Richard EverettICT Officer Strategic Development

Essex County Council

Aref Taidi Newera Controls

CIBSE Intelligent Buildings Group (IBG)

Investing in your property – Reducing operational cost and being sustainable

Ask not ‘what can you do for your technology?’ ask ‘what can your technology do for you?’

with apologies to John F Kennedy

Investing in your property – Reducing operational cost and

being sustainable!

Retrofit

Refurbishment

New build

Why sustainable?

Definition

An intelligent building is a dynamic and responsive architecture that provides every occupant with productive, cost effective and environmentally approved conditions through a continuous interaction among its four basic elements: places (fabric; structure; facilities); processes (automation; control; systems;) people (services; users) and management (maintenance; performance) and the interrelation between them.

The CIB Working Group W098 (1995).

Behaviours

• Tidy or untidy • Methodical or haphazard• Good memory or Forgetful

• Lighting, heating and systems – consume energy– control them

• Automation – switch it off• Show results

The ideal

• E1 - Economy = minimising cost

• E2 - Efficiency = making best use of resources

• E3 - Effectiveness = degree of achievement of outcome

• E4 - Efficacy = degree of relevance of outcome.

The goal – 4 E’s

eee

e

E1 - Economic Drivers

•Increase in building values:•10.9% for new buildings • 6.8% for retrofits

•Increase in return on investment (ROI):

• 9.9% for new buildings •19.2% for retrofits

McGraw-Hill Green Outlook 2011 Report

E1 - Architectural view

Sarah Daly – Governor, Gloucestershire College

E2 - Efficiency

• Reduced running costs– 36%

• Reduced energy bills– 20%

• Lighting control reductions– 30-40%

• Energy cost savings– 10-50%

• Reduction in operating costs– 13.6% for new buildings – 8.5% for retrofits

E2 - Energy efficient buildings

The following features are important:

High levels of thermal insulationNatural ventilation – connected spacesExclude excessive solar gainHigh efficiency lightingIndividual control measuresEfficient systems equipment and appliancesEmploy effective facilities management

Clements-Croome (2007)

E2 - Energy usage (of all energy)

• Energy used to construct buildings– 5%

• Energy used to heat, light and ventilate buildings– 45%

• Edwards (2002)

E3 - Effective

• Reduction of temperature (1oC)= higher productivity (1.8%)

• Productivity increase (0.5%) pay back 1.6 yrs

• RAE reports improvement in productivity (17%)

E3 - Pedagogy

• Worker Performance =

Motivation x Ability x Opportunity

• Tasks - Individuals– Want to do– Capable of doing– Can be done

• Building creates– Physical environment.

E4 - Efficacious

• Sustainable environmental approach

• Reduction in carbon emissions– 15%

• Carbon saving strategies– High potential

• Educational value

E4 - Carbon Trust

• High potential – Building Controls

– Smart metering

– Building fabric• Heating, ventilation• Cooling, integrated design

• Lower potential – Biomass (for electricity generation),

– Nuclear Fusion,

– Solar photovoltaic

Carbon Trust (2001)

iB

intelligent Unified messaging

Cause and effect

Building MgmtSystems

Infrastructure

Trend analysis

AV

Digital signage

Thin client Blade PCs

Cashless catering

IP telephony

mLearning

Wireless

Smart cards

Learning technology

Library systems

Room management

Buildings

The evidenceThe 4E’s ExamplesEconomic Reduction of 24% capital cost (Bowen 2005)

ROI of 10 years (Kelly 2008)Command more rent (Burr 2008)

Efficient Reduction of 36% in running costs (Bowen 2005)Energy bills reduced by 20% (Johnson 2007)Lighting control reductions of some 30-40% (Ratcliff 2008) Identity and Access Management strategy paid for out of efficiency gains (Tizard and Mockford 2008)Energy cost savings between 10-50% (Shapiro 2009)

Effective Small productivity gain (0.1-2.0%) large effect (Woods 1989; Clements-Croome 2000 and 2005)Reducing temperature – higher productivity – 1.8% for every 1°C. (Niemelä et al 2001, 2002; Wargocki and Wyon 2006)Increase in quality of learning as a result of higher productivity (Everett 2009; Bakó-Biró 2007and 2008; Clements-Croome 2008; Wargocki and Wyon 2007;)0.5% productivity increase pays back within 1.6 years (Wyon 1996) 17% improvement in productivity – RAE (McDougall et al 2002)Increased rents by 2-6% (Eichholtz, Kok, and Quigley 2009; RICS 2009)Occupancy rates 4.1% higher (Burr 2008)Higher income growth over 10 years (Baue 2006)

Efficacious Sustainable environmental approach (Edwards 2002)Carbon saving strategies (Carbon Trust 2002)15% reduction in global carbon emissions (Thomas 2009) Focussing on quality of learning (Everett 2009)

McGraw-Hill Green Outlook 2011 Report – Drivers

•Reduction in operating costs of:•13.6% for new buildings • 8.5% for retrofits

•Increase in building values:•10.9% for new buildings • 6.8% for retrofits

•Increase in return on investment (ROI):• 9.9% for new buildings •19.2% for retrofits

http://construction.com/market_research

Developing a sustainability virtuous circle in Education

“If you cannot measure it, you cannot improve”

Lord Kelvin (William Thomson 1824-1907)

•Occupant culture change?

•The culture change challenge •Buildings influencing occupiers•Occupiers influencing buildings.

So why now?

• Climate change• Its possible now

– Software based (not electronics/hardware)

– Cost of deployment– Affordable– Retrofit or legacy – Scalability

The challenge• The 4 e’s• Silo thinking - different perspectives

– The building– ICT– Occupant’s– Educational

• Government policy– Economic imperative

• Culture change within education– Learner is central – why–  Leadership management staff and students

• VLEs and MLEs– Output devices

• Sustainability as an educational goal• Behaviour in buildings –

– electricity – gas – water – waste

The Solution - rationale

• Don’t throw out the baby with the bathwater– maintaining the people controls – – enhancing with electronic controls – extending with culture change

• = virtuous circle– IT as friend not an enemy

• iBMS– multiplicity of systems controlling the building

environment

• Reducing operational cost– green effects– sustainability goals

• Behaviour in buildings

The solution

• Feedback mechanisms– Hattie

• Management mechanisms– Facilities Management and data

• iBMS – Data input

• KPIs and performance management– Benchmarking and Performance Management – KPIs and Performance Management

• Technology facilitating systems data communication

– MLEs and VLEs– Interoperability and integration

 • Business intelligence

– Digital Dashboards

Inputs

Processes

Outputs

A case study in progress

• Bringing it all together • Using

– Occupiers– Technology – Intelligence

• to create a virtuous circle

• using dashboard technology

A process model

Digital dashboard

A technological modelhttp://www.newera-controls.com

GCS 3000 Architecture

Demonstration - Newera

• What are typical first steps– Legacy BMS (using Newera as

aggregator)– No BMS using Newera to create retrofit

‘BMS’– Data output through Ecodriver

• or other similar products• Orders by Feb 28th 2011

– Special discount for RSC Eastern Refurbishment Forum delegates

• win a tin of quality Street– Put card in bowl -

Some typical outputs

Looking for a pilot - you?

Richard EverettAref Taidi

CIBSE (IBG)

07766 611 826