunderstandingofpotentialequityimpactsForthe2019TIP,additionalinformationisprovidedonprojectsthatsupportPlanBayArea2040stransportationfocusedequitymeasures:HealthyandSafeCommunities,EconomicVitality,TransportationSystemEffectiveness,andEquitableAccess.Althoughtheanalysisdoesnotidentifydirectbenefitsandburdensresultingfromindividualinvestments,itbuildsuponthepopulationusebasedanddisparateimpactanalysestobetterunderstandthenatureoftheprojectsincludedinthe2019TIPandtheiranticipatedeffectsonlongtermregionalgoals.Dataforthetransportationequitymeasuresisselfreportedbyprojectsponsors,thereforetheresultinginformationislimitedbythequalityandconsistencyofthedataprovided.Wherepossible,projectssupportingthetransportationfocusedequitymeasureswerealsomappedtoillustratethelocationof2019investmentsinrelationtoadoptedCOCsaswellascensustractswithconcentrationsofminoritypopulationsthatareaboveregionalaverages.Thegeographicdisplayofprojectsallowsforexaminationandidentificationofanyapparentsystematicexclusionofcommunitiesinthespatialdistributionofbenefits,oranyapparentsystematicimbalancesbetweenthedistributionofprojectsbetweencommunitiesofconcernandtheremainderoftheregion,orbetweenminorityandnonminoritycommunities.Asnotedabove,manyprojectsandadditionaldatacanbeviewedonaninteractivewebmapavailableonhttps://mtc.ca.gov/ourwork/fundinvest/transportationimprovementprogram.

  • 2019 TIP Investment AnalysisAlameda County Project List

    1 AC Transit: East Bay Bus Rapid Transit 39 BART: Traction Power System Renovation2 AC Transit: San Pablo and Telegraph Ave Rapid Bus Upgrades 40 BART:ADA Paratransit Capital Accessibility Improve3 ACE: Platform Extensions 41 BATA: Toll Bridge Maintenance4 ACTC: 7th Street Grade Separation East 42 BATA: Toll Bridge Rehabilitation Program5 ACTC: 7th Street Grade Separation West 43 Berkeley: John Muir Safe Routes to School6 ACTC: East-West Connector in Fremont & Union City 44 Berkeley: Sacramento Street Complete Streets Improvements7 ACTC: Freight Intelligent Transportation System (FITS) 45 Berkeley: Southside Complete Streets & Transit Improvement8 ACTC: I-580/680 Interchange HOV/HOT Widening 46 Caltrans: Oakland to San Jose Double Track (Segment 2A)9 ACTC: I-680 NB HOV/HOT Lane 47 Dublin: Dublin Blvd-North Canyons Pkwy Extension10 ACTC: I-80 Gilman Interchange Reconfiguration 48 Dublin: Dublin Blvd Rehabilitation11 ACTC: I-80/Ashby Avenue Interchange Improvements 49 Dublin: Dublin Boulevard widening12 ACTC: I-880 NB HOV/HOT: North of Hacienda to Hegenberger 50 Dublin: I-580 Interchange Imps at Hacienda/Fallon Rd, Ph 213 ACTC: I-880/Industrial Parkway West Interchange 51 EBRPD: Doolittle Drive Bay Trail 14 ACTC: I-880/West Winton Avenue Interchange 52 Emeryville: Frontage Rd, 65th St and Powell St Pavement Maint15 ACTC: I-880/Whipple Road Interchange Improvements 53 Emeryville: Greenway Crossing Improvements 16 ACTC: Oakland/Alameda Freeway Access Project 54 Fremont: Complete Streets Upgrade of Relinquished SR-8417 ACTC: SR-262 (Mission Blvd) Improvements 55 Fremont: Pavement Rehabilitation18 ACTC: SR-84 widening, South of Ruby Hills Dr to I-680 56 Fremont: Widen Kato Rd from Warren Ave to Milmont Dr19 ACTC: Widen I-680 NB and SB for EL from SR-84 to Alcosta 57 Hayward: I-880 Auxiliary lanes at Industrial Parkway20 Alameda County: Cherryland/Ashland/CastroValley/Fairview BikePed 58 Hayward: I-880/A Street Interchange Reconstruction21 Alameda County: Crow Canyon Safety Improvements 59 Hayward: Main Street Complete Street22 Alameda County: Estuary Bridges Seismic Retrofit and Repairs 60 Hayward: Rt 92/Clawiter/Whitesell Interchange Improvements23 Alameda County: Fruitvale Ave Roadway Bridge Retrofit 61 Hayward: Winton Ave Complete Street 24 Alameda County: Niles Canyon Rd (SR-84)/Pleas-Sunol Rd I/C Imps 62 Livermore: Pavement Rehabilitation - MTS Routes25 Alameda County: Various Streets and Roads Preservation 63 MTC: Bay Bridge Forward-Commuter Parking Initiative26 Alameda County: Vasco Road Safety Improvements 64 MTC: Bay Bridge Forward-West Grand HOV/Bus Only Lane27 Alameda: Central Avenue Safety Improvements 65 MTC: Bay Bridge Forward-West Grand TSP28 Alameda: City-Wide Pavement Rehabilitation 66 MTC: Bay Bridge Park29 Alameda: Clement Avenue Complete Streets 67 MTC: Bike Share Capital Program (Fremont)30 Albany: San Pablo Ave & Buchanan St Pedestrian Improvements 68 MTC: Freeway Performance Program-I-880 Corridor31 BART Car Exchange (Preventive Maintenance) 69 MTC: Freeway Performance Program-SR-8432 BART Train Control Renovation 70 MTC: I-880 Integrated Corridor Management-Central 33 BART Transbay Core Capacity Improvements 71 MTC: Improved Bike/Ped Access to East Span of SFOBB34 BART: 19th Street BART Station Modernization-GO Uptown 72 Newark: Thornton Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation35 BART: Bay Fair Connection 73 Oakland: 14th St Safe Routes in the City36 BART: Fare Collection Equipment 74 Oakland: 19th St BART to Lake Merritt Urban Greenway37 BART: Rail, Way and Structures Program 75 Oakland: 35th Ave Bike/Ped Improvements 38 BART: Railcar Procurement Program 76 Oakland: 42nd Ave. & High St I-880 Access Improvements

    Draft 2019 TIP Page 34

  • 2019 TIP Investment AnalysisAlameda County Project List (Continued)

    77 Oakland: Army Base Infrastructure Improvements78 Oakland: Crossing to Safety79 Oakland: Fruitvale Alive Gap Closure Project80 Oakland: Fruitvale Ave Bike/Ped Improvements81 Oakland: Lake Merritt to Bay Trail Bike/Ped Bridge82 Oakland: Lakeside Family Streets83 Oakland: Shattuck and Claremont Bike/Ped Improvements84 Oakland: Telegraph Ave Bike/Ped Improvements and Road Diet85 Oakland: Telegraph Avenue Complete Streets86 Oakland: Waterfront Bay Trail87 Piedmont: Oakland Avenue Improvements88 Pleasanton: Pavement Rehabilitation Hacienda Business Park89 San Leandro: SR 185-E. 14th St/ Hesperian Blvd/150th Ave90 San Leandro: Washington Avenue Rehabilitation91 Union City: Dyer Street Pavement Rehabilitation92 WETA: Ferry Service-Berkeley

    NOT MAPPEDAC Transit: ADA Paratransit Assistance Union City Transit: Replace Heavy-Duty Transit Vehicles

    AC Transit: Paratransit Van Replacement Union City Transit: Travel Time Improvements

    AC Transit: Purchase (10) 24ft Cut-aways

    AC Transit: Purchase (24) 60ft Artic Hybrid Buses

    AC Transit: Replace (27) 40ft Urban Buses - Hybrid

    AC Transit: Replace (6) 24ft Cut-Away Vans

    ACE: Fixed Guideway (Capital Lease)

    ACE: Locomotive Procurement

    ACE: Railcar Midlife Overhaul

    ACTC: Alameda Safe Routes to School

    Alameda County: Active Oakland Safe Routes to School

    Caltrans: Alameda County - TOS-Mobility

    LAVTA: ADA Paratransit Operating Subsidy

    LAVTA: Livermore Transit Center Rehabilitation and Improvement

    MTC: Bay Bridge Forward - Casual Carpool

    MTC: Bay Bridge Forward - Integrated Bridge Corridor

    MTC: Bay Bridge Forward - Commuter Parking Initiative O&M

    MTC: Regional Planning Activities and PPM - Alameda County

    Oakland: Local Streets and Roads Paving

    Union City Transit: ADA Paratransit Operating Subsidy

    Draft 2019 TIP Page 35

  • 680

    61

    80

    804

    262

    84

    84

    84

    680

    92

    238

    238

    185

    61

    880

    238

    880

    24

    13

    13

    123

    80

    580

    580

    580

    580

    84

    24

    680

    101

    101

    880

    1281011011011041041288121521523333140555331321082199955801323333120991204129954889958510112810111111612812125051215223729580168068061801132208412293725156152152101101130680880878217859280358435353511182380280353511280101221121128128128292912126808080131371211161210110110111444424278080262848484680929223823818561880238880241313123808058058058058084241934529880236160881401085261018024680101101165080659999705113113516165329175101128132280171018801717992361115216016084599205

    Oakland

    Hayward

    Berkeley

    San Mateo

    Pleasanton

    Alameda

    Union City

    Redwood City

    Livermore

    San Leandro

    Albany

    Hillsborough

    Dublin

    Moraga

    Foster City

    Orinda

    Tracy

    San Ramon

    Lafayette

    East Palo Alto

    Burlingame

    Belmont

    Emeryville

    San Carlos

    Piedmont

    Danville

    Newark

    Fremont

    13

    11

    43

    7

    3030

    30

    1616

    6671

    15

    53

    4410

    60

    24

    58

    17

    14

    78

    67

    21

    9

    19

    79

    75

    48

    26

    18

    83

    83

    74

    12

    27 29

    5454

    4

    86

    86 86

    8686

    86

    8686

    86

    86

    8485

    73

    8082

    45

    51

    5

    20

    57

    56

    81

    49

    8 8

    6

    MTC Community of Concern(ACS 2012-2016)

    Active Transportation Project

    Safety Project

    Safety and Active Transportation Project

    Note: maps include only mappable projects. For non-mappable projects, refer to county project lists.

    Map Author: JC 4/27/2018Original Files: https://mtcdrive.box.com/s/7cewm4m1ro77q0syr74g03a39wp5ebgq

    2019 TIP Investment AnalysisAlameda County: Healthly and Safe Communities Projects

    Draft 2019 TIP Page 36

  • 680

    61

    80

    804

    262

    84

    84

    84

    680

    92

    238

    238

    185

    61

    880

    238

    880

    24

    13

    13

    123

    80

    580

    580

    580

    580

    84

    24

    680

    101

    101

    880

    1281011011011041041288121521523333140555331321082199955801323333120991204129954889958510112810111111612812125051215223729580168068061801132208412293725156152152101101130680880878217859280358435353511182380280353511280101221121128128128292912126808080131371211161210110110111444424278080262848484680929223823818561880238880241313123808058058058058084241934529880236160881401085261018024680101101165080659999705113113516165329175101128132280171018801717992361115216016084599205

    Oakland

    Walnut Creek

    Hayward

    Berkeley

    San Mateo

    Pleasanton

    Alameda

    Union City

    Redwood City

    Livermore

    San Leandro

    Albany

    Hillsborough

    Dublin

    Moraga

    Foster City

    Orinda

    Tracy

    San Ramon

    Lafayette

    East Palo Alto

    Burlingame

    Belmont

    Emeryville

    San Carlos

    Piedmont

    Danville

    Newark

    Fremont

    89

    13

    11

    716

    16

    15

    5050

    10

    60

    3

    358

    17

    14

    35

    6363

    63

    67

    9

    19

    92 38

    38

    38

    38

    38

    18

    12

    70

    654

    64

    5

    57

    49

    1

    8

    8

    2

    2

    6

    46

    33

    33

    33

    33

    33

    68

    69

    MTC Community of Concern(ACS 2012-2016)

    Roadway Congestion and/or ReliabilityTransit Congestion and/or Reliability

    Note: maps include only mappable projects. For non-mappable projects, refer to county project lists.

    Map Author: JC 4/27/2018Original Files: https://mtcdrive.box.com/s/7cewm4m1ro77q0syr74g03a39wp5ebgq

    2019 TIP Investment AnalysisAlameda County: Economic Vitality Projects

    Draft 2019 TIP Page 37

  • 680

    61

    80

    804

    262

    84

    84

    84

    680

    92

    238

    238

    185

    61

    880

    238

    880

    24

    13

    13

    123

    80

    580

    580

    580

    580

    84

    24

    24

    680

    101

    101

    880

    1281011011011041041288121521523333140555331321082199955801323333120991204129954889958510112810111111612812125051215223729580168068061801132208412293725156152152101101130680880878217859280358435353511182380280353511280101221121128128128292912126808080131371211161210110110111444424278080262848484680929223823818561880238880241313123808058058058058084241934529880236160881401085261018024680101101165080659999705113113516165329175101128132280171018801717992361115216016084599205

    Oakland

    Walnut Creek

    Hayward

    Berkeley

    San Mateo

    Pleasanton

    Alameda

    Union City

    Redwood City

    Livermore

    San Leandro

    Albany

    Hillsborough

    Dublin

    Moraga

    Foster City

    Orinda

    Tracy

    San Ramon

    Lafayette

    East Palo Alto

    Burlingame

    Belmont

    Emeryville

    San Carlos

    Piedmont

    Danville

    Newark

    Fremont

    25

    25

    25

    25

    2548

    61

    5555

    55

    55 5555

    5555 55

    55

    5555

    52

    5252

    8742

    42

    42

    72

    45

    88

    28

    28

    90

    6262

    91

    MTC Community of Concern(ACS 2012-2016)

    Rehabilitation Project

    Note: maps include only mappable projects. For non-mappable projects, refer to county project lists.

    Map Author: JC 4/27/2018Original Files: https://mtcdrive.box.com/s/7cewm4m1ro77q0syr74g03a39wp5ebgq

    2019 TIP Investment AnalysisAlameda County: Transportation System Effectiveness-Pavement and Bridge Condition Projects

    Draft 2019 TIP Page 38

  • 2019 TIP Investment AnalysisContra Costa County Project List

    1 AC Transit: San Pablo and Telegraph Ave Rapid Bus Upgrades 39 Contra Costa County: Kirker Pass Road NB Truck Climbing Lanes 2 Antioch: L Street Pathway to Transit 40 Contra Costa County: Kirker Pass Road Open Grade Overlay3 Antioch: Laurel Road Extension 41 Contra Costa County: Local Streets and Roads Preservation4 Antioch: Pavement Rehabilitation 42 Contra Costa County: Pacheco Blvd Sidewalk Gap Closure Phase 35 Antioch: Slatten Ranch Road Extension 43 Contra Costa County: Vasco Road Safety Improvements6 BART Car Exchange (Preventive Maintenance) 44 Danville: Camino Ramon Improvements7 BART Train Control Renovation 45 Danville: Diablo Road Imps. - Green Valley to Avenida Neuva8 BART Transbay Core Capacity Improvements 46 Danville: San Ramon Valley Blvd Lane Addition and Overlay 9 BART: Concord BART Station Modernization 47 El Cerrito Blvd: Carlson Blvd and Central Ave Pavement Rehab10 BART: Fare Collection Equipment 48 El Cerrito: El Cerrito del Norte Area TOD Complete Street Imps11 BART: Rail, Way and Structures Program 49 El Cerrito: Ohlone Greenway Station Area Bike/Ped Improvements12 BART: Railcar Procurement Program 50 Hercules: Sycamore/Willow Pavement Rehabilitation13 BART: Traction Power System Renovation 51 Lafayette: Pleasant Hill Rd Pavement Rehab & Maintenance14 BART:ADA Paratransit Capital Accessibility Improve 52 Martinez: Downtown Streets Rehabilitation 15 BATA: Toll Bridge Maintenance 53 Moraga: Moraga Way and Canyon/Camino Pablo Improvements16 BATA: Toll Bridge Rehabilitation Program 54 MTC: ALA/CC-80 and Bay Bridge Approach Express Lanes17 Brentwood: Brentwood Blvd Widening-(Phase I) North 55 MTC: Bike Share Capital Program (Richmond)18 Brentwood: Brentwood Blvd Widening Phase II 56 MTC: Richmond-San Rafael Bridge Access Improvements19 Brentwood: John Muir Parkway Extension: Phase II 57 Oakley: Civic Center Railroad Platform Park & Ride Complex20 Brentwood: Various Streets and Roads Preservation 58 Oakley: Street Repair and Resurfacing21 CCTA: I-680 Advanced Techologies 59 Orinda: Orinda Way Pavement Rehabilitation22 CCTA: I-680 Bus On Shoulder 60 Pinole: San Pablo Avenue Rehabilitation23 CCTA: I-680 SB HOV Lane Completion 61 Pittsburg: BART Pedestrian and Bicycle Connectivity24 CCTA: I-680/SR 4 Interchange Reconstruction-Phase 3 62 Pittsburg: Pavement Improvements25 CCTA: I-680/SR 4 Interchange Reconstruction-Phases I & II 63 Pleasant Hill: Road Improvements26 CCTA: Mokelumne Trail Bike/Ped Overcrossing 64 Richmond: Citywide Pavement Rehab ADA Improvement27 CCTA: Reconstruct I-80/San Pablo Dam Rd Interchange 65 Richmond: I-80/Central Avenue Interchange Modification28 CCTA: SR-4 Operational Improvements-Initial Phases 66 Richmond: Lincoln Elementary SRTS Pedestrian Enhancements29 Clayton: Neighborhood Street Rehab 67 San Pablo: Market Street Pavement Rehabilitation30 Concord: Commerce Ave Complete Streets 68 San Pablo: Rumrill Blvd Complete Streets Improvements31 Concord: Downtown Corridors Bike/Pedestrian Improvements 69 San Ramon: Alcosta Boulevard Pavement Rehab32 Concord: Monument Boulevard Class I Path 70 San Ramon: Crow Canyon Rd Widening (Alcosta to Indian Rice)33 Concord: Willow Pass Road Repaving and 6th St SRTS 71 San Ramon: Iron Horse Trail Bike and Pedestrian Overcrossing34 Concord: Ygnacio Valley Road Widening 72 Walnut Creek: BART TOD Access Improvements35 Contra Costa County: Bailey Road-SR-4 Interchange 73 Walnut Creek: N. Main St Rehab-I-680 to California36 Contra Costa County: Bailey Road Bike and Pedestrian Improvements 74 Walnut Creek: Ygancio Valley & Oak Grove Road Rehabilitation37 Contra Costa County: Camino Tassajara Realignment 75 WETA: Richmond Ferry Service38 Contra Costa County: Fred Jackson Way First/Last Mile Connection

    Draft 2019 TIP Page 39

  • 2019 TIP Investment AnalysisContra Costa County Project List

    NOT MAPPEDAC Transit: ADA Paratransit Assistance

    AC Transit: Paratransit Van Replacement

    AC Transit: Purchase (10) 24ft Cut-aways

    AC Transit: Purchase (24) 60ft Artic Hybrid Buses

    AC Transit: Replace (27) 40ft Urban Buses - Hybrid

    AC Transit: Replace (6) 24ft Cut-Away Vans

    CCCTA: County Connection ADA Paratransit Assistance

    CCTA: SR 239 - New State Highway Study

    Contra Costa County: West County Walk and Bike Leaders

    EBRPD: Conta Costa Parks Bike/Ped Trail Improvements

    ECCTA: Tri-Delta ADA Operating Assistance

    MTC: Regional Planning Activities and PPM - Contra Costa County

    San Ramon: San Ramon Valley Street Smarts

    Walnut Creek: Parking Guidance System Pilot

    WCCTA: WestCAT ADA Paratransit Operating Subsidy

    WCCTA: WestCAT Purchase (6) Electronic Fareboxes

    WCCTA: WestCAT Purchase (9) Electronic Fareboxes

    WCCTA: WestCAT Purchase of (2) Radio Systems

    WCCTA: WestCAT Replace (2) DAR MiniVans

    WCCTA: WestCAT Replace (6) 2008 35ft Revenue Vehicles

    WCCTA: WestCAT Replace (5) 35ft and (4) 40ft Vehicles

    Draft 2019 TIP Page 40

  • 680

    61

    80

    29

    280

    4

    4

    4

    4

    242

    78080

    185

    61

    24

    13

    13

    123

    80

    80

    580

    580

    580

    24

    24

    680

    Discovery Bay

    Orinda

    San Ramon

    Port Costa

    Dublin

    Rodeo

    PleasantHill

    Brentwood

    Danville

    Alamo

    San Pablo

    OakleyMartinez

    Moraga

    Clayton

    Pinole

    EmeryvillePiedmont

    Bay Point

    Hercules

    Blackhawk

    Crockett

    Bethel Island

    Byron

    Lafayette

    El Sobrante

    Albany

    Kensington

    El Cerrito

    Benicia

    Richmond

    Vallejo

    San Leandro

    Antioch

    Berkeley

    Concord

    Alameda

    Pittsburg

    Walnut Creek

    Castro Valley

    Oakland

    San Francisco

    48

    26

    71

    27

    42 35

    24

    6655

    4353

    53

    31

    2

    36

    49

    68

    38

    61

    6337

    30

    33 33

    32

    49

    MTC Community of Concern(ACS 2012-2016)

    Active Transportation Project

    Safety Project

    Safety and Active Transportation Project

    Note: maps include only mappable projects. For non-mappable projects, refer to county project lists.

    Map Author: JC 4/27/2018Original Files: https://mtcdrive.box.com/s/7cewm4m1ro77q0syr74g03a39wp5ebgq

    2019 TIP Investment AnalysisContra Costa County: Healthy and Safe Communities Projects

    Draft 2019 TIP Page 41

  • 680

    61

    80

    29

    280

    4

    4

    4

    4

    242

    78080

    185

    61

    24

    13

    13

    123

    80

    80

    580

    580

    580

    24

    24

    680

    Discovery Bay

    Orinda

    San Ramon

    Port Costa

    Dublin

    Rodeo

    PleasantHill

    Brentwood

    Danville

    Alamo

    San Pablo

    OakleyMartinez

    Moraga

    Clayton

    Pinole

    EmeryvillePiedmont

    Bay Point

    Hercules

    Blackhawk

    Crockett

    Bethel Island

    Byron

    Lafayette

    El Sobrante

    Albany

    Kensington

    El Cerrito

    Benicia

    Richmond

    Vallejo

    San Leandro

    Antioch

    Berkeley

    Concord

    Alameda

    Pittsburg

    Walnut Creek

    Castro Valley

    Oakland

    San Francisco

    48

    65

    27

    25

    55

    34

    18

    21

    12

    12

    22

    3

    5

    17

    28

    70

    1

    23

    75

    56

    8

    8

    54

    MTC Community of Concern(ACS 2012-2016)

    Roadway Congestion and/or ReliabilityTransit Congestion and/or Reliability

    Note: maps include only mappable projects. For non-mappable projects, refer to county project lists.

    Map Author: JC 4/27/2018Original Files: https://mtcdrive.box.com/s/7cewm4m1ro77q0syr74g03a39wp5ebgq

    2019 TIP Investment AnalysisContra Costa County: Economic Vitality Projects

    Draft 2019 TIP Page 42

  • 680

    61

    80

    29

    280

    4

    4

    4

    4

    242

    78080

    185

    61

    24

    13

    13

    123

    80

    80

    580

    580

    580

    24

    24

    680

    Discovery Bay

    Orinda

    San Ramon

    Port Costa

    Dublin

    Rodeo

    PleasantHill

    Brentwood

    Danville

    Alamo

    San Pablo

    OakleyMartinez

    Moraga

    Clayton

    Pinole

    EmeryvillePiedmont

    Bay Point

    Hercules

    Blackhawk

    Crockett

    Bethel Island

    Byron

    Lafayette

    El Sobrante

    Albany

    Kensington

    El Cerrito

    Benicia

    Richmond

    Vallejo

    San Leandro

    Antioch

    Berkeley

    Concord

    Alameda

    Pittsburg

    Walnut Creek

    Castro Valley

    Oakland

    San Francisco

    40

    4

    4

    4

    4

    74

    5860

    45

    51

    64

    64

    64

    64 64

    64

    5252

    16

    16

    16

    16

    46

    73

    47

    59

    2020

    2020

    50

    5 0

    63

    69

    44

    30

    4141

    41

    67

    33 33

    62

    62

    29

    29

    29

    29

    29

    29

    MTC Community of Concern(ACS 2012-2016)

    Rehabilitation Project

    Note: maps include only mappable projects. For non-mappable projects, refer to county project lists.

    Map Author: JC 4/27/2018Original Files: https://mtcdrive.box.com/s/7cewm4m1ro77q0syr74g03a39wp5ebgq

    2019 TIP Investment AnalysisContra Costa County: Transportation System Effectiveness-Pavement and Bridge Condition Projects

    Draft 2019 TIP Page 43

  • 2019 TIP Investment AnalysisMarin County Project List

    1 BATA: Toll Bridge Maintenance NOT MAPPED2 BATA: Toll Bridge Rehabilitation Program Caltrans: Marin County - TOS-Mobility3 Corte Madera: Central Marin Regional Pathway Gap Closure GGBHTD: Facilities Rehabilitation4 Corte Madera: Paradise Drive Multiuse Path GGBHTD: Ferry Propulsion Systems Replacement5 GGBHTD: Ferry Channel & Berth Dredging GGBHTD: Fixed Guideway Connectors6 GGBHTD: Golden Gate Bridge-Suicide Deterrent Safety Barrier GGBHTD: Purchase (7) Hybrid Buses7 GGBHTD: Golden Gate Bridge Seismic Retrofit, Phase 1-3A GGBHTD: Replace (14) 22' Gas Body-on-Chassis Vehicles8 GGBHTD: Golden Gate Bridge Seismic Retrofit, Phase 3B GGBHTD: Replace (2) Paratransit Vehicles 9 GGBHTD: Larkspur Ferry Terminal Parking Garage GGBHTD: Replace (67) Diesel Buses with Hybrid Buses10 GGBHTD: San Rafael Transit Center Relocation GGBHTD: Replace (7) 40' Diesel Buses11 Marin County: Hicks Valley/Marshall Petaluma/Wilson Hill Rd Rehab GGBHTD: Replace Paratransit Vehicles12 Marin County: Mountain View Rd Bridge Replacement GGBHTD: Transit Systems Enhancements13 MTC: Richmond-San Rafael Bridge Access Improvements MCTD: ADA Paratransit Assistance14 Novato: Carmel Open Space Acquisition MCTD: Preventive Maintenance15 Novato: Downtown SMART Station Commuter Lot MCTD: Relocate Transit Maintenance Facility16 Novato: Hill Recreation Area Improvements MCTD: Replace Articulated Vehicles17 Novato: Measure A Group 10 Pavement Rehabilitation MCTD: Replace Diesel Vehicles18 Novato: Novato Boulevard Widening, Diablo to Grant MCTD: Replace Shuttle Vehicles19 Novato: Vineyard Road Improvements MTC: Regional Planning Activities and PPM - Marin County20 NPS: Fort Baker's Vista Point Trail Novato: Downtown SMART Station Commuter Lot21 San Anselmo: Bike Spine TAM/SCTA: Bike Share Capital Program (SMART Corridor in Marin and

    Sonoma Counties)

    22 San Anselmo: Center Blvd Bridge Replace 23 San Anselmo: Sir Francis Drake Blvd Pavement Rehabilitation24 San Rafael: Francisco Blvd East Sidewalk Widening25 San Rafael: Francisco Blvd West Multi-Use Pathway26 San Rafael: Grand Avenue Bicycle Pedestrian Improvements27 Sausalito: Bridgeway/US 101 Off Ramp Bicycle Imps28 SMART: Larkspur Extension29 TAM: North-South Greenway Gap Closure30 TAM: US 101 HOV Lanes-Marin-Sonoma Narrows (Marin)

    Draft 2019 TIP Page 44

  • 1

    580

    1

    680

    80

    29

    37

    221

    29 12

    12

    680

    80

    131

    37

    121116

    12

    101

    101

    101

    1

    1

    4

    4

    242

    78080

    24

    13

    13

    123

    80

    80

    580

    24

    24

    Pleasant Hill

    TiburonLafayette

    San Anselmo

    Emeryville

    Albany

    FairfaxMartinez

    El Cerrito

    Larkspur

    Petaluma

    Cotati

    San Pablo

    CorteMadera

    Benicia

    Moraga

    Mill Valley

    American Canyon

    Piedmont

    Orinda

    Hercules

    Sausalito

    Novato

    Ross

    Pinole

    Sonoma

    Bolinas

    Inverness

    Port Costa

    Stinson Beach

    Dillon Beach

    Boyes Hot Springs

    Muir Beach

    Crockett

    Bodega Bay

    Belvedere

    El Sobrante

    Santa Venetia

    Kensington

    Green Valley

    Pacheco

    Kentfield

    Point Reyes Station

    El Sobrante

    Tomales

    Rodeo

    Berkeley

    Napa

    San Rafael

    Fairfield

    Richmond

    Vallejo

    Walnut Creek

    27

    2226

    30

    4

    18

    29 29

    2425

    21

    20

    19

    23

    3

    16

    MTC Community of Concern(ACS 2012-2016)

    Active Transportation Project

    Safety Project

    Safety and Active Transportation Project

    Note: maps include only mappable projects. For non-mappable projects, refer to county project lists.

    Map Author: JC 4/27/2018Original Files: https://mtcdrive.box.com/s/7cewm4m1ro77q0syr74g03a39wp5ebgq

    2019 TIP Investment AnalysisMarin County: Healthy and Safe Communities Projects

    Draft 2019 TIP Page 45

  • 1

    580

    1

    680

    80

    29

    37

    221

    29 12

    12

    680

    80

    131

    37

    121116

    12

    101

    101

    101

    1

    1

    4

    4

    242

    78080

    24

    13

    13

    123

    80

    80

    580

    24

    24

    Pleasant Hill

    TiburonLafayette

    San Anselmo

    Emeryville

    Albany

    FairfaxMartinez

    El Cerrito

    Larkspur

    Petaluma

    Cotati

    San Pablo

    CorteMadera

    Benicia

    Moraga

    Mill Valley

    American Canyon

    Piedmont

    Orinda

    Hercules

    Sausalito

    Novato

    Ross

    Pinole

    Sonoma

    Bolinas

    Inverness

    Port Costa

    Stinson Beach

    Dillon Beach

    Boyes Hot Springs

    Muir Beach

    Crockett

    Bodega Bay

    Belvedere

    El Sobrante

    Santa Venetia

    Kensington

    Green Valley

    Pacheco

    Kentfield

    Point Reyes Station

    El Sobrante

    Tomales

    Rodeo

    Berkeley

    Napa

    San Rafael

    Fairfield

    Richmond

    Vallejo

    Walnut Creek

    30

    78

    2813

    MTC Community of Concern(ACS 2012-2016)

    Roadway Congestion and/or ReliabilityTransit Congestion and/or Reliability

    Note: maps include only mappable projects. For non-mappable projects, refer to county project lists.

    Map Author: JC 4/27/2018Original Files: https://mtcdrive.box.com/s/7cewm4m1ro77q0syr74g03a39wp5ebgq

    2019 TIP Investment AnalysisMarin County: Economic Vitality Projects

    Draft 2019 TIP Page 46

  • 1

    580

    1

    680

    80

    29

    37

    221

    29 12

    12

    680

    80

    131

    37

    121116

    12

    101

    101

    101

    1

    1

    4

    4

    242

    78080

    24

    13

    13

    123

    80

    80

    580

    24

    24

    Pleasant Hill

    TiburonLafayette

    San Anselmo

    Emeryville

    Albany

    FairfaxMartinez

    El Cerrito

    Larkspur

    Petaluma

    Cotati

    San Pablo

    CorteMadera

    Benicia

    Moraga

    Mill Valley

    American Canyon

    Piedmont

    Orinda

    Hercules

    Sausalito

    Novato

    Ross

    Pinole

    Sonoma

    Bolinas

    Inverness

    Port Costa

    Stinson Beach

    Dillon Beach

    Boyes Hot Springs

    Muir Beach

    Crockett

    Bodega Bay

    Belvedere

    El Sobrante

    Santa Venetia

    Kensington

    Green Valley

    Pacheco

    Kentfield

    Point Reyes Station

    El Sobrante

    Tomales

    Rodeo

    Berkeley

    Napa

    San Rafael

    Fairfield

    Richmond

    Vallejo

    Walnut Creek

    2

    11 11

    19

    23

    17

    MTC Community of Concern(ACS 2012-2016)

    Rehabilitation Project

    Note: maps include only mappable projects. For non-mappable projects, refer to county project lists.

    Map Author: JC 4/27/2018Original Files: https://mtcdrive.box.com/s/7cewm4m1ro77q0syr74g03a39wp5ebgq

    2019 TIP Investment AnalysisMarin County: Transportation System Effectiveness-Pavement and Bridge Condition Projects

    Draft 2019 TIP Page 47

  • 2019 TIP Investment AnalysisNapa County Project List

    1 American Canyon: Devlin Road and Vine Trail Extension NOT MAPPED2 American Canyon: Eucalyptus Drive Realignment Complete Streets MTC: Regional Planning Activities and PPM - Napa County3 American Canyon: Green Island Road Class I Napa County: 2014 Earthquake Pavement Repair4 Calistoga: SR-128 and Petrified Forest Intersection Improvements NVTA: Napa Vine ADA Operating Assistance5 Napa County: Airport Boulevard Rehabilitation NVTA: Napa Vine Equipment Replacement and Upgrades6 Napa County: Hardin Rd Bridge Replacement VVTA: Napa Vine Operating Assistance7 Napa County: Loma Vista Dr Bridge Replacement 8 Napa County: Silverado Trail Phase L Rehab9 Napa: California Boulevard Roundabouts10 Napa: Silverado Trail Five-Way Intersection Improvements11 Napa: SR 29 Bicycle & Pedestrian Undercrossing12 Napa: Vine Trail Gap Closure-Soscol Avenue Corridor13 NVTA: Napa Valley Vine Trail Calistoga-St. Helena Segment14 NVTA: SR 12/29/221 Soscol Junction Interchange Improvements15 NVTA: Vine Transit Bus Maintenance Facility16 St. Helena: Main Street Pedestrian Improvements17 Yountville: Hopper Creek Pedestrian Bridge and Path Project

    Draft 2019 TIP Page 48

  • 12

    29

    68037

    221

    121

    128128

    128

    29

    29

    12

    12

    68080

    121116

    12

    101

    16

    29

    Yountville

    Green Valley

    Calistoga

    Petaluma

    Sonoma

    American Canyon

    Angwin

    Rohnert Park

    St. Helena

    Glen Ellen

    Deer Park

    Santa Rosa

    Fairfield

    Napa9

    10

    14

    11

    4

    17

    3

    16

    13

    128

    MTC Community of Concern(ACS 2012-2016)

    Active Transportation Project

    Safety Project

    Safety and Active Transportation Project

    Note: maps include only mappable projects. For non-mappable projects, refer to county project lists.

    Map Author: JC 4/27/2018Original Files: https://mtcdrive.box.com/s/7cewm4m1ro77q0syr74g03a39wp5ebgq

    2019 TIP Investment AnalysisNapa County: Healthy and Safe Communities Projects

    Draft 2019 TIP Page 49

  • 12

    29

    68037

    221

    121

    128128

    128

    29

    29

    12

    12

    68080

    121116

    12

    101

    16

    29

    Yountville

    Green Valley

    Calistoga

    Petaluma

    Sonoma

    American Canyon

    Angwin

    Rohnert Park

    St. Helena

    Glen Ellen

    Deer Park

    Santa Rosa

    Fairfield

    Napa 9 10

    14

    1

    2

    MTC Community of Concern(ACS 2012-2016)