Indivisible or intersecting issotl 08

16
Indivisible or Indivisible or Intersecting? Intersecting? A Cross Institutional View of Active Learning

Transcript of Indivisible or intersecting issotl 08

Page 1: Indivisible or intersecting issotl 08

Indivisible or Intersecting?Indivisible or Intersecting?A Cross Institutional View of Active

Learning

Page 2: Indivisible or intersecting issotl 08

ContentsContentsActive Learning – a brief introductionThe ProjectFindings from one aspect of the

researchComparing two ‘models’A serendipitous story

Page 3: Indivisible or intersecting issotl 08

But first......this:But first......this:Take the 3 post-it notes and, one

definition/word/phrase per post it, write down:

The three things that best define Active Learning for you.......

Page 4: Indivisible or intersecting issotl 08

IntroductionIntroduction The term ‘active learning’ (AL) is often used intuitively rather

than with a common understanding (Bonwell and Eison, 1991).

The link between ‘doing’ and ‘learning’ is often identified within the Confucian aphorism ‘I see, I forget; I hear, I remember; I do, I understand’ (Beard, 2008).

Such an approach has spawned a range of ‘active’ pedagogies, often termed ‘discovery learning’ (Mayer, 2004), often as a rail against lecturing (Bonwell and Eison, 1991).

Recent critiques of discovery learning have questioned its efficacy, especially those which exhibit minimal instruction (e.g. Mayer, 2004; Kirschner et al., 2006).

Mayer (2004) and the ‘constructivist teaching fallacy’ Range of literature relating teachers’ approaches to teaching

and the links between learning outcomes and teaching activities (e.g. Ramsden, 1992; Prosser & Trigwell, 1999; Biggs, 2003)

Page 5: Indivisible or intersecting issotl 08

Potted highlights of my AL Potted highlights of my AL experienceexperience

As a student:◦Non-plussed in the lab!◦Too little time, too much activity?

As a teacher:◦Reinventing my own experience◦COZIP – AL is ‘learning by

doing’....what evidence did we have?

Page 6: Indivisible or intersecting issotl 08

The Project MethodologyThe Project MethodologyThe initial questionnaire

◦Longevity of and confidence in use◦Examples of practice◦Locus of support◦Definition of AL

Follow up interviews◦SQUIN (Wengraf, 2001)◦Gestalt questioning methodology

(Holloway & Jefferson, 2000)

Page 7: Indivisible or intersecting issotl 08

A quick reflexive A quick reflexive moment.....moment.....

Page 8: Indivisible or intersecting issotl 08

Initial thoughtsInitial thoughtsWe found three ‘families’ of conceptions

With a partner, try and sort your own definitions into these groups and return them to the front

Page 9: Indivisible or intersecting issotl 08

Two contrasting modelsTwo contrasting models

Page 10: Indivisible or intersecting issotl 08

Testing the modelsTesting the modelsRespondant Response A Response B Response C

UoG1

UoG2

UoG3

UoG4

UoG5

UoG6

UoG7

UoG8

UoG9

UoG10

UoG11

UoG12

UoG13

UoG14

UoG15

UoG16

UoG17

UoG18

UoG19

UoG20

UoG21

UoG22

UoG23

UoG24

UoG25

UoG26

UoG27

UoG28

UoG29

UoG30

UoG31

UoG32

UoG33

UoG34

UoG35

SSU1

SSU2

SSU3

SSU4

SSU5

SSU6

SSU7

SSU8

SSU9

SSU10

SSU11

SSU12

SSU13

SSU14

SSU15

SSU16

SSU17

INTERNAL

EXTERNAL

HOLISTIC

Page 11: Indivisible or intersecting issotl 08

Testing the modelsTesting the modelsRespondant Response A Response B Response C

UoG1

UoG2

UoG3

UoG4

UoG5

UoG6

UoG7

UoG8

UoG9

UoG10

UoG11

UoG12

UoG13

UoG14

UoG15

UoG16

UoG17

UoG18

UoG19

UoG20

UoG21

UoG22

UoG23

UoG24

UoG25

UoG26

UoG27

UoG28

UoG29

UoG30

UoG31

UoG32

UoG33

UoG34

UoG35

SSU1

SSU2

SSU3

SSU4

SSU5

SSU6

SSU7

SSU8

SSU9

SSU10

SSU11

SSU12

SSU13

SSU14

SSU15

SSU16

SSU17

INTERNAL

EXTERNAL

HOLISTIC

Page 12: Indivisible or intersecting issotl 08

Some tentative Some tentative conclusionsconclusions• All respondents identified conceptions that suggest that they

believe student passivity does not promote learning.

• Ongoing debate about what this passive/active dimension looks like in class. Different teachers view student activity differently.

• This does not help us form a concrete definition of AL, except to say that it is clearer to define what it is not, rather than what it is!

• So do our students have a clue what’s going on?

• What good practice can be shared between teachers who see AL differently?

• How do these two ‘worlds’ of doing and thinking meet? Is this fixed or do approaches vary in time and context?

Page 13: Indivisible or intersecting issotl 08

Return to the textReturn to the text

To listen and yet it is easy to forget

To see/perceive and yet it is easy to remember/record

To be/act as and yet it is easy to understand

Page 14: Indivisible or intersecting issotl 08

New insights?New insights?Not just ‘doing’, but ‘being’Sense of ‘embodiment’, and

‘thinking as’No sense of first two lines being

used negativelyThe final character contains the

‘heart radical’ – mind and heart

Page 15: Indivisible or intersecting issotl 08

Thoughts so farThoughts so farWe can identify a range of conceptions

that teachers hold, concerning ALBy and large, an individual views AL as

a complex mix of the physical and cognitive

It is not just ‘learning by doing’, and, in fact, it NEVER was!

The need to introduce practice that promotes self-reflection and internalisation of learning

Page 16: Indivisible or intersecting issotl 08

“One's action ought to come out of an achieved stillness: not to be a mere

rushing on..”D. H. Lawrence