Intra- Industry Rivalry Strategic Business Unit How strong is the rivalry among existing players?...
-
Upload
oswald-york -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
2
Transcript of Intra- Industry Rivalry Strategic Business Unit How strong is the rivalry among existing players?...
Intra-Industry Rivalry
Strategic Business Unit
How strong is the rivalry among existing players? Does only one player dominate?
BargainingPower of the
Buyers
How strong is the position of the buyers? Can we sell
in large volumes? Do we need to discount heavily?
How easy or hard it is for new entrants to start and compete? Any barriers to their
entry?Potential New Entrants
How easy or hard it is for a new product or service to replace what already exists?
Substitute Products and Services
Bargaining Power of Suppliers
How strong is the position of the suppliers? Are there many? Few? Monopoly?
Porter’s model of 5 competitive forces is one of the most often used business strategy tools
Source: Michael E. Porter “Forces Governing Competition in Industry (Harvard Business Review, Mar.-Apr. 1979)
Porter’s Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy
www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYF2_FBCvXw
http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/alabaster/A583120 Porter’s Competitive Forces
Michael Porter on why America needs an economic strategy
Generic Strategies and Industry Forces
IndustryForce
Generic Strategies
Cost Leadership
Differentiation Focus
EntryBarriers
Ability to cut price in retaliation deters potential entrants.
Customer loyalty can discourage potential entrants.
Focusing develops core competencies that can act as an entry barrier.
BuyerPower
Ability to offer lower price to powerful buyers.
Large buyers have less power to negotiate because of few close alternatives.
Large buyers have less power to negotiate because of few alternatives.
SupplierPower
Better insulated from powerful suppliers.
Better able to pass on supplier price increases to customers.
Suppliers have power because of low volumes, but a differentiation-focused firm is better able to pass on supplier price increases.
Threat ofSubstitutes
Can use low price to defend against substitutes.
Customer's become attached to differentiating attributes, reducing threat of substitutes.
Specialized products & core competency protect against substitutes.
Rivalry Better able to compete on price.
Brand loyalty to keep customers from rivals.
Rivals cannot meet differentiation-focused customer needs.
Applying the Porter Competitive Model Applying the Porter Competitive Model to Wal-Martto Wal-Mart
Intra-Industry RivalrySBU: Wal-MartRivals: Kmart, Target,Toys R Us, Specialty Stores
BargainingPower of Buyers
Bargaining Power
of Suppliers
Substitute Products
and Services
PotentialNew Entrants
Consumers in Small Town U.S.A.
Consumers in the Metropolitans Areas in the U.S.
Canadian and Mexican Consumers
Other Foreign Consumers
Mail Order Home Shopping Network Electronic Shopping
U.S. Product Manufacturers Foreign Manufacturers Local Governments I/T Product and Service
Suppliers
Foreign General Merchandisers or Discounters
Established Retailer Shifting Strategy to Discounting or Megastores
Telemarketing Buying Clubs Door-to-door Sales
Porter Competitive ModelEducation Industry: U.S. Universities
Intra-Industry RivalryStrategic Business Unit
BargainingPower of Buyers
Bargaining Power
of Suppliers
Substitute Products
and Services
PotentialNew Entrants
Faculty and Staff Equipment, Service,
Suppliers Alumni Foundations, Business Government Books and Videotapes
Computer-Based Training Training Companies Consulting Firms
Students Parents Business Employers Legislators
Foreign Universities Distance Learning Motorola University Phoenix, DeVry, National
Porter’s Model and the Role of the Government:
The government plays an important role in Porter’s diamond model. Like everybody else, Porter argues that there are some things that governments do that they shouldn't, and other things that they do not do but should. He says, "Government’s proper role is as a catalyst and challenger; it is to encourage - or even push - companies to raise their aspirations and move to higher levels of competitive performance …"
Governments can influence all four of Porter’s determinants through a variety of actions such as
– Subsidies to firms, either directly (money) or indirectly (through infrastructure).
– Tax codes applicable to corporation, business or property ownership.– Educational policies that affect the skill level of workers.– They should focus on specialized factor creation. (How can they do this?)– They should enforce tough standards. (This prescription may seem
counterintuitive. What is his rationale? Maybe to establish high technical and product standards including environmental regulations.)
The problem, of course, is through these actions, it becomes clear which industries they are choosing to help innovate. What methods do they use to choose? What happens if they pick the wrong industries?
Criticisms Although Porter theory is renowned, it has a number of critics.
Porter developed this paper based on case studies and these tend to only apply to developed economies.
Porter argues that only outward-FDI is valuable in creating competitive advantage, and inbound-FDI does not increase domestic competition significantly because the domestic firms lack the capability to defend their own markets and face a process of market-share erosion and decline. However, there seems to be little empirical evidence to support that claim.
The Porter model does not adequately address the role of MNCs. There seems to be ample evidence that the diamond is influenced by factors outside the home country.