Constant Switching Frequency Self-Oscillating Controlled ...
INVESTIGATION OF ULTRA-HIGH SWITCHING FREQUENCY TO …
Transcript of INVESTIGATION OF ULTRA-HIGH SWITCHING FREQUENCY TO …
INVESTIGATION OF ULTRA-HIGH SWITCHING FREQUENCY
TO REDUCE SIZE IN RAPID CAPACITOR CHARGING
by
BEN MORRIS, B.S.E.E., B.S.
A THESIS
IN
ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in
Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for
die Degree of
MASTER OF SCIENCE
IN
ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
Approved
May, 2004
©2004 Ben Morris
All Rights Reserved
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
1 would like to thank my committee for their support and guidance during this
project. 1 would especially like to thank Dr. Dickens who served as chairman of my
committee. I also would like to thank Dr. Giesselmann and Dr. Mankowski for their
knowledge and advice given throughout the project.
Special thanks are also owed to the staff of The Center for Pulsed Power and
Power Electronics at Texas Tech. Specifically, I would like to thank Dino Castro, Danny
Garcia, and Marie Byrd. I could not have finished without them. I would also like to
thank my colleagues in the lab who were always ready to give advice and encouragement
towards learning.
I also wish to express much gratitude to my wife, Lisa, for her encouragement,
financial and emotional support, companionship, and love.
11
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS iii
ABSTRACT v
LIST OF FIGURES vi
1. INTRODUCTION 1
2. THEORY AND DESIGN 3
2.1 Voltage Multiplier Cascade 3 2.1.1 40kV Charger Multiplier 5 2.1.2 50kV Charger Multiplier 5
2.2 Gate Driver and H-Bridge 6 2.2.1 40kV Charger H-Bridge 8 2.2.2 50kV Charger H-Bridge 10
2.3 Transformer 11 2.3.1 40kV Charger Transformer 12 2.3.2 50kV Charger Transformer 13
2.4 Optical Isolation 14 2.4.1 40kV Charger Optical Isolation 14 2.4.2 50kV Charger Optical Isolation 15
2.5 Power Supply 15 2.5.1 40kV Charger Power Supply 16 2.5.2 50kV Charger Power Supply 16
3. COMPUTER SIMULATIONS 18
3.1 Transformer Simulation 18 3.2 40kV Charger Simulation 19 3.3 50kV Charger Simulation 24
4. IMPLEMENTATION 27
4.1 Transformer Wrapping 27 4.2 Board Layout 28
4.2.1 40kV Charger Layout 28 4.2.2 50kV Charger Layout 33
111
4.3 40kV Charger Assembly 37 4.4 50kV Charger Assembly 39
5. RESULTS 41
5.1 40kV Charger Results 41 5.2 Transformer Results 52 5.3 Battery Supply 54 5.4 50kV Charger Results 56
6. CONCLUSIONS 65
REFERENCES 67
iv
ABSTRACT
This project concerned itself with two different chargers, both based on the same
principle designs but both having fundamentally different output and input requirements
and goals. Both chargers were built using a full bridge setup that was MOSFET based
utilizing frequencies of 187 kHz to 1 MHz being examined. The modulated DC voltage is
applied to a transformer and then a multiplier cascade is used to complete the final
voltage increases. The 40kV charger had a requirement of 100-300VDC input with a
40kV, 40kW, IkJ output requirement in 10ms or less. The 50kV charger required a
higher output voltage with a considerably lower input voltage requirement of 40-50VDC
and was required to operate repetitively at 200Hz. Transformer, voltage multiplier,
circuit board layouts, and battery system designs and tests are all covered.
LIST OF FIGURES
2.1: Half-wave voltage multipliers [4] 4
2.2: H-Bridge, Single Phase [2] 6
2.3: H-Bridge output [2] 7
3.1: 40kV Layout in PSpice 20
3.2: 40kV Output Simulation in 6ms 21
3.3: PSpice Layout of 2nd 40kV charger 22
3.4: 40kV simulation resuh 23
3.5: Energy calculation 23
3.6: 50kV charger schematic 24
3.7: 50kV charger simulated voltage output waveform 25
3.8: 50kV charger simulated current input waveform 25
4.1: 40kV charger schematic in PSpice 29
4.2: 40kV charger driver board layout 30
4.3: Multiplier board schematic 31
4.4: Multiplier board layout 32
4.5: 50kV Driver Board Schematic 34
4.6: 50kV Transformer and Multiplier Schematic 34
4.7: Transformer and Multiplier Layout 35
4.8: Multiplier Module Schematic 36
4.9: Multiplier Module Layout 36
vi
4.10: Driver Board and Multiplier Setup (40kV) 37
4.11: Input Capacitor Bank 38
4.12: Capacitor Load Isolated 39
4.13: Driver Board and Multiplier Setup (50kV) 40
5.1: 5V input to a 0.16pF load 42
5.2: l5Vinputto0.16|iFload 42
5.3: 20V input to 0.16pF load 43
5.4: 25V input to 0.16^F load 43
5.5: 65V input to 0.16nF load in oil 44
5.6: 75V input to 0.16nF load in oil 45
5.7: 85V input to 0.16nF load in oil 45
5.8: 95V input to 0.16nF load in oil 46
5.9: lOOV input to 0.16nF load in oil 46
5.10: lOOV input to full system, 26.5kV output 47
5.11: 1 lOV input to full system, 30kV max output 48
5.12: 20V Input, 100ms 49
5.13: 30V Input, 100ms 49
5.14: 40v Input, 100ms 50
5.15: PWM and gate driver output with noise 51
5.16: PWM and gate driver output with erratic duty cycle 51
5.17: Transformer 30V Input, 4.5kV Out 53
5.18: Transformer 40V Input, 6kV Output 53
Vll
5.19: Lithium Ion Battery Test of 2.95V at 250mQ Yielding 11.8A 54
5.20: Lead Acid Battery Test of 10.4V at \50mQ. Yielding 69A 55
5.21: lOV input, I multiplier 56
5.22: 20V input, I multiplier 57
5.23: 35V input, I multiplier 57
5.24: 35V input, transformer waveform 58
5.25: lOV input, 2 multipliers 59
5.26: 20V input, 2 multipliers 59
5.27: 35V input, 2 multipliers 60
5.28: 35V input, 2 multipliers, transformer drop 61
5.29: 25V battery input, 2 multipliers 62
5.30: 25V battery input, 3 multipliers 62
5.31: 25V battery input, 4 multipliers 63
5.32: 25V battery input, 5 multipliers 63
5.33: 25V battery input, 6 multipliers 64
viu
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
High voltage applications of pulsed power are many. Obtaining high voltages in
compact packages has been a major focus of research and industry. Transformers are
limited in size by the frequency of the input voltage, in general the higher the switching
frequency the smaller you can make your transformer. In order to reduce the transformer
size one must utilize a high switching frequency. Thyristor devices can handle
considerable currents, but limitations on their switching speed, due to having to reverse
the current to tum them off, prevent their use in rapid chargers. Insulated gate bipolar
junction transistors can handle considerable current, but the switching speed still leaves
much to be desired with a maximum switching frequency in the 30's to 40's of kHz. This
leaves MOSFET devices alone as a practical choice for higher speed switching
applications. The project itself built two different chargers, both of which used similar
modulation techniques. Both chargers were built using a full bridge setup using
MOSFETs as it allowed for a less complex transformer design compared to a push-pull or
resonant based system. A multiplier cascade is used to complete the final voltage step up
as stepping a voltage up by a factor of 2, 3, or 4 is relatively simple to do compared to
having to step up to a very high voltage on a transformer alone.
The two charger setups had different current and voltage requirements and as such
had to be designed separately. A 40kV charger with a 100-300VDC input with a 40kV,
40kW, IkJ output needed different considerations in transformer and bridge design
compared to a 50kV charger, that had a lower input voltage requirement of 40-50VDC that
was required to operate at 200Hz.
CHAPTER 2
THEORY AND DESIGN
To increase the voltage from the low value to the high value, several methods
were investigated. Using a transformer alone would be impractical due to the sheer
volume and incredible winding insulation required to prevent breakdown between
secondary coils when wrapped on the transformer core. It was determined that a
transformer could step the voltage up to moderately high voltages and then a voltage
multiplier could double or triple the voltage with little effort. Combining the multipliers
in series allowed for even higher voltages to be obtained with minimal effort.
2.1 Voltage Multiplier Cascade
Voltage multipliers are simple and effective ways of raising the output voltage
when only small output currents are needed. A Villard multiplier is the basis for the
entire device [2]. A single Villard multiplier is formed by a single diode and capacitor
forming a half wave rectifier as shown in Figure 2.1(a). Combining two identical
multipliers in series yields the Greinacher multiplier configuration shown in Figure
2.1(b). One capacitor is charged on the positive half cycle of the input voltage and the
other is charged by the negative half cycle [2]. Both capacitors are charged in parallel to
the same voltage. The output at the load has the capacitors in a series configuration and
the output voltage is double that of the input voltage.
NA=V„ SO X \ ZJ
1
For no load:
PIV = 2NA = 2Vo
<VL>=NA=VO
Vtpeok =2NA = 2Vo
(a) Villard Circuit [17]
C, D2
For no load: PIV = 2NA T
(b) Greinacher Circuit [17]
Figure 2.1: Half-wave voltage multipliers [4]
As each capacitor is charged to the input voltage, cascading multiple setups in
series with each other can yield extremely high voltages without any kind of complex
circuitry. For each Greinacher cascade, twice the input voltage is added to the output.
The expression for the output voltage is shown in equation 2.1.
V,.,=N*2*V,„ 2.1 [4]
where N is the number of Greinacher stages. Each component of the multiplier setup
needed to be able to operate at the input voltage from the transformer. High Voltage
Component Associates Inc. manufactures a high voltage ultra fast recovery diode (part
number UX-FOB). Some of the specifications for the UX-FOB include reverse voltage
hold off 8kV. a peak current of 20A for 8.3ms with a sustained current approaching
200mA, and a recovery time of 50ns. This fast recovery time would be more than
adequate for megahertz range switching. Since the rated reverse voltage was 8kV, a
maximum of 8kV input voltage from the transformer per diode could used. The diodes
would also drop a maximum of 14Voltsporward-
2.1.1 40kV Charger Multiplier
The 40kV charger utilized 6 sets of 4x multiplier cascaded in series. With a
transformer providing 2kV input to each, multiplied to 8kV on the output and then
cascaded in series, the final output voltage would theoretically be 48kV. When the diode
losses were factored in (14V per device and 24 devices) the output voltage would be
closer to 47.6kV. As the device needed to operate quickly, it would not necessarily need
to charge to the full 48kV and time could be saved in the charging scheme. For an output
of 8kV, a single diode was all that was needed in the multiplier.
2.1.2 50kV Charger Multiplier
The 50kV charger would require 2 coils from the transformer and so only 2 sets
of 6x multiplier cascades were needed. For an input voltage approaching 6kV and the
output of each multiplier yielding 12kV, the obtainable output voltage would be close to
72kV. This would require doubling of components to handle the voltage. Each capacitor
would have a second one in series to handle 12kV total, and another two in parallel to
bring the capacitance value up to InF. The diodes would not immediately require
doubling to handle the voltage as 6kV falls under their operating range, but if the input
voltage ever increased, the need for doubling of the diodes will become obvious. The
current design took this into account and doubled each diode in the multiplier cascade.
This made for a more robust device for future expansion, for instance, if a higher input
voltage to the multiplier of l2kV was used, the final output voltage could yield as much
as 144kV.
2.2 Gate Driver and H-Bridge
A full bridge topology was chosen to accomplish DC-AC conversion. The input
of the bridge is a constant voltage VDC vvhile the output of the bridge is a square wave
with maximum value of VDC- Full bridges consist of two output legs A and B with a set
of switches and diodes for each leg. With the transformer coil joining the output of the
two legs an H-bridge is formed, as shown in Figure 2.2 in an example of a DC motor
drive circuit.
<•<!
'^'y n , \ '•^«/ .0.-2-.
/\.^___/'\
DC n-.otor load
,1 '-AV •flvi
'o I
L — J C -i 1 ~ -
Figure 2.2: H-Bridge, Single Phase [2]
Since the device would be operating with a bipolar PWM switching signal to
achieve a positive and negative output voltage wave, the control signals to the switches in
one leg are such that the two switches never come on at the same time. This prevents
shorting to the input supply [2]. Referencing Figure 2.2, we let TA+ and TB- be switch
pair A and TA- and TB+ be switch pair B. The switch pairs alone control the magnitude of
the output voltage as when switch pair A is on and switch pair B is off, the output voltage
is a positive Vd while conversely when switch pair A is off and switch pair B is on, the
output voltage is a negative Vd. The percentage of the switching period that a device is
on is called the duty cycle and is defined below in equation 2.2.
D = period
2.2 [2]
The duty cycle of the switching pairs determines the shape of the output waveform. If
one pair is on for a longer percent of the switching cycle than the other, the output
waveform will reflect this, as shown in Figure 2.3. In the figure, the control for leg A
leaves the switched pair (TA+ and TB-) on for considerably longer than the control signal
for B, resulting in the unbalanced square waveform.
tbi 0-
T
I /i.V
(cl 0-
!-•„ ( = ^'AS "• "HN)
(d) 0 -
I I I I
On-state: {T^„,Tf l^)
A^:'. L_ ~ I'd)
-(TA. •/«-)-(T^-. Vfl .)
Figure 2.3: H-Bridge output [2]
In order to allow equal time for each capacitor in the multiplier to charge, a 50% duty
cycle will be used. With frequencies approaching 500 kHz to IMHz to be explored, this
left IGBTS to be an unrealistic solution for the switching pair devices and lead to a
MOSFET approach for the switches in the bridge.
2.2.1 40kV Charger H-Bridge
The gate driver system for the 40kV charger needed to be able to drive a
MOSFET that was capable of handling between IOOVDC and 300VDC- The choice of
MOSFET fell to Semikron's SKM253B020 N channel enhancement mode MOSFET
based half bridge module. The 253B device was capable of drain to source voltages of
200V with maximum sustainable drain current of 250A and 750A pulsed for 1ms
possible. The documentation from Semikron listed the rise and fall times of the device at
100ns and 250ns, respectively. The delay times for on and off at 100ns and 750ns,
respectively, with a drain current value of 150A, and all the while maintaining a low
drain to source resistance of 8.6mQ max. Using these values it was estimated that 833
kHz would be the maximum reliable frequency at which to operate the device.
Once the MOSFETs were decided upon, the decision to drive them needed to be
made based on current and charge requirements. As such, the required charge to tum on
the device needed to be calculated. The relationship between charge, voltage, and
capacitance is shown below in equation 2.3.
C = - ^ 2.3 [3] gate
Using a Vos of 15V and determining Cga.e to be 35.5nF from the specifications sheet the
required charge was calculated to be 532nC. When applied for lus the input current
needed to switch the MOSFET on and off was calculated to be 532mA. For a more
conservative capacitance, which takes into account the miller capacitance of the device,
of 50nF, the value was found to be 738mA. A maximum current draw was calculated by
using equation 2.4 and was found to be 2.66A.
/ . . = - % - 2.4 [3]
The DEIC420 MOSFET driver, manufactured by Directed Energy Inc, was chosen due to
its ability to drive MOSFETs at speeds of up to 45MHz with sourcing and sinking
currents of up to 20A. A minimal output delay time of 35ns with 4ns rise and fall times
were also part of the device's specifications.
Once the gate drivers had been chosen it was necessary to decide on a chip to
drive them. Chosen was Texas' Instmments UC1825 PWM controller which is
optimized for high frequency switching power supply applications. The device had a
minimal propagation delay of 50ns and switching frequencies of up to IMHz. Voltage
and current monitoring pins were part of the device's feedback system, which allowed the
device to be shut down should an over voltage condition occur or too significant of
current be drawn from the power supply. In order to utilize the current monitoring
features, current sense resistors were placed in series with the MOSFET bridge right
above ground that would apply a voltage signal to the pin of the driver. The resistors
chosen were Caddock MP916 lOmQ. which could dissipate 30W and were a low
inductance design. Two of these were placed in parallel to achieve a 5mQ overall
resistance that would yield 0.5V when lOOA flowed through them. The output of this
resistor pair is fed into a non-inverting amplifier with unity gain for isolation.
2.2.2 50kV Charger H-Bridge
With a lower input VDC value of 40V for the 50kV charger, the MOSFET
requirements needed to be re-thought. Much smaller devices could now be considered
and would be easier to obtain due to the lower input voltage. The device chosen was the
IXYS FMM300-0055P which is a single phase leg topology MOSFET package. It is able
to sustain 300A at 55V with an even lower drain to source resistance of 3.6mQ max.
Rise and fall times were 50ns and 40ns respectively while the delay time for on and off
states were 25ns and 70ns respectively. Using these values a maximum theoretical
attainable frequency of 5.4MHz is potentially available, well above the frequency
exploration of this project.
To drive the device, values needed to again be calculated to determine current
draw on the gate. The gate charge was specified as 172nC. Using a VG of 12V and the
rise and delay times the maximum current was calculated out to be 2.23A using equation
3 that was used in the 40kV charger. The power dissipated in the gate at a frequency of
350 kHz was calculated to be 0.722W and the equation used to calculate it is given in
equation 2.5 below.
P -O -V -f u 2.5 [3] •* gate ^gate gale J switch <-
10
A gate capacitance of 14.3nF was calculated using the values from the specification sheet
as well. The average current the supply would have to provide was calculated to be
60mA. The equation used is shown below as well.
L.g=Qga,e-.f\. 2.6 [3]
The gate driver chosen to drive the MOSFET was the Maxim IC MAX4420,
capable of translating TTL/CMOS input logic to high current (6A) and higher voltage
(18V) outputs. The device also possesses minimal delay and rise\fall times of 40ns and
25ns, respectively. Since the device has an 8 pin dip footprint, putting the device on a
board was considerably easier and smaller as footprint space was shrunk compared to the
DEIC420.
The PWM controller chosen was the SX28 made by Ubicom. It is a RISC based
modified Harvard architecture programmable communication controller. The device
operates at 50MHz and can perform calculations at a great rate of speed. This device was
placed on its own board and would be connected fiber-optically from the main driver
board to the processor board to further isolate the device from potential noise interference
caused by the gate driver.
2.3 Transformer
While the voltage multiplier would be increasing the voltage to its final value, a
transformer will be used to allow the voltage to be stepped. This allows keeping the
number of the multipliers to a few stages which in tum reduces charging time. As
voltage multipliers increase the output voltage with respect to ground, the grounding
11
design and transformer secondary coils needed careful insulation techniques to ensure
safety of the device and proper operation [4]. Proper design of the transformer would be
needed also as the device would be pulsed at high frequencies. The pulsing of the
transformer has the advantage of temperature rises being able to be neglected and since
the transformer would only operate for a short time period, the temperature would not be
able to rise as quickly as if it were operated continuously. As the inductance and turns
squared are proportional to each other, minimizing the number of turns will in tum
minimize the inductance of the coils. This is critical to achieving fast rise-times for a
high frequency transformer to operate properly. Size is a major contributing factor in the
design of the transformer, utilizing multiple cores to potentially reduce the leakage
inductance is not an attractive option due to the increased weight and volume of the
transformer that would be added [5].
2.3.1 40kV Charger Transformer
The input of the 40kV charger was going to be less than 200V. Limitations of the
actual MOSFET devices would limit the applied voltage to no more than 175V to operate
the devices safely. Using a conservative ratio of 1:10 would step the voltage up to 1750V
and the 2-stage multiplier would then quadruple it giving a final voltage of 7kV. A ratio
of 1:11 or 1:12 at an even lower voltage of 160 or 145 would also yield similar final
output voltages while minimizing the input voltage to the system. Multiple taps on the
order of 6 would need to be used to apply the output voltage to multiple cascade
multipliers to achieve the 40kV output requirement. In order to handle the high current,
heavy gauge wire would need to be used and the wire width would need to be calculated
12
to determine maximum possible size. The ferrite materials 3F3 and 3C90 were
recommended for the frequency ranges [1] and would be simulated by computer software
to determine how effective they would be at the specifications of the project. Both cores
listed a maximum flux density of 450mT. Initial calculations were performed to
determine the frequency and number of primary turns to prevent the device from
saturating. Equation 2.7 below is used for calculating the flux density with a square wave
input, where Bpeak is the peak flux density, U is the voltage in Volts, f is the frequency in
Hz, Ae is the effective area obtained from the specifications sheet of 368mm and N is the
number of tums.
^^0_25,U^ 2.7 [1] f-N-A,
Using a 175V input, a frequency of 200kHz, and aiming for a single primary tum, it was
determined that the Bpeak was equal to 594mT, above the given value of 450mT. Three
ttims yielded a much easier to manage 195mT. A 3:30 wiring ratio was initially chosen
as a result. Using an ETD59 core of 41.2mm width, the maximum diameter of wire with
0.15 inches overall clearance was 0.049 inches. This is a match with AWG-16 gauge
wire.
2.3.2 50kV Charger Transformer
The input voltage requirements having been changed from the 40kV charger
required re-thinking on how to setup the new charger. A transformer with a tums ratio of
1:150 allowed the 40V to be stepped up to 6kV quite easily which would allow a 36kV
output at the end of a 3-stage multiplier which reduced the number of taps on the
13
transformer to 2 from 5. With 40V being a much lower input voltage and the operating
frequency at 350 kHz, the peak flux density was calculated out to be 77mT. It was
desired that the secondary coils take up as little space as possible with minimal exposure
of copper to prevent breakdown between the high and low voltage side. One hundred and
fifty tums would not practically fit in the bobbin, so a 75-secondary tum wrapped around
twice was chosen as a starting base. With an ETD59 core width of 41.2mm and making
provisions for a '/4" of clearance on one side to isolate the coils from the outside, it was
calculated that the wire diameter could be no more than 0.018 inches. Reading the wiring
gauge charts shows a wire gauge of AWG27 would be sufficient. AWG26 with a
diameter of 0.016 inches was selected as it was more readily available. AWG28 with a
diameter of 0.014 inches was also selected as an alternative.
2.4 Optical Isolation
In order to protect the sensitive gate driver circuitry from the high voltage and
current of the MOSFET and multiplier side, optical isolation needed to be used. To
ttially be usefiil in the system the device needs to have very fast switching abilities that
mplement the MOSFET and gate driver systems and must have a minimal propagation
delay time between the input and the output.
2.4.1 40kV Charger Optical Isolation
The HCPL-3120 device was chosen to optically isolate on the 40kV charger. This
device was chosen due to its minimal propagation delay, on the average of 300ns. The
device's maximum switching time was 500ns which leads to a maximum of 2MHz
14
ac
CO
switching operation ideally. The device also has a wide supply voltage range of 15-
30VDC with a required current input of 5mA. With the wide supply voltage range and
Vi,ii characteristic of (Vce-3), it was a decent match for the UC1825's output voltage of
15V.
2.4.2 50kV Charger Optical Isolation
Due to the different set of requirements of the gate driver circuitry of the 50kV
charger and advances in isolation technology, a different optical isolation device was
chosen. The HCPL-7710 CMOS optocoupler was chosen due to its 40ns max
propagation delay and ability to fit with the CMOS logic that was used in the gate driver
circuitry.
2.5 Power Supply
In order to power the system, different power conditioning needed to be taken into
account for the performance of the system and board layout. In order to make up for the
lack of a high side driver, each high end MOSFET needed the driver to operate as a high
side. This means that the voltage applied to the gate to tum on the MOSFET needed to
be applied with respect to the drain of the MOSFET rather than the ground reference of
the module, which would be with respect to the drain of the low side MOSFET. In order
to accomplish this, a DC to DC conversion method was utilized. In order to compensate
for delays in the conversion devices which would result in a bridge that might not keep
one MOSFET in the same half bridge off at all times one and could potentially short out
15
one of the half bridges and therefore reduce the effectiveness of the charger, all four
MOSFET devices were optically isolated and utilized DC-DC conversion.
2.5.1 40kV Charger Power Supply
In order to decide on which conversion device to use, the total current and voltage
needed to be taken into account. With the current required to tum on the MOSFET
de\ ices calculated out to be 738mA average with a maximum current of 2.66A, a little
extra was given to the device to prevent any potential problems. The device settled on
was C«fcD Technologies VKA60LS15 24Vin, 15Vout, 60W DC-DC converter. It was
chosen due to its high efficiency of 88%, convenient square size, high power output and
high input to output voltage isolation of 1.5kV over 2 seconds. The device also has
intemal circuitry that responds to changes in the load within lOOps. The device was
rather large with a width of 2.28 inches and a length of 2.40 inches, but it was more than
adequate to power the gate drivers. Heat sinks were recommended due to potential heat
increases from power losses which in tum increased the size of the device, but they were
never used as the system was to operate as adiabatically as possible to reduce the size.
2.5.2 50kV Charger Power Supply
With the considerably lower gate charge of the 50kV charger, the current needed
to mn the device was also a considerably lower 60mA. This opened the door for
considerably smaller devices now that the power needed was lower. With the power
needed approaching 1W sustained, a higher wattage was chosen to alleviate stress on the
device. The jump to the 15W C&D Technologies NPH15S2415i was made due to
16
limitations in power output from previous family sizes of 1 -2W and no change between a
low and a 15W in size. The size was considerably smaller than the VKA60 series with a
width of 1.97 inches and a length of 0.98 inches. The device had similar properties to the
VKA60 series with 1.5kV isolation between input and output, 87% average efficiency,
and regulatory controller circuitry.
17
CHAPTER 3
COMPUTER SIMULATIONS
Computer simulations served as proof of concepts before any actual circuits were
ordered or built. With the simulations design areas that needed to be addressed could be
found and taken care of on the first mn through rather than on a second iteration.
3.1 Transformer Simulation
In order to gain a better understanding of the transformer needed to be built for
the 40kV charger, computer simulations were utilized to determine parameters such as
wire thickness and wire pattern. Ansoft's PExprt 5 was the program used in this case.
An ETD59 core and the 3F3 and 3C90 core materials were put into the program to
determine the optimum wire wrapping geometry. The 3F3 core material was chosen as it
has an upper operating frequency of IMHz with a sharp rise in losses at frequencies
above 2-3MHz [1]. Since the voltage step up range was from 200V to 2kV, a simple
N1/N2 ratio of 10 was needed. The maximum value that the program would allow for
power was 20kW which was roughly half of what the goal for the project was. Switching
frequency was set at a variety of frequencies from 150 kHz to IMHz to determine
changing geometries based on frequency while the duty cycle was set at 48% which gave
4% overall dead time. The maximum allowed temperature rise was set to 500°C.
The wiring geometry of the transformer was returned by the program to be 3 coils
with 3 tums each on the primary side of 12-gauge wire with 32 tiims of 16-gauge wire on
18
the secondary side with a temperature rise of 435°C. The temperature rise would be
neglected as the transformer would be a pulsed application that the program was not able
to factor in. Since the program itself would not simulate multiple taps the specifications
were changed to simulate 12kV output with the remaining parameters being kept the
same as the previous simulation. The simulation showed that the geometry would fit in
the device.
3.2 40kV Charger Simulation
The 40kV charger was the first to be simulated using OrCAD PSpice 9. The H-
bridge was simulated using an opening and closing switch with the impedances set to
IMQ for open and to the SKM253 drain to source resistance of 8mQ obtained from the
datasheet. A 200VDC was used for the input voltage. The PWM signal that would drive
the switches was obtained by creating two pulse voltage sources and setting them out of
phase with each other. The diodes used in the multipliers were custom models with a
breakdown voltage allowed to be set that were obtained from Dr. Giesselmann. This
setup would simulate the environment as close as possible despite not having identical
models to the UX-FOB diode and SKM253 MOSFET half bridge. Inductance of 0.5pH
was added to simulate the line inductance on the output of the transformer for each
secondary tap. The transformer was modeled as a pair of coupled inductors which
allowed for multiple taps to be simulated. The coupling was chosen to be 0.999 initially
for proof of concept. After the inductors the multiplier cascades were added in sets of 2
19
in series and 5 overall cascades setups. These were to charge a luF load. The charger
simulation layout is shown below in Figure 3.1.
PAR.aMETERS: [K1 * l .C = 10nF K Uoear Coupling =; S89 COUPLING ' {Coupling} LI = 20uH L2.«2000uH L3 = .5uH d= .S Per =. 2u Toler.= 20
20b\<ic..
tPWIM O
VI. = 0 V ! = 1
0 5ns 5ns X
V2 VI = ^ V2.=
TD = TR =
1 0 0 5ns 6ns
-.PWJI p
Vi
A^ GND
PW=|j?ei'd} •=• PW={pet'd}-=-PER = iper} U PER = {per} U
HB (C) {C}
±r
{C}- {C}-
"m!!^ {C} {C}
{C^ A (C^ 6
{C} {C}
Figure 3.1: 40kV Layout in PSpice
When simulated for 10ms the device was found to perform adequately and
operate within 6ms. The resulting output waveform is shown below in Figure 3.2.
20
a V(C3:2)
Figure 3.2: 40kV Output Simulation in 6ms
The simulation was redone later to compensate for a lower frequency and as such
required two transformers with 3 secondary taps each. The input voltage was multiplied
by 10 and then quadrupled with 6 cascade setups in series. The PSpice layout is shown
below in Figure 3.3.
21
PARAMETERS F] M C • InF Klunear Coupling • t M COUPLING-tCoupingl Ll • 2uH U • 338uH D • 0 «uH d - « Pv • 7u« Tolar • 20
lOuH
•tr+ •••;
l iemF Cl
n
21 6mF ^ CIO
PWM
»N0
i - - v - - v - ^ L1(LI|« ONO
lyi VI • 1 w = 1 ( r \ v i - o / ; . - ( TD-O V > TD'CI ••Q-' TR'iKS I TR. 5ns T ^ TF = 5ns _ J _ TF = 5ns Vj PW « (|>tr"d) PER- tx i )
- „ PW = fptn] " PER • (p«r)
( L2lU) (Cl
I X '{C a
(Cl
Ml r ^ h i L l - X {Cl (Cl
fc' S I S (Cl
U i (cA JTicg J jL21 r nhJ^ I-ll-X
^' •rw'V., I ^
c ,L2, J l | ^ x _ I l | ^ X l
r 5 (12) p L i h i — L j i - X
i-
1.
Figure 3.3: PSpice Layout of 2nd 40kV charger
This setup was also modified to include the capacitor bank from which the
voltage was being drawn, the inductance from the lines of the capacitor bank, the on
board snubber capacitors, and the inductance between the MOSFETs and the transformer
line. The simulation results are shown below in Figure 3.4, and the energy calculation is
shown in Figure. 3.5.
22
gs 1.ens 2.ens S.Ons tens 0 ll(C3:2) -I(C3) - e(l1;2,R2:2) i l)(031:C,C59:1) a e(Cii2:2,Cii2:1)
line
Figure 3.4: 40kV simulation result
I.W
e.sK
; ; ; ;
...;...i....;...;....
j - O ^ i . 1
...L.;....i...;..-.
•ff-i--\-\-
...L.:....:,...:...,
•••r-i---i-
Sffirt
.,-;...|...i-^...i-..|...ui--:--
_i_-i -i—\-' '
...;....;....,.-.;.-
^_^—;._i—I-.-!:-—1—1—:—:—CM—
• - • - i - t - t - - | - T - : - : - -f-
G 8.5»1.25«C«R(19,-6)«P»R(U(C3:2),2)
8s 1.8as 2.ems 5.8115 3.8PIS fi.te
Figure 3.5: Energy calculation
7.9ns
23
3.3 50kV Charger Simulation
Using a similar method and parts as the 40kV charger, the 50kV charger was
simulated in Cadence PSD 14.2. The PSpice schematic is shown below in Figure 3.6.
PARAMFTFPS f ] h» C - InF Coupling B 0 95 L1 - 2uH L2 - 45000UH L3 - 0 SuH d • 0 S Per - 2ua Toler - 20 Ron - 0 006 InltV - -40V dt - 100ns
Lincm COUPLINO - (Coupling)
TR - 5ns TF - 5ns j PW - {per 'dr="_ P W -PER - (per + 2'crfr PER •
hu, S5 - i H h i -
V
^ (L2) •—)h-I 3-11-3 i -
^ ^ -Hii'
V1 - 1 V2 =0 TO = 0 TR = Sns TF = Sns P W - 4 SSm: PER - 5ms
U 1
Figure 3.6: 50kV charger schematic
The switched load on the output of the charging capacitor is to simulate the
effects of charging and discharging the device 200 times a second. The output waveform
is shown below in Figure 3.7. The simulated output current of the device is shown below
in Figure 3.8. The current was found to be within a range of 70-80Amps, which is within
15-25% of the calculated current of 62.5 Amps.
24
es Sns D U ( C 8 : 2 )
Figure 3.7: 50kV charger simulated voltage output waveform
SEL»
es Sns
D a«g(-l(l)1))
Figure 3.8: 50kV charger simulated current input waveform
The results of the simulation were within close range of calculations and gave
more of an understanding of which parameters would need to be modified and how they
25
would affect the system. Most importantly it was found that the inductance between the
MOSFET and the transformer primary coil needed to be kept as small as possible as
ch£mges to the xalue by more than an order of magnitude would have devastating effects
on the rise time of the system. In order to have minimal rise time an inductance value of
50nH or less needed to be obtained.
26
CHAPTER 4
IMPLEMENTATION
4.1 Transformer Wrapping
Transformer wrapping for the 40kV charger followed the recommendations of
PExprt with 12-gauge litz style wire for the primaries and 18 gauge wire for the
secondaries. The secondary taps started at one side and were wound for 33 tums. Each
transformer bobbin would yield 6 sets of 33 to make 3 coils of 66 tums each. Then
insulating tape was applied to prevent breakdown between different separate layers.
Permacel P-222 family tape was used to provide the insulation between the coils. The
tape has a 2mil thick polyimide film layer for a 3.75mil overall tape thickness. The high
dielectric strength of 13,000V and insulation resistance of 1 x 10 MD. provides for
protection against breakdown as the difference between layers would approach 2kV.
Each coil is soldered to every other pin to prevent breakdown between them. Due to
limitations of pin space, the last secondary coil was forced to be soldered next to the
previous secondary pin. Care would need to be taken when the board was assembled to
prevent breakdown between the two coils as the potential difference between them would
be 8kV due to the multiplier. This was helped as the ends of the tiansformers were
covered in heat shrink tubing from inside VS" of tape all the way until they reached the pin
for soldering.
The 50kV charger transformer was built using the same principles, except that it
used a single transformer with 24 gauge wire and 4 sets of 75 tums to yield two coils with
150 tiims. With the even greater voltage difference between the two coils, two layers of
27
tape were applied between the first two sets of 75 and the last two sets of 75. The coil
positive and negative wires were placed 10 pins apart from each other on each end of the
footprint as well to prevent breakdown. Litz wire was used to form the primaries on the
second design as well.
4.2 Board Layout
Board layouts for both chargers needed to be taken seriously to prevent stray
inductance and capacitances from interfering with the output of the PWM signal as the
devices were operating at lOO's of kHz. The layout would need to be treated as an RF
system with multiple ground and source planes trying to eliminate as much unintended
noise from other devices on the board and from the test equipment itself as possible.
4.2.1 40kV Charger Layout
The final schematic of the 40kV charger is shovra below in Figure 4.1. The
complete gate driver layout is shown below in Figure 4.2. Due to the higher input voltage
of the 40kV charger, the MOSFET and gate drivers took up considerable amount of space
on the board as well as the DC-DC converters required to power them. The 8 snubber
capacitors needed also took up a good portion of the board layout as well. This lead to
needing to place the voltage multiplier cascade on its ovm separate board as it would
need to be submerged in oil to prevent breakdown when voltage potentials approached
greater than 20kV between two transformer coils.
28
-1 w.-
1 " «n k
5-- t — ^ ^ ^ -
ft// ^
i
ICPk IGDK ICOk |<v
Figure 4.1: 40kV charger schematic in PSpice
Massive area fills were needed on the input voltage side in an effort to handle
currents that needed to be switched in the MOSFETs. They were alternated between
ground and Vocdnput) layer for 4 layers with the ground on the very bottom and the
VDC(input) at the top. With the maximum potential current drawTi of 3 A per converter and
allowing for minimal temperature rises, the traces for the DC-DC converters were chosen
to be 50mils in width.
29
Figure 4.2: 40kV charger driver board layout
The transformer and multiplier board needed to be laid out once the main gate
driver board had been completed. While the schematic shown in Figure 4.3 was
relatively simple as it consisted of only the transformers, diodes, and capacitors, the
layout would need to take into account considerably high voltages between points. Care
was taken when selecting trace widths as the traces would have considerable current
30
flowing through them and the placement needed to be spaced out adequately to prevent
breakdown between multipliers and transformer coils. The layout is shown below
Figure 4.4.
in
Figure 4.3: Multiplier board schematic
31
Figure 4.4: Multiplier board layout
The darker colored traces ran on the surface of the board while the lighter colored
traces ran below the board. The transformer coil joining traces were purposefully placed
undemeath the board to prevent breakdown between the primary and secondary coils.
Only 5 capacitor layouts were used so that the number of capacitors occupying surface
space would be minimal resulting in the bottom layer having 5 capacitors in parallel
mirrored as the top for a total of 10.
32
4.2.2 50kV Charger Layout
With considerably less voltage on the low voltage side of the system the 50kV
charger la> out was different and less massive than the 40kV charger. Due to advances in
components and lower voltage requirements, the gate driver system was able to fit on a
single 6" by 6" board. The transformer and multiplier setup was able to fit on another 6"
by 6" board that was mirrored in mounting holes for ease of stacking and space
considerations. Considerable care was taken to minimize outside noise affecting the
device. The schematic of the driver board is shown in Figure 4.5. The schematic for the
transformer and multiplier board is shown in Figure 4.6.
33
P26 U12
P27
ETD59>I C
c
Figure 4.5: 50kV Driver Board Schematic
U64HV-MODULE U65 HV-MODULE U66 HV-MODULE
124
13
A JI : z\ y
2 Lv. :
^ ^
4 'LV-
\ \
''
\?J*
L
H"/-
r
6
HVPos
1 2 r
U61HV-MODULE U62 HV-MODULE U63 HV-MODULE
~ I 2
12
HVNeg
2; Uv.
i •-
4 b _
\" \
l-V-t
i
H\-'
Figure 4.6: 50kV Transformer and Multiplier Schematic
34
In order to minimize the inductance of the transfomier primary that runs between the
driver board and the transfomier, the transfomier and driver output needed to be as close
on the board layout as possible. With a 0.5 inch ring inside the outer diameter of the
original circle being added for safety as shown in Figure 4.7, this requires positioning the
transformer in a position that does not leave room for all of the multipliers on the board
surface alone. This problem was solved with the creation of multiplier modules that sit
vertically and take up 0.75 inches of width and 1.7 inches of length compared to the ftill
multiplier that takes 1 .Sinches width and 1.7 inches length. The schematic for the
multiplier module is shown below in Figure 4.8. The module layout is shown in Figure
4.9.
: \ \.
\ \
' 1
Figure 4.7: Transformer and Multiplier Layout
35
P1
P2
e^
o-
Ct1 Ct3
Ct2 ^^ Ct4 D1
2
D3 T
D4 D2
\ / i
t U2^ 2^
\
Ct6 ct8
Figure 4.8: Multiplier Module Schematic
Figure 4.9: Multiplier Module Layout
P3
P4
36
1140kV Charger A^^^mhly
The 40kV charger was assembled. The multiplier board was submerged in oil
prevent breakdown. Heavy gauge spark plug wire with a voltage rating of 50kV
used as the output leads from the multipliers to the capacitor bank. The completed
assembly is shown below in Figure 4.10.
to
was
Figure 4.10: Driver Board and Muhiplier Setup (40kV)
In order to provide the required 1 kJ of energy to the device, a capacitor bank was
built using Mallory LES21823-A 450VDC 1500|aF capacitors. Calculating out the
number of capacitors needed based on the IkJ needed and an input voltage of 125 V
yielded 84 capacitors for a total capacitance of 126mF. The bank is shown below in
Figure 4.11.
37
Figure 4.11: Input Capacitor Bank
With the load capacitance being set at 1.3^F and a high output voltage of 40kV, a
capacitor bank for the output needed to be assembled as well. Maxwell Labs 0.16^F
50kV sealed capacitors were used in the setup with 9 being placed in parallel to achieve a
load capacitance of 1.35pF. A ground line was added to the ground terminal of the
power supply to prevent ground loops from destroying equipment. The capacitors were
put in a plastic bin to prevent arcing to the metal table or any passerby. The capacitor
load bank is shown below in Figure 4.12.
38
Figure 4.12: Capacitor Load Isolated
4.4 50kV Charger Assembly
The 50kV charger design is a much smaller design than the 40kV charger. The
design allowed for two separate 6" circles to stack vertically on top of each other, with a
1" clearance between the lower high voltage board and the upper low voltage board. This
allowed for the low inductance connection between the transformer and H-bridge. The
high voltage side could then be submerged in oil to cover the multipliers and transformer
while leaving the low voltage side exposed to air. The load was a lOnF spark gap setup
designed to break across the gap at 50kV.
39
i^i^^^mea;^
Figure 4.13: Driver Board and Multiplier Setup (50kV)
40
CHAPTER 5
RESULTS
5.1 40kVCharperRec;i,lt^
Due to problems with noise and board errors discussed later in the chapter, the H-
bridge was unable to modulate at frequencies greater than 200 kHz. All tests were
performed with the device operating at a frequency of 187 kHz. Initial tests were done to
\erify the design of the 40kV charger at considerably lower voltages. Starting with as
low as 5 volts in 5V increments up to 25 volts the device was operated in air. The test
was performed with a single InF capacitor in each set of the multiplier cascades, a single
200V 20pF input capacitor charged to 5V, and a considerably lower load capacitance of
0.16|iF. The output voltage was approximately 1.2kV, 240 times the initial voltage and
what the device was designed for. The input voltage was increased up to 25V to test the
system in this configuration. The results are shown in Figures 5.1 through 5.4.
41
piin 1.215 kV 27.8462 m
max 1.215 kV 28.1520 m
Figure 5.1: 5V input to a 0.16|uiF load
V Piaxd) Frequency(1*1 Rise t i iwd*)
currant AM kV
Edae?
m.imm
man sti dev 5.209 kV 126 V
61.07001 m 3.73598 ws 57.1120 m 67.0362 m
Figure 5.2: 15V input to 0.16nF load
42
>«i • i i i i i i n a 11 ii n i iM„, • • ! • • - + • ; - t • ! • . J . . . | . . A . , j . „ ^ . . j . . ^
*• - i - •+ ' I •• 7 " I - - + • • • • ( • • • 4
^
current V m a x d ) 5.37 kV
FrefluancuCl*! Edge? - — 8i*« ti»»tl«) 57.1120 «s 61.2379 BS 5.0159 WS
nean 5,35 kV
Figure 5.3: 20V input to 0.16nF load
67.0362 m
Measi«eiT«nts „ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ dev Mitt "^™«^ nax
ViM!<tl) 6.93 kV 7.S1 kV 350 V 6.93 kV 7.78 kV Fraa«encs)ll*J Edael t 3.510 kHz 1 6.116 kHz ? 232.021 Hz ? 13.21 k" Si$e tiniCl-} 59.79S2 m 1 11.9717 iwt ? 26.7311 «s 1 13.7 «s ? 59.7982
Figure 5.4: 25V input to 0.16nF load
43
Once the device had been tested thoroughly in air the remaining 9 InF capacitors
were added to the multiplier cascade and the system was then submerged in oil to allow
considerabh higher voltages to be achieved. The results of the tests are shown in Figures
5.5 through 5.9. The calculated multiplication factor from the input voltage to the output
\ oltage came out to be a factor of roughly 264, with the transformer providing a tums
ratio of 1:11 and the multipliers providing a factor of 24. The ringing experienced by the
waveforms was due to the setup of the oscilloscope, and the actual peak voltage was
lessened compared to the peak shown in the charts.
current V W K U ) 2f).4 kV
Frequencytl») Edge? Kisa t ined*) 57.5987 m
m)s ^td dev 19.6 kV 700 V
nin 19.2 kV 20.1 kV
58.3868 m 69D.1 ds 57.5987 m 58.8825
Figure 5.5: 65V input to 0.16nF load in oil
44
1 l l l l | V . , 1 i
O[#I:J|^| QlSBBffiilb: Measiioments
current nean V M x l i ) 23.5 kV 21.56 kV
Fraqusncud ) Edg«? ? 6.433086 Hz Rise Hfiied ) 60.1351 m 52.19181 ns
1.30 kV 18.6 W 23 6 kV \fA%, -i-iW.^^^' ^6.433086 Hz 12.45372 m 3.9706 m 63.9951 m
Figure 5.6: 75V input to 0.16nF load in oil
V n«x(l) Frequency(1 ) Rise tined )
current 26.5 kV
Edge? 63.5720 m
man 25.3 kV 13.32197 Hz 59.7928 RS
std dev 500 V 0.0 Hz 2.3034 m
Mln 24.9 kV 13.32197 Hz 57.1569 m
26.5 kV 13.32197 Hz 63.5720 ns
Figure 5.7: 85V input to 0.l6nF load in oil
45
EM
rrequrn^^r! ^ " " E o H i ^ ? „. J ^ ^ , J^ kV § 2 kV
R u e t i ^ . l , 69.93§2.s ^^^i^^s^^^^^ n4°25o92 .s 7 ^ ^ I "^ U ^ j y ^ n S ^
Figure 5.8: 95V input to 0.16nF load in oil
lo»ia|# Measuten»nts
current mean std dev win max V naxd) 32.2 kV 27.08 kV 4.89 kV 4.3 kV 32.2 kV
Frequencyll») Edge? 1 14.85077 Hz ? 2.1620396 Hz ? 13.32197 Hz 1 16.37956 Hz Rite t i « e ( M 73.4171 m ? 63.10744 m ? 13.05683 ns ? 431.9 ss 1 73.4171 ns
Figure 5.9: lOOV input to 0.16nF load in oil
After the device had been tested to 1OOV, the capacitor input bank and output
banks were added to truly test the system. Here the weak links of the system were
46
exposed in the inductances in the lines and noise. The rise time went from 50-60ms up to
200-210ms. The results of these tests are shown below in Figures 5.10 and 5.11 with the
decreasing line being the voltage measured at the input capacitor bank and the increasing
line being the output voltage at the load.
i^^^^^EBtj^ Measuements B
V naxd) Frequency(1") Rise t inet l* )
V Mints)
^ ^ • H |
current 28.2 kV
Edge? 202.717 in 56.0 V
lOOms/div K
Mean 26.2 kV
s 204.466 50.5 V
ns
• oOs
std dev 3.0 kV
4.102 ns 5.4 y
Byy^n
nin 22.3 kV
198.598 MS 43.9 V
4 7 t 5 H
nax 30.0 kV
210.158 ns 58.2 V
Figure 5.10: lOOV input to fiill system, 26.5kV output
47
#Q|#j ^ | | ! H n | | a. 'V ! Measutements
V (wx(l) Frequency(1») Rise t ined*)
V nin(J)
current 34.5 kV
Edge? 202.157 ns 61.3 V
nean 32.9 kV
std dev 1.1 kV
nin 31.7 kV
nax 34.5 kV
202.209 ns 4.375 ns 60.2 V 1.4 V
195.672 ns 209.819 ns 58.6 V 62.6 V
Figure 5.11: 1 lOV input to full system, 30kV max output
Final tested output voltage was found to be roughly 30kV from 1 lOV input with
an output energy of 600J. The device was then tested with a lOOms operating time to
determine how fast the output voltage of the multiplier would rise at the load. Figures
5.12 through 5.14 are in reference to these tests.
48
gl^innv..;j,v
0 « Q # i H l l 50 0 ms/div
Measutements current nean
V naxC) 3.72 kV 3.63 kV Rise t ine ( J 63.33 its 62.01 ns
U O . O s
std dev 110 V 1.18 BS
_JDDDIQI " 5li
nin fax 3.51 kV 3.72 kV 61.05 ns 63.33 ns
Figure 5.12: 20V Input, lOOms
m ifa^ioov,^d,v 2l£M:uO^V/div
. ^ • '
.^' / • '
Y
)*VV».»i-_n.A.^'^>.n_.--' ^'^ 'ir-^v„_^i-,>-r^,r_4J„-^,ji".>^^^,^A.i
MeasL^ements K
y naxtJ) Rise f i n e C )
IM^HHI
current 5.56 kV 67.98 MS
lEO.Oms/divQQI
nean 4.31 kV 63.14 ns
Boos
std dev 930 V 2.34 ns
BuS^^r '' kll nin mix 3.51 kV 5.56 kV 61.05 ns 67.98 ns
Figure 5.13: 30V Input, 100ms
49
lO i iunwd. M §\
A" y
J
/
current nean V naxC) 7.40 kV 6.88 kV
Rise t i neC) 72.20 ns 70.33 ns
std dev 760 V 5.23 ns
nin 5.76 kV 62.55 ns
nax 7.10 kV 73.85 ns
Figure 5.14: 40v Input, 100ms
A problem with the board was found out when this method of testing was
implemented. The gate drive PWM signal was cutting off seemingly at random. There
was dead time between signals and the output voltage was at least 75% less than expected
based on calculations of the multiplier. The problem that occurred with the device was
determined to occur back at the driver board. The input PWM signal looked as it should
from the UCl 825, but when the capacitors were charged above 25V noise began to enter
the system. The PWM waveforms for a 25V input are shown below in Figure 5.15. The
upper is the output of the UCl 825 and the lower is the output of the gate driver.
50
•n I-.
^ 1 * ^
H{ IM L M H h
t w 1 ^
|<« ||M| )
u ^«Jt- WMJ ! ^-^'
Figure 5.15: PWM and gate driver output with noise
An even greater noise problem was found when the device was charged to greater
tiian 40V. The waveforms appeared to have erratic duty cycles that were not related to
each other. This resulted in pulses being on for considerably less than desired, leading to
much lower output voltage as the device was not charging for the entire 100ms period.
The waveform for erratic duty cycles with an input of 50V are shown below in Figure
5.16 with upper being the UCl825 output and the lower being the gate driver output.
ta>.M<i jtMiiW..*.." >'"*•»-»'» " « " !«*"•<.*- i*« t ^ ( ^ M i f c ^
4 . . . . .
•^iJk"','"i^P'^- *
» 1
l ^ ! l jM»Wbi
Figure 5.16: PWM and gate driver output with erratic duty cycle
51
Upon examination of the board, it was determined that the noise was being caused
due to a poor ground setup for the UC1825. When higher voltages were present, the
ground reference for the device would rise to greater than 3V causing the device to shut
off as the voltage difference between the supply and ground ceased to be 15V and fell
accordingly. Once the device shut off the noise would be eliminated, the voltage would
rise to 15V and the device would operate again until the noise became too great and then
the cycle would repeat itself over again.
5.2 Transformer Results
The transformer for the 50kV charger needed extensive testing to verify that the
output voltage would be achievable. The first tests were done with a tum ratio of 1 tum
to 150 at 30V to determine the rise time and voltage output. The rise time was found to
be on the order of 10-15|as and the output was found to be relatively close to 150x the
input voltage. The results for 30V input and 40V input are shown in Figures 5.17 and
5.18, respectively. The stepping effect seen is caused by the 40kV charger noise shutting
the PWM controller off sporadically as referred to in the previous section.
52
1 ^ . ' 0 , i | v , . ^ i ,
current Frequency(l) Edge?
V iflaxd) 4.46 kV
inean std dav nin max ? 57.84851 kHz ? 21.21667 kHz ? 10.72476 kHz ? 71.97232 kHz ? 6.237 kV ? 1.479 kV ? 1.44 kV ? 8.00 kV » iionw) T.nu n I o.coi KV f i . i cy KV I 1 . t1 KV ( B .UU KV
Rise tit^eU) 9.06878 MS ? 9.263251 jts ? 3.826261 ^s ? 5.04449 AS 1 19.78979 jis
Figure 5.17: Transformer 30V Input, 4.5kV Out
Frequency(1) V i w x ( l )
8iS8 t imed)
current Edge?
6.15 kV 9.01159 AS
Figure 5.18: Transformer 40V Input, 6kV Output
53
5.3 Battery Supply
The 50kV charger had a unique aspect compared to the previous setup; the input
charging voltage was going to be supplied by batteries. Lithium ion (LI) 3.7V
rechargeable batteries and sealed lead acid 12V batteries were selected for tests to
determine which would be the optimum battery setup for the situation. Since the input
voltage needed to be 40V, the batteries would at minimum need to be cascaded in series.
In order to provide 40V, the lithium ion batteries would need to be tested to determine the
voltage drop at a certain current draw. A threshold of 3V was set for the test to determine
the current draw. A battery was connected to a 250mQ load for a period of 1 second.
With an average current draw of 11.8A the voltage held at 2.95V. A typical waveform is
shown in Figure 5.19.
_
i\ B T T a T Ii
ms/div PP^ 500.000 ns Tcn r: Meawtenrents i
current V mxl ) 2.9S V
r ean 1.SS8 V
std dev 1.218 V
win 80 nV
Figure 5.19: Lithium Ion Battery Test of 2.95V at 250mQ Yielding 11.8A.
54
The sealed lead acid battery with an Amp-hour rating of 70Ah was tested through a
150mQ load and shown to produce 69A at 10.4V as shown in Figure 5.20.
current 10.11 V
mean 6.896 V
std dev 5.316 V
nin 250 nV
max 17.26 V
Figure 5.20: Lead Acid Battery Test of 10.4V at 150mQ Yielding 69A.
Analyzing the results lead to a determination of 98 LI batteries to provide 70A at
42V and 4 lead acid batteries to provide 70A at 41V. The LI batteries would cost $3 each
compared to the lead acid battery cost of $17.85 each, which is a considerable cost
improvement for the lead acid batteries. The weight savings were dramatic with 98 Ll
batteries weighing in at 9.81bs and 4 lead acid batteries weighing in at 34lbs total. The
decision to go with the lead acid over the LI batteries was one of convenience and cost
over weight. LI batteries would require complex wiring in series and in parallel to
provide the desired curtent and would require much maintenance and monitoring to
55
verify that they were still working property while 4 lead acid batteries were considerably
simpler to setup and maintain in series alone.
5.4 50kV Charger Results
In order to smooth the transition to the new charger, the charger was assembled
one multiplier cascade at a time and tested before adding the next. This allowed for
many tests to ensure proper operation with minimal chances of break down and damage
to equipment. The device was first operated at low voltages and stepped up in 5V
increments to end at 35V for the initial tests. With one multiplier cascade and
tiansformer on the input and a 70nF load, the output voltage and rise time was
investigated as shown below in Figures 5.21 through 5.23 along with the transformer
waveform in Figure 5.24.
f i l K S ^ ^ ^ ^ f l 1 oo.vM- p S ^ ^ E S ^ ^ ^ V I K S ^ ^
- - 4 i • i
- • 1
Measurements »='* i i
VnaxCJ : Rise tine(C) '•
i
V
I
! i
I ^ H H I T S 00 ms/div D Q U
current nean 2.72 kV 2.319 kV 9.1)7? ns 8.8318 ns
j - -
A • • • • ! -
18 040000 MS
std dev 648 V 226.8 MS
• ^ " ^ ^ \
..,,,1 1..,
ByDlill niri 1.38 kV 8.587 ns
, . . | . , ,.. |...,^....:.........[.. .
F.OO riV E 3
nax 2.74 kV 9.400 ns
Figure 5.21: lOV input, 1 multiplier
56
f.-,-^..,.^.,...,....,^, I . , .„ , . . , , . . L , ,.,,„. ,...,,,...i...,|....,„..,„.,,.,.
Figure 5.22: 20V input, 1 multiplier
hni^^^^m^m^m'^fM. mmi^^^^m^i/^^ V
1 ! i /
"""r" r " I i - /
i 1 -
1
„..+ .-,.|-..,t..:.|...4....j....+ ..\.,t..
: 1 i : 4 . ; •
•-*• 1 4- l - f l - t -
^ 1 U^,^rTAJ^ [*1 M l l l i m i i -b ''. '' EimiTlTlTllI 4 0 » 1
y nax . 7 5 ™ r9?ky o T " 7:97 ky
^ 600 mV E
nax 7.97 kV 4.198 ns
Figure 5.23: 35V input, 1 multiplier
57
EM • ' i l L l V , . ' ' , 1 i v
f-i ;
A.'^-'
*S^ '.•tev
. ^ , r"
(f i^. . ;
, , current wean std dev nin nax Frequency (I- 357.99 kHz 357.93 kHz 286.8056 Hz 357.69 kHz 358.09 kHz
V n a x d l 49.7 V 49.9 V 1.3 V 48.8 V 51.2 V
Figure 5.24: 35V input, transformer waveform
Of interest to note is that the voltage never rises to its full potential of 300x the
input and the trend continues as the input voltage is raised. The transformer waveform of
Figure 5.24 above explains this as the input voltage falls from an expected 35V to closer
to 22-25V. This explains the output waveforms as operating as expected, but the voltage
is dropping because the current supplied by the onboard capacitors and the power supply
is too little a value to keep the voltage up. The voltage continues to fall as the charging
pulse goes on and the voltage will eventually stop rising beyond a point regardless of
allowed charging time as was found when the a second multiplier was added, the results
of which are showTi below in Figures 5.25 through 5.27.
58
[u •|i:zi|#| ^ l l j j Q ^ Measurements
current nean V nax I.) 3.66 kV 2.385 kV
Rise tin»(.:) 14.942 ns 17.1242 w
std dev nin 762 V 1.65 kV 3.1510 ns 12.294 ns
3.66 kV 20.966 ns
Figure 5.25: lOV input, 2 multipliers
,...t....(....t.„.l....|....|...4-,. (..*...
\
... + ..,..+...(.. i ..|...
1 1
1 i A .. ! * / ^
T / •
...,j....,....v..,...|....t..| . . . ] ^ ^ t . . . . | . * . . ; . . . . * . 1 .-, .|
tf
• , J :
1 t 1
• ' '[
,|....i,...|...:|...-4.-..;,-..+ ...|..,.t
• • - • ' •
- i - ' f - i - t - i - t -
i
[^ijUjijjgfl 't.[-v|'' i m Q j 2 ^ Measi.Bements _ _ _ ^ _ _
current nean std dev Vnaxt;) 7.11 kV 6.82 kV 630 V
Rise tine (J) 13.785 ns 13.572 ns 1.030 ns
nin 5.54 kV 12.307 ns
nax 7.16 kV 15.246 ns
Figure 5.26: 20V input, 2 multipliers
59
Measutements current nean
V nax(.) 10.44 kV 10.44 kV Rise tinot ) 10.458 ns 10.458 ns
std dev 0 y 0.0 s
Figure 5.27: 35V input, 2 multipliers
In Figure 5.28 below, the drop of the voltage of the transformer is shovm over
time. Even though the charger is still operating for a total time of 20ms, the output
voltage has already begun to fall off as early as 15ms when the transformer voltage falls
below a level where it cannot sustain charging of the load any further.
60
Measueiments current nean
V naxl.M 9.42 kV 9.44 kV Rise t ineC) 10.985 ns 11.061 ns
std dev 40 y 97 jis
nin 9.42 kV 10.985 ns
nax 9.48 kV 11.170 m
Figure 5.28: 35V input, 2 muUipliers, transformer drop
With the inability of the source to provide enough current to keep the transformer
voltage up, installing the sealed lead acid batteries for the input to the charger to provide
enough current to the device became the next step in the process. Two batteries were
used to provide a DC voltage of 12.5V each. As such, all the tests were performed with
one or two batteries in series. The waveform for a 25V input to a two multiplier cascade
shown below in Figure 5.29 and the voltage rises higher than the 35V input shown in
Figures 5.27 and 5.28.
is
61
current V iMxC) 11.07 kV
Rise t lnetJl 15.032 ns
nean 11.08 kV 15.001 ns
Figure 5.29: 25V battery input, 2 multipli lers
Measutetnents current nean
V Bax(2) 12.02 kV 12.04 kV Rise tine(2) 23.355 BS 23.703 ns
std dev 30 V 493 *s
nin 12.02 kV 23.355 ns
nax 12.06 kV 24.052 ns
Figure 5.30: 25V battery input, 3 multipliers
62
current y lUxC ) 20.68 ky
Rise tinetLl 74.43 ns
nean 13.04 kV 76.24 Ks
Figure 5.31: 25V battery input, 4 multipliers
Meas«rai»iits i current mean std dev nin nax
ViMx(2) 22.11 kV 13.434 kV 6.105 ky 2.65 kV 22.27 ky Rise tlneCa) 81.71 ns ? 64.263 ns ? 27.077 ns ? 14.37 ms 1 87.80 ns
Figure 5.32: 25V battery input, 5 multipHers
63
std dev
.i..'.s:l;l i:!!- ,J!JJS» ,u%z , a !„ I r : Figure 5.33: 25V battery input, 6 multipHers
The final output voltage of the initial tests was 22.2kV from 25 V input, a
multiplication factor of 888 versus the designed 1500 for 5 multipliers and 1800 for 6
multipliers. This multiplication factor was obtained in only 120ms, lengthening the
charging time would likely increase the output voltage to considerably closer to the
theoretical value. This is obvious due to the result of the 5 multiplier test and the 6
multiplier test being within 1 OOV of each other for all test shots. Limitations of the
initial tests include inductance in the lines between the batteries and the driver board,
increased length of the primary transformer coil, a charging frequency of 350 kHz, and a
load capacitance that is 7x the designed load capacitance. Modifications to these
parameters all affect the rise time of the device. Steps are being taken to reduce the rise
time as much as possible to fit within the design constraints.
64
CHAPTER 6
CONCLUSIONS
Two chargers were built and tested using similar topologies and hardware to
achieve two different goals in speed and output voltage. Computer simulations in
addition to theory and hand calculations change the design process and allow us to
foresee problem areas that would not have been obvious by looking at a schematic.
Knowledge of the shortcomings of a design helps by anticipation of potential problem
before spending money, time, and effort to build a complicated design, and can even
allow for solutions to be mn through a system without spending more time, money and
effort on something that could potentially not work or make the problem worse.
The 40kV charger experiment was almost successfiil in reaching the goals set out
for it. It came to within 75% of required output voltage despite major flaws and
problems with the board. The dangers present on the device needed to be handled
extremely carefully through the use of isolation and redundant grounds. The
shortcomings in the design did not become apparent until late into the testing phase of the
project. A second design of this board would yield a more rehable PWM signal. A
bigger design change would need to be considered to minimize the inductance between
the H-bridge output and the transformer, as this drastically increased rise-times and
prevented the device from operating quickly under load.
The 50kV charger experiment has been built and tested and is proving to be a
much more reliable and stable charger than the 40kV charger. Due to its more compact
design, better grounding, and fiber optic isolation of the driver circuits the noise problems
65
present in ,„e original charger are „„ ,„„ge. a prob.e.. Minimizing i„a„c,a„ce between
voltage sources and transformer coils is .he biggest problem atTecting rise time of U,e
system.
66
REFERENCES
[ 1 ] Soft Ferrites, Philips Components, The Netheriands, 1996.
[2] Mohan, Undeland, Robbins Power Flertrnnirc-r^ ... A .• • D e s i a n InVin W/.U s> c £^"Wer t^lectroniCS. Convpr te r s . A p p l i c a t i o n s anH
uesign, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1995. ^ ^
[3] Pathak, Abhijit D. M Q S F E I / I G m i G m e D r i y e r s I ^ ^ IXYS Corporation, Santa Clara, Cdifomia, 200L no uesign, ix\h
Kristiansen, M Francis, J.F. Some Basic Fundamentals anH Cnn..pt. nf u M Generators, U.S. Air Force Pulsed Power Lecture Series No. 2, 1981. ^
O'Loughlin, James P., Transformers, U.S. Air Force Pulsed Power Lecture Series No. 18, 1981.
[4]
[5]
67
PERMISSION TO COPY
In presenting tins diesis in partial ftilfillment of die requirements for a master's
degree at Texas Tech University or Texas Tech University Healtii Sciences Center. I
agree tiiat die Library and my major department shall make it freely available for
research purposes. Permission to copy tins diesis for scholarly purposes may be
granted by die Director of die Library or my major professor. It is understood tiiat any
copying or publication of tiiis diesis for financial gain shall not be allowed witiiout my
further written permission and tiiat any user may be liable for copyright infrmgement.
Agree (Permission is granted.)
Disagree (Permission is not granted.)
Stiident Signatiire Date