Interactive Modeling and Visualization in Undergraduate Survey Courses Daniel J. Bramer M. K....
-
Upload
bertha-davidson -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Interactive Modeling and Visualization in Undergraduate Survey Courses Daniel J. Bramer M. K....
Interactive Modeling and Visualization in Undergraduate
Survey Courses
Daniel J. Bramer
M. K. Ramamurthy, R. B. Wilhelmson, and D. P. Wojtowicz
Department of Atmospheric Sciences
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
January 11, 2000
Motivation
Teacher-centered student-centered learning.
Encourage students to become more involved in the learning process – creating a positive learning environment.
Challenge Develop constructivist environments to get the student to not only comprehend the what, where, and when of a topic, but also ask how and why.
January 11, 2000
Interactive Learning Environment
Integrate interactive modeling and visualization tools into curriculum
Permit students to discover relationships on their own
Compel students to ask why Engage both comprehensive and
analytical thought – much like a real scientist Role Playing
January 11, 2000
Why Java & Java3D?
Means to include non-trivial interactive elements
Computations performed on local machine – reducing server demand
Write once, run everywhere Object sharing 3-D visualization environment
January 11, 2000
Java3D
Offers 3D visualization environments to Java programming language
January 11, 2000
Interdisciplinary Example
Ekman Layer Winds Interactive Grasp 3D concepts Model reacts to
input Questions help with
student analysis On the web
http://ww2010.atmos.uiuc.edu/guides/mtr/fw/bndy.rxml (not 3D)
January 11, 2000
Extensions / Activities
Extensions Ocean Pressure gradient force Surface and Geostrophic wind Combined 3D atmosphere/ocean view
Activities Goal-Oriented (instructor / self led) Discovery-Oriented (self discovery)
January 11, 2000
Other Multidisciplinary Examples
Convection Atmosphere Ocean Mantle
Currents Atmosphere Ocean
Land/Sea Breezes Kinetic Gas Theory
Topics general tomultiple ESS
January 11, 2000
Why such topics?
Building Block to many more advanced levels of understanding
Benefits from interactive elements Difficult to explain in static textbook Already being done (Iowa St., U. of
Wisconsin) more needed esp. in lower level ideas
January 11, 2000
Framework / Implementation
Framework Supplement interactive modeling with
curricula and activities Allow students to discover relationships
Implementation Initially on existing framework (WW2010) Ultimately on new framework geared to
allow students to ‘do science’ (Virtual Exploratorium – Pandya et al., 2000)
January 11, 2000
Concluding Remarks
Compelling the student to ask why fosters analytical, more scientific thought
Interactivity enables for learning by doing A consistent framework of content and
inquiries are as important (if not more) than the interactive elements themselves
January 11, 2000
Acknowledgements
This project is funded in part by National Science Foundation Division of
Undergraduate Education Grant #DUE-9972491 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Education Technology Board Grant entitled "Interactive Simulations to Aid Student-Centered Learning in Introductory Courses"