Inverse Gas Chromatography for Natural Fibre Characterisation: … · 2019-10-11 · Page 2 of 28...
Transcript of Inverse Gas Chromatography for Natural Fibre Characterisation: … · 2019-10-11 · Page 2 of 28...
Accepted Manuscript
Title: Inverse Gas Chromatography for Natural FibreCharacterisation: Identification of the Critical Parameters toDetermine The Brunauer Emmett Teller Specific Surface Area
Author: A. Legras A. Kondor M.T. Heitzmann R.W. Truss
PII: S0021-9673(15)01661-1DOI: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2015.11.033Reference: CHROMA 357047
To appear in: Journal of Chromatography A
Received date: 14-9-2015Revised date: 10-11-2015Accepted date: 10-11-2015
Please cite this article as: A. Legras, A. Kondor, M.T. Heitzmann, R.W. Truss, InverseGas Chromatography for Natural Fibre Characterisation: Identification of the CriticalParameters to Determine The Brunauer Emmett Teller Specific Surface Area, Journalof Chromatography A (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2015.11.033
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication.As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript.The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proofbefore it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production processerrors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers thatapply to the journal pertain.
Page 1 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
BET specific surface areas were determined by Inverse Gas Chromatography for
samples of flax, kenaf and cellulose fibres.
The effect of experimental conditions on the BET surface area values were
investigated.
Bast fibres showed a large variability within a batch compared to synthesised
cellulose fibres.
An experimental procedure to determine the BET surface area values for natural
fibres is proposed.
LegrasHighlights.doc
Page 2 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Inverse Gas Chromatography for Natural Fibre
Characterisation: Identification of the Critical
Parameters to Determine The Brunauer Emmett Teller
Specific Surface Area
A. Legrasa,b,∗, A. Kondorc, M.T. Heitzmanna, R.W. Trussa
aSchool of Mechanical and Mining Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane,QLD 4072, Australia
bCooperative Research Centre for Advanced Composites Structures Australia Pty Ldt,1/320 Lorimer Street, Port Melbourne, VIC 3207, Australia
cSurface Measurement Systems LTD, 5 Wharfside, Rosemont Road, Alperton, MiddlesexHA0 4PE, UK
Abstract
Inverse Gas Chromatography (IGC) is an alternative technique to determinethe specific surface area of natural fibres. Natural fibres have a complexsurface chemistry and unique microstructure that challenge the current ca-pabilities to perform surface characterisation. This study investigated theinfluence of multiple parameters on the measured Brunauer Emmett Teller(BET) specific surface area for samples of flax, kenaf and BioMid R© cellulosefibres using IGC. The BET surface area of kenaf and flax differed with 0.51m2.g−1 and 1.35 m2.g−1 respectively, the former being similar to the cellu-lose fibres (0.54 m2.g−1). The data was calculated under conditions wherethe BET equation showed good linearity (R2 > 0.995). Repeatability wasexcellent so that two runs sufficed to obtain representative BET surface areavalues. The findings showed the choice of solvent was important for all spec-imens to avoid any misleading data comparison due to molecular orientationeffects that impact the adsorbent-adsorbate interactions. The higher sur-face area of the flax sample, and its higher variability, was correlated witha higher surface roughness observed under optical microscopy. Packing the
∗Corresponding author. Tel: +61 7 3346 9570, Fax: +61 733 654 799Email address: [email protected] (A. Legras)
Preprint submitted to Journal of Chromatography A November 10, 2015
LegrasManuscript
Page 3 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
chromatography column with long or chopped fibres produced results thatwere statistically insignificant.
Keywords: Brunauer Emmett Teller theory, Inverse Gas Chromatography,Natural Fibres, Specific Surface Area
1. Introduction1
Bast fibres have been traditionally destined for the textile industry and2
this remains the primary application with constant innovations for techni-3
cal clothing, textiles etc. However, the last decades have seen a significant4
trend to utilise natural fibres in other sectors, particularly the automotive5
industry [1, 2, 3]. Natural fibres appeal to vehicle manufacturers with their6
excellent strength to weight ratio, low cost, low carbon footprint and avail-7
ability. They are integrated into polymer matrices as filler or reinforcement8
elements for interior components [4, 5]. Biocomposites have also emerged as9
an alternative to wood plastic composites for building materials.10
11
Diversification into novel applications places new demands on the fibre12
processing and properties. One of the major issues is that natural fibres are13
generally hydrophilic and consequently are inherently incompatible with hy-14
drophobic commodity polymers. Natural fibres also suffer from considerable15
batch-to-batch heterogeneity and particularly dimensional variability, which16
directly affect the tensile properties. Natural fibre moisture sensitivity is an-17
other issue for the biocomposite durability.18
19
The compatibility, dispersibility and reinforcement capability of natural20
fibres are related to the fibre surface energy and to its specific surface area.21
Bast fibres have a complex 3D microstructure with multiple membranes en-22
closing the lumen. The chemical composition and the molecular arrangement23
vary between the layers and depend on the fibre specie. The fibre location24
within the plant stem and the growth conditions also play a major role in the25
physico-chemical structure, creating fibres with unique and complex surfaces26
[6, 7]. Figure 1 illustrates the architecture of bast fibre bundles with cellulose27
microfibrils embedded into a matrix of hemicellulose and lignin. The outer28
layer also contains pectins, waxes and other extractives. The fibre surface29
chemistry, its adsorption capacity as well as its wettability and dispersability30
2
Page 4 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
in a matrix correlate with the fibre surface energy values and depend also31
on the accessible surface area. The surface energy provides information on32
the intermolecular forces that can occur at the fibre surface. These combine33
long range Van der Waals forces and short range chemical forces, also known34
as dispersive and polar forces respectively. The nature of these interactions35
and their intensity also depend on the accessible surface area.36
37
Figure 1: Structure of an elementary plant fibre showing the different layers and the ori-entation of the cellulose microfibrils (Adapted from [8] and reproduced with authorisationof the author).
Traditional methods used to determine the fibre surface energy involve38
the measurement of contact angles. Various approaches reviewed by Williams39
[9] and Heng et al. [10] provide methods for measuring droplet angles to cal-40
culate the fibre surface tension. The most common are the Young model,41
the Fowkes and extended Fowkes (Owens & Wendt) approaches and the Van42
Oss et al. model. Capillary rise, Wilhelmy plate and sessile drop are com-43
mon methods and numerous studies have been published on natural fibres44
[11, 12, 13]. Although these techniques are excellent on flat surfaces, nat-45
3
Page 5 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
ural fibre’s porous structure and heterogeneous surface properties challenge46
the accuracy and the validity of the experimental data. These methods are47
based on liquid-solid interactions where swelling and dissolution may occur48
and skew the data.49
50
Inverse Gas Chromatography is an alternative tool to study surface en-51
ergies. IGC is based on solid-gas interactions and the affinity between gas52
probe molecules and the fibre surface molecules is quantified. It is a versatile53
technique to characterise samples of any shape, as long as the specimen can54
be packed in the column and molecular interactions can occur. IGC exists55
since the early 50s and it has been applied mostly to pharmaceutical industry56
[14], for characterisation of zeolites [15, 16] and carbon nanostructures [17]57
but IGC has not been well established yet for natural fibre characterisation.58
Most of the studies on natural fibres have been performed with home built59
equipment, using different solvents and various calculation procedures. The60
lack of information and details of experimental procedures make it difficult61
to compare and validate data. Moreover, the large variability of natural fibre62
properties and their complexity compared to synthesised and well designed63
man made materials means that a systematic study of the common proce-64
dures and models implemented in IGC is required to assess its capabilities65
as a technique to characterise natural fibre surfaces.66
67
IGC requires the specific surface area to determine the surface energy, es-68
pecially as this can depend on surface coverages. Usually, the specific surface69
area of a solid is determined by BET method which uses nitrogen sorption70
[18, 19] or krypton [20, 21], for surfaces areas below 0.5 m2.g−1 where the71
nitrogen technique shows limitations [22]. These techniques involve extreme72
conditions of high vacuum at low temperature (77K) under which the fibre73
properties are likely to change and thus the BET surface area.74
75
An alternative and preferred technique for measuring the BET surface76
area of low surface area natural fibres would be to use IGC at room temper-77
ature. This paper systematically studies the influence of various parameters78
that may affect the measured specific surface area using BET theory with79
IGC. On the basis of the results of this study, a procedure applicable to nat-80
ural fibres is proposed.81
82
4
Page 6 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
2. BET theory83
The BET theory was developed with nitrogen but is applicable to other84
gases such as those used in IGC. Five types of isotherms can occur depend-85
ing on the adsorption scenario [23, 24]. The BET equation is applicable on86
isotherms type II and IV only, where there is a formation of a monolayer fol-87
lowed by multi-layers and further capillary condensation. The BET equation88
is given by:89
P
n(P0 − P )=
C − 1
nmC(P
P0
) +1
nmC(1)
90
where P is the solvent partial pressure in the gas phase (Torr), P0 the satu-91
rated solvent vapor pressure (Torr), n the amount of gas adsorbed (Mol.g−1),92
nm the monolayer capacity (Mol.g−1) and C the BET constant. The BET93
equation fits the isotherm (type II or IV) over a specific range of equilibrium94
pressure P/P0, usually for 0.05 < P/P0 < 0.35. The monolayer capacity95
nm can be determined from the slope and intercept of the linearised BET96
equation fitted to the isotherm. The BET specific surface area (m2.g−1) is97
expressed as:98
SBET = aNAnm (2)
99
with a the molecule cross section area, NA the Avogadro Number and nm100
the monolayer capacity. Since nm and a are known, the specific surface area101
SBET can be calculated.102
103
3. Experimental procedure104
3.1. Materials105
Two types of bast fibres and one type of cellulose fibre were used in the106
study. The Canadian linseed flax (variety unknown) specimen was supplied107
by Composites Innovation Centre (CIC), Winnipeg, Manitoba (Canada).108
The fibres were not retted and have been mechanically decorticated by a lab109
scale scutching machine [25]. Kenaf fibres (variety KK60) were provided by110
Engage Eco Products Co. Ltd. in Thailand. The fibres were locally ribbon111
retted, rinsed and dried before shipping. Both flax and kenaf samples were112
5
Page 7 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
characterised in the as-received conditions. BioMid R© cellulose fibres were113
supplied by ENC International (South Korea). BioMid R© is a 100% cellulose-114
based continuous filament produced from dry-jet-wet spinning process. The115
feedstock is a mixture of softwood and hardwood chips, a by-product from the116
wood pulp and paper industry. The cellulose is extracted from the biomass117
and then injected through a spinneret. Also, BioMid R© structure is different118
from the bast fibres that have a membrane structure. BioMid R© fibres are119
expected to be a pure cellulose sample and was considered as a reference for120
the study. The sample details are summarised in Table 1.121
Table 1: Industrial fibre grades used for the study
Sample Variety Fibre processing
Cellulose BioMid R© (ENC International,South Korea)
Dry-jet-wet spinningprocess
Kenaf KK60 (Thailand) Water retting
Flax Linseed flax (Canadian varietyunknown)
Mechanical decortica-tion by scutching
3.2. Methods122
The strategy to study the influence of experimental parameters on the123
output BET value involved four criteria. The experimental approach is de-124
tailed in the following paragraphs and summarised in Table 2.125
126
• Reproducibility within the column:127
Various diffusion processes can drive the elutant molecule flow in a column128
packed with porous material. These scenarios depend on the column dimen-129
sion, the sample porosity, the packing homogeneity and the flow rate [23].130
Natural fibre pore widths range from micrometers down to a few nanometers131
[26, 27, 28] and so these exceed in size the elutant molecules (cross sectional132
area ca. 10 A2 to 100 A2 [29]). As a consequence, the free diffusion pro-133
cess dominates the molecule flow into the column: the gas probe molecules134
travel both in axial and longitudinal directions. As they elute, these likely135
encounter cavities and asperities where they will adsorb before complete elu-136
tion. Whether this phenomenon occurs randomly and if it further affects the137
flow rate is questionable. Successive runs were performed on the same chro-138
matography column under identical experimental conditions to assess the139
6
Page 8 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
reproducibility of the BET experiment. Note that this experiment is pos-140
sible with inverse gas chromatography as the column can be used multiple141
times.142
143
• Gas probe:144
Various solvents can be used to run a BET experiment with IGC, the re-145
quirement being non-polar adsorbates where surface and no bulk sorption146
occurs. Octane, heptane and cyclohexane are common adsorbates. Whether147
the nature of the solvent affects the BET value of natural fibres or not has148
not been clarified so far and few authors specify which gas probe has been149
used to determine the specific surface area. For the sake of clarity and to150
know if data obtained from various solvents can be compared, the impact of151
the solvent choice on the output value was investigated. Among the common152
adsorbates used for the BET experiment, octane and cyclohexane were se-153
lected for two main reasons. The latter showed better retention peaks than154
other solvents, for instance, hexane and heptane had too low retention times.155
The second reason is that octane and cyclohexane differ in their molecular156
structure and chemical properties, which facilitates the observation of effects157
due to molecule geometry.158
159
• Variability within a batch:160
The variability of the BET specific surface area measured using octane was161
investigated within a batch of natural fibres. The specific surface area is162
expected to fluctuate as the diameter, porosity and the surface profile vary163
between fibres. Little information is currently available as to whether the164
specific surface area changes and to what extent. A chromatography column165
usually contains ca. a gram of fibres i.e. a relatively small amount of mate-166
rial. It is necessary to estimate how variable the BET value is for grading167
procedures.168
169
• Sample packing:170
Another variable rarely specified is the sample packing. Unlike powder par-171
ticles, natural fibres can be packed in the column in multiple ways. For172
instance, post-processed fibres are usually chopped and well separated com-173
pared with fibres as received. Short and long fibres may behave differently in174
the inverse gas chromatography column. In this experiment, the fibres were175
cut into ”short” fibres of 2 cm length and compared with ”long” fibres of176
ca. 10 cm length (usual fibre length in a column of 4 mm internal diameter).177
7
Page 9 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
178
Table 2: Strategy to investigate the critical parameters for BET experiment
Criterion Experimental Method
Reproducibility within the column Repeat 3 runs per columnGas probe Run with octane and cyclohexaneVariability within a batch Run 5 columns per batch
Sample packing Pack the column with long (10 cm)and short (2 cm) fibres
All experiments were conducted with an Inverse Gas Chromatograph Sur-179
face Energy Analyser (IGC SEA) from Surface Measurement Systems (Lon-180
don, UK). This commercial equipment is set-up for pulse chromatography;181
a precise amount of adsorbate is transported by the carrier gas through the182
column containing the fibres. Adsorption followed by desorption occur at the183
fibre surface and an elution peak results. The configuration of the IGC SEA184
is schematised in Figure 2. The retention time was determined by a Flame185
Ionization Detector (FID) to benefit a high sensitivity compared to thermal186
conductivity detector [14, 30]. Silane-treated glass columns were filled with187
ca. 0.7 g to 1 g of fibres. The 4 mm internal diameter column was preferable188
for packing the fibres. To insert the fibres in a column, wax-free dental floss189
was tied to the end of the fibres and then pulled through the column. Once190
the fibres were in place, the dental floss was removed and the column was191
then plugged with silanised glass wool to avoid any contamination in the in-192
jection system. For the experiment with chopped fibres, the short fibres were193
introduced in the column using a funnel and then packed with a column pack-194
ing device. The columns were then plugged as mentioned previously. The195
sample bed length was ca. 30 mm to minimise peak broadening due to free196
molecular diffusion in the column. Helium was the carrier gas and methane197
was the reference gas to determine the dead time, which represents the time198
necessary for a molecule to travel across the column without any interaction.199
Octane and cyclohexane were injected over a coverage range (n/nm) within200
0.01 to 0.44, the minima and maxima values depending on the sample mass.201
All experiments were carried out under the same conditions (30◦C, 0% RH)202
with column conditioning for 1 hour (40◦C, 0% RH) before the first injection203
only. The carrier gas flow rate was set up at 10 mL.min−1.204
205
8
Page 10 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Figure 2: IGC Surface Energy Analyser set up (Modified image supplied by SMS).
The BET theory was applied to determine the specific surface area of the206
fibres according to the following procedure:207
208
- The retention time was determined as the time corresponding to the209
peak centre of mass (CoM) rather than the time of the maximum FID signal.210
The peak CoM was preferred as most of the elution peaks were asymmetric.211
212
- The solvent vapour pressure P0 was calculated with the modified Antoine213
equation [29] described as:214
P0 = exp[C1 +C2
T+ C3ln(T ) + C4T
C5 ] (3)
215
with C1, C2, C3, C4 and C5 constants specific to the solvent and T the216
temperature (K). P0 is expressed in Pa.217
218
- The linearised BET equation was fitted to the isotherms (amount ad-219
sorbed vs. relative pressure) in the range of 0.05 < P/P0 < 0.35. The range220
9
Page 11 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
of calculation was adjusted so that R2 ≥ 0.995 with P/P0 upper limit down221
to a minimum of 0.25 to get representative values.222
4. Results and Discussions223
4.1. Reproducibility within a column224
Table 3 shows the repeatability of the BET experiment with octane on225
both bast fibres and on the BioMid R© sample. In each case, all the runs226
were performed on the same column. An illustration of the data fitted to the227
linearised BET equation for the kenaf sample is given in Figure 3.228
229
Table 3: Reproducibility BET experiment
BET Specific Surface Area (Octane) (m2.g−1) at 30◦C and 0% RH
Specimen Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Mean Std (%)
BioMid R© 0.546 0.545 0.543 0.545 0.1Kenaf 0.503 0.494 0.501 0.500 0.5Flax 1.373 1.423 1.440 1.412 3.5
With standard deviations less than 5% for all samples, the BET experi-230
ment showed excellent reproducibility. One run should suffice to determine231
the BET specific surface area of a fibre specimen but it is suggested that two232
runs be completed to avoid any possible outlier. The BET surface area of233
BioMid R© and kenaf fibres were similar (0.55 m2.g−1 and 0.50 m2.g−1) whilst234
the flax fibre showed tripled specific surface area (1.41 m2.g−1). This could235
be directly related to the surface roughness of the flax fibres. This batch has236
not been retted, which means that the microbial degradation process that237
helps separation of the fibres from non-fibrous tissues was omitted. Morri-238
son et al. [31] and Akin et al. [32] showed that insufficient retting leads239
to poor separation of the non-fibrous material (cuticle/epidermis and woody240
core) from the bast fibres. These remaining tissues tend to entangle with241
the fibres during next mechanical processing steps of scutching and hack-242
ling. In this study, the flax fibres were scutched without being retted and243
hence it was expected to observe numerous non-fibrous tissues spread on the244
surface. Optical microscope images (Figure 4) clearly showed that the flax245
fibres were covered with fragments of cuticle and epidermis tissues whereas246
10
Page 12 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Figure 3: Plot of P/n(P0 − P ) versus P/P0 for successive runs on kenaf fibres.
the kenaf fibre surface appeared neat and clean, similar to the BioMid R fi-247
bres. The flax fibre surface roughness and heterogeneity accounted for a high248
BET surface area. BET surface areas of plant fibres were measured with IGC249
under similar conditions (30◦C, 0% RH); Ashori et al. [33] found to cotton250
fibres specific surface area of 0.75 m2.g−1 and Cordeiro et al. [34] obtained251
BET area values from bast fibres and other plant fibres that ranged from252
0.10 m2.g−1 to 2.79 m2.g−1. BET specific surface areas were also reported253
on grass fibres with values between 0.81 m2.g−1 and 1.19 m2.g−1 [35].254
255
11
Page 13 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Figure 4: Optical microscope images of A) BioMid R©, B) Kenaf and C) Flax fibre samples(Images obtained with an Axio Zoom.V16 microscope by CIC).
12
Page 14 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
4.2. Solvent dependence256
BET values calculated with different solvents are shown in Table 4. For257
each specimen, both octane and cyclohexane BET experiments were per-258
formed on the same sample column with a minimum of 2 runs. Both BioMid R©259
and bast fibres showed a similar trend; BET values obtained with cyclohexane260
were lower than those obtained with octane. These results should be related261
to molecular orientation. Cyclohexane has predominantly a chair conforma-262
tion whilst octane is linear, so the effect of molecular orientation is stronger263
in the latter. The average cross sections are 6.3 × 10−19 m2 and 3.9 × 10−19264
m2 for octane and cyclohexane respectively, but octane width cross section265
is much smaller hence the molecules can access pores that are “invisible”for266
cyclohexane. This explains why BET values measured with octane are higher267
than those calculated with cyclohexane. The effect of molecular orientation268
and the consideration of uncertainties due to average “a”values for the cal-269
culation of surface energy have been previously discussed by Donnet et al.270
and Mukhopadhyay et al. [36, 37].271
272
Note that flax and kenaf fibres showed a large difference between octane273
and cyclohexane BET experiment compared to BioMid R© sample (ca. 50%274
and 15% difference respectively). The BioMid R© fibres were manufactured275
using a wet spinning process. These fibres are expected to be relatively276
homogeneous and to have relatively smooth surface even at the molecular277
level. Natural fibres on the other hand are known to be highly heterogeneous278
both physically and chemically (see Figure 1). Consequently, their surface279
might be expected to have asperities over a range of length scales down to280
the molecular level. Such features would amplify the effects of adsorbate281
orientation on the surface. The more linear octane molecule would have the282
ability to pack more densely on the surface giving a higher specific surface283
area while the cyclohexane molecule would pack less densely on the surface284
and generate lower measured specific surface areas. This is consistent with285
the observed results.286
287
4.3. Variability within a batch288
As expected, the variability within the bast fibre batches was more pro-289
nounced than for the BioMid R© fibres. As illustrated in Fig.5, the latter290
averaged 0.54 m2.g−1 and fell within 0.5 m2.g−1 and 0.58 m2.g−1 i.e. ± 7%291
13
Page 15 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Table 4: Effect of adsorbateBET Specific Surface Area (m2.g−1)
Specimen Solvent Mean Std (%)
BioMid R© Octane 0.55 0.1Cyclohexane 0.47 0.2
Kenaf Octane 0.50 0.5Cyclohexane 0.27 0.2
Flax Octane 1.41 3.5Cyclohexane 0.75 0.3
variation. Bast fibre BET surface area values spread over wider range; be-292
tween 1.22 m2.g−1 and 1.49 m2.g−1 for flax and 0.38 m2.g−1 to 0.63 m2.g−1 for293
kenaf batches, hence a variation of ca. ± 10% and ± 25% respectively. This294
was to be expected as natural materials have quite variable structure due295
to growth conditions, position within the plant, and damage during harvest-296
ing and processing. The range of BET surface areas reflects this phenomenon.297
298
14
Page 16 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Figure 5: Individual value plots of the BET Surface Area (m2.g−1) with 95% ConfidenceInterval (CI).
4.4. Sample packing299
Table 5 shows the effect of fibre length on the BET values. The ranges of300
variation for BioMid R© (ca. +10%) and kenaf (ca. +20%) fibres agree well301
with the previous findings on the variability within a batch and the effect of302
fibre length could be considered negligible in that case. However, short flax303
fibres BET surface area values stepped outside the confidence interval (95%304
CI) with a variation of 20% i.e. chopping the fibres induced significant effects.305
The non consistency of these results could be related to the physico-chemical306
differencies between the fibres. As seen in Figure 4, both BioMid R© and307
kenaf fibre surface were neat and homogeneous compared to the flax fibres308
that were unretted. Chopping the latter may have shredded the fibre ends,309
i.e. multiplied the accessible surface area. It may also have peeled off some310
of the cuticle/epidermis fragments and hence opened access to new surfaces311
that displayed different chemistries than the outer layer. Both phenomena312
likely generated new molecular interactions with the adsorbate.313
314
15
Page 17 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Table 5: Effect of fibre length
BET Specific Surface Area (m2.g−1)
Specimen Packing Mean Std (%)
BioMid R© (Octane) long 0.55 0.1short 0.59 0.4
Kenaf (Octane) long 0.50 0.5short 0.42 0.1
Flax (Cyclohexane) long 0.75 0.3short 0.92 1.5
5. Conclusions315
The BET specific surface area of kenaf and flax fibres differed, with an316
average of 0.51 m2.g−1 vs. 1.35 m2.g−1 respectively and the kenaf fibres317
showed similar BET value to cellulose fibres (ca. 0.54 m2.g−1). The high318
specific area of flax, compared with kenaf and cellulose, was related to the fi-319
bre surface roughness. Bast fibres had larger batch-to-batch variability than320
synthesised cellulose fibres, which is a consequence of natural fibre structural321
irregularities and heterogeneous properties.322
323
The BET values obtained by IGC SEA showed a noticeable dependence324
on the elutant properties. For all specimens, the specific surface areas calcu-325
lated from octane measurements were higher than those from cyclohexane.326
This phenomenon is likely an effect of molecular orientation. Sample packing327
also affected the BET surface area values but no clear trend could be estab-328
lished. It is possible that chopping the unretted flax fibres either shredded329
the fibre ends or removed lightly adherent cuticle /epidermal material on the330
surface increasing the accessible surface area.331
332
Based on these findings, the following protocol for determining the BET333
specific surface area of natural fibres by IGC is proposed:334
335
• Pack the chromatography column with the sample as is. Chopping fi-336
bres may induce non negligible effects.337
338
• Consider BET values obtained with the same solvent only for direct339
16
Page 18 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
comparison.340
341
• For accurate calculation, consider the linearised BET equation over a342
coverage range (n/nm) so that the correlation factor R2 > 0.995.343
344
• Since repeatability is excellent (commercial equipment), two runs per345
column should be sufficient to ensure confident results, assuming none of the346
data is an outlier.347
348
These experimental data highlight the structural heterogeneity between349
different species of bast fibres, in term of both chemical and physical singu-350
larities. Further data acquisition on natural fibres is necessary to strengthen351
these models and extend the database to get consistent references. However,352
the current results have demonstrated the potential of IGC for characteri-353
sation of natural fibre surfaces. The authors encourage the development of354
inverse gas chromatography for fibre grading as a complementary technique355
to traditional methods.356
6. Acknowledgements357
This study was undertaken as part of a collaboration between the Com-358
posites Innovation Centre (CIC) and the Cooperative Research Centre for359
Advanced Composites Structures Australia (CRC-ACS) research project, es-360
tablished and supported under the Australian Government’s Cooperative361
Research Centre Program. The author acknowledge the CRC-ACS Project362
P1.1 team and the CIC for their access to equipment. The technical support363
from Surface Measurement Systems to develop the IGC experimental work364
is also gratefully acknowledged.365
7. References366
[1] J. Holbery, D. Houston, Natural-fiber-reinforced polymer composites in367
automotive applications, JOM 58 (11) (2006) 80–86.368
[2] A. Ashori, Wood-plastic composites as promising green-composites for369
automotive industries!, Bioresource Technology 99 (11) (2008) 4661 –370
4667, exploring Horizons in Biotechnology: A Global Venture.371
17
Page 19 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
[3] M. Karus, M. Kaup, Natural fibres in the european automotive industry,372
Journal of Industrial Hemp 7 (1) (2002) 119–131.373
[4] M. Huda, L. Drzal, D. Ray, A. Mohanty, M. Misra, Natural-fibre com-374
posites in the automotive sector, Properties and performance of natural-375
fibre composites (2008) 256–261.376
[5] G. Marsh, Next step for automotive materials, Materials Today 6 (4)377
(2003) 36 – 43.378
[6] K. Charlet, C. Baley, C. Morvan, J. Jernot, M. Gomina, J. Brard, Char-379
acteristics of herms flax fibres as a function of their location in the380
stem and properties of the derived unidirectional composites, Compos-381
ites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 38 (8) (2007) 1912 –382
1921.383
[7] K. Satyanarayana, J. Guimaraes, F. Wypych, Studies on lignocellulosic384
fibers of brazil. part i: Source, production, morphology, properties and385
applications, Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing386
38 (7) (2007) 1694 – 1709.387
[8] C. Baillie, 4. Natural Fibre Sources, Green Composites - Polymer Com-388
posites and the Environment, Woodhead Publishing, 2004.389
[9] D. R Williams, Particle engineering in pharmaceutical solids processing:390
surface energy considerations, Current pharmaceutical design 21 (19)391
(2015) 2677–2694.392
[10] J. Y. Y. Heng, D. F. Pearse, F. Thielmann, T. Lampke, A. Bismarck,393
Methods to determine surface energies of natural fibres: A review, Com-394
posite Interfaces 14 (7-9) (2007) 581–604.395
[11] G. Collins, A surface tension method for measuring the perimeters of396
fibres and the contact angle of liquids against fibres, Journal of the397
Textile Institute Transactions 38 (2) (1947) T73–T77.398
[12] H. Shen, S. Nutt, D. Hull, Direct observation and measurement of fiber399
architecture in short fiber-polymer composite foam through micro-ct400
imaging, Composites Science and Technology 64 (13) (2004) 2113–2120.401
18
Page 20 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
[13] M. Z. Rong, M. Q. Zhang, Y. Liu, H. M. Yan, G. C. Yang, H. M.402
Zeng, Interfacial interaction in sisal/epoxy composites and its influence403
on impact performance, Polymer composites 23 (2) (2002) 182–192.404
[14] S. Mohammadi-Jam, K. E. Waters, Inverse gas chromatography appli-405
cations: A review, Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 212 (0)406
(2014) 21–44.407
[15] A. Askin, C. Bilgic, Thermodynamics of adsorption of hydrocarbons on408
molecular sieves nay and cay by inverse gas chromatography, Chemical409
Engineering Journal 112 (1) (2005) 159–165.410
[16] A. V. J. C. Eva Dıaz, Salvador Ordonez, Adsorption characterisation of411
different volatile organic compounds over alumina, zeolites and activated412
carbon using inverse gas chromatography, Journal of chromatography A413
1049 (1) (2004) 139–146.414
[17] E. Papirer, E. Brendle, F. Ozil, H. Balard, Comparison of the surface415
properties of graphite, carbon black and fullerene samples, measured by416
inverse gas chromatography, Carbon 37 (8) (1999) 1265–1274.417
[18] H. K. Livingston, The cross-sectional areas of molecules adsorbed on418
solid surfaces, Journal of Colloid Science 4 (5) (1949) 447–458.419
[19] A. Bismarck, I. Aranberri-Askargorta, J. Springer, T. Lampke,420
B. Wielage, A. Stamboulis, I. Shenderovich, H.-H. Limbach, Surface421
characterization of flax, hemp and cellulose fibers; surface properties422
and the water uptake behavior, Polymer Composites 23 (5) (2002) 872–423
894.424
[20] R. A. Beebe, J. B. Beckwith, J. M. Honig, The determination of small425
surface areas by krypton adsorption at low temperatures, Journal of the426
American Chemical Society 67 (9) (1945) 1554–1558.427
[21] A. J. Rosenberg, Rapid, precise measurements of krypton adsorption428
and the surface area of coarse particles1, Journal of the American Chem-429
ical Society 78 (13) (1956) 2929–2934.430
[22] K. Sing, The use of nitrogen adsorption for the characterisation of porous431
materials, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering432
Aspects 187 (2001) 3–9.433
19
Page 21 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
[23] F. Thielmann, Introduction into the characterisation of porous materials434
by inverse gas chromatography, Journal of Chromatography A 1037 (12)435
(2004) 115–123.436
[24] B. Charmas, R. Leboda, Effect of surface heterogeneity on adsorption on437
solid surfaces: Application of inverse gas chromatography in the studies438
of energetic heterogeneity of adsorbents, Journal of Chromatography A439
886 (12) (2000) 133–152.440
[25] M. Alcock, L. Van Loon, C. Karunakaran, S. Huo, S. Potter, C. Ul-441
ven, High resolution characterisation of biofibre/resin interface bonds of442
thermoset composites through synchrotron illumination, ECCM15, 15th443
European Conference on Composite Materials, Italy, 24-28 June 2012.444
[26] A. K. Bledzki, M. Letman, A. Viksne, L. Rence, A comparison of com-445
pounding processes and wood type for wood fibre-pp composites, Com-446
posites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 36 (6) (2005) 789–447
797.448
[27] J. E. Stone, A. M. Scallan, Effect of component removal upon the porous449
structure of the cell wall of wood, Journal of Polymer Science Part C:450
Polymer Symposia 11 (1) (1965) 13–25.451
[28] M. A. Arsene, K. Bilba, H. Savastano Junior, K. Ghavami, Treatments452
of non-wood plant fibres used as reinforcement in composite materials,453
Materials Research 16 (2013) 903–923.454
[29] R. H. Perry, D. W. Green, J. O. Maloney, Perry s chemical engineers455
handbook, McGraw Hill, New York, 1997.456
[30] W. Wang, Q. Hua, Y. Sha, D. Wu, S. Zheng, B. Liu, Surface properties457
of solid materials measured by modified inverse gas chromatography,458
Talanta 112 (2013) 69–72.459
[31] M. J. Morrison, A. G. Andre, Processing apparatus and methods, uS460
Patent App. 10/586,194 (Jan. 14 2005).461
[32] D. E. Akin, L. L. Rigsby, W. Perkins, Quality properties of flax fibers462
retted with enzymes, Textile research journal 69 (10) (1999) 747–753.463
20
Page 22 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
[33] A. Ashori, M. Ornelas, S. Sheshmani, N. Cordeiro, Influence of mild464
alkaline treatment on the cellulosic surfaces active sites, Carbohydrate465
Polymers 88 (4) (2012) 1293–1298.466
[34] N. Cordeiro, C. Gouveia, A. Moraes, S. Amico, Natural fibers character-467
ization by inverse gas chromatography, Carbohydrate Polymers 84 (1)468
(2011) 110 – 117.469
[35] N. Cordeiro, M. Ornelas, A. Ashori, S. Sheshmani, H. Norouzi, Inves-470
tigation on the surface properties of chemically modified natural fibers471
using inverse gas chromatography, Carbohydrate Polymers 87 (4) (2012)472
2367–2375.473
[36] J.-B. Donnet, R.-Y. Qin, M.-J. Wang, A new approach for estimating474
the molecular areas of linear hydrocarbons and their derivatives, Journal475
of colloid and interface science 153 (2) (1992) 572–577.476
[37] P. Mukhopadhyay, H. Schreiber, Aspects of acid-base interactions and477
use of inverse gas chromatography, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physico-478
chemical and Engineering Aspects 100 (1995) 47 – 71.479
21
Page 23 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Figure 1: Structure of an elementary plant fibre showing the differentlayers and the orientation of the cellulose microfibrils (Adapted from [8] andreproduced with authorisation of the author).
Figure 2: IGC Surface Energy Analyser set up (Modified image suppliedby SMS).
Figure 3: Plot of P/n(P0 − P ) versus P/P0 for successive runs on kenaffibres.
Figure 4: Optical microscope images of A) BioMid R©, B) Kenaf and C)Flax fibre samples (Images obtained with an Axio Zoom.V16 microscope byCIC).
Figure 5: Individual value plots of the BET Surface Area (m2.g−1) with95% Confidence Interval (CI).
22
Page 24 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
LegrasFigure 1.pdf
Page 25 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
LegrasFigure 2.pdf
Page 26 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
LegrasFigure 3.pdf
Page 27 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
LegrasFigure 4.pdf
Page 28 of 28
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
LegrasFigure5.pdf