Input Data
description
Transcript of Input Data
![Page 1: Input Data](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062812/5681643d550346895dd6090e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1Preliminary Design Review • Tucson, Arizona • August 29th – September 2nd, 2011Preliminary Design Review • Tucson, Arizona • August 29th – September 2nd, 2011
Data Management: Input Data
Prepared by: Simon KrughoffImSim Project: University of Washington
LSST Preliminary Design ReviewAugust 29-September 2, 2011
![Page 2: Input Data](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062812/5681643d550346895dd6090e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2Preliminary Design Review • Tucson, Arizona • August 29th – September 2nd, 2011
Input Data
Summary – Simulated Imagery
– Simulated operations– Simulated time variable sky– Atmosphere/Optics model
– CFHT Imagery– Camera design
– Focal plane layout– Electronic properties
– Calibration Products
![Page 3: Input Data](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062812/5681643d550346895dd6090e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3Preliminary Design Review • Tucson, Arizona • August 29th – September 2nd, 2011
Input Data: Simulated Imagery
− Simulated Observations– 10 years – ~3 Million
observations– Historical weather and
downtime– Filter and location
chosen to satisfy science programs
– Realistic slew, exposure, and shutter times
![Page 4: Input Data](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062812/5681643d550346895dd6090e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4Preliminary Design Review • Tucson, Arizona • August 29th – September 2nd, 2011
Input Data: Simulated Imagery
− Simulated Sky– Galactic structure model from
Juric et al. (2008), Amores & Lepine (2005), Schlegel, Finkbeiner, & Davis (1998)
– Solar system model from Grav et al. (2010)
– Extragalactic positions from White with semi-analytic properties from De Lucia
– Variable AGN/QSOs, Cepheids, RRLy, eclipsing binaries, AM CVn, microlensing events, M-dwarf flare
![Page 5: Input Data](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062812/5681643d550346895dd6090e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5Preliminary Design Review • Tucson, Arizona • August 29th – September 2nd, 2011
Input Data: Simulated Imagery
− Atmosphere/Optics Model – 6 moving screen model
normalized to seeing from OpSim with historical wind velocity
– Kolmogorov spectrum cloud model informed by historical cloud coverage data
– Full optical system model
![Page 6: Input Data](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062812/5681643d550346895dd6090e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6Preliminary Design Review • Tucson, Arizona • August 29th – September 2nd, 2011
Input Data: Simulated Imagery
![Page 7: Input Data](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062812/5681643d550346895dd6090e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7Preliminary Design Review • Tucson, Arizona • August 29th – September 2nd, 2011
CFHT Data
− ~19,000 MegaCam images– 23 May 2003 to 16 Feb
2008− 36 two amp CCDs in
rectangular grid− 1deg x 1deg fov− u*,g,r,i,z filters (note the u*
is broader than the LSST u)− Bias Frames− Flat Frames− Fringe Frames for i and z
images.
![Page 8: Input Data](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062812/5681643d550346895dd6090e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8Preliminary Design Review • Tucson, Arizona • August 29th – September 2nd, 2011
Camera and Electronics Model
− Focal plane layout– 189 imaging chips:
2000x2072 pix– 4 wavefront sensors– 21 3x3 rafts
− Electronic design– 8x2 Amps per chip– 509x1000 pix per amp
![Page 9: Input Data](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062812/5681643d550346895dd6090e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9Preliminary Design Review • Tucson, Arizona • August 29th – September 2nd, 2011
Calibration Products
− 10 realizations with 2 exposures per realization
− Reduced using DM stack to produce master calibration frames.
− Bias frames– zero length exposures
− Dark frames– 180 sec exposures with
shutter closed− Per filter flats
– Analytic fit to vignetting function sampled to place photons.