Phusit Prakongsai Kanjana Tisayatikom International Health Policy Program (IHPP)
International Health Policy Program -Thailand Lesson Learnt from the Estimate of Maternal Death in...
-
Upload
timothy-thomas -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of International Health Policy Program -Thailand Lesson Learnt from the Estimate of Maternal Death in...
Inte
rna
tio
na
l H
ea
lth
Po
lic
y P
rog
ram
-T
ha
ila
nd
Inte
rnati
onal H
ealt
h P
olic
y P
rogra
m -
Thaila
nd
Lesson Learnt from the Estimate of
Maternal Death in ThailandKanjana Tisayaticom Sudarat Tantivivat Phusit Prakongsai
International Health Policy Program (IHPP), Thailand
The 3rd Global Forum on Gender Statistics11-13 October 2010Manila, Philippines
ESA/STAT/AC.219/36
Inte
rna
tio
na
l H
ea
lth
Po
lic
y P
rog
ram
-T
ha
ila
nd
Inte
rnati
onal H
ealt
h P
olic
y P
rogra
m -
Thaila
nd
Outline
• Introduction– MDG achievements and maternal death in
Thailand
• Different approaches and statistics of maternal death – Vital statistics - Bureau of Policy and Strategy,
MOPH– Multiple sources of data - Thailand Development
Research Institute (TDRI) – Reproductive age mortality surveys (RAMOS) and
verbal autopsy (VA)
• Conclusions and policy recommendations
Inte
rna
tio
na
l H
ea
lth
Po
lic
y P
rog
ram
-T
ha
ila
nd
Inte
rnati
onal H
ealt
h P
olic
y P
rogra
m -
Thaila
nd
Maternal death in Thailand
3
MMR 1960-2006: six sources of references
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
Year
MM
R pe
r 10
0,00
0 liv
e bi
rths
BPS
BHP
RAMOS
TDRI
Lancet 2010
WHO
Inte
rna
tio
na
l H
ea
lth
Po
lic
y P
rog
ram
-T
ha
ila
nd
Inte
rnati
onal H
ealt
h P
olic
y P
rogra
m -
Thaila
nd
Objectives of the study
• To describe differences in maternal death in Thailand using different types of data sources and data collection approaches,
• To explore strengths and weaknesses of three different approaches in estimation of maternal deaths in Thailand– Using vital registration by BPS, MOPH– Using multiple data by TDRI,– RAMOS technique and verbal autopsy (VA).
Inte
rna
tio
na
l H
ea
lth
Po
lic
y P
rog
ram
-T
ha
ila
nd
Inte
rnati
onal H
ealt
h P
olic
y P
rogra
m -
Thaila
nd
Bureau of Policy and Strategy (BPS)
,MOPH
• Vital registration – Death registration (coverage 95.2% in 2006: SPC 2005-2006) – Birth registration (coverage 96.7% in 2006: SPC 2005-2006)
• Coding cause of death using ICD 10 by BPS staff • Pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium O00-O99
• O00-O08 Pregnancy with abortive outcome• O10-O16 Oedema, proteinuria and hypertensive
disorders in pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium• O20-O29 Other maternal disorders
predominantly related to pregnancy• O30-O48 Maternal care related to the fetus and
amniotic cavity and possible delivery problems• O60-O75 Complications of labour and delivery• O80-O84 Delivery• O85-O92 Complications predominantly related to
the puerperium• O94-O99 Other obstetric conditions, not
elsewhere classified 5
Inte
rna
tio
na
l H
ea
lth
Po
lic
y P
rog
ram
-T
ha
ila
nd
Inte
rnati
onal H
ealt
h P
olic
y P
rogra
m -
Thaila
nd
Rates of Maternal Deaths per 100,000 Live births by Cause Grouping According to ICD
6source : Health Information Unit, Bureau of Health Policy and Strategy
Inte
rna
tio
na
l H
ea
lth
Po
lic
y P
rog
ram
-T
ha
ila
nd
Inte
rnati
onal H
ealt
h P
olic
y P
rogra
m -
Thaila
nd
Using Multiple Data for Calculating the Maternal Mortality Ratio in Thailand by
TDRI
• Data sources– Vital registration
• Birth registration• Death registration
– Inpatient data set • Civil Servant beneficiaries scheme• Universal coverage scheme
• Methods– Method 1: Mothers Who Died after Giving a
Live Birth– Method 2: Women Ending Pregnancy with
Stillbirth or Neonatal Death
7
Inte
rna
tio
na
l H
ea
lth
Po
lic
y P
rog
ram
-T
ha
ila
nd
Inte
rnati
onal H
ealt
h P
olic
y P
rogra
m -
Thaila
nd
Method 1: Mothers Who Died after Giving a Live Birth
8
Match same PID from the date of birth plus 42 days
Birth Registration Obtain PID of mother
Match PID with death certificate Obtain the recorded cause of death
Incidental cause of deathMaternal death
Death Registration Obtain PID
Method 2: Women Ending Pregnancy with Stillbirth or Neonatal
9
Match same PID of those who have in
patient records nine month before the date
of death
Death registration Obtain PID of reproductive-aged women
Match PID with death certificate Obtain the recorded cause of death
Incidental cause of deathMaternal death
In patient record from CSMBS obtain
PID &ICD 10
In patient record from UC Obtain PID & ICD10
Inte
rna
tio
na
l H
ea
lth
Po
lic
y P
rog
ram
-T
ha
ila
nd
Inte
rnati
onal H
ealt
h P
olic
y P
rogra
m -
Thaila
nd
Maternal mortality ratio using TDRI approach
were more than 3 times higher than the estimate from BPS of MOPH
10
Inte
rna
tio
na
l H
ea
lth
Po
lic
y P
rog
ram
-T
ha
ila
nd
Inte
rnati
onal H
ealt
h P
olic
y P
rogra
m -
Thaila
nd
The Reproductive Age Mortality Survey (RAMOS)
Method• Primarily quantitative• Qualitative for verbal autopsies ApproachIdentifies and investigates all deaths of
womenof reproductive age (15-49 years) usingmultiple data sources.Phase 1: Death IdentificationPhase 2: Death Review
Inte
rna
tio
na
l H
ea
lth
Po
lic
y P
rog
ram
-T
ha
ila
nd
Inte
rnati
onal H
ealt
h P
olic
y P
rogra
m -
Thaila
nd
The 1st Phase: Death Identification
Identify all deaths in the community throughone or more sources as listed below:
• Routine death registrations• Medical records in health facilities• Interviews with health care providers• Census• Multiples sources of information
Inte
rna
tio
na
l H
ea
lth
Po
lic
y P
rog
ram
-T
ha
ila
nd
Inte
rnati
onal H
ealt
h P
olic
y P
rogra
m -
Thaila
nd
The 2nd Phase: Death Review
Investigate deaths of women reproductive age todetermine the cause of death and relatedness topregnancy through various sources as list below:
• Medical records and coroners’ reports• Interview of health care providers• Interview of family members (Verbal Autopsy)
13
RAMOS and other methods
1990 1995
1997
2000
2002 2004 2005 2006
BPS – MOPH 25.0 10.7
9.7 13.2
14.7 13.3 12.2 11.7
TDRI 44.5 37.4 41.6
RAMOS* & verbal autopsy
44.3
36.5
WHO & UNICEF
50.0 52.0
63.0
51.0Source: Bureau of Health Promotion 2006Note: BPS = Bureau of Policy and StrategyMOPH = Ministry of Public HealthTDRI = Thailand Development Research Institute* The reproductive age mortality studies (RAMOS) technique identifies and investigates all deaths of women of reproductive age (15-49 years) using multiple data sources. This method includes interviewing household members and health care providers.
Inte
rna
tio
na
l H
ea
lth
Po
lic
y P
rog
ram
-T
ha
ila
nd
Inte
rnati
onal H
ealt
h P
olic
y P
rogra
m -
Thaila
nd
Strengths and WeaknessesApproaches Strengths Weaknesses
BPS, MOPH • Availability of routine data • Coverage of birth and death registration over 95%
• High proportion of ill-defined cause of Death (COD)• Require skillful of coding• Require good collaboration between MOPH and Bureau of Registration Administration (BORA)
TDRI • Higher accuracy in delivery related maternal death • Include medically certified COD (IP data)
• High investment in data warehouse and IT infrastructures• Missing data of non hospitalize patient• Ethical violation : invasion of privacy
Reproductive Age Mortality Surveys (RAMOS)
• Can address the mortality of women of reproductive age• Can identify the underlying cause groups of maternal deaths
• Complex, Costly and time-consuming• Requires complete death report and multiple sources 15
Inte
rna
tio
na
l H
ea
lth
Po
lic
y P
rog
ram
-T
ha
ila
nd
Inte
rnati
onal H
ealt
h P
olic
y P
rogra
m -
Thaila
nd
Conclusions and policy recommendation
• High gaps between the estimate of MMR from vital registration and other approaches,
• Improve accuracy of estimate MMR in any approaches inevitably need completeness and accuracy of vital registration,
• In developing countries, it is unlikely to conduct RAMOS either annually or biennially due to limited resources and time consuming,
• Though Thailand has achieved high coverage of birth and death registration, high proportion of ill-defined cause of death (COD) is the major challenge.
16
Thank you for your attention