Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural...

57
Introduction Modern Methods in Heterogeneous Catalysis F.C. Jentoft, October 21, 2005

Transcript of Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural...

Page 1: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Introduction

Modern Methods in Heterogeneous CatalysisF.C. Jentoft, October 21, 2005

Page 2: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Literature

G.A. Somorjai: Introduction to surface chemistry and catalysis, Wiley New York [u.a.] 1994

Jens Hagen: Technische Katalyse: eine Einführung, VCh Weinheim 1996

B.C. Gates: Catalytic Chemistry, John Wiley & Sons, New York 1997

G. Ertl, H. Knözinger, J. Weitkamp, [Eds.]: Handbook of heterogeneous catalysis: VCh Weinheim 1997

J.M. Thomas, W.J. Thomas: Principles and practice of heterogeneous catalysis, Weinheim [u.a.] VCh 1997

B. Cornils, W.A. Herrmann, R. Schlögl, C.-H. Wong (Eds.): Catalysis from A to Z, Wiley-VCh Weinheim 2000

R.I. Masel: Chemical kinetics and catalysis, Wiley-Interscience New York [u.a.] 2001

J.W. Niemantsverdriet: Spectroscopy in Catalysis, Wiley-VCh Weinheim 2002

James F. Haw (Ed.): In-Situ Spectroscopy in Heterogeneous Catalysis, Wiley-VCh Weinheim 2002

I. Chorkendorff, J.W. Niemantsverdriet: Concepts of Modern Catalysis and Kinetics, Wiley-VCh Weinheim 2003

Page 3: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Catalysis Definition – First Description

Berzelius’ Ideas of “Catalytic Power“ (1835) v the ability of substances "to awaken affinities,

which are asleep at a particular temperature, by their mere presence and not by their own affinity"

v used to explain conversion of starch to sugar by acid, hydrogen peroxide decomposition by metals, conversion of ethanol to acetic acid by Pt

v chose "catalysis" in analogy to "analysis"v stated that

catalysis was more common than believed,part of inorganic and organic nature,in living plants and animals thousands of catalytic processes may proceed

M.W. Roberts, Catalysis Lett. 67,1 (2000) G. Ertl and T. Gloyna, Z. Phys. Chem. 217 (2003) 1207-1219

Jöns Jakob Berzelius(1779–1848)

Page 4: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Reactions on Berzelius’ “Catalytic Power”

Liebig to Wöhler, June 2, 1837:

Weisst Du denn nicht, dass die Esel, welche in Deutschland Bücherschreiben, seine [Berzelius] katalytische Kraft ohne zu prüfen, annehmenund unsern Kindern in den Kopf setzen werden, weil sie bequem und die Faulheit begünstigend ist?

Don’t you know that the idiots who write books in Germany will adopt his [Berzelius’] catalytic power without scrutinization, and will teach it to our children because it [the catalytic power] is convenient and favors the laziness?

Berzelius und Liebig, Ihre Briefe von 1831-1845, Hrsg. T. Reschke, WiSoMed 1978, Göttingen

Page 5: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Catalysis Definition

Ostwald’s Definition of Catalysis (1894)

v "catalysis is the acceleration of a slowly proceeding chemical reaction through the presence of a foreign substance"

v "the acceleration occurs without a change of the energetic situation"

v "at the end of the reaction the foreign substance can be considered as removed"

Stohmann, Z. Biol. 31 (1894) 364-391W. Ostwald, Z. Phys. Chem. 15 (1894) 705-706G. Ertl and T. Gloyna, Z. Phys. Chem. 217 (2003) 1207-1219N.I Rodnyj, Ju.I. Solowjew, Wilhelm Ostwald, Teubner, Leipzig 1977.

Page 6: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Modern Catalysis Picture

Reactants

Products

EA

no catalyst

Reaction coordinate

Reactants

Products

EA

catalyst

Reaction coordinate

v Thermodynamics of reaction remain unchangedv Catalyst influences reaction rate by changing the reaction coordinate

and the nature of transition states or intermediates

Page 7: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Types of Catalysis

v Biocatalysiscatalyzed reactions where the catalyst is an enzyme

v Homogeneous catalysiscatalysis with the catalyst in the same phase as the reactant

v Heterogeneous catalysis1) catalysis with the catalyst in a different phase than the reactants, and 2) with the catalyst on solid, porous material or impregnated in such material

Page 8: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Biocatalysis (Nov.4, 2005)

v Enzymes as catalystshighly efficient, i.e. very fast and very selective!mild conditions (T, p)… but also very sensitive (T,pH)

OHOOH 2222 22 +→catalase

Rate: 107 molecules/s

Catalyst Ea/ kJ*mol-1None 73iodide ion 54Pt surface 46iron(III) 40Catalase 4

Page 9: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Homogeneous Catalysis (Feb. 17, 2006)

Homogeneous catalysis helps with understanding! Ideas can be transferred from solution chemistry to surface chemistry (e.g. in acid catalysis, 18.2.05)

Page 10: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Heterogeneous Catalysis

Advantages

v easy separation of product and catalysts

v high catalyst lifetimes

v particularly acid catalysis: fewer corrosion and disposal problems

v ca. 80 % of industrial catalytic processes are heterogeneous

Applicationsv production of chemicalsv cleaning of waste and exhaust gas streams (environmental catalysis)v energy conversion (fuel cells)

Page 11: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Largest Processes in Heterogeneous Catalysis

Page 12: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Catalysis: A Multidisciplinary Problem

1. Physical Chemistry

v Thermodynamics of target reaction

v Kinetics

v Analytical techniques(e.g. spectroscopy)

A, B

A

2. Organic and Inorganic Chemistry

v Reactants

v Catalysts

3. Reaction Engineering

v Reactors, catalyst formulation

4. Theoretical Chemistry

5. Physics

6. Biosciences (enzymes)

Page 13: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Partial vs. Total Oxidation

v Oxidation of propene to acrolein

ΔrH° = -427 kJ mol-1

v Oxidation of acrolein to CO2

ΔcH° = -1633 kJ mol-1

Reactants

Partial Oxidation Product

EEA

Reaction coordinate

Total Oxidation Products

EA

)(2)(3)(5.3)( 22243 gOHgCOgOgOHC +→+

OHOHCOHC 243263 21 +→+

need to control reaction temperature

Page 14: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

HCN Synthesis

v BMA or Degussa process:

ΔrH° = + 256 kJ mol-1

runs at 1300°C, process needs large amount of energy

ΔrH° = - 474 kJ mol-1

v Andrussow process

)(3)()(5.1)()( 2234 gOHgHCNgOgNHgCH +→++

Both possibilities (oxidative/non-ox.) may be feasible

)(3)()()( 234 gHgHCNgNHgCH +→+

Page 15: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

v Isomerization of butane

ΔrH° = - 7 kJ mol-1

ΔrS° = -15 J mol-1

ΔrG°= - 2.3 kJ mol-1

Isomerization

Start your research by calculating the thermodynamics of your reaction!

∆H = const.

0102030405060708090

100

200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700

Temperature / K

Frac

tion

%

Isobutane

n -Butane)()( 104104 gHCigHCn −↔−

Page 16: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Kinetics: Rate Equations

v With r the reaction rate in units of mol/l per time

v With a,b,c, the individual reaction order with respect to a particular reactant and the total reaction order n the sum of the exponents

v With [A], [B], [C] the reactant concentrations

v Typical rate equation:

...][][][ cba CBAkr =

v With k the rate constant in units of min-1 for a first order reaction, for higher orders in inverse units of concentration in different powers

−−

11min

n

moll

Page 17: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Rates in Heterogeneous Catalysis

v Rate with respect to mass or surface area of the catalyst

catalystgmol

min

surfacecatalystm

mol2min

Page 18: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

How to Derive a Rate Equation I

2 C2H5OH C2H5-O-C2H5 + H2OH+

Page 19: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

How to Derive a Rate Equation II

Page 20: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

How to Derive a Rate Equation III

Page 21: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Temperature Dependence of Rate Constant

v Once a rate equation has been established, a rate constant can be calculated

v The rate constant is temperature dependent

v There are three different ways to derive this relation:Arrhenius TheoryCollision Theory Transition State Theory (Eyring)

Page 22: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Arrhenius Theory

BAk1

k-12

lnRT

HT

Kp

∆=

∂∂

van’t Hoff’s Equation

211 lnln

RTH

Tk

Tk ∆

=

∂∂

∂∂ −

211ln

RTE

Tk

=

∂∂

211ln

RTE

Tk −− =

∂∂ HEE ∆=− −11

1

1

=kkK

Page 23: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Arrhenius Theory

v With E the apparent activation energy in kJ mol-1

A the frequency factor

v Plot of ln k vs. 1/T gives a slope of -EA/R which allows the calculation of the activation energy

v A rule of thumb: the rate doubles for 10 K rise in temperature

RTEAk A−= lnln

Page 24: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Example for Arrhenius Plot

2 different slopes may indicate change in mechanismor change from reaction to diffusion control

Page 25: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

What Kinetics Will (Not) Deliver…

v Reaction rates

v Rate equation / reaction order

v Rate constant

v Apparent activation energies

v Will not deliver a mechanism…..

v But any mechanism we think of should be consistent with the kinetic data….

Page 26: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Catalyst Characteristics: Activity

v activity is vague term, better: rate constants

A, BA

A, BA

Page 27: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Conversion

A, BA

Conversion X (in %)

v the fraction of the reactant(s) that has been converted

OHOHCOHC 243263 21 +→+

v there can be conversion with respect to different reactants, e.g. oxidation reactions

Page 28: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Selectivity

v ratio of rates

v extremely important: unconverted reactant can be recycled – a valuable reactant converted to unwanted side products is lost!

Selectivity S (in %)

v e.g. moles of desired product/moles of all products

A, B, CA

Page 29: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Yield

Yield Y (in%)

v the product of X and S

Space Time Yield (STY)v differently defined for continuous and discontinuous operationv continuous process:

(feed x conversion x selectivity)/(reactor volume x time)v discontinuous process:

(input x conversion x selectivity)/(reactor volume x time of reaction)

Page 30: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Catalyst Characteristics: Stability

v rate of deactivation

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

50

100

150

200

2500.5% MnSZ

Rat

e of

isom

eriz

atio

n / µ

mol

g-1h

-1

Time on stream / h

500 mg cat. 1 kPa n-C4, 338 K

Page 31: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

50

100

150

200 n-Butane isomerization of 2.0 MnSZ

activation in O2

regeneration in O2R

ate

of is

omer

izat

ion

/ µm

ol g

-1h

-1

Time / h

2. regeneration in O2

Catalyst Characteristics: Regenerability

v e.g. cracking catalysts in refineries are constantly regenerated in separate recycle reactor

Page 32: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Reaction Engineering

v Reactor type (Feb. 17, 2006) and catalyst formulation, reaction conditions

Page 33: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Catalyst Formulations

extrudates

three-way converter

NOx catalyst, stationary power plants

Page 34: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Example Three-Way Converter

Page 35: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Monolith + Washcoat

v Pt/Rh on washcoated monolith

Close-up view of ceramic monolithic support with62 cells/cm2

Close-up view of a channel of a washcoated ceramic ceramic monolithic

Page 36: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Washcoat Dimensional Details

washcoat secondary particle washcoat primary particle

washcoat meso and micropores

precious metal particle

ceramicmonolith

washcoatsecondary particle

washcoatmacropore

1 µm

20 µm

50 µ

m

1000

µm

100 µm

150 µm

ceramic monolith washcoat

Page 37: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Transmission electron microscopic image of precious metals on a washcoatparticle

Images of Washcoat

Scanning electron microscopic image of a washcoat layer

Page 38: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Minimal Number of Reaction Steps in Heterogeneous Catalysis

1. Adsorption of reactant on catalyst surface

AB

2. Reaction

3. Desorption of products from catalyst surface

Page 39: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Reaction Steps in Heterogeneous Catalysis

2. Adsorption of reactant on catalyst surface

AB

3. Reaction

4. Desorption of products from catalyst surface

5. Diffusion of products away from catalystA

1. Diffusion of reactant to catalyst

B

Page 40: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Reaction Steps in Heterogeneous Catalysis

AB

A

B

v film diffusion (total of 7 steps)v diffusion can become rate-limiting!v diffusion: Dec. 2, 2005

Page 41: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Understanding a Catalyst: Breaking Down the Problem

Catalystformulation

structural complexitychemical complexity

“Active material”

Page 42: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Examples: Structural & Chemical Complexity

v precious metals are supported to increase active metal surface areav which facets are exposedv TEM: Oct. 28, 2005v surface and bulk structure (Nov. 4 & 11, 2005)

transmission electron microscopy: Rh/SiO2

Page 43: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Breaking Down the Problem

Catalystformulation

structural complexitychemical complexity

“Active material”

reduce structural and/or chemical complexitydemonstrate validity of model

2-dimensional models / flat surfacessingle crystals of metals, oxide layers

cluster modelssupported on single/polycrystalline material

Model systems (examples)(Nov. 18, 2005 & Jan. 6, 2006)

metal foil

.

.

.

STM: Pt (111)image: IBM

Page 44: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Role in Catalysis? Structure Sensitivity!

v also: ammonia synthesis (reactions involving C-C, N-N bond breaking)

C2H6 + H2 2 CH4

v rate per exposed metal surface area is a function of the metal particle size / the exposed facet plane

v active site an ensemble of atoms

v example: the hydrogenolysis of ethane

Page 45: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Structure Sensitivity

Page 46: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Structure Insensitivity (1969)

v rate per exposed metal surface area is NOT a function of the metal particle size

v active site 1-2 atoms

v example: the hydrogenation of cyclohexene

+ H2

M. Boudart et al., Adv. Catal. 20 (1969) 153-177

Page 47: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Concept of Active Sites

Hugh Stott Taylor 1925

v “only a small fraction of the surface is active”

v “the amount of surface which is catalytically active is determined by the reaction catalyzed”

H.S. Taylor, Proc. Roy. Soc. A108 (1925) 105-111

Page 48: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Questions:Type? Number / density?„Strength“ (interaction with a certain molecule)?

Examples for Surface Sites

Metal sites

Brønsted-sites

Lewis-sites

Page 49: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Oxide Surfaces

v can be terminated by O or Mx+ or mixture (may depend on environment)

v can be terminated by foreign ions

v most frequently surfaces feature OH groups:

HO

Zr

HO

Zr….Zr

HO

Zr..Zr..Zr

type I type II type III

v zeolite OH groups inside the poresHO

Si Al

OH groups can beBrønsted acids = proton donorsBrønsted bases = proton acceptors

Page 50: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Detection of OH-Groups

v IR spectroscopy, NMR spectroscopy

v band position or chemical shift delivers information

4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000

0

10

20

30

40

50

161216

32

1625

2119

2040

1379

1257

2118

2036

1934

H4PVMo

11O

40Cs

2H

2PVMo

11O

40Cs

3HPVMo

11O

40Cs

4PVMo

11O

40

Tran

smitt

ance

(%)

Wavenumbers / cm-1

CaF2window

absorption

Page 51: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Lewis-sites coordinatively unsaturated (cus) metal cations (acidic, electron pair acceptors)oxygen anions (basic, electron pair donors)

Lewis Sites

v note: on a surface, acidic and basic sites (Brønsted and/or Lewis) can coexist (would neutralize each other in solution)

v only detectable in an adsorption experiment

Page 52: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

OH O

H NHH

HIR, XPS, NMR, UV/Vis...shift of bands(probe/surface)desorption T

TDS/TPD

adsorption ∆ Hcalorimetry

+ NH3

Probing Sites by Chemisorption

Different methods to follow adsorption (Nov. 18, 2005 ) deliver different information

v Isotherms: number of sitesv Spectroscopies: type, strength (but not number unless extinction

coefficient known)v Calorimetry (Dec. 2, 2005) , TDS (Nov. 25, 2005): number and strength

(but not type)

Page 53: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Turn Over Frequency (1966)

v Rate with respect to number of active sites

low site density high site density

v Turnover frequency (TOF) is the number of molecules formed per active site per second (in a stage of saturation with reactant, i.e. a zero order reaction with respect to the reactant)

[ ]1−=

sssite

molecules

M. Boudart et al., J. Catal. 6 (1966) 92

Page 54: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

TOF, TON, Catalysis

v TONTotal number of product formed molecules per active siteTON= TOF*catalyst life time

v TON = 1 stoichiometric reactionTON ≥ 102 catalytic reactionTON = 106-107 industrial application

v TON origins from enzyme kinetics, definitions vary

Page 55: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Examples for TOFs

Page 56: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Catalyst Synthesis

Catalyst Transformation ExamplesMetals hydrogenation, dehydrogenation Fe, Ni, Pt, Ag, RuSemiconducting oxidation NiO, ZnOoxides mixed oxides

Insulating dehydration Al2O3, SiO2, MgOoxidesAcids polymerization, isomerization HF, H3PO4, H2SO4,

cracking, alkylation SiO2/ Al2O3,zeolites

catalysts are developed empirically (trial and error)with input from experience

Page 57: Introduction - FHIstructural complexity chemical complexity “Active material” reduce structural and/or chemical complexity demonstrate validity of model 2-dimensional models

Catalysis Research: Motivation

Fundamental understanding

v active site

v reaction mechanism

knowledge-derived catalyst synthesis

Targeted synthesisv Goal: once active structure is known synthesis can be targeted