Interaction forces III
Transcript of Interaction forces III
-
8/8/2019 Interaction forces III
1/20
Ron ReifenbergerBirck Nanotechnology Center
Purdue University
Lecture 7Interaction forces III
Tip-sample interaction forces
1
-
8/8/2019 Interaction forces III
2/20
Summary of last lecture
r
Type of interaction
Ion-ion electrostatic
Dipole-charge electrostatic
Dipole-dipole electrostatic
Angle-averaged electrostatic (Keesom force)
Angle-averaged induced polarization force (Debye force)
Dispersion forces act between any two molecules or atoms(London force)
Q1 Q2rp Q
r
p1r1
p2 2
1 2
0
( )
4
Q QU r
r
=
p1r
p2
=
2
0
cos( )( )
4
QpU r
r
[ ]
=
1 2 1 2 1 2
30
2cos( )cos( ) sin( )sin( )cos( )
( ) 4
p pU r
r
( )=
2 2
1 22 6
0
1( )
3 4Keesom
B
p pU r
rk T
p1r
p2
0
12 21 02 2 01Debye 2 6
p +pU (r)= -
(4 ) r
01 02 1 2
2 6
0 1 2
( )( )3 1( )
2 (4 )London
I IU r
I I r
=
+
Adapted from J. Israelachvilli, Intermolecular and surface forces.2
-
8/8/2019 Interaction forces III
3/20
From interatomic to tip-sample interactions-simple theoryFirst consider the net interaction between an isolated atom/molecule and a flatsurface.
Relevant separation distance will now be called d.Assume that the pair potential between the atom/molecule and an atom on thesurface is given by U(r)=-C/rn.
Assume additivity, that is the net interaction force will be the sum of its inter-actions with all molecules in the body are surfaces atoms different than bulkatoms?
No. of atoms/molecules in the infinitesimal ring is dV= (2x dx d) where isthe number density of molecules/atoms in the surface.
=0
d
x
=d
dx
( )
= =
= =
=
+
= >
= =
2 20
3
3
( ) 2
2, 3
( 2)( 3)
, 66
x
n
d x
n
VdW
dxU d C d
x
Cfor n
n n d
CU for n d
3
-
8/8/2019 Interaction forces III
4/20
Number Densities of the Elements
Introduction to Solid State Physics, 5th Ed. C. Kittel, pg. 32 4
-
8/8/2019 Interaction forces III
5/20
From interatomic to tip-sample interactions-simple theory
Next integrate atom-plane interaction over the volume of all atoms in the AFMtip. Number of atoms/molecules contained within the slice shown below is
x2 d = [R2-(R-)2] d = (2Rtip-) d.
Since all these are at the same equal distance d+ from the plane, the net interaction energy can be derived by using the result on the previous slide.
=
=
=
=
=
-
8/8/2019 Interaction forces III
6/20
From interatomic to tip-sample interactions-some caveats
If tip and sample are made of different materials replace2 by 12 etc.
Tip is assumed to be homogeneous sample also! Bothmade of simple atoms/molecules
Assumes atom-atom interactions are independent ofpresence of other surrounding atoms
Perfectly smooth interacting surfaces
Tip-surface interactions obey very different power laws
compared to atom-atom laws
6
-
8/8/2019 Interaction forces III
7/20
Measuring Macroscopic Surface Forces
An interface is the boundary region between two adjacent bulk phases
We call (S/G), (S/L), and (L/V) surfacesWe call (S/S) and (L/L) interfaces
LL
V
GS
S
L
L
L = LiquidG = GasS = SolidV = Vapor
SS
7
-
8/8/2019 Interaction forces III
8/20
Surface Energetics
Atoms (or molecules) in the bulk of a material have a low relative energydue to nearest neighbor interactions (e.g. bonding).
Performing work on the system to create an interface can disrupt thissituation...
8
-
8/8/2019 Interaction forces III
9/20
Atoms (or molecules) at an interface are in a state of higher free energythan those in the bulk due to the lack of nearest neighbor interactions.
(Excess) Surface Free Energy
interface
9
-
8/8/2019 Interaction forces III
10/20
Surface Energy
The work (dW) to create a new surface of area dA is proportional to
the number of atoms/molecules at the surface and must thereforebe proportional to the surface area (dA):
is the proportionality constant defined as the specific surface freeenergy. It is a scalar quantity and has units of energy/unit area, mJ/m2.
acts as a restoring force to resist any increase in area. For liquids is numerically equal to the surface tension which is a vector and has
units of force/unit length, mN/m.Surface tension acts to decrease the free energy of the system andleads to some well-known effects like liquid droplets forming spheresand meniscus effects in small capillaries.
dW dA=
10
-
8/8/2019 Interaction forces III
11/20
high surface energy strong cohesion high melting temperatures
Material Surface energy ( mJ/m2 )
mica 4500
gold 1000
mercury 487
water 73
benzene 29
methanol 23
Materials with high surface energiestend to rapidly adsorb contaminants
Values depend on oxide contamination adsorbed contaminants surface roughness etc.
11
-
8/8/2019 Interaction forces III
12/20
-
8/8/2019 Interaction forces III
13/20
Surface-surface interactionsFollowing the steps in previous slides it is possible calculate the inter-action energy of two planar surfaces a distance of d apart, specificallydV = dA d for the unit area of one surface (dA=1) interacting with
an infinite area of the other.
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
2
3
2
4
2
2
2 2
2
2( )
( 2)( 3) ( )
2 1
( 2)( 3)( 4)
6
( ) ( )
( )12
ker
1( )
12
n
d
n
plane plane
H
Hplane plane
C dU d
n n
C
n n n d
For n
U d U d
Cper unit aread
A Hama constant C
AU d per unit area
d
=d
=0
unit area
d
13
-
8/8/2019 Interaction forces III
14/20
Typical Values for Hamaker Constant
Typically, for solids interacting across a vacuum,C 10-77 Jm6 and 3x1028 m-3
( )2
2 77 6 28 3
19
10 3 10
10
H A J m m
J
Typically, most solids have
19
(0.4 4.0) 10HA J
14
See Butt, Cappella, Kappl, Surf. Sci. Reps., 59, 50 (2005) for more complete list
-
8/8/2019 Interaction forces III
15/20
15
Implications
Positive energy
Repulsive force
Negative energyAttractive force
U or F
U (r)
Flocal maxUmin
r*=
r=
( )( )
dU rF r
dr
r=
1612 13
1.246 7
= rF=max=
1612
1.126
=
=
12 6
( ) 4 *oU r Ur r
atom-atominteraction
15
Equilibrium
separation
-
8/8/2019 Interaction forces III
16/20
I l dW i i b
-
8/8/2019 Interaction forces III
17/20
In general, vdW interactions betweenmacroscopic objects depends on geometry
Source J. Israelachvilli, Intermolecular and surface forces. 17
-
8/8/2019 Interaction forces III
18/20
The Derjaguin approximation
Plane-plane interaction energies are fundamental quantities andit is important to correlate tip-sample force to known values of
surface interaction energies. For a sphere-plane interaction wesaw that
=
= =
2 2
5
2 2
4
4 1( )
( 2)( 3)( 4)( 5)
4 1( )( ) ( 2)( 3)( 4)
tip
n
tipn
C RU d
n n n n d
C RdUF dd d n n n d
=( ) 2 ( )sphere plane tip plane plane F d R U d
= + 1 2
1 2
( ) 2 ( )sphere sphere plane plane R R
F d U d R R
It can be shown that for two interacting sphere of different radii
Comparing with previous slides we find that
18
-
8/8/2019 Interaction forces III
19/20
Implications of Derjaguins approximation
We showed this when U(r)=-C/rn - however it is valid forany force law - attractive or repulsive or oscillatory - fortwo rigid spheres.
As mentioned before, if two spheres are in contact(assuming no contamination), then d=r*.
The value of U(d=r*)plane-plane
is basically dW11
theconventional surface energy per unit area to create asolid surface. Thus:
This approximation is useful because it converts measuredFadhesion in AFM experiments to surface energy dW11
= = = +
1
1 2
1 1( *) 2 ( *)adhesion sphere sphere plane plane F F d r U d r
R R
dW11
19
-
8/8/2019 Interaction forces III
20/20
How to Model the Repulsive Interactionat Contact?
20
tip
apex
substrate
Source: Capella & Dietler
Maybe if the contact area involves tens or hundredsof atoms the description of net repulsive forceis best captured by continuum elasticity models
Atom-Atom? Sphere-Plane?
20