Inspection Data Summary Report Prototype · Inspection Data Summary Report Prototype This is a...

Inspection Data Summary Report Prototype

This is a prototype of Ofsted's primary Inspection Data

Summary Report (IDSR). This will replace the previous

inspection dashboard. It shows the proposed layout and

content of the new IDSR. The data used is example data and

illustrative only.

The 2017 primary IDSR will be released in Analyse School

Performance in late October/early November.

Floor Coasting

Reading progress -1.1 (-5) (-2.5)

Writing progress 1.8 (-7) (-3.5)

Maths progress 2.5 (-5) (-2.5)

Below floor standards in 2017? No

School coasting as of (date) 2017? No

Coasting elements 2015 2016 2017

Example school URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567

Areas to investigate

Expected + Reading,

writing and mathematics71% (65%) (85%)

KS2 Reading progress for pupils with low prior attainment was significantly below average in 2017. All of these pupils had special educational needs. Low prior attainers have been in the bottom quintile for reading progress for the last three years.

KS2 middle prior attainers have been in the top quintile for mathematics progress for the last three years.

Phonics: for the last three years the percentage of pupils reaching the expected standard in Year 1 and by the end of Year 2 wasbelow national for all and disadvantaged pupils.

EYFS: for the last three years the percentage of pupils reaching the expected standard in mathematics, reading and writing was below the national.

EYFS: for the last three years the percentage of pupils reaching a good level of development has been below the national.

A school will be identified as coasting if its

performance falls below the definition for three consecutive years (see elements below).

To be above the floor, the school needs to meet

either the attainment or all of the progress element.

For coasting element year definitions see here.

School level trends

Bottom

20%

Top

20%

2015 2016 2017 Q5 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1

% girls

School 48 47 47

National 49 49 49

% of pupils known to be eligible for FSM

School 44 44 43

National 27 26 25

% of pupils first language not/believed not to be English

School 62 59 59

National 19 20 20

% of pupils with SEN support

School - 24.3 20.6

National - 13.0 12.1

% of pupils with a SEN statement or EHC plan

School - 2.5 2.1

National - 1.4 1.3

% stability

School 81 81 84

National 86 86 86

School deprivation indicator

School 0.5 0.5 0.3

National 0.2 0.2 0.2

Example school

This school has 19 of the 20 ethnic groups. Those with 5% or

more of the cohort are shown in the pie chart below.

URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567

Whole school context in 2017

2017 Quintile

Ethnicity

Any other White background,

32%

Black African, 17%Black Caribbean, 10%

any other mixed background, 9%

Any other ethnic group, 7%

White Brtish, 7%

Other, 18%

Phase of education: Primary Local authority: Bristol

Headteacher: Julie Smith Admissions policy: non selective

Pupils: 425 Ages: 4 - 11

Gender: Mixed Denomination: NA

Special needs provision: Visual impairment

Year group data% girls Nat % FSM Nat % EAL Nat % SEN Nat

Year 1 62 56 50 33 25 59 20 33 15 -

Year 2 51 41 50 43 25 55 19 28 14 -

Year 3 47 41 50 29 26 57 20 16 14 -

Year 4 60 52 50 47 25 62 19 20 14 -

Year 5 57 48 50 53 26 56 19 20 14 -

Year 6 51 43 50 60 26 62 19 23 15 1

Prior attainment

0

11.7

6.1

1.7

5.7

Reading Mathematics

Underlined once: more than one standard deviation from nationalUnderlined twice: more than two standard deviations from national

0

Year group context in 2017


Number on

roll

Writing

Difference from national (early learning goals) %

Number

of CLA

-0.7

-0.5

0.2

0.1

-0.6

-1.1

Year 6

Year 5

Year 4

Year 3

Year 2

Year 1

-1.2

-1.0

-0.2

0.1

-2.8

3.0

Year 6

Year 5

Year 4

Year 3

Year 2

Year 1Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Year 6 -0.7

-0.5

0.0

0.1

-5.3

8.3

Year 6

Year 5

Year 4

Year 3

Year 2

Year 1

Difference from national APS % pupils with no prior attainment

% pupils with no EYFS profile

Absence Persistent absence % sessions missed % pupils who missed 10% or more sessions

Cohort

National %

School % 6.4

8.8

361

School %

National %

Cohort

6.3

8.7

365

Key stage 2

Example schoolURN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567

4.6 3.9 4.1

3.9 4 3.9

- - 361

1

2

3

4

5

6

2015 2016 2017

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Perisitant absence 2016

Fixed term exclusions Permanent exclusions% of pupils excluded

Nat2016 (1)

2015 (1)

2

0.5 0.2

Key stage 2

Example school

School % 0.8 1.20.0

URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567

National % 0.5 0.2

5 2

0.9

01Number

4.3 0.2

1.1 0.5

5

0

1

2

2014 2015 2016

National

= 1 pupil

Key stage 2

separate keys for 2015 and 16/17 to reflect shading/sigs?

URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567

Trends over timeProgress quintiles displaying percentile rank

Q5* Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1* Q5* Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1* Q5* Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1*

2015 (30) 64 2015 (30) 28 2015 (30) 11

2016 (30) 55 2016 (30) 24 2016 (30) 22

2017 (30) 62 2017 (30) 21 2017 (30) 21

2015 (30) 89 2015 (30) 75 2015 (30) 77

2016 (30) 78 2016 (30) 79 2016 (30) 75

2017 (30) 84 2017 (30) 81 2017 (30) 73

2015 (30) 33 2015 (30) 21 2015 (30) 19

2016 (30) 24 2016 (30) 19 2016 (30) 11

2017 (30) 29 2017 (30) 8 2017 (30) 3

2015 (30) 58 2015 (30) 25 2015 (30) 25

2016 (30) 59 2016 (30) 19 2016 (30) 27

2017 (30) 57 2017 (30) 22 2017 (30) 25

2015 (30) 47 2015 (30) 59 2015 (30) 21

2016 (30) 59 2016 (30) 55 2016 (30) 29

2017 (30) 43 2017 (30) 37 2017 (30) 28

Note: 2015 quintiles and percentiles are based on value added meaures; 2016 and 2017 quintiles and percentiles are based on progress measures.

*Quintile 1 and 5 have a broader range of scores, see here for quintile boundaries

() Cohort

Disadvantaged

Significantly below national Significantly above national

---------------------------------------

---------------------------------------

---------------------------------------

---------------------------------------

---------------------------------------

---------------------------------------

---------------------------------------

---------------------------------------

---------------------------------------

---------------------------------------

---------------------------------------

---------------------------------------

---------------------------------------

---------------------------------------

---------------------------------------

---------------------------------------

---------------------------------------

---------------------------------------

---------------------------------------

---------------------------------------

---------------------------------------

---------------------------------------

---------------------------------------

---------------------------------------

---------------------------------------

---------------------------------------

---------------------------------------

---------------------------------------

--------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------

Middle at KS1

High at KS1

Overall

Low at KS1

Example school

Reading Writing

Bottom 20% Top 20% Bottom 20% Top 20% Bottom 20% Top 20%

Mathematics

Change in methodology or calculations

Reading progress Reading progress scatterplot

Bottom 10% Top 10%

Key stage 2

URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567Example school

All

Low at KS1

Middle at KS1

-1.6 0.0/0.5

High at KS1

Disadvantaged

1.2 0.0

0.5 0.0

-8.9 0.0 11

33

25

15

Number of

pupils

included

Progress National

-1.3 0.0 51

-15.0 -10.0 -5.0 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0

Ke

y S

tag

e 2

pro

gre

ss

Key Stage 1 prior attainment

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

0 5 10 15 20 25

Other national

Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other

Significantly above national and in top 10% Significantly below national and in bottom 10% Girls SEN = bold black borderBoys OtherDisadvantaged

Reading attainment Reading attainment scatterplot

School % National %

Key stage 2

Example school

Average

scaled

score

Diff no Cohort

URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567

Low at KS11 1 11

2All

72 66 51

18 18 11

11 19 -4 51

High at KS1

Disadvantaged

Middle at KS182 64

100 97

4 19/24

34 49

65 66/75

-5/-7 33

96

103

-1 15

-1/-3 33

0 15

103

2 9 -2 2595

25

96

4

0

0

0 20 40 60 80 100

0 20 40 60 80 100

Ke

y S

tag

e 2


70

75

80

85

90

95

100

105

110

115

120

0 5 10 15 20 25

National for all

pupils

Prior attainment

nationalOther nationalExpected+ %

High

standard %


Girls SEN = bold black borderBoys OtherDisadvantaged National

Writing (teacher assessment) progress Writing (teacher assessment) progress scatterplot

Bottom 10% Top 10%

Writing data is based on teacher assessments. Users should be cautious when using this data.

Key stage 2


Number of

pupils

included

NationalProgress

1.8 0.0 50

-5.6 0.0 26

3.7 0.0

3.2 0.0

32

10

1.1 0.0/0.6 14

All

Low at KS1

Middle at KS1

High at KS1

Disadvantaged

-15.00 -10.00 -5.00 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 Key Stage 1 prior attainment

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

0 5 10 15 20 25

Girls SEN = bold black borderBoys OtherDisadvantaged


Other national

Significantly below national and in bottom 10%Significantly above national and in top 10%

Ke

y S

tag

e 2

pro

gre

ss

URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567

Writing (teacher assessment) attainment Writing (teacher assessment) attainment scatterplot

School % National %

Writing data is based on teacher assessments. Users should be cautious when using this data.

Cohort

6

3

Diff no

Key stage 2

Example school

81 74 52

27 15 52

27 25 0 11

0 0 0 11

94 82 3 32

22 11 3 32

100 99 0 7

100 54 3 7

75 74/80 -1/-3 32

13 15/20 -1/-3 32

All

Low at KS1

Middle at KS1

High at KS1

Disadvantaged

0 20 40 60 80 100

0 20 40 60 80 100


70

75

80

85

90

95

100

105

110

115

120

0 5 10 15 20 25


National for all

pupils

Prior attainment


Greater depth

%

Ke

y S

tag

e 2


URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567

Mathematics progress

Bottom 10% Top 10%

2.5 0.0 49

Number of

pupils

included

NationalProgress

Key stage 2

Example school

Mathematics progress scatterplot

All

Low at KS1

Middle at KS1

High at KS1

Disadvantaged

26

1.9 0.0/0.5 31

-2.2 0.0 9

4.2 0.0

2.5 0.0 14

-15.00 -10.00 -5.00 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00


-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

0 5 10 15 20 25

Other national


Significantly above national and in top 10% Significantly below national and in bottom 10%

Ke

y S

tag

e 2

pro

gre

ss

Girls SEN = bold black borderBoys OtherDisadvantaged

URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567

Mathematics attainment Mathematics attainment scatterplot

School % National %

Key stage 2

Example school

0

Average

scaled

score

106.2

101.014 -1 9

0

Cohort

6All

83 70 52

25 17 4 52

Diff no

9Low at KS1

Middle at KS1

High at KS1

32

9

Disadvantaged

0

100 69 9

100 98 0

75 70/80 0/-1

0

106.116 8 2 32

108.189 51 3 9

32104.6

13 17/25 -2/-1 32

0 20 40 60 80 100

0 20 40 60 80 100


70

75

80

85

90

95

100

105

110

115

120

0 5 10 15 20 25Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other

National for all pupils

Prior attainment national

Other nationalExpected+ %High

standard %

Ke

y S

tag

e 2


URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567

English grammar, punctuation and spelling (EGPS)

15/16 15

10

16 14 26

18 18 14

16

1711 9

All

Low at KS1

Middle at KS1

High at KS1

92 73 32

23

22/26 32

Low at KS1

Middle at KS1

High at KS1

Disadvantaged

79 55 9

75 72/76 32

4 12 32

100 98 9

20

0 1 9

16Disadvantaged

9

22 52

Example school

National Cohort

Key stage 2

Spelling

% National Cohort Mark

All 16 15 5281 72 52

0 20 40 60 80 100

0 20 40 60 80 100

0 5 10 15 20

0 5 10 15 20




Other nationalExpected+ %Greaterdepth %



Other nationalAverage mark


URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567

Science

Science data is based on teacher assessments. Users should be cautious when using this data.

Key stage 2

All 85 81 52

% National Cohort

Example school

100 84 36

100 99 14

96 81/85 26

20 29 10

High at KS1

Disadvantaged

Low at KS1

Middle at KS1

0 20 40 60 80 100

0 20 40 60 80 100


National for all

pupils

Prior attainment

nationalOther national

Expected+ %

URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567

Reading

11

11

0

0

-3/-3

-3/-3

19

0

2

-2/-3

-3/-3

89

65

4

74

Emerging

Expected at EYFS

Exceeding at EYFS

Disadvantaged

85

Cohort

Key stage 1

Writing

National Cohort %

Overall68

22

Diff no

-9

-2

% Diff no

4

-2

Example school

National

68 65 208

12

94

16

0

Overall

Emerging at EYFS

Expected at EYFS

Exceeding at EYFS

Disadvantaged69 74/80 26

15 24/26

97

56

2

13

0

10

9

206

24 206

36 75

2 75

13/20 26

100 98 3

13 208

51 51 78

0 0 78

94

26

41 20 89

99 99 9

89 67 52 3

58 65/80 26

94

24 24 94

0 20 40 60 80 100

0 20 40 60 80 100

0 20 40 60 80 100

0 20 40 60 80 100









URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567

Mathematics

Key stage 1

Science

Cohort

82 208

Example school

NationalDiff no

-1

-2

% National Cohort %

90

36

Overall

Disadvantaged

72 73 208

16 18 208

54

3 2 65

Overall

Emerging at EYFS

Expected at EYFS

Exceeding at EYFS

6511

1

Disadvantaged8 18/20 26

-2/-4

-3/-3

93 86 109

10928 18 10

7

96 82/85 26

65 73/80 26

100 99 1

100 59 1

0

0

0 20 40 60 80 100

0 20 40 60 80 100

0 20 40 60 80 100

0 20 40 60 80 100

National for all pupils Other nationalExpected+ %



National for all

pupils

Prior attainment


Greaterdepth %

URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567

Phonics

Proportion meeting the expected standard

Year 1 By end of Year 2

Example school

%

National

Cohort

77

15

63

74

Key stage 1

2015 2016 2017 2015 2016

87

90

15

2017

15 10

87

90

12

62 64 84

91

%

National

Cohort

81

10

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

20

40

60

80

100

All pupils National All pupils National

URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567

Early Years Foundation Stage Profile

% good level of development Mathematics % expected +

Exceeding

51 53 32 20 61 62 35 30 55 46 32 31 % 63 58 31 30 67 63 32 33 61 54 35 36

69 69 32 31 76 76 33 33 75 75 35 35 National all 73 73 34 34 76 76 31 31 77 77 32 32

- 71 - 40 - 81 - 42 - 79 - 46 National other - 74 - 37 - 80 - 35 - 81 - 30

198 19 198 19 200 21 200 21 207 13 207 13 Cohort 198 19 198 19 21 200 21 207 207 13 207 13

Expected

2014 2015 2016

Key stage 1

2014 2015 2016

%

Expected Exceeding Expected

Example school

Exceeding

Cohort

National all

National other

ExceedingExpected Exceeding Expected Exceeding Expected

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

20

40

60

80

100

All pupils Disadvantaged National for all pupils Other national All pupils Disadvantaged National for all pupils Other national

URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567

Early Years Foundation Stage Profile

Reading % expected + Writing % expected +

56 52 30 32 61 62 31 32 58 54 35 34 54 53 34 33 59 48 31 30 58 46 31 29

74 74 26 26 76 76 27 27 77 77 29 29 67 67 35 35 71 71 36 36 73 73 38 38

- 75 - 26 - 79 - 40 - 82 - 41 - 76 - 40 - 75 - 40 - 79 - 41

198 19 198 19 200 21 200 21 207 13 207 13 198 19 198 19 200 21 200 21 207 13 207 13

Key stage 1

expected high expected high

Example school

highhighexpected

2014 2015 2016 2014 2015

expected high expected high expected

% %

2016

National all National all

Cohort

National other National other

Cohort

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

20

40

60

80

100

All pupils Disadvantaged National for all pupils Other national All pupils Disadvantaged National for all pupils Other national

Inspection Data Summary Report Prototype · Inspection Data Summary Report Prototype This is a...

Documents

Transcript of Inspection Data Summary Report Prototype · Inspection Data Summary Report Prototype This is a...