Http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/44/Haeckel_Prosobranchia.jpg n.
Institutional Dimensions of Social Innovationsierc.massey.ac.nz/documents/research/Innovation...
Transcript of Institutional Dimensions of Social Innovationsierc.massey.ac.nz/documents/research/Innovation...
1
Dr Alex Nicholls MBA
University Lecturer in Social EntrepreneurshipUniversity of Oxford
Fellow of Harris Manchester College
Institutional Dimensions of Social Innovation
2
Definitions
3
Social Innovation
4
Social Innovation
New ideas that meet unmet social needs. And that work
Mulgan (2007)
5
Social Innovation
A novel solution to a social problem that is more effective, efficient, sustainable, or just than existing solutions and for
which the value created accrues primarily to society as a whole rather
than private individuals
Phills et al (2008)
6
Social Innovation
Social innovations are changes in the cultural, normative or regulative
structures (or classes) of society which enhance its collective power resources and improve its economic and social
performance
Heiscala (2007)
7
Social Innovation
• Social processes of innovation• Open source technologies: Linux• Creative commons: wikipedia• Co-production: Southwark Circle (Participle)
• Innovations that have a social focus• WISE model• Social Impact Bond• Smokeless cooking stoves
8
Social Innovation
• Incremental: Products and Services• To address identified market failures more effectively
• Negative externalities• Institutional voids
• Institutional: Markets• To reconfigure existing market structures and patterns
• Mobile telephony• Carbon trading• Fair Trade
• Disruptive: Systems• To change the cognitive frames of reference around
markets and issues• Social movements• Microfinance
9
Key Questions
• What contribution can social innovation make to solving the greatest challenges of our time?
• What is the role of:• Markets as sources of innovation, investment and
competition• Government as a regulator, policy maker and investor• Civil society as guardian of values and source of non-
market innovation
• And how do all three work creatively together?
10
Social Innovation
• ‘Wicked problems need clumsy solutions’• Social innovation blurs sector boundaries and
reconfigures relationships• Often disrupts ineffective or unjust systems• Requires entrepreneurship and intrapreneurship
• Institutional entrepreneurs are champions are critical• Government can generate, sponsor, or catalyse social
innovation
Economic Crisis
11
• Failure of perfect market theory• Huge government deficits
• Increased taxes/massive public sector cuts• Euro-zone crisis
• Volatile recovery of stock markets• Limited liquidity• High levels of personal debt• Increasing (youth) unemployment
• Job insecurity
• Tightening of retail sales
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP12
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP13
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP14
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP15
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP16
17
Welfare Reform
Britain needs a long wave of social innovation…this wave of social innovation will come from several
sources. Innovation in ideas and policies will be vital to underpin the values and philosophy of an active,
problem-solving welfare system. Organisational innovation will also be important, to create new institutions capable of delivering a new form of
welfare
Leadbeater (1997)
18
Political Drivers
• 1980s • Rise of neo-liberalism
• Free market deregulation/privatisation• Rolling back taxation and state provision
• Enterprise culture: ‘Reinventing Government’• Individualism/entrepreneurial revolution
• 1990s• New Public Management
• ‘Third Way’
• 2000s• New wave of welfare reform
• Quasi-markets• Austerity
19
Civil Society
• Growth in scope and influence of citizen sector• ‘Everyone a changemaker’
• Global connectedness• Web 2.0• Crowd-sourcing models
• Pro-Am culture• New localism• ‘Big Society’
• Disruptive innovation
20
21
Civil Society
22
Community
Private Sector Public Sector
Formal-InformalSocial Enterprises
Public-Private Partnerships
Shadow StateMulti-Sector
Collaborations
Hybridity
23
New Hybridities
• Markets• Impact investing• Islamic finance
• Products and Services• Co-production• BoP
• Supply chains and commissioning• ‘Shared value’
• Organizational structures• Restructured state• ‘New mutualism’ and social enterprise
24
The Big Idea, huh?
Haque (2010)
25
‘Thin’ v ‘Thick’ Value?
Industrial Era Capitalism Constructive Capitalism
How production, consumption and exchange happen
Value chainsUse resources
Value cyclesRenew resources
Which products and services are produced, consumed and exchange
Value propositionsCommand and control demand management
Value conversationsDemocratic demand management
Why production, consumption and exchange happen
StrategiesShort-term competitive advantage
PhilosophiesLong-term competitive advantage
Where and when production, consumption, and exchange happen
ProtectionDominating markets
CompletionCreating markets
What is produced, consumed and exchanged GoodsEfficient production
BettersHolistic production
New Market Opportunities
• ‘Bottom of the Pyramid’ sectors• Housing• Health• Education• (Micro-)Finance and mobile money• Frugal innovation
• New welfare markets• Developing country infrastructure in agriculture• Distributed utilities and energy• Lease/shared ownership models
26
27
A business with primarily social objectives whose surpluses are principally reinvested for that purpose in the business or the community, rather than being
driven by the need to maximise profit for shareholders and owners
DTI (2002)
‘Social Enterprise’
28
Key Characteristics
• Purpose is social/environmental• Vehicle is business• Generate earned income
• Not necessarily profitable• Create blended value
• Social + financial (accounting)• Agnostic about legal form
• Method not the means• Strong market orientation
• Performance measurement
29
Social Enterprise Models
• More efficient• Driven by competition
• More self reliant/independent• ‘Sustainable’?
• More scalable • Better access to capital
• More innovative• Hybrid synergies
• Investable
30
UK Social Enterprise ‘Stars’
31
• New market creation• Commissioning of contract services
• Social investment• Retail: Grants and debt• Wholesale: capitalizing intermediaries
• Fiscal measures• Regulation• Support/capacity building services• Research/piloting
Policy Approaches
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP32
33
New Labour Policy
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP34
SKOLL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP35
36
‘Big Society’
Cameron (2010)
Government needs to open up public services to new providers like charities, social
enterprises and private companies so we get more innovation, diversity and responsiveness
to public need
Health White Paper 2011
37
We aim to create the largest social enterprise sector in the world by increasing the freedoms of foundations trusts and giving NHS staff the
opportunity to have a greater say in the future of their organizations, including as employee-lead
social enterprises (NHS, 2011, p. 5)
38
Conservative Policy
UK Social (Policy) Innovation
• NHS/welfare restructuring• Builds on New Labour legacy• Key focus on mutuals and community organizations• ‘Big Society’?
• Welfare Co-Production• Southwark Circle
• Social investment• Strong policy interest and focus since 2000• > £1 billion direct investment
• Social Enterprise Investment Fund• Social Impact Bond• Big Society Capital
39
40
• Evidence of impact• Impact measurement systems
• Going to scale• Social investment
Challenges
41
• No widely accepted social performance measurement systems• SROI
• No good comparative data• Multiple legal forms and sectoral issues make
metrics a real challenge• Nature of metrics themselves is problematic
Evidence of Impact
42
• 2005 IFF Survey for Small Business Service and DTI• 15k SEs (IPS and CLGs); 1.2% of all enterprises; £18 billion t/o;
475k staff• Annual Small Business Survey 2005-7 for DTI
• 55k SEs with employees (62k in 2009); likely to exclude many charities and CLGs
• National Survey of Third Sector Organizations 2008-9, Ipsos/MORI for OTS (using Guidestar data)• 82k SEs (ie earning at least 25% of their income)
• NCVO Civil Society Almanack (charities only) 2009-10• 36k SEs (ie earning at least 25% of their income)
• ‘Hidden Social Enterprise’ (Delta Economics) 2010• ‘Businesses with a social purpose’ (inc. job creation)• 232k SEs (‘wanting to make a difference’)• 110k SES (‘wanting to make a social difference’); £17.7 billion t/o
Key Data Sources
43
• Microfinance and Fair Trade rare examples• 99% of SE is small and local• NB Co-operatives
• Many institutional factors make scaling difficult• SCALERS model• Competing in mainstream markets• Accessing investment
• Scaling what?• Impact?• Innovation? Models? Ideas?• Organizational size and reach?• Products? Services?• Importance of localisms and embededness
Going to Scale
44
• Market is fragmented and incomplete• Lack of liquidity/exit options• Lack of options offering (near) market returns
• Lack of demand-side absorptive capacity• Most SEs too small
• Investment performance data is patchy• Risk-return metrics problematic
Social Investment
45
Impact Investing
46
• London• £3m of funding• Support from Rockefeller and BSC• Website is live• Due for soft launch in 2013
• Singapore IIX• Support from Rockefeller Foundation and ADB• Impact Investment Shujog (2010)• Impact Partners (2011)• Impact Exchange (due 2013)
Social Stock Exchange
47
48
Social Innovation Fund
49
• Non-state social investment c. £192 million (2011)
• Demand for ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ capital: £500-700 million (2011-14)
• Demand for capacity building capital: £120 million (2011-14)
UK Social Investment
Grant Equity LoanPatient Capital Quasi Equity
Revenue generating
charity
Social Enterprise
Social Purpose Business
For Profit
Business
Grant fundedcharity
UK Social Finance Providers
Risk
Return
50
51
Big Society Capital
• Social investment wholesaler• Launched April 2012• £400m unclaimed assets + £200m from Merlin
Banks as equity
SKOLL CENTRE FOR 52
53
Market Innovation
54
SKOLL CENTRE FOR 55
56
58
Conclusions
• Social innovation is a fluid and sometimes ill-defined field• Its impacts are poorly understood and measured
• Increasingly institutionalized in markets and policy
• Scaling social innovation has challenges• Lack of investment• Resistance from vested interests
• Hybridity is key to addressing wicked problems• Can social innovation maintain its legitimacy
across boundaries over time?
59
London Riots 2011
60