Introduction to the European Union Dr. Milada Anna Vachudova Associate Professor Department of...
-
date post
19-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Introduction to the European Union Dr. Milada Anna Vachudova Associate Professor Department of...
Introduction to the European Union
Dr. Milada Anna VachudovaAssociate ProfessorDepartment of Political Science
Dr. Erica E. EdwardsExecutive DirectorEuropean Union Center of ExcellenceUNC Chapel Hill
Is it a state or is it an international organization?
Greatest density of institutions and rules of any international organization
Primarily concerned with economic integration:
1. Common internal market: free movement of goods, labor, services and capital
2. Common currency, the Euro (2002)
3. Single voice in international economic negotiations
1981-86: Greece, Spain, Portugal
1995: Sweden, Austria, Finland
2004: “big bang”– eight countries in Central and Eastern Europe plus Malta and Cyprus
2007: Bulgaria and Romania
State or International Organization?
Common external border for most EU countries (but no common immigration policy)
Progress in forging a common foreign and defense policy.
1. EU peacekeeping + police missions abroad
2. Successful democracy promotion through enlargement.
3. European Neighborhood Policy moving bilateral agreements beyond trade
Still, not the “United States of Europe”
States guard their sovereignty in many key areas:
Taxes and spending (EU budget tiny).
Little EU legislation in key areas including education, health, the social safety net.
Small central institutions, rely on state institutions for implementation of EU rules.
Far from developing a truly unified foreign and defense policy.
An enlarging Union: from 6 to 27
1951/57: Benelux, Italy, France, Germany
1973: United Kingdom, Ireland, Denmark
1981-86: Greece, Spain, Portugal
1995: Sweden, Austria, Finland
2004: “big bang”– eight countries in Central and Eastern Europe plus Malta and Cyprus
2007: Bulgaria and Romania
Future enlargements
population EU 27 = 501 million
Croatia, Macedonia, Turkey are candidates
Serbia, Bosnia, Montenegro, Kosovo, Albania, Iceland
Impact of successive enlargements (1958-2007)
1958 1973 1981 1986 1995 2004 2007 US NC
Area (1000km) 1,167 1,524 1,658 2,252 3,234 3,892 4,343 9,631 139
Population (millions) 185 273 287 338 370 457 501 300 9.4
Member States 6 9 10 12 15 25 27 50 100
OfficialLanguages 4 6 7 9 11 20 22 1 1
MEPs 142 198 434 518 626 732 736 435+6 170
GDP/capita in Purchasing Power Parity
$40,558 The Netherlands
$36,358 United Kingdom
$35,539 Germany
$34,205 France$12,600 Romania
USA $47,440
Canada $39,098
Mexico $14,534
Source: IMF figures for 2008
I. War experience
World War I: ≈20 million dead
World War II: ≈70 million dead
Nationalism: the most deadly force in human history
II. Constraining Germany
How was France to deal with Germany?“I could see only one solution: we must bind ourselves inextricably to Germany in a common undertaking in which our other neighbors could join.”
Jean Monnet, First High Commissioner of the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC)
Churchill calls for a “United States of Europe”
European integration is necessary for future peace.
The UK would not participate.
Franco-German cooperation at the core.
… What is this sovereign remedy? It is to recreate the European Family or as much of it as we can and provide it with a structure under which it can dwell in peace, in safety and freedom. We must build a kind of United States of Europe…
Zurich, 19 Sept 1946
The Schuman Declaration European Coal & Steel Community
Europe will not be made all at once, or according to a single plan . . . . Franco-German production of coal and steel as a whole be placed under a common High Authority . . . .. as a first step in the federation of Europe.
The solidarity in production thus established will make it plain that any war between France and Germany becomes not merely unthinkable, but materially impossible. . . . .
Robert Schuman, 9 May 1950
How can war be averted?
Building a web of rules
European Coal and Steel Community (1951)
European Defense Community (1954)
European Economic Community (1957)
III. The Cold War
End of Western European great powers. End of imperial rivalries.
Now bigger threat - the Soviet Union
Communist threat within highlights need for economic recovery (esp. France and Italy)
US support for European integration Marshall Plan as an extension of Truman Doctrine
IV. Benefits of integration & multi-level governance Large = efficient Small = beautiful
Single market - eliminating trade barriers comparative advantage / benefits of
specialization economies of scale
Spillover: single competition authority single currency
International economic bargaining power
Budget– Revenues (%)
VAT=Value-added tax (equivalent of sales tax)GNI=Gross National Income (richer countries pay larger share)Traditional own resources=customs and excise taxes, agricultural leviesOther= e.g. fines, taxes paid by employees, third country contributions
Ceiling =1.24%
of EU GDP (293 Euro/citizen)
2010: 142 billion Euro
Budget
37%
34%
10%
4%
5%
5%5%
cohesion policy
agriculture
rural development
research
administration
external relations
other
Social security
$2,980 billion (expenditures)18.8% of US GDP (revenues)
€129 billion = $168 billion (expenditures)
1.1% of EU GDP (revenues)
US spending (2008)
18%
EU spending (2008)
US Separation of Powers
Presidency + Fed bureaucracy
Senate House of Representatives
LEGISLATION
Presidential veto
Supreme Court
Federal Reserve
EU Separation of PowersEuropean
Commission
Council of Ministers
European Parliament
European Council
EU LAWS
LEGISLATIVE PROPOSAL
LEGISLATIVEPROPOSAL
European Court of Justice
European Central Bank
National parliaments
HRFA
The Commission is the institution that represents the general interests of the Community.
Epitomizes supranationalism“Engineer of European integration”Ultimate scapegoatThe once powerful Presidency Policy entrepreneur, honest broker, manager of decisions taken by others, motor of integration?
Barroso, President of Commission
Berlaymont, seat of the Commission
Commission
• Currently 27 commissioners; serve 5-year terms.
Tend to be individuals of high political stature.
Headed by President of the Commission (Barroso).
Nomination: both President and the College are selected by the European Council by QMV and confirmed by the EP.
College of commissioners
Barroso II Commission
European Council
• Represents national interests.
Most intergovernmental body in the EU.
Consists of all 27 Heads of State or Government and the Commission President.
Formal institution with Lisbon Treaty
Presidency: rotates every 6 months.
Meets 4 times a year.
The European Council shall provide the Union with the necessary impetus for its development and shall define the general political guidelines thereof.
President of Council, Herman von Rompuy
Council of the European UnionSector-specific Councils
Relevant ministers from various MSs
Chaired by the MS currently holding the Presidency
Commission represented by relevant Commissioner(s)
About 75 meetings per year
European ParliamentThe European Parliament is the institution
which represents the peoples of the states brought together in the Community.
• Only directly elected supranational assembly with significant powers.
Constant struggle for legitimacy and power since its inception.
EU institution with worst image.
Composition of EP
Currently 736 MEPs.
Seats distributed to MSs based roughly on population. Smaller MSs over-represented.
Elected every 5 yrs based on national rules.
“Union citizens” can vote and stand for elections in their country
of residence (as of Maastricht).
Political groups
Members of the seventh European Parliament
European People’s Party (265) Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (184) Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe (84) European Greens–European Free Alliance (55) European Conservatives and Reformists (54) European United Left–Nordic Green Left (35) Europe of Freedom and Democracy (32) Non-Inscrits (27)
EP President , Jerzy Buzek,
The ECJ ensures that in the interpretation and application of the TEC the law is
observed. It represents the rule of law.
Structure Sits in Luxembourg 27 judges (one from each MS); 6-year renewable terms.
Sources of EU law treaties EU legislation (regulations, directives, decisions) international law general principles of law (e.g. rule of law, proportionality) jurisprudence
European Court of Justice