Info Para La Web, Abril 2010con Ajustes-1 English Version

download Info Para La Web, Abril 2010con Ajustes-1 English Version

of 9

Transcript of Info Para La Web, Abril 2010con Ajustes-1 English Version

  • 8/6/2019 Info Para La Web, Abril 2010con Ajustes-1 English Version

    1/9

    Productive Profile

  • 8/6/2019 Info Para La Web, Abril 2010con Ajustes-1 English Version

    2/9

    Productive Model

    Through a solid and conservative growth, La Redencin SofroGroup has positioned itself as one ofArgentinas mainagricultural companies.

    The agricultural activity is carried out by managing third partiesland.

    Our development model is based on increasing productivitythrough:

    Implementation of new technologies within a sustainabilityframework.

    Application of specific technological packages for each environment.

    No-till farming in 100% of the land.

    Generation and management of knowledge through the system ofExperimental Farms, a model that has been copied by AAPRESID(Argentine No-Till Farmers Association).

  • 8/6/2019 Info Para La Web, Abril 2010con Ajustes-1 English Version

    3/9

    TimeTime

    RotationRotation

    FARM KNOWLEDGEFARM KNOWLEDGE

    LRSLRSApproachApproach

    TechnologyTechnology ManagementManagement

    Our Approach of Sustainable Developmentand Land Preservation

    Productive Model(Cont.)

    Fertility

    a

    nd

    Fertility

    a

    nd

    Profitab

    ili

    ty

    Profitab

    ili

    ty

    No-tillNo-tillfarmingfarming

  • 8/6/2019 Info Para La Web, Abril 2010con Ajustes-1 English Version

    4/9

    Crop management androtation strategies thatenable to increase theefficiency of the use of waterand to increase the soilsorganic carbon, according tothe environments.

    Technological Package.Rotation Scheme.

    Soja: soy

    Trigo: wheat

    Maz: corn

  • 8/6/2019 Info Para La Web, Abril 2010con Ajustes-1 English Version

    5/9

    Area per CropEvolution

    Average Yield

    Evolution

    Productive TrackRecord

    Wheat Soy 2 Soy 1 IP Soy Corn 2 Corn 1 Total

    Proy.:

    Projection

  • 8/6/2019 Info Para La Web, Abril 2010con Ajustes-1 English Version

    6/9

    If the production yields of the Group were analyzedregarding the Argentinean average, one could see that, ingeneral, they are greater for most campaigns, for the maincrops of our business.

    LRS Soy Yield vs. Argentina LRS Corn Yield vs. Argentina

    Record(Cont.)

    Source: http://www.siia.gov.ar/index.php/series-por-tema/agricultura

    Source: http://www.siia.gov.ar/index.php/series-por-tema/agricultura

  • 8/6/2019 Info Para La Web, Abril 2010con Ajustes-1 English Version

    7/9

    LRS Yield Evolution vs. CREA

    17,5 qq, 30% above historical average

    6,5 qq; 26% above over historical average

    Record(Cont.)

  • 8/6/2019 Info Para La Web, Abril 2010con Ajustes-1 English Version

    8/9

    LRS Yield Evolution vs. CREA

    Area: SE ofCrdoba Province

    The average of the lat 5 agricultural campaigns is considered

    Productive TrackRecord (Cont.)

    Corn 1 Soy 1 Wheat Soy 2

  • 8/6/2019 Info Para La Web, Abril 2010con Ajustes-1 English Version

    9/9

    Risk Factors

    MAIN RISKS HOW DO WE MITIGATE THEM?Volatility of Crops Yield Geographic Diversification

    Crops Diversification

    Diversification of Sowing Dates and RipeningCycles

    Diversification of Grains, Seeds and Use ofDifferent Products that Enable CropProtection

    Volatility of Commodities

    Price

    Definition of Objective Prices

    Control over the Moment of the Sale Operations in the Futures and Options Market

    Coverage Through Derivatives

    Permanent Assessment