Internet and the city
-
Upload
yulya-besplemennova -
Category
Design
-
view
431 -
download
0
Transcript of Internet and the city
Internet and the CityHybrid Spaces + Fieldwork
by Yulya Besplemennova
for MATING URBANISM
13/01/2016
If you do not care about networks, the networks will care about you, anyway. For as long as you want to live in society, at this time and in this place, you will have to deal with the network society. Because we live in the Internet galaxy.Manuel Castells (2001) Internet Galaxy, p. 282
Technology doesn’t happen in the vaccuum!!!
new tech appears as a response to some advanced demands
it’s being adapted by general society and influences it
What distinguishes cyberspace, and in particular the Internet, has been the speed of diffusion and growth...
1. Internet is the most rapidly growing means of telecommunication
2. It is hyper-social and brings together all the previous formats of communication
3. Now it is also mobile - therefore out in the streets of the cities
Social Effects of the Internet
Despite many concerns active users of the Internet are also more active in the offline communication.
Research shows no single Internet effect.
Cyberspace vs. Public Space
Local community “Little boxes” Glocalization
Person-to-person networks Person-to-things networks
Just like in old times Homer likes to meet his friends at Moe’s while Marge is actively participating in church community.
However real contemporary family’s anchor is their living room connected to global world by TV-news and telephone.
Unlike her parents Lisa finds like-minded friends in different places using the Internet. (She also likes playing poker there.)
Despite his love to TV Homer tries all new de-vices and they’re changing his relations to others. (Though it’s still unclear whether something will make him spend more time outdoors)
With the development of Internet of Things and AI technologies we get closer to in-volvement of real non-human agents into the networks
Time vs. Space
It generally appears that physical space doesn’t matter anymore with the portable cyber-spaces that follows us everywhere.
“Where are you?”“Can you talk now?”is not relevant anymore
“One must not overlook the fact that people still live in a material world and require food, shelter and human contact. In cases where services can be decentralised, they still have to locate in areas of suitable skilled labour and conventional transport links. In other words, although ICTs work to destroy space–time relations, to render social relations ‘spaceless’, other spatial practices, forms and forces resist and work against this attrition. Consequently, we are witnessing simultaneous pressures of spatial fragmentation (decentralisation) and unity (centralisation)… Indeed, a complex interplay between local and global forces exists as some places use and develop their localism, their uniqueness, to try and attract visitors and business.”
Besides the pure pragmatism of production and consumption
processes, also emotional bonds to places and their social aspects
are important. In “Place and Placelessness”, Relph explores the
relationship between people and places. He posits that there is a
powerful relationship between the two, to the extent that
“people are their place and a place is its people”.
1. Places become less authentic with globalisation
2. People travel more and lose connection to places that they used to have
3. Wherever you’re you can access the same virtual “places” on internet and connect to your community
The Internet and Public Realm
“The proportion of copresent others in the public realm is dramatically in favor of the unfamiliar and leans toward a diversity of interests, behaviors, and beliefs rather than to the familiar or the homophilous.”
“The public realm can provide a provocative, potentially disruptive, and contested setting that, although incomplete, is an important com-ponent of public deliberation in an increasingly shrinking public sphere.”
Hertzian spaceOn basic physical level any wireless connection is made of electromagnetic waves. They set specific constraints which should be understood for the best user experience
“All electronic products are hybrids of radiation and matter” - so are the spaces
How are the public spaces in Milan?
Who are the users?
What are they doing there?
What do they need to connect?
How’s the existing offers in connection to city ge-ography and users?
What’s the first-hand experience of those offers?
What do users think of them?
Who are the most promising or extreme users in need?
What’s local specificity?
Does existing connection change some public spaces and how?
Field Observations/ Research Questions:
Some of routes taken in the city during research observations:
ATM
90, 91
shops
cafès
metro entrances
flowersshop
drinkingfountain
Gromicecream
Isola Digitale
bench+tree
newsstand
McDonald’s
BikeMi
=
Mo 14/10 9:00
We 9/10 13:30
We 16/10 16:30
Tu 8/10 16:50
Th 3/10 17:50
Th 3/10 18:50 Sat 5/10 19:28
Sat 19/10 18:00
Sun 20/10 13:08
Sun 13/10 17:30
Superposition of different time layers makes it evident which spots are more popular than others
Usage Comparison
Monday morning — almost empty square with several strangely behav-ing people
Teens gather here after school pre-ferring to stay around McDonald’s and BikeMi corner
On sunny days there is always line of people in front of Grom and benches are occupied then by icecream eaters ^_^
During lunch benches are full with people taking food away
Use on weekdays
Mo 14/10 9:00 We 9/10 13:30 We 16/10 16:30 Th 3/10 17:50
Use on weekends
Saturday afternoon is very active time for this square, especially many teenagers in their regular part
Elderly is gathering here as well, coming to meet even from other neighborhoods as they love to stay at lively place
Even in the “empty” moments like Sunday lunch time there are groups of immigrants staying for long time in the square together
On pedestrian day at Corso Buenos Aires a lot of people were enjoying activity outdoors, but mostly passing by
Sat 5/10 19:28Sat 19/10 18:00 Sun 20/10 13:08 Sun 13/10 17:30
Teenagers just like sitting on the shared bikes instead of benches
People tend to use their phones when waiting for someone in the square
Many tourists pass by here resting or looking for directions to explore the city center
Groups of immigrants can spend many hours in this square
When waiting for someone people stay reading even after dark under newsstand lights
Local elderly likes to spend time here as the place is full of people and is very lively
Even after the rain place is soon getting populated with people using newspapers to sit on
Sunny day — line on front of Grom and beggar using this opportunity
Context:
Via Morgagni is a 5-blocks long boulevard be-tween Loreto and Porta Venezia metro stations. It’s an inner neighborhood street with not that much of pedestrian traffic of random passers by.
Facilities:
It’s green area includes 2 children playgrounds, 3 dogs grounds (including piazza Lavater), space of Amici delle Bocce – Bocce game field and other spaces of mixed use with only few benches, trees and bushes (probably they were designed as “quiet spaces” on the contrary to kids’ bocce playground, but in reality they look deserted and not safe which is justified by their patrons) There are 2 drinking water fountains, one of the first filtered water dispensing machines from Milan municipality
and even quite rare for Milan - public toilet.
Also on the length of boulevard it accommodates 2 gas stations and Bikemi sharing station, also a bikelane is passigng through.
Flowers shop in the middle close to Amici delle Bocce place significant role in improving overall appearance of boulevard.
There are two newsstands which both offer Wi-Fi Freeluna.
Around there are some bars, restaurants and shops but mostly just residential buildings and offices.
Design: Besides the special grounds all other areas are less
cared of and could benefit from better
design. They have regular Milanese green benches now and offer quite rigid communication structures. This system appear to be working attracting mul-tiple groups of people, but some of them express wish to see better environment.
People/Pattern: This space follows residential life pattern — timeta-ble of children coming back from school to come playing to the kids grounds and working parents taking children out on weekends. Elderly gathers in the afternoons, teens at night. Lunchtime is also popular hour for people to have break here and enjoy staying outdoors.
Patrons: Locals using various mentioned facilities or just coming here to get some rest. Normally it’s not a
destination to travel to, people get here from the surrounding zone.
Overall social: It attracts all the different kinds of people which normally are segregated. There are homeless, el-derly, people with dogs and at the same time kids, at night teens gather here to smoke weed. And it’s all toped by regular runners and cyclists.
Morning is the time of less activity with only few people here
Zone 1, Fri 11/10, 12:30 Zone 3, Tue 16/7, 19:30
Zone 4Zone 4, Mo 15/10, 12:30
Zone 1, We 9/10, 16:48 Zone 5, Tue 16/7, 19:30
Zone 6Zone 4, Sat 5/10, 18:00
By night users change completely, teenagers overtake kids playgrounds
On weekends situation is slightly dif-ferent — older users are still active after 6 p.m.
The most active zone attracting many people, as it has different facil-ities altogether
The least active zone in the end of the street only with benches, usually very deserted
After lunch (and after school) scen-ery changes with many visitors, es-pecially parents with kids and elderly
Not all zones have the same activity hours — some are getting more pop-ulated after 6 p.m.
Especially dog owners come out in the evening and spend a lot of time in their ground
Despite popularity of BikeMi and wa-ter dispensing service Comune hasn’t provide Wi-Fi here for some reasons
Flowers shop in the middle both beautifies the street and is involved in local community
Very different people meet here as they’re locals and communicate de-spite their differences
On the contrary quiet zones provide space for unconventional behaviour like popping bubble wrap O_o
New technologies connect people through generations: grandfather and grandson taking photos for his par-ents
However local community managed the deal with municipality to get spe-cial purpose spaces
Usually local dog owners build a friendly community, but even some of them prefer their devices
Lively atmosphere of children play-grounds attracts “quiet” users like those reading to rest
10/10 11:45
10/10 14:50
10/10 12:15
10/10 15:43
10/10 12:49
10/10 16:20
10/10 14:20
2/10 16:50
2/10 17:50
2/10 18:50
2/10 19:50
2/10 20:20
Space Use
30yo, Egyptian, makes pizza.
“This place has every-thing - Openwifi, McDon-alds, cheap coffee at the snack machine around the corner, drinking fountain, benches, people”
“What would I do in the park? Watch trees? My phone screen is what important to see for me!”
60yo “professor”,spotted him 2 times more, No elec-tricity at home. working, checking mails, charging devices, socializing on his Macbook air, old phone
“I don’t have time to learn all these interfaces! I need to work to take care of my ill mother!”
“Take care of your belong-ings, it’s not that safe around here”
Piazza Oberdan, “home-less, unfortunate” from the other Italian cities
the way they sit — the designed structure is not supporting their needs ergonomically
there is no Wi-Fi there at that moment,
they heard that there’s Openwifi somewhere, but they cannot find it without internet
this spot is still not on the openwifi map
now, when there apper-ared Wi-Fi, electricity plugs were not working anymore
the bench is new, but looks used a lot already because it’s in the place used by homeless and “undesir-ables”, however it found it’s users
Internet is for rich people
I used it in li-brary, but they give only 1 hour
Openwifi mi-lano? I heard that it doesn’t really work
I don’t wanna be in the park, I wanna be online
Wow! look! there’s WiFi here!
All events are sched-uled online
I prefer Internet to the trees
There’s some Wi-Fi here, but we couldn’t figure out how to use it
if there’s no Wi-Fi I cannot enter the space
Hanger out
Needs:
_place close to transport nodes or socially active where they like to hang out_charging phones_assistance_offline communication
_contact with locals?
Prototype: immigrant
He moved to Milan to work from other country. His job allows having a lot of free time. However he’s not able to spend it with quality as his social access is re-stricted. At home he could have university degree and all educated friends, but here people he meets at work are of very lower educational level which causes frustration. He doesn’t have enough money to get In-ternet at home or a 3G, so he’s hanging out using free Wi-Fi to stay connected with friends at home and get some entertaining content.
Socializer
Needs:
_space to hang out in big groups_close to affordable food_sitting_antiboredom content_safety
Prototype: teenager
Comes out to spend some free time with the bigger group of his friends, they prefer to stay altogether and close to food places like McDonalds. Also needs to stay con-nected with other not present ones and so uses public connection to chat with them. Has Internet at home, but not much money to pay for a lot of 3G and uses it a lot ex-ceeding the limit soon. Also has enough time to spend some of it on registration pro-cess and the need to log in every time.
User Archetypes Description
Passing from demographic
description to the space
and service use pattern
Traffic addictedWalker/ShopperSocializerHanger out Productivity seeker
between jobs, on days-off afternoon after school all day long after classes/days off between meetings on workdays
can’t afford home internet, neither 3G
home internet, but when stay outexceeding 3G traffic
possible internet in hotels,don’t buy 3G for short visits not enough home/school/3G internet
home(&office) internet,not enough 3G out
mostdisadvantaged
mostadvantaged
skills
time m
oney nowledge soc. ac
cess
tra
ffic
skills
time m
oney nowledge soc. ac
cess
tra
ffic
skills
time m
oney nowledge soc. ac
cess
tra
ffic
skills
time m
oney nowledge soc. ac
cess
tra
ffic
skills
time m
oney nowledge soc. ac
cess
tra
ffic
timetime
money
.acc
skills
skills
money
oc.acce
ss
skills
raffi
c
Internet
Space
Functional
Emotional
Enough traffic to use SN, check news and updates, get some content
Comfortable to stay quite a long time, charge the phone, but can be quite crowded
Wans to stay in touch with friends
Get local friends, assimilate, entertainment, but cheap/free
Watching videos/listening music, using SN
Comfortable for big groups, allowing fluid gatherings
Get info from friends and share content experience
Be cool, be safe
Info about the city, SN, easy sharing
Interesting and pleasant to stay in and have rest
Check updates, find routes, share experience
Enjoy staying in the city without getting lost, frustrated and wasting time
Traffic enought to download something, make research online
Pleasant, not too crowded, allowing to stay there for a while
Getting studying and entertain-ment content
Communication with other students, socializiing, learning new things
Reliable fast connection
Productive space (vary for people) allowing stay with laptop
Get job done
Don’t waste time, be efficient, but also not bored
Not satisfied with existing offer, but are the “truly Wi-Fi audience”Somewhat satisfied with existing service
NEEDS:
W
Understanding User Journey and Breakdown Moments
Authorization/Registration
Maybe it’s also in place?
Some people can even drop idea as soon as they see the authorization required, others waste a lot of time on it
Position of zones in the city
lots of hotspots are in the meaning-less places while other important are left
Didn’t know that there’s municipal Wi-Fi at all! But can it be reliable?
I will just fast
Why am I not recieving the messages?
Comune
?! Register!
Oh! Wi-Fi here!Why here?!
Connection before registration stops people from receiving messages and notifications over their normal 3G
Communication of overall thing
Lots of people don’t even know that there is such an Openwifi. Because of communication and existing reputation of public services in Italy there are trust problems
Comune website is the only content advantage of existing offer and the website itself doesn’t have many useful services
Scarcity of special content/services
Isole Digitali and Openwifi Milano arenot linked well together in the overall system and people don’t movebetween spots
Bad communication inside the service
There are existing offers in the city, butinstead of working in synergy, they do add complications and frustration
Fragmentation
It’s nice here: shadeand benches!
But no ?!
Finally!
Can’t believe!
ComuneFreeluna Register
with FbADS ADSADS ADSADS ADS
But it’s different!
At least I can register fast!
Oh no! Full of ads!
I thought I couldfind transport INFO
at least!
&
Oh, I have to
log in again!
Safety
Social tension
People using internet get less aware of their surround-ings, plu sthey’re o in the higher risk as they’re exposing devices
Diversity in public realm is generally considered to be positive for urban life, however it can cause less usage of service
Digital divide
The most loyal users are those that don’thave any other option, however as theyspend more time here, their needs should be treated more careful, plus educational work required
It’s imposssible to move between
different zones not losing connection and authorization is
required again
Roaming
This bench is souncomfortable!
I cannot reach the socket if I sit
down!
I’ve exhausted allthe traffic already!
He will rob me!
Internet is for rich people!
=(
Invisibility of zones in the city
Limited trafficSurrounding environment
Even when someoneknows that there’s a spotin the area, it’s hard to find it and people sitting right in the place often don’t evenrealize it
The street furniture is not supporting the usage of wifi from the ergonomic point of view as well as not helping on sunny days, etc.
500 Mb a day is rather a good offer, comparing toCellular cometitors,however it’s not exactlywhat’s expected from Wifi(plus knowing about thislimit gives people negativeimpression even if they won’t ever exhaust it)
Meanwhile in Piazza Argentina...
I’ve seen ,but I cannot find it here!
1. The existing position of spots is not the best from the users point of view; each citizen has the unique knowledge of the city and some of them would really like to share it and take help decision-making process
2. Citizens don't appreciate the built infrastruc-ture and Comune's efforts invested in it
3. Citizens don't know the real situation with OpenWifi; it's hard to find any information
4. Comune is afraid to become competitors with the Telecom operators; Comune is se-riously limited in budget
5. People often don't even know about the presence of Wi-Fi in the place they're
6. People don't know how to find out, where is Openwifi Milan, some of them don't have internet to make preliminary research
7. Different uses (phone call/email checking/watching video/listening music/chatting) require different physical settings; users with different devices have varying ergonomic needs
8. People will spend time at the place if they need it despite any design, but they will be uncomfortable; existing design interferes us-ers' behaviour
9. When using expensive devices and being completely focused on the virtual world, people become more vulnerable to robber-ies and become anxious because of that
10. Public connectivity can be used by most var-ious types of users, but some of them (like digital divided groups) need more "care"
Existing Service Problems
than others
11. People would like to stay away from cer-tain groups of others; consideration that Wi-Fi can improve the situation with unde-sirables doesn't work anymore - everyone has cellphones even if they were stolen
12. Minutes wasted on registration and au-thorization are enough for people to drop idea of using service
13. When is starts like that users' expectations of service drop as well from the very be-ginning
14. Some people drop the idea of using public Wi-Fi just as soon as they see the landing page requiring registration, they don’t even read the offer
15. The style of PUBLIC service is not that ap-pealing to people who're overwhelmed by commercial offers language
16. People don't have time/will/power (es-pecially at the street) to get into too much information and learn new rules and inter-faces
17. Being "free" is not enough for the offer to be desirable for people to switch from the one they're using
1. Involve citizens crowdsourcing power to plan better infrastruc-ture/Put spots where they’re really needed
2. Communicate the value of infra-structure to people
3. Communicate clearly all the steps and state of existing development
4. Think of the possible partnerships where Comune is seen as a facili-tator of processes for the common good, not a competitor
5. Make infrastructure clearly visible to people in the city
6. Provide full and precise commu-nication materials (maps, signs, apps), keep them updated and accessible not only online
7. Choose places meaningful for citizens
8. Choose or create the proper sup-portive environment for various usages of infrastructure
9. Ergonomic concerns should be the most important, goals of pub-lic “rotation”, etc, should not be achieved through bad design
10. Preserve safety of created spaces
Design Principles
11. Support needs of diverse groups of users
12. Be inclusive, but manage conse-quences: help to release social tension originating from the het-erogeneity of people in public
13. Respect people’s time over any-thing
14. Build and support users’ trust in service
15. Communicate the offer fast and clear
16. Keep it calm and engaging
17. Keep it supersimple
18. Add a new demanded value to the offer besides its commercial bene-fit and communicate it clearly
19. Keep it transparent (especially when working with citizens’ money)
20. Use the Social Media power to promote the infrastructure
they don’t want to competethey don’t want to spend money on com-munication hoping that word of mouth will workand they say that it’s going fineBUTthey don’t give information say that now we’re finishing the infrastruc-ture and will start to think of services
build it FOR citizens using citizens’ money and don’t want
to communicate with citizens
they will fail and no one will even notice
Mapping Global ContextVery different forces are involved in municipal Wi-Fi system
Users want to get to the network, but accessibility problem stops them,
Investors want to reach the users, but there are a lot of obstacles on the way - competitors and accessi-bility problem whihc render service not that usable.
The feedback loop between users and investors is broken also. more than that many users are actu-ally investors as the public network is built partially on their money, but there is no transparency and they don’t see the situation.
Comune
WIFi Zones
Communication Website
Internet Gateway Services
Digital Islands
Investors
Users
Virtual network access
Devices
Authentication
Internet
Intranet
wwwother services
Expo EUTaxpayersMicrosoft
Decision making committeeMayor Project Team
Zone’s councils
Signage
Social Media
Bloggers
MapsCustomer Support
Hotspots Supports
ATMBritish Telecom
Hardware provider
Fiber Optics
EM-waves (wifi)
Electricity
LOCATIONS
Network Adminis-tration
Benches
Sockets
Lights
CCTV
maintenance
Internet provider
Sim cardsOS
Comune users
Machine users
City services
Geek usersLead usersMajorityDigitally divided
AppsLocal businesses
Wifi providersCompetitors
Cellular operators
Cell operatorsFragmentation
physical surroundings
Interfering objects
existing street furniture
Radio Spectrum regulations
Electicity company
Urban furniture usage regulations
Installation
TRENDS:
Networked societySmart cities
Video culture
Internet of things
Developers
Promoters
Advocates groups
existing street furniture
No clear feedback between taxpayers and users. (no acces-sible data on the level of use of the service)Poor ergonomics not
suppoting the wifi use.
Absence of tech-community interested in wifi in the city. (AssoWifi is meant for it, but it has some issues)
Both users and competi -tors
Demand more services
Only Windows phone now!
No yet
Often questionable
Superpoor
BRANDINGIS BAD
Both investors and competitors are fighting for the end users. Investor’s money are spend to sustain the service, but the internal weaknesses (poor services and authentication complications) of it make users to prefer competitors’ offers as for now.
Accessibility