Intro to IP Class of November 19 2003 Trademark Dilution, Cybersquatting, False Advertising.
-
Upload
philippa-mccormick -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Intro to IP Class of November 19 2003 Trademark Dilution, Cybersquatting, False Advertising.
![Page 1: Intro to IP Class of November 19 2003 Trademark Dilution, Cybersquatting, False Advertising.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697c01d1a28abf838cd03f0/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Intro to IP
Class of November 19 2003
Trademark Dilution, Cybersquatting, False Advertising
![Page 2: Intro to IP Class of November 19 2003 Trademark Dilution, Cybersquatting, False Advertising.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697c01d1a28abf838cd03f0/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Dilution: Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc. (2003) Supp 7
• What is trademark dilution and what’s the rationale for it?
• What was the Circuit split that the U.S. Supreme Court had to resolve in this case?
![Page 3: Intro to IP Class of November 19 2003 Trademark Dilution, Cybersquatting, False Advertising.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697c01d1a28abf838cd03f0/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
FTDA (15 U.S.C. § 1125(c))
• Protects famous/distinctive marks only (see factors at (c)(1))
• From dilution of the distinctive quality of the mark (see s. 1127)
• Injunctive relief only unless willful intention to trade on owner’s reputation or to cause dilution of famous mark
• Exceptions : fair use in comparative commercial advertising to ID competing goods/services, noncommercial use of a mark, news reporting/news commentary
![Page 4: Intro to IP Class of November 19 2003 Trademark Dilution, Cybersquatting, False Advertising.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697c01d1a28abf838cd03f0/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Circuit Split
• Was on what P must prove under the FTDA
• Objective proof of actual injury to economic value of a famous mark?
• Actual loss of sales or profits?• Presumption of harm (likelihood of
dilution)?
![Page 5: Intro to IP Class of November 19 2003 Trademark Dilution, Cybersquatting, False Advertising.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697c01d1a28abf838cd03f0/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Problem 5-7 CB p. 643
• Does LEXUS for a luxury car dilute the registered trademark LEXIS for a legal/business electronic database?
![Page 6: Intro to IP Class of November 19 2003 Trademark Dilution, Cybersquatting, False Advertising.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697c01d1a28abf838cd03f0/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Problem 5-7 CB p. 643
• Does LEXUS for a luxury car dilute the registered trademark LEXIS for a legal/business electronic database? Problem is based on Mead Data Central v. Toyota Motor Sales, 875 F.2d 1026 (2d Cir. 1989) (pre-FTDA case decided on New York state dilution law)
![Page 7: Intro to IP Class of November 19 2003 Trademark Dilution, Cybersquatting, False Advertising.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697c01d1a28abf838cd03f0/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Problem 5-8 – CB p. 647 – use of logos outside the corporate
context• What hurdles will
TM owners have to clear to enforce their rights? Are there any risks in letting the practice continue? Do PMC/customers have a defense not based in TM law?
![Page 8: Intro to IP Class of November 19 2003 Trademark Dilution, Cybersquatting, False Advertising.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022083009/5697c01d1a28abf838cd03f0/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Domain Names and Cybersquattiing
• What’s a domain name?
• What’s cybersquatting
• Compare the ACPA to the UDRP