Inputs to create more value in education
-
Upload
frank-calberg-services -
Category
Education
-
view
927 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Inputs to create more value in education
9 inputs to createmore value in
education
# 1Start-off workshop with all participants
Financial advantages
When participants are involved and avoid the ”command”way of teaching / ”Frontalunterricht”, they learn more and consequently produce more value for customers of the companies, they work for.
# 2During the workshop,
participants stand, walk, and sit inside
and outside buildings
When participants stand up, they develop more ideasand come to better conclusions. Thereby, participants become more competent, and companies create more value for their customers.
Financial advantages
Source : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIAtlwwtQac
The number of ideas are increased
Source : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIAtlwwtQac
Better conclusions are reached
# 3Coach / helper / facilitator
brings moderation materialto workshop
Costs are reduced, as facility manager of facilities, whereseminars / workshops take place, avoid buying and organizing moderation material.
Financial advantages
# 4Further meetings on
initiative of eachparticipant
� When people take initiatives themselves, theylearn more and thereby create more value.
� Participants can reduce costs for transportation.
� Costs for use of rooms can be reduced.
� Costs for use of energy for rooms and means of transportation can be reduced.
Financial advantages
Students' self-governed and problem-solving activitiesare considered the focal point of a learning process.
Source :Dalsgaard, Christian: Social software: E-learning beyond learning management systems.http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2006/Christian_Dalsgaard.htm
We need to instil independent learning , make them feel that it’s their own responsibility.
Source : http://knowledge.insead.edu/leadership-UAE-education-100125.cfm
Sheikh Nahayan Mabarak Al NahayanUAE Minister of Higher Education and Scientific Research
Studies are designed in a way that they enable students to assume responsibilityfor their own learning.
SourcePrinciples for designing and arranging studies at Copenhagen Business School. http://frontpage.cbs.dk/ll/engelske%20tekster/Learning%20strategyWEB.pdf
Source : http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Motivating_people_Getting_beyond_money_2460
Opportunities to lead is more effectivethan any financial incentive
Source :Interview with Sir Ken Robinson.http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2009/feb/10/teaching-sats/print
Robinson believes the curriculum should be much more personalised .
“You can’t command people to be enthusiastic, creative and passionate.”
Gary Hamel
Source : http://blogs.wsj.com/management/2009/12/16/management’s-dirty-little-secret/
# 5Further meetings in
places decided by the individual participant
� Costs of rooms are reduced.
� Transportation costs for participants are reduced.
� Participants have more positive energy and therebythink better and more creatively, when theymeet at places they like to be / work at.
Financial advantages
More and more learning will take placeoutside the context of the educational system.
Source :Miller, Riel; Shapiro, Hanne & Hilding-Hamann, Knud Erik:School's Over: Learning Spaces in Europe in 2020: An Imagining Exercise on the Future of Learning http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC47412.pdf
Students are secured great flexibilitywith regards to where, how, when, andthe pace at which they learn.
SourcePrinciples for designing and arranging studies at Copenhagen Business School.http://frontpage.cbs.dk/ll/engelske%20tekster/Learning%20strategyWEB.pdf
Source : http://www.slideshare.net/moravec/toward-society-30-a-new-paradigm-for-21st-century-education-presentation
# 6Education based onintrinsic motivation
Financial advantages
� Costs for tests / control at the end of the educationprocess are reduced, for example costs for room, paper, controllers at tests, transportation, and energy.
� Costs for writing, printing, and distributing diplomasare reduced.
� As the most effective financial incentives are lesseffective than the best non-financial incentives, time / energy is invested better in other things thathelp people learn more and get more success.
Imagine a world where higher education doesn't end with a diploma, but starts at 18 and continues through life, as the world changes around us.
Sourcehttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/tara-lemmey/rethinking-higher-educati_b_387851.html
Current mental model: The teaching factory� Students are raw materials that need to be taught in order to
pass exams.� Classrooms are the primary physical environments for teaching.� Organization based on classes, subjects, and 45-minute time
slots.
Alternative mental model: The learning environment� Students are essential resources in the learning process.
They are in charge of their own learning process.� Learning takes place in a wide variety of environments inside
and outside the school.� The organizational unit is the individual student.
Learning pace, method, and content is individual.
Source : Kolind, Lars: The Second Cycle, p. 155-156.
Sourcehttp://www.faz.net/s/RubD16E1F55D21144C4AE3F9DDF52B6E1D9/Doc~ECFAF9EAF3BD645FFA043C3C4C9E14AB5~ATpl~Ecommon~Scontent.html
BMW-Personalvorstand:”Unsere Leute brauchen keine Karotte.”
Source : http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Motivating_people_Getting_beyond_money_2460
Financial incentives are less effective
# 7Continuous improvementthroughout the process
� Key in education is change, i.e. development of the waypeople think and do things. The better people are at learning new things, the more successful they will bein life.
� Focus on continuous improvement throughout the process help people get more positive energy and thereby perform better / learn more / create more valuefor themselves and others.
Financial advantages
“..we have to wave goodbye to the “knowledge economy”and say hello to the “creative economy.””
“What matters today is how fast a company can generate new insights and build new knowledge - of the sort that enhances customer value.”
Source : http://blogs.wsj.com/management/2009/12/16/management’s-dirty-little-secret/
Gary Hamel
“Most of those involved in universities’ use of web 2.0 nevertheless insist that institutions should not become overcautious. Universities should be risk-taking organisations. Learning is a risky process.”
SourceBrian Kelly is UK web focus at UKoln,the national centre of expertise in digital information management.Web 2.0: boone or bane for universities. http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2008/may/12/link
Source : http://www.bqf.org.uk/innovation/2010/01/01/new-years-greetings-to-innovators/
# 8Each participant pays
the coach / teacherwhat he/she estimatesthe education is worth
Financial advantages
� When participants, themselves, decide how much theywant to pay for education, they will pay the price theythink is right – and thereby be more satisfied.
� As participants themselves pay the coach/teacher,administration costs are reduced.
Sourcehttps://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Strategy/Strategic_Thinking/Reshaping_business_education_in_a_new_era_2500
“You’ve got to let the students run the school!”
Blair Sheppard, Dean of Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business.
0.00
Fixed pay for coach/facilitator/advisor/teacher:
� Each participant decides himself / herself how muchhe/she, and the company/companies he works for, wantsto pay the coach / facilitator / teacher. In other words, participants pay the price they think the education is worth.
� Each participant also decides himself / herself whetherto pay in cash and/or in products and/or services.
Variable pay for coach/facilitator/advisor/teacher:
http://www.slideshare.net/frankcalberg/how-are-people-paid-for-what-they-do
Further inputs on compensation
# 9Use of Web 2.0 technologies
� Participants save costs for transportation.
� Costs for rooms are reduced.
� Costs for energy are reduced.
� Each participant gets more individual benefit, becausehe/she can work/learn anytime and anywhere.
� Costs for software are reduced, as many Web 2.0technologies can be used with little or no costs.
Financial advantages
Research by Becta suggests that Web 2.0 technologiesare beneficial in helping to increase student engagementand participation, and to encourage online discussionoutside school . According to the research, they also helpto improve academic results .
Source :Becta shows benefit of Web 2.0 in the classroom. e-learning age, December/January 2009.
Undergraduate education is on the verge of a radical reordering. Colleges, like newspapers, will be torn apart by new ways of sharing information enabled by the Internet . The business model that sustained private U.S. colleges cannot survive.
Sourcehttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/11/AR2009091104312.html
Source : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iaXmAmj1nb8
”We need to develop the ability to teach each student in a different way that is tailored to the way their brain is wired to learn.
The only way that that can be done is if learning is accomplished by computer and by software rather thanby a teacher standing up in a monolithic mode. Computer based learning is much more customizableto individual students’ styles and paces of learning .
Clayton Christensen
Source : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gT2E2F0DmyE