Integrative Case Study George Mason University EDUC 613...4 INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY Virginia Standard...
Transcript of Integrative Case Study George Mason University EDUC 613...4 INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY Virginia Standard...
1
INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY
Integrative Case Study
Learning Factors of a High School Student
George Mason University
EDUC 613
Soo Kang
December 12th
, 2013
This is a case study about motivational and affective, social and developmental, and individual
differences learning factors of a high school student: Christian
2
INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY
Part 1: Descriptive Discussion 3
a. Introduction 3
b. Physical Description and Background 3
c. Setting 5
d. Learning Factors 7
e. Summary 8
Part 2: Analytic Discussion 10
a. Introduction 10
b. Motivational and Affective Factors 10
c. Developmental and Social Factors 13
d. Individual Differences Factors 15
e. Recommendation 17
f. Summary 19
Part 3: Reflective Self-Evaluation 20
a. Introduction 20
b. Christian as Learner (What I learned) 20
c. About Learning (Why it matters) 22
d. Changes in Teaching (Next steps) 24
Part 4: References 25
Appendices
Appendix A – Student Interview 26
Appendix B – Student Limited English Proficiency Student Profile 27
Appendix C – Teacher Interview 28
Appendix D – Nurse’s Note 29
Appendix E – School Demographics Information 30
Appendix F – Student Grit Survey 31
Appendix G – Multiple Intelligence 32
3
INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY
Part 1: Descriptive Discussion
Introduction
To educate is to make differences in lives of all students. However, sometimes in the
classroom we do not tell students how valuable and important they are regardless of their
academic performances. Teaching a standardized curriculum to assess students with a common
assessment seems equal and fair on the surface, but in the process of doing this we sometimes
forget to celebrate individual differences and diversity, which makes learning, classrooms and
the whole experience meaningful and wonderful. After all, we are not machines programmed to
maximize teaching and learning outcomes but human beings who naturally question, seek
answers, and care about meanings and values in life. To make differences in the classroom daily,
teachers must not only provide students with necessary knowledge and skills but also care for
individual needs by simply having interest in each and one of our students.
The value of studying individual learners and their learning is that it helps us to
understand what students learn, how they learn and why they learn. This is a case study that
examines one learner, Christian and the influences on his learning. I will be looking at how the
motivational and affective, social and developmental, and individual differences factors
influence his learning. To protect the identity of the student, I have given pseudonyms to the
student as well as the school he attends.
Physical Description and Background
Christian is a 16 year-old 11th
-grade student who is taking Geometry as his second
mathematics course in high school. He just finished his first quarter of his third year at the Green
Giant High School. He is from Dominican Republic and he is enrolled as an English Language
Learner student. His Limited English Proficient (LEP) Plan does not exempt him from the
4
INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY
Virginia Standard or Learning tests, but allows him to use bilingual dictionary, accommodation
code 17 (Student LEP profile – Appendix C). Christian is in Tier B and his listening and
speaking skills are adequate to perform proficiently in all of his academic classes. Physically,
Christian is average sized compared to his male classmates and he works out regularly with his
friends after school for extracurricular activity. Christian does not play any competitive sports or
belong in any other extracurricular activity teams in school. Christian values physical health and
he is very careful about his food and drink intake. In his interaction with peers, Christian
minimally expresses his thoughts and feelings in groups bigger than four but engages more
actively in smaller group or in pairs with another student or a teacher.
Christian was born in Dominican Republic in 1997. His family moved to the United
States in 2002. He was in Piaget’s preoperational stage where he was gradually developing use
of language and ability to think in symbolic form (Sample & Kursman, 2013). Christian
indicated during his interview that even though he has lived more than half of his life in the
United States, he considers his first language to be Spanish because his primary language at
home is Spanish. He also mentioned that he considers himself as bilingual because he
‘“sometimes feels more comfortable saying things in English”’ (Student Interview –Appendix
A). He is taking Spanish Fluent Speaker 3 for his foreign language credit, but his grade in the
course is low. His Spanish teacher informed me that his frequent absences and lack of
participation caused his grade to go down in the end of the first quarter. (Teacher Interview –
Appendix D).
I selected Christian because I wanted to get to know him better so that I can help him
with his learning progress. Frequent absences can cause serious deficits in our fast paced
learning environment but he always stays responsible by sending emails to teachers for his
5
INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY
assignments. Christian also seems more reserved but always stays after school to talk about his
learning, life, and feelings in person. Christian reminded me of myself in high school. Christian
seems to be one of those students who is capable of performing above average in math class, but
he is not always ‘gritty’ enough to achieve his best. Christian’s parents came to the Back to
School Night in the beginning of the school year. When I asked for contact information and any
concerns for Christian, they gave a phone number and left blank for the comment section. During
the phone interview with Christian’s mother later in the year, I asked again if she had any
concerns to share with me. She said that Christian usually works hard to get good grades in his
classes but his health issue became a serious issue in the past years. Christian’s parents were very
supportive in Christian’s education and wanted me to keep them updated if Christian starts to
struggle in class. Christian is living with his mom and dad but he also has one sister who is
married and moved to New Jersey. He is not receiving free or reduced priced lunches. When I
asked Christian about his constant absences he told me that he has an autoimmune disease. He
explained that his autoimmune disease defends his body against his own healthy cells, causing
his immune system to attack his body organs especially his small and large intestine. I recently
received a note from school nurse about Christian’s health issue and a permanent hallway pass to
clinic whenever he needs (Nurse’s Note – Appendix E).
Setting
Christian is attending school in Greenville, part of the Giant County Public Schools
system. With the explosive growth of Giant county's population and surrounding high density
housing developments, the school possesses one of the most culturally diverse student
populations in the region. There were 14,000 students in Giant County Public Schools 21 years
ago, now there are 68,000. The superintendent, Dr. Corn said that the county will ‘“continue to
6
INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY
grow by more than 2,000 students a year as far as the eye can see"’. According to the GCPS Fact
sheet 2012-2013, in 1998, Giant County Public Schools had a minority population of 19.44
percent. The minority population is 44 percent as of September 2012. Asian students are the
largest minority group with 16% closely followed by the Hispanic population with 15%
(Appendix E).
As a 11th grade student, Christian is in his third year in working toward his advanced
diploma. Class sizes are smaller than other high schools in the area, but Christian’s class is
slightly larger than most at 24 students, 10 of whom are boys. Christian is older than all of his
classmates who are mostly 9th and 10th graders. In the beginning of the school year, Christian
answered that he has no preference in working cooperatively in pairs, small groups, or
independently. The course instruction is given in lecture form with visual presentation. There are
10 table desks for two students to seat and there are four individual desks in the classroom.
Christian seats near the window by himself but joins a pair of students sitting near him during
class practice time. After learning a new concept, students work on guided practice in pairs, or in
small groups. Students work cooperatively and collaboratively in Christian’s class. Students are
expected to discuss theorems and examples with their work partners and independently journal in
composition books for closure. Students take daily quizzes and open note quizzes for formative
assessments, and takes summative unit tests after five to six lessons. Christian is provided with
Spanish-English dictionary for all of his assessments but never utilizes them because he does not
have any difficulty understanding directions or material (Student Interview –Appendix A).
Christian is enrolled in Advanced PE 2, Spanish Fluent Speaker 3, Environmental
Science, Personal Finance, Economics, US and VA History, English 11, and Geometry courses
this year. In Geometry class, Christian demonstrates fluency in Algebra skills because he was
7
INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY
enrolled in a daily Algebra 1 class last year. Christian’s Geometry class is energetic, cooperative
and academically motivated. Christian recently started working with two boys in class
voluntarily after spending first eight weeks working independently.
Learning Factors
I will be looking at three learning factors that influence Christian’s learning in this case
study: motivational and affective, social and developmental, and individual differences. Based on
the learner-centered psychological principles from the American Psychology Association, I will
be studying Christian’s intrinsic and extrinsic motivation by looking at his emotional states,
beliefs, interests, goals, and expectations. Christian wants to be successful academically. He
seeks help when needed and can identify his weaknesses. For instance, Christian expressed his
lack of understanding in classifying triangle lesson because he did not have a successful
mathematical learning in 6th grade. He appears to be self-driven and motivated beyond many of
his classmates, but does not always actively participate in classes to express his interests. I would
like to know where his intrinsic motivation is coming from and find a way to support Christian
by applying B.F. Skinner’s Reinforcement Theory.
The second learning factor that I will be studying is the developmental and social factors.
In the past three months, I have been noticing Christian’s social skills development demonstrated
in cooperative learning environment. I am interested in his social development such as social
interaction, interpersonal relation and communication skills and emotional intelligence (Student
Observations). Christian is also demonstrating varying levels of critical thinking in his closing
journal entries. His learning is certainly influenced by his development within and across
physical, intellectual, emotional and social domains and achievements. According to the
American Psychological Association, “the cognitive, emotional, and social development of
8
INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY
individual learners and how they interpret life experiences are affected by prior schooling, home,
culture, and community factors” (American Psychological Association 1997). Does Christian’s
language and culture difference have effects on his learning style and how do I support Christian
in developing his self-esteem?
Lastly, I will be looking at individual differences. Every student is unique in their
learning strategies, study approaches, and capabilities for learning as well as linguistic, cultural,
and social backgrounds. Even though Christian fits in with his classmates, from initial
observations, it does appear that he occasionally chooses to separate himself from others to work
alone in slower pace (Student Observations). His classmates noticed Christian’s frequent
absences and started to collect his study material for Christian. He often emails for typed notes
and asks questions but does not feel the need of extra tutoring. Understanding Christian's
strengths and weaknesses, as well as current knowledge and skills will allow teachers to provide
valuable feedback on his learning progress.
Summary
Because of Christian’s frequent absences, he developed his current studying pattern of
independent inquiry built upon his strong responsibility and work ethic. However, since low
attendance rate very often negatively correlate with mastery achievements in many classes, I am
concerned with his success in learning as advanced courses will be more rigorous. I wish to
investigate ways to assist Christian’s long term learning plan by comprehensively understanding
his learning factors and surroundings. I also see a pattern of many English Language Learners
being more reserved in classes despite their strong academic interests. By studying Christian, I
will have a better understanding in working with my diverse group of students. In Part 2: The
9
INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY
Analytic Discussion, I will analyzes data to describe learning factors of Christian using learning
theories and make research based recommendations.
Learning Factors and Data Sources Table
Learning Factors
Addressed Data Source Information Sought
Motivational and Affective
Student interview, Teacher
Interview, Class Observation,
Grit Score, Student work sample
Student motivation, interest,
goals, preferences, and student
self-perception , grittiness,
Student work habit/preference
Developmental and Social
Parental interview, Other
Students interviews, Class
Observation
Family background, anecdotal
story from previous school
years, parent concerns,
Relationships with peers
Individual Differences Student Journal Entries, MI and
LS Inventory
How the student learns,
interest, motivation, Learning
Styles and Multiple
Intelligence
Backgrounds and
Supplemental information
Nurses Notes, Report Card,
Diagnostic, Formative and
Summative Results
Health Issue, Student
Progress, number of absences
10
INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY
Part 2: The Analytic Discussion
Introduction
In this section, I analyze and synthesize data collected from various sources into a
coherent story that describes Christian as learner based on the data and educational theories such
as B.F. Skinner’s Behaviorism and Reinforcement Theory, Lev Vygotsky’s Personal and Social
Learning Theory, and Albert Bandura’s Self-Efficacy and Social Cognitive Learning Theory. I
will explain why Christian learns and practices independently but at the same time engages
actively in pair discussion and self reflection. I will also make research based recommendations
based on three learning factors; motivational and affective, social and developmental, and
individual differences after studying Christian’s way of learning, his challenge, strength and
weaknesses comprehensively. For example, Christian’s critical thinking and writing has been
improved by writing journals daily using Bloom’s taxonomy.
The Motivational and Affective Factor
One important learning factor to determine students’ achievement in the classroom is
motivation. Because students come into the classroom with varying areas of interests, emotional
states, emotional intelligence, and grittiness, different variables such as the physical arrangement
of the classroom or positive reinforcement strategies must be considered carefully by teachers to
create a positive learning environment for all students. It is necessary to study how students’
motivation and affects relate to their learning because current brain research shows that variables
such as students’ emotions, thinking, and learning are all linked together (Jensen 2005). Students
learn best in a supportive environment where teachers provide competence support and
autonomy support in fostering students’ motivational construct and achievement outcomes
(Zhang, Solmon, Gu 2012). In addition to finding what stimulates Christian’s intrinsic
11
INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY
motivation, I sought Christian’s emotional state, belief, interests and goals, and habits of
thinking.
In the initial observation of student behavior, I described Christian as ‘uninterested and
passive, sometimes detached from his peers and his learning on the surface.’ However, reading
his summary journals where he displayed active participation in critical thinking and thorough
understanding of learning objectives, I realized that Christian very well internalize concepts in
details and will demonstrate mastery when asked to write in summary journal (Student work
sample – Appendix G). Christian was intrinsically motivated by tasks that required him to
justify, relate, and compare. He put more time and effort when asked to use his own words and
draw his own diagrams. When he was given an open ended question like ‘compare and contrast
the triangle inequality theorem and the hinge theorem,’ he described and explained the theorems
using his eye glasses and its legs.
Although seating in pairs or in groups can foster social development and peer interaction
among students, I was concerned because such seating arrangement often caused increased
chatting and other disturbances that discourage deep concentration (Jensen, 2005). I wanted to
make sure that I was providing Christian with the external classroom environment where he can
feel most comfortable and productive to explore and express his intellectual curiosity. During his
interview I asked him how he felt about his self-expressive classmates during cooperative group
work. He answered that he doesn’t mind the noise level as long as no one is screaming or making
unnecessary noises. He shared with me that he had trouble concentrating when the noise level
gets too loud (Student Interview – Appendix A). Loud noises will increase heart rate and tense
muscle, and will impair learning over time (Jensen, 89).
12
INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY
His mature comments on purpose of student talk, cooperative learning and how he
benefits by asking questions to his peers indicated Christian’s strengths in emotional intelligence,
or character. Emotional intelligence is a strong indicator of student success in school and life as
powerful or even as twice as powerful as general IQ scores (Cobb and Mayer, 2000). In
classroom observation, Christian demonstrated excellent relationship management skills in
working and communicating effectively with others. Taking initiative, following through on
commitments and adapting to changing circumstances also suggests that Christian is skilled at
self management. Since Christian stopped coming to school due to his health issue, Christian
initiated email communication with his teachers to give updates on his circumstances and get
make up work. He said in one of his emails that he wants to be all caught up with school work
when his life goes back to normal after his treatment.
In addition to his initiation and work ethics, Christian’s teachers during interview
suggested that Christian wants to not just get good grades but also pursue his ‘curiosity’ and
‘genuine interest’ in his studies (Teacher Interview – Appendix D). When his interests were
there, Christian was successful, he got A’s and B’s in his two favorite classes, Personal Finance
and History. Christian seemed to be struggling in English and Science classes. Reading his
descriptive journal and summary made me wonder why he is struggling in his English class. His
previous ELL teacher and Christian both agreed that he is now fully proficient in English
Language, but is there another factor that is affecting Christian’s learning in academic English
class?
I considered another important factor that determines students’ success in the classroom;
the ‘grittiness.’ Grit is a performance trait like resilience, self control, and persistence that
research shows may matter more to academic performance than native intelligence (Pappano,
13
INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY
2013). Christian scored 3.67 out of 5 on grittiness, 3.5 out of 5 on the consistency of interest,
3.83 out of 5 on the perseverance of effort and 3 out of 5 on ambition survey (Grit Scale –
Appendix). Christian scored higher on the perseverance of effort, but scored lower on ambition,
as Duckworth noted, "you cannot be gritty at everything" (Duckworth, 2007). Researches has
not proved yet whether grit is a trait that can be taught, but teachers should apply B.F. Skinner’s
reinforcement theory to make up students lack of grittiness by providing extrinsic motivation.
Christian is motivated intrinsically enough to care about his learning but never asked for extra
credit, or to retake assessments to improve grade average in his classes. He is more stimulated by
intellectually intriguing questions than bonus point opportunities.
The Developmental and Social Factor
Although Christian is missing face to face social interactions with his peers at school, it
is evident that he is working to gain more interpersonal relations skills and communications
skills in working with teachers, school administrators, and his doctor to find solution for his
special situation. Teachers sometimes say ‘you cannot teach a ghost,’ meaning that it won’t be
possible to teach students who never show up for classes, but I feel that we should be able to
continue teaching and learning through the use social networking technology such as online
classroom, email communication like college courses offered online. It will require extra
commitment on students’ part and innovative methods of planning, instructional delivery and
assessing on teachers, but I believe online classroom will also provide students necessary 21st
century skills such as information and communications technology and information literacy. It is
upsetting to see the discontinuation of Christian’s learning because the system cannot
accommodate students with serious health issues. Especially when Christian’s parents are less
forceful in the process of demanding Christian’s need for learning, Christian will continue to
14
INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY
miss instruction which will cause an unavoidable gap in his learning experience. The social and
developmental factors significantly influence student and I will be looking at Christian’s
development within and across physical, cognitive, emotional and social domains.
In his last email, Christian said that he wants to go back to his normal life soon again so
that he can start coming to school. His parent and the school nurse said that Christian has been
staying home sick for more than two months now. With homebound instruction not getting
approved yet, Christian is staying home by himself most of the time. None of his classmates stay
in touch with Christian and they are forgetting about Christian. With social media such as
Facebook and Twitter so popular among teenagers nowadays, I find it very unusual for Christian
to stay completely isolated from his peers.
Before he went on his long term absences, I got to observe his social behavior
development in the classroom environment. He took his time in trust building and sharing with
his peers in the beginning stage of cooperative and collaborative learning but eventually became
a valuable member of his group. Research on cooperative learning indicates students’ preference
in the ‘safety of small groups and the confidence which they gained from sharing ideas’
(Sharan,). Jensen also makes practical suggestion on how to group students carefully to reduce
chitchats and distractions (Jensen, 2005). How Christian limits his social comments and stays
focused on task when working with his peers makes him a good role model to students in his
cooperative learning group. In Social Learning Theory, Albert Bandura states behavior is learned
from the environment through the process of observational learning (Cho and Rader-Sherry,
2013). To promote student engagement and mathematical conversation, students were told to ask
two people before they come to the teacher for an answer. Christian said that he would now
always wait until he gets to talk to his partner to ask questions rather than stopping the lecture to
15
INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY
ask the teacher. The social behavior connects to Lev Vygotsky’s Personal and Social Learning
Theory which states that students learn from each other in social settings (Wert and Haakonson,
2013). It is important to let students debrief and think through explanations in guided group
discussions because social experience is a brain-changing experience (Jensen, 2015).
Developmentally, Christian is emotionally more mature than his age group (Classroom
Observation). He is non-judgmental, accountable and open minded about his conditions. Three
teachers commented on his report card ‘Accepts Responsibility’ for his quarter 1 report card. In
parent interview, Christian’s mother said that Christian’s older and Christian has 12 year age
difference. She also added that even though his sister was a mature role model for Christian, she
was busy working full time job and Christian was often left home alone (Parent Interview).
Cognitively, Christian seems to be in formal operational stage of Piaget’s cognitive
developmental learning theory. Christian demonstrated ability think to abstractly and reason
theoretically on his Logics unit test in Geometry class. His previous years Algebra teacher also
said that Christian is capable of higher order thinking and is able to solve multi step problems.
Unlike many students in his age group struggling in planning stage of problem solving, Christian
is insightful in guiding his peers with suggestions.
Individual Differences Factor
Individual differences factors include individual differences in learning, diversity and
setting challenging standards and assessing the learner. Students have different strategies,
approaches, and capabilities of learning that are a function of prior experience and heredity. Also,
learning is most effective when differences in learner’s linguistic, cultural, and social
backgrounds are taken into accounts (American Psychological Association, 2012). Utilizing
variety of assessments such as diagnostic, formative and summative assessments will enable
16
INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY
teachers to set appropriate standards and expectations for the learner. Understanding individual
differences factor will allow teachers to effectively differentiate instruction and assessment to
maximize students' ability to learn and apply knowledge. In his book Fair Is Not Always Equal,
Wormli wrote that the first step of differentiation is getting to know about the learner through
interest survey, observation, and listening to the student (Wormli, PUT YEAT). Students
multiple intelligence and learning styles inventory results can be analyzed to find out what and
how students learn the best. Teachers can use students’ learning styles and multiple intelligences
profiles to develop effective learning prescriptions that accommodate students’ preferences and
strengths (Silver, Strong. Perini, 2010). Interviewing the learner, previous teachers and parents is
a good source to gather information to create learner’s profile.
Christian participated on a short online multiple intelligence and learning styles inventory.
In MI survey, Christian scored highest on self smart (interpersonal) with 4.43, second in both
logic/math and body movement (kinesthetic) with 3.71 out of possible 5 points (MI Inventory –
Appendix). Christian is theoretical, intellectual and knowledge oriented understanding style
learner who is curious about ideas, has a tolerance for theory, a taste for complex problems, and
a concern for long-range consequences. Intuitive Thinkers learns concept first, then fits details in.
They also have strong abstract reasoning and logical skills learn exceptionally quickly (Learning
Styles Inventory). In geometry class, Christian successfully used evidence to evaluate truth
values of conditional statements and applied theorems to compare different angle measures.
Recently, Christian’s been learning outside the classroom through inquiry. He is watching
relevant lesson videos on YouTube and looks for different examples online to complete problem
sets. After a child study meeting, the school came up with the new plan for Christian; teachers
are to provide Christian with makeup work from absent days when he comes back. It is not
17
INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY
exactly working out because even though Christian gets work he is not getting any direct
instructions. Even though he is motivated it would be very difficult to self teach six different
subjects. Christian does not work with a tutor. I made a suggestion to start homebound
instruction but according to the guidance counselor ‘“the process of getting homebound
instruction is complicated so it will not be an option for Christian.”’
The conversation with Christian’s guidance counselor reminded me of another student
from last year who rarely came to school due to her ‘severe depression.’ The parents of the
student were very demanding to the guidance counselor, teachers and school administrators
about putting their daughter in homebound instruction. The student seemed to be adjusting fine
when observed in school’s football games and other social events but she could not attend
classes because she was feeling extreme anxiety every morning. The student’s homebound
instruction went through quickly and she successfully finished school year with homebound
instructor visiting her twice a week. Often the voice of minority parents with limited English
proficiency doesn’t get heard in important decision making process of their child’s education.
Although Christian’s mom is very supportive in his learning in the classroom, she was not aware
of different options and supports available to Christian his education.
Recommendations
To motivate students, teachers must first find out what ways the brain is naturally
motivated from within (Jensen, 2012). Research leads us to understand that considering variety
of learning factors of students make effective evidence based teaching practice possible.
Christian is an intuitive thinking learner. He has an inclination for analyzing, testing, proving,
examining and connecting. To continue his learning outside the classroom, teachers must first
find meaningful and developmentally appropriate curriculum that allows Christian to engage in
18
INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY
independent inquiry. Provide constant feedback on his learning progress to foster his growth by
emails. Provide independent thinking time to develop but have Christian to share and defend his
point of view with his peers by facilitating cooperative and collaborative learning online and in
the classroom. Creating a discussion board for students to journal online and comment is a great
way to promote student conversation. With his intrapersonal intelligence, Christian can work on
computer and read and watch lesson videos as a source of instruction. He scored lower on
linguistic intelligence so reviewing essential vocabulary by having clear language objective as
well as learning objective will allow Christian to build necessary background.
Christian feels threatened in loud environment and does not enjoy working through steps
without having logical reasoning. Create a classroom environment where peer questioning and
explaining is encouraged but structured to prevent off task behaviors. Christian will often skip
asking further questions although he does not completely understand something. For example,
using triangle theorems to find missing angle measures made sense to him when demonstrated on
the board, however; he did not know what exterior angles of a triangle meant. As closing
question, teachers can ask Christian to journal about things that wasn’t too clear to him during
class. Asking Christian to explain each steps and details as well as getting the big picture will
help him to understand the entire problem solving process. Utilize Bloom’s taxonomy verbs,
such as analyze and evaluate in addition to practice on comprehension.
Christian responds well to teachers who listen to and care for his individual needs.
Weekly email with a list of concepts covered in classes can keep Christian updated and on track
of his learning. Updating webpage with assignments saved as downloadable files so that it is
accessible will not only help Christian but other students. Lastly, involve his parents in
Christian’s education by working with the ELL department staff. The ELL staff invites parents
19
INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY
regularly to discuss student progress, talk about school procedures and overall make welcoming
environment for parents so that they more actively be involved in their children’s’ education.
Summary
The purpose of studying and understanding learning factors of students is to provide all
students with fair opportunity to their learning. Teaching and learning is a student teacher
interaction where both parties work cooperatively to achieve common goal of mastery learning.
To facilitate effective learning, teachers need to be sensitive to students’ needs, accommodate
different learning styles, and respect individual differences. The American Psychology
Association Learner-Centered Psychological Principles lists four learning factors: cognitive and
metacognitive, motivational and affective, developmental and social, and individual differences.
I looked at motivational and affective, developmental and social and individual differences
factors of Christian’s learning. In my analysis, I learned that his learning factors are affecting one
another; his strong interpersonal intelligence and emotional development makes Christian an
inquisitive learner with strong intrinsic motivation to do well. It will not be possible to do an
integrated case study on each and every one of my students but understanding one student will be
helpful when teaching students who has similar learning style, motivational factors, social and
developmental factors as Christian. In ‘How MI informs teaching at New City School’ Hoerr
introduced a school environment where teachers are working together to write curriculums and
activities to teach students according to their multiple intelligence and learning styles (Hoerr,
2004). Teachers at our school are having meetings to decide on what kind of professional
development trainings we will have for next year and many teachers are agreeing on having a
make and take day to build engaging activities for the next year. It is exciting to see how more
and more teachers are working together to listen to students needs.
20
INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY
Part 3: Reflective Self-Evaluation
Introduction
I have been hearing more teachers saying ‘I will do what it takes to help my students
learn’ than ‘I taught but my student didn’t learn.’ Teachers who genuinely care for students’
learning always reflect on their teaching practice and stay as an active member of learning
community by contributing to action research on effective teaching practice. The exciting idea of
best teaching keep teachers busy with professional development educating and training us to be
extremely knowledgeable in our field but without being able to explain ‘here is why I do what I
do,’ we are not truly growing professionally or personally. What we do in our classroom should
be aligned with our teaching philosophy, our belief on why I do what I do. Effective teachers are
expected to differentiate instructions, use cooperative and collaborative learning model, and
utilizing authentic assessments in the classroom. Why do we have to work hard to provide fair
opportunities to all learners? We do what we do because it is the right thing to do; because it is
how I would like to be treated as student, how I want my child to be treated in school, and every
parent of our students want in their children’s education, no matter how tricky and challenging
being fair can be.
Christian as Learner: What I learned
I am pleased with having selected Christian as my case study student, even though he
stopped coming to school during this study. He was frequently absent during the first quarter but
I never knew that he would stop coming to school completely. It was an unplanned influence on
his learning that teachers did not have a plan to quickly fill the gap from his absent days. He
dropped three classes and now has a new schedule. He will only be taking two classes each day
and he will stay in Geometry class. I did not learn about Christian's special health issue until I
21
INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY
started this Case Study. The individual factor kept Christian away from the classroom but
because he was absent so much I had to start thinking of ways to communicate with him and
make learning happen. I was not necessarily giving Christian instruction or teaching him, but I
had to think of ways to facilitate his learning outside the classroom. It made me think of students
who are physically in class but mentally not presents to listen to instruction. Again, I realized
how important it is to have students engaged in their learning.
Sometimes I got upset talking to his guidance counselor who wouldn’t even consider
homebound instruction. I wanted to help Christian even if that meant working extra hours and
putting extra effort. Studying Christian as a learner was challenging but also very rewarding
because it taught me lessons about student learning in difficult situation and about the purpose of
what teacher do. Hardship in teaching students with frequent absences made me think critically
about my passion, ability and limit in helping Christian. I definitely care for Christian's learning
but without a set system or plan I could not continue to write two page emails to Christian for
each class he missed. I looked for new technology that is actually feasible in our school building.
I have not figured out a definite method yet but I also got an insight on how to prepare
my students with the necessary 21st century skills such as critical thinking, problem-solving,
decision-making, and communication and collaboration skills in teaching my current curriculum.
I used to think the curriculum I am teaching was lacking in ways of teaching 21st century skills;
where and when will my students actually ever use triangle angle measures in real life. As I was
working with Christian I realized that 21st century skills are the life skills human beings can
acquire through problem solving in life experiences, education, and interaction with others.
Meaningful and authentic assignment will engage students to think critically about solving real
22
INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY
life problems. For example, I used sugar cookie recipe to have students work on unit conversion
and solving problems involving ratio and proportions.
In regards to other students in the class or about the group as a whole, I learned that to
teach students with varying achievement levels, motivational, social and developmental factors,
teachers must interact with them in any forms possible to make differences in their life. I learned
that even just staying couple minutes after school to have a caring chat with a student can make
differences in their attitude to learning a subject. Even if students think they hate the subject
matter, or have to go through multiple failures in their attempt, I feel responsible to be there for
students to celebrate their achievement when they finally have that moment of success in their
learning.
About Learning: Why it matters
The case study made me think about teaching in standard based and performance based
settings, and teaching to the standardized test, and celebrating small yet noteworthy individual
success moments. I sometimes felt conflicted teaching standard based curriculum when it felt so
outdated to teach 21st century skills. At times I felt what I was teaching is not worthy because my
students were not learning like students in Khan Academy. I thought about lessons I learned
about learning and myself as a learner.
How did I learn and what did I learn growing up? I have never heard of the word critical
thinking, technology or different learning styles until I got to my junior year at undergraduate
education program. I learned successfully in schools because responsible character and work
ethics were always expected of me. I think it is important as a teacher now to have the same high
expectation on my students. Instead of making learning easy for students, I need to challenge
23
INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY
students constantly even thought that means discomfort, because without getting outside their
comfort zones, students will stop growing.
The first year I tried differentiated instruction went disastrous because I did not know
what a real differentiated classroom look like. After reading Wormeli’s Busting Myths about
Differentiated Instruction, I understood that differentiated instruction isn’t watering down the
curriculum but it is challenging all students by helping them to learn in their best ability. My
honest ideas and feelings about learning is that learning shouldn’t have to be fun and exciting,
but it has to be meaningful in some ways. I believe that learning itself is an enjoyable experience
that teachers don’t need to act like salesman in the classroom to attract students to learn from
them. I wish that people would stop asking teachers to always present learning as pleasurable
events that they can decide to sometimes participate. It will be helpful to provide comfortable
physical learning environment and supports but what is really important in education is to make
a long lasting change in students. Educators must help students to be responsible by holding
students accountable long ago. Two years ago I had a principal who told teachers to make
decisions for their students because high school students are too young to decide what is right for
them in their education. The other day one of my student told me that he was happy with getting
a C in Algebra 1 test. I felt ashamed of always just pushing students to get A’s and B’s to go to
good college and get a better career in the future. Even though he got a C on the summative test,
he accomplished his learning target and showed mastery. Teaching and learning shouldn’t be
about making students’ life miserable by forcefully spoon feeding them with information that
they cannot understand nor feel the need to understand. Teaching and learning must be about
motivating and assisting students in their social, physical, and intellectual development so that
they make meaningful decisions according to their individual differences.
24
INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY
Changes in Teaching: Next steps
The case study process changed the way I teach, think about, and relate to students as
learner. Before I taught without really thinking why I teach. I am teaching the same Virginia
mathematics curriculum as last years but now, I teach all students to have fair opportunity in
their learning. I provide support, listen and care for their individual needs. I still teach so that all
students can pass the standard of learning test in May. I teach so that students who are going to
colleges can pass their mathematics placement tests to take courses they want. I teach so that
obstructive variables from not passing these standardized tests do not prevent my students from
achieving what they want in their life. The case study helped me to consider difficult life
situations students are going through in addition to their education. I now value physical, social,
and emotional development of students as well as intellectual development.
If I had Christian in my class two years ago, I don't think I would relate to Christian as
much as I did this year. I think I learn so much every year and my plan for the next step is to
connect with more students. It was a valuable growth moment for me to be able to relate to
Christian and to interact with more people to make his learning possible. Christian came back to
school the other day and learned new things about similar triangles. Students may be outside the
classroom physically or mentally but they always will come back to learn and grow more.
25
INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY
Part 4: References
Affective: Zhang, T., Solmon, M. A., & Gu, X. (2012). The role of teachers’ support in
predicting students’ motivation and achievement outcomes in physical education. Journal
of Teaching in Physical Education, 31(4), 329-343.
American Psychological Association (2009). Publication manual of the American Psychological
Association (6th
Ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Cobb ,C., & Mayer, J. D. (2000). Emotional intelligence. Educational Leadership 58(3), 72-75.
Duckworth, A.L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M.D., & Kelly, D.R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and
passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1087-1101.
Jensen, E. (2005). Teaching with the brain in mind (2nd Ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for
Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Individual: Hoerr, T. (2004). How MI informs teaching at New City School. Teachers College
Record, 106(1), 40-48.
Pappano, L. (2013). ‘Grit’ and the new character education. Harvard Education Letter, 29, 1-3.
Sample, J., Kursman, E. (October, 2013). Piaget: Learning theorist individual project. EDUC
613, George Mason University.
Silver, H, Strong, R., & Perini, M. (2000). So each may learn: Integrating learning styles and
Multiple intelligences. ASCD: Alexandria, VA.
Wormeli, R. (2006). Fair isn't always equal: assessing & grading in the differentiated classroom.
Portland, Me.: Stenhouse Publishers.
Wormeli, R. (2005). Busting Myths about Differentiated Instruction
26
INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY
Appendix A
Student Interview
Interview with Student (Christian)
1. How do you feel? I feel okay today. I have to tell you about my chronic illness.
2. Tell me about your chronic illness. The nurse told me to talk to all my teachers about my
illness because I will miss school often. I have an auto-immune diseases, it means my
body attacks itself. It especially attacks my large intestine so I get belly aches.
3. Can I ask the nurse for more information? Sure
4. How are you doing in class? It is going okay, I understand Geometry. I had Mrs. Harris
last year.
5. You had Daily Algebra? How did that go? Math was the only subject I was okay with
having every day class. Some kids were crazy but I did good.
6. Do you mind If I talk to Mrs. Harris about ways to help your learning this year? I don’t
mind.
7. You missed three classes last month, how do you manage make up work? I have to make
up some tests but my counselor is talking to me about schedule change.
8. Is it okay for me to chat with you after class every A-day so that I can learn more about
you as a learner? That is fine.
9. What language do you speak? Spanish/English. I speak Spanish at home.
10. Does your family speak English? My sister does but she is not home she lives in New
Jersey and my mom and dad speak English.
11. Do you use bilingual dictionary in other classes? I never need to so I don’t use it.
12. Do you feel more comfortable speaking in English or Spanish? I sometimes feel more
comfortable saying things in English.
27
INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY
Appendix B
Student Limited English Proficiency Student Profile
Demographic Information
Name: Christian First Language: Spanish
Grade 11 Language Literacy: yes or no
Age 16 Country of Origin: Dominican Republic
Years in U. S. Schools: 8 Years in native country schools: 2
Interrupted education yes or no
Standardized Testing Information
Screening Assessment and Score: W-APT 1.8 (Grade 7) Date: August 23,2011
The following proficiency levels are provided on the ACCESS for ELLs®
Teacher Score Report: Spring 2013 Testing
Tier A B C
Overall Score (Composite) 5.4 Listening 5.2
Literacy Score 4.8 Speaking 6.0
Comprehension Score 4.6 Reading 4.2
Oral Language Score 5.6 Writing 4.2
28
INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY
Appendix C
Teacher Interview
Mrs. Harris: Christian was in my daily class with other ELL students. Christian helped low
achieving students. He has good work ethics and he shouldn’t struggle in his classes, he is smart,
but he missed many days.
Mrs. Counselor: Christian is supposed to come to school. He can’t just not come to school and
we are not going for homebound because it is a long process. He needs to come to school.
Mr. Joe: Christian does make up all the work for me. He is responsible and will do his work but
he rarely shows up for my class.
Mr. Dunning: Christian will not need any accommodations next year. We will be having a child
study meeting to discuss his absences.
29
INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY
Appendix D
Nurse’s Note
**Christian has permanent pass to clinic anytime he needs.
What is ulcerative colitis?
Ulcerative colitis is a disease that causes inflammation and sores (ulcers) in the lining of the large intestine. It usually affects the lower section (sigmoid colon) and the rectum. But it can affect the entire colon. In general, the more of the colon that’s affected, the worse the symptoms will be.
The disease can affect people of any age. But most people who have it are diagnosed before the age of 30.
What causes ulcerative colitis?
Experts aren't sure what causes it. They think it might be caused by the immune system overreacting to normal bacteria in the digestive tract. Or other kinds of bacteria and viruses may cause it.
You are more likely to get ulcerative colitis if other people in your family have it.
What are the symptoms?
The main symptoms are: Belly pain or cramps. Diarrhea. Bleeding from the rectum. Some people also may have a fever, may not feel hungry, and may lose weight. In severe cases, people may have diarrhea 10 to 20 times a day.
The disease can also cause other problems, such as joint pain, eye problems, or liver disease.
In most people, the symptoms come and go. Some people go for months or years without symptoms (remission). Then they will have a flare-up. About 5 to 10 out of 100 people with ulcerative colitis have symptoms all the time.
1
How is ulcerative colitis diagnosed?
Doctors ask about the symptoms, do a physical exam, and do a number of tests. Testing can help the doctor rule out other problems that can cause similar symptoms, such as Crohn’s disease, irritable bowel syndrome, and diverticulitis.
Tests that may be done include: A colonoscopy. In this test, a doctor uses a thin, lighted tool to look at the inside of your entire colon. At the same time, the doctor may take a sample (biopsy) of the lining of the colon. Blood tests which look for infection or inflammation. Stool sample testing to look for blood, infection, and white blood cells.
How is it treated?
Ulcerative colitis affects everyone differently. Your doctor will help you find treatments that reduce your symptoms and help you avoid new flare-ups. If your symptoms are mild, you may only need to use over-the-counter medicines for diarrhea (such as Imodium). Talk to your doctor before you take these medicines. Many people need prescription medicines, such as aminosalicylates, steroid medicines, or other medicines that reduce the body's immune response. These medicines can stop or reduce symptoms and prevent flare-ups. Some people find that certain foods make their symptoms worse. If this happens to you, it makes sense to not eat those foods. But be sure to eat a healthy, varied diet to keep your weight up and to stay strong. If you have severe symptoms and medicines don't help, you may need surgery to remove your colon. Removing the colon cures ulcerative colitis. It also prevents colon cancer.
How will ulcerative colitis affect your life?
People who have ulcerative colitis for 8 years or longer also have a greater chance of getting colon cancer. The longer you have had ulcerative colitis, the greater your risk.
2 Talk to your doctor about your need for cancer screening.
These tests help find cancer early, when it is easier to treat.3 Ulcerative colitis can be hard to live with. During a flare-
up, it may seem like you are always running to the bathroom. This can be embarrassing. And it can take a toll on how you feel about yourself. Not knowing when the disease will strike next can be stressful. If you are having a hard time, seek support from family, friends, or a counselor. Or look for a support group. It can be a big help to talk to others who are coping with this disease.
30
INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY
Appendix E
School Demographics Information
31
INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY
Appendix F
Student Grit Survey (Partial)
32
INTEGRATIVE CASE STUDY
Appendix G
Multiple Intelligence and Learning Styles Survey
Your top three intelligences:
4.43 Self: You have a very good sense of self. You like to spend time by yourself and think things over. You will often take in information from another person, mull it over by yourself, and come back to that person later to discuss it. You like working on projects on your own. You often prefer to learn by trial and error. Effective techniques to enhance your learning include keeping a journal and giving yourself time to reflect on new ideas and information.
3.71 Logic/math:You enjoy exploring how things are related, and you like to understand how things work. You like mathematical concepts, puzzles and manipulative games. You are good at critical thinking.
3.71 Body Movement: You like to move, dance, wiggle, walk, and swim. You are likely good at sports, and you have good fine motor skills. You may enjoy taking things apart and putting them back together. Incorporating body movement into your learning will help you process and retain information better.
The scores for your other five intelligences:
3.71 3.57 3.29 2.86 2.57
Just because these five are not in your top three doesn’t mean you’re not strong in them. If your average score for any intelligence is above three, you’re probably using that intelligence quite often to help you learn. Take a look at the Practice section to see how to engage all your intelligences.