Instructional Focus for 2012-2013. The Northley Staff will be able to (SWBAT) identify a...
-
Upload
daisy-short -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Instructional Focus for 2012-2013. The Northley Staff will be able to (SWBAT) identify a...
Daily Learning Objective
Instructional Focus for 2012-2013
Daily Learning Objective
The Northley Staff will be able to
(SWBAT) identify a comprehensive Daily Learning Objective by Completing a PowerPoint handout.
The Daily Learning Objective… Is the first step in guiding a teacher in
lesson planning Should match the Agenda, Activities
and Strategies used in the lesson Focuses the student and teacher on
the task at hand
*Students must experience Rigor, Relevance, & Relationship daily in class. A complete daily learning objective addresses 2 of the 3 components.
Parts of the Daily Learning Objective
Thinking Skill ContentProduct
Common Myths
1. The Daily Learning Objective is the same as the PA common core standard
2. The Daily Learning Objective is the same as the agenda for the day
3. The Daily Learning Objective doesn’t need to be a complete sentence
4. The Product requires the student to write
5. All 3 parts aren’t necessary6. The thinking skill and the product must
be different
The Facts…
1. The Daily Learning Objective is NOT the same as the standard
2. The Daily Learning Objective is NOT the same as the agenda for the day
3. The Daily Learning Objective SHOULD read as a complete sentence
4. The product does NOT require the student to write
5. All 3 parts ARE necessary
6. The Thinking Skill and Product CAN be the same (especially in Math)
Activity Instructions
Read the Objective and determine if it is an “example” or a “non-example” of a Daily Learning Objective
EXAMPLE
SWBAT describe the effects of the Revolutionary War in a thinking map.
NON-EXAMPLE
SWBAT read textbook pages 3-10
NON-EXAMPLE
SWBAT take Notes after reading about ancient civilizations.
NON-EXAMPLE
SWBAT simplify expressions.
NON-EXAMPLE
SWBAT complete a thinking map on molecular structures.
EXAMPLE
SWBAT support their judgments related to political activism using evidence in think-pair-share.