Introduction to Group Work 2
description
Transcript of Introduction to Group Work 2
![Page 1: Introduction to Group Work 2](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022083006/56813c30550346895da5b00a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1Emerging Disease Surveillance and Response (ESR)WHO Western Pacific Regional Office (WPRO)
Introduction to Group Work 2
Summary of Seasonal Influenza
in the WPR
Virological review
![Page 2: Introduction to Group Work 2](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022083006/56813c30550346895da5b00a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2Emerging Disease Surveillance and Response (ESR)WHO Western Pacific Regional Office (WPRO)
Group Work 2Group D
Grand Ballroom
Anne-Claire GourinatJean Paul Grangeon
Sue HuangVito Roque
Remigio OlvedaJuan Lopez
Nobuhiko OkabePrem Sanjeev Singh
Harpal SinghWilina LimAnn Moen
Emma Denehy
![Page 3: Introduction to Group Work 2](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022083006/56813c30550346895da5b00a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3Emerging Disease Surveillance and Response (ESR)WHO Western Pacific Regional Office (WPRO)
Overall Comments • Many challenges noted which has resulted in the objectives of
the review changing• The time period is too short to determine seasonality, particularly
with the pandemic• Care needs to be taken not misrepresent countries/areas by
being too generalised – countries/areas with small data sets are not being represented (see results
for more information)– Tropics – no distinct seasonality except for a few countries
• Need to create the paper with focus on public health significance (not publication) – at least to stimulate thinking of a regional goal and moving forward
• Start with a WPRO map, define NH, Tropics and SH
![Page 4: Introduction to Group Work 2](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022083006/56813c30550346895da5b00a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4Emerging Disease Surveillance and Response (ESR)WHO Western Pacific Regional Office (WPRO)
Results Section• Consider getting another two year worth of data (2006-
2007) or more, if feasible• Look at each predominate virus separately by type by
zone• Put ILI and laboratory confirmed data on the same
graph• If the purpose is for vaccine recommendation, include
antigenic strains by zones – Discussion could then concentrate on matching circulating
strain with vaccine match – if they don’t match, look into how this can improved in the future.
![Page 5: Introduction to Group Work 2](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022083006/56813c30550346895da5b00a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5Emerging Disease Surveillance and Response (ESR)WHO Western Pacific Regional Office (WPRO)
Results
• Use % of positivity rather than number of positive cases
• Map to show antigenic strains and how they move, year by year in the region
• Include data on antiviral susceptibly, sequence/genetic data, antigenic information, hospital based ARI admissions and mortality
![Page 6: Introduction to Group Work 2](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022083006/56813c30550346895da5b00a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6Emerging Disease Surveillance and Response (ESR)WHO Western Pacific Regional Office (WPRO)
Discussion Section• How we can use the data and lessons learnt • Paper is challenging, however there is value is
presenting it as a region (with regional goal/vision of 201X in mind)– Use paper to put forward recommendations for
future data improvements• Perhaps annual NIC reports using a standardized format,
after 5 years it is easy to report on this information• Templates and harmonised case definitions will assist data
collection