MDHE Performance Indicators Survey

Please return via email to: Erik.Anderson@dhe.mo.gov or he.research@dhe.mo.gov

Some sections may not be relevant to your institution.

Completed by:

Institution:

Date Completed:

Reporting Period:

Email:

Telephone:

Summarized results are displayed on the Summary tab and are aligned with the performance funding model's various categories. To update these tables:

1. Click anywhere inside the sheet and press Ctrl+Alt+F5 to refresh all PivotTables

2. Save the spreadsheet, including your institution's name somewhere in the title. Reopen from the saved location. PivotTables should automatically update.

If a test/assessment/instrument is not available in the drop-down list, please enter the full name of the assessment in the Manual Test Name column. Entries in this column are

not valid unless "MANUAL ENTRY" is selected from the drop-down list.

Assessment tabs are newly updated to better align with data required by the performance funding model. On each of the General Education, Major Fields, and Prof. Licensure &

Certification tabs, please select a previously listed/approved assessment from the drop-down lists in Column A. Then indicate the number of students in each category for the

reporting year. Please be sure to include the year on each row, otherwise the summary tables may not display properly.

The remaining data entry tabs are unchanged from 2011. Data from the "TeacherEd" tab will automatically be filled in on the "Prof. Licensure & Certification" tab after being

entered. This is necessary for inclusion in the summary tables and occurs on Line 50. These cells are locked.

Begin by selecting your institution from the list above and completing the remaining information.

Instructions

Shawn Cripe

State Fair Community College

10/6/2014

2013-2014

scripe@sfccmo.edu

660-596-7159

Please indicate the total number of undergraduate degrees awarded:

General Education

Reporting Year Total Number Who Took a Test Total Number Who Passed Percentage Passing

2014 636 499 78.5%

Major Fields

Reporting Year Total Number Who Took a Test Total Number Who Passed Percentage Passing

2014 113 83 73.5%

Licensure & Certification

Reporting Year Total Number Who Took a Test Total Number Who Passed Percentage Passing

2014 136 130 95.6%

Institution: State Fair Community College

Total Number of Degrees Awarded-FY 2014

- To update the tables to the left, click anywhere inside the sheet and press "Ctrl+Alt+F5."

- Alternatively, save the spreadsheet to your local disk and include the institution name in the file name. Opening the file from the saved location should automatically update the tables.

#REF!

Please indicate the number of students in the given column for each applicable test of general education. Please note the various degree levels.

Test Name

(Select From List of Approved Instruments)

Test Name

(Enter Manually) Year

Number of Certificate Students

Who Took the Test

Number of Certificate Students

Who Scored At or Above the 50th

Percentile/Passed

Number of Associate Students

Who Took the Test

Number of Associate Students

Who Scored At or Above the 50th

Percentile/Passed

Proficiency Profile (EEPP formerly MAPP) 2014 636 499

Institution: State Fair Community College

Please indicate the number of students in the given column for each applicable test in the major field. Please note the various degree levels.

Test Name

(Select From List of Approved Instruments)

Test Name

(Enter Manually)

Reporting Year

(2008 - 2014)

Number of Certificate Students

Who Took the Test

Number of Certificate Students

Who Scored At or Above the 50th

Percentile/Passed

Number of Associate Students

Who Took the Test

Number of Associate Students

Who Scored At or Above the 50th

Percentile/Passed

NOCTI-Accounting Basic #4000 2014 7 7

NOCTI-Automotive Technician Advanced #4008 2014 4 4

NOCTI - Automotive Tech 2014 2 0

NOCTI-CAD #4973 2014 3 2

BLDG Test Form MB1R-C Ramsay Corp. 2014 2 2

NOCTI-Criminal Justice #4081 2014 10 6

NOCTI-Early Childhood Education Advanced #4017 2014 11 8

NOCTI-Industrial Maintenance Mechanic #2074 & NOCT-Industrial Electricity #2050 2014 5 3

A*S*K Fundamentals of Business Concepts #8258 2014 35 29

PreVisor/Medical Office Administration 2014 2 2

NOCTI-Welding #4172 2014 10 5 4 3

TestOut Network Pro 2014 1 0

NOCTI-Computer Networking Fundamentals #4414 2014 9 6

NOCTI-Computer Repair Technology #4415 2014 1 0

NOCTI-Administrative Assisting #4101 2014 1 0

NOCTI-Administrative Assisting #4101 2014 5 5

Operating Engineer Entry Level Ramsay Corp. 2014 1 1

Institution: State Fair Community College

Please indicate the number of students in the given column for each applicable test required for professional licensure/employment. Please note the various degree levels.

Test Name

(Select From List of Approved Instruments)

Test Name

(Enter Manually)

Reporting Year

(2008 - 2014)

Number of Certificate Students

Who Took the Test

Number of Certificate Students

Who Scored At or Above the 50th

Percentile/Passed

Number of Associate Students

Who Took the Test

Number of Associate Students

Who Scored At or Above the 50th

Percentile/Passed

Nat. Board for Cert. in Occupational Therapy (NBCOT) 2014 11 11

Nat. Board Dental Hygiene Examination (NBDHE) 2014 11 11

American Registry of Radiologic Technologists (AART) Cert. Exam 2014 11 9

Nat. Council of State Boards of Nursing- NCLEX-PN 2014 50 50

Nat. Council of State Boards of Nursing- NCLEX-RN 2014 42 42

Exam for Certified Pharmacy Technicians (ExCPT) 2014 1 0

Certified Reliability Maintenance Technician (CMRT) 2014 10 7

Institution: State Fair Community College

Institution: Please Select From:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Fall Cohort

Subject Total A, B, C, and P

Grades in fall 1

Highest-level

Developmental

Courses

Total from Col 1

Who Enrolled in

Related College-level

Courses though fall 2

Total from Col 2

Who Completed

College-level Courses

with A, B, C, P, D,

and F Grades

Total from Col 3

Who Completed

College-level Courses

with A, B, C, and P

Grades

College-level Course

Retention Rate

College-level Course

Enrollee Success

Rate

College-level Course

Completer Success

Rate

2012 Math 335 257 236 183 92% 71% 78%

2012 Writing 235 144 133 106 92% 74% 80%

2011 Math 344 246 215 161 87% 65% 75%

2011 Writing 194 125 116 95 93% 76% 82%

2010 Math 322 259 220 185 85% 71% 84%

2010 Writing 277 194 174 148 90% 76% 85%

2009 Math 332 237 206 159 87% 67% 77%

2009 Writing 251 183 170 133 93% 73% 78%

Used for

Performance

Funding

Instructions

Column 1

Column 2

Column 3

Column 4

Column 5

Column 6

Column 7

NOTES

3. If your institution records + or - grades, include them in the letter grades with which they are associated (e.g. C+ grades would be reported with C grades).

Developmental/Remedial Student Retention and Success in First College Level Coursework

Total number of students who received A, B, C, and P grades in the highest level, credit developmental/remedial math and writing courses at the end of

the fall cohort year term.

Total number of students from Column 1 enrolled subsequently in related college level courses.

Total number of students from Column 2 who completed related college-level courses with A, B, C, D, P, and F grades within one subsequent academic

year, i.e. through the following fall. Totals in Column 3 should be less than totals in Column 2, unless there were no withdrawals

Total number of students from Column 3 who completed related college-level courses with A, B, C, and P grades within one subsequent academic year,

i.e. through the following fall. Totals in column 4 should be less than totals in Column 3, unless there were no D or F grades

Column 3/Column 2

Column 4/Column 2

Column 4/Column 3

1. Developmental/remedial courses are those defined by the reporting institution. Entries should include students who succeeded in developmental math and writing courses.

2. Related math and writing courses will most likely be college level math and English composition courses.

Institution: State Fair Community College

Please indicate your institutions methodology for assessing "Overall Satisfaction with Institution."

SSI Summary #2

Please indicate your institutions methodology for assessing "Satisfaction with Instruction."

SSI: 2Y - #18

Please indicate your institutions methodology for assessing "Satisfaction with Academic Advising."

SSI: (Will add question similar to NSSE, CCSSE, or COS)

Please indicate what cohort or sample your institution will use when reporting

2Y - Graduating Students

Comments

NSSE Took Survey Institution Mean Excellent Good Fair Poor

Overall Satisfaction

Academic Advising

Mean Benchmark Scores Took Survey LAC ACL SFI EEE SCE

Instruction

CCSSE Took Survey Institution Mean Excellent Good Fair Poor

Overall Satisfaction

Took Survey Institution Mean Very Somewhat Not-at-all

Academic Advising

Mean Benchmark Scores Took Survey LAC ACL SFI SE SCE

Instruction

COS Took Survey Institution Mean

Very

Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied

Very

Dissatisfied

Overall Satisfaction

Instruction

Academic Advising

SSI Took Survey Institution Mean

Not

Satisfied at

all

Not very

Satisfied

Somewhat

dissatisfied Neutral

Somewhat

Satisfied Satisfied

Very

Satisfied

Overall Satisfaction 547 7 Point Scale: 5.73 8 4 12 47 81 246 145

Instruction 547 7 Point Scale: 5.87 7 3 8 43 83 205 194

Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Category 5 Category 6 Category 7 Category 8 Category 9 Category 10

Overal Satisfaction

Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Category 5 Category 6 Category 7 Category 8 Category 9 Category 10

Instruction

Not

Satisfied at

Alll

Not Very

Satisfied

Somewhat

Dissatisfied Neutral

Somewhat

Satisfied Satisfied

Very

Satisfied Category 8 Category 9 Category 10

Academic Advising 547 7 Point Scale: 5.54 13 14 21 55 84 204 152

519; 95%

525; 96%

495; 90%

Other- Academic Advising Took Survey Institution Mean

Edit number and title of categories accordingly

Other- Overall Satisfaction Took Survey Institution Mean

Edit number and title of categories accordingly

Other- Instruction Took Survey Institution Mean

Edit number and title of categories accordingly

IFC Indicator: 1CA Results of student engagement and/or satisfaction surveys 1CA data collection will begin in Fall 2010. Reporting is optional in Fall 2010 and required beginning in Fall 2011 Methodology

Indicator will report on three dimensions of Student Satisfaction 1. Overall Satisfaction with Institution 2. Quality of Instruction 3. Quality of Academic Advising

Institutions will choose from among designated questions on selected instruments (see below).

Alternatively, a designated set of questions may be added by an institution to a self-designed or other national instrument (see below).

Sample and reporting will differ by sector.

Primary instrument options are NSSE, CSSE, ACT College Outcome Survey, and Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory.

Reporting Cohort/Sample

4 Year Institutions: Alternatives in order of preference 1. Students with 90 credit hours or more 2. Seniors 3. Graduating Students

2 Year Institutions 1. Graduating Students

Reporting Period

Institutions will report most recent data

Data must not be older than three years Reporting Elements

Population/Sample

Wording of question and instrument for collection (NSSE, CCSSE, COS, SSI, Other)

Any additional significant data collection and methodology information Indicators

Overall Satisfaction with Institution

NSSE: #13

"How would you evaluate your entire educational experience at this institution?

Response: 1-4; Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor

CCSSE: #27

"How would you evaluate your entire educational experience at this college?

Response: 1-4; Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor

COS Section 3; #39

"Indicate your level of satisfaction with—this college in general"

Response: 1-5 Including Neutral

SSI: Summary Questions; # 2

"Rate you overall satisfaction with your experience here thus far.

Response: 1-7 including Neutral

Other: Add question similar to COS, SSI, or NSSE/CCSSE

IFC Indicator: 1CA Results of student engagement and/or satisfaction surveys 1CA data collection will begin in Fall 2010. Reporting is optional in Fall 2010 and required beginning in Fall 2011 Methodology

Indicator will report on three dimensions of Student Satisfaction 1. Overall Satisfaction with Institution 2. Quality of Instruction 3. Quality of Academic Advising

Institutions will choose from among designated questions on selected instruments (see below).

Alternatively, a designated set of questions may be added by an institution to a self-designed or other national instrument (see below).

Sample and reporting will differ by sector.

Primary instrument options are NSSE, CSSE, ACT College Outcome Survey, and Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory.

Reporting Cohort/Sample

4 Year Institutions: Alternatives in order of preference 1. Students with 90 credit hours or more 2. Seniors 3. Graduating Students

2 Year Institutions 1. Graduating Students

Reporting Period

Institutions will report most recent data

Data must not be older than three years Reporting Elements

Population/Sample

Wording of question and instrument for collection (NSSE, CCSSE, COS, SSI, Other)

Any additional significant data collection and methodology information Indicators

Overall Satisfaction with Institution

NSSE: #13

"How would you evaluate your entire educational experience at this institution?

Response: 1-4; Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor

CCSSE: #27

"How would you evaluate your entire educational experience at this college?

Response: 1-4; Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor

COS Section 3; #39

"Indicate your level of satisfaction with—this college in general"

Response: 1-5 Including Neutral

SSI: Summary Questions; # 2

"Rate you overall satisfaction with your experience here thus far.

Response: 1-7 including Neutral

Other: Add question similar to COS, SSI, or NSSE/CCSSE

Instruction

NSSE: Add question similar to COS or SSI (NSSE Schools see note below

CCSSE: Add question similar to COS or SSI

COS Section 3, #2

"Indicate your level of satisfaction with…Quality of instruction"

Response: 1-5 including Neutral

SSI: 4Y: #58; 2Y:#18

"The quality of instruction I receive in most of my classes is excellent"

Response: 1-7 including Neutral

Other: Add question similar to COS or SSI

NSSE/CCSSE institutions may provide average scores for the 5 key Benchmarks: Academic Challenge (LAC), (Active and) Collaborative Learning (ACL), Student-Faculty Interaction (SFI), Enriching Educational Experiences (EEE)(NSSE), Student Effort (SE)(CCSSE) and Supportive Campus Environment (SCE).

Academic Advising

NSSE: #12

"Overall, how would you evaluate the quality of academic advising you have received at your institution?"

Response: 1-4; Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor

CCSSE: #13A

"How satisfied you are with the services …Academic advising/planning"

Response: 1-3; Very, Somewhat, Not at all (also N/A)

COS Section 3, #7

"Indicate your level of satisfaction with … Quality of academic advising"

SSI: Add question similar to NSSE, CCSSE, or COS

Other: Add question similar to NSSE, CCSSE, or COS

Reporting

1. Report institutional mean for each measure 2a. Report number and percentage of students who are not dissatisfied, for each category. For SSI, COS, and some

CCSSE this will be Neutral and above. For NSSE and CCSSE this will include Excellent, Good, and Fair. This has the problem of reconciling 4, 5, and 7 point scales which do not have equivalent response

categories. 2b. Report number and percentage of students for each category, at each level to MDHE. MDHE will perform

analysis for best presentation.

IFC Indicator: 1CA Results of student engagement and/or satisfaction surveys 1CA data collection will begin in Fall 2010. Reporting is optional in Fall 2010 and required beginning in Fall 2011 Methodology

Indicator will report on three dimensions of Student Satisfaction 1. Overall Satisfaction with Institution 2. Quality of Instruction 3. Quality of Academic Advising

Institutions will choose from among designated questions on selected instruments (see below).

Alternatively, a designated set of questions may be added by an institution to a self-designed or other national instrument (see below).

Sample and reporting will differ by sector.

Primary instrument options are NSSE, CSSE, ACT College Outcome Survey, and Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory.

Reporting Cohort/Sample

4 Year Institutions: Alternatives in order of preference 1. Students with 90 credit hours or more 2. Seniors 3. Graduating Students

2 Year Institutions 1. Graduating Students

Reporting Period

Institutions will report most recent data

Data must not be older than three years Reporting Elements

Population/Sample

Wording of question and instrument for collection (NSSE, CCSSE, COS, SSI, Other)

Any additional significant data collection and methodology information Indicators

Overall Satisfaction with Institution

NSSE: #13

"How would you evaluate your entire educational experience at this institution?

Response: 1-4; Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor

CCSSE: #27

"How would you evaluate your entire educational experience at this college?

Response: 1-4; Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor

COS Section 3; #39

"Indicate your level of satisfaction with—this college in general"

Response: 1-5 Including Neutral

SSI: Summary Questions; # 2

"Rate you overall satisfaction with your experience here thus far.

Response: 1-7 including Neutral

Other: Add question similar to COS, SSI, or NSSE/CCSSE

Instruction

NSSE: Add question similar to COS or SSI (NSSE Schools see note below

CCSSE: Add question similar to COS or SSI

COS Section 3, #2

"Indicate your level of satisfaction with…Quality of instruction"

Response: 1-5 including Neutral

SSI: 4Y: #58; 2Y:#18

"The quality of instruction I receive in most of my classes is excellent"

Response: 1-7 including Neutral

Other: Add question similar to COS or SSI

NSSE/CCSSE institutions may provide average scores for the 5 key Benchmarks: Academic Challenge (LAC), (Active and) Collaborative Learning (ACL), Student-Faculty Interaction (SFI), Enriching Educational Experiences (EEE)(NSSE), Student Effort (SE)(CCSSE) and Supportive Campus Environment (SCE).

Academic Advising

NSSE: #12

"Overall, how would you evaluate the quality of academic advising you have received at your institution?"

Response: 1-4; Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor

CCSSE: #13A

"How satisfied you are with the services …Academic advising/planning"

Response: 1-3; Very, Somewhat, Not at all (also N/A)

COS Section 3, #7

"Indicate your level of satisfaction with … Quality of academic advising"

SSI: Add question similar to NSSE, CCSSE, or COS

Other: Add question similar to NSSE, CCSSE, or COS

Reporting

1. Report institutional mean for each measure 2a. Report number and percentage of students who are not dissatisfied, for each category. For SSI, COS, and some

CCSSE this will be Neutral and above. For NSSE and CCSSE this will include Excellent, Good, and Fair. This has the problem of reconciling 4, 5, and 7 point scales which do not have equivalent response

categories. 2b. Report number and percentage of students for each category, at each level to MDHE. MDHE will perform

analysis for best presentation.