© iNEMI 2013

iNEMI Project on Alternative Materials

Assessment

SOW Review Sessions

9/17, 10 pm – 11 pm ET 9/18, 11 am – noon ET

Co-leaders Intel (Stephen Tisdale) Intel (Dr. Leo Kenny)

HP (Helen Holder)

2 © iNEMI 2013

Alternative Materials Assessment Statement of Work Review

•  Introduction of Project Chairs •  Overview of iNEMI/Project Process •  What is Green Chemistry •  Project Details •  Summary and next steps •  Q&A

Agenda

Note:  All  phones  will  be  on  mute  un2l  the  end  of  the  presenta2on  

3 © iNEMI 2013

Alternative Materials Assessment

•  Stephen Tisdale… Intel, Manager – Industry Standards –  Bachelor’s Degree in Chemistry from Holy Cross College, an MBA in Operations Management from U-Mass

and a Masters in Program Management from George Washington University –  He has worked on a number of environmental initiatives and is involved in various Consortia Projects and

Standards Development Committees –  Holds more than 30 patents covering new material formulations, manufacturing processing and product

design

•  Dr. Leo Kenny… Intel, Senior Technology Development Engineer (Materials EHS) –  Leading role for green chemistry initiative within Intel, external engagement with research consortia, former

ITRS ESH Chair

–  Previously , managed one of Intel’s two environmental process engineering groups, within Fab Technology Development

–  Diverse research in semiconductor, materials, device, medical, agricultural and biological fields –  Previous work experience in academia; both large and small companies in different industries and with the US

Government

–  PhD in Physical Inorganic Chemistry (Tufts U); BS in Chemistry and BS in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology (U Arizona)

Project Leaders

© iNEMI 2013

iNEMI and Project Process

Mark Schaffer

5 © iNEMI 2013

About iNEMI

International Electronics Manufacturing Initiative (iNEMI) is an industry-led consortium of around 100 global manufacturers, suppliers, industry associations, government

agencies and universities. Working on advancing manufacturing technology since 1994. Visit us at www.inemi.org

5 Key Deliverables: •  Technology Roadmaps •  Collaborative Deployment

Projects •  Research Priorities Documents •  Proactive Forums •  Position Papers

3 Major Focus Areas: •  Miniaturization •  Environment •  Medical Electronics

Mission: Forecast and Accelerate improvements in the Electronics

Manufacturing Industry for a Sustainable Future.

6 © iNEMI 2013

International Members Across The Total Supply Chain (Q311)

6

Key Observations: •  New members joining to participate in Environmental and Packaging Projects and

in collaborative R&D opportunities •  170% Growth in Europe Since 1/1/2010; 60% Industry Growth Overall •  160% Growth in University/Research Institutes Since 1/1/2010

 Total Global Supply Chain Integration

The  Interna*onal  Membership   Incorporated  Loca*on;  Number  of  Members  

INEMI  Member  Business  Type   North  America  

Asia  Region  

Europe   Totals  

OEM   14   2   2   18  

ODM/EMS  (inc.  pkg.  &  test  services)   4   7   11  

Material  Suppliers   8   14   11   33  

Equipment  Suppliers   8   1   2     11  

Universi2es  &  Research  Ins2tutes   8   2   3   13  

Organiza2ons/consul2ng   10    1   2   13  

Totals   52   27   20   99  

7 © iNEMI 2013

The Project Process - 5 Steps

SELECTION

DEFINITION

PLANNING

EXECUTION / REVIEW

CLOSURE

1

2

3

4

5 Limited to iNEMI Members

Open for Industry input

------------------- iNEMI Technical Committee (TC) Approval Required for Execution

What is Green Chemistry

Dr. Leo Kenny - Intel

9

The design of chemical products and processes that reduce or eliminate the use or generation of hazardous substances; applicable across the life cycle of a chemical product, including its design, manufacture, and use.

What is Green Chemistry*?

* As defined in text by Warner & Anastos (1998) and used by US EPA , ACS etc

10

•  Prevention It is better to prevent waste than to treat or clean up waste after it has been created.

•  Atom Economy Synthetic methods should be designed to maximize incorporation of all materials used in the process into the final product.

•  Less Hazardous Chemical Syntheses Wherever practicable, synthetic methods should be designed to use and generate substances that possess little or no toxicity to human health and the environment.

•  Designing Safer Chemicals Chemical products should be designed to affect their desired function while minimizing their toxicity.

•  Safer Solvents and Auxiliaries The use of auxiliary substances (e.g., solvents, separation agents, etc.) should be made unnecessary wherever possible and innocuous when used.

•  Design for Energy Efficiency Energy requirements of chemical processes should be recognized for their environmental and economic impacts and should be minimized. If possible, synthetic methods should be conducted at ambient temperature and pressure.

Green Chemistry Principles*

* Anastas, P. T. and Warner, J. C. Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice, Oxford University Press: New York, 1998.

11

•  Use of Renewable Feedstocks A raw material or feedstock should be renewable rather than depleting whenever technically and economically practicable.

•  Reduce Derivatives Unnecessary derivatization (use of blocking groups, protection/de-protection, temporary modification of physical/chemical processes) should be minimized or avoided if possible, as such steps require additional reagents and can generate waste.

•  Catalysis Catalytic reagents (as selective as possible) are superior to stoichiometric reagents.

•  Design for Degradation Chemical products should be designed so that at the end of their function they break down into innocuous degradation products and do not persist in the environment.

•  Real-time analysis for Pollution Prevention Analytical methodologies need to be further developed to allow for real-time, in-process monitoring and control prior to the formation of hazardous substances.

•  Inherently Safer Chemistry for Accident Prevention Substances and the form of a substance used in a chemical process should be chosen to minimize the potential for chemical accidents, including releases, explosions, and fires

Green Chemistry Principles*

* Anastas, P. T. and Warner, J. C. Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice, Oxford University Press: New York, 1998.

12

Research Exploration

Pathfinding, Architecture Development

HVM, Production

Process, Product Development

World Semiconductor Council ITRS

Regulatory Influencing and Compliance

Con

cept

de

velo

pmen

t In

tern

al o

r ext

erna

l

Chemical Replacement

Today +15 yrs 2-3 yrs 4-6 yrs

Sponsored Research, consortia

Green Chemistry methodology

Integra(ng  Sustainable/Green  Chemistry  Methodology  =                An  ongoing,  proac(ve  engagement  across  the  process/product  life  cycle  

Suppliers

Waste treatment, Air emissions Abatement

Auditing, Risk Assessments EICC, extractives Up front evaluation = lower COO

INEMI

13

Implementation Concept: Multiple ‘Touch Points’

Research Exploration

Pathfinding, Architecture Development

HVM, Production

Process, Product Development

Con

cept

de

velo

pmen

t In

tern

al o

r ext

erna

l

•  Employed by chemical, pharma, complex consumer product industries •  Process framework, specific decision deliverables, at pre-defined milestones (go/no go

checkpoints) •  Critical that key stakeholders are brought in, to engage appropriate content experts (LEAN) •  Use alternative assessment tools, key to improve decision making, to understand broad LCA

implications of choices •  a complex set of tool choices, with various pros/cons

Green screen Dashboard tools Multi-model,

extensive tools Eco efficiency, process tools

GC synthesis strategies

Product content, article focus

Chemical design, potential restrictions Emissions re-purposing

14

Alternative assessment tool examples •  Dashboard/screen tools

–  http://www.cleanproduction.org/Greenscreen.php –  http://www.epa.gov/dfe/pubs/projects/gfcp/ –  http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/exposure/pubs/episuite.htm

•  Broader (multi-module tools), predictive capabilities –  www.chemply.com –  http://www.epa.gov/dfe/pubs/projects/gfcp/ –  http://www.oecd.org/env/ehs/risk-assessment/theoecdqsartoolbox.htm#

•  Product/tox focus –  http://www.elarabio.com/ElaraBio/Home.html –  http://www.epa.gov/oppt/sf/tools/pbtprofiler.htm

•  Eco efficiency, process tools –  http://www.basf.com/group/corporate/en/content/sustainability/eco-efficiency-analysis/index –  US EPA WMT

•  Eco label tools –  http://ec.europa.eu/environment/ecolabel/ –  http://www.greenseal.org/ –  https://select-ecolabels.basf.com/Applications/EcoLabelManager.nsf

Alternative Materials Assessment

Project Details

16

Project Summary

• Problem –  There is no uniform methodology within governments, NGOs or industry for

examining new or alternative materials for environmental or human health impacts. As a result, chemical restrictions are inconsistent and can negatively impact the product roadmaps of electronics manufacturers.

• Opportunity –  Proactively assess and benchmark the tools, not substances, and improve the

decision making process for evaluation of new / alternative materials. Goal –  Develop a clear understanding of tool capabilities and implement a business

process / methodology to develop and assess new or alternative materials.

• Goal –  Develop a stakeholder aligned methodology / stepwise approach to develop

and assess new or alternative materials.

17

Approved Project Summary

Project will be conducted in 2 phases:

•  Phase 1 – examine existing environmental/toxicology assessment tools or methodologies used for assessing alternatives in industry, NGOs, academia and governmental agencies. Identify applicability to current and future electronic manufacturing and products. Conduct limited benchmark testing utilizing a small set of materials of interest. Develop a gap analysis including pros/cons of each methodology. (Defining criteria for assessment)

•  Phase 2 – select methodologies/tools proposed from Phase 1 to screen the materials typically used in electronic products or manufacturing of products. As part of this phase, pilots would be undertaken to apply the methodology to common materials in the electronics industry and feedback lessons learned into the tool development. (Confirming Methodology or developing methodology if none was ID in Phase 1)

18

IS / IS NOT Analysis (Phase 1)

19

Tasks List (Phase 1) Lead Task Description

Task 1: Educational Review (Ensure no duplication of activities and alignment of methodology) •  Review of similar research – IC2, OECD, CA, HESI etc.

Task 2a: Identify and Select existing alternative assessment tools and activities that will be studied, e.g. GreenScreen, Usetox, EPA-DfE Task 2b: Develop descriptors and evaluation criteria for the tools, e.g. Logistics of compatibility of the tools, Costs of the software , How do tools deal with data gaps, Verification – what level of subjectivity is in the tool/is subjectivity minimized Task 2c: Conduct evaluation of individual tools based on criteria developed in 2b

Task 3: Define criteria for evaluation based on where in the life cycle the product / part is (Finished product evaluation may be different than for additive evaluation)

Task 4: Pick a representative set of chemicals of concern for suppliers to electronics industry and the electronics industry itself •  Production Chemicals •  Product Chemicals •  Should include (for effective benchmarking):

o  “control” substances o  Known problematic substances o  Novel/New substances

Task 5: Benchmark - run evaluations on the representative set of chemicals (from Task 1) and compare results based on strengths and weaknesses identified in evaluation phase

Task 6: Document development – create a report that parallels the work of UMASS-Lowell but focused on suitability of the tools for the electronics industry

Task 7: Recommendation of an “ideal case” scenario based on project key learnings •  Single Tool? •  Multiple Tools? •  Framework/methodology?

20

Proposed Schedule

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Phase 1 Task 1 Task 2a Task 2b Task 2c Task 3 Task 4 Task 5 Task 6 Task 7

Planning on Kickoff meeting mid-November

21

IS / IS NOT Analysis (Phase 2)

This Project IS: This Project IS NOT: Provide initial analysis of what the Project IS and IS NOT

Select methodologies/tools proposed from Phase 1 to screen materials for the use of these materials in electronic products or manufacturing of products. As part of this phase, pilots would be undertaken to apply the methodology to common materials in the electronics industry and feedback lessons learned into the tool development.

The actual hazard ranking of thousands of substances.

Guidance on what is an unacceptable substance

Test against some existing and/or proposed RoHS Substances and possibly the California Alternative Assessment for some materials that may be of concern examine alternatives

22

Participation on SOW Inputs –  iNEMI staff

•  Mark Schaffer

–  Engaged Participants

•  Inventec (Patrice Rollet, Rodrigo Aguilar)

•  Intel (Steve Tisdale, Leo Kenny)

•  Clariant (Adrian Beard)

•  ETBC (Barbara Kyle)

•  EPEAT (Pamela Brody-Heine)

•  Dell (Albert Tsang)

•  IHS (MaryLiz Burns)

•  HP (Helen Holder)

•  Clean Production Action (Lauren Heine)

© iNEMI 2013

iNEMI Project on Alternative Materials

Assessment

Summary and Next Steps

24 © iNEMI 2013

Summary and Next Steps •  Project has been approved by the iNEMI Technical Committee •  Open Enrollment for Project Sign-up will continue until October 18, 2013 •  More information can be found at

Alternative Materials Assessment Project Page

•  Steps for Joining the Project –  Please note: iNEMI membership is required to participate in the iNEMI Project for

Alternative Materials Assessment. The period for becoming a founding member of this project will close on October 18, 2013. Steps for joining the project are outlined below. •  For iNEMI members:

–  Complete and sign the project statement –  Fax the completed statement to +1 (703) 834-2735 or scan + email to infohelp@inemi.org

•  For non-members: –  Discuss annual membership fees with Bill Bader in North America

(bill.bader@inemi.org), Haley Fu in Asia (haley.fu@inemi.org), or Grace O'Malley in Europe (gomalley@inemi.org).

–  Complete the iNEMI membership application. (www.inemi.org) –  Fax the completed documents to +1 (703) 834-2735 or scan + email: infohelp@inemi.org. –  Complete and sign the Project Statement –  Fax the completed statement to +1 (703) 834-2735or scan + email to infohelp@inemi.org.

www.inemi.org  Email  contacts:  

Mark  Schaffer  

marks@inemi.org