Infrastructure Working Council (IWC) Presentations

© 2015 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Southern California EdisonEnergy Education Center-Irwindale

June 24, 2015

Infrastructure Working Council (IWC)

PresentationsDay One


DOE Plug-In Hybrid Medium-Duty Truck Demonstration and

Evaluation ProgramOverviewDan BowermasterProgram Manager

Electric [email protected]

(650) 855-8524

Infrastructure Working CouncilSCE, Irwindale, CA

June 24, 2015

2© 2015 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Program Objectives

• Nationwide demonstration and evaluation of approximately 280 medium duty PHEVs

• Develop a production-ready, commercializable PHEV system for Class 2 to Class 8 trucks

• Develop production –ready “smart charging” capability for the trucks

• Build customer familiarity• Use project results for system development to optimize

performance and reduce costs• Quantify performance attributes and environmental impact

All Program Objectives were met


Program Partners

• Department Of Energy (DOE)

• SCAQMD - Prime Recipient

• California Energy Commission - Funding Partner

• EPRI - Program Management and Fleet Coordination

• Odyne Systems, Inc.- Hybrid System Developer and Producer

• VIA Motors, Inc.- Hybrid System Developer and Producer

• Utility Industry and Companies


Project SummaryThe project has:• Designed, developed, validated, certified, and produced three

different plug-in hybrid vehicles • VIA Motors, Inc.- pickup-up trucks and vans• Odyne Systems, Inc.- Class 6 to 8 trucks

• Deploying 296 trucks• 52 VIA Vans• 125 VIA Pick-ups• 119 Odyne Class 6 to 8 trucks

• Collected and Analyzed Data from all trucks and provided data to the National Labs (NREL and INL) and will continue

• Developed and produced a Smart Charging System • Completed laboratory testing by Southern California Edison and

emissions testing • Program is officially complete on July 31, 2015


Fleet Deployment

64 different fleets in 23 States plus DC

20 VIA States 16 Odyne States + DC Total of 296 trucks and vans

119 Odyne trucks with 35 different fleets

177 VIA pickup trucks and vans with 47 different fleets

Final 90 VIA pickup trucks are being deployed currently


VIA Class 2 PHEV Pickup Truck

• Vehicle Design• Series hybrid system with automatic transmission• 4.3L gasoline V6 engine• 4x4 • High energy lithium-ion battery – A123 23 kWh• Blended regenerative braking• On-board charger (14.5 kW)• Charging-Level 1 (120 VAC) and Level 2 (240 VAC)• Reduces payload by about 850 lbs• Vehicle can drive without being charged• Extended Cab• Export power (14.5 kW, 120/240 VAC, 60 Hz)

• Expected Performance Specifications:• Up to 40 miles all-electric range• Up to 400 miles range between refills• Charge time less than 6 hours with Level 2• FMVSS compliant• Limited 8 years/150,000 mile warranty


VIA Class 2 PHEV Van

• Vehicle Design• Series hybrid system with automatic transmission• 4.8L gasoline V8 engine• RWD, 135” Wheelbase• High energy lithium-ion battery – A123 23 kWh• Blended regenerative braking• On-board charger (14.5 kW)• Charging-Level 1 (120 VAC) and Level 2 (240 VAC)• Reduces payload by about 600 lbs• Vehicle can drive without being charged• Cargo Van or 12 seat arrangement• Export power (14.5 kW, 120/240 VAC, 60 Hz)

• Expected Performance Specifications:• Up to 30 miles all-electric range• Up to 400 miles range between refills• Charge time less than 6 hours with Level 2• FMVSS compliant• Limited 8 year/150,000 mile warranty


VIA Deployment to the Fleets

Pick-ups, 125, 71%

Cargo Vans, 39, 22%

Passenger Vans, 8, 4%Accessible Vans, 5, 3%

Number of VIA Trucks by Type

Pickup trucks are the most popular VIA product


VIA Fuel Economy

PHEVs contribute to significant reductions in fuel consumption

Multiple Daily Charges will improve Fuel Economy

Data assumes only one charge per day

Economic Equivalent based on $2.77 per gallon and $0.055 per kWh


VIA Fuel Economy Improvements

VIA VtruxEconomic Equivalent Conv Vehicle

% Improvement

Battery Electric Range City Drive 47.6 miles ave. 126 MPG 13.6 MPG (20% idle) 826%(Charge Depleting) Highway Drive 47.5 miles ave. 126 MPG 22 MPG (0% idle) 473%

Fuel Economy City Drive 19.55 MPG ave. 13.6 MPG (20% idle) 44%(Charge Sustaining) Highway Drive 22.2 MPG ave. 22 MPG (0% idle) 1%Combined MPG Combined Average 102 MPG Equiv. 16.1 MPG 534%(70% City/30% Hwy) Assumes 18,000 miles annual

VIA VtruxEconomic Equivalent Conv Vehicle

% Improvement

Battery Electric Range City Drive 48.1 miles ave. 128 MPG 9 MPG (20% idle) 1322%(Charge Depleting) Highway Drive 48.2 miles ave. 128 MPG 16 MPG (0% idle) 700%Fuel Economy City Drive 16.55 MPG Ave. 9 MPG (20% idle) 84%(Charge Sustaining) Highway Drive 21.35 MPG Ave. 16 MPG (0% idle) 33%Combined MPG Combined Average 96 MPG Equiv. 11.1 MPG 765%(70% City/30% Hwy) Assumes 18,000 miles annual

VIA Current Assumption: Test was run at 45 mph city and 55 mph highway without cabin conditioning.

Real world results should reflect higher highway speeds and cabin conditioning.

Anticipated results given these two factors are 40 miles battery electric range

and probable 20% reduction in combined fuel economy from the reported test results.

Economic Equivalent based from $2.77 per gallon and $0.055 per kWh.

Weight 6655 Lbs / tires 245 @ 70 psi F 80 psi R

TRUCK (Crew Cab 4x4)Weight 6670 Lbs / tires 255 @ 35 psi

VAN (Cargo)


VIA Emissions Improvements15K Miles Annual Driving = 60 Miles/DayEV Range On Single Charge = 40 Miles

ELECTRIC MILESPER CHARGE

CHARGES PER DAY

EV DrivePercentage

(Charge Depleting)

Charge Sustain Mode

EMISSIONSIMPROVEMENT (vs CONVENTIONAL

VEHICLE)

40* 1 66% 34% 66%

40* 1.5 100% 0% 100%

PHEVs contribute to significant emissions reduction

VEHICLE CERTIFICATIONS

VIA VAN VIA TRUCK

CARB EXECUTIVE ORDER CERTIFICATION AUGUST 2014 MAY 2015

EPA FULL CERTIFICATION NOVEMBER 2014 JUNE 2015

* EV Range is real world city driving


Odyne Class 6-8 Trucks

•Vehicle Design • Odyne hybrid system with Allison automatic transmission • Diesel engine • High energy lithium-ion batteries- JCI 28.4 kWh • Blended regenerative braking • Launch assist • On-board charger (3.3 kW) • Charging-Level 1 (120 VAC) and Level 2 (240 VAC) • Export power (up to 12 kW, 120/240 VAC, 60 Hz) • Redundant system that can be returned to conventional driving • Vehicle can drive without being charged

•Expected Performance Specifications:• ePTO operation (>3 Hours with Engine-Off) • Up to 10 miles equivalent all-electric range • Up to 300 miles range between refills • Charge time less than 7 hours with Level 2 • FMVSS compliant • Limited 3 years/ 36,000 mile warranty


Buckets, 86, 72%

Walk-in Van, 13, 11%

Digger Derricks, 12, 10%

Compressor trucks, 5, 4%

Tanker Trucks, 3, 3%

Bucket trucks is the largest category of truck

Chassis Manufacturers

• Freightliner

• International

• Ford

• Kenworth

Final Stage Manufacturers

• Altec

• DUECO

• Terex

• Amthor

• Vanair

• Utilimaster

Odyne Deployment to the Fleets


Odyne Fuel Consumption Comparison

CILCC cycle used

Conventional Vehicle Odyne PHEV

Annual Savings

Annual Distance

Fuel Used (gal) Fuel Used (gal) Reduction (gal) (miles)Driving (50 miles per day) 7.8 5.4 32% 896 18000

Driving (32 miles per day) 5.0 2.7 47% 840 1152018000Driving (20 miles per day) 3.1 0.9 71% 803 7200

Mild Calibration Driving (32 miles per day) 5.3 4.9 7% 133 11520

Strong Calibration

Traction Fuel Consumption

PHEVs contribute to significant reductions in fuel consumption


Odyne Fuel Economy and Emissions The Odyne System provides 15-30% fuel

economy improvement while driving with Hybrid assist

When combined with the all-electric stationary use, the benefits can be much greater:

– Reduce Full Day fuel use by 50% or greater– Reduce Green House Gases by up to 50%

or greater– Reduces NOx by up to 80% or greater

Baseline Vehicle Odyne Mild Cal Odyne

Aggressive Cal

Driving(20 Miles/Day) 5.27 4.64 3.97ePT0 at jobsite(6.0 hours/day) 6.84 0.00 0Engine Charge (if Needed) 0 0 1.95

Work Day Total 12.11 4.64 5.92

Total Savings (gal.) 7.47 6.19

62% 51%

Fuel Use

PHEVs contribute to significant emissions reduction


Analytics All 296 vehicles are equipped with a Data Acquisition System that

collects data up to a 1 Hz rate The data is collected during the day and the data is sent to the server

dailyData Collected includes:

• Motor Current and Voltage

• Battery Current and Voltage

• Charger Current and Voltage

• Motor and Engine Torque and Speed

• Export Power Current and Voltage

• Odometer

• Vehicle Speed

• Accelerator/ Brake Pedal Position

• Fuel Used

• Charger Time

• Software and Calibration Level

• And many more


Odyne Analytics

The following reported data is based from: –71 Vehicles Reporting–47,350 miles driven over 2597 hours–4,377 jobsite hours


Single Shift Operation (with extended days)

Starts between 5:00-8:00 AM Driving and Stationary work interspersed

throughout the day Plug-in starts as early as noon but can

extend beyond midnight

Odyne Analytics – Typical VehicleDrive Time

Stationary Work

Composite

Start of Plug-in


Drive time: 1-3 hours– Average Distance: 22 miles– Average Speed: 18.2 MPH

Stationary Work : 0-6 hours Idle time: 0-6 hours Average time plugged in: 15.7 hours

Odyne Analytics – Typical DayDrive Time

Stationary Work

Composite

Idle Hours


Daily Parameters

• Driving Time: 1.1 hours

• ePTO Time: 5.5 hours

• Estimated Fuel Savings: 7.4 gal

• Idle Time: 1.8 hours

• Potential Fuel Savings: 9.0 gal

• Varying loads throughout day

• Ideal situation ending shift with low SOC

© 2015 Odyne Systems, LLC All rights reserved

Odyne Analytics – Large Aerial Example


• Utilized one engine charge.

• Opportunity charging during extended day.

• Extensive idling throughout the day.

Daily Parameters







Odyne Analytics – Digger Derrick Example


Daily Parameters:



• Generator time avoided: 5 hours





Odyne Analytics – Walk-in Van Example


Would you choose the PHEV truck as your main work truck going forward? (42 Operators: 32 Odyne, 10 VIA)

77%

23%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

YES NO

73%

27%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

YES NO

VIAOdyne

Survey Results

About 75% of participants prefer the PHEV over the conventional trucks


Together…Shaping the Future of Electricity


Technical Backup Slides


Minimally Intrusive Design

Traction Motor 300Volts

Hydraulic Pump

Power Take OffBell Housing Allows

Installation of Numerous Hydraulic Pumps


Odyne Hybrid Architecture

Stock Transmission

Stock Engine

Battery System

Electric Motor Charging

A/C & Heat

Electric PowerHydraulic

Pump

Work Equipment

PTO

Parallel Hybrid Solution Provides redundant system to

operator to minimize downtime Low validation and capital

equipment costs Ability to retrofit to existing

vehicles

OEM Compatible No modifications required to

drivetrain Simplified integration through power

take-off (PTO) EPA & CARB compliant

Patents Pending


Van Configuration

J1772 Charge Port

Electric PS Pump

Module

• Traction Motor/ Gearbox

• Fuel Tank

• Motor/Gen Inverters

HV Battery Pack and HVDB

Generator

Bi-directional Charger

Export Panel

Electric Oil Pumps

Electric Coolant Pump

Shifter Box

DC/DC Converter


VIA Vehicle Performance Test Protocol

EVSE Section Updatefor EPRI IWC, June 2015

SCE Energy Education Center Irwindale, CA 91702

June 24, 2015

About NEMA

“The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) is a federation of over 50 diverse product sections that are grouped into eight divisions.”

The EV charging infrastructure industry is servedby NEMA’s EVSE Section.

More about NEMA here: http://www.nema.org/About/Pages/default.aspx

NEMA EVSE Section Members(include …)

NEMA EVSE Section

CloudCloud

EV infrastructure landscape

6/16/15 5

EVSP #1

Utility Datacenter

EVSP #2

EV comms

WG Focus and Standards

• Network Roaming WG– Standards for “one credential, many networks”– Supports a variety of business arrangements– Multi‐part, extensible standard (initially UR, IAC, ID)

• Metering WG– Standards for conformance to NIST/NCWM codes

• HB44 and HB130 – EV Fueling / Method of Sale– Two applications: Commercial and Non‐Commercial

• Network Management WG– Standard for EVSE / network communications– Focus on North American market requirements– Two parts: protocol definition/profile, conformancy

Network Roaming (interfaces)

6/16/15 7

Network Roaming (roles)

Network Roaming (site)

Network Roaming (directory)

Network Roaming (detail)

6/16/15 11

1st of 2 slides

Commercial Metering Standard

Network Management Standard

Metering WG

• Standard for HB44 Device Type Evaluation– Accuracy, robustness, info (receipt) display and storage

• Advantages of “off‐board communications”– Data storage and retrieval (three years)– Support for Inspection (role‐based access, audit trail)

• Metering reading message format– Do existing management protocols suffice?– Are there other/ further requirements?

Network Management WG

• Goals for a protocol standard– Re‐use what we can, don’t reinvent or divert– Develop North American extensions/profile– Arrange for NA compliancy and certification

• Document use cases and requirements– Using OCPP 2.0 and eMI3 Standard as a basis

• NEMA invited OCA to establish a formal liaison– We’re engaged in serious discussions, encouraged

OCPP 2.0 Core and Regional Profiles

DeviceManagement (7)

Core (5)

Minimum Device Model (5.3)

FW Management (6)

Local ListMgmt (8) Pricing (9)

Smart Charging (11)

NEMASmart Charging

NEMADevice Management X

NEMAPricing

X

New NEMA Profile (not in OCPP 2.0)

Thank you very much!

Enquiries:[email protected][email protected]

Open Charge Alliance update

EPRI IWC meetingLos Angeles, June 24th & 25th 2015

Elaadnl is a Dutch Foundation dedicated to help set up a successful charging infrastructure in the Netherlands

Elaadnl‐ Dutch Foundation (non profit), founded in ‘09‐ Coordination on behalf of the Dutch Grid Operators

(7) and Dutch Transport System Operator‐ Installed 3,000 public charge points between ‘09–‘14‐ Knowledge and Innovation Centre for Charging

Infrastructure

Focus areas‐ Smart Charging‐ Simplification of Grid Operator procedures &

requirements‐ Interoperability & Standardization: Open Charge

Point Protocol (OCPP)

EV’s in the Netherlands‐ 47.000 EV’s (0,6%)‐ Target by Dutch Government is

200.000 by ‘20

Charging Infrastructure‐ Private: 30.000‐ Semi Public: 7.600‐ Public (24/7): 6.500‐ Target for Public Charging

Stations: 70.000 by ‘20

Network Operator

Network Operator

Network Operator

What are the benefits of an open protocol for EVSE to back office system communication?

Asset Owner / Site owner

1

23 EVSE manufacturers can

integrate more easily with multiple Network Operators

Network Operators can integrate more easily with multiple brands of EVSE’s

Asset owners (utilities, municipalities, private companies) can migrate from one Network Operator to another more easily whilst keeping EVSE’s operational

Original Back office systemVendor 1

New Back Office SystemVendor 2

Theory into practice: in 2014 ElaadNL successfully switched to a new Back Office system

7 different EVSE suppliers operational Sourced through 3 different tenders

In 2014 ElaadNL switched to a new Back Office System to reduce operational cost All EVSE’s had OCPP implemented and could be easily migrated to the new Back office

System

Elaad founded the Open Charge Alliance (OCA) to develop the Open Charge Point Protocol (OCPP) together with many stakeholders

OCA‐ A non‐profit organization‐ Founded in January 2014‐ 55 members currently‐ Everyone is welcome to join

OCA activities‐ Development of the OCPP protocol‐ Development of compliancy testing and

certification‐ Promotion of OCPP

‐ ElaadNL initiated the development of an open protocol, and many companies and countries joined the effort

‐ First releases in 2010‐2013

‐ Managing and developing the OCPP within an International Alliance was seen as the way forward

OCPP

UtilityE‐mobilityService Provider

Charge point

Operator

EVSE manufacturer

122

4

78

23

The diversity of the OCA members helps to develop a standard protocol that meets everybody's needs

OCA members (55 dd. June ‘15)

Members from 16 different countries

EuropeAsiaMiddle EastNorth AmericaSouth America

Small, medium and large sized companies

Small (<1mln)

Medium (1‐10mln)

Large (>10mln)

Members covering all parts of the Charging Infrastructure ecosystem

# of members

Consultancy / Knowledge Institute: 17

Network Operator

OCPP content and development roadmap

1.2 1.5 1.6

August ‘15 ‘16‘13‘10

General corrections Additional support for JSON over web sockets

Smart Charging added Enhanced Security

RestructuredPricing addedIEC/ISO 15118 supportEnhanced monitoring & controlFurther alignment with Standards for Demand response

Improved spec

2.0

First release SOAP

OCPP 1.6 description

Core Profile (15)

Firmware Management (4)

Device Management (2)

Local List Management (2)

Reservation (2)

Smart Charging (3)

Protocol Specification

(1.6)

SOAPImplementation

Guide

WSDLJSON

schema

Compliancy toolkit

&

&

&

Content Documentation

JSONImplementation

Guide

Starting with the 1.6 release, OCA will provide Compliancy Test tools and a formal Certification procedure

‐ Provide compliancy test tools for self testing‐ Develop a path to formal third party certification‐ Administer an OCA trademark for OCPP conformance

‐ Available for 1.6 and subsequent releases‐ Conformance tool for self testing released end 2015‐ Formal Certification mid 2016

The OCA is planning towards SDO affiliation(s)

There are several good candidatesThe OCA recognizes the benefits of a standard within an official SDO

The OCA is planning towards an SDO affiliation, keeping in mind that:

OCA will continue to support as Interoperability and Testing Authority

Expedited development of the standard All stakeholders in the Charging Infrastructure Ecosystem

should be able to contribute IP and royalty free

Alignment with standards upstream and downstream Wide reach Methods tried and tested to making and maintaining

good standards

• Global reach• National committees with

public/private members

• Global reach• Community of technical

experts

• Open Standards for the Information Society

• Public/private members

……………….and more

OCPP 2.0 and SDO release will be aligned with standards upstream anddownstream

Demand Response

The OCA is further developing OCPP according to market demand

OCPP 2.0 release SDO submission candidate

Core

Pricing Smart Charging

Monitoring & control

Modular approach: Makes the specification more comprehensible Allows for flexible use in various markets

CIOOCPP 15118

Join OCA!

And help to advance electric vehicle adoption and lower system‐wide costs

[email protected]

Electric Vehicle Grid Integration Pilot Program Proposal

© 2011San Diego Gas & Electric Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved.

June 24, 2015

EPRI–IWC Irwindale, CA JC Martin – San Diego Gas & Electric

2

Create an excellent customer experience and accelerate the growth of electric transportation by ensuring the safe, reliable and efficient integration of EV loads with the grid

• Technology

• Pricing

• Innovation

• Education

SDG&E Goal – Grid-Integrated Charging

• More plug-in electric vehicles • More zero emission miles driven per EV

10

California EV Environment

• Almost 40% of CA’s greenhouse gas emissions come from transportation

• CA Governor Jerry Brown’s “Zero Emission Vehicle Action Plan”

– By 2020 – Grid-integrated charging infrastructure to support 1 million ZEVs

– By 2025 – 1.5 million ZEVs CA roadways

– Helps meet AB32 to restore greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020

– “Drive the Dream” commitment to workplace charging

• DOE launched Workplace Charging Challenge – SDG&E is a partner

– Achieve a tenfold increase in U.S. employers offering workplace charging in 5 years (2018)

• >33% renewable energy resource mix by 2020

5

SDG&E Renewable Energy Portfolio

* Capacity values are nameplate

5% 5%

6% 6% 6%

10%

12%

21% 20%

24%

32%

2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 4% 4%

5% 6%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014* 2015* 2016* 2017* 2018*

SDG&E RPS %

US Average

SDG&E expects to be above 33% renewables in 2015, 5 years ahead of schedule, and we view the current RPS mandate as a floor not a ceiling.

2

5

CA Intermittent Resources Lead to Duck Chart

San Diego Regional EV Growth

April 30, 2015

• 16,730 EVs (57% BEV)

• 900 public charging stations (328 locations)

• 60 DC fast-chargers (7 in progress)

• 400 All-electric Car2Go fleet

• 5,658 on SDG&E EV time-of-use rates (34%)

6

Electric Vehicle-Grid Integration Pilot Proposal

• Installs charging in multi-family communities and work places

– Best opportunity for grid-integrated charging due to long parking durations

• Give EV customers access to charging at the best price possible

• Introduce an hourly rate and EV charging infrastructure to efficiently integrate and manage charging loads with the grid

• 550 facilities with 10 chargers each over 5 years (5,500 chargers)

• To greatest extent possible, use third parties to operate and maintain charging system

• EV charging is billed to drivers’ SDG&E bill

11

EVGI Benefits All Customers

• Reduces harmful air emissions from gasoline and diesel fuels

• Reduces on-peak charging and the need to build system capacity

• Helps charge EVs when energy is low cost and supply is plentiful, such as renewable energy resources

• Increase EV sales/leases and reduces risk of market stalling

• Doubles zero-emission miles for plug-in hybrids

• Creates jobs and attracts EV related businesses to the region

• Educates customers about dynamic pricing

• Provides data to guide EV policy

• Stepping-stone toward “Vehicle-to-Grid”

• Increases US energy independence

14

Electric Vehicle-Grid Integration Proposed VGI Rate

13

Dynamic Day-Ahead Hourly rate…

Electric Vehicle-Grid Integration User App Example

13

Electric Vehicle-Grid Integration Settlement Agreement

• Settlement Agreement filed with the CPUC on June 3

• Settling Parties:

– Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), Sierra Club, CA Coalition of Utility Employees, Greenlining Institute, ChargePoint, NRG EV Services, Siemens, Plug in America, General Motors, Honda Motors, Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, KN Grid, CALSTART, Center for Sustainable Energy (CSE), Green Power Institute and SDG&E

12

Electric Vehicle-Grid Integration Settlement Agreement

• Settlement Agreement Modifications:

– VGI Rate to Host option with a load management plan

– Disadvantaged communities commitment

– Clarification re choice of vendors and services (that was in the original but the Rate to Host option created more value added service opportunity)

– Clarification on the DBE goals

– Program Advisory Council (includes local stakeholder representation)

– Site Hosts can switch rate plan-billing option after one year

13

Regulatory Update

2014

• April 11 – Application filed

• Dec. 18 – Decision on utility role in EVSE ownership

2015

• Jan 14 – Supplemental testimony filed – in response to Dec 2014 Decision

• March 16 – Intervenor testimony filed

• April 13 – Rebuttal testimony filed

• April 27 – May 5 – Hearings

• June 3 – Settlement Agreement filed (supported by approximately 15 diverse organizations)

• Q4 – CPUC decision (anticipated)

18

EDISON INTERNATIONAL®0

“Charge Ready” Program Application

Megan Mao

June 24, 2015


Charge Ready Program Benefits

.

– Electrification of the transportation sector is essential to realizing California’s bold climate and air quality goals; Urgent action is needed now to achieve goal of 1.5M zero-emission vehicles on California roads by 2025

• SCE’s temporary program provides an early boost to this emerging market by addressing a main barrier to EV adoption

• The program seeks to substantially increase charging capacity and availability in key market segments

– EVs are uniquely flexible loads and, coupled with demand response, may increase system reliability

– Air quality (pollution reduction) and GHG reduction benefits will accrue to ratepayers and entire community at large

– Potential downward pressure on rates for SCE customers due to improving system utilization

– Disadvantaged communities are expected to benefit from an expanded EV market


Elements Description

Scope and Duration

• Install and rate base infrastructure* to serve EV chargers at long dwell-time locations Seek approval of one-year pilot to deploy up to 1,500 chargers while

conducting Market Education & Outreach efforts Second phase over four years would include remaining chargers, for

a total of 30,000 across both phases

Costs Total estimated costs of Charge Ready and ME&O: $342M capital; $13M expense

Pilot Phase: $22M ($18M capital; $4M expense) Phase 2: $333M ($324M capital; $9M expense)

EV Chargers • Level 1 or Level 2 chargers pre-qualified by SCE; all Level 2 chargers must have DR capability

• SCE conducts RFIs every 12-18 months to qualify new equipment/vendors and evaluate base cost; interim quarterly qualification process for EV chargers only

• Deployment per site: 10 chargers minimum, up to 4% of parking spaces

Key Features in the Charge Ready Program Application

*Includes new transformer (as needed), service, meter, and customer infrastructure (panel, conduit, wiring, etc.), all dedicated


Elements Description

Market Education& Outreach

Include request for broad EV market education and outreach (ME&O) : Awareness campaign about EVs and the benefits of fueling from

the grid Transportation electrification advisory services for business

customers

Ownership &Operation

• Participants own chargers (all other infrastructure owned by SCE)• Participants operate chargers and are responsible for related costs

(maintenance, network, etc.)• Participants must agree to join future DR programs for managing EV load

Disadvantaged Communities

• Charge Ready deployment: Target 10% of installations in disadvantaged communities Minimum installations reduced to 5 chargers per site, as needed

• Targeted education and outreach: Seek to partner with other organizations (e.g., Calstart, LAEDC) Follow state incentives and grants supporting electric

transportation for business customers in disadvantaged communities

Key Features in the Charge Ready Program Application (Continued)


Illustration of Charge Ready Installation


Charge Ready – Procedural Status Update

• On October 30, 2014, SCE filed its application with the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) requesting approval of the Charge Ready and Market Education Programs:

– Phase 1/Pilot: Up to 1,500 EV chargers over 12 months following CPUC approval

– Phase 2: Following Phase 1, up to 28,500 EV chargers, for 48 months

– Market, Education & Outreach efforts throughout both phases

• On March 7, 2015, CPUC issued a scoping memo, which identifies topics to be considered with respect to Phase 1, such as:

– Scope and scale of the proposed project

– Program eligibility and participation requirements

– Amount and accounting treatment of rebates

– Marketing, education, and outreach

– Competitive issues (e.g., whether Charge Ready will stimulate or inhibit competition and market investment)

• The CPUC has directed SCE not to engage in outreach to enroll or enlist customers in the Charge Ready Program while the application is pending


Charge Ready Scoping Memo Schedule

EVENT DATES(with hearings)

DATES(without hearings)

Intervenor Testimony served

May 15, 2015 May 15, 2015

Rebuttal Testimony served June 5, 2015 June 5, 2015

Cross-examination issues, time estimates, and witness order

June 12, 2015 NA

Evidentiary Hearings June 22-26, 2015 NA

Opening Briefs filed July 17, 2015 June 26, 2015

Reply Briefs filed July 31, 2015 July 10, 2015

Phase 1 Proposed Decision November/December 2015 October/November 2015

Phase 1 decision anticipated 4th Quarter 2015

KCP&L Clean Charge Network

1

Program Goals Install, operate, and maintain 1000+ L2 charging stations and

15+ DC fast charge stations at approx. 300 locations throughout our territory

An integrated electric vehicle infrastructure– Standardized communication and billing platform across territory– Grid optimization and planning to optimized to serve our customers

where charging stations are needed– Create a platform that allows for further product and service solutions

including DSM and Dynamic Pricing Programs

Partner with C&I customers to host “charge at work programs” and retail driver charging

2

Key Dates – Progress to Date

Launched January 26th with favorable press/industry/community support Launch included branding activities

Kansas Rate Case True‐up: March 31st

36 L2 charging stations and 6 DC (L3) installed by March 31st across 15 different locations.

Missouri Rate Case True‐up: May 31st

26 Level 2 stations in service across 10 locations and 5 DC stations.

200 Additional stations across 94 locations with signed contracts on the schedule

3

Strategy The vast majority will be Level 2 charging

stations with some Level 3 (DC fast charge) stations

Installed in groups of 3‐5 stations with ports for up to 10 vehicles

Designed as utility infrastructure Focus on publicly accessible, high population

density / long dwell time areas, workplaces and geographic dispersion

Completely free to host companies except for first two years electricity use

4

Where we are installing

5

Workplace – 38%Recreational (Govt) – 15%Retail – 23%Services – 10%Education ‐ 15%

A Complex Process that Centers Around the Customer

6

Critical Path:1. Host

Agreement2. Permitting

Customer Outreach

Goals– Achieve awareness of the KCP&L Clean Charge Network – Help foster adoption of electric vehicles in the Kansas City region

Key Messages– Help us shape the network– Making range anxiety disappear– We’re ahead of the charge

7

Customer Outreach – Future Development

8

Where we’re going– Develop the driver experience

– Awareness‐building campaigns/events

– Portal adoption– Thought leadership in the industry

Lessons LearnedStrategy Issue/Discussion

Tier 1 focus Biggest customers may not be the best customers (long contract approval time, branding demands)

City support They want stations; just not host costs or parking spot allocations

Permitting Every city is different some required city council meetings, host agreement review, landscaping, ADA requirements

Standard design There is no standard design! Prepare for inventory needs

Locations, all are welcome

First hosts were rejected due to their stringent requirements; eased up on restrictions to accommodate volume needs

Pilots are good Internal/external stakeholders prefer pilot; time to identify reporting

Host contracts Is there ever an easy process when we have legal involved?

Naming standards Ensure customer friendly (construction, Charge Point display)

Research There is so much to learn, partner with EPRI!

9

What do we Measure the Value?

1. Beneficial, smart load and grid utilization, how do we prove the value of this?

2. Environmental, what are we taking off the grid in terms of emissions and can we value that?

3. The size and scale we deployed…this should be managed as infrastructure of a utility?

4. Economic development: what is the value on the street?5. What customer programs will provide value (DR, dynamic

pricing) and when do we need to launch those?6. What is the growth of EV’s in the area (baseline and proven

impact of this program)?

10

What’s next

Currently reviewing the queue of 400 stations Discovering location gaps Moving beyond Tier 1

– National retail chains (Walmart, Kohls, Target, Home Depot, Lowes)– Apartment Complexes (ApartmentLink)– Workplace focus (for employees only)– Low‐income – Economic Development (hotels)

Communication Plan Continue work on after hour support model Keep up with contracts/paperwork/documentation

11

ENERGY STAR®

Product Development: Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE)

EPRI IWCJune 24, 2015

Verena RadulovicENERGY STAR Product ManagerU.S. EPA

2

• Voluntary climate protection partnership with the U.S. EPA since 1992

• Strategic approach to energy management, promoting energy efficient products and practices

• Tools and resources to help save money and protect the environment

• To date, ENERGY STAR has prevented 2 billion metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions and saved $300 billion on utility bills

EPA’s ENERGY STAR identifies the most energy-efficient products, buildings, plants, and new homes – all based on the latest government-backed standards.

Today, every ENERGY STAR label is verified by a rigorous third-party certification process.

4

5

LightingCFLsSSL

Integral LED lampsResidential light

fixtures

Home EnvelopeRoof productsWindows/Doors

Heating &Cooling

Central ACHeat pumps

BoilersFurnacesCeiling fansRoom AC

Ventilating fansWater Heaters

Office EquipmentComputers*Monitors*Printers*Copiers*Scanners*

Fax machines*Multi‐function

Devices*Servers*UPS

CommercialFood ServiceDishwashersRefrigeratorsFreezers

Ice MachinesFryers

SteamersHot Food Holding Cabinets

GriddlesOvensVending machines

AppliancesClothes washersDishwashersRefrigeratorsDehumidifiersAir cleanersWater coolers

Home Electronics

Cordless phonesTV

Set Top boxesHome audio

* = Covered by EU agreement

OtherPool Pumps

6

Greenhouse savings by product category

Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE)

7

• EPA scoping report published in 2014.• Level 1 and 2 EVSE (Slow Chargers): projected to grow to 85,000 Level 2 units sold in 2015

• Impacts on the grid?• Demand‐response capable?• Energy consumption of new features and functionality?

Market projections: Plug-In Hybrid and Electric Vehicles

Source: Department of Energy, 2014http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/12/f19/SGIG‐EvaluatingEVcharging‐Dec2014.pdf

Focus on EVSE Level 1 and 2

9

• Level 1 Charger: Home/office• Level 2 Charger: Home/office/commercial. Represents

most of installed base of chargers.

• Will evaluate future opportunities to address DC Fast Charging

Energy Efficiency Opportunity: Partial On (Sleep) Mode(EVSE Level 2 chargers)

Energy Efficiency Opportunity: Partial On (Sleep) Mode

11

Energy Efficiency Opportunity

• Network Connectivity.

• Smart Grid (demand response functionality), signaling information to the consumer.

12

Introducing ENERGY STAR Draft 1 Test Method for EVSE• Draft developed with Dept. of Energy’s Argonne National

Laboratory, Idaho National Laboratory, and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. – Brings together expertise in EV-related standards (SAE),

EVSE testing and network connectivity.

Addresses:• Scope• Definitions • Set up to test energy efficiency different modes• Set up to account for network connectivity• Other features (i.e. occupancy sensors) • Placeholder for functionality related to smart grid

15

Next Steps

Test Method:• Webinar on July 9, 2015.• Feedback due to EPA July 24, 2015.• Draft 2 Test Method ~Sept 2015, followed by data

collection and final draft of test method later in the Fall.

Specification:• Fall 2015 develop Draft 1 specification for stakeholder

feedback.• Subsequent Drafts in late fall 2015, early winter 2016.• Anticipate finalizing specification in spring 2016.

15

Thank you!To be added to EPA’s stakeholder listserve

to receive specification updates, please email:

[email protected].

Verena Radulovic Product Manager, ENERGY STAR

(202) [email protected]

16

www.energystar.gov/productdevelopment

Impact ofPower Electronic Loads

on Bulk‐Power System Stability

EPRI IWG MeetingJune 24, 2015

Dmitry Kosterev (BPA), Ryan Quint (NERC), Jun Wen (SCE), Joe Eto (LBNL), John Undrill

1

Timeframes

cycle second minute hour day year 10‐year

Stability

Capacity

Energy

2

Large‐Scale Power System OutagesLarge scale power outages are expensive

August 10, 1996 September 8, 2011

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1003600

3800

4000

4200

4400

4600

4800

5000

Time (sec) from 15:47:30

Pow

er (

MW

)

COI Power, August 10 1996

40

45

50

55

60

65

0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0

Freq

uency (Hz)

Time (sec)

3

• Our expectation:– We see a collaborative discussion of what is needed and what is

feasible– We see this presentation as the first round, more to follow ….

• Our goals:– Electric Vehicles are expected to become a sizable part of electrical

load– Large scale integration of Electric Vehicles should “Do No Harm” to the

reliability of bulk electric power system– We want Electric Vehicle Chargers to be “inherently good”– We do not advocate V2G or “smart” features for Electric Vehicles inthis

presentation

4

Voltage Response

5

Voltage Ranges

105%

95%

70%

Faults

Over‐voltage

Typical operating voltage range

Voltage Sags

6

Voltage Oscillations

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

105%

110%

50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150

Voltage Power

Desired Voltage Response – Sags and Oscillations

Active power follows voltage, i.e. behaves as a constant current load

7

• Residential single‐phase air‐conditioners have high likelihood of stalling when supply voltage drops to 45‐60% for 3 or more electrical cycles.

• Once stalled, they remain stalled and draw high current from the grid.

Voltage Response – Faults

EV Charger

8

• Therefore, disconnecting EV chargers at voltages as high as 70‐75% is desirable, before AC stall occurs.

• Fast reconnection upon voltage recovery important to avoid overvoltage conditions after fault clearing.

Desired Voltage Response ‐ Faults

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%110%

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

‐20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

Fault

EV Trips

EV Reconnects

EV Follows Voltage

9

Desired Voltage Response

Voltage

Power

80% 100%70%

100%

0%

80%

10

Desired Voltage Response• Active power is proportional to voltage

– Response time is less than 20 millisecond

• Stay connected for voltage sages as low as 80%

• Ramp power to zero / disconnect when the voltage drops below 80% – If disconnecting, randomize voltage trip settings between 70%

and 80% to provide diversity

• Active power is zero when the voltage is below 70%

• Reconnect when the voltage recovers to above 90%, with a time delay of 100‐250 milliseconds

11

Frequency Response

12

Western Interconnection System Frequency

60.0 = nominal frequency60.06 = typical operating range

59.94 = typical operating range

59.5 = first stage of coordinated under‐frequency load shedding

58.0 = high possibility of complete power blackout

Over‐generation

‐ Typical generation outages, 15 to 20 times per year

‐ Large generation outages, 2 to 3 times per year

13

‐ Large blocks of bulk load shedding

‐ System islanding

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0

Freq

uency (Hz)

Time (sec)

System Frequency ‐ Islanding

14

Disconnect EVs

Power Outage

Control Load Shedding Begins

System Frequency – Large Generation Outage

15

59.6

59.7

59.8

59.9

60

60.1

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

Frequency

98

98.5

99

99.5

100

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

Desired Power‐Frequency Response

EV continues charging, power follows frequency

Desired Frequency Response

Frequency

Power

59.7 60.059.959.5

100%

0%

99.5%

16

First Level of Under‐FrequencyBulk Load Tripping

Desired Frequency Response• Active power is proportional to system frequency

– Response time is less than 100 milliseconds

• May remain connected for frequency drops as low as 59.7 Hz

• Ramp power to zero / disconnect (trip) when frequency drops below 59.7 Hz– If disconnecting, randomize frequency trip settings between

59.75 and 59.55 Hz to provide diversity

• Active power is zero when the frequency is below 59.5 Hz

• Reconnect when the system frequency is back in “normal” range• 59.94 to 60.06 Hz with time delay of 100‐500 milliseconds

17

In Conclusion…• System events include simultaneous voltage and frequency deviations• In normal operations, voltage fluctuations on percentage basis will usually

dwarf frequency fluctuations • Voltage will usually drive the overall EV response

• Desired Performance: • EVs will remain connected for “normal” grid disturbances – minor

faults, generator trips, etc.• EVs active power consumption will follow system V and F, providing

grid support during disturbance conditions• EVs will disconnect during large unexpected underfrequency events,

usually during system break‐up and cascading outages• EVs will disconnect during severe system faults or abnormal voltages,

with reconnection capability immediately after grid recovery

18

ContactsDmitry Kosterev, Bonneville Power Administration, [email protected]

Ryan Quint, NERC, [email protected]

Jun Wen, Southern California Edison, [email protected]

Joe Eto, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, [email protected]

John Undrill

19

NEC CMP12 UPDATE

Jeffrey Menig Global Facilities – Facility Engineering

NEC CMP12 UPDATE

The 2017 NEC Cycle• First Draft Meeting was January 2015• First Draft Ballot; April 3, 2015• First Draft Report was posted June 22, for Public

Comment• First Draft Report is available for viewing and Public

Comment at www.nfpa.org “NFPA 70: National Electrical Code®“

• Public Input closing Date for Online Submission is September 25, 2015

• Public Input closing Date for Paper Submittal is August 21, 2015

• Second Draft Meeting; November 2-14, 2015

NEC CMP12 UPDATE

The 2017 NEC Cycle

• Second Draft Ballot; January 15, 2016• Correlating Committee; January through March• Posting of Final Second Draft for NITMAM (Notice of

Intent to Make a Motion); April 8, 2016• NITMAM Closing Date April 29, 2016• Completion for Publication; August 2016

NEC CMP12 UPDATE

The 2017 NEC Cycle

EPRI IWC Recommended Changes to Article 625 and 626• Definition Clarifications in 625.2 and 626.2• Modify Language to accommodate Wireless Charging

Technology throughout 626 and 626• Add new section for Wireless Charging

NEC CMP12 UPDATEThe 2017 NEC CycleProblem Areas• 625.17(A)(3) The 12 in. Power Supply Cord• 625.44 – New language around Portable, Stationary and

Fixed installations.(A)Portable Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment

(2) A Nonlocking, 2-pole, 3-wire grounding-type receptacle outlet rated 250 volt, single phase, 15 or 20 amperes.

Why this is a problem:Several Manufactures have UL “Listed and Labeled” 250V cord and plug connected portable EVSE’s that would no longer be allowed by code.

NEC CMP12 UPDATEThe 2017 NEC CycleFirst Revision No. 3379-NFPA 70-2015 [Section No. 625.44]625.44 Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment Connection.

Equipment shall be connected to the premises wiring system in accordance with one of the following:

(A) Portable equipment shall be connected to the premises wiring systems by one of the following methods:

(1) A nonlocking, 2-pole, 3-wire grounding-type receptacle outlet rated at 125 volt, single phase, 15 and or 20 amperes

(2) A nonlocking, 2-pole, 3-wire grounding-type receptacle outlet rated 50 volts dc maximum, 15 or 20 amperes

The length of the power supply cord, if provided, between the receptacle outlet and the equipment shall be in accordance with 625.17(A) (3).

NEC CMP12 UPDATETo View the 2017 NEC

Submit Comments to these sections

Navigate to:http://www.nfpa.org/codes-and-standards/document-information-pages?mode=code&code=70Select the “Next Edition” Tab, Then click on “First Draft Report”

NEC CMP12 UPDATE


John HalliwellPrincipal Project Manager

EPRI IWCJune 24, 2015

SAE J1772™ Update


Status

28 day Task Force Ballot was completed first week of JuneMet on June 16 to discuss minor comments received

– Task Force consensus on all items– Double checking one item with connector vendors– As of today – all comments cleared

Meeting minutes to be posted this weekWill submit the Version 6 J1772 document to the Hybrid

Committee by Monday of next weekHybrid Committee will have a 28 day ballotAny comments will required a 14 day ballot in Hybrid

CommitteeThen on to formatting and the Motor Vehicle CouncilThen Publication


Not steps

We will start working on the Version 7 document once SAE clears us to start the new document

SAE PEV Communication & Interoperability Task Force Status

IWC MeetingJune 24, 2015

6/24/2015 Rich Scholer ‐ SAE Communication and Interoperability Task Force 1

Background


SAE Communication BackgroundMajor Documents and Functions

Rich Scholer ‐ SAE Communication and Interoperability Task Force 3

1. J2836™ - Use Cases (establishes requirements) Technical Information Report (TIR)

2. J2847 – Messages, diagrams, etc. (derived from the use case requirements) -2 is Standard and others are Recommended Practice (RP)

3. J2931 – Communication Requirements & Protocol TIR

4. J2953 – Interoperability RP

5. J3072 – Interconnection Requirements for Onboard, Utility-Interactive, Inverter Systems Standard

6/24/2015

J2931/7 Security

Rich Scholer ‐ SAE Communication and Interoperability Task Force 4

SAE Document Interaction

Smart Charging(U1 – U5)

DC Charging

PEV as Distributed Energy Resource (DER)

(U6 & U7)

Diagnostics

Customer to PEV and HAN/NAN

(U8 & U9)

Wireless Power Flow

Use Cases Applications & Signals Protocol

PLC(BB OFDM)

Internet

IEEE 802.11p

Requirements

J2836/1™ J2847/1 J2931/1

J2836/2™ J2847/2

J2836/3™ J2847/3

J2836/4™ J2847/4

J2931/4

J2836/5™ J2847/5 J2931/5

J2836/6™ J2847/6 J2931/6

J2953/1 Interoperability, J2953/2 Test Procedures

6/24/2015

J3072On-board Inverter

DER Mode

ISO/IEC Status


J2836™/?

J2847/2J2931/1, 4

J2953/1, 2

J2836/6™J2847/6J2931/6

See next page

ISO/IEC Status (cont)


• ISO/IEC/ 15118‐6/‐7/‐8 Status April 15 2015

‐1

‐2

IEC Schedule (Serge Roy)


IEC/ISO DC charging related International Standards in development


Current Status


Activate SAE Documents ‐ 20151. J2836/3™ ‐ V2 ‐ Use Cases for the PEV Communicating as a Distributed

Energy Resource (DER) 2. J2836/5™ ‐ V1 ‐ Use Cases for Customer to PEV3. J2847/2 – V4 ‐ DC Charging messages/signals4. J2847/6 – V1 – Wireless Charging messages/signals5. J2931/1 – V3 ‐ Protocol Requirements6. J2931/6 – V1 ‐ Digital Communication for Wireless Charging Plug‐in Electric

Vehicles7. J2931/7 – V1 ‐ Security8. J2953/1 – V2 ‐ Interoperability requirements9. J2953/2 – V2 – Interoperability Plan and Report10. J3072 ‐ V1 ‐ Interconnection Requirements for Onboard, Utility‐Interactive,

Inverter Systems


DC chargingRich Scholer/Papiya Bagchi/Jim Allen

• J2847/2 ‐ V3 – DC charging messages and signals– Published 4‐09‐15.– V4 reopened for Hank’s DER, WPT effects & harmonization with ISO 15118‐2, ‐3.

• J2931/1 – V3 – Protocol Requirements– Published 12‐11‐14– V4 reopened for Security adds

• J2931/4 – V3 – Broadband PLC– Published 10‐22‐14



V2G, DER, and Reverse Power Flow StandardsHank McGlynn

J2836/3™ V2 - Use Cases for PEV as a DER• Find and fix errors in Version 1• Provide link to J3072 for onboard inverter• Establish role of EVSE inverter

– EVSE to PEV clearly required to define J2847/2 DER Mode– Should EVSE to Utility be covered? To what extent?

J3072 V1 - Interconnection Requirements for Onboard, Utility-Interactive, Inverter Systems• Completed Hybrid ballot March 1st.• Completed 14 day Affirmation due to comments March 18th.• Published 5-19-15.

J2847/2 V4 - Communication Between Plug-In Vehicles and Off-Board DC Chargers• V3 (to harmonize with DIN 70121:2012) published 4-9-15.• V4 reopened for DER effects.

• include harmonization with ISO 15118-2 & -3 that have some variations to DIN SPEC 70121.

• include some Wireless Charging info to clarify items in J2847/6 since J2847/2 is the basis for the additional WPT messages/signals.


Is Hank excited or what??

Customer to PEV com (Telematics)George Bellino


• J2836/5™ V1 ‐ Use Cases • Published 5‐7‐15.

• J2847/5 (V1) is next for messages and signals.• J2931/5 (V1) for protocol follows.

J2847/6 – V1 - Wireless charging messagesMark Klerer/Peter Thompson


• Completed Hybrid ballot & 14 day affirmation.• Finished SAE formatting 6‐17‐15, next is MVC ballot, then published.

• V2 is being planned for some unresolved comments and further harmonization with ISO 15118‐6, 7 & 8.– ISO 15118‐6 & ‐7 may now be rolled into ‐1 & ‐2

J2931/6 – V1 ‐Wireless charging protocol

• 14 Day Topic to task force started 5‐29‐15.• Next is 28 day Hybrid ballot, formatting, then publication

SecurityGordon Lum

• J2931/1 – V4 – Protocol Requirements– V3 published for DC Charging– Is reopened to include security updates (high level)

• J2931/7 – V1 – Security– Restarted and correlating with SGIP comments on J2931/1.

– Meetings to restart in July.


J2953/1 & /2 – InteroperabilityTed Bohn

• J2953/1 (requirements).– V1 testing at Intertek (control pilot and prox) is complete and waiting for final report.

– V2 is DC communications plus J1772 V6 changes

• J2953/2 (plan & procedure) – V1 & 2 ‐ Tracking J2953/1 effort.


Summary/Backup


Use Case Document Status ‐ TIRJ2836/1™ ‐ Utility Use Cases

– V1 Published 2010‐04‐08J2836/2™ ‐ DC Charging Use Cases

– V1 Published 2011‐09‐15J2836/3™ ‐ PEV as a Distributed Energy Resource (DER) Use Cases

– V1 Published 2013‐01‐03– V2 being revised to add requirements for DC RPF for J2847/2 & role of

J3072 J2836/4™ ‐ Diagnostics Use Cases

– V1 Started for failures on control pilot and prox, but waiting for J2953/1 & /2 (Interoperability) for more data

J2836/5™ ‐ Customer to PEV Use Cases– V1 published 5‐7‐15

J2836/6™ ‐Wireless Charging Use Cases– V1 Published 5‐3‐13.

Rich Scholer ‐ SAE Communication and Interoperability Task Force 196/24/2015

Signal/Message Document Status – RP/StandardJ2847/1 ‐ Utility signals/messages

– V1 Published 2010‐06‐16, V2 2011‐05‐09, V3 2011‐11‐9, V4 11‐5‐13J2847/2 ‐ DC Charging (Standard)

– V1 Published 2011‐10‐21, – V2 ‐ 2012‐08‐20 to align with J1772 V5 (DC charging).– V3 Published 4‐09‐15– V4 restarted (June, 2015) to cover

• EVSE inverter with DC RPF (J2836/3 V2) • Include ISO/IEC 15118‐2 & ‐3 updates (variations to DIN SPEC 70121)• Include Wireless Charging updates

J2847/3 ‐ PEV as a Distributed Energy Resource (DER)– V1 Published 2013‐12‐10

J2847/4 ‐ Diagnostics– Started but waiting for J2836/4™ & J2953/1 & /2 (Interoperability)

J2847/5 ‐ Customer to PEV– Meetings to start soon since J2836/5™ Use Cases are complete.

J2847/6 ‐Wireless Charging– V1 in ballot cycle– V2 planned for unresolved issues from V1 and further alignment with ISO 15118.


Requirements and Protocol Documents ‐ TIRJ2931/1 – Requirements

– V1 Published 2012‐01‐24, V2 Published 2012‐09‐07– V3 In ballot cycle ‐ updated for DC Charging – V4 Reopened for Security additions

J2931/4 – PowerLine Carrier (PLC) – wired communication protocol

– V1 Published 2012‐07‐26, V2 Published 2013‐11‐14– V3 Published 10‐22‐15 for DC Charging

J2931/5 – Telematics – wireless communication protocol– Waiting for J2847/5

J2931/6 – Wireless Charging Communication (IEEE 802.11p) wireless charging protocol– Started ballot cycle

J2931/7 ‐ Security– Restarted to align with J2931/1


Interoperability Documents ‐ RP

J2953/1 – Requirements– V1 Published 2013‐10‐07.

• V1 started testing for the analogue communications (J1772™ control pilot and prox).

– V2 is addressing digital communication for DC charging

– V3 will include WPT interopJ2953/2 – Test plan

– V1 Published 2014‐01‐22– V2 Adding V1 updates and DC Charging– V3 will include WPT interop


On‐board Inverter ‐ Standard

J3072 (V1) – Requirements• Published 4‐9‐15.


The End

Questions?



John Halliwell

Principal Project Manager

Updated

June 08, 2015

EVSE UPDATE


North American AC EVSE

Product List, Page 1

ABB (AC Level 2)

AddEnergie Technologies (AC Level 1 & 2)

Advanced Charging Technologies (A.C.T.) (AC Level 2)

Aerovironment (AC Level 2)

Audi AG (AC Level ?)

AVCON Corporation (AC Level 2 Legacy)

Bosch (formerly SPX, Inc) (AC Level 2)

BTCPower (AC Level 1 & 2)

CarCharging Group (Formerly ECOtality) (AC Level 2, charging network)

ChargePoint (AC Level 1 & 2, charging network)

ClipperCreek (AC Level 1 & 2)

DBT EV Charging Solutions (AC Level 1 & 2)

Delta Electronics, Inc (AC Level 2)

Delphi Automotive Systems (AC Level 1)

Dr. Ing. h. c. F. Porsche (AC Level 1)

Eaton Corporation (AC Level 2)

Electric Vehicle Institute (EVI) (AC Level 2)

Evatran (Wireless)

EV-Charge America (AC Level 1 & 2)

EVextend (AC Level 1 Enclosure)

EVoCHARGE LLC (AC Level 2)

EVSE LLC (Control Module Ind.) (AC Level 1 & 2; Circuit sharing device)

Garage Juice Bar LLC (AC Level 1 & 2)

General Electric (AC Level 2)

GoSmart Technologies (AC Level 2)

Green Garage Associates (AC Level 2)

Greenit Inc (AC Level ?)

GridBot, LLC (AC Level 1 & 2)

IER (AC Level ?)

Ingeteam Inc. (AC Level 2)

Keba AG (AC Level 2)

Kyungshin Corporation (AC Level 1)

Lear Corp. (AC Level 1 & 2)

Legrand/Pass & Seymour (AC Level 1 & 2)

Leviton (AC Level 1 & 2)

Lite-On Clean Energy Technology, Corp (AC Level 2)

meritCharge (eVergo) (AC Level 2)

RED Text Indicates Some Products

Listed to UL Standards


North American AC EVSE

Product List, Page 2

Milbank (AC Level 2)

MOVE, Inc. (AC Level 1 & 2)

North Shore Safety (?)

Optimization Technologies (OpConnect) (AC Level 1 & 2, charging network)

Panasonic Corporation (Panasonic Electric Works Co. Ltd. (AC Level 1)

ParkPod LLC (AC Level 1 & 2)

PEP Stations, LLC (AC Level 2)

Poulsen Hybrid, LLC. (AC Level 2)

Schneider Electric (AC Level 2)

SemaConnect (AC Level 1 & 2, charging network)

Shanghai Viasystems EMS CO LTD (AC Level 2)

ShorePower (AC Level 1 & 2)

43 Companies Now Have Some NRTL

Listed/Recognized AC EVSE Products

RED Text Indicates Some Products

Listed to UL Standards

57 Companies Total

Siemens Energy Inc. (AC Level 1 & 2)

Signet Systems, Inc (AC Level 2)

Telefonix, Inc (AC Level 1 & 2)

Tellus Power (AC Level 2)

Tesla Motors (AC 240V, 72A Proprietary)

Tyco Electronics Corp (AC Level ?)

Volta Charging (AC Level 2; charging network)

Yazaki North America, Inc. (AC Level 1)


DC EVSE/Charger Product List

ABB (CHAdeMO, Combo, CHAdeMO/Combo)

AddEnergie Technologies (DC CHAdeMO/Combo)

Advanced Charging Technologies (A.C.T.) (dual cable CHAdeMO/Combo)

Aerovironment (CHAdeMO)

Andromeda Power (CHAdeMO, portable)

Ashwoods Energy (McLaren P1 off-board charger)

BTCPower (CHAdeMO, Combo, CHAdeMO/Combo)

Blink (ECOtality) (CHAdeMO)

ChargePoint (CHAdeMO)

DBT EV Charging Solutions (CHAdeMO)

Delta Electronics, Inc. (CHAdeMO)

Eaton Corporation (CHAdeMO)

Efacec (CHAdeMO, Combo, CHAdeMO/Combo)

14 Companies Now Have Some NRTL

Listed/Recognized DC Charging Products

EvCollective (CHAdeMO /w onboard battery)

EVTEC AB (CHAdeMO, Combo, portable)

Fuji (CHAdeMO)

IES Synergy (CHAdeMO, Combo)

JFE Engineering Corporation (CHAdeMO)

Nichicon (CHAdeMO)

Nissan/Sumitomo (CHAdeMO)

Schneider Electric (CHAdeMO)

Signet Systems, Inc (CHAdeMO,

CHAdeMO/Combo)

Tritium PTY LTD (CHAdeMO/Combo)

23 Companies Total


SAE J1772™ Vehicle Connectors (240Vac) – Page 1

Amphenol Tuchel (30A-240V - Connector; 3A-240V, 30A - Inlet)

BizLink Technology, Inc. (30A-600V, 50A-600V - Connector; 50A-600V - Inlet)

Chung Kwang Electric Wire & Cable, CO LTD (18A-300V, 25A-300V, 30A-600V – Connector & Inlet)

Delphi Corporation (13A-240V, 15A-120V, 15A-240V, 18A-240V, 20A-240V, 30A-240V, 32A-240V – Connector; 15A-120V, 15A-240V, 32A-240V – Inlet)

General Cable Corporation (16A-240V, 20A-240V, 32A-240V, 65A-240V, 80A-240V - Connector)

Greatlink Electronics Taiwan LTD (16A-120/240V, 32A-240V, 40A-240V-Connector)

Harting Automotive GMBH (16A-250V, 30A-250V, 32A-250V – Connector; 16A-250V, 30A-250V -Inlet)

Integro, LLC (30A-240V – Breakaway Connector)

ITT Cannon, LLC (15A-120V, 15A-240V, 16A-120/240V, 20A-120V, 20A-240V, 30A-240V, 40A-240V, 75A-240V, 80A-240V – Connector; 15A-120V, 15A-240V, 20A-120V, 20A-240V, 30A-240V, 40A-240V, 75A-240V - Inlet)

Jiangyin Sinbon Electronics CO LTD (16A-240V, 20A-240V, 30A-240V, 65A-240V, 80A-240V –Connector)

Korea Electrical Terminal CO LTD (16A-240V - Inlet)

Kyungshin Corporation (Kia Motors) (12A-120V – Connector and Inlet)

Lear Corp (rating not specified - Connector & Inlet)

Leviton (15A-120V, 20A-240V, 30A-240V, 40A-240V - Connector)

Marechal Electric SA (87A-250V - Connector & Inlet) (Not sure if J1772)

List based on Intertek website, UL website and web searches

RED Indicates

Recognized to UL 2251


SAE J1772™ Vehicle Connectors (240Vac) – Page 2

Method Electronics, Inc. (16A-300V, 30A-300V - Connector)

Pass & Seymour (rating not specified – Connector)

Philatron (?)

Phoenix Contact (rating not specified – Connector)

Power Product LLC (formerly Actuant Electrical - DBA Marinco) (60A-240V – Connector)

Rema USA, LLC (16A-240Vac/240Vdc, 30A-240Vac/240Vdc, 50A-600Vac/600Vdc – Connector; 16A-240Vac/240Vdc, 30A-240Vac/240Vdc, 50A-600Vac/600Vdc - Inlet)

Sumitomo Wiring Systems, LTD (12A-120/277Vac, 15A-120/277Vac - Connector; 15A-120/277Vac, 32A-120/277Vac - Inlet)

Suzhou Chilye Green Technology Co LTD (15A-120/240Vac, 20A-120/240Vac, 30A-120/240Vac -Connector; 30A-120/240Vac - Inlet)

Tesla Motors (80A-240Vac – J1772 to Tesla Inlet Adapter)

Tyco Electronics Amp GMBH (16A-240Vac, 32A-240Vac – Inlet)

Tyco Electronics Corp (TE Connectivity) (18A-240Vac, 30A-240Vac - Connector)

Well Shin Technology Company LTD (15A-120/240Vac, 20A-120/240Vac, 30A-120/240Vac – Connector and Inlet)

Yazaki Parts Company, LTD (12A-120/240Vac, 13A-120/240Vac, 13A-280Vac, 15A-120/240Vac, 15A-280Vac, 20A-120/240Vac, 20A-280Vac, 30A-120/240Vac, - Connector; 15A-120/240V, 20A-120/240V, 20A-280V, 30A-120/240V, 40A-120/240V, 40A-280V - Inlet)

Zhangjiagang Youcheng Technology & Engine CO LTD (16A-240Vac, 30A-240Vac – Connector; 16A-240Vac, 30A-240Vac – Inlet)

RED Indicates

Recognized to UL 2251

29 Companies Total28 Companies Have Some NRTL

Recognized Connector Products


CHAdeMO Vehicle Connectors Recognized to UL 2251

Dyden Corporation (125A-500Vdc - Connector)

Japan Aviation Electronics Industry LTD (120A-500Vdc;

125A-500Vdc - Connector)

Sumitomo Electric Industries, LTD (125A-500Vdc -

Connector)

Yazaki Corporation (120A-500V, 125A-500V - Connector;

100A-500V, 120A-500V, 125A-500V - Inlet)

4 Companies Have Some NRTL


4 Companies Total


SAE Combo Vehicle Connectors Recognized to UL 2251

Rema USA, LLC (65A-600Vac, 74A-600Vac, 150A-600Vac,

174A-600Vac - Connector; 30A/150Adc, 30A/174Adc,

600Vac Inlet)

Korea Electrical Terminal CO LTD (16A-240Vac/150A-600V

- Inlet)

Harting Automotive GMBH (41A-500Vdc – Connector) (not

clear what standard this connector is for)

3 Companies Total

3 Companies Have Some NRTL



Electric Vehicle Service Providers (EVSP) – North

America

ABB - http://www.abb.us/product/us/9AAC172689.aspx

Advanced Charging Technologies – http://www.evchargers-act.com/

Aerovironment - http://evsolutions.avinc.com/services/subscriber_network

Beam Charging (Car Charging Group) - http://www.beamcharging.com/

Blink (Car Charging Group) - http://www.carcharging.com/ - also - http://www.blinknetwork.com/

Charge Bliss - http://www.chargebliss.com/

ChargePoint - http://www.chargepoint.com/

EV Connect - http://www.evconnect.com/

Evercharge - http://www.evercharge.net/

eVgo (NRG Energy) - http://www.evgonetwork.com/

EVoasis - http://www.evoasis.com/

General Electric - http://www.geindustrial.com/products/electric-vehicle-charging-stations/wattstation-connect

Greenlots - http://greenlots.com/

Liberty Plugins - http://www.libertyplugins.com/

meritCharge - http://meritcharge.com/

MOEV, Inc. - http://www.moevinc.com/#!/page_home

Opconnect - https://www.opconnect.com/Home/Welcome

SemaConnect - http://www.semaconnect.com/

Sun Country Highway (Canada Only) - https://suncountryhighway.ca/

SunSpeed Enterprises - http://sunspeedenterprises.com/

U-Go Stations - http://www.ugostations.com/

VERnetwork (AddEnergie - Canada Only) - http://www.reseauver.com/index.en.html

Volta Charging - http://www.voltacharging.com/#1

http://www.abb.us/product/us/9AAC172689.aspx

http://www.evchargers-act.com/

http://evsolutions.avinc.com/services/subscriber_network

http://www.beamcharging.com/

http://www.carcharging.com/

http://www.blinknetwork.com/

http://www.chargebliss.com/

http://www.chargepoint.com/

http://www.evconnect.com/

http://www.evercharge.net/

http://www.evgonetwork.com/

http://www.evoasis.com/

http://www.geindustrial.com/products/electric-vehicle-charging-stations/wattstation-connect

http://greenlots.com/

http://www.libertyplugins.com/

http://meritcharge.com/

http://www.moevinc.com/#!/page_home

https://www.opconnect.com/Home/Welcome

http://www.semaconnect.com/

http://www.semaconnect.com/

http://sunspeedenterprises.com/

http://www.ugostations.com/

http://www.reseauver.com/index.en.html

http://www.voltacharging.com/#1


Wireless and Other – Products List

Alpha Energy (the Alpha Group) (solar

vehicle charging)

Conductix/Wampfler (wireless

charging)

Delphi (wireless charging)

Envision Solar (portable solar charging

station)

Evatran, LLC (wireless charging)

Flanders’ Drive (wireless charging)

Green DOT Racing Inc (contact wireless

charging)

HEVO Power (heavy duty wireless

charging)

Liberty PlugIns Inc. (point of sale,

station management)

Momentum Dynamics Corporation

(wireless charging)

Olev Technologies (wireless charging)

One Sun (solar charging stations)

SEW-Eurodrive, Inc. (wireless charging)

SolarCity (solar vehicle charging)

WiTricity Corporation (wireless

charging)

Qualcomm (formerly HaloIPT) (wireless

charging)

Wireless charging products can be listed to UL 2202 and other related charger standards.

Transmit and receive coils to be listed under UL 2750 (a work in progress).


Buses (draft list – needs industry input)

BYD

Complete Coach

Gillig

Lion

New Flyer

Nova Bus

OLEV Technologies

Proterra

Transpower USA

Volvo

Wave Technology


A Couple of Websites that have EVSE (AC) Listings

http://www.pluginamerica.org/accessories

– Includes listing status and pricing

http://www.goelectricdrive.com/index.php/charging/charging-

equipment-virtual-showroom-new-ged

– Vendor list where vendors must submit survey info to be listed on

the site

http://www.pluginamerica.org/accessories

http://www.goelectricdrive.com/index.php/charging/charging-equipment-virtual-showroom-new-ged


Devices are Listed/Recognized by OSHA Defined NRTLs

Nationally

Recognized Testing

Laboratorories

Just searching UL’s database won’t

show all products that are listed

https://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/

https://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/

Infrastructure Working Council (IWC) Presentations

Documents

Transcript of Infrastructure Working Council (IWC) Presentations