INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

74
LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011

Transcript of INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Page 1: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

INTENSIVE LEVEL

SYSTEMS, DATA &

PRACTICESAdministrative Planning/OverviewMay 5, 2011

Page 2: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

SETTING THE CONTEXT FOR VTPBIS

AT THE INTENSIVE LEVEL

This is a “work in progress”

Page 3: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Today’s Agenda and Objectives:• Review PBIS within the context of RtI• Review and inventory targeted level practices• Understand the role of Universal Screening• Identify Intensive level practices• School/SU Wraparound presentation• Explore systems needed at the Intensive Level

• Identify data tools needed at Intensive Level• Plan for Summer Institute and Next Steps

Page 4: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Tier 3/Tertiary Interventions 1-5%•Individual students•Assessment-based•High intensity

1-5% Tier 3/Tertiary Interventions•Individual students•Assessment-based•Intense, durable procedures

Tier 2/Secondary Interventions 5-15%•Some students (at-risk)•High efficiency•Rapid response•Small group interventions• Some individualizing

5-15% Tier 2/Secondary Interventions•Some students (at-risk)•High efficiency•Rapid response•Small group interventions•Some individualizing

Tier 1/Universal Interventions 80-90%•All students•Preventive, proactive

80-90% Tier 1/Universal Interventions•All settings, all students•Preventive, proactive

School-Wide Systems for Student Success:A Response to Intervention (RtI) ModelAcademic Systems Behavioral Systems

Illinois PBIS Network, Revised May 15, 2008. Adapted from “What is school-wide PBS?” OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports.

Accessed at http://pbis.org/schoolwide.htm

Page 5: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Core Features of Response to Intervention (RtI) Approach• Investment in prevention• Universal Screening• Early intervention for students needing targeted supports

• Multi-tiered, prevention-based intervention approach

• Progress monitoring• Use of problem-solving process at all 3-tiers• Active use of data for decision-making at all 3-tiers• Research-based practices expected at all 3-tiers• Individualized interventions matched with assessed level of need

Page 6: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Tier 1/Universal School-Wide Assessment

School-Wide Prevention Systems

Tools like Simeo and ISIS:

Check-in/ Check-out

Individualized Check-In/Check-Out, Groups & Mentoring (ex. CnC)

Brief Functional Behavioral Assessment/Behavior Intervention Planning (FBA/BIP)

Complex FBA/BIP

Wraparound

ODRs, Attendance, Tardies, Grades, DIBELS, etc.

Daily Progress Report (DPR) (Behavior and Academic Goals)

Competing Behavior Pathway, Functional Assessment Interview, Scatter Plots, etc.

Social/Academic Instructional Groups

Illinois PBIS Network, Revised Aug.,2009Adapted from T. Scott, 2004

Tier 2/Targeted

Tier 3/Intensive

Pra

ctic

esData

Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports:A Response to Intervention (RtI) Model

Page 7: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Systems

SupportingStaff Behavior

Practices

Supporting Student Behavior

OUTCOMES

Outcomes

SupportingDecision Making

Page 8: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Continuum of Support at Targeted/Intensive Level Systems• Small group interventions: Check-in Check-Out (CICO),

social/academic instructional groups, tutor/homework clubs, etc.

• Group interventions with individualized focus: Utilizing a unique feature for an individual student, e.g. CICO individualized into a Check & Connect, mentoring/tutoring, etc.

• Simple individual interventions: A simple individualized function-based behavior support plan for a student focused on one specific behavior, e.g. brief FBA/BIP-one behavior; curriculum adjustment; schedule or other environmental adjustments, etc.

• Multiple-domain FBA/BIP: A complex function-based behavior support plan across settings, e.g. FBA/BIP home and school and/or community

• Wraparound: A more comprehensive plan that addresses multiple life domain issues across home, school and community, e.g. basic needs, MH treatment, behavior/academic interventions, as well as multiple behaviorsIllinois PBIS Network, Revised Sept., 2008

Page 9: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

TARGETED INTERVENTIONS

Descriptions and Examples…

Page 10: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Critical Features of Targeted (Group) Interventions• Intervention is continuously available• Rapid access to intervention (72 hr.)• Very low effort by teachers• Consistent with school-wide expectations• All staff/faculty in school are involved/have access

• Flexible intervention based on descriptive functional assessment

• Adequate resources (admin., team)• Continuous monitoring for decision-making

Page 11: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Why do Targeted Interventions Work?• Improved structure• Increased feedback• Inappropriate behavior is less likely to be ignored or rewarded

• Linking school and home support• Organized to morph into a self-management system

Page 12: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Check-In/Check-Out (CICO)

Default intervention. WHY?•Most students receive multiple ODRs for peer or adult attention.•Evidence indicates CICO is effective practice for reducing acting out behavior related to attention seeking.

Schools must have strong CICO in place! See CICO Self-Assessment and Action Plan.

Page 13: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Social Skills Training

• Social Skills Training is the process of teaching pro- social concepts needed to be successful in social environments across all settings.

• While social skills training is part of all levels of PBIS, it becomes more individualized as students needs indicate.

• Social Skills are not based on a “problem” but perhaps a “deficit”.

• Social skills training involves modeling, teaching, practicing and feedback.

Page 14: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.
Page 15: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Self-Management• Self-Management helps the child become aware of his or her own activity level in order to produce an automatic response without relying on external reinforcement or prompting.

Page 16: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Problem Solving Training

• Problem solving teaches students a sequential and deliberate process for handling difficult situations.

• The steps to problem solving can be used after a problem occurs; yet ideally training occurs once a day/wk, etc. with different teacher generated scenarios to teach the steps to the student.

Page 17: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Life Space Crisis Intervention• De-Escalation Skills

• Establishing effective positive helping relationships with children

• Diagnosing and breaking self defeating patterns of behavior

Page 18: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Other Types of Targeted Interventions • Newcomers Club• Homework Study Groups• Lunch Bunch• Bus Riders School• Anger Management Group

Others? Please share!

Page 19: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

FUNDAMENTAL RULE!“You should not propose to reduce a problem behavior without also identifying alternative, desired behaviors person should perform instead of problem behavior” (O’ Neill et al., 1997, p. 71).

Page 20: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Inventory of Existing Targeted Interventions

Page 21: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.
Page 22: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

ACTIVITY # 1

Complete the CICO Self-Assessment and Action Plan

Begin the Inventory of Targeted Interventions

Page 23: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

UNIVERSAL SCREENING

Page 24: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Problems at Schools• Struggling readers• Can’t read at all• Letter/word reversal• Comprehension difficulties• Memorization difficulties• Retention problems• English language learners• Lack of number recognition• Math fact deficits• Homework completion• Sloppy work• Test anxiety• Oral reading fluency• Poor writing skills

• Fights• Property destruction• Weapons violation• Violence toward teachers• Tobacco use• Drug use• Alcohol use• Insubordination• Noncompliance• Late to class• Truancy• Inappropriate language• Harassment• Trespassing• Vandalism• Verbal abuse

Page 25: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Interventions with an Evidence Base

Vannest K, Reynolds CR, Kamphaus RW. BASC-2 intervention guide for emotional and behavioral problems. Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments; 2009.

Page 26: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Consider Universal Screening

Why Screen for Behavior? Kauffman (2001)

• To find students whose problems are not immediately obvious (internalizers) and identify problems with a high degree of accuracy.

• Early identification leads to early intervention

• Schools that implement Universal Screening select interventions based on results of rating scales on the screening tools. This is effective and efficient.

Page 27: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Universally Accepted Types of Screening in School

Why not?

Page 28: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Multi-Tier Screening

Page 29: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Results of screens helped teams choose which interventions to develop, use, or expand (4 schools)

Page 30: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

We will focus on Universal

Screening at the Summer

Institute

Page 31: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

INTENSIVE LEVEL INTERVENTIONS

Descriptions and Examples…

Page 32: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Functional Behavioral Assessment / Behavior Intervention Program (FBA/BIP)

• Foundation of all intensive level interventions

• Behavior support is the redesign of environments, not the redesign of individuals.

• Positive behavior support plans define changes in the behavior of those who will implement the plan. A behavior support plan describes what we will do differently.

Page 33: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

FBA “BIG IDEAS”• FBA is a problem solving process – a way to think about behavior systematically.

“FBA can be done in your head.”• FBA identifies the events that reliably predict and maintain problem behavior.

Page 34: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Levels of FBA (Crone & Horner, 2003)

Page 35: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

FBA Team Process Steps1. Collect information

a. What does the problem look like?b. What series of events predicts behavior?c. What is the maintaining consequence of the

observable behavior?d. Hypothesis statement?

2. Develop “competing pathways” and replacement behaviors

3. Develop BIP.4. Develop strategies for monitoring &

evaluating implementation of BIP.

Page 36: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

FBA/BIP

• Best conducted by teams of educators who are skilled in the process

• The persons who implement the strategy need to be actively involved in designing it or it probably won’t work!

Page 37: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

We will focus on

FBA/BIP skill building at

the Summer Institute

Page 38: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Individualized Teams at the Intensive Level• Are unique to an individual child & family• Task facilitator with engaging family and bringing team together

• Blend the family’s supports with the school representatives who know the child best

• Designed to improve quality of life as defined by the youth/family (i.e., “BIG Needs”)

• Meet frequently • Identify, develop & review interventions

Page 39: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Who Benefits from Intensive Supports?•Youth with needs across home, school, & community

• Youth with needs in multiple life domains

• The adults in youth’s life who are not effectively engaged in comprehensive planning

Page 40: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

What is Wraparound? • Wraparound is a family-driven, team-based process for planning and implementing services and supports.

• Teams create plans that are geared toward meeting the unique needs & strengths of children and youth with complex needs and their families.

• The wraparound team members meet regularly to implement and monitor the plan to ensure its success.

Page 41: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Wraparound Principles

Page 42: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Four Phases of Wraparound

Page 43: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Context for VTPBiS Intensive Level - Wraparound

Page 44: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Targeted/Intensive Level Skill Sets • Understands the conflict cycle and uses de-escalation strategies

• Develops FBAs and BIPs• Uses effective engagement strategies with students, families and teams

• Develops targeted interventions that are function-based.

• Familiar with academic modifications and accommodations

• Integrates data-based decision-making into comprehensive processes (home-school-community)

Page 45: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

We will focus on

wraparound at the

Summer Institute

Page 46: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Outcomes

SupportingDecision Making

Systems

SupportingStaff Behavior

Practices

Supporting Student Behavior

OUTCOMES

Page 47: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.
Page 48: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Focus at the Supervisory Union/District Level • Build capacity to implement effective practices

• Focus on student outcomes• Focus on fidelity of implementation of effective practices.

• Avoid doing too many different things at one time

• Stages of implementation• Alignment of district practices

Page 49: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Stages of Implementation

Implementation occurs in stages

Fixsen, Naoom, Blase, Friedman, & Wallace, 2005

2-4 years

Page 50: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Focus of Supervisory Union/District:Intensive Level System Components at Installation Stage

1. SU/District Planning Team to assure efficient and effective allocation of resources to meet the needs of students with most complex needs.

2. Building based intensive level (systems) planning team to monitor progress of intensive plans and address challenges at building level.

3. Coaching from supervisory union and state level coaches.

4. Facilitators identified and “positioned” to facilitate teams and plans for 1-5% of students.

5. Comprehensive training and technical assistance plan.

6. Data system/tools to be integrated into practices.

Page 51: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Focus of Supervisory Union/District at Sustainability Stage (in 3-5 years):

1. Representative SU/District Leadership Team mtg. with integrated Intensive level focus regularly

2. SU Coach/es app. 1 FTE (fully funded)3. All buildings with at least monthly Targeted

Systems, Intensive Systems & Student Problem Solving Team mtgs.

4. All buildings with 1-3 % of students with 2 or more data points

5. Modified district/SU policies/procedures6. Specific strategies for blending related

initiatives

Page 52: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Tools for Guiding Your District/Supervisory Union Plan

School Action Plan SU/District Action Plan VTPBiS Intensive Level Readiness Checklist

Where/how will Community Partners/Resources, including family voice,

be integrated into the overall district and in school buildings?

Page 53: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Why We Need MH Partnerships• One in 5 youth have a MH “condition”• About 70% of those get no treatment• School is “defacto” MH provider• Students with EBD are 2 to 4 grade levels behind in academics.

• Best predictor of delinquency and incarceration

• Suicide is 4th leading cause of death among young adults

Page 54: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Old Approach New Approach• Each school works out their own plan with Mental Health (MH) agency;

• A MH counselor is housed in a school building 1 day a week to “see” students;

• No data to decide on or monitor interventions;

• “Hoping” that interventions are working; but not sure.

• District has a plan for integrating MH at all buildings (based on community data as well as school data);

• MH person participates in teams at all 3 levels;

• MH person leads small groups based on data;

• MH person co-facilitates FBA/BIP or wrap individual teams for students.

Page 55: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.
Page 56: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

ACTIVITY # 2:Review VTPBiS Readiness Checklist “What the Supervisory Union or District Commits to”

Create an action plan for moving to Readiness at the Intensive Level.

Page 57: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

SCHOOL SYSTEM STRUCTURES NEEDED

Page 58: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Examples of Ineffective Targeted/Intensive System Structures• Referrals to Special Education seen as the “intervention”

• FBA seen as required “paperwork” vs. a needed part of designing an intervention

• Interventions the system is familiar with vs. ones likely to produce an effect • Example: Student sent for insight based counseling at point of misbehavior

Page 59: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Lessons Learned• Targeted Interventions need to be strong in order to build Intensive level supports

• PBIS Intensive level interventions require system of support at both the school and SU/District.

• Implementation of new interventions (innovations) requires changes in system structures.

• Success at any level of the pyramid is dependent on fidelity of implementation at all levels of the pyramid.

Page 60: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Three Tiered System of Support Necessary Conversations (Teams)

School-wide & Classroom Practices

Office Disciplinary Referrals (ODRs)

AcademicGrades

Attendance

INTENSIVE Systems Planning

Brief FBA/BIPTCCESmall

GroupsCheck in

Check Out

Brief FBA Form

Process dataDaily

Progress Reports (DPRs)

WrapFBA /

BIP

HSCWIT

FBA

Practices Data

TARGETED

Systems Planning

UNIVERSAL

Systems Planning

INTENSIVE &

TARGETEDStudent Planning

INTENSIVE &

TARGETEDStudent Planning

Page 61: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Administrators Need to…• Know what the practices look like when implemented with fidelity;

• Be active/visible on teams;• Be “hands on” with the first few intensive level plans;

• Apply high-level problem-solving skills troubleshooting systems level issues.

Page 62: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.
Page 63: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

ACTIVITY # 3:Review VTPBiS Readiness Checklist – “Schools are ready to engage at the PBIS Intensive Level once they have:...”

Create an action plan for moving to school Readiness at the Intensive Level.

Page 64: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Systems

SupportingStaff Behavior

Practices

Supporting Student Behavior

OUTCOMES

Data/Outcomes

SupportingDecision Making

Page 65: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Types of Data• Individual students

• Tools for data collection• Tools for easy graphing and evaluation• Teachers receive feedback regularly• Parents receive feedback regularly

• Effects of system monitored • Outcomes• Fidelity• Social validity

Page 66: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Student data examples

• Home, School, Community Tool (HSCT)

• Educational Information Tool (EIT)

• Grades, Tardies, Suspensions, Other

Page 67: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Home, School, Community Tool

Page 68: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Educational Information Tool

Page 69: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Other Student Data

Page 70: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Systems Data Tools to Build SU/District and Building Level Action Plans for Targeted/Intensive Implementation

• IL PBIS Secondary/Tertiary Tracking Tool• IL PBIS Systems Response Tool• VTPBIS Phases of Implementation (PoI)

Page 71: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Many More Tools Available

Student•Wraparound Integrity Tool (i.e., fidelity)•Student Disposition Tool (i.e., basic student info)•Family & Youth Satisfaction Tools

System•Benchmarks of Advanced Tiers

Page 72: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

ACTIVITY # 4At your table, review the systems tools and individual student tools.

Be prepared to comment on how your team might benefit from using these tools

Page 73: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Moving Forward with PBIS Intensive Level Supports

Next steps…•Complete: Inventory of Targeted Interventions and

•Complete: CICO Self-Assessment and Action Plan

•Determine follow-up activities for your District/SU in order to complete the VTPBiS Intensive Level Readiness Checklist

Page 74: INTENSIVE LEVEL SYSTEMS, DATA & PRACTICES Administrative Planning/Overview May 5, 2011.

Prepare for Summer Institute

• Discuss learning objectives as large group

• Participants should bring:• A FBA or Competing Behavior Pathway that has been started or completed for a student

• Progress-monitoring data for 1-3 students who seem to need more than FBA/BIP and/or students whose home/school/community placement is at risk. Bring Check-in/Check-out data for these students, if applicable.