Informatics 121 Software Design I

37
Department of Informatics, UC Irvine SDCL Collaboration Laboratory Software Design and sdcl.ics.uci.edu 1 Informatics 121 Software Design I Lecture 4 Duplication of course material for any commercial purpose without the explicit written permission of the professor is prohibited.

description

Informatics 121 Software Design I. Lecture 4 Duplication of course material for any commercial purpose without the explicit written permission of the professor is prohibited. Today’s lecture. Design is difficult. Informatics 121 definition. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Informatics 121 Software Design I

Page 1: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 1

Informatics 121Software Design I

Lecture 4

Duplication of course material for any commercial purpose without the explicit written permission of the professor is prohibited.

Page 2: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 2

Today’s lecture

• Design is difficult

Page 3: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 3

Informatics 121 definition

• To decide upon a plan for change in the world that, when realized, satisfies stakeholders

Page 4: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 4

Design

designer plan

maker change in the world

audience experiences

other stakeholders

Page 5: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 5

Design failures

Page 6: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 6

Design failures

Page 7: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 7

Design failures

(2006)

Page 8: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 8

Design failures

(1988)

Page 9: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 9

Design failures

(1988)

Page 10: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 10

Design failures

(1988)

Page 11: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 11

Design failures

(1988)

Page 12: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 12

Design failures

(1979)

Page 13: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 13

Design failures

(1984)

Page 14: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 14

Design failures

(1940)

Page 15: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 15

Design failures

Page 16: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 16

Software design

software designer software

compiler runnable program

users experiences

other stakeholders

Page 17: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 17

Design failures

Air-Traffic Control System in LA AirportIncident Date: 9/14/2004 Ironic Factor: ***** (IEEE Spectrum) -- It was an air traffic controller's worst nightmare. Without warning, on Tuesday, 14 September, at about 5 p.m. Pacific daylight time, air traffic controllers lost voice contact with 400 airplanes they were tracking over the southwestern United States. Planes started to head toward one another, something that occurs routinely under careful control of the air traffic controllers, who keep airplanes safely apart. But now the controllers had no way to redirect the planes' courses. ... The controllers lost contact with the planes when the main voice communications system shut down unexpectedly. To make matters worse, a backup system that was supposed to take over in such an event crashed within a minute after it was turned on. The outage disrupted about 800 flights across the country. ... Inside the control system unit is a countdown timer that ticks off time in milliseconds. The VCSU uses the timer as a pulse to send out periodic queries to the VSCS. It starts out at the highest possible number that the system's server and its software can handle—232. It's a number just over 4 billion milliseconds. When the counter reaches zero, the system runs out of ticks and can no longer time itself. So it shuts down. Counting down from 232 to zero in milliseconds takes just under 50 days. The FAA procedure of having a technician reboot the VSCS every 30 days resets the timer to 232 almost three weeks before it runs out of digits.

Page 18: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 18

Design failures

NASA Mars Climate OrbiterIncident Date: 9/23/1999 Price Tag: $125 million Ironic Factor: **** WASHINGTON (AP) -- For nine months, the Mars Climate Orbiter was speeding through space and speaking to NASA in metric. But the engineers on the ground were replying in non-metric English. It was a mathematical mismatch that was not caught until after the $125-million spacecraft, a key part of NASA's Mars exploration program, was sent crashing too low and too fast into the Martian atmosphere. The craft has not been heard from since. ... Noel Henners of Lockheed Martin Astronautics, the prime contractor for the Mars craft, said at a news conference it was up to his company's engineers to assure the metric systems used in one computer program were compatible with the English system used in another program. The simple conversion check was not done, he said.

Page 19: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 19

Design failures

Ariane 5 ExplosionIncident Date: 9/1997 Price Tag: $500 million Ironic Factor: **** (By James Gleick) It took the European Space Agency 10 years and $7 billion to produce Ariane 5, a giant rocket capable of hurling a pair of three-ton satellites into orbit with each launch and intended to give Europe overwhelming supremacy in the commercial space business.

All it took to explode that rocket less than a minute into its maiden voyage last June, scattering fiery rubble across the mangrove swamps of French Guiana, was a small computer program trying to stuff a 64-bit number into a 16-bit space.

...

This shutdown occurred 36.7 seconds after launch, when the guidance system's own computer tried to convert one piece of data -- the sideways velocity of the rocket -- from a 64-bit format to a 16-bit format. The number was too big, and an overflow error resulted. When the guidance system shut down, it passed control to an identical, redundant unit, which was there to provide backup in case of just such a failure. But the second unit had failed in the identical manner a few milliseconds before. And why not? It was running the same software.

Page 20: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 20

Design failures

Page 21: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 21

Design failures

Page 22: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 22

Design failures

Page 23: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 23

A caveat: not all design failures are bad

Page 24: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 24

A caveat: not all design failures are bad

But we generally do not have this luxury!

Page 25: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 25

Design failures

designer plan

maker change in the world

audience experiences

other stakeholders

Page 26: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 26

Design failures

designer plan

maker

audience experiences

other stakeholders

feasibility

change in the world

Page 27: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 27

Design failures

designer plan

maker change in the world

audience

other stakeholders

desirability

experiences

Page 28: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 28

Design failures

designer plan

maker

audience

other stakeholders

desirability

experiences

feasibility

change in the world

Page 29: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 29

Detour: wicked problems

• The problem is not understood until after the formulation of a solution

• Wicked problems have no stopping rule• Solutions to wicked problems are not right or wrong• Every wicked problem is essentially novel and unique• Every solution to a wicked problem is a “one shot operation”• Wicked problems have no given alternative solutions

Page 30: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 30

Difficulty #1: problem, solution, change

• The understanding of a design problem goes hand-in-hand with the understanding of its design solution

• This understanding may well change, sometimes dramatically so, during the design project

• The challenge is to anticipate this volatility and identify and focus on the essence of the design problem at hand

Page 31: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 31

Difficulty #2: success, failure, tradeoffs

• A design’s success is not absolute, but judged relative to other possible designs that could have been made

• A designer must deal with tradeoffs all the time, and cannot make all stakeholders equally satisfied with the change in the world

• The challenge is to identify and address key tradeoffs early

Page 32: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 32

Difficulty #3: quality, cost, time

• There is no optimal solution to a design problem, designers must find a solution that is good enough

• The challenge is to find key quality and cost considerations early

Page 33: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 33

Difficulty #4: longevity

• A change in the world may last for a very long time…

• …and may well need to accommodate future changes in the world

• The challenge is to identify and balance present needs with future possibilities

Page 34: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 34

Routine, adaptive, original design

Page 35: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 35

Design work

• Goal driven• People oriented• Fluid• Creative• Rigorous• Knowledge intensive• Uncertain• Subjective

Page 36: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 36

Design studio 1

• You are tasked with designing a “virtual campus visit” system that is to advertise UC Irvine and the wonderful things that are going on here

• Identify the different audiences and what their experiences should be

• Identify the other stakeholders and the goals they may have

• Clearly document these in a typewritten document, to be handed in on Monday, October 15, at the beginning of class– separate list of audience and experiences– separate list of other stakeholders and goals

Page 37: Informatics 121 Software Design I

Department of Informatics, UC IrvineSDCL Collaboration LaboratorySoftware Design and

sdcl.ics.uci.edu 37

Design studio 1

• Assignment is on an individual basis, but will be continued in class on Monday

• You should identify as broad an audience and experiences as possible

• You should identify as broad a range of other stakeholders and goals as possible

• The overall focus is on brainstorming– your document does not need to have lengthy narratives (but should

be clear)