International Evaluation of Research and Doctoral Training ... · INTERNATIONAL EVALUA TION OF...

Evaluation Panel: Humanities

INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI 2005–2010

RC-Specific Evaluation of ILLC – Interfaces between Language, Literature and Culture Seppo Saari & Antti Moilanen (Eds.)

INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI 2005–2010

RC-Specific Evaluation of ILLC – Interfaces between Language, Literature and Culture Seppo Saari & Antti Moilanen (Eds.)

University of Helsinki Administrative Publications 80/92 Evaluations

Publisher: University of Helsinki

Editors: Seppo Saari & Antti Moilanen

Title: International Evaluation of Research and Doctoral Training at the University of Helsinki 2005–2010 : RC-Specific Evaluation of ILLC – Interfaces between Language, Literature and Culture

Type of publication: Evaluations

Summary: Researcher Community (RC) was a new concept of the participating unit in the evaluation. Participation in the evaluation was voluntary and the RCs had to choose one of the five characteristic categories to participate. Evaluation of the Researcher Community was based on the answers to the evaluation questions. In addition a list of publications and other activities were provided by the TUHAT system. The CWTS/Leiden University conducted analyses for 80 RCs and the Helsinki University Library for 66 RCs. Panellists, 49 and two special experts in five panels evaluated all the evaluation material as a whole and discussed the feedback for RC-specific reports in the panel meetings in Helsinki. The main part of this report is consisted of the feedback which is published as such in the report. Chapters in the report: 1. Background for the evaluation 2. Evaluation feedback for the Researcher Community 3. List of publications 4. List of activities 5. Bibliometric analyses The level of the RCs’ success can be concluded from the written feedback together with the numeric evaluation of four evaluation questions and the category fitness. More conclusions of the success can be drawn based on the University-level report.

RC-specific information:

Main scientific field of research: Humanities Participation category: 3. Research of the participating community is distinct from mainstream research, and the special features of the research tradition in the field must be considered in the evaluation RC’s responsible person: Pettersson, Bo

RC-specific keywords: Linguistics; literary studies; narrative studies; cultural studies; translation studies; interdisciplinarity; English, French, Russian

Keywords: Research Evaluation, Meta-evaluation, Doctoral Training, Bibliometric Analyses, Researcher Community

Series title and number: University of Helsinki, Administrative Publications 80/92, Evaluations

ISSN: 1795-5513 (Online)

ISBN: 978-952-10-7512-4 (PDF)

Total number of pages: 84

Language: English

Additional information: Cover graphics: Päivi Talonpoika-Ukkonen Enquiries: [email protected]

Internet address: http://www.helsinki.fi/julkaisut/aineisto/rc_evaluation2012/hallinnon_julkaisuja_80_92_2012.pdf

Contents Panel members ........................................................................................................................... 1 1 Introduction to the Evaluation ............................................................................................... 5

1.1 RC-specific evaluation reports .......................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Aims and objectives in the evaluation ............................................................................................... 5 1.3 Evaluation method ............................................................................................................................ 5 1.4 Implementation of the external evaluation ........................................................................................ 6 1.5 Evaluation material ........................................................................................................................... 7 1.6 Evaluation questions and material .................................................................................................... 8 1.7 Evaluation criteria ........................................................................................................................... 10 1.8 Timetable of the evaluation ............................................................................................................. 13 1.9 Evaluation feedback – consensus of the entire panel ..................................................................... 13

2 Evaluation feedback .............................................................................................................. 15 2.1 Focus and quality of the RC’s research .......................................................................................... 15 2.2 Practises and quality of doctoral training ........................................................................................ 15 2.3 The societal impact of research and doctoral training ..................................................................... 16 2.4 International and national (incl. intersectoral) research collaboration and researcher mobility ....... 16 2.5 Operational conditions .................................................................................................................... 17 2.6 Leadership and management in the researcher community ........................................................... 17 2.7 External competitive funding of the RC ........................................................................................... 18 2.8 The RC’s strategic action plan for 2011–2013 ................................................................................ 18 2.9 Evaluation of the category of the RC in the context of entity of the evaluation material (1-8) ......... 19 2.10 Short description of how the RC members contributed the compilation of the stage 2 material ... 19 2.11 How the UH’s focus areas are presented in the RC’s research .................................................... 19 2.12 RC-specific main recommendations ............................................................................................. 19 2.13 RC-specific conclusions ................................................................................................................ 19

3 Appendices ............................................................................................................................ 21

Foreword The evaluation of research and doctoral training is being carried out in the years 2010–2012 and will end in 2012. The steering group appointed by the Rector in January 2010 set the conditions for participating in the evaluation and prepared the Terms of Reference to present the evaluation procedure and criteria. The publications and other scientific activities included in the evaluation covered the years 2005–2010.

The participating unit in the evaluation was defined as a Researcher Community (RC). To obtain a critical mass with university-level impact, the number of members was set to range from 20 to 120. The RCs were required to contain researchers in all stages of their research career, from doctoral students to principal investigators (PIs). All in all, 136 Researcher Communities participated in this voluntary evaluation, 5857 persons in total, of whom 1131 were principal investigators. PIs were allowed to participate in two communities in certain cases, and 72 of them used this opportunity and participated in two RCs.

This evaluation enabled researchers to define RCs from the “bottom up” and across disciplines. The aim of the evaluation was not to assess individual performance but a community with shared aims and researcher-training activities. The RCs were able to choose among five different categories that characterised the status and main aims of their research. The steering group considered the process of applying to participate in the evaluation to be important, which lead to the establishment of these categories. In addition, providing a service for the RCs to enable them to benchmark their research at the global level was a main goal of the evaluation.

The data for the evaluation consisted of the RCs’ answers to evaluation questions on supplied e-forms and a compilation extracted from the TUHAT – Research Information System (RIS) on 12 April 2011. The compilation covered scientific and other publications as well as certain areas of scientific activities. During the process, the RCs were asked to check the list of publications and other scientific activities and make corrections if needed. These TUHAT compilations are public and available on the evaluation project sites of each RC in the TUHAT-RIS.

In addition to the e-form and TUHAT compilation, University of Leiden (CWTS) carried out bibliometric analyses from the articles included in the Web of Science (WoS). This was done on University and RC levels. In cases where the publication forums of the RC were clearly not represented by the WoS data, the Library of the University of Helsinki conducted a separate analysis of the publications. This was done for 66 RCs representing the humanities and social sciences.

The evaluation office also carried out an enquiry targeted to the supervisors and PhD candidates about the organisation of doctoral studies at the University of Helsinki. This and other documents describing the University and the Finnish higher education system were provided to the panellists.

The panel feedback for each RC is unique and presented as an entity. The first collective evaluation reports available for the whole panel were prepared in July–August 2011. The reports were accessible to all panel members via the electronic evaluation platform in August. Scoring from 1 to 5 was used to complement written feedback in association with evaluation questions 1–4 (scientific focus and quality, doctoral training, societal impact, cooperation) and in addition to the category evaluating the fitness for participation in the evaluation. Panellists used the international level as a point of comparison in the evaluation. Scoring was not expected to go along with a preset deviation.

Each of the draft reports were discussed and dealt with by the panel in meetings in Helsinki (from 11 September to 13 September or from 18 September to 20 September 2011). In these meetings the panels also examined the deviations among the scores and finalised the draft reports together.

The current RC-specific report deals shortly with the background of the evaluation and the terms of participation. The main evaluation feedback is provided in the evaluation report, organised according to the evaluation questions. The original material provided by the RCs for the panellists has been attached to these documents.

On behalf of the evaluation steering group and office, I sincerely wish to thank you warmly for your

participation in this evaluation. The effort you made in submitting the data to TUHAT-RIS is gratefully acknowledged by the University. We wish that you find this panel feedback useful in many ways. The bibliometric profiles may open a new view on your publication forums and provide a perspective for discussion on your choice of forums. We especially hope that this evaluation report will help you in setting the future goals of your research.

Johanna Björkroth Vice-Rector Chair of the Steering Group of the Evaluation

Steering Group of the evaluation Steering group, nominated by the Rector of the University, was responsible for the planning of the evaluation and its implementation having altogether 22 meetings between February 2010 and March 2012. They all represent the University of Helsinki.

Chair

Vice-Rector, professor Johanna Björkroth Vice-Chair

Professor Marja Airaksinen

Chief Information Specialist, Dr Maria Forsman Professor Arto Mustajoki University Lecturer, Dr Kirsi Pyhältö Director of Strategic Planning and Development, Dr Ossi Tuomi Doctoral candidate, MSocSc Jussi Vauhkonen

1

Panel members

CHAIR Professor Wim van den Doel Contemporary history, history of European relations with the world beyond Europe Leiden University, the Netherlands VICE-CHAIR Professor Kerstin Jonasson Romance languages, linguistics Uppsala University, Sweden Professor Regina Bendix European ethnology, scientific history of ethnography, folklore University of Göttingen, Germany Professor Paul Cobley History, American studies, communication, semiotics London Metropolitan University, Great Britain Professor Troels Engberg-Pedersen1 Theology, early Christian thought, ancient philosophy University of Copenhagen, Denmark Professor Erhard Hinrichs Linguistics, language technology, infrastructures Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Germany Professor Jutta Scherrer Intellectual and cultural history of Russia, history of ideologies L'École des hautes études en sciences sociales (EHESS), France Professor Klaus Tanner2 Theology, ethics University of Heidelberg, Germany Professor Pauline von Bonsdorff Aesthetics, art education University of Jyväskylä, Finland

The panel, independently, evaluated all the submitted material and was responsible for the feedback of the RC-specific reports. The panel members were asked to confirm whether they had any conflict of interests with the RCs. If this was the case, the panel members disqualified themselves in discussion and report writing.

Added expertise to the evaluation was contributed by the members from the other panels.

Experts from the Other Panels Professor Caitlin Buck, from the Panel of Natural Sciences Professor Allen Ketcham, from the Panel of Social Sciences Professor Erno Lehtinen, from the Panel of Social Sciences Professor Jan van Leeuwen, from the Panel of Natural Sciences

1 Professor Engberg-Pedersen contributed in the report writing although was not able to take part in the meetings in Helsinki. 2 Professor Tanner was involved in the discussions in Helsinki, but not in the pre-work and writing of the reports.

2

EVALUATION OFFICE Dr Seppo Saari, Doc., Senior Adviser in Evaluation, was responsible for the entire evaluation, its planning and implementation and acted as an Editor-in-chief of the reports.

Dr Eeva Sievi, Doc., Adviser, was responsible for the registration and evaluation material compilations for the panellists. She worked in the evaluation office from August 2010 to July 2011. MSocSc Paula Ranne, Planning Officer, was responsible for organising the panel meetings and all the other practical issues like agreements and fees and editing a part the RC-specific reports. She worked in the evaluation office from March 2011 to January 2012. Mr Antti Moilanen, Project Secretary, was responsible for editing the reports. He worked in the evaluation office from January 2012 to April 2012. TUHAT OFFICE Provision of the publication and other scientific activity data Mrs Aija Kaitera, Project Manager of TUHAT-RIS served the project ex officio providing the evaluation project with the updated information from TUHAT-RIS. The TUHAT office assisted in mapping the publications with CWTS/University of Leiden. MA Liisa Ekebom, Assisting Officer, served in TUHAT-RIS updating the publications for the evaluation. She also assisted the UH/Library analyses. BA Liisa Jäppinen, Assisting Officer, served in TUHAT-RIS updating the publications for the evaluation. HELSINKI UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Provision of the publication analyses Dr Maria Forsman, Chief Information Specialist in the Helsinki University Library, managed with her 10 colleagues the bibliometric analyses in humanities, social sciences and in other fields of sciences where CWTS analyses were not applicable.

3

Acronyms and abbreviations applied in the report External competitive funding

AF – Academy of Finland TEKES - Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation EU - European Union ERC - European Research Council International and national foundations FP7/6 etc. /Framework Programmes/Funding of European Commission

Evaluation marks

Outstanding (5) Excellent (4) Very Good (3) Good (2) Sufficient (1)

Abbreviations of Bibliometric Indicators

P - Number of publications TCS – Total number of citations MCS - Number of citations per publication, excluding self-citations PNC - Percentage of uncited publications MNCS - Field-normalized number of citations per publication MNJS - Field-normalized average journal impact THCP10 - Field-normalized proportion highly cited publications (top 10%) INT_COV - Internal coverage, the average amount of references covered by the WoS WoS – Thomson Reuters Web of Science Databases

Participation category Category 1. The research of the participating community represents the international cutting edge in its field. Category 2. The research of the participating community is of high quality, but the community in its present composition has yet to achieve strong international recognition or a clear break-through. Category 3. The research of the participating community is distinct from mainstream research, and the special features of the research tradition in the field must be considered in the evaluation. Category 4. The research of the participating community represents an innovative opening. Category 5. The research of the participating community has a highly significant societal impact.

Research focus areas of the University of Helsinki

Focus area 1: The basic structure, materials and natural resources of the physical world Focus area 2: The basic structure of life Focus area 3: The changing environment – clean water Focus area 4: The thinking and learning human being Focus area 5: Welfare and safety Focus area 6: Clinical research Focus area 7: Precise reasoning Focus area 8: Language and culture Focus area 9: Social justice Focus area 10: Globalisation and social change

5

1 Introduction to the Evaluation

1.1 RC-specific evaluation reports

The participants in the evaluation of research and doctoral training were Researcher Communities (hereafter referred to as the RC). The RC refers to the group of researchers who registered together in the evaluation of their research and doctoral training. Preconditions in forming RCs were stated in the Guidelines for the Participating Researcher Communities. The RCs defined themselves whether their compositions should be considered well-established or new.

It is essential to emphasise that the evaluation combines both meta-evaluation3 and traditional research assessment exercise and its focus is both on the research outcomes and procedures associated with research and doctoral training. The approach to the evaluation is enhancement-led where self-evaluation constituted the main information. The answers to the evaluation questions formed together with the information of publications and other scientific activities an entity that was to be reviewed as a whole.

The present evaluation recognizes and justifies the diversity of research practices and publication traditions. Traditional Research Assessment Exercises do not necessarily value high quality research with low volumes or research distinct from mainstream research. It is challenging to expose the diversity of research to fair comparison. To understand the essence of different research practices and to do justice to their diversity was one of the main challenges of the present evaluation method. Understanding the divergent starting points of the RCs demanded sensitivity from the evaluators.

1.2 Aims and objectives in the evaluation

The aims of the evaluation are as follows:

to improve the level of research and doctoral training at the University of Helsinki and to raise their international profile in accordance with the University’s strategic policies. The improvement of doctoral training should be compared to the University’s policy.4

to enhance the research conducted at the University by taking into account the diversity, originality, multidisciplinary nature, success and field-specificity,

to recognize the conditions and prerequisites under which excellent, original and high-impact research is carried out,

to offer the academic community the opportunity to receive topical and versatile international peer feedback,

to better recognize the University’s research potential. to exploit the University’s TUHAT research information system to enable transparency of

publishing activities and in the production of reliable, comparable data.

1.3 Evaluation method

The evaluation can be considered as an enhancement-led evaluation. Instead of ranking, the main aim is to provide useful information for the enhancement of research and doctoral training of the participating RCs. The comparison should take into account each field of science and acknowledge their special character.

3 The panellists did not read research reports or abstracts but instead, they evaluated answers to the evaluation

questions, tables and compilations of publications, other scientific activities, bibliometrics or comparable analyses. 4

Policies on doctoral degrees and other postgraduate degrees at the University of Helsinki.

http://www.helsinki.fi/tutkinnonuudistus/materiaalit/Policies%20concerning%20doctoral%20degrees%20-%20engl.pdf

6

The comparison produced information about the present status and factors that have lead to success. Also challenges in the operations and outcomes were recognized.

The evaluation approach has been designed to recognize better the significance and specific nature of researcher communities and research areas in the multidisciplinary top-level university. Furthermore, one of the aims of the evaluation is to bring to light those evaluation aspects that differ from the prevalent ones. Thus the views of various fields of research can be described and research arising from various starting points understood better. The doctoral training is integrated into the evaluation as a natural component related to research. Operational processes of doctoral training are being examined in the evaluation.

Five stages of the evaluation method were:

1. Registration – Stage 1 2. Self-evaluation – Stage 2 3. TUHAT5 compilations on publications and other scientific activities6 4. External evaluation 5. Public reporting

1.4 Implementation of the external evaluation

Five Evaluation Panels Five evaluation panels consisted of independent, renowned and highly respected experts. The main domains of the panels are:

1. biological, agricultural and veterinary sciences 2. medicine, biomedicine and health sciences 3. natural sciences 4. humanities 5. social sciences

The University invited 10 renowned scientists to act as chairs or vice-chairs of the five panels based on the suggestions of faculties and independent institutes. Besides leading the work of the panel, an additional role of the chairs was to discuss with other panel chairs in order to adopt a broadly similar approach. The panel chairs and vice-chairs had a pre-meeting on 27 May 2011 in Amsterdam.

The panel compositions were nominated by the Rector of the University 27 April 2011. The participating RCs suggested the panel members. The total number of panel members was 50. The reason for a smaller number of panellists as compared to the previous evaluations was the character of the evaluation as a meta-evaluation. The panellists did not read research reports or abstracts but instead, they evaluated answers to the evaluation questions, tables and compilations of publications, other scientific activities, bibliometrics and comparable analyses. The panel meetings were held in Helsinki:

On 11–13 September 2011: (1) biological, agricultural and veterinary sciences, (2) medicine, biomedicine and health sciences and (3) natural sciences.

On 18–20 September 2011: (4) humanities and (5) social sciences.

5 TUHAT (acronym) of Research Information System (RIS) of the University of Helsinki 6 Supervision of thesis, prizes and awards, editorial work and peer reviews, participation in committees, boards and

networks and public appearances.

7

1.5 Evaluation material

The main material in the evaluation was the RCs’ self-evaluations that were qualitative in character and allowed the RCs to choose what was important to mention or emphasise and what was left unmentioned.

The present evaluation is exceptional at least in the Finnish context because it is based on both the evaluation documentation (self-evaluation questions, publications and other scientific activities) and the bibliometric reports. All documents were delivered to the panellists for examination.

Traditional bibliometrics can be reasonably done mainly in medicine, biosciences and natural sciences when using the Web of Science database, for example. Bibliometrics, provided by CWTS/The Centre for Science and Technology Studies, University of Leiden, cover only the publications that include WoS identification in the TUHAT-RIS.

Traditional bibliometrics are seldom relevant in humanities and social sciences because the international comparable databases do not store every type of high quality research publications, such as books and monographs and scientific journals in other languages than English. The Helsinki University Library has done analysis to the RCs, if their publications were not well represented in the Web of Science databases (RCs should have at least 50 publications and internal coverage of publications more than 40%) – it meant 58 RCs. The bibliometric material for the evaluation panels was available in June 2011. The RC-specific bibliometric reports are attached at the end of each report.

The panels were provided with the evaluation material and all other necessary background information, such as the basic information about the University of Helsinki and the Finnish higher education system.

Evaluation material

1. Registration documents of the RCs for the background information 2. Self evaluation material – answers to the evaluation questions 3. Publications and other scientific activities based on the TUHAT RIS:

3.1. statistics of publications 3.2. list of publications 3.3. statistics of other scientific activities 3.4. list of other scientific activities

4. Bibliometrics and comparable analyses: 4.1. Analyses of publications based on the verification of TUHAT-RIS publications with the Web

of Science publications (CWTS/University of Leiden) 4.2. Publication statistics analysed by the Helsinki University Library - mainly for humanities and

social sciences 5. University level survey on doctoral training (August 2011) 6. University level analysis on publications 2005–2010 (August 2011) provided by CWTS/University

of Leiden

Background material University of Helsinki - Basic information about the University of the Helsinki - The structure of doctoral training at the University of Helsinki - Previous evaluations of research at the University of Helsinki – links to the reports: 1998 and 2005

The Finnish Universities/Research Institutes - Finnish University system - Evaluation of the Finnish National Innovation System - The State and Quality of Scientific Research in Finland. Publication of the Academy of Finland

9/09.

The evaluation panels were provided also with other relevant material on request before the meetings in Helsinki.

https://wiki.helsinki.fi/download/attachments/70911363/UH_introduction_27052011ES.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1307360471459

https://wiki.helsinki.fi/download/attachments/70911363/UH_DoctoralTraining.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1307360051433

http://www.helsinki.fi/arviointi2010-2012/tutkimuksenarviointi_raportti_1999.pdf

http://www.helsinki.fi/arviointi2010-2012/tutkimuksenarviointi_raportti_2005.pdf

https://wiki.helsinki.fi/download/attachments/70911363/HE_Finland_introduction_27052011ES.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1307359986235

https://wiki.helsinki.fi/download/attachments/70911363/InnoEvaluation_Report2009.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1307359607255

https://wiki.helsinki.fi/download/attachments/70911363/StageQualityResearch_Summary2009.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1307359740024

https://wiki.helsinki.fi/download/attachments/70911363/StageQualityResearch_Summary2009.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1307359740024

8

1.6 Evaluation questions and material

The participating RCs answered the following evaluation questions which are presented according to the evaluation form. In addition, TUHAT RIS was used to provide the additional material as explained. For giving the feedback to the RCs, the panellists received the evaluation feedback form constructed in line with the evaluation questions:

1. Focus and quality of the RC’s research

Description of - the RC’s research focus. - the quality of the RC’s research (incl. key research questions and results) - the scientific significance of the RC’s research in the research field(s)

Identification of the ways to strengthen the focus and improve the quality of the RC’s research The additional material: TUHAT compilation of the RC’s publications, analysis of the RC’s publications data (provided by University of Leiden and the Helsinki University Library) A written feedback from the aspects of: scientific quality, scientific significance, societal impact, innovativeness

Strengths Areas of development Other remarks Recommendations

Numeric evaluation: OUTSTANDING (5), EXCELLENT (4), VERY GOOD (3), GOOD (2), SUFFICIENT (1) 2. Practises and quality of doctoral training

Organising of the doctoral training in the RC. Description of the RC’s principles for: - recruitment and selection of doctoral candidates - supervision of doctoral candidates - collaboration with faculties, departments/institutes, and potential graduate schools/doctoral programmes - good practises and quality assurance in doctoral training - assuring of good career perspectives for the doctoral candidates/fresh doctorates

Identification of the RC’s strengths and challenges related to the practises and quality of doctoral training, and the actions planned for their development.

The additional material: TUHAT compilation of the RC’s other scientific activities/supervision of doctoral dissertations A written feedback from the aspects of: processes and good practices related to leadership and management


Numeric evaluation: OUTSTANDING (5), EXCELLENT (4), VERY GOOD (3), GOOD (2), SUFFICIENT (1) 3. The societal impact of research and doctoral training

Description on how the RC interacts with and contributes to the society (collaboration with public, private and/or 3rd sector).

Identification of the ways to strengthen the societal impact of the RC’s research and doctoral training.

The additional material: TUHAT compilation of the RC’s other scientific activities. A written feedback from the aspects of: societal impact, national and international collaboration, innovativeness


Numeric evaluation: OUTSTANDING (5), EXCELLENT (4), VERY GOOD (3), GOOD (2), SUFFICIENT (1)

9

4. International and national (incl. intersectoral) research collaboration and researcher mobility Description of

- the RC’s research collaborations and joint doctoral training activities - how the RC has promoted researcher mobility

Identification of the RC’s strengths and challenges related to research collaboration and researcher mobility, and the actions planned for their development.

A written feedback from the aspects of: scientific quality, national and international collaboration Strengths Areas of development Other remarks Recommendations

Numeric evaluation: OUTSTANDING (5), EXCELLENT (4), VERY GOOD (3), GOOD (2), SUFFICIENT (1) 5. Operational conditions

Description of the operational conditions in the RC’s research environment (e.g. research infrastructure, balance between research and teaching duties).

Identification of the RC’s strengths and challenges related to operational conditions, and the actions planned for their development.

A written feedback from the aspects of: processes and good practices related to leadership and management


6. Leadership and management in the researcher community

Description of - the execution and processes of leadership in the RC - how the management-related responsibilities and roles are distributed in the RC - how the leadership- and management-related processes support

- high quality research - collaboration between principal investigators and other researchers in the RC the RC’s research focus - strengthening of the RC’s know-how

Identification of the RC’s strengths and challenges related to leadership and management, and the actions planned for developing the processes

7. External competitive funding of the RC

The RCs were asked to provide information of such external competitive funding, where: - the funding decisions have been made during 1.1.2005-31.12.2010, and - the administrator of the funding is/has been the University of Helsinki

On the e-form the RCs were asked to provide: 1) The relevant funding source(s) from a given list (Academy of Finland/Research Council, TEKES/The Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation , EU, ERC, foundations, other national funding organisations, other international funding organisations), and 2)The total sum of funding which the organisation in question had decided to allocate to the RCs members during 1.1.2005–31.12.2010.

Competitive funding reported in the text is also to be considered when evaluating this point. A written feedback from the aspects of: scientific quality, scientific significance, societal impact, innovativeness, future significance


8. The RC’s strategic action plan for 2011–2013

RC’s description of their future perspectives in relation to research and doctoral training. A written feedback from the aspects of: scientific quality, scientific significance, societal Impact, processes and good practices related to leadership and management, national and international collaboration, innovativeness, future significance

Strengths Areas of development

10

Other remarks Recommendations

9. Evaluation of the category of the RC in the context of entity of the evaluation material (1-8) The RC’s fitness to the chosen participation category A written feedback evaluating the RC’s fitness to the chosen participation category


Numeric evaluation: OUTSTANDING (5), EXCELLENT (4), VERY GOOD (3), GOOD (2), SUFFICIENT (1) 10. Short description of how the RC members contributed the compilation of the stage 2 material Comments on the compilation of evaluation material 11. How the UH’s focus areas are presented in the RC’s research? Comments if applicable 12. RC-specific main recommendations based on the previous questions 1–11 13. RC-specific conclusions

1.7 Evaluation criteria

The panellists were expected to give evaluative and analytical feedback to each evaluation question according to their aspects in order to describe and justify the quality of the submitted material. In addition, the evaluation feedback was asked to be pointed out the level of the performance according to the following classifications:

outstanding (5) excellent (4) very good (3) good (2) sufficient (1)

Evaluation according to the criteria was to be made with thorough consideration of the entire

evaluation material of the RC in question. Finally, in questions 1-4 and 9, the panellists were expected to classify their written feedback into one of the provided levels (the levels included respective descriptions, ‘criteria’). Some panels used decimals in marks. The descriptive level was interpreted according to the integers and not rounding up the decimals by the editors.

Description of criteria levels Question 1 – FOCUS AND QUALITY OF THE RC’S RESEARCH Classification: Criteria (level of procedures and results)

Outstanding quality of procedures and results (5) Outstandingly strong research, also from international perspective. Attracts great international interest with a wide impact, including publications in leading journals and/or monographs published by leading international publishing houses. The research has world leading qualities. The research focus, key research questions scientific significance, societal impact and innovativeness are of outstanding quality.

In cases where the research is of a national character and, in the judgement of the evaluators, should remain so, the concepts of ”international attention” or ”international impact” etc. in the grading criteria above may be replaced by ”international comparability”.

11

Operations and procedures are of outstanding quality, transparent and shared in the community. The improvement of research and other efforts are documented and operations and practices are in alignment with the documentation. The ambition to develop the community together is of outstanding quality.

Excellent quality of procedures and results (4)

Research of excellent quality. Typically published with great impact, also internationally. Without doubt, the research has a leading position in its field in Finland.

Operations and procedures are of excellent quality, transparent and shared in the community. The improvement of research and other efforts are documented and operations and practices are to large extent in alignment with the documentation. The ambition to develop the community together is of excellent quality.

Very good quality of procedures and results (3)

The research is of such very good quality that it attracts wide national and international attention.

Operations and procedures are of very good quality, transparent and shared in the community. The improvement of research and other efforts are documented and operations and practices are to large extent in alignment with the documentation. The ambition to develop the community together is of very good quality.

Good quality of procedures and results (2)

Good research attracting mainly national attention but possessing international potential, extraordinarily high relevance may motivate good research.

Operations and procedures are of good quality, shared occasionally in the community. The improvement of research and other efforts are occasionally documented and operations and practices are to large extent in alignment with the documentation. The ambition to develop the community together is of good quality.

Sufficient quality of procedures and results (1)

In some cases the research is insufficient and reports do not gain wide circulation or do not have national or international attention. Research activities should be revised.

Operations and procedures are of sufficient quality, shared occasionally in the community. The improvement of research and other efforts are occasionally documented and operations and practices are to some extent in alignment with the documentation. The ambition to develop the community together is of sufficient quality.

Question 2 – DOCTORAL TRAINING Question 3 – SOCIETAL IMPACT Question 4 – COLLABORATION

Classification: Criteria (level of procedures and results)

Outstanding quality of procedures and results (5)

Procedures are of outstanding quality, transparent and shared in the community. The practices and quality of doctoral training/societal impact/international and national collaboration/leadership and management are documented and operations and practices are in alignment with the documentation. The ambition to develop the community together is of outstanding quality. The procedures and results are regularly evaluated and the feedback has an effect on the planning.

Excellent quality of procedures and results (4)

Procedures are of excellent quality, transparent and shared in the community. The practices and quality of doctoral training/societal impact/international and national collaboration/leadership and management are documented and operations and practices are to large extent in alignment with the documentation. The ambition to develop the community together is of excellent quality. The procedures and outcomes are evaluated and the feedback has an effect on the planning.

Very good quality of procedures and results (3)

Procedures are of very good quality, transparent and shared in the community. The practices and quality of doctoral training/societal impact/international and national collaboration/leadership and

12

management are documented and operations and practices are to large extent in alignment with the documentation. The ambition to develop the community together is of very good quality.

Good quality of procedures and results (2)

Procedures are of good quality, shared occasionally in the community. The practices and quality of doctoral training/societal impact/international and national collaboration/leadership and management are documented and operations and practices are to large extent in alignment with the documentation. The ambition to develop the community together is of good quality.

Sufficient quality of procedures and results (1)

Procedures are of sufficient quality, transparent and shared in the community. The practices and quality of doctoral training/societal impact/international and national collaboration/leadership and management are occasionally documented and operations and practices are to some extent in alignment with the documentation. The ambition to develop the community together is of sufficient quality.

Question 9 – CATEGORY

Participation category – fitness for the category chosen

The choice and justification for the chosen category below should be reflected in the RC’s responses to the evaluation questions 1–8.

1. The research of the participating community represents the international cutting edge in its field. 2. The research of the participating community is of high quality, but the community in its present

composition has yet to achieve strong international recognition or a clear break-through. 3. The research of the participating community is distinct from mainstream research, and the special

features of the research tradition in the field must be considered in the evaluation. The research is of high quality and has great significance and impact in its field. However, the generally used research evaluation methods do not necessarily shed sufficient light on the merits of the research.

4. The research of the participating community represents an innovative opening. A new opening can be an innovative combination of research fields, or it can be proven to have a special social, national or international demand or other significance. Even if the researcher community in its present composition has yet to obtain proof of international success, its members can produce convincing evidence of the high level of their previous research.

5. The research of the participating community has a highly significant societal impact. The participating researcher community is able to justify the high social significance of its research. The research may relate to national legislation, media visibility or participation in social debate, or other activities promoting social development and human welfare. In addition to having societal impact, the research must be of a high standard.

An example of outstanding fitness for category choice (5) 7

The RC’s representation and argumentation for the chosen category were convincing. The RC recognized its real capacity and apparent outcomes in a wider context to the research communities. The specific character of the RC was well-recognized and well stated in the responses. The RC fitted optimally for the category.

Outstanding (5) Excellent (4) Very good (3) Good (2) Sufficient (1)

The above-mentioned definition of outstanding was only an example in order to assist the panellists in the positioning of the classification. There was no exact definition for the category fitness.

7 The panels discussed the category fitness and made the final conclusions of the interpretation of it.

13

1.8 Timetable of the evaluation

The main timetable of the evaluation: 1. Registration November 2010 2. Submission of self-evaluation materials January–February 2011 3. External peer review May–September 2011 4. Published reports March–April 2012

- University level public report - RC specific reports

The entire evaluation was implemented during the university’s strategy period 2010–2012. The preliminary results were available for the planning of the following strategy period in late autumn 2011. The evaluation reports will be published in March/April 2012. More detailed time schedule is published in the University report.

1.9 Evaluation feedback – consensus of the entire panel

The panellists evaluated all the RC-specific material before the meetings in Helsinki and mailed the draft reports to the evaluation office. The latest interim versions were on-line available to all the panellists on the Wiki-sites. In September 2011, in Helsinki the panels discussed the material, revised the first draft reports and decided the final numeric evaluation. After the meetings in Helsinki, the panels continued working and finalised the reports before the end of November 2011. The final RC-specific reports are the consensus of the entire panel.

The evaluation reports were written by the panels independently. During the editing process, the evaluation office requested some clarifications from the panels when necessary. The tone and style in the reports were not harmonized in the editing process. All the reports follow the original texts written by the panels as far as it was possible.

The original evaluation material of the RCs, provided for the panellists is attached at the end of the report. It is essential to notice that the exported lists of publications and other scientific activities depend how the data was stored in the TUHAT-RIS by the RCs.

15

2 Evaluation feedback

2.1 Focus and quality of the RC’s research

Description of the RC’s research focus the quality of the RC’s research (incl. key research questions and results) the scientific significance of the RC’s research in the research field(s)

Identification of the ways to strengthen the focus and improve the quality of the RC’s research ASPECTS: Scientific quality, scientific significance, societal impact, innovativeness Strengths The acronym ILLC stands for “Interfaces between Language, Literature and Culture”, and the interdisciplinarity of the RC’s research is a strong point. The PIs have various combinations of research in language, translation, literature and culture, and can establish research cooperation beyond their own disciplines and cooperate and discuss projects relating to such combinations. ILLC can build on existing cooperation among its members as well as on the members’ existing national and international networks.

The RC is innovative in its interdisciplinarity, committing to a collaboration across language-related fields that some language departments profess to do but very seldom put into practice. Areas of development The various subjects of the department intend to establish more synergy in teaching.

Numeric evaluation: 4 (Excellent)

2.2 Practises and quality of doctoral training

Organising of the doctoral training in the RC. Description of the RC’s principles for: recruitment and selection of doctoral candidates supervision of doctoral candidates collaboration with faculties, departments/institutes, and potential graduate schools/doctoral

programmes good practises and quality assurance in doctoral training assuring of good career perspectives for the doctoral candidates/fresh doctorates

Identification of the RC’s strengths and challenges related to the practises and quality of doctoral training, and the actions planned for their development.

Additional material: TUHAT compilation of the RC’s other scientific activities/supervision of doctoral dissertations

ASPECTS: Processes and good practices related to leadership and management

Strengths The practices and quality of doctoral training are well documented. The RC participates in two leading national graduate schools, Langnet and the Finnish Graduate School of Literary Studies, and by the latter has gained membership in PhDnet, a network of six leading universities in Europe. At least four doctoral theses supervised by the PIs and of good quality were published in the period under review. Areas of development The Department of Modern Languages to which ILLC is affiliated plans to follow suit in providing more joint courses and seminars, also with teachers from different subjects on particular topics (e.g. thematic seminars on literature and culture) in order to give doctoral training more structure. This is a good idea.

16

Other remarks It is stated in the self-evaluation that ten doctoral theses were published during the period, but we have only found four, all supervised by Bo Pettersson.


2.3 The societal impact of research and doctoral training

Description on how the RC interacts with and contributes to the society (collaboration with public, private and/or 3rd sector).

Identification of the ways to strengthen the societal impact of the RC’s research and doctoral training. Additional material: TUHAT compilation of the RC’s other scientific activities.

ASPECTS: Societal impact, national and international collaboration, innovativeness Strengths Collaboration with public consists of public seminars, popularising articles and media appearances, that serve a large segment of the population with an interest in language, literature and culture. Areas of development The comments offered on this refer to interdisciplinarity and are rather vague. Other remarks The publication data list reveals that as many as 12 articles have been published in Helsingin Sanomat, Finland’s biggest daily newspaper, read by the general public. This indicates significant endeavour in the sphere of impact. Recommendations Consolidate considerable existing public engagement.

Numeric evaluation: 3 (Very good)

2.4 International and national (incl. intersectoral) research collaboration and researcher mobility

Description of the RC’s research collaborations and joint doctoral training activities how the RC has promoted researcher mobility

Identification of the RC’s strengths and challenges related to research collaboration and researcher mobility, and the actions planned for their development.

ASPECTS: Scientific quality, national and international collaboration Strengths The RC has well established extensive national and international networks for collaboration in research and doctoral training. These are mainly European, although there is also one American link. Recommendations Since research on translation is implied in the profile of this RC, it could profit from collaboration with RC TraST.


17

2.5 Operational conditions


Identification of the RC’s strengths and challenges related to operational conditions, and the actions planned for their development.

ASPECTS: Processes and good practices related to leadership and management Strengths The ILLC PIs have positions at the university and thus the facilities needed, and most of them work in the same building, which facilitates close daily contact. Other remarks This section of the evaluation features some very cogent comments about the challenges facing research in this RC and the teaching/research balance is central to these. As for most RCs, the PIs have comparatively little time for research. The RC might continue to produce good work for popular outlets as well as small amounts of theoretical and interdisciplinary work whilst carrying heavy teaching loads. However, if the research is to maintain excellence and aspire to outstanding status then more investment in research time is needed. Sabbaticals for (at least) PIs would be required. Recommendations The RC should clearly state its critics against the Finnish university policy of unplanned postgraduate intake, which entails that not all postgraduate students have funding.

University of Helsinki ought to address the teaching/research balance; consider comments on the Swedish model for allocating PhD candidates.

2.6 Leadership and management in the researcher community

Description of the execution and processes of leadership in the RC how the management-related responsibilities and roles are distributed in the RC how the leadership- and management-related processes support

high quality research collaboration between principal investigators and other researchers in the RC the RC’s research focus strengthening of the RC’s know-how

Identification of the RC’s strengths and challenges related to leadership and management, and the actions planned for developing the processes

ASPECTS: Processes and good practices related to leadership and management Strengths The promptly formed board of directors consisting of leading professors and PIs is a strong point. And with the addition of a smaller executive committee with a representative from each of the three main subjects, leadership is very well organised. Most PIs also have extensive administrative experience which will be useful for future challenges of organization and implementation.

The description of leadership betrays the fact that the RC is in its infancy. This might work as a strength since it will be more flexible in a period of academic change. It should be applauded for its attempt to introduce a thoroughly democratic structure.

18

Areas of development One of the areas ICCL will develop is in helping doctoral students form academically fruitful relations between themselves and to PIs outside their primary fields.

This is one part of a good attempt to forge an environment of research (as opposed to individual supervision circumstances). Recommendations Consolidate the leadership structure by means of outward display as detailed in the final paragraph of 6 in the evaluation.

2.7 External competitive funding of the RC

• The RCs were asked to provide information of such external competitive funding, where: • the funding decisions have been made during 1.1.2005–31.12.2010, and • the administrator of the funding is/has been the University of Helsinki

• On the e-form the RCs were asked to provide: 1) The relevant funding source(s) from a given list (Academy of Finland/Research Council, TEKES/The Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation, EU, ERC, foundations, other national funding organisations, other international funding organizations), and 2) The total sum of funding which the organisation in question had decided to allocate to the RCs members during 1.1.2005–31.12.2010.

Competitive funding reported in the text is also to be considered when evaluating this point. ASPECTS: Scientific quality, scientific significance, societal impact, innovativeness and future significance Strengths The amount of funding and its distribution over various funding sources is a definite strong point.

Over 1.1 million Euros raised from European funds. That is 210,000 Euros per year for the period of assessment. That is a considerable sum.

2.8 The RC’s strategic action plan for 2011–2013

• RC’s description of their future perspectives in relation to research and doctoral training. ASPECTS: Scientific quality, scientific significance, societal Impact, processes and good practices related to leadership and management, national and international collaboration, innovativeness, future significance Strengths ILLC is planning to deepen its cooperation in research, supervision and teaching, in organizing seminars and conferences, and publishing research jointly. The RC also presents an elaborated preliminary timetable for the coming three years, containing seminars (3-4/term), internal and international conferences, collecting papers, editing and publishing a final volume in 2013. In defining these concrete goals, this timetable represents a strong point.

The conferences will provide a great deal of help in consolidating the profile of the RC. Other remarks The RC might have been a little more ambitious in the plan, perhaps identifying distinct research projects, possible applications for funding and research outputs. Recommendations Consider a more extensive strategic plan.

19

2.9 Evaluation of the category of the RC in the context of entity of the evaluation material (1-8)

The RC’s fitness to the chosen participation category. Category 3. The research of the participating community is distinct from mainstream research, and the special features of the research tradition in the field must be considered in the evaluation. Strengths Participation category 3 is consistent with the RC’s interdisciplinary research perspective, which is innovative.


2.10 Short description of how the RC members contributed the compilation of the stage 2 material

The project leader presented a draft of the report for all to comment on. The various points were discussed and some suggestions were taken on board for the final version.

There seems to be a fairly even distribution of contributions; that is, not just the PIs but also other RC members and doctoral candidates.

2.11 How the UH’s focus areas are presented in the RC’s research

Focus area 8: Language and culture

The RC places their research under the Focus area ”Language and culture”, which seems consistent with the given description.

2.12 RC-specific main recommendations

The RC ought to consolidate considerable existing public engagement. Since research on translation is implied in the profile of this RC, it could profit from collaboration

with RC TraST. The RC should clearly state its critics against the Finnish university policy of unplanned

postgraduate intake, which entails that not all postgraduate students have funding. University of Helsinki ought to address the teaching/research balance; consider comments on the

Swedish model for allocating PhD candidates. The RC should consolidate the leadership structure by means of outward display as detailed in

the final paragraph of 6 in the evaluation. The RC ought to consider a more extensive strategic plan.

2.13 RC-specific conclusions

This recently created RC is innovative in its interdisciplinarity, committing to a collaboration across language-related fields (literature, language, translation). In order to maintain the excellence of its research and support its aspirations to outstanding status, more investment in research time is needed.

21

3 Appendices

A. Original evaluation material a. Registration material – Stage 1 b. Answers to evaluation questions – Stage 2 c. List of publications d. List of other scientific activities

B. Bibliometric analyses a. Analysis provided by CWTS/University of Leiden b. Analysis provided by Helsinki University Library (66 RCs)

International evaluation of research and doctoral training at the University of Helsinki 2005-2010

RC-SPECIFIC MATERIAL FOR THE PEER REVIEW

NAME OF THE RESEARCHER COMMUNITY: Interfaces between Language, Literature and Culture (ILLC)

LEADER OF THE RESEARCHER COMMUNITY: Professor Bo Pettersson, Department of Modern Languages/English Philology

RC-SPECIFIC MATERIAL FOR THE PEER REVIEW:

Material submitted by the RC at stages 1 and 2 of the evaluation - STAGE 1 material: RC’s registration form (incl. list of RC participants in an excel table) - STAGE 2 material: RC’s answers to evaluation questions

TUHAT compilations of the RC members’ publications 1.1.2005-31.12.2010

TUHAT compilations of the RC members’ other scientific activities 1.1.2005-31.12.2010

UH Library analysis of publications data 1.1.2005-31.12.2010 – results of UH Library analysis will be available by the end of June 2011

NB! Since Web of Science(WoS)-based bibliometrics does not provide representative results for most RCs representing humanities, social sciences and computer sciences, the publications of these RCs will be analyzed by the UH Library (results available by the end of June, 2011)

1

INTERNATIONAL EVALUATION OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING AT THE UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI

RC-SPECIFIC STAGE 1 MATERIAL (registration form)

Name: Pettersson, Bo

E-mail: [email protected]

Phone: -23417 / 040-8376636

Affiliation: Department of Modern Languages/English Philology

Street address: Unioninkatu 40

Name of the participating RC (max. 30 characters): Interfaces between Language, Literature and Culture

Acronym for the participating RC (max. 10 characters): ILLC

Description of the operational basis in 2005-2010 (eg. research collaboration, joint doctoral training activities) on which the RC was formed (MAX. 2200 characters with spaces): Foreign language departments in most European universities do research in the language, literature and culture/s where the languages are spoken. However, very seldom is the research (as well as the supervision and teaching) integrated in any meaningful way. The units of Department of Modern Languages that ILLC is mainly based on – English Philology, French Philology and Russian Language and Literature – have for some years worked on integrating various aspects of language, literature and culture in ways that reflect that the best of an established integrated philological tradition can be developed into up-to-date combinations of linguistics and literary/cultural studies. For instance, as Acting Head of English, in 2009 Pettersson instituted a line combing linguistics and literature in MA studies called "Interfaces", which has been popular among students.

The ILLC members have collaborated for a long time. For over a decade Pettersson and Taavitsainen have held joint postgraduate seminars on language and literature; Pesonen and Pettersson have worked together under the auspices of The Finnish Graduate School of Literary Studies; and Hellman and Pettersson have combined forces in the interdisciplinary Swedish Literature Society’s Literature Committee. Also, Helkkula, Hellman, Pesonen and Pettersson instituted a joint postgraduate interdisciplinary seminar in 2009, which meets about three times a term. As Director of the Graduate School, in 2005 Pettersson started collaboration with Professor Ansgar Nünning, Director of the International Graduate Centre for the Study of Culture (GCSC) at University of Giessen. This has developed into membership in PhDnet, a network of six leading universities in Europe (U of Helsinki is member through the Graduate School). Russian Language and Literature has an internationally well-known tradition of joint seminars with Tartu University since 1987, hosting 50-60 participants from more than ten countries. So far Studia Russica Helsingensia et Tartuensia consists of 13 volumes. ILLC can build on existing cooperation among its members at all stages (I-IV) as well as on the members’ existing national and international networks.

1 RESPONSIBLE PERSON

2 DESCRIPTION OF THE PARTICIPATING RESEARCHER COMMUNITY (RC)

2



Main scientific field of the RC’s research: humanities

RC's scientific subfield 1: Humanities, Multidisciplinary

RC's scientific subfield 2: Language and Linguistics Theory

RC's scientific subfield 3: Literary Theory and Criticism

RC's scientific subfield 4: Literature

Other, if not in the list: Translation studies

Participation category: 3. Research of the participating community is distinct from mainstream research, and the special features of the research tradition in the field must be considered in the evaluation

Justification for the selected participation category (MAX. 2200 characters with spaces): ILLC is based on existing research carried out in the various subjects in the Department of Modern Languages. The ILLC researchers at all stages in the department combine the study of language, literature and culture. What the preparatory work for ILLC (outlined in 2) has done is to pool the various researchers and their projects. ILLC attempts to broaden and institutionalise this synergy by postgraduate seminars (supervision and research) as well as joint undergraduate courses, as being planned in the current syllabus renewal (teaching). Thus, the research of ILLC is not distinct from mainstream research as such, but as a concerted effort bridging the many areas of study existing in a language department it represents an unusual degree of interdisciplinary study. The areas covered are central ones in the humanities: language in literature, stylistics, literary and cultural studies, narrative studies, discourse analysis, pragmatics, corpus linguistics, translation studies, multimodal communication. What ILLC attempts by pooling existing resources and developing the cooperation in the RC and its considerable national and international networks is to show that it benefits all participating subjects and researchers at all stages. In other words, interdisciplinary studies go beyond the rather circumscribed disciplinary research carried out at most departments in the Faculty of Arts by situating its research in a more holistic framework of human communication in relation to the arts and society.

Public description of the RC's research and doctoral training (MAX. 2200 characters with spaces): The Principal Investigators of ILLC have in different ways sought to combine elements of language (1a), incl. translation (1b), literature (2) and culture (3) in their research and teaching: Pettersson (has mainly combined 2 and 3 but also 1b), Shackleton (2 and 3), Swirski (1b, 2 and 3), Taavitsainen (1a and 2), Tanskanen (1a and 3), Ventola (1a and 3); Helkkula (1a and 2), Tuomarla (1a and 2); Hellman (1b, 2 and 3), Könönen (2 and 3), Obatnin (2 and 3), Pesonen (2 and 3), Suni (1b, 2 and 3). Together they cover all the main areas of ILLC outlined above in 4 and have in different ways built bridges between the study of language, translation, literature and culture, not least by heading various research projects. What they have

3 SCIENTIFIC FIELDS OF THE RC

4 RC'S PARTICIPATION CATEGORY

5 DESCRIPTION OF THE RC'S RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING

3



in common is a contextual understanding of communication and the different forms it takes. Also, many have a particular interest in studying how that communication often is couched in various modes, narrative or other. In this way, both in terms of primary material and the methods employed, the PIs have the common ground necessary for the cooperation in research, supervision and teaching to be functional and rewarding.

All PIs supervise doctoral students (many of whom have double advisors in order to guarantee the continuity and diversity in supervision), and the doctoral projects are as multifarious as the combined research of the PIs. In this respect, the aim of ILLC is to guarantee that the supervisees receive feedback from peers as well as more advanced researchers (stages II-IV), so that interdisciplinary aspects beyond the competence of the supervisors are also discussed. By cooperation within the department in terms of research, supervision and teaching as well as by joint seminars and conferences (national and international), the advanced researchers seek to provide useful forums and sounding boards for the future PhDs. In this way, postgraduate students can present their findings for different kinds of audiences even while they are working on their PhD theses – and thus even at stage I become members of the research community at large.

Significance of the RC's research and doctoral training for the University of Helsinki (MAX. 2200 characters with spaces): By the various subjects represented and the many kinds of cooperation offered, ILLC benefits the Department of Modern Languages and the university at large. The participants of ILLC are teachers and researchers mainly from English Philology, French Philology and Russian Language and Literature, but also from English Translation, Russian Translation and the Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies. ILLC has already instituted considerable cooperation in terms of research and supervision, and in the current syllabus reform the various subjects of the department intend to establish more synergy in teaching. For instance, English Philology and Translation are instituting joint teaching in Basic Studies; English Philology plans on extending the various successful lines of its MA studies, including the Interfaces line, to Intermediate Studies; and more courses in Intermediate and Advanced Studies in all subjects will be open for all students at the department. This provides students with a firmer and more holistic grasp of the aims and methods of the humanities as well as a substantial interdisciplinary basis for future PhD students.

The joint interdisciplinary seminars have already become rather popular among the PhD students, since they receive comments on their projects not only from their own supervisors but also from a larger pool of scholars and peers. What is more, in their various combinations of research in language, translation, literature and culture, the PIs can establish research cooperation beyond their own disciplines. In other words, scholars working on, say, language in literature, translation and culture or literature and culture can cooperate and discuss projects relating to such combinations. In this way, the research, supervision and teaching in the department benefit from the ILLC members’ scholarly work and research administration. The University of Helsinki also profits beyond the departmental level by the ILLC’s interdisciplinary efforts in terms of seminars serving the other departments in the human sciences and members of the Helsinki Collegium as well as by public seminars, popularising articles and media appearances.

Keywords: Linguistics; literary studies; narrative studies; cultural studies; translation studies; interdisciplinarity; English, French, Russian

4



Justified estimate of the quality of the RC's research and doctoral training at national and international level during 2005-2010 (MAX. 2200 characters with spaces): The publications and other activities of the members of ILLC speak for themselves and show that even in their respective fields the members have received much national and international recognition. For instance, in the previous research assessment ILLC’s three main subjects excelled: English Philology was given the highest possible grade (7 out of 7), so was Russian (7/7), closely followed by Romance Languages (6/7). The quantity of the research produced by ILLC members is rather extraordinary, not least in the light of the fact that most of the members at stages II-IV are teachers and administrators as well as researchers. The forums in which their works are published (a high percentage of which is peer-reviewed) vouch for the quality of the work, since publishers include Cambridge UP, Palgrave Macmillan, Benjamins, Mouton de Gruyter, McGill-Queen’s UP, Routledge and Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie (a leading Russian publisher in the humanities). ILLC members are also editors and board members of numerous international journals. On a national level, ILLC’s PIs are board members of the leading national graduate schools in the humanities (especially Langnet and The Finnish Graduate School of Literary Studies) and publish in the foremost national forums, such as Gaudeamus/Helsinki UP and Academia scientiarum Fennica.

The doctoral training of the ILLC members has been on an unusually high level, both quantitatively and qualitatively. Pesonen and Pettersson alone have supervised ten (6+4) published doctoral theses in the period under review. As for quality, all doctoral theses submitted received one of the three highest grades (out of seven), with one exception (which received the middle grade).

As the number of current doctoral students suggests (and please note that ILLC only lists the most active ones), the positive trend continues, which is rather unusual in the humanities of today. The topics of the doctoral projects also cover an impressive range and attest to the versatility and truly interdisciplinary nature of the research carried out under the auspices of ILLC.

Comments on how the RC's scientific productivity and doctoral training should be evaluated (MAX. 2200 characters with spaces): The quality and quantity of the research produced by ILLC members may be assessed by received methods in the humanities. The number of publications activities can be counted according to the cataloguing in use by TUHAT, thus establishing the amount and quality of ILLC research, for instance, in terms of papers and books accepted by international publishers and peer-reviewed journals. However, the expert panelists could benefit from reading some of the publications submitted, since non-peer reviewed papers may also be of a high standard. All the panelists suggested by ILLC are all multi-disciplinary and multi-lingual (that is, all are competent in at least three of the following languages: English, Russian, French and German) so as to be able to assess its scholarship, which combines many disciplines and is written in a number of languages.

The results of the doctoral training are evident when measuring the number of doctors and the grades received for the doctoral theses. Also, since ILLC is interdisciplinary in character the panelists may also

6 QUALITY OF RC'S RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING

5



consider the versatility of the various doctoral projects and the fact that the PhD candidates actually write their research in the respective language in which it is published.

As the publication forums of its members may imply, ILLC will continue to make use of renowned international publishers and journals for their monographs, editions and papers. Since the various languages mainly employed by ILLC scholars (especially English, French and Russian, but also Finnish and Swedish) require different channels for their publications, the ILLC members are free to use the most suitable academic publishers to reach their respective target audience. If ILLC is successful in this research assessment and receives funding, it aims to publish a joint edition of its current research.

LIST OF RC MEMBERS

NAME OF THE RESEARCHER COMMUNITY: ILLCRC-LEADER B. PetterssonCATEGORY 3

Last name First name

PI-status (TUHAT,

29.11.2010)Title of research and teaching personnel Affiliation

1 Berazhny Ivan I Doctoral candidate UH2 Helenius Marja-Liisa I Doctoral candidate UH3 Helkkula Mervi x IV Professor UH4 Hellman Ben x IV Professor UH5 Hiippala Tuomo I Doctoral candidate UH6 Huotari Léa I Doctoral candidate UH7 Hyvärinen Jussi I Doctoral candidate UH8 Jakovleva Natalia I Doctoral candidate UH9 Kraenker Sabine I Doctoral candidate UH

10 Kuivalainen Päivi I Doctoral candidate UH11 Käkelä Jari I Doctoral candidate UH12 Könönen Maija x IV Professor UH / U of Eastern Finland13 Lagus Timo I Doctoral candidate UH14 Obatnin Gennadi x III Senior Researcher UH15 Pakkala-Weckström Mari III Senior Researcher UH16 Pesonen Pekka x IV Professor UH17 Pettersson Bo x IV Professor UH18 Riippa Anne I Doctoral candidate UH19 Shackleton Mark x III Senior Researcher UH20 Sklar Howard II Postdoctoral Researcher UH21 Suni Timo x III Senior Researcher UH22 Swirski Peter IV Professor UH23 Taavitsainen Irma x IV Professor UH24 Tanskanen Sanna-Kaisa x IV Professor UH25 Therman Cecilia I Doctoral candidate UH26 Tuomarla Ulla x III Senior Researcher UH27 Ventola Eija IV Professor UH / Aalto University28 Vesanen Jenni I Doctoral candidate UH29 Vänskä Elina I Doctoral candidate UH30 Väätänen Päivi I Doctoral candidate UH31 Westerlund Fredrik A. I Doctoral candidate UH32 Wikström Tiina I Doctoral candidate UH

1


RC-SPECIFIC STAGE 2 MATERIAL

Name of the RC’s responsible person: PETTERSSON, Bo

E-mail of the RC’s responsible person: [email protected]

Name and acronym of the participating RC: Interfaces between Language, Literature and Culture, ILLC or Interfaces

The RC’s research represents the following key focus area of UH: 8. Kieli ja kulttuuri – Language and culture

Comments for selecting/not selecting the key focus area: The focus of ILLC is the very interaction between language and culture. In our RC, by the research focus in language we mean (1a) linguistics and (1b) translation studies and by the research focus in culture, we mean (2) literary studies and (3) cultural studies in a broad sense. What is more, ILLC covers two of the three focal areas in the strategy of the Faculty of Arts in the years 2010-2012: Cultural and linguistic diversity and Language and interaction. Distinctive of ILLC is that its participants do research by combining two or more of the areas designated as (1a), (1b), (2) and (3). All of the participants in ILLC have been or are being trained in at least two of the above areas and are thus able to combine them in interdisciplinary ways. This combination of disciplines often leads to results that are larger than the sum of its parts, which is especially important in language subjects, where language and culture often at best are integrated.

Description of the RC’s research focus, the quality of the RC’s research (incl. key research questions and results) and the scientific significance of the RC’s research for the research field(s).

Foreign language departments in most European universities do research in the language, literature and culture/s where the languages are spoken. However, very seldom is the research (as well as the supervision and teaching) integrated in any meaningful way. The units of Department of Modern Languages that ILLC is mainly based on – English Philology, French Philology and Russian Language and Literature – have for some years worked on integrating various aspects of language, literature and culture in ways that reflect the fact that the best of an established integrated philological tradition can be developed into up-to-date combinations of linguistics, translation studies and literary/cultural studies. For instance, as Acting Head of English, in 2009 Pettersson instituted a line combing linguistics, literature and culture in MA studies called "Interfaces", which has been popular among students. The ILLC members have collaborated for a long time. For over a decade Pettersson and Taavitsainen have held joint postgraduate seminars on language and literature; Pesonen and Pettersson have worked together under the auspices of The Finnish Graduate School of Literary Studies; and Hellman and Pettersson have combined forces in the interdisciplinary Swedish Literature Society’s Literary Studies Committee. Also, Helkkula, Hellman, Pesonen and Pettersson instituted a joint postgraduate interdisciplinary seminar in 2009, which meets about three times a term. As Director of the above-mentioned Graduate School, in 2005 Pettersson started collaboration with Professor Ansgar Nünning, Director of the International Graduate Centre for the Study of Culture (GCSC) at University of Giessen. This has developed into membership in PhDnet, a network of five leading universities in Europe (U of Helsinki is member through the Graduate School). Russian Language and Literature has an internationally well-known tradition of joint seminars with Tartu University since 1987, hosting 50-60 participants from more than ten countries. So far Studia Russica Helsingensia et Tartuensia consists of

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

1 FOCUS AND QUALITY OF RC'S RESEARCH (MAX. 8800 CHARACTERS WITH SPACES)

2



13 volumes. French Philology has cooperated with universities in France, especially Université Paris III (Sorbonne Nouvelle). ILLC can build on existing cooperation among its members at all stages (I-IV) as well as on the members’ existing national and international networks. ILLC is based on existing research carried out in the various subjects in the Department of Modern Languages. The ILLC researchers at all stages in the department combine the study of language, literature and culture. What the preparatory work for ILLC has done is to pool the various researchers and their projects. ILLC attempts to broaden and institutionalise this synergy by postgraduate seminars (supervision and research) as well as joint undergraduate courses, as is being planned in the current syllabus renewal (teaching). The research of ILLC is not distinct from mainstream research as such, but as a concerted effort bridging the many areas of study existing in a language department it represents an unusual degree of interdisciplinary study. The areas covered are central ones in the humanities: language in literature, stylistics, literary and cultural studies, narrative studies, discourse analysis, pragmatics, corpus linguistics, translation studies, multimodal communication. What ILLC attempts by pooling existing resources and developing the cooperation in the RC and its considerable national and international networks is to show that it benefits all participating subjects and researchers at all stages. In other words, interdisciplinary studies go beyond the rather circumscribed disciplinary research carried out at most departments in the Faculty of Arts by situating its research in a more holistic framework of human communication. The Principal Investigators of ILLC have in different ways sought to combine elements of language (1a), incl. translation (1b), literature (2) and culture (3) in their research and teaching: Pettersson (has mainly combined 2 and 3 but also 1b), Shackleton (2 and 3), Swirski (1b, 2 and 3), Taavitsainen (1a and 2), Tanskanen (1a and 3), Ventola (1a and 3); Helkkula (1a and 2), Tuomarla (1a, 1b and 2); Hellman (1b, 2 and 3), Könönen (2 and 3), Obatnin (2 and 3), Pesonen (2 and 3), Suni (1b, 2 and 3). Together they cover all the main areas of ILLC outlined above and have in different ways built bridges between the study of language, translation, literature and culture. What they have in common is a contextual understanding of communication and the different forms it takes. Also, many have a particular interest in studying how that communication often is couched in various and multiple modes, narrative or other. In this way, both in terms of primary material and the methods employed, the PIs have the common ground necessary for the cooperation in research, supervision and teaching to be functional and rewarding. The publications and other activities of the members of ILLC speak for themselves and show that even in their respective fields the members have received much national and international recognition. For instance, in the previous research assessment ILLC’s three main subjects excelled: English Philology was given the highest possible grade (7 out of 7), so was Russian (7/7), closely followed by Romance Languages (6/7). The quantity of the research produced by ILLC members is rather extraordinary, not least in the light of the fact that most of the members at stages II-IV are teachers and administrators as well as researchers. The forums in which their works are published (a high percentage of which is peer-reviewed) vouch for the quality of the work, since publishers include Cambridge UP, Palgrave Macmillan, Benjamins, Mouton de Gruyter, McGill-Queen’s UP, Routledge and Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie (a leading Russian publisher in the humanities). ILLC members are also editors and board members of numerous international journals. On a national level, ILLC’s PIs are board members of the leading national graduate schools in the humanities (especially Langnet and The Finnish Graduate School of Literary Studies) and publish in the foremost national forums, such as Gaudeamus/Helsinki UP and Academia scientiarum Fennica. Please note that much of the funding for research done by ILLC is not visible in item 7 (where only U of Helsinki funding is noted) but is briefly listed in item 2.

3



The quality and quantity of the research produced by ILLC members may be assessed by received methods in the humanities. The number of publications activities can be counted according to the cataloguing in use by TUHAT, thus establishing the amount and quality of ILLC research, for instance, in terms of papers and books accepted by international publishers and peer-reviewed journals. However, the expert panelists could benefit from reading some of the publications submitted, since non-peer reviewed papers may also be of a high standard. All the panelists suggested by ILLC are all multi-disciplinary and multi-lingual (that is, all are competent in at least three of the following languages: English, Russian, French and German) so as to be able to assess its scholarship, which combines many disciplines and is written in a number of languages. In their respective fields, the ILLC researchers have contributed to answer key questions in the various fields mentioned above. The scientific significance in the various fields is hard to survey, but there is no doubt that taken together they have greatly furthered the understanding of the various ways in which language and culture interact.

Ways to strengthen the focus and improve the quality of the RC’s research.

The challenge ILLC faces is to further integrate the various approaches its researchers represent. This concerns all central academic areas: research, supervision and teaching. Having founded ILLC, the participants hope to promote collaboration in and between these areas, since the very existence of this RC will advance such goals. What used to be separate departmental traditions can thus be combined and contrasted in fruitful ways – and hopefully continue to create new combinations to strengthen scholarship in the humanities.

How is doctoral training organised in the RC? Description of the RC’s principles for recruitment and

selection of doctoral candidates, supervision of doctoral candidates, collaboration with faculties, departments/institutes, and potential graduate schools/doctoral programmes, good practises and quality assurance in doctoral training, and assuring good career perspectives for the doctoral candidates/fresh doctorates.

By the various subjects represented and the many kinds of cooperation offered, ILLC benefits the Department of Modern Languages and the university at large. The participants of ILLC are teachers and researchers mainly from English Philology, French Philology and Russian Language and Literature, but also from English Translation, Russian Translation and the Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies. ILLC has already instituted considerable cooperation in terms of research and supervision, and in the current syllabus reform the various subjects of the department intend to establish more synergy in teaching. For instance, English Philology and Translation are instituting joint teaching in Basic Studies; English Philology plans to extend the various successful lines of its MA studies, including the Interfaces line, to Intermediate Studies; and more courses in Intermediate and Advanced Studies in all subjects will be open for all students at the department. This provides students with a firmer and more holistic grasp of the aims and methods of the humanities as well as a substantial interdisciplinary basis for future PhD students. The recruitment of doctoral students is primarily based on factors, such as an impressive and feasible research plan, competent supervision available for the proposed topic, and a good track record in terms of previous exam grades and the grade for the MA thesis. In the present Finnish university system students apply for funding after a they have been accepted as doctoral students, which in practice has proved to be one of the main stumbling blocks, even for some gifted doctoral students (see also item 5,

2 PRACTISES AND QUALITY OF DOCTORAL TRAINING (MAX. 8800 CHARACTERS WITH SPACES)

4



last para. of first part). With ILLC in place, it would be easier for the Department of Modern Languages to more actively seek top students to recruit by, for instance, a flier where the department’s interdisciplinary resources and research are highlighted. All – or almost all – PIs supervise doctoral students (many of whom have double advisors in order to guarantee the continuity and diversity in supervision), and the doctoral projects are as multifarious as the combined research of the PIs. In this respect, the aim of ILLC is to guarantee that the supervisees receive feedback from peers as well as more advanced researchers (stages II-IV), so that interdisciplinary aspects beyond the competence of the supervisors are also discussed. By cooperation within the department in terms of research, supervision and teaching as well as by joint seminars and conferences (national and international), the senior scholars seek to provide useful forums and sounding boards for the future PhDs. In this way, postgraduate students can present their findings for different kinds of audiences even while they are working on their PhD theses – and thus even at stage I become members of the research community at large. The joint interdisciplinary seminars have already become rather popular among the PhD students, since they receive comments on their projects not only from their own supervisors but also from a larger pool of senior scholars and peers. What is more, in their various combinations of research in language, translation, literature and culture, the PIs can establish research cooperation beyond their own disciplines. In other words, scholars working on, say, language in literature, translation and culture, or literature and culture can cooperate and discuss projects relating to such combinations. In this way, the research, supervision and teaching in the department benefit from the ILLC members' scholarly work and research administration. Doctoral candidates are also encouraged to cooperate with or visit other departments beyond faculty borders within the University of Helsinki, in Finland and abroad. For instance, two of the participants from English Philology (Sklar and Therman) have greatly benefited from cooperation with Social Psychology at University of Helsinki as well as from leading international scholars in empirical literary studies; most of the participants from Russian Literature and Russian Translation have for years collaborated by joint sessions with Russian Literature at the universities of Tampere and Tartu in Estonia; and two participants from French (Riippa and Vänskä) have spent research periods at Université Paris III. ILLC goes on to encourage such cooperation and networking. The doctoral training of the ILLC members has been on an unusually high level, both quantitatively and qualitatively. Pesonen and Pettersson alone have supervised ten (6+4) published doctoral theses in the period under review. As for quality, all doctoral theses submitted received one of the three highest grades (out of seven), with one exception (which received the middle grade). As the number of current doctoral students suggests (and please note that ILLC only lists the most active ones), the positive trend continues, which is rather unusual in the humanities of today. The topics of the doctoral projects also cover an impressive range and attest to the versatility and truly interdisciplinary nature of the research carried out under the auspices of ILLC. In terms of publication, ILLC will continue to make use of renowned international publishers and journals for their monographs, editions and papers. Since the various languages mainly employed by ILLC scholars (especially English, French and Russian, but also Finnish and Swedish) require different channels for their publications, the ILLC members are free to use the most suitable academic publishers to reach their respective target audience. If ILLC is successful in this research assessment and receives funding, it aims to publish a joint edition of its current research (see item 8 for strategic action plan).

5



Much of the funding for doctoral students and to some extent post-doctorate scholars goes straight to the recipients and is thus not visible in the funding scheme in item 7. The number of funding institutions and the joint sum received by these sources is rather impressive: The Kone Foundation (21 600 e), The Ella and Georg Ehrnrooth Foundation (23 000 e), The Oskar Öflund Foundation (6 000 e), The Finnish Cultural Foundation (16 000 e), The Emil Aaltonen Foundation (c. 37 000 e),The Jenni and Antti Wihuri Foundation (37 000 e), The Niilo Helander Foundation (16 250 e), Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst (5 000 e), Université Paris III (650 e), in all c. 125 500 e. In 2005-2010 ILLC members have also had research funding from other universities, for instance, Tanskanen, Academy of Finland through U of Turku (c. 140 000 e) and Swirski, U of Hong Kong (c.100 000 e). Despite discouraging figures in national and international perspectives, the employment rate of the doctorates supervised by ILLC members continues to be high. One of the most likely reasons for this is that the supervisors have been able to infuse different kinds of interdisciplinary breadth in their future PhDs, who thus have a broader range of expertise to fall back upon when seeking employment.

RC’s strengths and challenges related to the practises and quality of doctoral training, and the actions planned for their development.

The various strengths have been portrayed above: interdisciplinary synergy on all levels and breadth of expertise. However, even though there is considerable cooperation in doctoral training, it could still be developed. The national graduate schools are doing a good job in providing some joint training for their doctoral students, and the Department of Modern Languages to which ILLC is affiliated plans to follow suit in providing more joint courses and seminars. As noted above, as well as the joint postgraduate seminar, we are also planning joint courses with teachers from different subjects on particular topics (e.g. thematic seminars on literature and culture, such as the differences between literary movements in different cultures, and on linguistics and culture, such as various kinds of multimodality). This would in part remedy the typical Finnish doctoral training in the humanities, which despite the graduate schools and recent reforms at the Faculty of Arts at University of Helsinki (see item 4, para. 3) has little structure and is still largely formed on an ad hoc basis.

Description of how the RC interacts with and contributes to the society (collaboration with public,

private and/or 3rd sector).

Starting from ILLC's immediate environment, it is fair to say that University of Helsinki profits beyond the departmental level by the ILLC's interdisciplinary efforts in terms of seminars serving other departments in the human sciences and members of the Helsinki Collegium. Beyond the home university, other universities benefit from the activities of ILLC and its members by cooperation and networking as well as by seminars and conferences to which scholars from universities in Finland and beyond are invited. As a matter of course, all ILLC participants also attend national and international conferences and in this way show the results of actual interdisciplinary scholarship. As for the general public, public seminars, popularising articles and media appearances serve a large segment of the population with an interest in language, literature and culture. However, the most important societal impact is done in two ways, the impact of which is not always recognized. First, the quality of the research carried out by scholars – in this case ILLC members – is what has the most significant impact on the society at large by its lasting value as scholarship on which future research can build. This scholarship is published in academic forums as well as more popular media and can thus shape the views of language and culture at large. Second, the PhDs who receive

3 SOCIETAL IMPACT OF RESEARCH AND DOCTORAL TRAINING (MAX. 4400 CHARACTERS WITH SPACES)

6



good training and top grades will be an asset to society in a variety of ways: many in academia, others in administration, publishing and other top cultural positions. By the versatility of training that ILLC provides, it has a societal impact on this country and ultimately on the world, since many PhDs publish in international forums or land positions abroad.

Ways to strengthen the societal impact of the RC’s research and doctoral training.

Once the cooperation within ILLC is strengthened, the research is bound to have a greater impact. If funded, ILLC can better implement teaching and supervisory strategies within the department as well as provide conferences and publish joint editions that will show how interdisciplinarity in the human sciences works in practice. In doctoral training, the greater methodological awareness of various ways of combining disciplines will lead to better scholarship and most likely to an even larger range of employment.

Description of the RC’s research collaborations and joint doctoral training activities and how the RC has promoted researcher mobility.

Perhaps the most significant collaborative efforts are every researcher's network of colleagues within Finland, in the Nordic countries and the rest of the world. As units, English, French and Russian have over thirty exchange agreements with universities abroad. But there is also long-standing cooperation, for English, with The International Graduate Centre for the Study of Culture (GCSC) at University of Giessen, later developed into PhDnet (including the universities in Giessen, Helsinki, Stockholm, Bergamo, Lisbon [Catholic U]); for French, especially Université Paris III; and for Russian, the universities of Tampere and Tartu. ILLC and its host institutions encourage its doctoral students to spend lengthy periods in academic institutions abroad, whose focus will strengthen and broaden their expertise. Nationally, the ILLC members are among the most active in their fields, not only as invited speakers but also as arrangers of conferences and seminars for Finnish and international scholars (see the TUHAT database). Attending such academic meetings is also part and parcel of the training of the training of the postgraduate students. The graduate schools in language and literature also serve not only their funded and affiliated students but also all postgraduate students in their fields. For more than a decade this has been an important part of the postgraduate studies for the units represented. The fact that most PIs have extensive national and international networks also helps postgraduate students to get to know top scholars in their respective field. What is more, in 2009 ILLC started a joint postgraduate seminar, which serves as a forum for interdisciplinary research projects among both staff and postgraduate students. The Faculty of Arts has also recently renewed its policies concerning postgraduate studies by supporting all its doctoral students through provision of courses on a wide range of topics such as academic writing (also in English), research ethics, philosophy of science, conference presentations, popularization of science and teaching skills. In the period under assessment the Faculty has reviewed its policies on PhD admission, supervision as well as the examination of theses. It has also revised its PhD degree requirements in line with the Bologna process, particularly with view to employability both within and beyond academia. The ILLC policy in supervision is to make use of any collaborators that may serve each postgraduate student best. Within the Faculty of Arts some of the most notable partner institutions have been other language units, General Linguistics, Translation Studies, Comparative Literature, Finnish Literature, the

4 INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL (INCL. INTERSECTORAL) RESEARCH COLLABORATION AND RESEARCHER MOBILITY (MAX. 4400 CHARACTERS WITH SPACES)

7



Nordic languages (esp. Swedish literature), and the Renvall (North American) and Alexander (Russian) cultural institutes. Beyond the Faculty, there has been collaboration in supervision with the Social Sciences, especially Social Psychology. By national and international networks, the contacts can be broadened, even if supervising doctoral theses written at other universities in Finland or abroad is challenging owing to the red tape required at the home university.

RC’s strengths and challenges related to research collaboration and researcher mobility, and the actions planned for their development.

The strengths are evident: good existing networks within University of Helsinki, with other institutions and scholars in Finland and abroad vouch for continuous assessment in seminars, conferences and publications. The challenges have to do with (a) lack of funding for postgraduates for spending lengthy periods at foreign universities and (b) supervisors from other universities (in Finland or abroad) not being sufficiently compensated, which in practice makes it impossible to use them extensively (unless by barter agreements, that is, exchanging supervisees).


The material operational conditions for the ILLC PIs are largely in place. They have positions at the university and thus the facilities needed. However, the balance between research on the one hand and teaching, supervision and administration on the other is rather skewed. No sabbatical system is in place, and even positions previously given to Senior Scholars at the Academy of Finland have now been turned into positions for project leaders. Since in the humanities both senior and junior scholars often have – and often are encouraged to have – specific, individual projects, this means that there are no sabbaticals for PIs, unless they happen to lead research projects. In practice, this means that the PIs have rather little time for research – at best between 20-40 per cent of their working time. Thus, the research output of ILLC members should be viewed in this perspective. As far as the more unofficial working conditions are concerned, ILLC has many in place already. Many of us have known each other and collaborated for years, in different combinations, within and beyond the units of the department. Most of us work in the same building, and can knock on each other’s doors, arrange seminars or just have coffee or lunch with short notice. We communicate in whatever language is the most useful lingua franca at various seminars or meetings, usually English or Finnish, although in smaller groups we may speak other languages, such as Swedish, French or Russian. On the other hand, post-doctorate scholars and postgraduate students without funding often lack all facilities and thus have rudimentary operational conditions (that is, in practice work at home). Thus, for two important and reasonable early stages in the academic career there is little or no community provided to the young scholars, who often drop out and seek other career opportunities. ILLC does its best to include all suitable and active researchers in its community and has thus invited some gifted, young, as yet non-funded doctoral students to become members, despite the fact their research output so far is not very impressive.

RC’s strengths and challenges related to operational conditions, and the actions planned for their development.

The strengths were implied above: in operational conditions where PIs have comparatively little time for research, the research output of ILLC speaks for itself. Sabbaticals for (at least) PIs would be required.

5 OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS (MAX. 4400 CHARACTERS WITH SPACES)

8



For now, ILLC seeks in part to make good of the present state of affairs by implementing synergy in teaching and supervision through the current syllabus reform at the Department of Modern Languages. What the ILLC cannot remedy is the Finnish university policy of unplanned postgraduate intake, which entails that not all postgraduate students have funding. In theory, it is all well and good that anybody with a good research plan can do postgraduate study. In practice, however, this leads to a high drop-out rate, frustration among supervisors and supervisees, and ultimately to a waste of resources and time for both. The Swedish system of PhD positions allocated to each department is evidently highly competitive for departments and prospective postgraduate students alike, but it is a system in which departments and students can more efficiently plan and implement their studies.

Description of the execution and processes of leadership in the RC, how the management-related

responsibilities and roles are distributed in the RC and how the leadership- and management-related processes support high quality research, collaboration between principal investigators and other researchers in the RC, the RC’s research focus and strengthening of the RC’s know-how.

Having taken the initiative to ILLC and planned it together with half a dozen of PIs the autumn of 2010, I was asked to be its convenor. We promptly formed a board of directors consisting of leading professors and PIs: Pettersson and Taavitsainen (English), Helkkula and Tuomarla (French) and Hellman and Pesonen (Russian). This group is at present the Board, but for pressing duties such as collecting information, we found that a smaller executive committee is needed, so we formed one with a representative from each of the three main subjects: Pettersson (English, chair), Helkkula (French) and Hellman (Russian), the two latter of whom have also agreed to be vice chairs. We called all ILLC members to a meeting on 14 February, where I presented a draft of this report for all to comment on. The various points were discussed and some suggestions were taken on board for this final version. In this way, all members have been (and indeed will be) able to shape the profile of ILLC, while still having a board and an executive committee in charge. The leadership of ILLC views itself as a group whose task is to enable and synergize the research carried out at the various units. Thus, ILLC combines top bottom-up and top-down decision-making: all members are heard and can choose their research projects freely, while there is a leadership that helps to monitor and implement supervision, teaching and, when need be, research cooperation. It seeks to provide the auspices for interdisciplinary research of different kinds. Evidently, the PIs and other senior researchers will supervise the doctoral students, but whenever possible seminars and meetings are conducted in less hierarchical ways. The research focuses consist of various combinations of the four research areas. Some of the most prevalent combinations are style (linguistics and literature), narrative (literature and culture), language in context (linguistics and culture, including media), and cultural clashes in language and translation (linguistics, literature, culture). But these focuses are in some sense umbrella terms for different kinds of approach, since methodologies are devised depending on the basis of the primary material. That is, ILLC goes beyond the rather unfruitful ways of late-twentieth-century human sciences, in which primary material at times was fitted to suit the theory espoused. When funded, ILLC can strengthen its know-how by inviting guest speakers to the conferences and seminars organized and by allowing its members to apply for funding for important activities, such as conference organization, travel or research assistants.

6 LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT IN THE RESEARCHER COMMUNITY (MAX. 4400 CHARACTERS WITH SPACES)

9



RC’s strengths and challenges related to leadership and management, and the actions planned for developing the processes.

The leadership of ILLC can openly be discussed at board and general meetings in the future. Owing to the enduring relations between most PIs, there is a general feel of interdisciplinary research conducted in a collegial spirit. Most PIs also have extensive administrative experience, which will stand ILLC in good stead as it faces future challenges of organization and implementation. One of these challenges is to help doctoral students form academically fruitful relations between themselves and to PIs outside their primary fields.

Listing of the RCs external competitive funding, where: - the funding decisions have been made during 1.1.2005-31.12.2010, and - the administrator of the funding is/has been the University of Helsinki

Academy of Finland (AF) - total amount of funding (in euros) AF has decided to allocate to the RC

members during 1.1.2005-31.12.2010: 683500 (estimate)

Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation (TEKES) - total amount of funding (in euros) TEKES has decided to allocate to the RC members during 1.1.2005-31.12.2010: -

European Union (EU) - total amount of funding (in euros) EU has decided to allocate to the RC members during 1.1.2005-31.12.2010: -

European Research Council (ERC) - total amount of funding (in euros) ERC has decided to allocate to the RC members during 1.1.2005-31.12.2010: -

International and national foundations – names of international and national foundations which have

decided to allocate funding to the RC members during 1.1.2005-31.12.2010, and the amount of their funding (in euros).

- names of the foundations: Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies - Helsinki University Foundation - U of H, Chancellor’s Travel Grants - U of H, Department of English Travel Grants - U of H, Jubilee Fund - U of H, completion of PhD thesis grants - U of H Funds, The Erkki Hannikainen Scholarship Fund - U of H, Network for European Studies - U of H Research Funds - See also item 2, penultimate paragraph of main text. - total amount of funding (in euros) from the above-mentioned foundations: 346000 (estimate)

Other international funding - names of other international funding organizations which have decided to allocate funding to the RC members during 1.1.2005-31.12.2010, and the amount of their funding (in euros).

- names of the funding organizations: See also item 2, penultimate paragraph of main text.

7 EXTERNAL COMPETITIVE FUNDING OF THE RC

10



- total amount of funding (in euros) from the above-mentioned funding organizations:

Other national funding (incl. EVO funding and Ministry of Education and Culture funded doctoral programme positions) - names of other national funding organizations which have decided to allocate funding to the RC members during 1.1.2005-31.12.2010, and the amount of their funding (in euros).

- names of the funding organizations: The Finnish Graduate School of Literary Studies – The Ministry of Education and Culture

- total amount of funding (in euros) from the above-mentioned funding organizations: 90000 (estimate)

Description of the RC’s future perspectives in respect to research and doctoral training.

As a concerted interdisciplinary effort combing the existing strengths in leading language departments, ILLC is an innovative initiative. Its scientific significance lies in explicit and methodologically aware combinations of four central areas of language study, which are likely to have considerable impact in academia as forerunners of the kinds of interdisciplinarity that other departments in Finland and elsewhere are likely to emulate in the future. In a volatile and changing Finnish and global job market, humanists with at least double specializations and experience of combining different fields will stand a better chance of landing positions. Also, the expertise in both language and culture that ILLC imparts to its participants is bound to have a significant societal impact.

Any strategic action plan is dependent on the funding allocated. If ILLC receives funding, it will deepen its cooperation by

- cooperating in research, supervision and teaching,

- organizing seminars and conferences,

- publishing some research jointly,

- spreading its funding as evenly as possible among its participants, and, as a matter of course,

- producing as much top-class research as possible within its present auspices. The preliminary timetable is as follows:

Joint postgraduate seminars (3-4/term), general meetings (1/term), board/executive committee meetings (2/term) will be held all three years.

Spring 2011 Implementing cooperation on all levels

Autumn 2011 Intensified seminar work

Spring 2012 Internal conference, with working papers

Autumn 2012 International conference, with call for papers

Spring 2013 Collecting selected and revised papers for volume and editing

Autumn 2013 Edition published / Final conference

8 RC’S STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN FOR 2011–2013 (MAX. 4400 CHARACTERS WITH SPACES)

11



These three years, which include three conferences (internal, international and final, the scope of which depends on funding), will provide the senior and junior researchers with an interdisciplinary research environment, which seeks to deepen and broaden their research and thus benefit them as well as the national and international research community and society at large.

See the first three paragraphs under item 6. As convenor, I have kept in touch with all ILLC members by email, informing them about developments and tasks, such as adding information to the TUHAT database. When collecting information on funding and the like, the executive committee divided up all other members into three groups: Pettersson for English (18 members in all), Helkkula for French (7) and Hellman for Russian (7). I collated the information thus gathered and wrote a draft of the application, which I presented it to the executive committee on 7 February 2011. I was given feedback by Helkkula and Hellman, rewrote the draft and presented it to the general meeting on 14 February 2011, after which I was given the authority to formulate the final version of the application.

9 SHORT DESCRIPTION OF HOW THE RC MEMBERS HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE COMPILATION OF THE STAGE 2

MATERIALS (MAX. 1100 CHARACTERS WITH SPACES).

ILLC/Pettersson

1


RC-SPECIFIC TUHAT COMPILATIONS OF PUBLICATIONS DATA 2005-2010

1 Analysis of publications - Associated person is one of Ivan Berazhny , [email protected], Marja-Liisa Helenius , [email protected], Mervi Helkkula , [email protected], Ben Hellman , [email protected], Tuomo Hiippala , [email protected], Léa Huotari , [email protected], Sabine Kraenker , [email protected], Päivi Kuivalainen , [email protected], Jari Martti Johannes Käkelä , [email protected], Maija Liisa Könönen , [email protected], Gennady Obatnin , [email protected], Mari Johanna Pakkala-Weckström , [email protected], Pekka Pesonen , [email protected], Bo Pettersson , [email protected], Anne Riippa , [email protected], Mark Shackleton , [email protected], Howard Sklar , [email protected], Timo Suni , [email protected], Peter Swirski , [email protected], Irma Taavitsainen , [email protected], Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen , [email protected], Cecilia Therman , [email protected], Ulla Tuomarla , [email protected], Eija Maritta Ventola , [email protected], Jenni Vesanen, Elina Vänskä , [email protected], Päivi Väätänen , [email protected], Fredrik Westerlund , [email protected], Tiina Wikström , [email protected]

Publication year

Publication type 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total Count 2005 -

2010

A1 Refereed journal article 3 1 6 8 4 1 23

A3 Contribution to book/other compilations (refereed) 12 19 19 25 22 21 118

A4 Article in conference publication (refereed) 2 2 2 5 11

B1 Unrefereed journal article 2 2 2 3 9

B2 Contribution to book/other compilations (non-refereed) 1 1 1 2 6 11

B3 Unrefereed article in conference proceedings 3 2 5

C1 Published scientific monograph 1 1 3 5

C2 Edited book, compilation, conference proceeding or special issue of journal

5 6 7 10 6 8 42

D2 Article in professional hand or guide book or in a professional data system, or text book material

1 1 2

E1 Popular article, newspaper article 7 6 1 8 1 8 31

E2 Popular monograph 1 1

I2 ICT programs or applications 1 1

ILLC/Pettersson

2



2 Listing of publications

A1 Refereed journal article

2005 Pettersson, B 2005, 'Literature a a textualist notion', From text to literature, pp. 128-145.

Suni, T 2005, 'Isaak Babelin suomalaiskertomus', Idäntutkimus, vol 12, no. 2, pp. 71-75.

Suni, T 2005, 'Suomi Venäjän kirjallisuudessa: Kiparskyn monografian kaksi versiota', Synteesi : taiteidenvälisen tutkimuksen aikakauslehti, vol 24, no. 4, pp. 50-74.

2006 Helkkula, M 2006, 'Énonciation et subjectivité dans La Première Gorgée de bière et autres plaisirs minuscules ', Poétique : revue de théorie et d'analyse littéraires, vol 147, pp. 317- 325.

2007 Könönen, M 2007, 'Mielipuolen muistiinpanot: pietarilainen päiväkirjafiktio Nikolai Gogolista Juri Bujdaan', Tieteessä tapahtuu.

Könönen, M 2007, 'Pietari ja gnostilaisuus Jelena Svartsilla', Idäntutkimus, vol 2007, no. 2, pp. 63-74.

Obatnin, G 2007, 'Varhainen bolsevismi ja alkukristillisyys', Idäntutkimus, vol 2007, no. 1, pp. 32-40.

Obatnin, G 2007, 'Venäläinen runous tänään', Idäntutkimus, vol 2007, no. 2, pp. 3-8.

Obatnin, G 2007, 'Proteus: es e raz o satanistah XX veka', Russkaa literatura, no. 4, pp. 32-46.

Sklar, H 2007, 'Reimagining the Teaching of Secondary English', Pedagogy, vol 7, no. 2, pp. 309-16.

2008 Hellman, B 2008, '" ...":

', Scando-Slavica, vol 55, pp. 24-42.

Käkelä, JMJ 2008, 'Asimov's Foundation Trilogy: From the Fall of Rome to the Rise of Cowboy Heroes', Extrapolation, vol 49, no. 3, pp. 432-449.

Könönen, M 2008, 'Kirja-arvostelut', Scando-Slavica, vol 54, pp. 285-285.

Könönen, M 2008, 'Me, the madman - writing the self in Russian diary fiction', Scando-Slavica, vol 54, pp. 79-101.

Pettersson, B 2008, 'Procrustean beds and strange bedfellows: on literary value as assigned by literary theories', Journal of Literary Theory, vol 2, no. 1, pp. 19-34.

Sklar, H 2008, 'Sympathy as self-discovery: the significance of caring for others in "Betrayals"', Paradoxa, vol 21, pp. 185-205.

Sklar, H 2008, 'Narrative as experience: the pedagogical implications of sympathizing with fictional characters', Partial Answers, vol 6, no. 2, pp. 481-501.

Taavitsainen, I, Pahta, P 2008, 'From global language use to local meanings: English in Finnish public discourse', English today., vol Vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 25-38.

2009 Helkkula, M 2009, 'Narration omnisciente ou récit sans narrateur: sur les romans de Jean Echenoz', Poétique : revue de théorie et d'analyse littéraires, vol 160, pp. 397 - 404.

Sklar, H 2009, 'Believable Fictions: On the Nature of Emotional Responses to Fictional Characters', Helsinki English studies, vol 5.

Sklar, H 2009, 'Narrative Structuring of Sympathetic Response: Theoretical and Empirical Approaches to Toni Cade Bambara’s ‘The Hammer Man’', Poetics Today, vol 30, no. 3, pp. 561-607.

Taavitsainen, I 2009, ''My brother Ihesu Crist that is the principal leche [...] ': religious discourse in Middle English medical writing', Poetica, vol 72, pp. 59-76.

2010 Swirski, P 2010, 'Of Morality, Proverbial Wisdom, and Bernard Malamud’s God’s Grace', Politics and Culture, vol 2010, no. 1.

A3 Contribution to book/other compilations (refereed)

ILLC/Pettersson

3



2005 Obatnin, G 2005, 'Es e raz o pervom sonete iz triptiha Va c . Ivanova "Rozy"', S ipovnik, Vodolej Publishers ,, Moskva, pp. 312-332.

Pettersson, B 2005, 'The many faces of unreliable narration: a cognitive narratological reorientation', in EBHVBPAMP (ed.) , Cognition and literary interpretation in practice, Yliopistopaino, cop., [Helsinki], pp. 59-88.

Pettersson, B 2005, 'Om osanningens konsekvens i konstnärers memoarer', Det öppna rummet, Söderström, Helsingfors, pp. 145-156.

Pettersson, B 2005, 'Afterword: cognitive literary studies : where to go from here', in EBHVBPAMP (ed.), Cognition and literary interpretation in practice, Yliopistopaino, cop., [Helsinki] , pp. 307-322.

Shackleton, M 2005, 'Beyond conflict: memory, trauma, and recovery in Beatrice Mosionier's In search of April raintree, Eden Robinson's Monkey Beach, and the works of Tomson Highway', Memoire de guerre et construction de la paix. mentalites et choix politiques : Belgique, Europe, Canada., PIE-Peter Lang, Bruxelles, pp. 147-155.

Shackleton, M 2005, 'Whose myth is it anyway?: coyote in the poetry of Gary Snyder and Simon J. Ortiz', American mythologies, Liverpool University Press, Liverpool, pp. 226-242.

Sklar, H 2005, 'Believable Fictions: The Moral Implications of Story-Based Emotions', in H Veivo, B Pettersson, M Polvinen (eds) , Cognition and Literary Interpretation in Practice, Yliopistopaino kustannus = Helsinki University Press, Helsinki, Finland, pp. 157-82.

Taavitsainen, I 2005, 'On corpus linguistics: computers and the history of English', Re-interpretations of English (II), Universidade da Coruna, [?], [Coruna], pp. 325-345.

Taavitsainen, I 2005, 'Genres and the approppriation of science: loci communes in English in the late medieval and early modern period', Opening windows on texts and discourses of the past, Pragmatics & Beyond, vol. vol. 134, Benjamin, cop., Amsterdam, pp. 179-196.

Taavitsainen, I 2005, 'Standardisation, house styles, and the scope of variation in ME scientific writing', Rethinking Middle English, pp. 89-109.

Ventola, E 2005, 'Multimodality, multimediality and multiliteracies: a new era for the press and using the press', Pressetextsorten im Vergleich, Georg Olms, Hildesheim, pp. 351-387.

Ventola, E 2005, 'Revisiting service encounter genre: some reflections', Folia linguistica, The Hague, pp. 19-43.

2006 Helkkula, M 2006, 'Un "vague sujet"? Sur le pronom on et sa traduction en finnois', Tra Italia e Francia. Entre France et Italie, Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki, vol. 69, Société Néophilologique, Helsinki, pp. 229-241.

Helkkula, M 2006, 'FID in 'first-person narration.' On Proust's A la recherche du temps perdu', Free language, indirect translation, discourse narratology, Tampere studies in language, translation and culture, Series A, Tampere University Press Taju [jakaja], [Tampere], pp. 11-26.

Hellman, B 2006, ' : ', , Nauc naa biblioteka : nauc noe priloz enie, Novoe lit. obozrenie : Kaf. slavistiki Un-ta, Moskva; Hel'sinki, pp. 446-460.

Kraenker, S 2006, 'La mise en parallèle de deux journaux de voyage de Michel Leiris: L’Afrique fanto me (19 mai 1931 -16 février 1933) et le Journal de Chine (17 septembre 1955 - 3 novembre 1955) ou l’écriture décalée de la rencontre avec l’autre', Actes du Colloque international tenu au Caire par la Faculté des Lettres de l’Université Ain-Chams en collaboration avec le Centre Franc ais de Culture et de Coopération et l’Agence Universitaire de la francophonie, Horizons, vol. 10, Amis du Livre, Le Caire, pp. 221-233.

Könönen, M 2006, '"Fin de siècle" a-la Iosif Brodskij i Italo Kal’vino', Istoria i povestvovanie, Naucnaa biblioteka : naucnoe prilozenie, Novoe lit. obozrenie : Kaf. slavistiki Un-ta, Moskva; Hel'sinki, pp. 521-542.

Obatnin, G, Pesonen, P 2006, 'Tri imeni, ili Spasibo vsem!', Istoria i povestvovanie, Nauc naa biblioteka : nauc noe priloz enie, Novoe lit. obozrenie : Kaf. slavistiki Un-ta, Moskva; Hel'sinki, pp. 5-11.

Obatnin, G 2006, 'K teme "Va c eslav Ivanov i literaturnye vkusy 1890-h godov"', Bas na Va c eslava Ivanova i kul’tura serebra nogo veka, Sankt-Peterburgskij gosudarstvennyj universitet, filologic eskij fakul’tet, Sankt-Peterburg, pp. 133-148.

Obatnin, G 2006, 'Russkij modernizm i anarhizm: iz nablu denij nad temoj', Ètkindovskie c tenia . 2-3. sbornik statej po materialam C tenij pama ti E. G. Ètkinda., Evropejskij universitet v Sankt-Peterburge,, Sankt-Peterburg, pp. 100-137.

Pesonen, P 2006, 'Oma ja vieras venäläisessä kulttuurissa', Opas venäläisyyteen, Otava, Helsingissä, pp. 231-269.

Pettersson, B 2006, 'Kirjallisuuden lajien teoriasta ja käytännöstä', Genre - tekstilaji, Tietolipas, vol. 213, Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura, Helsinki, pp. 151-164.

ILLC/Pettersson

4



Pettersson, B 2006, 'Two faces have I: Bruce Springsteenin sanoituksista ja niiden ristiriidoista', Ääniä äänien takaa, Tampere University Press,, [Tampere], pp. 273-296.

Taavitsainen, I 2006, 'Lingua francas of medical communication', The encyclopedia of language & linguistics, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.

Taavitsainen, I 2006, 'Key word in context: semantic and pragmatic meaning of humour', The power of words, Costerus, vol. 163, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 209-219.

Taavitsainen, I 2006, 'Audience guidance and learned medical writing in late medieval English', in M Gotti, F Salager-Meyer (eds) , Advances in Medical Discourse Analysis. Oral and Written Contexts., Linguistic insights, vol. 45, Peter Lang, New York , pp. 431-456.

Taavitsainen, I 2006, 'Merchant in historical corpora', Variation in business and economics discourse, Varieta di testi, varieta di lingue, vol. 6, Officina,, Rome, pp. 21-44.

Taavitsainen, I 2006, 'Medical discourse: early genres, 14th and 15th centuries', The encyclopedia of language & linguistics, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp. 688-694.

Taavitsainen, I 2006, 'Towards a corpus-based history of specialized languages: Middle English Medical Texts', Corpus-based studies of diachronic English, Linguistic insights, Lang, Bern, pp. 79-93.

Taavitsainen, I 2006, 'Genredynamiikkaa aikaperspektiivissä', Genre - tekstilaji, Tietolipas, vol. 213, Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura, Helsinki, pp. 266-282.

Ventola, E 2006, 'Genre systeemis-funktionaalisessa kielitieteessä: esimerkkinä asiointitilanteet', Genre - tekstilaji, Tietolipas, vol. 213, Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura, Helsinki, pp. 96-121.

2007 Fitzmaurice, S, Taavitsainen, I 2007, 'Introduction', Methods in historical pragmatics, Topics in English linguistics, vol. 52, Mouton de Gruyter, cop., Berlin, pp. 1-10.

Helkkula, M 2007, 'Le réel, la mimésis et les modes d énonciation', Le réel et son envers, Publications du Département des langues romanes, vol. 19, Université de Helsinki, Département des langues romanes, Helsinki, pp. 45-56.

Helkkula, M 2007, 'La fortune de Flaubert en Finlande', Réalisme, naturalisme et réception - problèmes esthétiques et idéologiques envisagés dans une perspective scandinave, franc aise, ou comparative, Studia Romanica Upsaliensia, vol. 72, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Uppsala, pp. 259-269.

Helkkula, M 2007, 'Remarques sur les traductions en finnois du Rouge et le Noir de Stendhal', Les images du réalisme franc ais, Studia Romanica Upsaliensia, vol. 71, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Uppsala, pp. 247-253.

Hellman, B 2007, 'Samuil Marshak: yesterday and today', Russian children's literature and culture, Routledge, New York (NY), pp. 217-239.

Hellman, B 2007, 'Leonid Andreev, Finland, 1906', Varietas et concordia, Slavica Helsingiensia, vol. 31, Department of Slavonic and Baltic Languages and Literatures, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, pp. 32-48.

Könönen, M 2007, '"Notes of a madman" as a St. Petersburg bachelor's discource', Varietas et concordia, Slavica Helsingiensia, vol. 31, Department of Slavonic and Baltic Languages and Literatures, University of Helsinki, Helsinki , pp. 50-63.

Mahrer, R, Tuomarla, U 2007, 'Le portrait, un exemple parlant d’oralité dans la presse écrite', Le francais parle des medias, Romanica Stockholmiensia, vol. 24, Université de Stockholm cop., Stockholm, pp. 491-501.

Obatnin, G 2007, 'Iz nablu denij nad modernistskim istorizmom', Varietas et concordia, Department of Slavonic and Baltic Languages and Literatures, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, pp. 408-426.

Obatnin, G 2007, 'Kupido wor proklaty, ili C elovekom nado byt', Kirillica, ili nebo v almanah. sbornik k 40-letiu Kirilla Rogova., Ruthenia, Tartu.

Pahta, P, Taavitsainen, I, Nevalainen, T, Tyrkkö, J 2007, 'Towards multimedia in corpus studies: introduction', Towards multimedia in corpus studies, Studies in variation, contacts and change in English, The Research Unit for Variation, Contacts and Change in English (VARIENG), Helsinki.

Pesonen, P, Jänis, M 2007, 'Venäläinen kirjallisuus', Suomennoskirjallisuuden historia, Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura, Helsinki, pp. 189-205.

Pesonen, P, Jänis, M 2007, 'Neuvostokirjallisuutta-sarja', Suomennoskirjallisuuden historia, Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura, Helsinki, pp. 466-468.

Shackleton, M 2007, 'Canada', The Routledge companion to postcolonial studies, Routledge companions, Routledge, London , pp. 83-94.

Shackleton, M 2007, 'The ever-travelling trickster: the trickster figure in Native and non-native North American writing', What is Your Place?, Beiträge zur Kanadistik, vol. Bd. 14, Wissner-Verlag, Augsburg, Bay, pp. 74-82.

ILLC/Pettersson

5



Shackleton, M 2007, 'The theme of adoption in Native North American Literature', Communities and connections, Renvall Institute, Helsinki, pp. 137-144.

Shackleton, M 2007, 'June walked over it like water and came home: cross-cultural symbolism in Louise Erdrich's Love medicine and Tracks', Transatlantic voices, University of Nebraska Press cop., Lincoln, pp. 188-205.

Taavitsainen, I, Jucker, AH 2007, 'Speech act verbs and speech acts in the history of English', Methods in historical pragmatics, Topics in English linguistics, vol. 52, Mouton de Gruyter, cop., Berlin, pp. 107-138.

Taavitsainen, I, Fitzmaurice, S 2007, 'Historical pragmatics: what it is and how to do it', Methods in historical pragmatics, Topics in English linguistics, vol. 52, Mouton de Gruyter, cop., Berlin, pp. 11-36.

2008 Antos, G, Ventola, E, Weber, T 2008, 'Introduction: interpersonal communication : linguistic points of view', in EBGAEVICWTW (ed.) , Handbook of interpersonal communication, Handbooks of applied linguistics, vol. 2, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 1-11.

Helkkula, M 2008, 'Jean Echenoz: nykyelämän absurdiuden kuvaaja', in P Kosonen, H Meretoja, P Mäkirinta (eds), Tarinoiden paluu. esseitä ranskalaisesta nykykirjallisuudesta ., Café Voltaire, no. [1], Avain, pp. 269-276.

Hellman, B 2008, 'A visitor and a letter: Ivan Turgenev's Finnish contacts', S lubov'u k slovy, Helsingin yliopisto, Slavistiikan ja baltologian laitos, Helsinki, pp. 59-66.

Jucker, AH, Taavitsainen, I 2008, 'Apologies in the history of English: routinized and lexicalized expressions of responsibility and regret', Speech acts in the history of English, Pragmatics & Beyond, vol. 176, Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 205-220.

Jucker, AH, Schneider, G, Taavitsainen, I, Breustedt, B 2008, 'Fishing for compliments: Precision and recall in corpus-linguistic compliment research', Speech acts in the history of English, Pragmatics & Beyond, vol. 176, Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 249-270.

Kraenker, S 2008, 'Camille Laurens, omaelämäkerran ja fiktion rajalla', Tarinoiden Paluu, esseitä ranskalasesta nykykirjallisuudesta, Avain, Helsinki, pp. 187-194.

Kraenker, S, Tuomarla, U 2008, 'Camille Laurens: omaelämäkerran ja fiktion rajalla', in P Kosonen, H Meretoja, P Mäkirinta (eds), Tarinoiden paluu. esseitä ranskalaisesta nykykirjallisuudesta ., Café Voltaire, no. [1], Avain, [Helsinki] , pp. 187-194.

Nevalainen, T, Taavitsainen, I, Pahta, P 2008, 'Exploring the dynamics of linguistic variation through public and private corpora', in T Nevalainen, I Taavitsainen, P Pahta, M Korhonen (eds), The dynamics of linguistic variation. Corpus evidence on English past and present., Studies in language variation, vol. 2, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 1-9.

Obatnin, G 2008, '"Poèzia grammatika"', S lu bov’u k slovy, Helsingin yliopisto, Slavistiikan ja baltologian laitos, pp. 277-299.

Obatnin, G 2008, '"Vyc ury"', I vrema i mesto. istoriko-filologic eckij sbornik k s estidesa tiletiu Aleksandra L'vovic a Ospovata., Novoe izdatel'stvo, Moskva, pp. 432-443.

Obatnin, G 2008, 'Legendarnyh kalendar’ "Poèmy bez geroa "', Natales grate numeras?. Sbornik statej k 60-letiu Georgia Ahillovic a Levintona., Izdatel’stvo Evropejskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburg, Sankt-Peterburg, pp. 426-446.

Pakkala-Weckström, M 2008, 'No botmeles bihestes: Various ways of making binding promises in Middle English', Speech acts in the history of English, Pragmatics & Beyond, vol. 176, Benjamins, Amsterdam.

Pasanen, P, Pakkala-Weckström, MJ 2008, 'The Finnish way to travel: verbs of motion in Finnish frog story narratives', in M Garant, I Helin, H Yli-Jokipii (eds), Kieli ja globalisaatio = Language and globalization , Suomen soveltavan kielitieteen yhdistyksen (AFinLA) julkaisuja, no. 66, Suomen soveltavan kielitieteen yhdistys AFinLA, Jyväskylä , pp. 311-331.

Pesonen, P 2008, 'Does Imatra represent all of Finland?: On the Imatra text of Russian modernism', A sounding of signs, Acta Semiotica Fennica, vol. 30, International Semiotics Institute, Helsinki, pp. 190-203.

Pesonen, P 2008, 'Sovetskaa literatura v Finnla ndii', S lu bov’u k slovy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, pp. 300-310.

Pettersson, B 2008, 'I narrate, therefore I am?: on narrative, moral identity and modernity', Narrative and identity, Giessen contributions to the study of culture, vol. 1, Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier,, Trier, pp. 23-36.

Pettersson, B 2008, 'Tilltal i Bo Carpelans lyrik', Medvandrare, Åbo Akademis förlag, Åbo, pp. 211-230.

Shackleton, M 2008, 'Resisting terminal creeds: the trickster and keeping the field of Diaspora Studies open', Diasporic literature and theory, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne, pp. 180-195.

Taavitsainen, I, Jucker, AH 2008, 'Methinks you seem more beautiful than ever: compliments and gender in the history of English', Speech acts in the history of English, Pragmatics & Beyond, vol. 176, Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 171-204.

Taavitsainen, I, Jucker, AH 2008, 'Speech acts now and then: towards a pragmatic history of English', Speech acts in the history of English, Pragmatics & Beyond, vol. 176, Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. ix-xxxi.

Therman, C 2008, 'Empiirisen kirjallisuudentutkimuksen näkökulmia tekijyyden tutkimukseen', Tekijyyden ulottuvuuksia, Nykykulttuurin tutkimuskeskuksen julkaisuja, vol. 93, Jyväskylän yliopisto, [Jyväskylä], pp. 57-73.

ILLC/Pettersson

6



Therman, C 2008, 'Remindings, understanding and involvement: a close reading of the content and context of remindings', New beginnings in literary studies, Cambridge Scholars Pub, Newcastle, pp. 352-371.

Ventola, E 2008, 'Lexical density and grammatical intricacy in conferencing', in RG&BK( (ed.) , Institutional discourse in cross-cultural contexts, (LINCOM studies in pragmatics, vol. Vol. 14), LINCOM Europa,, Munchen, pp. 271-286.

Ventola, E, Jones, C 2008, 'Introduction', From language to multimodality. edited by Carys Jones and Eija Ventola., Equinox Pub, London.

Ventola, E 2008, 'Multisemiotics of conferencing: challenges to researching and training presentation skills', in EBCWCMMMH (ed.) , Proceedings of ISFC 35, The 35th ISFC Organizing Committee ,, Sydney, pp. 316-321.

2009 Florby, G, Shackleton, M, Suhonen, K 2009, 'Introduction: Canada : images of a post/national society', in NS=C:IDSP/GFMS&KS( (ed.), Canada. Images of a post., Canadian studies, vol. no. 19, P.I.E.-Peter Lang,, Brussels, pp. 11-22.

Helkkula, M 2009, 'Sur les constructions disloquées à gauche dans À la recherche du temps perdu de Marcel Proust', Du côté des langues romanes. editeurs: Eva Havu, Mervi Helkkula et Ulla Tuomarla ; secretaire de la redaction: Marja Ursin., Mémoires de la Société néophilologique de Helsinki, Société Néophilologique, Helsinki, pp. 201 - 213.

Hellman, B 2009, 'Under the yoke of bolshevism: a Russian anti-soviet film, produced in Finland', Literatura kak miroponimanie = Literature as a world view. Festschrift in honour of Magnus Ljunggren., (Gothenburg slavic studies, vol. 2), University of Gothenburg,, Göteborg, pp. 99-115.

Hellman, B 2009, 'He had a special liking for our country: Vasilii Vereshchagin and Finland', in EBEK (ed.) , The unlimited gaze, (Aleksanteri Series, vol. 2/2002), [Aleksanteri Institute], [Helsinki], pp. 323-349.

Keinänen, N, Pakkala-Weckström, M 2009, 'Discourses of jealousy and marital violence in Shakespeare', in EBNKAMS (ed.), Authority of expression in early modern England, Cambridge Scholars,, Newcastle upon Tyne, pp. 77-97.

Kraenker, S, Veivo, HMS 2009, 'L'autobiographie comme avant-garde', in T Arppe, T Kaitaro, K Mikkonen (eds), Writing in context = L’écriture en contexte. French Literature, theory and the Avant-Gardes = Littérature, théorie et avant-gardes françaises au XXe siècle., vol. 5, COLLeGIUM : studies across disciplines in the humanities and social sciences, vol. 5, Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies, Helsinki, pp. 122-138.

Kraenker, S 2009, 'Des écrivains à l'identité hybride, représentants d'une littérature-monde d'aujourd'hui et de demain : Karin Bernfeld, Assia Djebar, Amin Maalouf, Wajdi Mouawad', Problématiques culturelles dans l'enseignement-apprentissage des langues-cultures, mondialisation et individualisation : approche interdisciplinaire, Synergies Pays Riverains de la Baltique, vol. 6, Gerflint, Tallinn, pp. 219-227.

Kraenker, S 2009, 'Le corps dans les amours virtuelles', Actes de la rencontre internationale "Corps et écriture". Sabine Kraenker (éd.), en collaboration avec Xavier Martin., Publications du Département des langues romanes de l'Université de Helsinki, [Universite de Helsinki],, [Helsinki], pp. 59 - 64.

Kuivalainen, P 2009, 'Emotions in Narrative: A Linguistic Study of Katherine ', in H Sklar (ed.), Helsinki English Studies. Emotions: Implications for Literary, Linguistic and Translation Studies., vol. 5 , Helsinki English Studies, vol. 5.

Könönen, M 2009, 'Joseph Brodsky's poem Kellomiaki: a lived landscape and symbolic world of signs', in EBNBAMR (ed.), The dacha kingdom. summer dwellers and dwellings in the Baltic area., (Aleksanteri Series, vol. 3/2009), [Aleksanteri Institute], Helsinki , pp. 171-192.

Obatnin, G 2009, 'K voprosu o tak nazyvaemoj ženskoj poezii', in EBEK (ed.), The unlimited gaze, Alaeksanteri Series, vol. 2/2002), [Aleksanteri Institute], [Helsinki], pp. 179-201.

Pettersson, B 2009, 'Three fallacies in interpreting literature', in EBJF.[A (ed.), Humane readings. essays on literary mediation and communication in honour of Roger D. Sell., Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 145-156.

Pettersson, B 2009, 'Narratology and hermeneutics: forging the missing link', in EBSHRS (ed.), Narratology in the age of cross-disciplinary narrative research, Narratologia : contributions to narrative theory, de Gruyter, cop., Berlin, pp. 11-34.

Shackleton, M 2009, 'Curious case of Coyote: or the tale of the appropriated Trickster', in EBJRWAKEK;FBMH (ed.) , Reconfigurations of Native North America. an anthology of new perspectives., Texas Tech University Press, cop., Lubbock, Tex, pp. 75-90.

Shackleton, M 2009, 'Tomson Highway's Ernestine Shuswap gets her trout: imagining the post-national society', in NS=C:IDSP/GFMS&KS( (ed.), Canada. Images of a post., Canadian studies, vol. no. 19, P.I.E.-Peter Lang,, Brussels, pp. 299-307.

Sklar, H 2009, 'Breaking Bread: The Sympathetic Effects of Sharing Food in The Grapes of Wrath', in MJ Meyer (ed.), The Grapes of Wrath. A Re-Consideration., Rodopi, pp. 557-84.

Taavitsainen, I 2009, 'Astrological medicine', in R Bjork (ed.), Oxford Dictionary of the Middle Ages, Oxford University Press.

Taavitsainen, I 2009, 'Authority and instruction in two sixteenth-century medical dialogues', in EBMPJSST (ed.), Instructional writing in English. studies in honour of Risto Hiltunen., Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 105-124.

ILLC/Pettersson

7



Taavitsainen, I 2009, 'Early English Scientific Writing: New Corpora, New Approaches', in JE Díaz Vera. / Caballero, R Caballero (eds) , Textual Healing: Studies in Medieval English Medical, Scientific and Technical Texts , Linguistic Insights , vol. 101, Peter Lang .

Taavitsainen, I 2009, 'Joyful news out of the newfound world: medical and scientific news reports in Early Modern England', in EBAHJ (ed.), Early modern English news discourse. newspapers, pamphlets and scientific news discourse., Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 189-204.

Tuomarla, U 2009, 'La parenthèse complice', La langue en contexte. Eva Havu, Juhani Härmä, Mervi Helkkula, Meri Larjavaara et Ulla Tuomarla (eds.) ; secretaire de la redaction: Marja Ursin., Mémoires de la Société néophilologique de Helsinki, Société Néophilologique, Helsinki, pp. 337 - 348.

Tuomarla, U 2009, 'Scénographie énonciative et parenthèses. L’exemple de L’Homme-sœur de Patrick Lapeyre (2004)', Romanica Wratislaviensia LVI. Les mots pelerins., Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wroc awskiego, pp. 187-197.

2010 Helasvuo, M, Johansson, M, Tanskanen, S 2010, 'Discourse and the interactional turn', Discourses in Interaction, Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, vol. 203, John Benjamins, Amsterdam & Philadelphia.

Hellman, B 2010, ' . 1899 .', . ., vol. LXXXVII, , Moscov, pp. 224-236.

Hellman, B 2010, '"Tiedän onneton synnyinmaanne...": Suomalaisten käynnit Leo Tolstoin luona', Maaemon lapset. Tolstoilaisuus kulttuurihistoriallisena ilmiönä Suomessa., Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura, pp. 77-94.

Huttunen, T, Pesonen, P 2010, 'The Swamp of Texts: Literary Mythology of St. Petersburg Revisited', in T Huttunen, M Ylikangas (eds) , Witnessing Change in Contemporary Russia, Kikimora Publications Series B, no. 38, vol. 2010, Kikimora Publications, pp. 159-183.

Kraenker, S 2010, 'Les avant-propos de Philippe Lejeune ou les introductions intimes d'une oeuvre de critique littéraire', Neohelicon Acta comparationis litterarum universarum, vol. 37, Springer, Budapest, pp. 305-316.

Könönen, ML 2010, ' . ', . ., Nauchnoe prilozhenie. Vyp. LXXXVII, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, pp. 142-161.

Obatnine, GV 2010, 'Blok v "Broda c ej sobake"', in [NM (ed.), Perma kovskij sbornik. 2, Novoe izdatel'stvo, Moskva, pp. 499-502.

Pahta, P, Taavitsainen, I 2010, 'Scientific writing', Historical pragmatics, Handbook of Pragmatics, vol. VIII, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin and New York.

Pesonen, P 2010, 'Kulttuurit rinnakkain ja vastakkain?: Unelmat ja uhkakuvat', in V Hattara, HW (eds), Suuriuhtinaskunnasta Itämeren kaasuputkeen. Mikä on muututnut Suomen ja Venäjän suhteissa?., Helsingin yliopiston vapaan sivistystyön toimikunta, Helsinki, pp. 87-114.

Pesonen, P 2010, 'Issledovanie i prepodavanie russkoi literatury v Hel'siskom universitete: Nekotorye obshie i chastnye voprosy', Izuchenie i prepodavanie russkogo jazyka v Finljandii. Sbornik statej., Zlatoust, St. Peterburg, pp. 32-48.

Pettersson, B 2010, 'On the Interrelation of Genre and Mimesis, Especially in Science Fiction and Realist Fiction', in P Lyytikäinen, T Klapuri, M Maijala (eds), Genre and Interpretation, Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugrian and Scandinavian Studies and The Finnish Graduate School of Literary Studies, Helsinki, pp. 90-108.

Swirski, P 2010, 'Hemingway, Ernest', The Thirties in America..

Swirski, P 2010, 'Walden Two: B.F. Skinner', Masterplots: Third Revised Edition.

Swirski, P 2010, 'Godfather Trilogy', Encyclopedia of American Immigration.

Swirski, P 2010, '“American Literature, Film, and Drama.”', in R Chapman (ed.), Encyclopedia of the Culture Wars: Issues, Voices, and Viewpoints, M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, N.Y..

Taavitsainen, I, Jucker, AH 2010, 'Current trends in historical pragmatics', Historical pragmatics, vol. VIII, Handbook of Pragmatics, vol. VIII, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin and New York.

Taavitsainen, I, Jucker, AH 2010, 'Expressive speech acts and politeness in eighteenth-century English', Eighteenth Century English. Ideology and change., Studies in English Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 159-181.

Taavitsainen, I, Suhr, C 2010, 'Appendix: Medicine in Society', in I Taavitsainen, P Pahta (eds), Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus Description and Studies, John Benjamins, pp. 133-146.

Taavitsainen, I 2010, 'Discourse and genre dynamics in Early Modern English medical writing', in I Taavitsainen, P Pahta (eds), Early Modern English Medical texts: Corpus Description and Studies, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam and Philadelphia.

Tyrkkö, J, Taavitsainen, I 2010, 'Category 1. General treatises and textbooks', in I Taavitsainen, P Pahta (eds), Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus Description and Studies, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

ILLC/Pettersson

8



Tyrkkö, J, Taavitsainen, I 2010, 'The field of medical writing with fuzzy edges', in I Taavitsainen, P Pahta (eds) , Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus Description and Studies, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 57-62.

A4 Article in conference publication (refereed)

2006 Mahrer, R, Tuomarla, U 2006, 'Voici une solution à vos problèmes de couple. Oralité et déicticité', in De l’énoncé à l’énonciation et vice-versa. Regards multidisciplinaires sur la deixis, pp. 127-140 Studia romanica tartuensia IVa.

Tuomarla, U 2006, 'Écriture académique et identité culturelle', in Dans la jungle du discours rapporté: genres de discours et discours rapporté.

2008 Kraenker, S 2008, Voix de femmes dans la rupture amoureuse à travers l'exemple de Marcelle Sauvageot dans "Laissez-moi" et celui de Sophie Calle dans "Douleur exquise",, Paper presented at The women's language, Komotini, Greece. 26. May, 2006 - 28. May, 2008..

Tuomarla, U, Kraenker, S 2008, 'Ecriture académique et identité culturelle : comparaison entre un corpus français et un corpus finlandais', in Assessing Language and (Inter-)cultural Competences in Higher Education/Evaluation des compétences langagières et (inter-)culturelles dans l'enseignement supérieur .

2009 Taavitsainen, I 2009, 'The pragmatics of knowledge and meaning: corpus linguistic approaches to changing thought-styles in early modern medical discourse', in Corpora: Pragmatics and discourse : papers from the 29th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 29), Ascona, Switzerland, 14-18 May 2008 / edited by Andreas H. Jucker, Daniel Schreier and Marianne Hundt, pp. 37-62.

Tuomarla, U, Mahrer, R 2009, 'De l'effet énonciatif des 'et' à l'inintiale de phrase et de la ponctuation: L'exemple de la réécriture du Village dans la motagne de C. F. Ramuz', in Le sens en marge: Représentations linguistiques et observables discursifs, pp. 151-168.

2010 Helkkula, M 2010, 'Continuité énonciative et débuts de texte', in Actes du XXVe Congrès International de Linguistique et de Philologie Romanes, pp. 457-466.

Keinänen, N, Pakkala-Weckström, MJ 2010, 'Linguistic Survival Strategies in Geoffrey Chaucer's Clerk's Tale, William Shakespeare's Othello and Elizabeth Cary's The Tragedy of Mariam', in Interactional Perspectives on Discourse: Proceedings from the Organization in Discourse 3 Conference, Anglicana Turkuensia, vol. 25.

Könönen, ML 2010, 'Nikolai Gogol's "Diary of a Madman" and European Diary Fiction', in Europe - Evropa: Crosscultural Dialogues between the West, Russia, and Southeastern Europe, pp. 115-131 Studia multiethnica Upsaliensia.

Tuomarla, U, Kraenker, S 2010, 'Quelques remarques sur l'écriture passionnée ; la lettre d'amour et de rupture dans Les liaisons dangereuses de Laclos', in ACTES DU XVIIe CONGRÈS DES ROMANISTES SCANDINAVES / ACTAS DEL XVII CONGRESO DE ROMANISTAS ESCANDINAVOS , pp. 556-568 Tampere Studies in Language, Translation and Culture, Series , vol. B 5.

Tuomarla, U 2010, 'La parenthèse comme point de rencontre', in Communications du Ci-dit colloque international.

B1 Unrefereed journal article

2005 Shackleton, M 2005, 'An interview with Tomson Highway', First and other nations, pp. 92-100.

Shackleton, M 2005, 'Introduction', First and other nations, pp. iii-v.

2006 Pakkala-Weckström, M 2006, 'Discourses on Love, Marriage and Transgression in Medieval and Early Modern Literature: kirja-arvostelu', Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, vol 107, no. 4, pp. 506.

Pesonen, P 2006, 'Sostakovits: Neuvostoliiton koko kuva', Idäntutkimus, vol 13, no. 3, pp. 40-41.

2007 Kraenker, S 2007, 'Ecritures de femmes pour dire son corps et sa sexualité: discours novateur ou stéréotypé ?', Latin-American journal of fundamental psychopathology on line, vol ano 7, no. 2, nov. 2007, pp. 148-160.

ILLC/Pettersson

9



Pettersson, B 2007, 'The real in the unreal: mimesis and postmodern American fiction', European English messenger., vol 16, no. 1, pp. 33-39.

2009 Pakkala-Weckström, M 2009, 'Acquiring new perspectives on text and discourse', Linguistik und Übersetzung in Kouvola : Irmeli Helin (Hrsg.), pp. 44 - 56.

Pakkala-Weckström, M 2009, 'Does anyone have a question?', Helsinki English studies.

Pettersson, B 2009, 'Besprechungen', Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, vol 110, no. 4, pp. 537-538.

B2 Contribution to book/other compilations (non-refereed)

2005 Pahta, PI, Mäkinen, MS, Taavitsainen, I 2005, 'Editorial policy in text presentation and mark-up', in I Taavitsainen, P Pahta, M Mäkinen, R Hickey (eds), Middle English Medical Texts. CD-ROM., John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

2006 Pesonen, P 2006, 'Utopioista normeiksi: venäläisen kulttuurin kehityslinjoja klassismista postmodernismiin ja sen jälkihoitoon', in J Nikula (ed.), Katse Venäjään. suomalaisen Venäjä-tutkimuksen antologia., Aleksanteri-sarja, no. 2006:3, Aleksanteri-instituutti, Helsinki, pp. 11-30.

2008 Pakkala-Weckström, M 2008, 'Kuunari Helenan kanssa uusille vesille: erään projektityön toteutus', in I Helin, H Yli-Jokipii (eds) , Kohteena käännös. uusia näkökulmia kääntämisen ja tulkkauksen tutkimiseen ja opiskelemiseen ., Käännöstieteen laitoksen julkaisuja / Helsingin yliopisto, no. 4, Helsingin yliopisto, käännöstieteen laitos, Helsinki, pp. 87-109.

2009 Obatnin, G 2009, '1. ', Memento vivere:

. . . . . . . , Nauka, .- , pp. 245 – 260.

Pesonen, P 2009, 'Reality as story and story as reality: some problems of fact and fiction in the 20th century Russian prose', Unlimited Gaze. Essays in Honour of Professor Natalia Baschmakoff., Aleksanteri Series, no. 2, Aleksanteri institute, [Helsinki] , pp. 171-177.

2010 Kraenker, S 2010, 'Deux témoins de l'histoire du Liban : Richard Millet et Wajdi Mouawad: Autobiographie et Histoire, D'Ibn Khaldoun à nos jours', Actes du colloque tenu à Carthage les 23-24-25 novembre 2006, Tunis, pp. 237-251.

Obatnin, G 2010, ' ', Con amore: . , , , pp. 425 - 435.

Obatnin, G 2010, ' ', : . . . . , . . . , Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, , pp. 237 – 274 .

Obatnin, G 2010, ' ', : . . . . , . . , .- , pp. 684 – 721.

Obatnin, G 2010, ' . ', : . 60-. ., Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, , pp. 309 – 328.

Obatnin, G 2010, ' « »', : 60- , Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, , pp. 243 – 259.

B3 Unrefereed article in conference proceedings

2009 Helkkula, M 2009, 'Mémoire du corps et écriture Proustienne', in Actes de la rencontre internationale "Corps et écriture", pp. 75 - 80 Publications du Département des langues romanes de l’Université de Helsinki, no. 22.

Hiippala, T 2009, 'Modelling multimodal genre in print media: A case study of tourist brochures', in Proceedings of the 10th World Congress of Semiotics.

Pakkala-Weckström, MJ 2009, Learning the Ropes: How First-Year Translation Students Develop their Translator Identity,.

ILLC/Pettersson

10



2010 Huotari, L 2010, 'A la recherche du sujet perdu : de l’importance de l’analyse contrastive dans la recherche des universaux de traduction', in Actes de la journée des jeunes chercheurs 4.12. 2009, pp. 1-14.

Westerlund, F 2010, 'La relation entre cours d'eau et musique dans l'écriture de J.-M.G. Le Clézio', in Actes du XVIIe Congrès des romanistes scandinaves, pp. 1257-1266 Tampere Studies in Language, Translation and Culture, no. B 5.

C1 Published scientific monograph

2008 Therman, C 2008, Readers' responses versus reader-response theories: an empirical study, VDM Verlag Dr. Muller, Saarbrucken.

2009 Hellman, B 2009, . Meetings and Clashes.: . rticles on Russian literature, Slavica Helsingiensia, no. 36, Helsingin yliopisto, Slavistiikan ja baltologian laitos, Helsinki.

2010 Hellman, B, Rogachevskii, A 2010, Filming the Unfilmable: Casper Wrede’s ’One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich , ibidem-Verlag, Stuttgart, Stuttgart.

Swirski, P 2010, Ars Americana, Ars Politica: Partisan Expression in Contemporary American Literature and Culture, McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal.

Swirski, P 2010, Literature, Analytically Speaking: Explorations in the Theory of Interpretation, Analytic Aesthetics, and Evolution (Cognitive Approaches to Literature and Culture Series)., University of Texas Press, Austin.

C2 Edited book, compilation, conference proceeding or special issue of journal

2005 Haddington, P, Tuomarla, U, Rostila, J (eds) 2005, SKY Journal of Linguistics 18, SKY Journal of Linguistics, vol. 18, Suomen kielitieteellinen yhdistys.

Pettersson, B, Polvinen, M, Veivo, H (eds) 2005, Cognition and Literary Interpretation in Practice, Yliopistopaino = Helsinki University Press, [Helsinki].

Shackleton, M, Supinen, V (eds) 2005, First and other nations, Renvall-instituutin julkaisu, no. 20, University of Helsinki, [Helsinki].

Taavitsainen, I, Jucker, A (eds) 2005, Journal of Historical Pragmatics, vol. 6, John Benjamins.

Taavitsainen, I, Pahta, P, Mäkinen, M (eds) 2005, Middle English medical texts, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

2006 Dossena, M, Taavitsainen, I (eds) 2006, Diachronic perspectives on domain-specific English, Linguistic insights, no. 40, Lang, Bern.

Garavelli, E, Helkkula, M, Välikangas, O, Ursin, M (eds) 2006, Tra Italia e Francia. Entre France et Italie: in honorem Elina Suomela-Härmä, Memoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki, no. 69, Société Néophilologique, Helsinki.

Jucker, AH, Taavitsainen, I (eds) 2006, Journal of historical pragmatics, vol. Vol. 7, no. 1, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

Jucker, AH, Taavitsainen, I (eds) 2006, Journal of historical pragmatics, vol. Vol. 7, no. 2, Historical courtroom discourse, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

Obatnin, G, Pesonen, P (eds) 2006, Istoria i povestvovanie: [sbornik statej] ; pod redakciej G. V. Obatnina, P. Pesonena, Naucnaa biblioteka : naucnoe prilozenie, no. Vyp. 56, Novoe lit. obozrenie : Kaf. slavistiki Un-ta, Moskva; Hel'sinki.

Taavitsainen, I, Härmä, J, Korhonen, J, Ursin, M (eds) 2006, Dialogic language use: Dimensions du dialogisme = Dialogischer Sprachgebrauch, Memoires de la Societe Neophilologique de Helsinki, no. 66, Société Néophilologique, Helsinki.

2007 Fitzmaurice, SM, Taavitsainen, I (eds) 2007, Methods in historical pragmatics, Topics in English linguistics, no. 52, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

Helkkula, M, Tuomarla, U (eds) 2007, Le réel et son envers, Publications du Département des langues romanes, no. 19, Université de Helsinki, Département des langues romanes, Helsinki.

Hellman, B, Huttunen, T, Obatnin, G (eds) 2007, Varietas et concordia: essays in honour of professor Pekka Pesonen on the occassion of his 60th birthday, Slavica Helsingiensia, no. 31, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.

ILLC/Pettersson

11



Härmä, J, Havu, E, Helkkula, M, Larjavaara, M, Lehtinen, M, Tuomarla, U (eds) 2007, Actes du XXIXème colloque international de linguistique fonctionnelle, Helsinki 2005, Publications du Département des langues romanes / Université de Helsinki, no. 18, Département des langues romanes de l'Université de Helsinki, Helsinki.

Nevalainen, T, Tanskanen, S (eds) 2007, Letter writing, Benjamins Current Topics, vol. 1, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam.

Pahta, P, Taavitsainen, I, Nevalainen, T, Tyrkkö, J (eds) 2007, Towards multimedia in corpus studies, Studies in variation, contacts and change in English, no. Vol. 2, The Research Unit for Variation, Contacts and Change in English (VARIENG), Helsinki .


2008 Antos, G, Ventola, E, Weber, T (eds) 2008, Handbook of interpersonal communication, Handbooks of applied linguistics, no. 2, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

Hellman, B (ed.) 2008, Puskinista Peleviniin: venäläisen kaunokirjallisuuden suomennosten bibliografia 1876-2007, Slavistiikan ja baltologian laitos, Helsingin yliopisto, Helsinki.

Jones, C, Ventola, E (eds) 2008, From language to multimodality: new developments in the study of ideational meaning, Equinox Pub, London.

Jucker, AH, Taavitsainen, I (eds) 2008, Speech acts in the history of English, Pragmatics & BeyondNew Series, no. 176, Benjamins, Amsterdam.

Lindstedt, J, Chesterman, A, Kopotev, M, Laamanen, A, Nikunlassi, AO, Nuorluoto, J, Papinniemi, J, Pesonen, P, Viimaranta, J (eds) 2008, : Festschrift in Honour of Professor Arto Mustajoki, Slavica Helsingiensia, no. 35, Helsingin yliopisto, Slavistiikan ja baltologian laitos.

Neumann, B, Nunning, A, Pettersson, B, Polvinen, M (eds) 2008, Narrative and Identity: Theoretical Approaches and Critical Analyses, Giessen contributions to the study of culture, no. 1, Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier, Trier.

Nevalainen, T, Taavitsainen, I, Pahta, P, Korhonen, MK (eds) 2008, The dynamics of linguistic variation: Corpus evidence on English past and present, Studies in language variation, no. 2, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

Rinne, H, Lindstedt, J, Pesonen, P (eds) 2008, Doklady finskoj delegacii na XIV mez dunarodnom s"ezde slavistov = Finnish contributions to the 14th International Congress of Slavists: Ohrid, September 10-16, 2008, Studia Slavica Finlandensia, no. 25, Institute for Russia and Eastern Europe, Helsinki.

Shackleton, M (ed.) 2008, Diasporic literature and theory: where now?, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne.


2009 Florby, G (ed.), Shackleton, M (ed.), Suhonen, K (ed.), Nordic Association for Canadian Studies 2009, Canada: Images of a post/national society = Canada : images d'une societe post/nationale / Gunilla Florby, Mark Shackleton, & Katri Suhonen (eds.), Canadian studies, no. no. 19, P.I.E.-Peter Lang, Brussels.

Havu, E, Härmä, J, Helkkula, M (ed.), Larjavaara, M (ed.), Tuomarla, U (ed.), Ursin, M (ed.) 2009, La langue en contexte: actes du colloque "Représentations du sens linguistique IV", Helsinki 28-30 mai 2008, Mémoires de la Société néophilologique de Helsinki, no. 78, Société Néophilologique, Helsinki.

Havu, E, Helkkula, M, Tuomarla, U (eds) 2009, Du co té des langues romanes: mélanges en l'honneur de Juhani Härmä, Mémoires de la Société néophilologique de Helsinki, no. tome 77, Société néophilologique, Helsinki.

Jucker, AH, Taavitsainen, I (eds) 2009, Journal of historical pragmatics, vol. Vol. 10, no. 1, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

Jucker, AH, Taavitsainen, I (eds) 2009, Journal of historical pragmatics, vol. Vol. 10, no. 2, Historical sociopragmatics, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

Kraenker, S, Martin, X (eds) 2009, Actes de la rencontre internationale "Corps et écriture" Helsinki 2008, vol. 22, Publications du Département des Langues Romanes, Université de Helsinki, Helsinki.

2010 Huttunen, T, Pesonen, P, Obatnin, G (eds) 2010, , , no. LXXXVII, Novoe lit. obozrenie : Kaf. slavistiki Un-ta.

Jucker, AH, Taavitsainen, I (eds) 2010, Historical Pragmatics, Handbook of Pragmatics, vol. VIII, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin and New York.

Könönen, ML, Nuorluoto, J, Salo, M (eds) 2010, Balkanin syndrooma?: Esseitä Kaakkois-Euroopan menneisyydestä, nykyisyydestä ja tulevaisuudesta, Aleksanteri Series, no. 1, vol. 2010, vol. Aleksanteri Series 1/2010, Aleksanteri-instituutti.

ILLC/Pettersson

12



Könönen, ML, Nuorluoto, J (eds) 2010, Europe - Evropa: Crosscultural Dialogues between the West, Russia, and Southeastern Europe, Studia multiethnica Upsaliensia, no. 18, vol. 2010, vol. 2010, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.

Raitaniemi, M, Tanskanen, S, Helasvuo, M, Johansson, M (eds) 2010, Interactional Perspectives on Discourse. Proceedings from the Organization in Discourse 3 Conference, Anglicana Turkuensia, vol. 30, vol. 30, University of Turku, Turku.


Taavitsainen, I, Pahta, P (eds) 2010, Early Modern English Medical Writing: Corpus Description and Studies., John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam and Philadelphia.

Tanskanen, S, Helasvuo, M, Johansson, M, Raitaniemi, M (eds) 2010, Discourses in Interaction, Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, vol. 203, John Benjamins.

D2 Article in professional hand or guide book or in a professional data system, or text book material

2007 Tuomarla, U, Havu, E, Härmä, J, Sihvonen, P, Talvio, L 2007, 'Ohjeita esitelmän tai tutkielman kirjoittajille', Ohjeita esitelmän ja tutkielman kirjoittajille, Helsingin yliopisto, romaanisten kielten laitos, ranskalainen filologia.

2010 Tuomarla, U 2010, 'Oswald Ducrot, Ranskan Monsieur Argumentation', in P Haddington, J Sivonen (eds), Kielentutkimuksen modernit klassikot. Kognitiivinen ja funktionaalinen kielitiede., Gaudeamus, pp. 183-199.

E1 Popular article, newspaper article

2005 Babel, I, Suni, T 2005, 'Suomalaiset', Parnasso, vol 55, no. 3, pp. 26-27.

Obatnin, G 2005, 'Ivanovskaa "bas na " v dome Aleksandra Bloka', Novyj mir iskusstva, vol 2005, no. 2(43), pp. 96-97.

Pesonen, P 2005, 'Ei pätkätöitä pukinkonttiin: Tolstoin Sodan ja rauhan varhainen versio on keskeneräinen torso', Helsingin Sanomat.

Pettersson, B 2005, 'Tänka och tolka: om kognitiv litteraturforskning', Ikaros, vol 4, pp. 6.

Pettersson, B 2005, 'Theory's empire: an anthology of dissent', Hufvudstadsbladet.

Shackleton, M 2005, 'Verse or worse?', Finn-Brits, vol Autumn, pp. 21-24.

Wikström, T 2005, 'Korppi: Kuinka korppi löytää ensimmäiset ihmiset', Kajo' : lehti Amerikan alkuperäiskansoista, vol 9/2005, no. 1455-531X, pp. 20-25.

2006 Helkkula, M 2006, 'Peili kohti lukijaa', Synteesi : taiteidenvälisen tutkimuksen aikakauslehti, vol 25, no. 2, pp. 14-18.

Käkelä, JMJ 2006, 'Asimovin Säätiö-trilogia ja amerikkalainen ekspansionismi', Portti : Tampereen science fiction seuran lehti, no. 3.

Pesonen, P 2006, 'Antiikin myytti sai nettiversion: [kirja-arvostelu]', Helsingin Sanomat.

Shackleton, M 2006, 'An A-Z of new and newish words', Yours truly, vol 13, pp. 21.

Wikström, T 2006, 'Kohtaamisia puolen hehtaarin metsässä: "Nalle Puhin juhlapäivä" -näyttely Päivälehden museossa 1.3.2006-31.8.2006', Museo : Suomen museoliiton julkaisu, vol 2006:3, no. 0781-0032, pp. 26-28.

Wikström, T 2006, 'Punahattu-intiaanien yleisrohto', Kajo' : lehti Amerikan alkuperäiskansoista, vol 10/2006, no. 1455-531X, pp. 12-13.

2007 Pettersson, B 2007, 'De trampade upp stigen: Fredrika Runeberg och Solveig von Schoultz', Källan : Svenska litteratursällskapet informerar, vol 2007, no. 1, pp. 1-2.

2008 Helkkula, M 2008, 'Ranskan kielen maisterit työllistyvät hyvin', Helsingin Sanomat.

Helkkula, M 2008, 'Nuorten kielitaito on kaventumassa', Helsingin Sanomat.

Pesonen, P 2008, 'Rikoksia on paljon, rangaistuksia vähemmän', Helsingin Sanomat, pp. C2.

ILLC/Pettersson

13



Pesonen, P 2008, 'Venäjän menneisyys on myös sen tulevaisuus: Sorokin vetäisee housut alas Putinin kontrolloidulta demokratialta', Helsingin Sanomat, pp. C1.

Pesonen, P 2008, 'Nikolai Gogol - itsensä rääkkäyttävän sanan taituri', Kuolleet sielut, pp. 5-30.

Pesonen, P 2008, 'Houre ja tosi kohtaavat Pietarissa: Dostojevskin romaanien uusien suomennosten sarja alkaa lupaavasti : "Pyhä isä sentään, mitä tässä puhumaan, joskus vain kieputtaa!"', Helsingin Sanomat, pp. C2.

Pettersson, B 2008, 'Preface', Narrative and identity.

Väätänen, P 2008, 'Afroamerikkalainen tieteiskirjallisuus', Portti : Tampereen science fiction seuran lehti, vol 2008, no. 1, pp. 23-33.

2009 Pesonen, P 2009, 'Pyhimys vai vanha pukki?: viihdyttävä romaani kuvastaa Leo Tolstoin viimeistä vuotta läheisten silmin', Helsingin Sanomat, pp. C1.

2010 Huotari, L, Lautenbacher, OP 2010, 'Kansainvälinen mutta silti kotimainen?: VIII Kääntämisen ja tulkkauksen tutkimuksen symposiumi, Helsingin yliopisto 23.-24.4.2010', Kääntäjä - Översättaren, vol 2010, no. 7, pp. 1-3.

Huotari, L, Kemppanen, H, Lehtinen, M 2010, 'Konferenssikuulumisia Gentistä: Tiukkaan rajattu aihepiiri', Kääntäjä - Översättaren, vol 2010, no. 5, pp. 13-14.

Pesonen, P 2010, 'Venäjää koko elämä', Uralin pihlaja, vol 2010, no. 3, pp. 6-9.

Pesonen, P 2010, 'Idiootti - tässä ja nyt! Miksi?: Arv. Fjodor Dostojevski. Idiootti. Suom. Olli Kuukasjärvi. Otava', Helsingin Sanomat, vol 2010, pp. C2.

Pesonen, P 2010, 'Toveri Majakovski nykyaikaa etsimässä: Neuvostolehtiin kirjoitetut matkajutut todistavat ensin sankariksi ja sitten slkykupiksi muumioidun runoilijan näkijänkykyjä', Helsingin Sanomat, vol 2010, pp. C1.

Pettersson, B 2010, 'Millä kielellä ratkommekaan maailman ongelmia?', Helsingin Sanomat.

Swirski, P 2010, '"Power to the People... at the Top"', Helsinki University Bulletin, no. 6/2010.

Tuomarla, U, Helkkula, M 2010, 'Mihin katosi suomalaisten monipuolinen kielitaito?', Helsingin Sanomat, pp. C6.

E2 Popular monograph

2007 Sen, A 2007, Moniääninen Intia: kirjoituksia historiasta, kulttuurista ja identiteetistä, translated by Tiina Wikström, Basam books, Helsinki.

I2 ICT programs or applications

2010 Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus, CD-ROM

ILLC/Pettersson

1


RC-SPECIFIC TUHAT COMPILATIONS OF OTHER SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES 2005-2010

1 Analysis of activities 2005-2010 - Associated person is one of Ivan Berazhny , [email protected], Marja-Liisa Helenius , [email protected], Mervi Helkkula , [email protected], Ben Hellman , [email protected], Tuomo Hiippala , [email protected], Léa Huotari , [email protected], Sabine Kraenker , [email protected], Päivi Kuivalainen , [email protected], Jari Martti Johannes Käkelä , [email protected], Maija Liisa Könönen , [email protected], Gennady Obatnin , [email protected], Mari Johanna Pakkala-Weckström , [email protected], Pekka Pesonen , [email protected], Bo Pettersson , [email protected], Anne Riippa , [email protected], Mark Shackleton , [email protected], Howard Sklar , [email protected], Timo Suni , [email protected], Peter Swirski , [email protected], Irma Taavitsainen , [email protected], Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen , [email protected], Cecilia Therman , [email protected], Ulla Tuomarla , [email protected], Eija Maritta Ventola , [email protected], Jenni Vesanen, Elina Vänskä , [email protected], Päivi Väätänen , [email protected], Fredrik Westerlund , [email protected], Tiina Wikström , [email protected]

Activity type Count

Supervisor or co-supervisor of doctoral thesis 37

Prizes and awards 7

Editor of research journal 73

Editor of research anthology/collection/conference proceedings 14

Peer review of manuscripts 21

Editor of series 13

Editor of special theme number 1

Assessment of candidates for academic posts 11

Membership or other role in review committee 7

Membership or other role in research network 1

Membership or other role in national/international committee, council, board 92

Membership or other role in public Finnish or international organization 21

Membership or other role of body in private company/organisation 24

Participation in interview for written media 92

Participation in radio programme 11

Participation in TV programme 1

ILLC/Pettersson

2



2 Listing of activities 2005-2010

Supervisor or co-supervisor of doctoral thesis Mervi Helkkula , [email protected] Thesis supervision, Mervi Helkkula, 2005 …, Finland

Thesis supervision, Mervi Helkkula, 2009 2010, Finland

Thesis supervision, Mervi Helkkula, 2009 …, Finland

Thesis supervision, Mervi Helkkula, 2010 …, Finland

Ben Hellman , [email protected] Supervision of doctoral thesis, Ben Hellman, 01.01.2006 26.11.2006, Denmark

Mari Johanna Pakkala-Weckström , [email protected] Väitöskirjan ohjaus, Mari Johanna Pakkala-Weckström, 01.09.2009 …

Bo Pettersson , [email protected] Through a Glass, Darkly: The Limitations of Language and the Meaning of Silence in Patrick White’s The Tree of Man, Voss and Riders in the Chariot (2005), Bo Pettersson, 2005, Finland

Reading the Texture of Reality: Chaos Theory, Literature and the Humanist Perspective (2008), Bo Pettersson, 2008, Finland

Rhetoric and Representation: Exploring the Cultural Meaning of the Natural Sciences in Contemporary Popular Science Writing and Literature (2008), Bo Pettersson, 2008, Finland

The Art of Sympathy: Forms of Moral and Emotional Persuasion in Fiction (2008), Bo Pettersson, 2008, Finland

Empirical Research on the Attitudes of Standard vs. Non-Standard Forms of English, Bo Pettersson, 2010 …, Finland

Ideological dimensions in the American, British and German translations of Astrid Lindgren’s Madicken and Emil i Lönneberga, Bo Pettersson, 2010 …, Finland

Literary Interpretation: Theory Evaluated against Empirical Findings, Bo Pettersson, 2010 …, Finland

Mediating Cultures through Storytelling in the Novels of Three Native American Authors, Bo Pettersson, 2010 …, Finland

Narrative Dynamics and Ethical Judgments in African American Science Fiction, Bo Pettersson, 2010 …, Finland

Nothing Ever But Lifeless Words? Ethical Considerations in Contemporary Scottish Literature, Bo Pettersson, 2010 …, Finland

Problems Related to the Translation of Fictional Cultures and Cultural Contexts, Bo Pettersson, 2010 …, Finland

Pulp Heroes of Manifest Destiny: Narrative, Genre and Context in Isaac Asimov’s Foundation Trilogy, Bo Pettersson, 2010 …, Finland

Representing Postcolonial Social Change and Migration as Gendered Experiences in the Works of Anita Desai, Bharati Mukherjee and Chitra Divakaruni, Bo Pettersson, 2010 …, Finland

Toward Figural Fantasy: The Representation of Consciousness in Modern Anglo-American Fantasy Literature, Bo Pettersson, 2010 …, Finland

Mark Shackleton , [email protected] Primary PhD supervisor, Mark Shackleton, 2010, Finland

Primary PhD supervisor, Mark Shackleton, 2010, Finland




Secondary PhD supervisor, Mark Shackleton, 2010, Finland

Timo Suni , [email protected] Väitöskirjan ohjaus, Timo Suni, 09.2005 …

Väitöskirjan ohjaus, Timo Suni, 09.2009 …

ILLC/Pettersson

3



Irma Taavitsainen , [email protected] PhD thesis supervision, Irma Taavitsainen, 01.01.2005 …, Finland

PhD thesis supervision, Irma Taavitsainen, 01.01.2005 …, Finland



PhD thesis supervision, Irma Taavitsainen, 01.01.2007 …

PhD thesis supervision, Irma Taavitsainen, 01.01.2007 …



PhD thesis supervisor, Irma Taavitsainen, 01.01.2010 19.11.2010

Prizes and awards Tuomo Hiippala , [email protected] Yearly award for the best Master's thesis, Tuomo Hiippala, 2007, Finland

Bo Pettersson , [email protected] The Oskar Öflund Foundation Prize 2006 (Oskar Öflunds stora pris), Bo Pettersson, 2006, Finland

Membership in The Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters, Bo Pettersson, 2010 …, Finland

Peter Swirski , [email protected] Nominated for the National Book Award, Modern Language Association (MLA) James Russell Lowell Award, John Hope Franklin’s Publication Prize, James Russell Lowell Prize, Albert J. Beveridge Award, John H. Dunning Prize, National Book Critics Circle Book Award, BAAS (British Association for American Studies) Book Prize, Goldsmith Awards (John Shoernstein Centre), and American Studies Network Book Prize., Peter Swirski, 2010

Irma Taavitsainen , [email protected] Member of the Finnish Academy of Sciences and Letters, Irma Taavitsainen, 2003 …, Finland

Fellowship at the Huntington, San Marino, California, Irma Taavitsainen, 01.2008 03.2008

Cecilia Therman , [email protected] Prize for best student paper presented at International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature conference in Munich in 2006, Cecilia Therman, 06.08.2006, Germany

Editor of research journal Mervi Helkkula , [email protected] Discours(e), Mervi Helkkula, 01.01.2008 31.12.2008, France

Pekka Pesonen , [email protected] Acta Semiotica Fennica, Pekka Pesonen, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Finland

Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, Pekka Pesonen, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Russia

Slavica Helsingiensia, Pekka Pesonen, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Finland

Tampere Studies in Literature and Textuality, Pekka Pesonen, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Finland

Acta Semiotica Fennica, Pekka Pesonen, 01.01.2006 31.12.2006, Finland




Universitas Tartuensis. Humaniora: Litterae Russicae (myös arvioija), Pekka Pesonen, 01.01.2006 31.12.2006, Estonia



ILLC/Pettersson

4





Universitas Tartuensis. Humaniora: Littrae Rssicae, Pekka Pesonen, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, Estonia





Universitas Tartuensis. Humaniora: Liatterae Rossicae, Pekka Pesonen, 01.01.2008 31.12.2008, Estonia

Bo Pettersson , [email protected] Finsk tidskrift, Bo Pettersson, 2000 2008, Finland

Nordic Journal of English Studies, Bo Pettersson, 2002 …

Journal of Literary Semantics, Bo Pettersson, 2004 …

Cognition and Literary Interpetation in Practice. Toim. Harri Veivo, Bo Pettersson ja Merja Polvinen; Helsinki: Helsinki University Press, 2005. 339 s. ISBN 951-570-598-3, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Finland

Finsk Tidskrift, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Finland

Journal of Literary Semantics, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, United Kingdom

Nordic Journal of English Studies, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Norway

Svenska litteratursällskapet i Finland, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Finland

Tampere Studies in Literature and Textuality, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Finland



Nordic Journal of English Studies, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2006 31.12.2006





Nordic Journal of English Studies, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, Norway




Journal of Literary Semantics, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2008 …, United Kingdom

Narrative and Identity. Theoretical Approaches and Critical Analyses, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2008 31.12.2008, Germany

Nordic Journal of English Studies, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2008 …, Sweden

Tampere Studies in Literature and Textuality, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2008 …, Finland

Mark Shackleton , [email protected] "The Travelling Concept of Narrative" issue of Collegium (Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies electronic journal), Mark Shackleton, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Finland

Diaspora Literature and Theory Where Now (forthcoming), Mark Shackleton, 01.01.2006 31.12.2006, United Kingdom

Images of a Post/National Society (forthcoming), Mark Shackleton, 01.01.2006 31.12.2006, Netherlands

Diasporic Literature and Theory Where Now?, Mark Shackleton, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, United Kingdom

Images of a Post/National Society (forthcoming), Mark Shackleton, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, Netherlands

Canada: Images of a Post/National Society, Mark Shackleton, 01.01.2008 31.12.2008, Netherlands

ILLC/Pettersson

5



Diasporic Literature and Theory - Where Now?, Mark Shackleton, 01.01.2008 31.12.2008, United Kingdom

Timo Suni , [email protected] Kielen matkassa multimediaan. Toim. Hilkka Yli-Jokipii, Timo Suni, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Finland

Irma Taavitsainen , [email protected] Journal of Historical Pragmatics, Irma Taavitsainen, 01.01.2000 …, Netherlands

Corpora: Member of the editorial board, Irma Taavitsainen, 01.01.2007 …, United Kingdom

European Journal of English Studies (EJES): Member of editorial board, Irma Taavitsainen, 01.01.2007 31.12.2010

Textus, Italian Journal of English Studies: Member of the editorial board, Irma Taavitsainen, 01.01.2008 …, Italy

Ulla Tuomarla , [email protected] SKY - Journal of Linguistics, Ulla Tuomarla, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Finland

Le réel et son envers, Ulla Tuomarla, 01.01.2006 31.12.2006, Finland

Le réel et son envers, Ulla Tuomarla, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, Finland

Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, Ulla Tuomarla, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, Finland

Sky Journal of Linguistics, Ulla Tuomarla, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, Finland

SKY Journal of Linguistics, Ulla Tuomarla, 01.01.2008 31.12.2008, Finland

Eija Maritta Ventola , [email protected] ESPECIALIST, Eija Maritta Ventola, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Brazil

Text, Eija Maritta Ventola, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Germany

Visual Communication, Eija Maritta Ventola, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, United Kingdom

Especialist, Eija Maritta Ventola, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, Brazil

Text and Talk, Eija Maritta Ventola, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, Germany


Discourse & Society, Eija Maritta Ventola, 01.01.2008 31.12.2008, United Kingdom

Especialist, Eija Maritta Ventola, 01.01.2008 31.12.2008, Brazil

Interpersonal Communication, Vol. 2 of Handbooks of Applied Linguistics, Eija Maritta Ventola, 01.01.2008 31.12.2008, Germany



Editor of research anthology/collection/conference proceedings Mervi Helkkula , [email protected] Tra Italia e Francia - Entre France et Italie. In honorem Elina Suomela-Härmä, Mervi Helkkula, 01.01.2006 18.12.2006, Finland

Du côté des langues romanes. Mélanges en l'honneur de Juhani Härmä, Mervi Helkkula, 2009

Irma Taavitsainen , [email protected] Early Modern English Medical Texts 1500-1700. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CD-ROM., Irma Taavitsainen, 2000 2010

Middle English Medical Text 1375-1500s. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CD-ROM., Irma Taavitsainen, 2000 2005

Medical and Scientific Writing in English 1375-1500, Irma Taavitsainen, 2004 …, United Kingdom

Diachronic Perspectives on Domain-specific English, Irma Taavitsainen, 2005 2006, Switzerland

Dialogic Language Use: Address in Focus, Irma Taavitsainen, 2005 2006

Methods in Historical Pragmatics, Irma Taavitsainen, 2005 2007, Germany

Speech Acts in the History of English, Irma Taavitsainen, 2005 2008, Netherlands

The Dynamics of Language Variation. Corpus evidence on English past and present, Irma Taavitsainen, 2007 2008, Netherlands

ILLC/Pettersson

6



Towards Multimedia in Corpus Studies. Edited by Päivi Pahta, Irma Taavitsainen, Terttu Nevalainen and Jukka Tyrkkö. Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English Volume 2., Irma Taavitsainen, 01.01.2007, Finland

Historical Pragmatics, Irma Taavitsainen, 2008 2010, Germany

Medical Writing in Early Modern English, Irma Taavitsainen, 2008 2011, United Kingdom

Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus Description and Studies, Irma Taavitsainen, 2009 2010

Peer review of manuscripts Mervi Helkkula , [email protected] Avain, Mervi Helkkula, 03.2007 …, Finland

Discours. Revue de linguistique, psycholinguistique et informatique, Mervi Helkkula, 2007, France

Writing in Context: French Literature, Theory and the Avant Gardes, Mervi Helkkula, 02.2007 …

Journal of Pragmatics, Mervi Helkkula, 2008

Prédicats, prédications et structures prédicatives, Mervi Helkkula, 05.2008 …, France

Mari Johanna Pakkala-Weckström , [email protected] Current Trends in Translation Teaching and Learning (Käännöstieteen laitoksen julkaisuja II), Mari Johanna Pakkala-Weckström, 01.01.2006 31.12.2006, Finland

Irma Taavitsainen , [email protected] Journal of Historical Pragmatics, Irma Taavitsainen, 01.01.2000 …

Middle English Texts, Irma Taavitsainen, 01.01.2005, Belgium

Neuphilologishe Mitteilungen: Peer review of manuscripts, Irma Taavitsainen, 2005 …, Finland

Journal of Pragmatics: Peer review of manuscripts, Irma Taavitsainen, 2007 …

Finnish Literary Society: Statement on a manuscript, Irma Taavitsainen, 01.01.2008, Finland

Routledge kustantamolle lausunto, Irma Taavitsainen, 01.01.2008 31.12.2008, United Kingdom

Cambridge University Press reviews of book manuscripts, Irma Taavitsainen, 2010 …, United Kingdom

English Text Construction, Irma Taavitsainen, 20.12.2010, Netherlands

Reviews scholarly book chapters for Mouton de Gruyter, Irma Taavitsainen, 2010 …, Germany

Textus (English Studies in Italy): Peer review of manuscripts, Irma Taavitsainen, 2010 …, Italy

Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen , [email protected] Peer review of article in: Journal of Pragmatics, Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen, 2010

Peer review of chapter in: Constructing Identity in Interpersonal Communication / Construction identitaire dans la communication interpersonnelle / Identitätskonstruktion in der interpersonalen Kommunikation, Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen, 2010, Finland

Peer review of chapter in: Historical Linguistics of English: An International Handbook, Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen, 2010

Ulla Tuomarla , [email protected] SKY Journal of Linguistics, Ulla Tuomarla, 2007 …

Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, Ulla Tuomarla, 03.2010

Editor of series Pekka Pesonen , [email protected] Acta Semiotica Fennica, Pekka Pesonen, 2010 …, Finland

Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, Pekka Pesonen, 2010 …, Russia

Slavica helsingiensia, Pekka Pesonen, 2010 …, Finland

Tampere Studies in Literature and Textuality, Pekka Pesonen, 2010 …, Finland

Universitas Tartuensis. Humaniora: Litterae Rossicae, Pekka Pesonen, 2010 …, Estonia

ILLC/Pettersson

7



Bo Pettersson , [email protected] Skrifter utgivna av Svenska litteratursällskapet i Finland, Bo Pettersson, 2000 …

Tampere Studies in Literature and Textuality, Bo Pettersson, 2001 …

Skrifter utgivna av Svenska litteratursällskapet i Finland, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2008 …, Finland

Irma Taavitsainen , [email protected] Contributor: ABES Annotated Bibliography for English Studies (database), Irma Taavitsainen, 01.01.2002 31.12.2008, United Kingdom

Palgrave Studies in Language History and Language: Member of the editorial board, Irma Taavitsainen, 01.01.2002 31.12.2010, United Kingdom

Textes Vernaculaires de Moyen Age: Member of the editorial board, Irma Taavitsainen, 01.01.2002 …, Belgium

Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English (refereed open-access series), Research Unit for Variation, Contacts and Change in English, University of Helsinki (http://www.helsinki.fi/varieng) (elektroninen lehti), Irma Taavitsainen, 01.01.2007 …, Finland

Warsaw Studies in English Language and Literature: Member of the editorial board, Irma Taavitsainen, 2010 …, Poland

Editor of special theme number Howard Sklar , [email protected] Helsinki English Studies, Howard Sklar, 05.2008 12.2009, Finland

Assessment of candidates for academic posts Mervi Helkkula , [email protected] ruotsin kääntämisen professorin tehtävän täyttö. HY, Mervi Helkkula, 2009 2010

Suomen kielen professorin tehtävän täyttö HY, Mervi Helkkula, 2010 …

yleisen historian professorin tehtävän täyttö (sijaisuus 1.1.2011-31.12.2013) HY, Mervi Helkkula, 2010 …

Mark Shackleton , [email protected] Docentship application, Mark Shackleton, 2010, Finland

Peter Swirski , [email protected] Promotion Assessor, Peter Swirski, 2010

Irma Taavitsainen , [email protected] Assessment of candidates for a professorial post, Irma Taavitsainen, 2008, Switzerland

Assessment of candidates for a professorial post, Irma Taavitsainen, 2009, Switzerland

Evaluation (a personal chair), Irma Taavitsainen, 2010, United Kingdom

Evaluation for Literacy Studies associate professor's position, Irma Taavitsainen, 07.05.2010, Norway

Member of a professorial search committee, Irma Taavitsainen, 2010, Finland

Member of a professorial search committee, Irma Taavitsainen, 2010, Finland

Membership or other role in review committee Mervi Helkkula , [email protected] Colloquium PAYSAGES EN DIALOGUE : ESPACES ET TEMPORALITES ENTRE CENTRES ET PERIPHERIES EUROPEENNES, Mervi Helkkula, 2010 …, France

Pekka Pesonen , [email protected] Kansainvälisen arviointiryhmän jäsen, Pekka Pesonen, 2010 …, Belgium

Bo Pettersson , [email protected] Suomen Akatemia, Kulttuurin ja yhteiskunnan tutkimuksen toimikunta, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, Finland

Suomen Akatemia, Kulttuurin ja yhteiskunnan tutkimuksen toimikunta, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2008 31.12.2008, Finland

ILLC/Pettersson

8



Reviewer of research proposals, Bo Pettersson, 2010, Slovenia

Irma Taavitsainen , [email protected] External examiner of Master's theses/Stavanger, Norway, Irma Taavitsainen, 2008, Norway

External examiner of Master's thesis/University of Oslo, Irma Taavitsainen, 27.06.2010, Norway

Membership or other role in research network Jari Martti Johannes Käkelä , [email protected] Affiliated Member of The Finnish Doctoral Programme for Literary Studies, Jari Martti Johannes Käkelä, 2010 …, Finland

Membership or other role in national/international committee, council, board Mervi Helkkula , [email protected] Helsingin yliopiston tieteellinen neuvosto, Mervi Helkkula, 01.01.2007 31.12.2009, Finland

Linguistic and psycholinguistic approaches to text structuring, Mervi Helkkula, 21.09.2009 23.09.2009, France

2e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française 2010, Mervi Helkkula, 2010, France

evaluation of a post doc -project proposal, Mervi Helkkula, 05.2010 …, Estonia

Ben Hellman , [email protected] Nordiska slavistförbundet, Ben Hellman, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Denmark

Nordiska slavistförbundet, Ben Hellman, 01.01.2006 31.12.2006

Suomen Slavistipiiri ry, Ben Hellman, 01.01.2006 31.12.2006

Nordiska slavistförbundet, Ben Hellman, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007

Suomen slavistiiri, Ben Hellman, 01.01.2008 31.12.2008, Finland

Sabine Kraenker , [email protected] CRLV, Sabine Kraenker, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, France

Maija Liisa Könönen , [email protected] Suomen Slavistipiiri ry, Maija Liisa Könönen, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Finland

Suomen Slavistipiiri ry (varapuheenjohtaja), Maija Liisa Könönen, 01.01.2006 31.12.2006, Finland

Suomen slavistipiiri, Maija Liisa Könönen, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, Finland

Slavistipiiri ry, Maija Liisa Könönen, 01.01.2008 31.12.2008, Finland

Pekka Pesonen , [email protected] International Semiotic Institute, Pekka Pesonen, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Finland

Semiotiikan verkkoyliopisto, Pekka Pesonen, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Finland

Valtakunnallinen kirjallisuudentutkimuksen tohtorikoulu, Pekka Pesonen, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Finland

International Semiotic Institute, Pekka Pesonen, 01.01.2006 31.12.2006, Finland


Valtakunnallinen kirjallisuudentutkimuksen tohtorikoulu, Pekka Pesonen, 01.01.2006 31.12.2006, Finland

Interational Semiotic Institute, Pekka Pesonen, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, Finland


Valtakunnallinen kirjallisuuden tutkimuksen tohtorikoulu, Pekka Pesonen, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, Finland



Valtakunnallinen Kirjallisuudentutkimuksen Tohtorikoulu, Pekka Pesonen, 01.01.2008 31.12.2008, Finland

Aleksanteri-instituutti, Pekka Pesonen, 2010 …, Finland

ILLC/Pettersson

9



International Semiortic Institute, Pekka Pesonen, 2010 …, Finland

Renvall-insituutti HY, Pekka Pesonen, 2010 …, Finland

Bo Pettersson , [email protected] Runebergsällskapet i Åbo rf., Bo Pettersson, 2000 …, Finland

Svenska litteratursällskapet i Finland, Bo Pettersson, 2000 …

Svenska litteratursällskapets i Finland Hallbergska nämnd, Bo Pettersson, 2000 …

Svenska litteratursällskapets i Finland förlagsnämnd, Bo Pettersson, 2000 …

Svenska litteratursällskapets i Finland litteraturvetenskapliga nämnd, Bo Pettersson, 2000 …

Svenska litteratursällskapets i Finland årsfestkommitté, Bo Pettersson, 2000 …

International Association of University Professors of English, Bo Pettersson, 2001 …

Kirjallisuudentutkimuksen valtakunnallinen tutkijakoulu, Bo Pettersson, 2001 …

Kirjallisuudentutkimuksen valtakunnallinen tutkijakoulu, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Finland

Runebergsällskapet i Åbo, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Finland

SLS Litteraturvetenskapliga nämd, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Finland

SLS Publikationsutskott, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Finland

Svenska Litteratursällskapet i Finland, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Finland

The Committee on Literary Theory of the International Comparative Literature Association (ICLA), Bo Pettersson, 2005 …

The Committee on Literary Theory of the International Comparative Literature Association (ICLA), Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005

International Association of Literary Semantics, Bo Pettersson, 2006 …

International Association of Literary Semantics, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007


SLS Hallbergska prisnämnden, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, Finland

SLS Litteraturvetenskapliga nämd, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, Finland

SLS Publikationsutskott, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, Finland

SLS Årsfestkommittén, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, Finland

Svenska Litteratursällskapet i Finland, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, Finland

The Committee on Literary Theory of the International Comparative Literature Association (ICLA), Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007

Finland - U.S. Educational Exchange Committee (The Fulbright Commission), Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2008 31.12.2008

Finland – U.S. Educational Exchange Committee (The Fulbright Commission), Bo Pettersson, 2008 …

Finland – U.S. Educational Exchange Committee, Helsinki, 2008, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2008 31.12.2008

International Association of Literary Semantics, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2008 …


SLS Forskningens expertgrupp, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2008 31.12.2008, Finland

SLS Hallbergska prisnämnden, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2008 …, Finland

SLS Litteraturvetenskapliga nämnd, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2008 …, Finland

SLS Publikationsutskott / Förlagsnämnd, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2008 …, Finland

SLS Årsfestkommittén, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2008 …, Finland

Svenska Litteratursällskapet i Finland, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2008 …, Finland

Svenska litteratursällskapets i Finland expertgrupp för forskning, Bo Pettersson, 2008 2009

The Committee on Literary Theory of the International Comparative Literature Association (ICLA), Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2008 …

ILLC/Pettersson

10



Mark Shackleton , [email protected] Chair, Mark Shackleton, 1988 2010, Finland

Vice-Chair, Mark Shackleton, 1988 2010, Finland

The Nordic Association for Canadian Studies, Mark Shackleton, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Finland

The Nordic Association for Canadian Studies (Finland), Mark Shackleton, 01.01.2006 31.12.2006

The Nordic Association for Canadian Studies, Mark Shackleton, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, Finland

The Nordic Association for Canadian Studies, Mark Shackleton, 01.01.2008 31.12.2008

Timo Suni , [email protected] Kulttuurin ja yhteiskunnan toimikunta, Timo Suni, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Finland

Peter Swirski , [email protected] Executive Board Member, Peter Swirski, 2010

Honorary Professor,, Peter Swirski, 2010

Member of Executive Council, Peter Swirski, 2010

Irma Taavitsainen , [email protected] ESSE board (European Society of Studies in English), Irma Taavitsainen, 2005 2009

Finnish Association of English Studies FINSSE: Board member, Irma Taavitsainen, 2005 2006, Finland

Finnish Society for the Study of English (FINSSE), Irma Taavitsainen, 01.01.2006 31.12.2006, Finland

Finnish Society for the Study of English (FINSSE): Chair, Irma Taavitsainen, 2006 2007

FINSSE (the Finnish Association of English Studies): Member of the board, Irma Taavitsainen, 2008 2009, United States

FINSSE (the Finnish Association of English Studies): Vice chair, Irma Taavitsainen, 01.01.2008 31.12.2008, Finland

Member of the board and vice-chair of FINSSE (Finnish Society for the Study of English), Irma Taavitsainen, 01.01.2010 31.12.2010

Member of the executive committee of IAUPE (International Association of University Professors of English), Irma Taavitsainen, 2010 …, Switzerland

Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen , [email protected] Vice board member, Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen, 2010, Finland

Ulla Tuomarla , [email protected] Norges forskningsråd, Ulla Tuomarla, 01.01.2006 31.12.2006, Norway

Hallituksen jäsen, Ulla Tuomarla, 2007 …

Eija Maritta Ventola , [email protected] CRAPEL, Université Nancy, Eija Maritta Ventola, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, France

European Systemic Functional Linguistics Association, Eija Maritta Ventola, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007

GAL, Eija Maritta Ventola, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007

European Systemic Functional Linguistics Association, member and chair, 2006-, Eija Maritta Ventola, 01.01.2008 31.12.2008

German Applied Linguistics (GAL), AILA conference organization committee, Eija Maritta Ventola, 01.01.2008 31.12.2008

Membership or other role in public Finnish or international organization Ben Hellman , [email protected] Lausunto Fulbright-apurahahakemuksista, Ben Hellman, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, Finland

Päivi Kuivalainen , [email protected] Kirjoituskilpailun arvosteluraadin jäsen Finnish-British Societyn valtakunnallisessa kirjoituskilpailussa lukion ensimmäisen vuoden opiskelijoille., Päivi Kuivalainen, 01.12.2007 08.12.2007, Finland

Kirjoituskilpailun esiraadin jäsen Suomi-Amerikka -yhdistysten liiton valtakunnallisessa kirjoituskilpailussa lukion toisen ja kolmannen vuoden opiskelijoille., Päivi Kuivalainen, 01.12.2007 08.12.2007, Finland

ILLC/Pettersson

11



Jari Martti Johannes Käkelä , [email protected] Member of the Science Fiction Research Association, Jari Martti Johannes Käkelä, 2007 …, United States

Member of the International Association of the Fantastic in the Arts, Jari Martti Johannes Käkelä, 2008 …, United States

Pekka Pesonen , [email protected] Helsingin yliopisto, Aleksanteri-instituutti, Pekka Pesonen, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Finland

Helsingin yliopisto, Renvall-instituutti, Pekka Pesonen, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Finland

Eino Leinon Seura. Vuoden 2006 Eino Leino -palkinnon palkintolautakunta, Pekka Pesonen, 01.01.2006 31.12.2006, Finland

Helsingin yliopisto, Aleksanteri-instituutti, Pekka Pesonen, 01.01.2006 31.12.2006, Finland







Mark Shackleton , [email protected] Board member, Mark Shackleton, 1988 2010, Finland

Timo Suni , [email protected] Kouvolan seudun maahanmuutto-ohjelman ohjausryhmä, HY:n käännöstieteen laitoksen edustaja, Timo Suni, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Finland

Irma Taavitsainen , [email protected] Board member and programme co-leader of the Finnish graduate school Langnet, Irma Taavitsainen, 01.01.2010 10.09.2010, Finland

Vice-director and member of the board of Varieng (Variation, contacts and change in English) Research Unit, Irma Taavitsainen, 01.01.2010 31.12.2010, Finland

Ulla Tuomarla , [email protected] Helsingin yliopiston humanistisen ja yhteiskuntatieteellisten rahastojen hoitokunnan jäsen, Ulla Tuomarla, 11.2010 12.2014

Helsingin yliopiston kielikeskuksen hallituksen varajäsen, Ulla Tuomarla, 2010 2014

Membership or other role of body in private company/organisation Ben Hellman , [email protected] Suomen slavistipiiri, Ben Hellman, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, Finland

Sabine Kraenker , [email protected] AIRE, association interdisciplinaire de recherche dur l'épistolaire, Sabine Kraenker, 01.01.2006 31.12.2006, Tunisia

APA, association pour l'autobiographie, Sabine Kraenker, 01.01.2006 31.12.2006, Tunisia

AIRE, association interdisciplinaire de recherche sur l épistolaire, Sabine Kraenker, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, Brazil

APA, Association pour l autobiographie, Sabine Kraenker, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, Brazil

AIRE, l'association interdisciplinaire de recherches sur l'épistolaire, Sabine Kraenker, 01.01.2008 31.12.2008, Estonia

APA, l'association pour l'autobiographie et le pattrimoine autobiographique, Sabine Kraenker, 01.01.2008 31.12.2008, Estonia

Päivi Kuivalainen , [email protected] Vantaan kieltenopettajat ry, Päivi Kuivalainen, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, Finland

Maija Liisa Könönen , [email protected] Devaid ry, Maija Liisa Könönen, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Finland

Devaid ry, Maija Liisa Könönen, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, Finland

ILLC/Pettersson

12



Devaid ry, Maija Liisa Könönen, 01.01.2008 31.12.2008, Finland

Bo Pettersson , [email protected] Svenska litteratursällskapetin eri toimikuntien jäsen: johtokunta, toimituskunta, vuosipalkintotoimikunta, Hallbergin palkintolautakunta, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2006 31.12.2006, Finland

Runebergsällskapet i Åbo r.f., Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, Finland

Runebergsällskapet i Åbo r.f., revisor, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2008 …, Finland

Mark Shackleton , [email protected] The Finnish- British Society, Helsinki, Mark Shackleton, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Finland

Finnish Matriculation Board (English language examinations), Mark Shackleton, 01.01.2006 31.12.2006, United Kingdom

The Finnish-British Society (varapuheenjohtaja), Mark Shackleton, 01.01.2006 31.12.2006, United Kingdom

Matriculation Board (English language Examinations), Mark Shackleton, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, United Kingdom

The Finnish-British Society, Helsinki, Mark Shackleton, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, United Kingdom

Finnish Matriculation Board (English Language Examinations), Mark Shackleton, 01.01.2008 31.12.2008, United Kingdom

The Finnish-British Society, Helsinki, Mark Shackleton, 01.01.2008 31.12.2008, United Kingdom

Irma Taavitsainen , [email protected] Chair of the organizing committee of a publicity event in honour of the 100th anniversary of the Finnish Academy of Science and Letters 29.11.2007, Irma Taavitsainen, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, Finland

Ulla Tuomarla , [email protected] SUOMI-RANSKA yhdistysten liitto, Ulla Tuomarla, 01.01.2007 31.12.2007, Finland

Suomi-Ranska yhdistysten liitto, Ulla Tuomarla, 01.01.2008 31.12.2008, Finland

Participation in interview for written media Mervi Helkkula , [email protected] 100 % Finlande (Le printemps de culture finlandaise à Paris 2008, Mervi Helkkula, 2008, France

Ben Hellman , [email protected] Esitelmätilaisuus Suomen Pietarin instituutissa, Ben Hellman, 10.05.2000 31.12.2011, Finland

Esbo medborgarinstitut (esitelmä), Ben Hellman, 28.03.2001 31.12.2011, Sweden

Finlands Svenska Television, Kulturprogram "Artur" (haastattelu), Ben Hellman, 26.11.2001 31.12.2011, Sweden

Helsingin kirjamessut (haastattelu), Ben Hellman, 26.10.2001 31.12.2011, Sweden

Suomen Pietarin instituutti, Ben Hellman, 15.02.2001 31.12.2011, Sweden

Suomen Pietarin instituutti, Ben Hellman, 16.05.2001 31.12.2011, Sweden

Esbo arbetarinstitut, Ben Hellman, 05.02.2004 31.12.2011, Finland

Helsingin kaupunginteatteri, Ben Hellman, 17.02.2006 31.12.2011, Denmark

Suomen venäjänopettajat ry:n kesäseminaari, Ben Hellman, 07.06.2006 31.12.2011, Denmark

Seminaari, Historiska institutionen, Helsingfors universitet, Ben Hellman, 08.05.2007 31.12.2011, Finland

Maija Liisa Könönen , [email protected] Pietari-seuran vuosikokous, Maija Liisa Könönen, 25.04.2002 31.12.2011, Estonia

Gennady Obatnin , [email protected] Kulttuurintutkimuksen gradun edistämisseminaari, Mikkeli, Gennady Obatnin, 25.01.2001 31.12.2011, Finland

Russko-finskij vecher literatury (venäläis-suomalainen kirjallisuusilta, Suomen Pietarin instituutti, Gennady Obatnin, 16.05.2001 31.12.2011, Finland

Uutta venäläisen kirjallisuuden tutkimusta Suomessa (Aleksanteri-instituutti/Yliopiston kirjasto), Gennady Obatnin, 27.02.2001 31.12.2011, Finland

ILLC/Pettersson

13



Venäjän ja Itä-Euroopan tutkimuksen maisterikoulun (Aleksanteri-instituutti) kesäkoulu, Orilampi, Gennady Obatnin, 25.08.2001 31.12.2011, Finland

Institute of Finnish Culture in St. Petersburg.Presentation of the book "History and Narration in Russian Culture", Gennady Obatnin, 27.11.2006 31.12.2011, Russia

Mari Johanna Pakkala-Weckström , [email protected] Universitas Helsingiensis 2/2006, Mari Johanna Pakkala-Weckström, 01.01.2006 31.12.2011, Finland

Pekka Pesonen , [email protected] Bulevardi-Foorumi, Helsinki, Pekka Pesonen, 08.02.2001 31.12.2011, Finland

Dostojevski elokuvassa (Suomen Elokuva-arkisto), Helsinki, Pekka Pesonen, 23.10.2001 31.12.2011, Finland

Etelä-Saimaa, Pekka Pesonen, 16.06.2001 31.12.2011, Finland

Haastattelu Länsi-Savo -lehdessä, Pekka Pesonen, 01.01.2001 31.12.2011, Finland

Kulttuurintutkimuksen seminaari (järjestäjänä Aleksanteri-instituutti) "Venäjä ja länsi", Mikkeli, Pekka Pesonen, 25.01.2001 31.12.2011, Finland

Russko-finskij vecher literatury (venäläis-suomalainen kirjallisuusilta), Suomen Pietarin instituutti, Pekka Pesonen, 16.05.2001 31.12.2011, Finland

Slavistien talvipäivä "Slaavilaisen kirjallisuuden kääntäminen ja kustantaminen" (järjestäjä Suomen Slavistipiiri ry), Pekka Pesonen, 02.02.2001 31.12.2011, Finland

Summer School for Semiotics and Structural Studies/Kirjallisuuden ja kulttuurin semiotiikka, Pekka Pesonen, 13.06.2001 31.12.2011, Finland

Uutisvuoksi, Pekka Pesonen, 16.06.2001 31.12.2011, Finland

Uutta venäläisen kirjallisuuden tutkimusta Suomessa (Aleksanteri-instituutti/Yliopiston kirjasto), Pekka Pesonen, 27.02.2001 31.12.2011, Finland

Venäjän ja Itä-Euroopan tutkimuksen maisterikoulu (Aleksanteri-instituutti), Orilampi, Pekka Pesonen, 26.08.2001 31.12.2011, Finland

Nerontuotteita maailmankirjallisuudesta - välähdyksiä suomennosten historiaan, Pekka Pesonen, 25.09.2002 31.12.2011, Finland

Studia Russica, Pekka Pesonen, 10.12.2002 31.12.2011, Finland

Venäjä ja Suomi - vierekkäin ja vastakkain, Pekka Pesonen, 15.10.2002 31.12.2011, Finland

Esitelmä Pietari-luentosarjassa Suomalaisessa yhteiskoulussa Helsingissä, Pekka Pesonen, 16.09.2003 31.12.2011, Finland

Haastattelu Yle 1:n kulttuuriuutisissa, Pekka Pesonen, 11.08.2003 31.12.2011, Finland

Juhani Aho -Seuran seminaari: Eurooppalainen Pietari - kultakauden kosketuksia, Pekka Pesonen, 20.09.2003 31.12.2011, Finland

Moskovan kansainväliset kirjamessut (Mezhdunarodnaja knizhnaja jarmarka Non/fictioNo5), Pekka Pesonen, 28.11.2003 31.12.2011, Finland

Pietarilaiset kulttuuri-iltamat Helsingin taiteiden yönä, Pekka Pesonen, 28.08.2003 31.12.2011, Finland

Slavistien syyspäivä: Nykypäivän Pietari - haasteita, mahdollisuuksia, kulttuuria ja vapaa-aikaa, Pekka Pesonen, 10.10.2003 31.12.2011, Finland

Vanhan kirjallisuuden päivät (Vammala), Pekka Pesonen, 27.06.2003 31.12.2011, Finland

haastattelu Yle 1:ssä (venäjänkieliset ohjelmat, toimittaja Heli Kostov), Pekka Pesonen, 27.05.2003 31.12.2011, Finland

Helsingin Sanomat, Pekka Pesonen, 01.01.2004 31.12.2011, Finland

Itämeri-instituutin Tampereella järjestämä seminaari "Kulttuurintuntemus - avain menestykseen Venäjän kaupassa", Pekka Pesonen, 07.09.2004 31.12.2011, Finland

Katajanokan Rotary-klubi, Pekka Pesonen, 07.09.2004 31.12.2011, Finland

Semiotiikan talvikoulu, Pekka Pesonen, 07.02.2004 31.12.2011, Finland

Suomen Akatemian lehti'A propos' 3/2004 ja Suomen Akatemian englanninkielinen julkaisu 'Academia', Pekka Pesonen, 01.01.2004 31.12.2011, Finland


ILLC/Pettersson

14



Imatra venäläisessä kulttuurissa. Järjestäjä: Sibelius-Akatemia, Imatran konserttihovi Kaakkois-Suomi - Pietari -kulttuurimatkailun vetovoimatekijöiden kehittämishanke, Pekka Pesonen, 14.04.2005 31.12.2011, Finland

Kirjallisuusluentosarja Pietarista. Järjestäjät: Suomi-Venäjä-Seura ja Venäjän tiede- ja kulttuurikeskus, Pekka Pesonen, 22.09.2005 31.12.2011, Finland

Kirjallisuusluentosarja Pietarista. Järjestäjät: Suomi-Venäjä-Seura ja Venäjän tiede- ja kulttuurikeskus, Pekka Pesonen, 27.10.2005 31.12.2011, Finland

Luentosarja "Musiikin kansalliset erikoisuudet". Järjestäjä: Helsingin yliopiston musiikkiseura, Pekka Pesonen, 19.09.2005 31.12.2011, Finland

Seminaari "Museot ja matkailu". Järjestäjä: Imatran kaupunki, Pekka Pesonen, 06.06.2005 31.12.2011, Finland

Venäläinen talvi Suomen Kansallisoopperassa. Järjestäjä: Suomen Kansallisooppera, Pekka Pesonen, 03.02.2005 31.12.2011, Finland

Yleisötilaisuus: kirjanystävien risteily Pietariin. Järjestäjä: Suuri Suomalainen Kirjakerho ja Anna-lehti, Pekka Pesonen, 16.04.2005 31.12.2011, Finland


Helsingin yliopiston Venäjä-osaaminen kutsuseminaari, Pekka Pesonen, 26.04.2006 31.12.2011, Finland

Malye Bannye chtenija 2006, Pietari, Pekka Pesonen, 27.11.2006 31.12.2011, Finland

Venäjän ja Itä-Euroopan tutkimuksen tutkijakoulun venäläisen filosofian ja aatehistorian kevätseminaari, Pekka Pesonen, 21.04.2006 31.12.2011, Finland

Venäläisiä muotokuvia. Helsingin yliopiston venäläisen kirjallisuuden tutkijat esittelevät tutkimustaan., Pekka Pesonen, 10.05.2006 31.12.2011, Finland

Ajan kohina Venäjän kirjallisuus 1900-luvun taitteessa. Luentosarja Turun suomenkielisessä työväenopistossa., Pekka Pesonen, 19.11.2007 31.12.2011, Finland

Revisiting Perestroika.7th Annual Aleksanteri Conference., Pekka Pesonen, 30.11.2007 31.12.2011, Finland

Savonlinnan kesäyliopisto & Savonlinnan oopperajuhlat, Venäjä-viikko, Pekka Pesonen, 25.07.2007 31.12.2011, Finland

WSOY:n kirjallisuustoimikunnan Pietari-seminaari, Pekka Pesonen, 27.08.2007 31.12.2011, Finland

Helsingin Juhlaviikot, Finlandia-talo, Pekka Pesonen, 21.08.2008 31.12.2011, Finland

Jaan Kross mestari. Yleisöluentosarja Helsingin yliopistossa (järj. Tuglas-Seura), Pekka Pesonen, 10.04.2008 31.12.2011, Finland

Maaginen maisema¿. Teoksia Tretjakovin gallerian kokoelmista. Näyttely Helsingin kaupungin taidemuseossa (Meilahti), Pekka Pesonen, 15.03.2008 31.12.2011, Finland

Venäläisen kirjallisuuden klassikko. Onko venäläinen kirjallisuus kuollut?, Pekka Pesonen, 10.2010 …, Finland

Mark Shackleton , [email protected] The Association of English Teachers in Finland Summer Course, Tammisaari, Mark Shackleton, 06.08.2002 31.12.2011, Finland

"Arthur" ( Finlands Svenskt cultural programme), Mark Shackleton, 11.03.2003 31.12.2011, Finland

Helsinki työväenopisto English teachers, Mark Shackleton, 28.11.2003 31.12.2011, Finland

Yhe Association of English Teachers in Finland Summer Course. Rauhalahti., Mark Shackleton, 01.08.2003 31.12.2011, Finland

British Studies Seminar, The Association of Teachers of English in Finland, Mark Shackleton, 29.07.2004 31.12.2011, Finland





Pirkanmaan kieltenopettajat ry, syyskoulutuspäivä, Mark Shackleton, 18.09.2004 31.12.2011, Finland

TOOLin kieltenopettajien kevätpäivät, Jyväskylän Ammattikorkeakoulu, Kielikeskus, Mark Shackleton, 18.05.2004 31.12.2011, Finland

British and Irish Studies Programme, Renvall Institute, Mark Shackleton, 20.04.2005 31.12.2011, Finland

Koulutuspäivä kieltenopettajille Pohjois-Karjalan ammattikorkeakoulu, Joensuu, Mark Shackleton, 09.05.2005 31.12.2011, Finland

Teacher s evening, Metsätalo, Mark Shackleton, 15.03.2005 31.12.2011, Finland

ILLC/Pettersson

15



The Association of Teachers of English in Finland, British Studies Seminar: Using Media, Mark Shackleton, 03.08.2005 31.12.2011, Finland

The Federation of Finnish-British Societies Seminar on Bad English British Embassy, Helsinki, Mark Shackleton, 30.09.2005 31.12.2011, Finland

The Association of English Teachers in Finland summer course., Mark Shackleton, 02.08.2006 31.12.2011, United Kingdom



Finnish-British Society, Helsinki, Mark Shackleton, 28.11.2007 31.12.2011, United Kingdom

Timo Suni , [email protected] Lapin virkamiesten Venäjä-koulutus (luento Lapin yliopistossa), Timo Suni, 17.03.2000 31.12.2011, Finland

Ulla Tuomarla , [email protected] Tiedekahvila (YLE), Ulla Tuomarla, 02.10.2007 31.12.2011, Finland

Esitelmä Mikkelin kaupunginkirjastossa, Ulla Tuomarla, 19.03.2008 31.12.2011, Finland

Kirjakauppa Arkadia, Helsinki, Ulla Tuomarla, 12.12.2008 31.12.2011, Finland

Lahden Suomi-Ranska yhdistys, Ulla Tuomarla, 29.10.2008 31.12.2011, Finland

Tiina Wikström , [email protected] Intiaanitutkimusta humanistivoimin, Tiina Wikström, 2008, Finland

Participation in radio programme Ben Hellman , [email protected] Radio-ohjelma "Jag läste häromdagen", Ben Hellman, 24.02.2006 31.12.2011, Finland

Radio Vega, Kulturtimmen, Ben Hellman, 08.08.2008 31.12.2011, Finland

Pekka Pesonen , [email protected] Radio-ohjelma: Keskustelusarja "Venäläiset vieraat" (Yle 1), Pekka Pesonen, 01.01.2005 31.12.2011, Finland

Nadja Novakin kirjakerho. Radio-ohjelma (Yle 1). Keskustelu, jossa läsnä toimittaja Nadja Nowak sekä prof. Yrjö Sepänmaa, kirjailija Kristina Carlson, kirjailija Liisa Mäntymies, ent. kustannuspällikkö Paula Pesonen ja Pekka Pesonen, Pekka Pesonen, 23.12.2007 31.12.2011, Finland

Viisasten kerho. Radio-ohjelma (Yle 1). Keskustelu toimittaja Eeva Luotosen ja ohjaaja Esa Leskisen kanssa., Pekka Pesonen, 01.01.2007 31.12.2011, Finland

Radio Yle 1. Kultakuume, Pekka Pesonen, 21.08.2008 31.12.2011, Finland

Radio Yle 1. Kultakuume, Pekka Pesonen, 04.08.2008 31.12.2011, Finland

Radio Yle 1. Ykkösaamu, Pekka Pesonen, 04.08.2008 31.12.2011, Finland

Dostojevski: Idiootti. Radiokeskustelu. Suora lähetys. 3h, Pekka Pesonen, 04.09.2010

Bo Pettersson , [email protected] Boksalongen, Radio Vega, Yleisradio, Helsinki, Bo Pettersson, 01.01.2005 31.12.2005, Sweden

Boksalongen, Radio Vega (kaksi lähetystä), Bo Pettersson, 26.08.2008, Finland

Participation in TV programme Maija Liisa Könönen , [email protected] Haastattelu, Maija Liisa Könönen, 07.04.2010, Sweden

Appendix B.b. Maria Forsman, Chief Information Specialist, DSocSc Helsinki University Library 7.7.2011 The bibliometric analyses by Helsinki University Library (HULib) Background: The bibliometric analyses – especially citation analyses – have raised a lot of discussion and critics among researchers in social sciences and humanities. Researchers view that bibliometric analyses are often unfair to these fields of sciences because they do not give a good enough picture of the publishing. Citation databases – Web of Science and Scopus – cover only weakly the main publications in these fields. Also, in humanities and social sciences monograph is still the main form of publishing, and it does not include in these article databases. At the University of Helsinki, the above mentioned concerns have been taken into account in the evaluation. The Evaluation Office has ordered analyses from the Helsinki University Library (HULib) for the participating researcher communities that are weakly represented in Web of Science. The database for the HULib analyses is TUHAT (https://tuhat.halvi.helsinki.fi/portal/en/) including all the publications that the researchers have considered important. Based on this data, information specialists at HULib have carried out the following analyses:

1) Number of authors/publication/year as a table; a pie of authors/publication in the period 2005-2010; 2) Language of publication/year; a pie of language of publication in the period 2005-2010; 3) Articles/journal/year; journals have been compared by ISSN with the Norwegian, Australian and ERIH (2007-2008) journal ranking lists; number of articles in ranked journals; 4) Publisher/monograph type (according to TUHAT database); monographs have been compared with the Norwegian publisher ranking list. According to this, it has been counted how many monographs are published by a leading scientific publisher (2) or a scientific publisher (1). 5) Conference publications (from TUHAT database) especially in computer sciences; compared with the Australian conference ranking list. Where relevant, some additional analyses and notes concerning the publication culture of a scientific field have been added. Overall, these analyses complement the other evaluation material and lists of the publications of the participating researcher communities. If the publications of the RCs were less than 50 or/and the internal coverage less than 40 percentage, the WoS analyses were considered not reliable. These RCs were 58 altogether. In addition, both Leiden and Library analyses were done to the RCs if WoS analyses covered less than 40 per cent of the peer review (A+C) publications of the RC. These RCs were 8 altogether. The appendix includes the analyses of the RC under discussion.

https://tuhat.halvi.helsinki.fi/portal/en/

Analysis of publications by Helsinki University Library – 66 RCs altogether Biological, Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences Luukkanen, Olavi– VITRI Valsta, Lauri – SUVALUE Natural Sciences Abrahamsson, Pekka – SOFTSYS Kangasharju, Jussi – NODES Ukkonen, Esko – ALKO Väänänen, Jouko – HLG Humanities Aejmelaeus, Anneli – CSTT Anttonen, Pertti – CMVG Dunderberg, Ismo – FC Havu, Eva – CoCoLaC Heikkilä, Markku – RCSP Heinämaa, Sara – SHC Henriksson, Markku – CITA Janhunen, Juha – LDHFTA Kajava Mika, – AMNE Klippi, Anu – Interaction Knuuttila, Simo – PPMP Koskenniemi, Kimmo – BAULT Lauha, Aila – CECH Lavento, Mika – ARCH-HU Lukkarinen, Ville – AHCI Lyytikäinen, Pirjo – GLW Mauranen, Anna – LFP Meinander, Henrik – HIST Nevalainen, Terttu – VARIENG Pettersson, Bo – ILLC Pulkkinen, Tuija – Gender Studies Pyrhönen, Heta – ART Ruokanen, Miikka – RELDIAL Saarinen, Risto – RELSOC Sandu, Gabriel – LMPS Tarasti, Eero – MusSig Vehmas-Lehto, Inkeri – TraST Östman, Jan-Ola – LMS The next appendix includes the analyses of the RC under discussion.

Social Sciences Airaksinen, Timo – PPH Engeström, Yrjö – CRADLE Granberg, Leo - TRANSRURBAN Haila, Anne – Sociopolis Hautamäki, Jarkko – CEA Heinonen, Visa – KUMU Helén, Ilpo – STS Hukkinen, Janne – GENU Jallinoja, Riitta – SBII Kaartinen, Timo – SCA Kettunen, Pauli - NordSoc Kivinen, Markku – FCREES Koponen, Juhani – DEVERELE Koskenniemi, Martti – ECI Kultti, Klaus – EAT Lahelma, Elina – KUFE Lanne, Markku – TSEM Lavonen, Jari – RCMSER Lehtonen, Risto – SocStats Lindblom-Ylänne, Sari – EdPsychHE Nieminen, Hannu – MECOL Nuotio, Kimmo – Law Nyman, Göte – METEORI Ollikainen, Markku – ENFIFO Pirttilä-Backman, Anna-Maija – DYNASOBIC Rahkonen, Keijo – CulCap Roos, J P – HELPS Simola, Hannu – SOCE-DGI Sulkunen, Pekka – PosPus Sumelius, John – AG ECON Vaattovaara, Mari – STRUTSI Vainio, Martti – SigMe


20.6.2011 PJK / 19.4.2012 MF

PUBLICATION DATA 2005-2010

RC/ILLC/Pettersson

Category 3. The research of the participating community is distinct from mainstream research, and the special features of the research tradition in the field must be considered in the evaluation.

Number of authors in publications/year

No. of authors 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Grand Total 1 23 29 21 36 33 33 175 2 3 6 11 11 6 16 53 3 4 1 4 2 4 15 4 2 2 3 1 2 10 6 1 1 2 5 1 1 9 1 1 8 1 1 Grand Total 30 37 37 55 43 56 258

The publications have mostly only one author (68 %).

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

1

2

3

4

5

6

8

9

Language of publication / Year

Language 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Grand Total English en_GB 16 13 18 32 27 29 135 Finnish fi_FI 6 12 8 13 2 10 51 French fr_FR 1 5 7 2 11 7 33 Russian ru_RU 2 6 3 6 2 10 29 Swedish sv_SE 3 1 1 5 Multiple languages mult 1 1 1 3 Undefined/Other und 1 1 German de_DE 1 1 Grand Total 30 37 37 55 43 56 258

The commonest language is English ( 52 %), as Finnish (20 %) in the second place.

1 au 68 %

2 au 21 %

3 au 6 %

4 au 4 %

6 au 1 %

8 au 0 %

9 au 0 %

5 au 0 %

% of au in publications 2005-2010

Journal / Year / Total

Journal 2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Grand

Total

Helsingin Sanomat 1 1 5 1 4 12 Idäntutkimus 1 1 3 5 Scando-Slavica 3 3 Poétique : revue de théorie et d'analyse littéraires 1 1 2 Kääntäjä - Översättaren 2 2 Portti : Tampereen science fiction seuran lehti 1 1 2 Helsinki English studies 2 2 Synteesi : taiteidenvälisen tutkimuksen aikakauslehti 1 1 2 Kajo' : lehti Amerikan alkuperäiskansoista 1 1 2 Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 1 1 2 Politics and Culture 1 1 Journal of Literary Theory 1 1 Ikaros 1 1 European English messenger. 1 1 Poetics Today 1 1 Källan : Svenska litteratursällskapet informerar 1 1 Russkaâ literatura 1 1

en_GB 52 %

fi_FI 20 %

fr_FR 13 %

ru_RU 11 %

sv_SE 2 %

mult 1 %

und 1 %

de_DE 0 %

Language of Publications 2005-2010

Extrapolation 1 1 Uralin pihlaja 1 1 Latin-American journal of fundamental psychopathology on line

1 1

Poetica 1 1 Museo : Suomen museoliiton julkaisu 1 1 Helsinki University Bulletin 1 1 English today 1 1 Hufvudstadsbladet 1 1 Novyj mir iskusstva 1 1 Finn-Brits 1 1 Paradoxa 1 1 Tieteessä tapahtuu 1 1 Parnasso 1 1 Yours truly 1 1 Partial Answers 1 1 Pedagogy 1 1 Grand Total 9 9 9 14 7 9 57

The following titles were excluded from the table (not journals):

First and other nations

Linguistik und Ubersetzung in Kouvola

Narrative and identity

Kuolleet sielut

Journal ranking (Norway, Australia, ERIH)

Journal Titles

Grand Total

Norw

ay

Australia

ERIH A

rchaeology (2007)

ERIH Linguistics (2007)

ERIH Literature (2008)

ERIH Pedagogical and

Educational Research (2007)

Idäntutkimus 5 1 Scando-Slavica 3 2 B C B Poétique : revue de théorie et d'analyse littéraires 2 2 A* A Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 2 1 A B Politics and Culture 1 B Journal of Literary Theory 1 1 B European English messenger. 1 B

Poetics Today 1 2 A Russkaâ literatura 1 1 C Extrapolation 1 1 B B Latin-American journal of fundamental psychopathology on line

1

English today 1 1 C Paradoxa 1 C Parnasso 1 C Partial Answers 1 1 B B Pedagogy 1 B B Grand Total 24

Amount of ranked articles (Norway)

Norway Journal articles

Level 2 6

Level 1 12

Amount of ranked articles (Australia)

Australia Journal articles

Level A* 2

Level A 2

Level B 8

Level C 3

Book publishers

Publisher ranking (based on Norwegian ranking list) 2 = leading scientific 1 =scientific no = non-scientific or not ranked

C1 Published scientific monograph (5)C2 Edited book, compilation, conference proceeding or special issue of journal (42)D5 Text book or professional handbook or guidebook or dictionary (0)E2 Popular monograph (1)

18 books of 48 have been published by a high ranked leading scientific publisher, 7 by a ranked scientific publisher.

Publisher

c1_scientific_monograph

c2_edited_book_compila

tion_conferenceproceedings_special

e2_popular_monograph

Grand Total

Publisher ranking

John Benjamins 14 14 2 Société Néophilologique 4 4 no Mouton de Gruyter 3 3 2 University of Helsinki 2 2 no Helsingin yliopisto, slavistiikan ja baltologian laitos 1 2 3 no Novoe lit. obozrenie : Kaf. slavistiki Un-ta 2 2 no The Research Unit for Variation, Contacts and Change in English (VARIENG)

1 1 no

Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier 1 1 1 VDM Verlag Dr. Muller 1 1 1 Aleksanteri-instituutti 1 1 no Suomen kielitieteellinen yhdistys 1 1 no Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis 1 1 no Basam Books 1 1 no Institute for Russia and Eastern Europe 1 1 no University of Texas Press 1 1 1 Equinox Pub 1 1 2 Yliopistopaino = Helsinki University Press 1 1 no Lang 2 2 1 University of Turku 1 1 no McGill-Queen's University Press 1 1 no Cambridge Scholars Publishing 1 1 1 Université de Helsinki, Département des langues romanes 3 3 no ibidem-Verlag 1 1 1 Grand Total 5 42 1 48

University of Helsinki Administrative Publications 80/92 Evaluations ISBN 978-952-10-7512-4 (PDF) ISSN 1795-5513 (Online) Internet address: http://www.helsinki.fi/julkaisut/aineisto/rc_evaluation2012/hallinnon_julkaisuja_80_92_2012.pdf

International Evaluation of Research and Doctoral Training ... · INTERNATIONAL EVALUA TION OF...

Documents

Transcript of International Evaluation of Research and Doctoral Training ... · INTERNATIONAL EVALUA TION OF...