Interior Modernization Blueprint Approach
description
Transcript of Interior Modernization Blueprint Approach
Interior Enterprise Architecture (IEA)
Department of the Interior Enterprise Architecture Overview
DOI Process for Modernization Blueprints – a “Take-Action” Approach to Enterprise Architecture
Page 2
Interior Enterprise Architecture (IEA)
SD
EPA
RTM E
U
M AR CH 3 , 1 8 4 9
TN T HE
INT E
RIO
R
“Take-Action” Approach to Enterprise Architecture: A Methodology to transition to a Target Architecture
Application 1
Users
UserInterface
Business Rules and Logic
Data Access
Application 2
Users
Application 3
Users
Data 1 Data 2
BL5 BL6
User Interface
Code
BL1 BL2’
BL3’ BL4
Data 2’ Data 3
User Interface
Code
BL1’ BL2
BL5’’ BL7
BL8 BL9
Data 2’’ Data 4
Data Access
BL5’ BL8’
User Interface
Code
BL2’’ BL3
Application 1
Users
UserInterface
Business Rules and Logic
Data Access
Application 2
Users
Application 3
Users
Data 1 Data 2
BL5 BL6
User Interface
Code
BL1 BL2’
BL3’ BL4
Data 2’ Data 3
User Interface
Code
BL1’ BL2
BL5’’ BL7
BL8 BL9
Data 2’’ Data 4
Data Access
BL5’ BL8’
User Interface
Code
BL2’’ BL3 Transition
Plan
Transition
Plan
Assessment
Actions(Enhancements,
Efficiencies, Strategies)Vision
Page 3
Interior Enterprise Architecture (IEA)
SD
EPA
RTM E
U
M AR CH 3 , 1 8 4 9
TN T HE
INT E
RIO
R
How is the approach Take-Action?
Evaluate systems for: Which systems are old and/or costly to maintain?
• Develop recommendations on how to move forward are rectify Opportunities to tie systems together more effectively.
• Identify systems that need to talk but don’t
• Identify business process issues that are not currently addressed. Opportunities to centralize information assets.
• Improve reporting, security and data integrity. Evaluate system’s capabilities for supporting strategic goals and objectives
• Evaluate against end and intermediate strategic outcomes and measures
Deliver short and longer-term recommendations that can be acted upon: Which systems would need to be consolidated. Which systems would benefit from shared application services. Potential investment proposals that may need to be considered now. Comprehensive views of how the IT systems support the lines of business.
Page 4
Interior Enterprise Architecture (IEA)
SD
EPA
RTM E
U
M AR CH 3 , 1 8 4 9
TN T HE
INT E
RIO
R
Take-Action Approach to Enterprise Architecture – Four Phases
1. Establish Methodology for
Defining Modernization
Blueprint.
2. Determine Scope of
Assessment and Collect Data
3. Assess Alignment With FEA and DOI Architectures
4. Develop Tactical and
Strategic Modernization
Blueprints
DepartmentEnterprise
ArchitectureRepository
(DEAR)
The Department Enterprise Architecture Repository (or DEAR)will be the system of record for critical EA information.
Modernization blueprints – a related set of tactical and strategic modernization recommendations.
Page 5
Interior Enterprise Architecture (IEA)
SD
EPA
RTM E
U
M AR CH 3 , 1 8 4 9
TN T HE
INT E
RIO
R
1. Establish Conceptual Vision of Target Architecture - Criteria
Business Assessment Criteria
Data Assessment Criteria
Technology Assessment Criteria
Application Assessment Criteria
The criteria is derived from IEA Conceptual Architecture Principles (CAP) & Common Requirements Vision (CRV) and is used to assess how well a system aligns with the
target state.
1. Establish Methodology Modernization
Blueprint
2. Determine Scope of
Assessment and Collect Data
3. Assess Alignment With FEA and DOI Architectures
4. Develop Tactical and
Strategic Modernization
Blueprints
Security Assessment Criteria
Page 6
Interior Enterprise Architecture (IEA)
SD
EPA
RTM E
U
M AR CH 3 , 1 8 4 9
TN T HE
INT E
RIO
R
2. Determine Scope of Assessment and Collect Data - Process
Future Project 4
System 10System 1
System 4
System 5
System 2
System 3Future Project 2
System 7
System 8
System 9
Subject MatterExpert
Interviews andDocumentation
Reviews
Modernization BlueprintInterview Guide
Modernization BlueprintInterview Guide
Validation / Reports / Findings
Validation / Reports / Findings
ProjectArchitecture
PerformanceReferenceModel
BusinessReferenceModel
Data andInformationReferenceModel
TechnicalReferenceModel
ServiceComponentReferenceModel
System 6
Future Project 1
Future Project 3
Scope Document
Scope Document
SystemGrouping
1. Establish Methodology
Modernization Blueprint
2. Determine Scope of
Assessment and Collect Data
3. Assess Alignment With FEA and DOI Architectures
4. Develop Tactical and
Strategic Modernization
Blueprints
Page 7
Interior Enterprise Architecture (IEA)
SD
EPA
RTM E
U
M AR CH 3 , 1 8 4 9
TN T HE
INT E
RIO
R
1. Establish Methodology
Modernization Blueprint
2. Determine Scope of
Assessment and Collect Data
3. Assess Alignment With FEA and DOI Architectures
4. Develop Tactical and
Strategic Modernization
Blueprints
2. Determine Scope of Assessment and Collect Data
Field Data Collection Templates are used to collect the systems dataTop Three Mission Goals for System Top Three Issues For System Interviewee Name Interview Date Reference Docs
1.02 Provide for Environmentally Responsible Commercial Activities
Reporting system not able to handle reporting on more than eight field office backups at a time - Excel is used to gather consolidated reporting statistics. Leon Pack 4/18/2003
1.05 Provide Land, Resource Title Info2.01 Understand the Condition of Public Lands
System (PK) System Comments
Rangeland Improvement Project System
Version (PK) Description Acronym Owning Organization Portfolio Owner Security Category
Systems Coordination Office Phase Operational Status Operational Month Operational Year
Deployment Scope Within Enterprise
Unknown
Inventory of rangeland improvements (cattleguards, fences, pipelines, reservoirs, wells, spring developments, vegetation treatments, etc) placed on the public lands for resource improvement and management of livestock grazing. RIPS
Bureau of Land Management AD-200 Under GSS Umbrella Not Tracked Operational 6 1988 National
Subsystem (PK) Rangeland Improvement Project System Reporting
Version (PK) Description Acronym Portfolio Owner User CommunitiesMaximum User
DesignPeak Concurrent
User Design Current User TotalPeak Concurrent User
TotalGeographic User
Distribution User Design
Comment
Unknown
Reporting on the inventory of rangeland improvements placed on the public lands for resource improvement and management of livestock grazing. RIPSR AD-200 Unknown 1 1 1 1 Center Office Users
Used only at the Denver Federal Center.
System Component (PK)Rangeland Improvement Project System Reporting
Version (PK) Description External System Component? Acronym Owning Organization Portfolio OwnerSponsoring Programs
Maintaining Programs Supporting Projects
Unknown
Reporting on the inventory of rangeland improvements placed on the public lands for resource improvement and management of livestock grazing. F RIPSR
Bureau of Land Management AD-200
Architecture Metadata for System Component Component ArchitectureMiddleware Architecture
Database Architecture Security Architecture
Security Authentication Model
Security Authorization Model Security Comment
Technical Reference Model Properties Data Access component None Hierarchical DBMSReuse of COTS security component
Userid and password Administrative User
Security model reused from PC Focus development tool including coarse-grained authorization
Other System Component Architecture Props Business Logic componentSystem Component Comments Monolithic Presentation component
Deployment Information for System Component Systems Coordination Office Phase Operational Status Operational Month Operational Year
Deployment Scope Within
Enterprise Deployment Scope Outside Enterprise Ownership Model
Construction Modification Level
Modification Eligibility
Not Tracked Operational 6 1988 National Not Applicable Commercial Off The Shelf Unknown Maintenance Only
Deployment Processing Node for System Component Processing Node Name (PK)Processing Node Asset
ID (PK)Processing Node
Description Building Office
Code Building Number Node Serial Number Hardware Product
Operating System Name
Operating System Version
First Node Intel-Generic Generic
Intel platforms running MS-DOS versions less than WIN-95 nirm 50 Generic Intel Unknown
MS-DOS Operating system 6_22
Second NodeThird Node
RIPS RAS
Business Area Line of Business Sub Function BLM Function Work Activity PEPlace an 'x' in this column for every Service Component that this System
Component implements.
Place an 'x' in this column for every Service Component that this System
Component implements.
Develop & Issue Federal Fluid Mineral Leases
EI
Process Coal Leases ELProcess Indian Pre-Lease Actions
FK
Process Hydropower Licenses FN
Process Fluid Minerals APDs EJ
Process Fluid Minerals Sundry Notices
FJ
Process Coal Post-Lease Actions
EM
Process Oil & Gas Reservoir Management Agreements
FF
Process Administrative Changes Post Lease Federal Fluid Minerals
FI
Evaluate Forest & Woodland Treatments
MB
Conduct Census on WH&B Areas
MC
Monitor Wilderness & Wilderness Study Areas
MD
Evaluate Rangeland Health MJRAS - information used for eval
Monitor Herd Management Areas
MP
Monitor Grazing Allotments MLRAS - information used for eval
Monitor Terrestorial Habitat MQ RAS - information used for evalMonitor Species Populations MRMonitor Water Resources MU RIPS - record of improvementsMonitor Shrub & Grass Treatments
MXRIPS - record of treatments RAS - information used for eval
Monitor Non-Sec 106 Cultural Properties & Paleontological Localities
MY
Monitor Fire Rehab Treatments
MZRIPS - record of treatments
Maintain Shrub, Grassland, PJ, Forest Projects
JCRIPS - record of treatments RAS - authorizations used as tool
Remediate AML Physical Safety Hazards
HP
Implement AML Projects to Restore Water Quality
JK
Inventory Abandoned Mine Land Sites
BH
Respond to Hazmat Risk Sites HO
Process HazMat Cost Avoidance & Recovery Cases
NQ
Mitigate Other (Non-HazMat) Sites
HQ
Monitor & Maintain HazMat & NRDAR Sites
MG
Conduct Emergency RehabilitationPlug Orphan Wells & Restore LandscapeMonitor Hazardous Fuels Treatments
MT
Provide Support to Restore Helath of Public Lands
PHRIPS - record of improvements RAS - rangeland health data table
Restore Forest & Woodlands JE
Apply Weed Treatments JDRIPS - record of treatments
Apply Lake & Wetland Treatments
JF
Apply Stream & Riparian Treatments
JGRIPS - record of treatments RAS - grazing is a treatment
Construct Lake/Wetland/Stream/Riparian Projects
JH
Apply Fire Rehabilitation Treatments
JLRIPS - records of EFR activities RAS - grazing may be the tool used
Plan for T&E Species Recovery
DK
Implement Special Status Species Recovery & Conservation Actions
JPRAS - accommodate mediation
Respond to Public Health & Safety Incidents
NN
Conduct Other Law Enforcement Activities
NO
Process Cost Recovery Or Civil Enforcement Cases
NQ
Provide Support to Homeland SecurityEmergency Closures NORespond to Public Health & Safety Incidents
NN
Recuce Threats to Publics and Property
AF
Process Tresspass & Unauthorized Occupancy Cases
NJRIPS - record of improvements RAS - grazing trespass
Respond to Natural Resource/Property Incidents
NLRIPS - improvement maint/vandalism RAS - grazing trespass
Evaluate PRPs for Cost Recovery
NP
Develop Supplemental Rules NOInspect Dams HK RIPS - record of inspectionsInspect Bridges HJ
Inspect Public Water Supplies
Maintain Lake/Wetland/Stream/Riparian Projects
JIRIPS - record of maintenance
Evaluate Weed Treatments MKRIPS - record of treatments
Evaluate Lake & Wetland Habitat
MN
Monitor Stram & Riparian Habitat
MORIPS - record of treatments
Monitor Fire Rehabilitation Treatments
MZRIPS - record of treatments/efr
Assess Alaska Minerals BBInventory Non-Sec 106 Cultural & FLPMA/NEPA Paleontological Resources
BC
Inventory Wilderness Character
BE
Assess Hazard Sites & Facilities
BF
Assess Other Hazards BGInventory Water Resources BNAssess Sub-basin & Regional Landscapes
CA
Inventory Soil Resources BO
Assess Watersheds BPRAS - Rangeland health data table
Complete Ecological Site Inventory
BQ
Inventory Wildlife & Plant Habitats
CB
Inventory Shrub/Grass/PJ Vegetation
BR
Inventory for Noxious Weeds BS
Inventory Forest & Woodland Vegetation
BT
Inventory Wetlands & Lakes BUInventory Stream & Riparian Areas
BV
Process Non-Section 106 Cultural & Paleo Data
FD
Catalog BLM Museum Objects BWRIPS - why limited to cultural, where is the catalog of investments
Provide Program Support to Commercial Activities
PBRIPS - record of improvements
Provide Program Support for Natural & Cultural Heritage
PC
Provide Support on Condition of Public Lands
PG
Provide Support for Technical & Economic Assistance
PF
Prepare Pre-Land Use Plan DNComplete Land Use Plan Scoping Report & Planning Criteria
DO
Prepare Draft Land Use Plan DP
Prepare Proposed LUP & Final EIS
DQ
Resolve Protest & Prepare ROD
DR
Prepare Draft EIS & Level LUP Amendments
DS
Prepare Final LUP & Amendment & ROD
DT
Prepare EA Level LUP Amendment & Decision Record
DU
Evaluate Land Use Plans DJ
Plan for Commercial Activities DB
Prepare Wilderness/WSR/NSHT/Cultural Activities
DC
Plan for Interdisciplinary Activities
DF
Plan For Herd Management Levels
DI
Restore Cultural & Paleo Properties
HF
Catalog BLM Museum Objects BWRIPS - why limited to cultural, where is the catalog of investments
Ensure Fire Preparedness HT
Apply Shrub & Grassland Vegetation Treatments
JARIPS - record of treatments RAS - grazing is a treatment
Construct Shrub, Grallsand, PJ, Forest Projects
JB
Implement Fuels Management Treatment Outside the Wildland Urban Interface
JM
RIPS - record of treatments RAS - grazing is a treatmentApply Development Treatments for Forest and Woodland Restoration
JNRIPS - record of treatments
Implement Fuels Management Treatment Within the Wildland Urban Interface
JW
RIPS - record of treatments RAS - grazing is a treatmentDesignate Sites for PreservationMonitor Air & Resource Conditions
MI
Provide Technology TransferEnsure Fire Preparedness HTSuppress Wildland Fires HUImplement Fuel Treatment Within Wildland Urban Interface
JWRIPS - record of treatments RAS - grazing is a treatment
Reduce Fuel Loads JMRIPS - grazing is a treatment RAS - grazing is a treatment
Provide Outreach for Natural & Cultural Heritage
AE
Provide Outreach Through Environmental Education
AL
Provide Customer Service for Economic & Technical Assistance
AH
Provide Outreach & Customer Service for Commercial Activities
AC
Provide Land & Title Information
AG
Process FOIA & Appeals BX RIPS - data storage accessedPost Authorized Use Records to Case File
BXRIPS - record of improvements
Capture Digital Record of Authorized Use
BMRIPS - record of improvements RAS - tabular not spacial
Manage Public Land Records BXRIPS - record of impmts/treatments RAS - auths/apps/bills
Provide Docket Services XHRecord Administrative Designations
BX
Maintain Tribal & Trust Responsibilities
BX
Consummate NAGPRA DispositionsApprove Cadastral Survey Miles
BJ
Complete Cadastral Field Miles Survey
BK
Collect Digital Cadastral Data [GCDB]
BL
Update Digital Cadastral Data [GCDB]
BM
Prepare Master Title Plats BIProcess Survey Appeals BKCalculate & Disburse Payments
XIRAS - distribution of grazing receipts
Convey Alaska Native Allotments
HM
Patent Alaska Native Corporation Lands
HY
Patent Alaska State Conveyances
HX
Process Land Purchases & Donations
HN
Process Land Exchanges FMExchange Lands or Interests in Lands
HNRIPS - cost recovery for BLM investments and interests
Purchase LWCF Parcels HNDetermine Mining Claim Validity
EY
Process Mineral Patents EYPatent or Deed Townsites or Townsite Lots
EU
Process Land Disposals EUEvaluate ProposalsConduct NEPA ReviewPrepare Vegative Permits & Contracts
EG
Manage Commercial Forests & Woodlands
HL
Manage Helium Storage & Sales
EK
Process Mineral Material Disposals
EP
Sell Materials & Collect Receipts
XI
Gather & Remove Wild Horses & Burros
JJ
Prepare & Hold Wild Horses & Burros
HI
Adopt Wild Horse & Burros HGConduct Wild Horse & Burro Compliance Inspections
NK
Preparation of New RegulationsGrazing Permits/Leases Issued
EERIPS - Assignment of Range Improvements RAS - permits and leases
Process Non-Energy Mineral Licenses, Permits or Leases
EN
Process Cultural & Paleontological Resource Use Permits
FB
Conduct NEPA Review
Grazing Use Authorizations EFRAS - bills and approved non-use
BLM Business Reference Model / Enterprise Model V2 - This model is a BLM-specific function/activity model that is mapped directly to ABC Program Elements that are related directly
to the organization's Missions, Goals and Objectives.
Ser
vice
fo
r C
itiz
ens
Law Enforcement
Homeland SecurityKey Asset and Critical Infrastructure
Protection
Natural Resources
Property Protection
Citizen Protection
Conservation and Land Management
Use Authorizations
Transfers
Sales
Land Title Administration
Cadastral Survey
Information & Records
Environmental Education
Wildland Fire
Research
Implementation
Planning
Assessments
Treatment Evaluation & Projects Maintenance
Public Health & Safety Inspections
Enforcement
Recovery Plans
Landscapes (Watersheds) At-Risk
Hazardous Sites
Abandoned Mine Lands
Monitoring & Evaluation
Energy
Environmental Management
Energy Resource Management
Environmental Monitoring and Forecasting
Environmental Remediation
Energy Use Authorizations
These data collection templates:1) standardize the data collected about
systems, and 2) ensure uniform modeling of the systems
across system groupings.
SystemArchitectureTemplate
FEA Reference ModelTemplates
Page 8
Interior Enterprise Architecture (IEA)
SD
EPA
RTM E
U
M AR CH 3 , 1 8 4 9
TN T HE
INT E
RIO
R
3. Assess Alignment with FEA and DOI Architectures - Process
Sys
tem
A
sses
smen
t
BusinessArchitecture
DataArchitecture
TechnologyArchitecture
ApplicationArchitecture
System’s capability for supporting associated Strategic goals and objectives as defined in DOI Strategic Plan. Extent of stakeholders feedback for accomplishing performance measures associated with strategic goals, objectives and performance measures.Lack of functional overlap with other systems as defined by DOI BRM. System incorporates re-engineered/streamlined business processes (workflow) in an automated fashion that supporting DOI Strategic goals and objectives.
PRM / BRM
DRM SRM / CBA TRM
Existence and documentation of data standards and Protocols Relative maturity and accessibility of system's data storage and access methods Relative overlap with data stored in other Interior systems .
Degree of architectural compliance with the Target Architecture. Extent to which system design requirements are defined and documented Extent to which systems interfaces are defined and documented Extent to which high-level design or operational concepts are defined.
Extent of maximum use of shared, existing infrastructure components and services Extent of compliance with Technology Reference Model standards, protocols and best practices.
The modeling of DOI enterprise architecture elements and their relationship to assessment criteria facilitates “line of sight” analyses. Popkin SA is used to model
the relationship between inputs, outputs, and outcomes. Model queries and analyses support the assessment process
Systems are assessed against established criteria and are then classified
1. Establish Methodology
Modernization Blueprint
2. Determine Scope of
Assessment and Collect Data
3. Assess Alignment With FEA and DOI Architectures
4. Develop Tactical and
Strategic Modernization
Blueprints
Extent to which the system complies
with current Security
requirementsand
extent of progress through the C&A
process.
SecurityArchitecture
Page 9
Interior Enterprise Architecture (IEA)
SD
EPA
RTM E
U
M AR CH 3 , 1 8 4 9
TN T HE
INT E
RIO
R
Well-defined criteria for assessing alignment
Templates for uniform system scoring
The System Grouping Analysis Template – Criteria, Scoring Against Criteria, and Visualization of System Scoring Results
Page 10
Interior Enterprise Architecture (IEA)
SD
EPA
RTM E
U
M AR CH 3 , 1 8 4 9
TN T HE
INT E
RIO
R
The System Grouping Analysis Template – Assessment Quadrants
Migration (Integrate) – Systems with relatively high business fit and relatively low technology fit where it is
cost effective to upgrade the technology architecture/infrastructure to adhere to the TRM and
conceptual TAA.
Target – Systems with relatively high business and technology fit.
Legacy - Systems still required by DOI that
should be considered for integration with other
systems or consolidation with target systems. The
systems being consolidated will
essentially be retired. These systems have
relatively low business (e.g., alignment with DOI
Strategic plan, CRV, CAP, process and data
maturity) and/or technology fit (e.g.,
alignment with TRM, Conceptual TAA, etc.)
Migration (Consolidate/Retire) –
Systems with relatively high technology fit; however, the business fit is
relatively low. These systems should be
examined for possible retirement and/or consolidation
of required functionality and data into Target Systems.
Page 11
Interior Enterprise Architecture (IEA)
SD
EPA
RTM E
U
M AR CH 3 , 1 8 4 9
TN T HE
INT E
RIO
R
4. Develop Tactical and Strategic Modernization Blueprints
DEAR
Modernization blueprints (tactical and strategic modernization recommendations) are produced and should be managed in parallel.
Take-ActionEA
Approach
StrategicModernization
Blueprint
TacticalModernization
Blueprint
Recommendations
RecommendationsDecisions
O&MProject
Management
Decisions
InvestmentProposals/Business
Cases
1. Establish Methodology
Modernization Blueprint
2. Determine Scope of
Assessment and Collect Data
3. Assess Alignment With FEA and DOI Architectures
4. Develop Tactical and
Strategic Modernization
Blueprints
Page 12
Interior Enterprise Architecture (IEA)
SD
EPA
RTM E
U
M AR CH 3 , 1 8 4 9
TN T HE
INT E
RIO
R
Conclusion Structured Enterprise Architecture Process
Phase 1 – Establish vision Phase 2 – Critical to limit scope and constrain data collection Phase 3 – Assess to develop relative scores against Target Phase 4 – Develop recommendations that can be implemented now
and in a coordinated fashion to address the future Addresses Enterprise Architecture both from a top-down
strategic approach and a bottom-up tactical approach Strategic approach makes mission alignment IT recommendations Tactical approach makes systems improvement recommendations
that move systems incrementally toward target architecture and can be implemented with operations and maintenance budget dollars
Business owners prioritize recommendations for implementation consistent with project management governance processes
Recommend this process be used to develop modernization blueprints across the DOI