Investigating Scheduling of Work: A Two-Stage Optimal Matching Analysis of Workdays and Workweeks...
-
Upload
cameron-ryan -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Investigating Scheduling of Work: A Two-Stage Optimal Matching Analysis of Workdays and Workweeks...
Investigating Scheduling of Work: A Two-Stage Optimal Matching Analysis
of Workdays and Workweeks
Man Yee Kan (CTUR, University of Oxford)Laurent Lesnard (CNRS/Sciences Po)
Measuring working timeMeasuring working time
• Stylised data Vs diary data• Stylised data (LFS type) - Recalled
‘usual’ ‘normal’ weekly working hours, taking less account of atypical hours/days• Diary data – more accurate, recording
timing as well as duration of events
Workweek grid diary data Workweek grid diary data
• UK Time Use Survey (ONS, 2000-01)– June 2000 to August 2001–Couple level of data–Response rate: 45% (61% for household
questionnaires, 73% for subsequent diaries)–Workweek grid + 2 day diaries +
questionnaires
The ONS Workweek GridThe ONS Workweek Grid
Sequence analysisSequence analysis• Optimal Matching Analysis (OMA)– Measure of dissimilarity between sequences– Similarity of two sequences based on the difficulty
to transform one sequence into the other (matching)
– Three kind of operations allowed:• Insertion and deletion• Substitution
– Costs for each of these operations– Minimum cost to match two sequences = distance
ExampleA : X – Y – Y – Y
B : X – X – X – X – Y • One solution:
A : X – X – X – X – Y – Y – YB : X – X – X – X – Y
• Another one:A : X – X – X – X – Y
B : X – X – X – X – Y
ExampleA : X – Y – Y – Y
B : X – X – X – X – Y • One solution:
A : X – X – X – X – Y – Y – YB : X – X – X – X – Y
• Another one:A : X – X – X – X – Y
B : X – X – X – X – Y
3 insertions
2 deletions
1 insertion
2 substitutions
Indel Substitution
What is preserved
Events Timing
What is simplified
Timing Events
Dynamic Hamming DistanceDynamic Hamming Distance
• Only substitution operations are used to preserve the timing of events
• Interpretation of substitution cost as the degree of proximity of two states at one point in time
• Substitution costs are inversely proportional to transition frequencies
Cluster analysis of the distance matrix gives the empirical typology
Scheduling of work within the weekScheduling of work within the week
Scheduling of work hours within days
Scheduling of work days within weeks
Scheduling of work within the weekScheduling of work within the week
Scheduling of work hours within days
• 9 to 5 vs. 12 to 8• Same duration, different
scheduling• What is important here is
whether work hours are contemporaneous or not
Scheduling of work days within weeks
Scheduling of work within the weekScheduling of work within the week
Scheduling of work hours within days
• 9 to 5 vs. 12 to 8• Same duration, different
scheduling• What is important here is
whether work hours are contemporaneous or not
Scheduling of work days within weeks
• Working from Mon to Fri vs Sat to Wed
• Same number of days but totally different week
• What is crucial is whether work days are contemporaneous or not
Two-stage OMA
UK 2000 TUS
1st stage: typology of workdays1st stage: typology of workdays
TypeCluster number Name Size (%)
1 1 Standard 9 to 5 34.92 52.13
2 8 to 4 17.212 3 Long long 10.76 15.54
4long day and
evening 4.783 5 Shift morning shift 6.65 13.42
6 evening shift 3.74
7 night shift 3.034 8 Part-time part-time morning 9.66 14.33
9part-time afternoon 4.67
5 10 Short short atypical 4.56 4.56
Tempograms of the typology of workdaysTempograms of the typology of workdays
Simplified workweeks (UK)Simplified workweeks (UK)
2nd stage: Types of workweeks UK2nd stage: Types of workweeks UK
Types of workweeksTypes of workweeks
Type of workweeks UKStandard 26.1Long 20.0Shift 12.1Alternate 5.8Part- time (f week, pt days) 9.1Part- time (p week, standard days) 11.5Part- time (short week) 15.3
Summary statistics of the final typology of workweeks
Summary statistics of the final typology of workweeks
% of workweeks
Work time
No. of days off
No. of workdays
% work on Saturday
% work on Sunday
% work on weekend
%f full Saturday off
% full Sunday off
Standard 26.1 42.2 1.8 5.2 5.0 3.2 4.1 80.4 86.9
Long 20.0 52.1 1.6 5.4 14.9 10.6 12.7 53.8 68.1
Shift 12.1 37.7 1.9 5.1 12.7 11.1 11.9 56.9 63.0
Alternate 7.0 31.7 1.7 5.3 13.5 11.1 12.3 44.3 57.9
Part-time I 9.1 21.1 2.5 4.5 5.7 3.7 4.7 74.1 83.0
Part-time II
10.4 34.3 2.7 4.3 11.5 5.4 8.5 62.5 81.8
Short 15.4 21.6 4.0 3.0 10.7 8.6 9.6 64.7 70.4
SummarySummary
• Applying OMA at two stages to identify workdays and workweeks
• Costs are set according to the transitional frequencies of the events in the whole sample
• 5 types of workdays and 7 types of workweeks• Standard workdays constitute just over 50% workdays • Standard workweeks constitute about 25%
workweeks. • 3 types of part-time workweeks: standard-workday
part-time, part-workday part-time, and short workweek.
Thank you!
• For more detail, see our forthcoming paper at Journal of Royal Statistical Society Series A
• Or, at the Department of Sociology Working Paper Series:
http://www.sociology.ox.ac.uk/documents/working-papers/2009/swp09_04.pdf