Integration & Test of Complex Programs · GPS / NAV TM / H&S / BIT ... Taxi test to verify proper...
Transcript of Integration & Test of Complex Programs · GPS / NAV TM / H&S / BIT ... Taxi test to verify proper...
11D-12-1807
www.dynetics.com
1D-12-1807
Barry KingDirector, Space Test & OperationsDynetics, [email protected]
Integration & Test of Complex Programs (Commercial Perspective)
33D-12-1807 3
Integration 101 Questions
Where are we in the Program Life cycle Pre-Phase A – Phase F
What are we doing? Objectives/Requirements – Needs, Goals, and Objectives (NGOs)
When are we doing it? Schedule/Resources
Who is doing it? Program, System, Elements
How are we doing it? System/Element Relationships
Work Breakdown Structure
Where are we doing it? (Design, Factory, SIL, Field)
44D-12-1807
Program Integration Road Map
Life Cycle Phases
Technical
Descriptions
Process
Pre-
Phase AConcept
Studies
Phase AConcept &
Technology
Development
Phase BPreliminary
Design &
Technology
Completion
Phase CFinal
Design &
Fabrication
Phase DSystem
Assembly,
Integration
Test, & Launch
Phase EOperations
&
Sustainment
Phase FCloseout
Key Decision
Points
Milestones
Guiding
Documentation
Major Events
Development, Verification, Test, Validation, Mission
KDP A KDP B KDP C KDP D KDP E KDP F
SRRMCR SDR PDR CDR SIR FRR
DoD
&
NASA
ORD, CRD, SEMP, SDD, IDD TEMP ITP/CEP
TRD
DAC Cycles
CONOPS
SEMP
66D-12-1807 6
Stakeholder Needs, Goals, and Objectives (NGOs)
Stakeholder NGO’s NGO Statement
NGO #1:
LV Class
To develop a launch system that delivers NLT XX lbm payload
NGO #2:
Ascent Options
To develop a launch system that provides multiple ascent target
options for the customers, including LEO, GTO, Polar-SSO
NGO #3:
Launch Site Flexibility
To develop a launch system that provides multiple launch site
options to the customers
NGO #4:
Responsiveness
To develop a launch system that is highly responsive to market
and customer needs – Launch turn around within XX hours
NGO #5:
Cost Ceiling
The program shall develop the system for less than $TBD
NGO #6:
Operability Date
The system shall achieve operability by the end of 20XX.
The NGO’s set the basis for answering the question of what we are trying to do!
It is the key starting point for a program and Level 1 requirements
99D-12-1807
Documentation Relationships
SEISEMP
V&V Plan
Requirements
Integrated Test Design
System Safety
CONOPs
Test Plans
Flight & Ground Operations
Missions sequences and checklists
Range Safety, Procedures and
Limitations
ITO
The SEI-ITO
Integration Link
These documents and relationships must be mapped early in the
program, and executed in the SEMP, TEMP, ITP, etc.
1111D-12-1807
Integrated Test & Verification Flow
Element
#1
Testing
Transport
to MOB
Transport to MOB
Run
IVT
Ground/Air
Fuel LV
Flight Day
Conduct FRR
Mate
Elements
Mate
Elements
Run
IVT
Mate
Elements
System
Level
Testing
Element
#2
Testing
LV
Element
Testing
Payload
Element
Testing
Run
IVT
Element Level Testing – Performed as subsystems
and components are integrated to verify compatibility
and functionality across interfaces. Planned and
executed by Elements
Integrated Verification Tests – Performed as elements
are integrated with other elements to verify compatibility
and functionality. Planned and executed by SEIT.
System Level Tests –
Performed to verify and validate
the fully integrated system.
Transport to MOB
1212D-12-1807
Top Level Interfaces
GHE/
GSE
Element
Launch
Vehicle
Aircraft
Launch
Vehicle Aircraft
Electrical Umbilical
Mech / Lifting
Elec / Simulator
Elec / Simulator / Umbi
Propulsion Systems check out - ?
GPS / NAV
TM / H&S / BIT
Commanding / Arm
Payload H&S / Commanding - ?
Mechanical / Umbilical
Layout / Path
Connector / Umbi De-Mate
Attach Points
Release Mechanism
Propulsion
Fuel Dump
H&S / Top Off - ?
RF
Command & Control
1313D-12-1807 13
Test Levels
Element Level Testing ELTs will be performed as subsystems and components are integrated to
verify compatibility and functionality across interfaces
Planned and executed by the Element SE&I with delivery and approval of
Acceptance Data Packages (ADPs)
Integrated Verification Tests IVTs will be performed as elements are integrated to verify compatibility
and functionality across interfaces
Planned and conducted by the System Integration and Test Group
System Level Testing (Integrated Flight Elements) SLTs will be performed to verify and validate the fully integrated system
Planned and conducted by the System Integration and Test Group
V&V Report will define the specific details needed to document the
data and analysis necessary to close out the requirement Traceable to requirements in Requirements Database
1414D-12-1807 14
System Level Integrated Testing
Integrated Ground Vibration Test Verifies modal response in a controlled ground test environment
Captive Carry Integration testing to collect vibration, loads and modal data in order to
verify predictions and models
Taxi test to verify proper functionality and range operations procedures
Integrated Range Test (IRT) Test functionality and compatibility with the range (ground or air)
Ensures all data interfaces, tracking systems (C, S and UHF), and
communications are compatible/operational prior to mission
Countdown Demonstration Test (CDT) Exercise the complete system on the ground through a controlled,
pre-planned sequence of events
ALS System and all Range assets operated in a realistic countdown scenario
Flight Demonstration Tests (FDTs) Dress rehearsal executing the entire range of expected flight and
contingency operations
1616D-12-1807
Mission CONOPS
Launch Site Selection
Primary operating base
Secondary locations
Polar/Equatorial orbit insertion
DRM Design and Trades
Stage impact
Debris footprint
NOTAMS and aircraft/ship traffic
International Law
Ground Station Placement
Portable TM Stations
Infrastructure
Data transmission and handling
Mission Timeline
Ground ops
Taxi/Takeoff
Cruise and TSP establish
Launch and ascent
Return to base
Contingency Planning
Abort – scrub
Fuel dump – jettison
Divert locations
Site surveys
Security
1717D-12-1807 17
Mission Phases
Mission CONOPS or Phases Must Be Considered During
Design and Development
1818D-12-1807 18
Keys To Success
In order to have a successful program, all levels of requirements
must be linked and verifiable along the way Analysis, model or test
Most common and impacting mistakes Not base lining and/or having fluid requirements
• Treat them like LCCs
The design team must include integration and test personnel
Letting design engineers be involved too long
Using 65% of the schedule for development and 35% for ITO
Discipline and completeness is achieved from experience and not just
from a process or procedure• Getting “help” in the wrong areas following a failure
• Lack of real program integration and execution experience
If you have not screwed it up at lest once, then you have no experience
• SE, Quality, Safety areas are not the program, they are aspects of the process
2020D-12-1807
SIL Approach & Critical Uses
Element Interfaces - The SIL is necessary to simulate/replicate the elements software and/or hardware functionality in order to verify the interface and performance specs early in the program and throughout the life cycle.
Element and/or System Interaction - The SIL software and hardware is necessary to simulate the interactions and mission profiles between the elements and the system as a whole, in order to train the individual operators and the entire flight operations team
Flight Software Test & Verification- The SIL tests and verifies in a configuration controlled environment, the software delivered by the element teams prior to certification and use in a flight operations environment
Fault Insertion & Data Reduction (FDIR) - The SIL software and hardware can/will manipulate system and subsystem inputs in order to observe and analyze the results, leading to the establishment of limits and launch commit criteria.