Investment Management Institute...
Transcript of Investment Management Institute...
© Practising Law Institute
To order this book, call (800) 260-4PLI or fax us at (800) 321-0093. Ask our Customer Service Department for PLI Order Number 180869, Dept. BAV5.
Practising Law Institute1177 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036
Investment Management Institute
2017
Volume One
CORPORATE LAW AND PRACTICECourse Handbook Series
Number B-2309
Co-ChairsBarry P. Barbash
Paul F. Roye
© Practising Law Institute
26
The DOL Fiduciary Rule (PowerPoint slides)
Erin K. Cho
Groom Law Group, Chartered
Jason Bortz
Capital Research and Management Company
Peter E. Haller
Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP
If you find this article helpful, you can learn more about the subject by going to www.pli.edu to view the on demand program or segment for which it was written.
1-317
© Practising Law Institute
1-318
© Practising Law Institute
PLI
–In
vest
men
t Man
agem
ent I
nstit
ute
2017
:Th
e D
OL
Fidu
ciar
y R
ule
Mar
ch 2
3, 2
017
1-319
© Practising Law Institute
Age
nda
I.In
trodu
ctio
nII.
Def
initi
on o
f a F
iduc
iary
und
er th
e Fi
nal R
ule
III.
Exc
eptio
n to
the
Def
initi
on o
f “In
vest
men
t Adv
ice”
IV.
Pro
hibi
ted
Tran
sact
ion
Exe
mpt
ions
(new
and
am
ende
d)V
.Im
plic
atio
ns fo
r Ass
et M
anag
ers
VI.
Impl
emen
tatio
n D
ates
VII.
Rec
ent J
udic
ial A
ffirm
atio
n of
Rul
eV
III.
Em
ergi
ng Is
sues
and
Tre
nds
IX.
Q&
A
2
1-320
© Practising Law Institute
Intro
duct
ion
33
1-321
© Practising Law Institute
Intro
duct
ion
Em
ploy
ee R
etire
men
t Inc
ome
Sec
urity
Act
of 1
974
(ER
ISA
) D
uty
of p
rude
nce
and
loya
ltyP
erso
nal l
iabi
lity
for f
iduc
iary
bre
ach
Pla
n lo
sses
D
isgo
rgem
ent o
f pro
fits
Exc
ise
tax
on s
elf-d
ealin
g pr
ohib
ited
trans
actio
nsC
o-fid
ucia
ry li
abilit
yTi
tle I
of E
RIS
A do
es n
ot a
pply
to IR
As
4
1-322
© Practising Law Institute
Intro
duct
ion
(con
t.)
ER
ISA
Pla
nsP
lan
spon
sors
and
par
ticip
ants
cou
ld s
ue u
nder
ER
ISA
for f
iduc
iary
br
each
IRA
s IRA
owne
rs d
o no
t hav
e a
stat
utor
y rig
ht o
f act
ion
for f
iduc
iary
bre
ach
IRS
can
enf
orce
pro
hibi
ted
trans
actio
n ex
cise
taxe
sC
reat
e a
cont
ract
ual c
laim
for f
iduc
iary
bre
ach?
Yes
, und
er B
IC
Exe
mpt
ion
5
1-323
© Practising Law Institute
Intro
duct
ion
(con
t.)
On
Apr
il 6,
201
6, th
e D
OL
issu
ed fi
nal r
egul
atio
ns e
xpan
ding
the
defin
ition
of
fiduc
iary
to e
mpl
oyee
pla
ns a
nd IR
As
for p
urpo
ses
of E
RIS
A an
d re
late
d pr
ovis
ions
un
der S
ectio
n 49
75 o
f the
Inte
rnal
Rev
enue
Cod
e (th
e C
ode)
The
suite
of r
egul
atio
ns a
nd n
ew a
nd a
men
ded
clas
s ex
empt
ions
(col
lect
ivel
y, th
e fin
al ru
le) i
nclu
des
the
follo
win
g:Fi
nal r
egul
atio
n re
-def
inin
g w
ho is
a “f
iduc
iary
” by
reas
on o
f pro
vidi
ng in
vest
men
t adv
ice
to
a pl
an o
r IR
AB
est I
nter
est C
ontra
ct e
xem
ptio
n (B
IC)
Prin
cipa
l Tra
nsac
tion
exem
ptio
nA
men
dmen
ts to
sev
eral
exi
stin
g pr
ohib
ited
trans
actio
n cl
ass
exem
ptio
ns (g
ener
ally
lim
its
the
avai
labi
lity
of th
ese
amen
ded
exem
ptio
ns, a
nd a
lso
impo
ses
the
Impa
rtial
Con
duct
S
tand
ards
)P
TEs
-75-
1, 7
7-4,
80-
83, 8
3-1,
84-
24 a
nd 8
6-12
8Fi
nal r
egul
atio
n, a
men
dmen
ts to
cla
ss e
xem
ptio
ns, a
nd c
erta
in c
ondi
tions
of t
he B
IC,
not a
pplic
able
unt
il A
pril
10, 2
017,
and
cer
tain
dis
clos
ure
and
othe
r pro
visi
ons
not
appl
icab
le u
ntil
Janu
ary
1, 2
018
6
1-324
© Practising Law Institute
Def
initi
on o
f Fid
ucia
ry u
nder
Fin
al R
ule
77
1-325
© Practising Law Institute
Def
initi
on o
f Fid
ucia
ry u
nder
Fin
al R
ule
Und
er E
RIS
A S
ectio
n 3(
21),
a pe
rson
is a
fidu
ciar
y if
the
pers
on –
Exe
rcis
es a
ny d
iscr
etio
n ov
er th
e m
anag
emen
t or i
nves
tmen
t of t
he E
RIS
A P
lan’
s or
IRA’
s as
sets
;R
ende
rs in
vest
men
t adv
ice
for a
fee
or o
ther
com
pens
atio
n, d
irect
or i
ndire
ct,
with
resp
ect t
o an
y m
oney
or o
ther
pro
perty
of t
he P
lan,
or h
as a
ny a
utho
rity
or
resp
onsi
bilit
y to
do
so, o
rH
as a
ny d
iscr
etio
n ov
er th
e pl
an’s
adm
inis
tratio
nTh
e fin
al ru
le is
not
abo
ut “d
iscr
etio
nary
” inv
estm
ent m
anag
emen
t
8
1-326
© Practising Law Institute
Def
initi
on o
f Fid
ucia
ry u
nder
Fin
al R
ule
(con
t.)
Fina
l rul
e de
finin
g fid
ucia
ry is
muc
h br
oade
r tha
n th
e ol
d fiv
e-pa
rt te
st:
Und
er th
e ru
le is
sued
by
the
DO
L in
197
5, a
per
son
wou
ld b
e an
“inv
estm
ent
advi
ce fi
duci
ary”
if th
e pe
rson
: (1)
rend
ers
advi
ce a
s to
the
valu
e of
sec
uriti
es o
r m
akes
reco
mm
enda
tions
as to
the
advi
sabi
lity
of in
vest
ing
in, p
urch
asin
g or
se
lling
sec
uriti
es; (
2) o
n a
regu
lar b
asis
; (3)
pur
suan
t to
a m
utua
l agr
eem
ent,
arra
ngem
ent o
r und
erst
andi
ng th
at; (
4) th
e ad
vice
will
ser
ve a
s th
e pr
imar
y ba
sis
for i
nves
tmen
t dec
isio
ns, a
nd th
at; (
5) th
e ad
vice
will
be
indi
vidu
aliz
edba
sed
on th
e pa
rticu
lar n
eeds
of t
he p
lan
Und
er th
e fiv
e-pa
rt te
st, r
egul
atio
n di
stin
guis
hed
sale
s co
nver
satio
ns fr
om
tailo
red
advi
ceD
OL’
s vi
ew is
that
bro
kers
, RIA
s, c
onsu
ltant
s an
d ot
hers
pla
y a
cent
ral r
ole
in s
hapi
ng p
lan
and
IRA
inve
stm
ents
, but
wer
e no
t bei
ng h
eld
acco
unta
ble
and
wer
e ab
le to
avo
id fi
duci
ary
stat
us a
nd o
blig
atio
ns
9
1-327
© Practising Law Institute
Def
initi
on o
f Fid
ucia
ry u
nder
Fin
al R
ule
(con
t.)
10
A re
com
men
datio
n as
to h
ow se
curit
ies o
r inv
estm
ent
prop
erty
shou
ld b
e in
vest
ed a
fter a
rollo
ver,
trans
fer o
r di
strib
utio
n to
or f
rom
an
IRA
A re
com
men
datio
n as
to th
e m
anag
emen
t of s
ecur
ities
or
othe
r inv
estm
ent p
rope
rty, i
nclu
ding
, but
not
lim
ited
to,
reco
mm
enda
tions
on:
•In
vest
men
t pol
icie
s or s
trate
gies
•Po
rtfol
io c
ompo
sitio
n•
Sele
ctio
n of
oth
erpe
rson
s to
prov
ide
inve
stm
ent
advi
ce o
r man
agem
ent s
ervi
ces
•Se
lect
ion
of a
ccou
nt a
rran
gem
ents
(bro
kera
ge v
s. ad
viso
ry)
•W
heth
er, i
n w
hat a
mou
nt a
nd in
wha
t for
m a
nd to
w
hat d
estin
atio
n to
take
a ro
llove
r or d
istri
butio
n fr
om
a pl
an o
r IR
A
A re
com
men
datio
n as
to th
e ad
visa
bilit
y of
ac
quiri
ng, h
oldi
ng, d
ispo
sing
of o
r ex
chan
ging
secu
ritie
s or i
nves
tmen
t pr
oper
ty
The
pers
on re
pres
ents
or
ackn
owle
dges
act
ing
as a
fidu
ciar
y
The
pers
on re
nder
s adv
ice
purs
uant
to
an
agre
emen
t, ar
rang
emen
t or
unde
rsta
ndin
g (w
ritte
n or
ver
bal)
that
th
e ad
vice
is b
ased
on
the
parti
cula
r in
vest
men
t nee
ds o
f the
reci
pien
t
The
pers
on d
irect
s adv
ice
to a
spec
ific
reci
pien
t or r
ecip
ient
s reg
ardi
ng th
e ad
visa
bilit
y of
a p
artic
ular
inve
stm
ent
or m
anag
emen
t dec
isio
n w
ith re
spec
t to
secu
ritie
s of o
ther
inve
stm
ent
prop
erty
of t
he p
lan
or IR
A
OR
OR
TOA
Pla
n, p
lan
fiduc
iary
, pl
an p
artic
ipan
t or
bene
ficia
ry, I
RA
or
IRA
ow
ner
A fe
e or
oth
er
com
pens
atio
n (d
irect
or
indi
rect
)
FOR
IF
OR OR
1-328
© Practising Law Institute
Def
initi
on o
f Fid
ucia
ry u
nder
Fin
al R
ule
(con
t.)
Wha
t is
cons
ider
ed a
reco
mm
enda
tion
-prin
cipl
es fo
r eva
luat
ing
a po
tent
ial
reco
mm
enda
tion
Con
tent
, Con
text
and
Pre
sent
atio
n–
com
mun
icat
ion
that
is re
ason
ably
vie
wed
as
a su
gges
tion
to e
ngag
e in
or r
efra
in fr
om ta
king
a p
artic
ular
cou
rse
of a
ctio
nFa
cts
and
circ
umst
ance
s de
term
inat
ion
Sta
ndar
d is
inte
nded
to b
e ob
ject
ive,
not
sub
ject
ive
Indi
vidu
al ta
ilorin
g su
gges
ts a
reco
mm
enda
tion
Ser
ies
of a
ctio
ns in
the
aggr
egat
e co
uld
lead
to a
reco
mm
enda
tion
Exa
mpl
es o
f com
mun
icat
ions
that
wou
ld n
otbe
a re
com
men
datio
n•
Non
-indi
vidu
aliz
ed p
latfo
rms
offe
red
to p
artic
ipan
t-dire
cted
ER
ISA
plan
s, if
cer
tain
co
nditi
ons
met
•
Sel
ectio
n an
d m
onito
ring
incl
udin
g R
FP re
spon
se s
ampl
e lin
e-up
s if
certa
in c
ondi
tions
m
et
•C
erta
in ty
pes
of g
ener
al c
omm
unic
atio
ns th
at a
reas
onab
le p
erso
n w
ould
not
vie
w a
s an
in
vest
men
t rec
omm
enda
tion
•In
vest
men
t edu
catio
n –
perm
its e
duca
tion
sim
ilar t
o th
at c
urre
ntly
allo
wed
, but
pop
ulat
ing
asse
t allo
catio
n m
odel
s or
inte
ract
ive
mat
eria
ls w
ith s
peci
fic in
vest
men
t alte
rnat
ives
not
pe
rmitt
ed fo
r IR
As
11
1-329
© Practising Law Institute
Exc
eptio
ns to
the
Def
initi
on o
f “In
vest
men
t Adv
ice”
1212
1-330
© Practising Law Institute
Tran
sact
ions
with
Inde
pend
ent P
lan
Fidu
ciar
ies
with
Fin
anci
al
Exp
ertis
e (“
Inde
pend
ent F
iduc
iary
Exc
eptio
n”)
Adv
ice
in c
onne
ctio
n w
ith a
n ar
m’s
-leng
th s
ale,
pur
chas
e, lo
an, e
xcha
nge
or
othe
r tra
nsac
tion
rela
ted
to th
e in
vest
men
t of s
ecur
ities
or o
ther
pro
perty
, w
here
the
plan
is re
pres
ente
d by
:A
Ban
k, In
sura
nce
Com
pany
, RIA
or B
roke
r/Dea
ler;
orA
fiduc
iary
with
cus
tody
, man
agem
ent o
r con
trol o
f ass
ets
of a
t lea
st $
50 m
illion
Mus
t obt
ain
repr
esen
tatio
ns o
r for
m a
reas
onab
le b
elie
f tha
t cou
nter
party
is
a fid
ucia
ry to
the
plan
or I
RA
, cap
able
of e
valu
atin
g in
vest
men
t ris
ks, a
nd is
re
spon
sibl
e fo
r exe
rcis
ing
inde
pend
ent j
udgm
ent
Mus
t inf
orm
cou
nter
party
you
are
not
und
erta
king
to p
rovi
de im
parti
al a
dvic
e or
adv
ice
in a
fidu
ciar
y ca
paci
ty A
ND
of t
he e
xist
ence
and
nat
ure
of th
e se
ller’s
fina
ncia
l int
eres
ts in
the
trans
actio
nC
anno
t rec
eive
dire
ct c
ompe
nsat
ion
from
the
plan
, pla
n fid
ucia
ry, p
lan
parti
cipa
nts
or b
enef
icia
ries,
IRA
or IR
A ow
ner f
or p
rovi
ding
inve
stm
ent
advi
ce in
con
nect
ion
with
the
trans
actio
n
13
1-331
© Practising Law Institute
Inde
pend
ent F
iduc
iary
Exc
eptio
n –
Issu
es W
hen
Dea
ling
with
P
lan
Spo
nsor
or I
nves
tmen
t Com
mitt
ee
$50
milli
on te
stIt
is p
ossi
ble
to a
ggre
gate
the
asse
ts fr
om d
iffer
ent p
lans
ove
r whi
ch th
e in
depe
nden
t fid
ucia
ry h
as d
iscr
etio
n or
con
trol t
o re
ach
$50
mill
ion
It is
pos
sibl
e to
agg
rega
te p
lan
asse
ts w
ith n
on-p
lan
corp
orat
e as
sets
in c
erta
in
circ
umst
ance
sFi
nanc
ial e
xper
tise
of in
depe
nden
t fid
ucia
ryH
ow to
form
a re
ason
able
bel
ief a
s to
fina
ncia
l exp
ertis
e (e
.g.,
know
ledg
e th
roug
h pr
ior c
ours
e of
dea
ling,
edu
catio
nal b
ackg
roun
d, jo
b ro
le?)
C
an a
repr
esen
tatio
n be
obt
aine
d th
roug
h ne
gativ
e co
nsen
t?Is
the
selle
r “in
depe
nden
t” of
the
inte
rmed
iary
?Th
e fin
al ru
le d
oes
not d
efin
e “in
depe
nden
t”Th
e pr
eam
ble
to th
e fin
al ru
le (a
nd F
AQ
28,
Par
t II)
requ
ires
an e
xam
inat
ion
of fi
nanc
ial
inte
rest
s (e
.g.,
fees
and
com
pens
atio
n), o
wne
rshi
p in
tere
sts,
or o
ther
rela
tions
hip,
ag
reem
ent o
r und
erst
andi
ng th
at w
ould
lim
it th
e in
term
edia
ry’s
abi
lity
to c
arry
out
its
fiduc
iary
resp
onsi
bilit
y to
any
of i
ts re
tirem
ent i
nves
tor c
lient
s.
14
1-332
© Practising Law Institute
Oth
er E
xcep
tions
Sw
ap a
nd S
ecur
ity-B
ased
Sw
ap T
rans
actio
nsA
dvic
e is
exe
mpt
, if t
he s
wap
is c
over
ed u
nder
the
Com
mod
ity E
xcha
nge
Act
or
the
Sec
uriti
es E
xcha
nge
Act
Pla
n is
repr
esen
ted
by a
n in
depe
nden
t fid
ucia
ryS
wap
dea
ler i
s no
t act
ing
as a
n ad
vise
r und
er D
odd-
Fran
k to
the
plan
Em
ploy
ees
of P
lan
Spo
nsor
sR
ule
exem
pts
advi
ce fr
om H
R, p
ayro
ll an
d ot
her e
mpl
oyee
s of
a p
lan
spon
sor
The
empl
oyee
can
not r
ecei
ve a
ny s
peci
al c
ompe
nsat
ion
in c
onne
ctio
n w
ith th
e ad
vice
15
1-333
© Practising Law Institute
Pro
hibi
ted
Tran
sact
ion
Exe
mpt
ions
(new
and
am
ende
d)
1616
1-334
© Practising Law Institute
New
Pro
hibi
ted
Tran
sact
ion
Exe
mpt
ions
-In
trodu
ctio
n
The
final
rule
pro
vide
s tw
o ne
w P
rohi
bite
d Tr
ansa
ctio
n E
xem
ptio
ns
The
Bes
t Int
eres
t Con
tract
Exe
mpt
ion
Th
e P
rinci
pal T
rans
actio
n E
xem
ptio
n
The
prim
ary
purp
ose
of th
e B
IC E
xem
ptio
n is
to p
erm
it tra
nsac
tions
that
oth
erw
ise
wou
ld b
e pr
ohib
ited
on th
e ba
sis
of c
onfli
ct o
f int
eres
t whe
n a
fiduc
iary
adv
iser
re
ceiv
es c
ompe
nsat
ion
as a
resu
lt of
the
fiduc
iary
adv
iser
’s a
dvic
e to
a p
lan
parti
cipa
nt o
r IR
A in
vest
or.
The
BIC
Exe
mpt
ion
perm
its s
uch
paym
ents
(e.g
., co
mm
issi
ons,
12b
-1 fe
es a
nd re
venu
e sh
arin
g to
the
finan
cial
inst
itutio
n), p
rovi
ded
th
e fid
ucia
ry a
dvis
er s
atis
fies
certa
in re
quire
men
ts, w
hich
are
des
igne
d to
redu
ce th
e ris
k of
the
fiduc
iary
adv
iser
pro
vidi
ng c
onfli
cted
adv
ice
The
prim
ary
purp
ose
of th
e P
TE E
xem
ptio
n is
to p
erm
it pr
inci
pal a
nd ri
skle
ss
prin
cipa
l tra
nsac
tions
bet
wee
n a
fiduc
iary
adv
iser
or f
inan
cial
inst
itutio
n an
d a
plan
or
IRA
, with
resp
ect t
o pr
inci
pal t
rade
d as
sets
(i.e
., ce
rtain
deb
t sec
uriti
es, C
Ds
and
unit
inve
stm
ent t
rust
s), p
rovi
ded
that
the
fiduc
iary
adv
iser
and
inst
itutio
n sa
tisfy
cer
tain
re
quire
men
ts
17
1-335
© Practising Law Institute
Bes
t Int
eres
t Con
tract
Exe
mpt
ion
(BIC
)
Appl
ies
to “R
etire
men
t Inv
esto
rs” (
plan
par
ticip
ants
and
ben
efic
iarie
s, IR
A ow
ners
and
“ret
ail
fiduc
iarie
s” (n
ot a
ban
k, R
IA, i
nsur
ance
com
pany
, bro
ker/d
eale
r or f
iduc
iary
that
hol
ds o
r has
un
der m
anag
emen
t or c
ontro
l tot
al a
sset
s of
$50
milli
on o
r mor
e)Th
e B
IC E
xem
ptio
n is
ava
ilabl
e to
fidu
ciar
y ad
vise
rs w
ho:
Rec
eive
var
iabl
e co
mpe
nsat
ion
Eng
age
in R
iskl
ess
Prin
cipa
l Tra
nsac
tions
Adv
ise
IRA
and
Pla
n cl
ient
s to
ent
er in
to le
vel f
ee a
dvis
ory
arra
ngem
ents
The
BIC
Exe
mpt
ion
is n
ot a
vaila
ble
to fi
duci
ary
advi
sers
/fina
ncia
l ins
titut
ions
who
:
Als
o ha
ve d
iscr
etio
nary
aut
horit
y or
con
trol w
ith re
spec
t to
the
trans
actio
n
Are
invo
lved
(eve
n vi
a an
affi
liate
) in
a pr
inci
pal t
rans
actio
n w
ith th
e P
lan
Pro
vide
cer
tain
type
s of
“rob
o” a
dvic
e
Are
the
empl
oyer
-spo
nsor
, nam
ed fi
duci
ary
or p
lan
adm
inis
trato
r and
wer
e se
lect
ed to
pr
ovid
e ad
vice
by
a fid
ucia
ry th
at is
not
inde
pend
ent f
rom
the
Adv
iser
, Fin
anci
al In
stitu
tion
or th
eir a
ffilia
tes
Are
con
duct
ing
trans
actio
ns w
ith n
on-re
tail
coun
terp
artie
s
18
1-336
© Practising Law Institute
BIC
Exe
mpt
ion
-Con
ditio
ns fo
r Rel
ief
Ack
now
ledg
e fid
ucia
ry s
tatu
sW
ritte
n co
ntra
ct fo
r IR
As
(but
not
ER
ISA
plan
s)M
ust b
e en
tere
d in
to p
rior t
o or
con
tem
pora
neou
sly
to e
xecu
tion
of re
com
men
ded
trans
actio
nM
ay u
se n
egat
ive
cons
ent (
30 d
ays
wai
t) un
til J
an. 1
, 201
8 to
am
end
exis
ting
IRA
sE
RIS
A pl
ans
are
requ
ired
to p
rovi
de c
erta
in w
ritte
n di
sclo
sure
s, n
ot a
writ
ten
cont
ract
May
not
con
tain
any
pro
hibi
ted
term
s (a
s se
t for
th in
the
rule
)S
tate
men
t atte
stin
g to
impa
rtial
con
duct
A
dvic
e th
at is
in th
e “b
est i
nter
est”
of th
e re
tirem
ent i
nves
tor –
a st
anda
rd s
imila
r to
ER
ISA’
s pr
uden
ce a
nd lo
yalty
requ
irem
ent
Rea
sona
ble
com
pens
atio
nN
o m
ater
ially
mis
lead
ing
stat
emen
tsW
arra
ntie
s by
the
finan
cial
inst
itutio
n pe
rtain
ing
to p
olic
es a
nd p
roce
dure
s,
docu
men
tatio
n of
mat
eria
l con
flict
s, n
o co
mpe
nsat
ion
stru
ctur
es th
at e
ncou
rage
ad
vise
rs to
mak
e re
com
men
datio
ns n
ot in
the
best
inte
rest
of t
he re
tirem
ent i
nves
tor
Ext
ensi
ve R
equi
red
Dis
clos
ures
At t
ime
of re
com
men
ded
trans
actio
n, w
ebsi
te o
f fin
anci
al in
stitu
tion,
upo
n re
ques
t
19
1-337
© Practising Law Institute
BIC
Exe
mpt
ion
–B
IC L
ite
Leve
l Fee
Fid
ucia
ries
(“B
IC L
ite”)
The
only
fee
or c
ompe
nsat
ion
rece
ived
by
the
finan
cial
inst
itutio
n, a
dvis
er a
nd a
ny a
ffilia
te
for a
dvic
e or
inve
stm
ent m
anag
emen
t ser
vice
s is
a “l
evel
fee”
A le
vel f
ee is
a fe
e ba
sed
on a
fixe
d pe
rcen
tage
of t
he v
alue
of t
he a
sset
s or
a s
et fe
e
A le
vel f
ee c
anno
t var
y w
ith th
e pa
rticu
lar i
nves
tmen
t rec
omm
enda
tion
and
cann
ot b
e a
com
mis
sion
or t
rans
actio
n-ba
sed
fee
Leve
l Fee
Req
uire
men
tsC
ompl
y w
ith th
e Im
parti
al C
ondu
ct S
tand
ards
Writ
ten
fiduc
iary
ack
now
ledg
men
t (al
thou
gh, e
xcep
tion
from
the
cont
ract
requ
irem
ent)
Whe
n re
com
men
ding
a ro
llove
r to
an IR
A or
sw
itch
from
a c
omm
issi
on-b
ased
acc
ount
to a
fe
e-ba
sed
acco
unt,
docu
men
t why
the
leve
l fee
arra
ngem
ent i
s in
the
best
inte
rest
of t
he
clie
nt (i
.e.,
com
ply
with
leve
l fee
pro
visi
ons
of B
IC E
xem
ptio
n)If
any
othe
r typ
es o
f fee
s ar
e re
ceiv
ed (e
.g.,
reve
nue
shar
ing,
12b
-1 fe
es o
r com
mis
sion
s)
“full
BIC
” mus
t be
used
inst
ead
Res
trict
ions
on
prod
ucts
that
may
be
offe
red
(no
prop
rieta
ry o
r pro
duct
s th
at w
ould
ge
nera
te th
ird-p
arty
pay
men
ts)
20
1-338
© Practising Law Institute
BIC
Exe
mpt
ion
–B
IC P
lus
Pro
prie
tary
Pro
duct
s (“
BIC
Plu
s”)
App
lies
whe
re fi
rm re
stric
ts fi
duci
ary
advi
ser’s
reco
mm
enda
tions
to p
ropr
ieta
ry p
rodu
cts
or
that
gen
erat
e th
ird-p
arty
pay
men
tsP
rodu
cts
that
are
man
aged
, iss
ued
or s
pons
ored
by
the
finan
cial
inst
itutio
n or
its
affil
iate
sFi
rm m
ust d
ocum
ent l
imita
tions
on
inve
stm
ent r
ecom
men
datio
n, c
oncl
ude
that
co
mpe
nsat
ion
will
still
be re
ason
able
, and
that
lim
itatio
ns w
ill no
t cau
se im
prud
ent
reco
mm
enda
tions
Sim
ilarly
, the
fina
l rul
es p
urpo
rt to
per
mit
serv
ice
prov
ider
s to
reco
mm
end
an a
dvis
ory
serv
ice
(e.g
., A
UM
acc
ount
s or
fund
s) fo
r a p
lan
or IR
A, b
ut d
oing
so
will
only
be
perm
itted
w
hen
the
AU
M fe
e or
fund
is “d
emon
stra
bly
pref
erab
le” f
or th
e pl
an o
r IR
AG
rand
fath
ered
acc
ount
s P
rovi
des
relie
f for
the
rece
ipt o
f com
pens
atio
n by
the
fiduc
iary
adv
iser
as
a re
sult
of
inve
stm
ent a
dvic
e pr
ovid
ed to
a p
lan
in c
onne
ctio
n w
ith th
e pu
rcha
se, s
ale
or e
xcha
nge
of
inve
stm
ent p
rope
rtyIn
vest
men
t pro
perty
mus
t hav
e be
en a
cqui
red
prio
r to
Apr
il 10
, 201
7Th
e tra
nsac
tion
was
oth
erw
ise
exem
pt o
n th
e da
y it
occu
rred
21
1-339
© Practising Law Institute
BIC
Exe
mpt
ion
–D
OL
FAQ
cla
rific
atio
n (O
ctob
er 2
016)
Com
pens
atio
n un
der t
he B
IC E
xem
ptio
n, s
uch
as q
uota
s, a
ppra
isal
s, b
onus
es, s
peci
al a
war
ds,
cann
ot b
e us
ed if
they
are
reas
onab
ly e
xpec
ted
to c
ause
adv
iser
s to
mak
e re
com
men
datio
ns
that
are
not
in th
e be
st in
tere
st o
f the
retir
emen
t inv
esto
rTh
is li
mita
tion
does
not
, cat
egor
ical
ly, p
recl
ude
the
use
of e
scal
atin
g gr
ids
that
are
vol
ume-
base
d, b
ut c
erta
in fa
ctor
s m
ust b
e co
nsid
ered
and
a d
eter
min
atio
n m
ust b
e m
ade
that
the
grid
s do
not
run
coun
ter t
o th
e fu
ndam
enta
l obl
igat
ion
to p
rovi
de a
dvic
e th
at is
in th
e cu
stom
er’s
bes
t in
tere
stFa
ctor
s to
con
side
r inc
lude
:Av
oidi
ng p
assi
ng a
long
a fi
rm-le
vel c
onfli
ct (e
.g.,
if fir
m re
ceiv
es h
ighe
r com
mis
sion
s fo
r se
lling
certa
in m
utua
l fun
ds, g
rid c
anno
t pay
the
advi
ser m
ore
for s
ellin
g sh
ares
of t
he
fund
s th
at p
ay th
e hi
gher
com
mis
sion
s th
an it
doe
s fo
r sel
ling
shar
es o
f the
fund
s th
at p
ay
low
er c
omm
issi
ons)
But
OK
to d
efin
e “c
ompe
nsab
le” r
even
ue th
at g
oes
into
the
grid
in s
uch
a w
ay th
at it
is
leve
l with
in d
iffer
ent b
road
cat
egor
ies
of in
vest
men
ts b
ased
on
neut
ral f
acto
rs th
at a
ren’
t tie
d to
how
lucr
ativ
e th
e in
vest
men
ts a
re fo
r the
firm
Avoi
ding
hav
ing
non-
neut
ral f
acto
rs (i
.e.,
thos
e ba
sed
on th
e fin
anci
al in
tere
sts
of th
e fir
m)
dete
rmin
e th
e di
ffere
nt c
ateg
orie
s of
inve
stm
ents
upo
n w
hich
com
pens
atio
n is
bas
edN
eutra
l fac
tors
, suc
h as
tim
e an
d co
mpl
exity
ass
ocia
ted
with
reco
mm
endi
ng
inve
stm
ents
with
in d
iffer
ent p
rodu
ct c
ateg
orie
s ar
e pe
rmitt
ed
22
1-340
© Practising Law Institute
BIC
Exe
mpt
ion
–D
OL
FAQ
cla
rific
atio
n (O
ctob
er 2
016)
Grid
s w
ith g
radu
al in
crea
ses
are
less
like
ly to
cre
ate
impe
rmis
sibl
e in
cent
ives
than
grid
s ch
arac
teriz
ed b
y la
rge
incr
ease
sAv
oid
retro
activ
ity –
new
rate
on
grid
sho
uld
appl
y on
ly to
new
inve
stm
ents
mad
e on
ce th
e th
resh
old
is re
ache
dA
dequ
ate
over
sigh
t of r
ecom
men
datio
ns w
hen
esca
latin
g gr
ids
are
in p
lace
and
adv
iser
is
appr
oach
ing
a th
resh
old
Rec
ruitm
ent B
onus
esS
ign-
on a
war
ds o
r bon
uses
not
tied
to th
e m
ovem
ent o
f acc
ount
s or
ass
ets
to th
e fir
m a
re
perm
issi
ble
unde
r the
full
BIC
Exe
mpt
ion
Bac
k-en
d aw
ards
that
are
tied
to th
e ad
vise
r’s s
atis
fact
ion
of re
venu
e or
ass
et ta
rget
s sh
ould
be
avoi
ded
on a
goi
ng-fo
rwar
d ba
sis.
OK
for f
irms
to h
onor
pre
-exi
stin
g ob
ligat
ions
(as
of O
ctob
er
27, 2
016)
that
are
reas
onab
le a
nd m
onito
red
purs
uant
to c
usto
miz
ed p
olic
ies
and
proc
edur
es
Rob
o-A
dvic
eTh
e fu
ll B
IC E
xem
ptio
n do
es n
ot c
over
adv
ice
prov
ided
sol
ely
thro
ugh
an in
tera
ctiv
e w
eb s
ite in
w
hich
com
pute
r sof
twar
e-ba
sed
mod
els
or a
pplic
atio
ns p
rovi
de re
com
men
datio
ns b
ased
on
pers
onal
info
rmat
ion
that
the
inve
stor
sup
plie
s w
ithou
t any
per
sona
l int
erac
tion
or a
dvic
e fro
m a
n in
divi
dual
adv
iser
(i.e
., ro
bo-a
dvic
e)
BIC
Exe
mpt
ion
is a
vaila
ble
for r
obo-
advi
ce p
rovi
ders
that
are
“lev
el fe
e fid
ucia
ries”
23
1-341
© Practising Law Institute
BIC
Exe
mpt
ion
–D
OL
FAQ
cla
rific
atio
n (O
ctob
er 2
016)
Leve
l Fee
Fid
ucia
ries
–FA
Q C
larif
icat
ion
Can
rely
on
BIC
Lite
eve
n if
the
finan
cial
inst
itutio
n of
fers
bot
h le
vel f
ee a
dvis
ory
serv
ices
an
d co
mm
issi
on-b
ased
bro
kera
ge a
ccou
nts
for w
hich
relia
nce
on fu
ll B
IC E
xem
ptio
n w
ould
be
requ
ired
BIC
Lite
is a
vaila
ble
even
if, a
fter r
ollo
ver,
IRA
will
be m
anag
ed o
n a
disc
retio
nary
bas
is, a
s lo
ng a
s ad
vise
r doe
s no
t hav
e di
scre
tion
with
resp
ect t
o th
e de
cisi
on to
roll
over
ass
ets
to
the
IRA
OK
to re
ly o
n B
IC L
ite if
fidu
ciar
y in
vest
men
t adv
ice
incl
udes
reco
mm
enda
tion
to tr
ansf
er
from
a c
omm
issi
on-b
ased
acc
ount
to a
fee-
base
d ac
coun
tC
anno
t rel
y on
BIC
Lite
if a
dvis
er w
ill re
ceiv
e th
ird-p
arty
pay
men
ts s
uch
as 1
2b-1
fees
an
d re
venu
e sh
arin
g pa
ymen
ts b
ecau
se th
ey a
re p
aid
only
for p
artic
ular
inve
stm
ents
that
ar
e in
clud
ed in
the
arra
ngem
ent
Can
not r
ely
on B
IC L
ite fo
r com
mis
sion
or t
rans
actio
n-ba
sed
com
pens
atio
n ar
rang
emen
ts,
or fo
r com
pens
atio
n st
ruct
ures
that
are
lim
ited
to th
e sa
le o
f pro
prie
tary
pro
duct
s be
caus
e th
e av
aila
bilit
y of
the
com
pens
atio
n de
pend
s on
the
reco
mm
enda
tion
of a
pro
duct
and
th
eref
ore
is n
ot le
vel
24
1-342
© Practising Law Institute
Prin
cipa
l Tra
nsac
tion
Exe
mpt
ion
Prin
cipa
l Tra
nsac
tion
Exe
mpt
ion
The
Prin
cipa
l Tra
nsac
tion
Exe
mpt
ion
perm
its fi
nanc
ial i
nstit
utio
ns to
pur
chas
e or
sel
l ce
rtain
ass
ets
in “p
rinci
pal t
rans
actio
ns” o
r “ris
kles
s pr
inci
pal t
rans
actio
ns” w
ith p
lans
, pla
n ac
coun
ts o
r IR
As
and
rece
ive
mar
k-up
s, m
ark-
dow
ns o
r sim
ilar p
aym
ents
Prin
cipa
l tra
ded
asse
ts a
re (i
) a d
ebt s
ecur
ity, (
ii) C
D, (
iii) in
tere
sts
in a
Uni
t Inv
estm
ent
Trus
t, or
(iv)
an
inve
stm
ent p
erm
itted
pur
suan
t to
an in
divi
dual
exe
mpt
ion
gran
ted
by th
e D
OL
“Impa
rtial
con
duct
” sta
ndar
ds a
nd d
iscl
osur
e re
quire
men
tsD
oes
not a
llow
sal
es to
pla
ns o
r IR
As
of s
ecur
ities
in a
n un
derw
ritin
g in
whi
ch th
e fin
anci
al
inst
itutio
n is
a s
elle
r of s
ecur
ities
issu
ed b
y th
e fin
anci
al in
stitu
tion
At t
he ti
me
of th
e tra
nsac
tion,
the
secu
rity
bein
g pu
rcha
sed
poss
esse
s no
gre
ater
than
m
oder
ate
cred
it ris
k, a
ndS
uffic
ient
ly li
quid
that
the
secu
rity
can
be s
old
at o
r nea
r its
car
ryin
g va
lue
Dis
clos
ure
requ
irem
ents
Con
firm
sA
nnua
l dis
clos
ure
(or u
pon
requ
est)
Pre
-tran
sact
ion
disc
losu
re
25
1-343
© Practising Law Institute
Pro
hibi
ted
Tran
sact
ion
Exe
mpt
ion
84-2
4
Sig
nific
antly
nar
row
ed th
e sc
ope
of re
lief
Rec
eipt
of c
omm
issi
ons
on fi
xed-
rate
ann
uity
con
tract
s (IR
As
and
plan
s)R
ecei
pt o
f mut
ual f
und
com
mis
sion
s (p
lans
)C
omm
issi
on is
nar
row
ly d
efin
edM
ust u
se B
est I
nter
est C
ontra
ct E
xem
ptio
n to
rece
ive
com
mis
sion
s on
va
riabl
e or
fixe
d in
dexe
d an
nuiti
es
26
1-344
© Practising Law Institute
Oth
er C
lass
Exe
mpt
ions
Pro
hibi
ted
Tran
sact
ion
Exe
mpt
ion
77-4
Cov
ers
rece
ipt o
f com
pens
atio
n fro
m a
ffilia
ted
mut
ual f
unds
Am
ende
d to
inco
rpor
ate
Impa
rtial
Con
duct
Sta
ndar
ds fo
r IR
A fid
ucia
ries
Pro
hibi
ted
Tran
sact
ion
Exe
mpt
ion
86-1
28C
over
s pa
ymen
t of c
ompe
nsat
ion
of a
ffilia
ted
brok
er-d
eale
rsA
men
ded
to re
mov
e re
lief f
or IR
A in
vest
men
t adv
ice
fiduc
iarie
s an
d in
corp
orat
e Im
parti
al C
ondu
ct S
tand
ards
27
1-345
© Practising Law Institute
Impl
icat
ions
for A
sset
Man
ager
s
2828
1-346
© Practising Law Institute
Type
s of
Fee
s –
Reg
iste
red
Fund
s
29
Fee
Type
12b-
1 Fe
esFr
ont-E
nd S
ales
C
harg
esS
ub-T
rans
fer
Age
ncy
Fees
Rev
enue
S
harin
g
Fund
ing
Sou
rce
Fee
Stru
ctur
e
Fee
Des
crip
tion
Fund
Ret
aine
d fro
m
Inve
stm
ent i
nto
Fund
Fund
Adv
iser
Can
var
y by
cla
ss.
An
inte
rmed
iary
may
re
bate
all
or p
art o
f th
e fe
es to
an
elig
ible
cus
tom
er
Can
var
y by
cla
ss o
r qu
alify
for a
wai
ver,
but
othe
rwis
e no
t ne
gotia
ble
As
nego
tiate
d. S
ome
fund
s m
ay h
ave
limits
on
am
ount
s th
at m
ay
be p
aid
by th
e Fu
nd
As
nego
tiate
d
•P
lan
appr
oved
(and
an
nual
ly re
appr
oved
) by
Fun
d’s
Boa
rd
•Fe
es b
ased
on
tota
l ne
t ass
ets
inve
sted
in
the
appl
icab
le s
hare
cl
ass.
12b
-1 fe
e ca
nnot
var
y w
ithin
a
shar
e cl
ass
•O
ngoi
ng e
xpen
se o
f a
Fund
•S
truct
ure/
fee
esta
blis
hed
at th
e in
cept
ion
of th
e sh
ares
cl
ass
as a
ppro
ved
by
the
Fund
Boa
rd
•C
an b
e su
bjec
t to
redu
ctio
ns o
r wai
vers
to
spe
cific
cla
sses
of
inve
stor
s as
des
crib
ed
in th
e pr
ospe
ctus
•Fe
es p
aid
as th
e re
sult
of o
mni
bus
acco
untin
g an
d ne
twor
king
ar
rang
emen
ts
•P
aym
ent s
truct
ure
acco
rdin
g to
vol
ume
of s
ub a
ccou
nts
or
disc
lose
d ac
coun
ts,
and/
or b
ased
on
tota
l ne
t ass
ets
of
inte
rmed
iary
in
vest
ed in
ap
plic
able
sha
re
clas
s
•M
ay b
e in
add
ition
to
othe
r for
ms
of
com
pens
atio
n
•M
ay b
e m
ade
for
mar
ketin
g,
dist
ribut
ion,
pr
omot
iona
l, or
sub
-tra
nsfe
r age
ncy
serv
ices
1-347
© Practising Law Institute
Impl
icat
ions
for A
sset
Man
ager
s –
Reg
iste
red
Fund
s
Ther
e w
ill li
kely
be
a va
riety
of r
espo
nses
to th
e fin
al ru
le, a
t lea
st in
itial
lyB
IC re
quire
men
ts w
ill ha
ve a
n im
pact
, dire
ct a
nd in
dire
ct, o
n as
set m
anag
ers
and
inte
rmed
iarie
s, a
nd
will
driv
e ch
ange
s in
inve
stm
ent p
rodu
cts
Impa
rtial
con
duct
sta
ndar
dFo
cus
on “b
est i
nter
est”
stan
dard
like
ly to
impa
ct n
atur
e an
d ty
pe o
f rec
omm
ende
d fu
nds
and
othe
r inv
estm
ent p
rodu
cts
and
serv
ices
, and
leve
l and
sco
pe o
f dili
genc
eP
roce
dura
l pru
denc
e re
view
whe
n in
vest
igat
ing
the
mer
its o
f a re
com
men
datio
nA
dapt
ing
to th
e ne
w d
iscl
osur
e re
quire
men
tsLi
kely
dem
and
for l
ower
-cos
t pro
duct
opt
ions
Mov
emen
t aw
ay fr
om c
lass
es th
at p
ay 1
2b-1
fees
Sha
re c
lass
ratio
naliz
atio
n fo
r ret
irem
ent i
nves
tors
Furth
er e
ncou
rage
“I c
lass
” and
“R c
lass
” sha
res
“R5”
(no
12b-
1) a
nd “R
6” (n
o fo
rm o
f int
erm
edia
ry c
ompe
nsat
ion:
12b
-1 o
r sub
-TA
)C
erta
in in
term
edia
ries
may
insi
st o
n in
divi
dual
ized
cla
sses
(arg
uabl
y no
t nec
essa
ry w
here
sub
-TA
fees
may
be
paid
“up
to” a
cer
tain
am
ount
-co
nsid
er w
heth
er ju
stifi
ed)
Cer
tain
inte
rmed
iarie
s m
ay c
hoos
e to
cha
rge
exte
rnal
ized
com
mis
sion
s on
“cle
an s
hare
” cla
sses
C
apita
l Gro
up N
o-A
ctio
n Le
tter (
Janu
ary
11, 2
017)
Pot
entia
l for
redu
ctio
n in
sub
-TA
fees
30
1-348
© Practising Law Institute
Impl
icat
ions
for A
sset
Man
ager
s –
Reg
iste
red
Fund
s
Dis
tribu
tion
arra
ngem
ents
and
pay
men
ts m
ay b
e re
stru
ctur
ed (e
.g.,
leve
l rev
enue
sh
arin
g ac
ross
fund
s on
a p
latfo
rm)
Con
sequ
ence
s if
inte
rmed
iarie
s of
fer f
ewer
fund
s on
thei
r pla
tform
sC
ould
per
mit
fiduc
iarie
s an
d th
eir f
irms
to b
ette
r (or
mor
e ea
sily
) com
ply
with
Impa
rtial
C
ondu
ct S
tand
ards
thro
ugh
a m
ore
man
agea
ble
dilig
ence
pro
cess
Pot
entia
l cla
ss a
ctio
n lit
igat
ion
cons
eque
nces
of f
und
conc
entra
tion
?
Fund
s th
at d
efy
com
para
bilit
y by
inde
pend
ent f
und
rese
arch
com
pani
es (i
.e.,
the
fund
isn’
t nea
tly c
ateg
oriz
ed, b
ut p
erfo
rms
wel
l giv
en it
s st
rate
gy) c
ould
stru
ggle
to
rem
ain
on in
term
edia
ries’
reco
mm
ende
d lis
tsW
hat m
etho
dolo
gy w
ill fid
ucia
ries
empl
oy to
sat
isfy
obl
igat
ions
und
er B
IC in
con
nect
ion
with
fund
sel
ectio
n ?
Use
of B
IC’s
leve
l fee
fidu
ciar
y pr
ovis
ions
Fully
ext
erna
lize
cost
s to
the
retir
emen
t inv
esto
rW
ould
requ
ire e
quiv
alen
t of “
R6”
sha
res
with
no
inte
rmed
iary
com
pens
atio
n fro
m fu
nd o
r fu
nd a
dvis
erN
o tra
nsac
tion
fees
or c
omm
issi
ons
31
1-349
© Practising Law Institute
Impl
icat
ions
for A
sset
Man
ager
s –
Reg
iste
red
Fund
s
Org
aniz
atio
nal C
onsi
dera
tions
Inte
rnal
team
s pr
epar
ed to
ana
lyze
and
add
ress
the
DO
L ru
le re
quire
men
ts
Sig
nific
ant I
T bu
ild re
quire
d to
com
ply
with
exp
ecte
d de
man
ds o
f int
erm
edia
ries
Rev
iew
fund
mat
eria
ls (r
egis
tratio
n st
atem
ent,
web
site
, inv
esto
r com
mun
icat
ions
) and
ag
reem
ents
for c
onsi
sten
cy a
nd c
ompl
ianc
e w
ith th
e ru
le
Trai
ning
for s
ales
team
s to
bet
ter u
nder
stan
d im
pact
of t
he ru
les
Cal
l cen
ter s
uppo
rt -s
epar
ate
call
cent
er fo
r IR
A cl
ient
s, c
aref
ully
scr
ipte
d re
spon
ses
to
retir
emen
t inv
esto
rs
Con
tinua
tion
of o
mni
bus
mod
el v
s. u
se o
f fun
d’s
trans
fer a
gent
May
resu
lt in
fees
pai
d di
rect
ly b
y pl
an o
r IR
A vs
. out
of f
unds
Con
verg
ence
of s
tand
ards
and
dis
clos
ures
for r
etire
men
t inv
estm
ent a
ccou
nts
and
non-
retir
emen
t acc
ount
s –
impa
ct o
n cl
ient
exp
erie
nce
32
1-350
© Practising Law Institute
Impl
icat
ions
for A
sset
Man
ager
s –
Reg
iste
red
Fund
s
Ext
erna
lizin
g co
mm
issi
ons
and
appl
icab
ility
of S
ectio
n 22
(d) o
f the
194
0 A
ct
Sec
tion
22(d
) and
Rul
e 22
d-1
appl
y w
hen
an in
term
edia
ry is
act
ing
as a
dea
ler b
ut n
ot w
hen
the
inte
rmed
iary
is
actin
g as
a b
roke
r
His
toric
ally,
som
e se
lling
agr
eem
ents
bet
wee
n fu
nd a
nd in
term
edia
ry p
rovi
de th
at in
term
edia
ry is
act
ing
as a
dea
ler
Suc
h ag
reem
ents
wou
ld h
ave
to b
e am
ende
d to
mak
e cl
ear i
nter
med
iary
is a
ctin
g as
a b
roke
r
Sch
wab
and
LP
L no
-act
ion
lette
rs p
rovi
de s
ome
guid
ance
on
whe
n an
inte
rmed
iary
is a
ctin
g as
a b
roke
r.
Rec
ent C
apita
l Gro
up N
o-A
ctio
n Le
tter p
erm
its e
xter
naliz
ed c
omm
issi
ons
on c
lean
sha
re c
lass
es (n
o fro
nt-e
nd
sale
s lo
ad, d
efer
red
sale
s ch
arge
s or
oth
er a
sset
-bas
ed fe
e fo
r sal
es o
r dis
tribu
tion)
Fron
t-end
load
wai
ver m
ust b
e di
sclo
sed
in th
e fu
nd’s
pro
spec
tus
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith S
ectio
n 22
(d) o
f the
194
0
Act
and
Rul
e 22
d-1
ther
eund
er
All
inte
rmed
iary
-spe
cific
sal
es lo
ad w
aive
rs m
ust b
e di
sclo
sed
in th
e pr
ospe
ctus
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith R
ule
22d-
1
Rec
ent S
EC
gui
danc
e pe
rmits
use
of a
n ap
pend
ix to
the
pros
pect
us fo
r pur
pose
s of
dis
clos
ing
inte
rmed
iary
-
spec
ific
sale
s lo
ad v
aria
tions
(IM
Gui
danc
e U
pdat
e N
o. 2
016-
06)
Sha
re c
lass
exc
hang
es
Inte
rmed
iarie
s co
nsid
erin
g fro
nt-e
nd lo
ad w
aive
rs o
n in
term
edia
ry-im
plem
ente
d ex
chan
ges
from
Cla
ss C
shar
es to
Cla
ss A
sha
res
of th
e sa
me
fund
33
1-351
© Practising Law Institute
Impl
icat
ions
for A
sset
Man
ager
s –
Priv
ate
Fund
s
For m
anag
ers
of h
edge
fund
s, p
rivat
e eq
uity
fund
s an
d ot
her p
rivat
e fu
nds,
the
prim
ary
conc
ern
is w
heth
er m
arke
ting
one’
s ow
n fu
nds
and
inve
stm
ent m
anag
emen
t se
rvic
es c
ould
be
cons
ider
ed to
invo
lve
the
prov
isio
n of
inve
stm
ent a
dvic
e, m
akin
g th
e m
anag
er a
fidu
ciar
yC
onun
drum
–th
e m
anag
er w
ould
then
be
unab
le to
act
in it
s ow
n in
tere
st in
mar
ketin
g its
pro
duct
s or
eve
n ne
gotia
ting
its o
wn
fees
, reg
ardl
ess
of w
heth
er th
e pr
ivat
e fu
nd
hold
s “p
lan
asse
ts”
Man
ager
’s fi
nanc
ial i
nter
est i
n ea
rnin
g fe
e-ba
sed
com
pens
atio
n fro
m th
e he
dge
fund
or P
E fu
nd u
pon
bein
g en
gage
d re
sults
in a
con
flict
that
wou
ld it
self
requ
ire
exem
ptiv
e re
lief
Pla
cem
ent a
gent
s –
pres
umab
ly a
re th
e ag
ents
of th
e fu
nd m
anag
er, a
nd m
ay m
ake
the
fund
man
ager
a fi
duci
ary
thro
ugh
thei
r sal
es a
ctiv
ityO
pen
ques
tion:
Are
pla
cem
ent a
gent
s fid
ucia
ries
or is
the
“gen
eral
co
mm
unic
atio
ns” e
xclu
sion
ava
ilabl
e to
them
in th
e ab
senc
e of
the
Inde
pend
ent
Fidu
ciar
y E
xcep
tion?
Fina
ncia
l ins
titut
ions
that
pro
vide
“pla
tform
” of h
edge
and
PE
and
oth
er p
rivat
e fu
nds
–ho
w c
an th
e cu
rren
t com
pens
atio
n st
ruct
ures
be
adap
ted?
34
1-352
© Practising Law Institute
Impl
icat
ions
for A
sset
Man
ager
s –
Priv
ate
Fund
s
Use
the
Inde
pend
ent F
iduc
iary
Exc
eptio
n fo
r pla
ns re
pres
ente
d by
sop
hist
icat
ed
inde
pend
ent f
iduc
iarie
s:
Rec
omm
enda
tions
to m
ost E
RIS
A pl
ans
inve
stin
g in
hed
ge fu
nds
or p
rivat
e eq
uity
fund
s sh
ould
be
cove
red
Blu
eprin
t in
the
final
regu
latio
ns -
new
set
of w
ritte
n re
pres
enta
tions
in s
ubsc
riptio
n do
cum
ents
IRA
s ar
e a
diffe
rent
mat
ter:
Mos
t IR
As,
eve
n la
rge
ones
, are
not
repr
esen
ted
by a
n in
depe
nden
t inv
estm
ent
prof
essi
onal
, mak
ing
the
selle
r’s e
xcep
tion
unav
aila
ble
(IRA
owne
r won
’t qu
alify
)W
hile
alte
rnat
ive
inve
stm
ents
cou
ld b
e of
fere
d un
der t
he B
IC E
xem
ptio
n, th
e co
nditi
ons
of
that
exe
mpt
ion
are
impr
actic
al in
the
priv
ate
inve
stm
ent f
und
cont
ext
Pos
sibl
e ap
proa
ches
, sho
rt of
the
BIC
:A
ccep
t onl
y IR
As
that
can
sho
w th
ey a
re a
dvis
ed b
y a
qual
ifyin
g in
depe
nden
t fid
ucia
ry –
grow
th o
f a n
ew c
lass
of a
dvis
ers?
Acc
ept o
nly
IRA
s if
ther
e ar
e no
com
mun
icat
ions
with
the
owne
r oth
er th
an th
e pr
ovis
ion
of o
fferin
g do
cum
ents
–no
“rec
omm
enda
tions
” -lik
ely
not f
easi
ble
Exc
lude
IRA
s, o
ther
than
thos
e of
prin
cipa
ls a
nd e
mpl
oyee
s of
the
man
ager
35
1-353
© Practising Law Institute
Impl
emen
tatio
n D
ates
3636
1-354
© Practising Law Institute
Tim
ing
for I
mpl
emen
tatio
n of
the
Fina
l Rul
e an
d E
xem
ptio
nsTh
e fin
al fi
duci
ary
rule
is e
ffect
ive
June
7, 2
016,
and
will
beco
me
appl
icab
le
for t
rans
actio
ns b
egin
ning
Apr
il 10
, 201
7Th
e B
IC E
xem
ptio
n an
d P
rinci
pal T
rans
actio
n E
xem
ptio
n ar
e al
so a
pplic
able
fo
r tra
nsac
tions
beg
inni
ng A
pril
10, 2
017
Dur
ing
the
perio
d A
pril
10, 2
017
to J
anua
ry 1
, 201
8, fi
nanc
ial i
nstit
utio
ns a
nd
advi
sers
mus
t:A
dher
e to
the
“Impa
rtial
Con
duct
” sta
ndar
ds
Pro
vide
not
ice
that
ack
now
ledg
es fi
duci
ary
stat
us a
nd d
escr
ibes
mat
eria
l con
flict
s D
esig
nate
a m
onito
r for
com
plia
nce
with
con
flict
of i
nter
est a
nd im
parti
al c
ondu
ct
issu
esA
ll ot
her c
ondi
tions
of t
he e
xem
ptio
ns w
ill ap
ply
in J
anua
ry 2
018
37
1-355
© Practising Law Institute
Rec
ent J
udic
ial A
ffirm
atio
n of
the
Rul
e
3838
1-356
© Practising Law Institute
Rec
ent J
udic
ial A
ffirm
atio
n of
the
Rul
e
On
Nov
embe
r 4, 2
016,
the
U.S
. Dis
trict
Cou
rt fo
r the
Dis
trict
of C
olum
bia
uphe
ld th
e Fi
nal R
egul
atio
ns in
an
actio
n br
ough
t by
the
Nat
iona
l Ass
ocia
tion
of F
ixed
Ann
uitie
s (N
AFA
) und
er th
e A
dmin
istra
tive
Pro
cedu
res
Act
and
the
Reg
ulat
ory
Flex
ibilit
y A
ct,
hold
ing
that
the
DO
L fo
llow
ed th
e ne
cess
ary
proc
edur
es a
nd d
id n
ot e
xcee
d its
au
thor
ity in
issu
ing
the
rule
On
Nov
embe
r 28,
201
6, th
e U
.S. D
istri
ct C
ourt
for t
he D
istri
ct o
f Kan
sas
uphe
ld
the
final
rule
on
sim
ilar g
roun
dsS
epar
atel
y, th
e U
.S. D
istri
ct C
ourt
for t
he N
orth
ern
Dis
trict
of T
exas
hea
rd o
ral
argu
men
ts o
n N
ovem
ber 1
7, 2
016
from
bot
h th
e D
OL
and
coun
sel t
o ni
ne p
lain
tiffs
in
thre
e la
wsu
its c
halle
ngin
g th
e fin
al ru
le
Som
e ex
perts
bel
ieve
that
the
case
cou
ld h
inge
on
Firs
t Am
endm
ent g
roun
ds
39
1-357
© Practising Law Institute
Em
ergi
ng Is
sues
and
Tre
nds
4040
1-358
© Practising Law Institute
Em
ergi
ng Is
sues
Del
ay o
f the
fina
l rul
e (a
s of
Jan
uary
201
7)O
n Ja
nuar
y 20
, the
Whi
te H
ouse
Chi
ef o
f Sta
ff se
nt a
mem
o to
all
fede
ral
agen
cies
hal
ting
furth
er c
onsi
dera
tion
of p
endi
ng re
gula
tions
that
hav
e no
t tak
en
effe
ct.
App
licat
ion
to d
elay
the
DO
L fid
ucia
ry ru
le is
in q
uest
ion,
as
the
fiduc
iary
ru
le, w
hile
“effe
ctiv
e,” i
s no
t yet
“app
licab
le.”
Del
ay m
ay re
quire
not
ice
and
com
men
t.O
n Ja
nuar
y 6,
201
7, a
bill
was
intro
duce
d th
at w
ould
del
ay th
e fin
al ru
le fo
r tw
o ye
ars
If fin
al ru
le is
del
ayed
, con
sequ
ence
s of
bei
ng in
“lim
bo”
Avai
labi
lity
of In
depe
nden
t Fid
ucia
ry E
xcep
tion
whe
re p
rodu
ct m
anuf
actu
rer
prov
ides
mod
el p
ortfo
lio s
ervi
ces
to in
term
edia
ries
Impa
ct o
f rec
eivi
ng a
fee
or o
ther
com
pens
atio
n by
per
son
rely
ing
on th
e ex
cept
ion
(and
que
stio
n as
to w
ho is
pay
ing
the
fee)
Sha
re c
lass
issu
es (n
ew c
lass
es, T
sha
res,
exc
hang
es)
Hel
d at
fund
acc
ount
s
41
1-359
© Practising Law Institute
Que
stio
ns &
Ans
wer
s
42
1-360
© Practising Law Institute
NOTES
1-361
© Practising Law Institute
NOTES
1-362