Intensity Variations in X-ray Powder Data

Diffraction Basics, Part 2 (prepared by James R. Connolly, for EPS400-002, Introduction to X-Ray Powder Diffraction, Spring 2005)

Introduction The material in the previous section is concerned primarily with the origin of diffraction peaks and the application of the reciprocal lattice to the interpretation of peak positions. This section is concerned primarily with the other aspect of X-ray diffraction data – the intensity of the diffraction peaks and how variations in those intensities are related to the chemistry and atomic arrangement or crystal structure of the analyzed material. This section concludes the basic theory of X-ray diffraction. Although the balance of the course will be concerned with use of the powder diffractometer to acquire and interpret experimental data, the theory is an essential element of successful practical application.

Material in this section is taken from a variety of sources, primarily Jenkins and Snyder (1996) and Nuffield (1966), supplemented by notes from a short course on powder diffraction taken by the author at the International Center for Diffraction Data (ICDD) during the summer of 2002.

Intensity Variations in X-ray Powder Data

Overview The position of diffraction peaks and the d-spacings that they represent provide information about the location of lattice planes in the crystal structure. Each peak measures a d-spacing that represents a family of lattice planes. Each peak also has an intensity which differs from other peaks in the pattern and reflects the relative strength of the diffraction. In a diffraction pattern, the strongest peak is, by convention, assigned an intensity value of 100, and other peaks are scaled relative to that value. Although peak height may be used as a qualitative measure of relative intensity, the most accurate measure of intensity relationships in a pattern is to measure the area (minus background) under the peaks.

Variations in measured intensity are related chiefly to variations in the scattering intensity of the components of the crystal structure – the atoms, molecules – and their arrangement in the lattice. Some of the most dramatic variations are related to interference between diffractions produced in the lattice; these can produce systematic extinctions or greatly reduced intensities of peaks from certain lattice planes.

Scattering In diffraction, we are concerned with coherent scattering, that is, the scattering in which the incident X-rays interact with a target atom, exciting it and causing it to be a secondary point source of X-rays of the same energy (wavelength). The intensity of that scattering is the result of a variety of processes the sum of which results in scattering which “looks” like it comes from the atom as a whole.

Scattering by an Electron An electron will oscillate in phase with an x-ray beam according to the following equation (called the Thompson equation after J.J. Thompson who demonstrated the relationship in 1906):

(Material in this document is borrowed from many sources; all original material is ©2005 by James R. Connolly)

(Revision date: 27-Feb-05) of 12


2)2(cos1 22

2

2

2

θ+⎥⎦

⎤⎢⎣

⎡=

cme

rI

Ie

O

where I0 is the intensity of the incident beam; e the charge on the electron; me the mass of the electron; c the speed of light; and r the distance from the scattering electron to the detector (with the r2 term in the denominator expressing the inverse square law). Clearly (by the second term) the scattered energy from a single electron is quite low. Third term, involving the cosine function, is called the polarization factor because it indicates that the incoming non-polarized x-ray is polarized by the scattering process, resulting in a directional variation in the scattered intensity.

Scattering by an Atom Scattering by an atom is essentially the sum of the scattering of the electron “cloud” around

the nucleus.

The process is illustrated in the simplified diagram at left (Fig. 3.12 from Jenkins and Snyder, 1996). Scattering from each electron follows the Thompson equation. Because of the distance between electrons scattering within the atom and the fact that the x-ray wavelength is of the same order as the atomic dimensions, there will be path differences between the scattered waves. These differences will always be less than one wavelength, so the interference will always be partially destructive.

This phenomenon is called the nction is normalized in un

the amount of scattering occurring from a single electron in the Thompson equation. At zero degrees, f

atomic scattering factor, described by the quantity f0. This fu its of

nd λ

integrating scattering over the electron

bles as a re

0 will be equal to the number of electrons surrounding the atom or ion. At higher scattering angles, the factor will be less. f0 is generally expressed as a function of sinθ aas shown below for Cu (Fig. 3.13 from Jenkins and Snyder, 1996).

The actual shape of the f0 function is calculated by

distribution around an atom. These calculations involve very complex quantum approximation methods and have been compiled in the International Tables for Crystallography (Vol. 3). Atomic scattering factors are usually given either in tafunction of (sinθ)/λ or as coefficients of polynomials fit to curves like those shown in Figu3.15 (from Nuffield, 1966).




Anomalous

cattering

-t

”

ngth

n

sible for reduction of diffracted intensity for es

o ents with

nce

Scattering

Anomalous sor anomalous dispersion occurs when the incident xray energy is sufficiento cause photoelectric x-ray production in a target atom. The process is called fluorescence. Thisphenomenon is responsible for “absorption edgephenomenon that occurs with certain elements when interacting with particular wavelex-rays. In this process a characteristic x-ray photon is produced in the target; subsequent interaction produces coherent x-rays which et result is a reduction

of the scattered intensity from the element.

This “absorption edge” phenomenon is respon

are slightly out of phase with other coherently scattered x-rays. The

materials containing certain elements. The table below lists the common x-ray source anodand the elements for which this absorption effect occurs.

Target (Anode) λ of Kα1 in ElemElement Angstr ms strong fluoresceCr 2.2909 Ti, Sc, Ca

Fe 1.9373 Cr, V, Ti

Co 1.7902 Mn, Cr, V

Cu 1.5418 Co, Fe, Mn

Mo 0.7107 Y, Sr, Rb

Quantitatively, t lculation of the on to f0 involves a real (∆f’) and imaginary he ca correcti(∆f’’) term. The effective scattering will be:

220

2 ( ff ∆+= )() ff ′′∆+′




Values for the coefficients are tabulated in the International Tables for Crystallography. In actual practice, these corrections are only significant for those elements for which absorption

onal amplitude of the atom will have an effect on x-ray scattering. The is described by the following relationship:

edge fluorescence effects are significant.

Thermal Motion The thermal vibratieffective scattering

⎥⎤

⎢⎡−= 2

2

0sinexp θBff

⎦⎣ λ

B is the Debye-Waller temperature factor and is defined as: . U2 is the mean-square amplitude of vibration of an atom, and is directly related to the thermal energy (kT)

in

228 UB π=

available with other terms related to atomic mass and the strength of interatomic bonds. Qualitatively, as T increases (other factors constant), B will increase. When B = 0, the scattering will follow the Thompson equation. As B increases, scattering will be reducedamplitude. This relationship is shown in Fig 3.14 (Jenkins and Snyder, 1996) below:

Unlike other scattering factors, the computation of the temperature factor is extremely complex, based on tensor relationships on which there is not widespread general agreement.

ifferent elements whose oint group symmetry

ks are.

Intensity, on the other hand, is definitely related to the composition because the intensity of

Scattering of X-Rays by a Unit Cell: The Structure Factor The unit cells of most crystalline substances contain a several datoms are arranged in a complex motif defined by a variety of pelements and replicated by translational elements into a three-dimensional lattice array.

The structure may be thought of as repeating planar arrays of atoms. The geometry of peais related fundamentally to positions of those atoms with little regard to what those atoms




scattering is related to atomic scattering. The structure factor is a means of grouping the atoms in the unit cell into planar elements, developing the diffraction intensities from each of those elements and integrating the results into the total diffraction intensity from each dhkl plane in the structure.

We can define F(hkl) as the structure factor for the (hkl) plane. A particular (hkl) plane is the result of reflections from a series of parallel atomic planes where f1, f2, f3, etc. are the amplitudes of the respective atomic planes. The phase factors (φ ) are the repeat distances Nbetween the atomic planes measured from a common origin. The general expression for the structure factor for a (hkl) is:

),()( NNNfhklF φΣ=

where fN is the f value of the Nth kind of atom in the cell, and φN is its phase factor. This relationship is most easily visualized as an addition of vectors as shown in the diagram below (Fig. 3-16 from Nuffield, 1966).

and R are arranged in a

vectors. Though the

sor

l to

ation of

or any other text on x-ray

In this diagram, three different atoms, P, Q

reader is referred to Nuffield (1966), Jenkins and Snyder (1996)diffraction.

two-dimensional latticerepeating at interval dhkl(Fig. 3-16a). Nuffield presents the structure factor in slightly different terms as shownby the expressions for φP, φQ, and φR.

F(hkl) is shown as the sum of the component

mathematics of the actual calculations in three dimensions involve complex tenoperations, it is conceptually usefuunderstand the structure factor as a summdirectional vectors.

For a more rigorous treatment of the structure factor, the




Extinction In certain lattice types, the arrangement and spacing of lattice planes produces diffractions

classes of planes in the structure that are always exactly 180° out of phase

from certainproducing a phenomenon called extinction. In these cases, certain classes of reflections fromvalid lattice planes will not produce visible diffractions. For example, for a body-centeredcubic cell, for each atom located at x, y, z there will be an identical atom located at x+½, y+½, z+½. The structure factor Fhkl is represented by the following equation.

[ ] ⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛ ⎤⎢⎣⎡ +++++⎟⎟

⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛++= ∑Σ

== 22(2exp(2exp

2/2/

1

llzkkyhhxiflzkyhxif jj

m

njjjn

m

jhkl ππF ⎥⎦

+21

jn

While complicated, it is noted that if h + k + l is even, then the second term will contain an integer, n, in it. An integral number of 2π’s will have no effect on the value of this term and the equation reduces to:

[ ]m

lzkyhxif ++= Σ (2exp22/

πF jjjnj

hkl=1

If h + k + l is odd, however, the second term will contain an integer with a 2π(n/2) term; here n is any integer and represents a full rotation of the scattering vector. This causes the second term to be negative, and the net result is there is no diffracted intensity (since Fhkl = 0). This condition is called a systematic extinction. The table below lists the systematic extinction conditions due to translational symmetry elements1:

Symmetry Extinction Conditions

P none

C hkl; h + k = odd

B hkl; h + l = odd

A hkl; k + l = odd

I hkl; h + k + l = odd

F hkl; h, k, l mixed even and odd

21 b ║ 0k0: k = odd

b⊥c h0l: l = odd

Other systematic extincti occ uence of rotational operations (screw axes and glide planes).

d to systematic lattice parameters; these are not easily predictable and are called accidental extinction.

ons can ur as a conseq

Extinctions can also be caused by atomic scattering vectors that happen to cancel each other out and are not relate

1 P = primitive lattice; C, B, A = side-centered on c-, b-, a-face; I = body centered; F = face centered (001)




Summary of Factors Affecting Relative Intensity of Bragg Reflections By considering all of the factors affecting the relative intensity diffractions produced by the lattice planes of a crystal structure, it is possible to calculate a theoretical diffraction pattern

d actor will always

tems, a single family of planes may be duplicated many times ch “duplicate” will add to the intensity of the diffraction. As

for virtually any crystalline material. The ICDD database contains over 40,000 patterns calculated based on these factors, and the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) includes the calculated patterns and all of the detailed crystal structure data used as a base fordetailed pattern refinements done on experimental data. We will not actually do these calculations, but it is important to be aware of these factors when you interpret your data.The factors are summarized in the following sections.

Multiplicity of Bragg Planes The number of identically spaced planes cutting a unit cell in a particular hkl family is callethe plane multiplicity factor. For low symmetry systems, the multiplicity fbe low. For high symmetry sysby symmetry operations, and eaan example, each cubic crystal face has a diagonal (110) and an equivalent )101( plane. With six faces, there are 12 crystallographic orientations. The (100) will similarly have 6 orientations. Thus, the (110) family will have twice the intensity of the (100) family because of the multiplicity factor.

Multiplicity factors for the various crystal classes and planes are given in Table 3.3 (from Jenkins and Snyder, 1996) below:

The Lorentz Factor When each lattice point on the reciprocal lattice intersects the diffractometer circle, a diffraction related to the plane represented will occur. The diffractometer typically moves at

amount of time each point is in the diffracting condition will be a As angles increase, the intersection approaches a tangent to

ay be

ccur which is related to a phase-shifted reflection which can occur from the underside of very strongly reflecting planes. Directed towards the incident beam but

a constant 2θ rate, thefunction of the diffraction angle. the circle; thus at higher angles, more time is spent in the diffracting condition. This mcorrected by inserting the term I/(sin2θ cosθ) into the expression for calculating diffraction intensities; this is called the Lorentz factor. In practice, this is usually combined with theatomic scattering polarization term (Thompson equation) and called the Lorentz polarization (Lp) correction.

Extinction In addition to systematic extinctions related to crystal structure, another extinction phenomenon can o




always 180° out of phase with it, the net effect is to reduce the intensity of the incident beam,

t by thermally shocking the this

eam into the specimen. In general, with a Bragg-Brentano diffractometer, the sample irradiated at low 2θ values have less depth of penetration. At higher 2θ

ese

ls preferentially interact with the beam causing orption and intensities not representative of the proportions of the phases.

to on angle of the monochromator (θm) is added to the (Lp) correction. It should be

PG) monochromators, the curved crystal geometry tends to

nd is done regularly to produce the “calculated Diffraction File database. This section is directly extracted

and secondarily the intensity of the diffraction from that plane.

A similar phenomenon will reduce the penetration of the beam into strongly diffracting planes by reducing the primary beam energy which is redirected into the diffracted beam.

Corrections have been devised that require knowledge of the diffraction domain size, but this is very difficult to ascertain. Usually attempts to reduce this effecsample, inducing strains that reduce or eliminate the effect. The simplest way to reduce effect is to make sure that particle size is uniformly fine. The effect will be reduced in samples in which the sizes of diffracting crystallites are consistently less than 1 µm, however this effect can still reduce the experimental intensities of the strongest reflecting peaks by up to 25%.

Absorption Absorption phenomena related to fluorescence effects have already been discussed. Absorption also occurs related to the area of a powder specimen and depth of penetration of the x-ray blarger area ofvalues, the irradiated area will smaller, but depth of penetration greater. In general, thtend to be offsetting effects as related to diffracted intensity over the angular range of the data collection. The calculated intensity will include a term for 1/µs where µs is the linear absorption coefficient of the specimen.

Microabsorption Microabsorption is a phenomenon that occurs in polyphase samples. Typically the linear absorption coefficient is calculated based the proportions of the phases in the mixture. Microabsorption occurs when large crystaboth anomalous absThe effect is minimized in diffraction experiments by decreasing the crystallite size in the specimen.

Monochromator Polarization

As noted previously, the diffracted beam is partially polarized by the diffraction process. A crystal monochromator can modify the intensity of the diffracted beam, thus a term relatedthe diffractinoted that for pyrolitic graphite (minimize the intensity loss due to the polarization effect such that the correction term tends to over estimate the intensity loss.

The Intensity Equation All of the previous factors affecting the intensity of a diffraction peak may be summarized inthe following equations. Though we will not actually calculate diffraction patterns with these equations in this course, it can be done apatterns” in the ICDD Powderfrom Jenkins and Snyder (1996).




The Intensity of diffraction peak from a flat rectangular sample of phase α in a diffractomwith a fixed receiving slit (neglecting air absorption), may be described as:

eter

s

hklehklI

µαα

α)(

)( = vKK

Here Ke is a constant for a particular experimental system: 2

264 ⎟⎠

⎜⎝ cmr e

e π

23

⎟⎞

⎜⎛

=eI

K oλ

where:

• I0 = incident beam intensity

= distance from the specimen to the detector

ation

radius

f the specimen

Also, K from the crystal structure of phase α:

• r

• λ = wavelength of the X-radi

• (e2/mec2)2 is the square of the classical electron

• µs = linear attenuation coefficient o

• vα = volume fraction of phase α in specimen

(hkl)α is a constant for each diffraction reflection hkl

hkl

mhkl

hklhkl F

VM

K ⎟⎟⎠

⎜⎜⎝

=θθαα cossin

)2(cos)2(cos12

2

)(2)( ⎞θθ

α

2

where:

• Mhkl = multiplicity for reflection hkl of phase α

α = volume of the unit cell of phase α

d polarization corrections for the the diffracted beam monochromator

hromator

Ch e calculation of a diffraction pattern for taproced culations. This simple cubic example with two elements in the

⎛ + 2

• V

• the fraction in parentheses equals the Lorentz andiffractometer (Lp)hkl, including a correction for

• 2θ = the diffraction angle of the monocm

• F(hkl)α = the structure factor for reflection hkl including anomalous scattering and temperature effects

apt r 3 of Jenkins and Snyder (1996) includes a samplepo ssium chloride (KCl). Students are encourage read the chapter and follow the

ures used in these calunit cell can be handled with relatively simple calculations. More complex diffraction pattern calculations are done with computers and programs specifically written for the purpose.




Anisotropic Distortions of the Diffraction Pattern The figure at below (from Jenkins and Snyder, 1996) schematically illustrates the

atomic

position destroying long range

.

.

e

have completely

ossess

use p tive

phase identification) preferred orientation can be recognizeduseful results in spite of it.

ls exhibit preferred orientation as a characteristic Some types of ceramic magnets, extruded wires, most pressed eered films and polymers require manipulating and measuring

meter

be recognized and compensated for when

progression from atoms to crystalline structure.

A crystallite comprises a number of cells systematically grouped together to form acoherently diffracting domain. If the cells are not identical, and show variations in

order, the material is amorphous. Where individual cells are highly ordered, the material is called crystallineThe “ideal” situation is that the individual crystallites in the sample are completely randomWhen the crystallites take up some common orientation, thspecimen is showing preferred orientation.

In general, the most desirable analytical situation in a specimen is torandom orientation of uniformly small crystallites which psufficient long range order such that each crystallite diffracts strongly. Some types of diffraction analysis (i.e., the study of clay minerals) make es of analysis (i.e., qualita and worked around to yield

Preferred Orientation Many natural and engineered materia

of preferred orientation of these crystallites, and in other ty

property of the material. powders and many enginpreferred orientation. This frequently involves the use of a special pole-figure diffractoto measure a particular single diffraction.

In general powder diffraction data, preferred orientation is probably the most common cause of deviation of experimental diffractometer data from the ideal intensity pattern for the phase(s) analyzed. Preferred orientation canidentifying crystalline phases in a specimen, but is much more difficult to deal with when attempting to do quantitative analysis or precise unit cell calculations.

The most common way of dealing with preferred orientation in a material of known composition is to compare the diffraction intensities of the specimen showing preferred




orientation with the calculated (random) pattern for the material. Some data analysissoftware (including MDI’s Jade) will adjust data to correct for preferred orientation in a specimen when attempting quantitative analysis.

Crystallite Size

large size (i.e., thousands of unit cells), the nature diffraction will produce only at the precise location of the Bragg angle. This is because of the

)

g.

e

For crystallites ofdiffraction peaks canceling of diffractions by incoherent scattering at other angles by the lattice planes within the large crystal structure. If the particle size is smaller (such that there are insufficient lattice planes to effectively cancel all incoherent scattering at angles close to the Bragg anglethe net result will be a broadening of the diffraction peak around the Bragg angle. This phenomenon of widening of diffraction peaks is related to incomplete “canceling” of small deviations from the Bragg angle in small crystallites is known as particle size broadeninParticle size broadening is differentiated from the normal width of diffraction peaks related to instrumental effects. In most cases, particle size broadening will not be observed with crystallite sizes larger than 1 µm. The crystallite size broadening (βτ) of a peak can usually brelated to the mean crystallite dimension (τ) by the Scherrer equation:

θβλτ

cosK

= τ

where βτ is the line broadening due to the effect of sm stallites. Here βτ is given by (B – b), B being the breadth of the observed diffraction line at its half-intensity maximum, and b

s,

r

s nd

ing

e

re

raction pattern obtained from many a

mp” in

all cry

the instrumental broadening or breadth of a peak that exhibits no broadening beyond the inherent instrumental peak width. Note that βτ is given in radianand that K is the shape factowhich typically has a value of about 0.9. The general relation ishown in Fig. 3.21 (Jenkins aSnyder, 1996).

Note that particle size broadenis not significant at sizes above10,000 Å (1 µm). When instrumental parameters are known (i.e., FWHM values for crystallites larger than 1 µm), threlationship above may be used to calculate crystallite sizes as small as 10 Å if the structures aunstrained.

It is interesting to think of particle size broadening when considering the diffamorphous materials. Typically these materials (like glass nd plastics) will give an extremely broad peak over an angular range of perhaps 10° 2θ that will look like a “hu




the background. One can think of this “hump” as an extreme example of particle sizebroadening where the short range ordering is on the order of a few angstroms.

Residual Stress and Strain

o types of diffraction effects. If the strain is uniform ) it is called macrostrain and the unit cell distances will become

the

e

of ompressive forces resulting in a

t

,

onclusions etical” treatment of the

including our

etermination it uss

the practical aspects of x-ray powder diffract

Strain in a material can produce tw(either tensile or compressive

either larger or smaller resulting in a shift indiffraction peaks in the pattern. Macrostrain causes the lattice parameters to change in a permanent (but possibly reversible) manner resulting in a peak shift. Macrostrains may binduced by glycolation or heating of clay minerals.

Microstrains are produced by a distributiontensile and cbroadening of the diffraction peaks. In some cases, some peak asymmetry may be the resulof microstrain. Microstress in crystallites maycome from dislocations, vacancies, shear planesetc; the effect will generally be a distribution ofpeaks around the unstressed peak location, and a crude broadening of the peak in the resultant pattern. These effects are shown in a very generalized way in Figure 3.23 (Jenkins and Snyder, 1996).

CThis concludes our “theordiffraction process,crystallography review, and aspects of the crystal structure (peak positions) dies). In the next several weeks we will discion, and hopefully you will find that the theory

lurking in the background of your data interpretations will assist greatly in helping to understand what your data is telling you.

and crystal chemistry determination (intens



Intensity Variations in X-ray Powder Data

Documents

Transcript of Intensity Variations in X-ray Powder Data