J.B. Ramsay, B. G. Craig and J. J. Dick- High-Temperature Shock Initiation of Explosives
INITIATION EVOLUTION CORONAL SHOCK...
Transcript of INITIATION EVOLUTION CORONAL SHOCK...
INITIATION AND EVOLUTIONOF
CORONAL SHOCK WAVES
B. Vršnak, T. Žic, S. Lulić(Hvar Obs.)
N. Muhr, A. Veronig, M. Temmer, I. Kienreich(Uni.-Graz)
This work has been supported in part by Croatian Scientific Foundation
under the project 6212 „Solar and Stellar Variability“ (SOLSTEL).
Observational signatures
� Type II radio bursts(Wild & McCready 1950, Aust.J.Phys. 3, 387)
� Moreton waves(Moreton & Ramsey 1960, PASP 72, 357)
KSO
EUV, SXR, He I, coronograph, radio,...
EIT/SoHO
Yohkoh
NRH
270
290
310
330
350
45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
151 MHz
164 MHz
237 MHz
327 MHz
Ha/EIT
t (min after 09:00 UT)
F
CME
b)
EIT/SoHOMLSO
Domain / Signature
Corona- radio type II- WL fronts, streamers
IP(radio, WL)
in situ
Low Corona(EUV)
Upper Chromosphere & TR(Hα, HeI, …)Moreton, disturbed filaments, …
timing, kinematics, intensity, spectral, morphology, …
Terminology
bowshock
pistonshock
blas
t-sho
ck
shoc
k
bow
-sho
ck
piston piston
< <> >Vp V0 Vp V
0
Vp > V0
Vsh >Vp
Vsh =Vp
Vsh >Vp
projectile
Large-amplitude wave (shock)
� impulsive plasma motion perpendicular to the magnetic field ("strong" acceleration)
� large amplitude wavefront is created� shock forms after certain time/distance due to the
nonlinear evolution of the perturbation (signal velocity
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0 1 2 3 4X-X0
U
nonlinear evolution of the perturbation (signal velocity depends on the amplitude!)
w(t) = w0 + k u(t)
k=4/3, w0=cs0 at β >> 1k=3/2, w0=vA0 at β << 1
u wu
w
vA0
xxf
0)( 23
0 =∂∂++
∂∂
x
uuv
t
u
Piston Mechanism (simulations)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3
v
t- amplitude growth + steepening � shock formation
- after t~0.15 ~const. amplitude/velocity
1D - planar
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0 0.1 0.2 0.3
x
t
wave
piston
2D - cylindrical
- amplitude growth + steepening � shock formation
- lower amplitude, formation of rarefaction region
- after t~0.08 decreasing amplitude/velocity
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0 0.1 0.2 0.3
x
t
dip
-0.2
0.2
0.6
1
1.4
0 0.1 0.2 0.3
v
t
2.5-D MHD simulation
BφBz By
+
β = 00.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1000000
10000000
0 0.2 0.4
rho(
y)
y
Ch
TR
Co
0.00.20.40.60.81.0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3
Bφφφφ
Bz
MHD simulation: Corona (horizonatal)
- steepening + ampl. increase � shock
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
x
t
0.2
0.1 0.080.1
0.2
0.3
0 0.05 0.1
x
t
piston
wave
- steepening + ampl. increase � shock
- deceleration; ampl. decrease
- corona/Moreton offset
- corona/Moreton delay
t
0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.5
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
w
t
0.2 0.10.08
piston
y = 0.012x - 0.098
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0 20 40 60
Vm
ax/V
A
B/B0
MHD simulation: Corona (above)
streamer (current sheet)
(reconnection outflow jet)
contactsurface
“standing” shock
fast-mode
standing shock
MHD simulation: Moreton wave
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
H (
km)
H analyt (X0=1.9)H num(B0=10)H analyt (X0=3.5)H num(B0=20)
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
v(k
m/s
)
V analyt (X0=1.9)V num(B0=10)V analyt (X0=3.5)V num(B0=20)
comparison with
analytical:
ρv2 w = const.;
cs = 10 km/s = const.
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
00 20 40 60 80 100 120
v(k
m/s
)
t (s)
V analyt (X0=1.9)V num(B0=10)V analyt (X0=3.5)V num(B0=20)
600
800
0 20 40 60 80 100 120t (s)
-5
0100012001400160018002000
H (km)
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
100012001400160018002000
X =
rho
/rho
0
H (km)
X (X0=1.9)X (X0=3.5)
Conclusion
� upward (type II burst) = driven bow/piston shock
� lateral (EUV, HeI, Hα) = temporary piston (“CME
overexpansion”)
� the time/distance of the shock formation and its
amplitude/speed depend strongly on the impulsiveness
of the pistonof the piston
� Moreton wave appears only if shock is sufficiently strong
(fast); only the upper chromosphere is affected
� downward propagating chromospheric disturbance is
quasi-longitudinal fast-mode shock that can be well
approximated by a sound shock
� Moreton wave lags behind the coronal wave due to
chromospheric inertia