Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Endoscopy and Imaging Hans Herfarth, MD, PhD University of North...
-
Upload
cora-jordan -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
2
Transcript of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Endoscopy and Imaging Hans Herfarth, MD, PhD University of North...
Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesEndoscopy and Imaging
Hans Herfarth, MD, PhDUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Ulcerative colitis: Definition
Recurrent inflammatory and ulcerating disease of the colon and rectum
Diarrhea, bleeding, crampy abdominal pain,reduced appetite and weight loss
Diffuse inflammation with ulcerations, crypt abscesses, inflammatory infiltrates and reduced number of goblet cells
leftsidedColitis
Progression from rectum to cecum
Proctitis
BackwashIleitis
Pan-Colitis
Crohn’s disease: Definition
Subacute or chronic inflammation of thedigestive tract (mouth to anus)
Crampy abdominal pain, weight loss,diarrhea and fever
Local inflammation with microerosions, fissures, ulcers, granulomas, inflammatory infiltrates and lymphangiectasias
Clinical Symptom in IBDs
Ulcerative colitis
80 %
90 %
47 %
0 %
5 %
1 %
40 %
38 %
11 %
Crohn’s disease
22 %
73 %
77 %
16 %
54 %
35 %
27 %
29 %
10 %
Bleeding
Diarrhea
Abdominal pain
Fistulae
Weight loss
Fever
Anemia
Arthralgia
Iridocyclitis, uveitis
Clinical symptoms
Laboratory findingsMicrobiology findings
Histology
EndoscopyRadiologicImaging
Endoscopy and X-ray small bowel
Gastroscopy
- Staging- Cancer screening- Suspicion of stricture- Need for more intensified therapy
- Staging- Suspicion of
stomach problems
Small Bowel evaluation- Staging- Suspicion of fistulae- Suspicion of stricture
Colonoscopy
Small bowel follow throughCT/MR-enterographyCapsule endoscopy
Normal findings of the ileum and colon
Ascending colonTerminal ileum
Normal findings in the transverse colon
UC - Spectrum of DiseaseUC - Spectrum of Disease
MildMild
ModerateModerate SevereSevere
NormalNormal
CD: spectrum of endoscopic appearances
Inflammatory bowel disease and
the risk of colon cancer
Lower CI
Cumulative risk of CRC1
Upper CI
Copenhagen 1962–972
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Time from diagnosis (years)
Cum
ula
tive p
robabili
ty (
%)
Eaden et al. 2001; Winther et al. 2001
Cumulative risk of developing colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis
• Frequency of surveillance colonoscopy not defined,
every 1-2 years suggested
• Ulcerative Colitis
– Extensive disease: 8-10 years after onset
– Left-sided disease: 12-15 years after onset
– Proctitis: not necessary
– Primary sclerosing cholangitis: immediately
• Crohn’s Disease
– Extensive colonic disease: 8-10 years after onset
Recommendations for cancer screening colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel diseases
Small bowel diagnostics
Imaging Modalities in IBD
Per Patient Sensitivity and Specificity
Studies Patients (n)
Sensitivity % [Range]
Specificity % [Range]
Ultrasound 9 1000 90 [78-96] 96[67-100]
Scintigraphy
3 152 88 [76-95] 85 [78-93]
CT 4 113 84 [77-87] 95[67-100]
MRI 7 292 93[82-100]
93[71-100]
Horsthuis et al. 2008
Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies MRI, CT, Scintigraphy, Ultrasound in IBD
Advantages individual techniques
- MR, CT,(US): extraluminal pathologies.
- US: Cheap and fast
- MR, US: no radiation
- SBFT: information about small bowel motility (adhesions)
Disadvantages individual techniques
- MR, CT, Scintigraphy, PET: no information about small bowel motility
- US: no standardized documentation
- MRI: Acquisition time, costs, availability (!)
Advantages and Disadvantages of Different Imaging Modalities
Possible Diagnostic Approaches for Evaluation of the Small Bowel and Complications of IBD
Major significance 12.1%
Moderate significance
19.7%
Minor significance 68.2%
710 patients with suspected or proven
IBD
Clinical Significance of Extraintestinal Findings in Patients with IBD Detected During MR-
enterography
Herfarth et al. 2009
CT: +840%
SBFT: -65%
Year
Nu
mb
er
of
exam
inati
on
s
Increasing Use of CT-enterography at a Tertiary Referral Center
Peloquin et al. 2008
CT Scans Performed in the United States
Brenner et al. 2007
Radiation Dose for Commonly Used Imaging Studies in Gastroenterology
Annual exposure to environmental radiation: Approx. 3 mSv
Brenner et al. 2003 and 2007
DNA strand breaksMismatch-repair
Threshold effect(cancer risk only above 75-100 mSv)Linear dose-effect relationship?
?
Radiation and Cancer Risk
Risk of Cancer Due To Diagnostic X-ray Exposure
3.2%
1.8%
Berrington de Gonzalez and Darby 2004
Imaging Studies and Cumulative Effective Dose (CED) of Diagnostic Radiation in Crohn’s Disease
Patients
Desmond et al. 2008
15.5%
354 patients Cumulative effective dose range (mSv)
Exp
ose
d p
ati
en
ts [
%]
Cumulative Effective Dose of Diagnostic Radiation over a 15 Years Time Period in Patients with Crohn’s Disease
Desmond et al. 2008
• Analysis of one Claims data base time period 2003-2004 for diagnostic imaging studies in children age 2-18.
• Moderate exposure to diagnostic radiation: 1 CT or 3 fluoroscopic procedures.
Radiation Exposure of Children with IBD in the United States 2003-2004 (Claims Database
Analysis)
Palmer et al. 2009
• CT has evolved as the main imaging modality in IBD with a significant risk of high cumulative doses of diagnostic radiation exposure for IBD patients.
• The long term effects of low dose radiation exposure are still debated.
Summary CT Imaging and Conclusion
We need to
•Better define risk profiles of patients for diagnostic radiation exposure.
•Monitor exposure to radiation in the individual IBD patient.
•Long –term follow up (30-50 years) of IBD cohorts for complications of radiation injury.
We need to
•Better define risk profiles of patients for diagnostic radiation exposure.
•Monitor exposure to radiation in the individual IBD patient.
•Long –term follow up (30-50 years) of IBD cohorts for complications of radiation injury.
Take Home CT- or MR-enterography
• CT-and MR-enterography have a a comparable sensitivity for intestinal pathologies as SBFT
Advantage :
• extraluminal pathologies.
• No radiation (MR)
Disadvantage:
• no information about small bowel motility
Capsule Endoscopy
1. Optical Dom2. Lens holder3. Lens4. LED’s5. Camera6. Batteries7. Transmitter8. Antenna
Dimensions:
Width: 11mm Length: 26mmWeight: 3.7g
Capsule
Comparison Capsule Endoscopy (CE) – CT-enteroclysis (CTE) in IBD
n=41
Voderholzer et al. 2005
CE CTE
Large lesions
8 5
Small lesions
23* 10
*p<0.007
56 patients screened, 15 patients excluded due to suspicion of stricture (27%) !
Case
• Since 13 years Iron deficiency anemia despite iron
supplementation
• Since 10 years recurrent episodes of abdominal cramps
(2 days - 2 weeks duration)
• Multiple endoscopies of the upper and lower GI-tract without
pathological findings
Female patient, 44 years
Clinical examination and Lab results
• 44 years, overweight (155 cm, 72 kg)
• Physical examination unremarkable
Lab results
Hemoglobin (g/dl) 11.4 11.7-15.7
MCV (fl) 75 80-100
MCHC(g/dl) 24 32-36
Iron (µg/dl) 13 50-170
Ferritin (ng/ml) 10.8 10-120
Transferrinsaturation (%) 2 16-45
Clinical work-up
Endoscopy upper GI-tract
MR-Enteroclysis
Ileocolonoscopy (30cm into terminal ileum)
Exclusion of celiac disease (transglutaminase antibodies) and bacterial overgrowth (H2-exhalation test).
negative
Capsule endoscopy
• Multiple ulcerations jejunum (longitudinal)
• Two inflammatory stenoses jejunum
Suspected Crohn´s disease
Therapy and Follow-up
Therapy:
• Budesonide (Entocort®) for 16 weeks
• Iron supplementation orally
Follow-up (4 months): No bowel cramps, normal hemoglogin, no iron supplementation necessary
Problem: Crohn´s disease is only suspected, not proven
Medical history
• Since 10 years diarrhea and constipation, constant pain right
lower abdomen
• PMH: hysterectomy 20 years ago, lysis of adhesions 3 times
(last repair of incarcerated hernia with Marlex mesh 9 years
ago), arthritis, depression, hypertension, type II diabetes,
GERD, obesity
• Upper and lower GI-endoscopy negative, SBFT questionable
irregularities terminal ileum
Female patient, 50 years
Clinical examination and Lab results
• 46 years, overweight (BMI 43)
• Physical examination unremarkable except pain during deep palpation right lower abdomen.
Lab results
Normal range: Hgb, MCV, platelets, ESR.
Capsule endoscopy and NSAIDs
40 volunteers 75 mg Diclofenac 2x daily for 14 days, (+ 20 mg Omeprazol 2 x daily)
Capsule endoscopy and calprotectin - measurementbefore and after 2 weeks of Diclofenac intake
Maiden et al. 2005
Calprotectin elevated 75%
Capsule endoscopy pathologic(Bleeding, Ulceration, Erythema)
68%
Lesions not distinguishable from Crohn’s disease patients
Summary capsule endoscopy
Suspicion of Crohn’s disease• Capsule endoscopy should be performed in cases of negative upper
and lower endoscopy and negative small bowel imaging (SBFT, CT- or
MR-Enterography).
Problem: Verification (Double or single – balloon enteroscopy, )
Proven Crohn’s disease• Capsule endoscopy significantly more sensitive compared to
radiological imaging in detecting inflammatory lesions momentarily no therapeutic consequences!
Except: in cases with “therapy refractory IBD” and negative upper and
lower endoscopy and negative CT or SBFT ( in case of negative result: IBS/IBD!)
Endoscopy in the futureEndoscopy in the future