Intellectual Property Patents & Trademarks TC 310 June 19, 2008.
-
Upload
cori-watts -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Intellectual Property Patents & Trademarks TC 310 June 19, 2008.
Intellectual PropertyPatents & Trademarks
TC 310June 19, 2008
Patent Background
Patent Clause is in Constitution Power of Congress Needs statute to have effect
Protects products, processes Allows a temporary monopoly
Make, use, sell Incentive to innovate
Process
Patent Statutes create Patent Office Application necessary
Provisional Formal
Patent Office examines New Useful Nonobvious
Novelty (newness)
Something brand new Make use of prior knowledge
Cite literature Inevitableness
Conflicts over Priority Conception Reduction to practice Due diligence
Utility
Must have some use of value Novelty/ curiosity fails test Something can be novel, no utility Specific Utility Substantial utility
Research process no Effective drug, not on people, yes
Nonobviousness
Similar to novelty BUT, now we deal with inevitable Fail this test if
Others could do it easily Indicated as possible
Still use old inventions Add synergy is key
Abusing Patents
Double Patents Break up invention Several patent protections Terminal Disclaimer used instead
Only 1 Patent Ever Allowed per invention No extensions
Infringement
Two-step process Examine patent Apply description to object
Do not need to be identical, just similar Can apply to sub-parts of patent Ignorance not a defense
Patent holder must make infringer aware
Telecom Patents
Laws of Nature not patentable Includes algorithms
Processes using laws of natures are What is patentable?
Software Video game hardware Infrastructure devices Online processes (facebook example)
Trademarks
Unlike Patents, Trademarks are purely statutory Problems with federalism Lanham Act of 1946 Cover only Interstate matters
Serves to identify producer, market producer
Rules for Trademarks
Must be in use before protected Can expire
Federal registry of trademarks This is optional
Distinctiveness Marks must be sufficienty different
Loss of Protection
Abandonment Discontinue use, no intent to resume
3 years Not changing to remain distinctive
Excused abandonment Discontinued, but want to resume Economic situations Burden is on users
Infringement
Confusion is the standard Similarity
Sound, connotation, appearance, goods, “trade channels”
Conditions of sale Impulse v Considered
Actual confusion Amount of time, similarity of goods
Telecom Trademarks
Importance in Telecom Use of AT&T name by Cingular Services very similar, name matters
Use of URLs Want trademark to match URL Willing to pay?