Department of Education

Central/Regional/Division Level

1.0 Summary of Information Required

1.1 Name of Delivery Unit: __________

1.2 Total No. of Officials and Employees Entitled to PBB: __________

2.0 Ranking of Personnel

2.1 Top 15%

(Best Performer)

2.2 Next 30%

(Better Performer)

2.3 Next 55%

(Good Performer)

Form 2.0

REPORT ON RANKING OF PERSONNEL

Ranking

TOTAL:

Annex 7

No. of Employees Entitled to PBB

#REF!

#REF!

#REF!

#REF!

Form 2.0

REPORT ON RANKING OF PERSONNEL

Department of Education

Performance-Based Bonus

Performance Review and Evaluation Template

Individual Level

Fiscal Year 2013

Region Division Unique Item Number Last Name First Name Middle Name 1st Semester

FY 2013

2nd Semester

FY 2013

Average

Performance

Rating

Rank Percentile Performance

Category

(If delivery unit

falls under the

'Best' or 'Better'

category)

Performance

Category

(If delivery unit

falls under the

'Good' category)

Not Entitled #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!

Employee Profile Performance Rating Performance RankingEmployee Eligibility

NOTE: The employee

has satisfied the

criteria under provision

nos. 11 (a-f) and 12 of

DepEd Order No. 33, s.

2013.

(Yes/No)

INSTRUCTIONS:

1.

Column Description

Column A Name of Region

Column B Name of Division

Column C Unique Item Number

Column D Last Name

Column E First Name

Column F Middle Name

Column G Employee Eligibility

Column H 1st Semester FY 2013

Column I 2nd Semester FY 2013

Performance Rating

Fill out the required data/information in the Individual PRET. For columns which already have formula, copy the formula up to the end row or last row of individual.

Individual Profile

Employee Eligibility

The following table serves as a guide on the specific data/information that each column should contain.

Column J Average Performance Rating

Column K Rank

Column L Percentile

Column M Performance Category

(If delivery unit falls under the 'Best' or 'Better' category)

Column N Performance Category

(If delivery unit falls under the 'Good' category)

4.

5.

6.

7. Using Annex 9 of DepEd Order No. 33, s. 2014, the RPREC should officially submit to the NPREC on or before August 15, 2014 the consolidated Forms 2.0 or Reports on Ranking of Personnel for the Regional Office and all

the Division Offices within the region.

After conducting the Individual Ranking, transfer the results from the Individual PRET to Form 2.0 or Report on Ranking of Personnel. This form is also formula-based. Double-check the figures versus the results in the

Individual PRET. This form is a refined version of the form enclosed in DepEd Order No. 33, s. 2014 as Annex 7. Please use this format instead.

After filling out all the required fields in the Individual PRET, sort the Average Performance Rating (Column J) from highest to lowest. This can be done by clicking the drop-down button in Cell J9 and selecting 'Sort Largest

to Smallest' from the options. This procedure will rank the personnel within the delivery unit based on their FY 2013 average performance rating.

All formula-based columns should be copied up to the end row or last row of personnel.

Performance Ranking

Remarks

For checking purposes, input 'Yes' if the employee has satisfied the criteria under provision nos. 11 (a-f) and 12

of DepEd Order No. 33, s. 2013 and 'No' if otherwise. Should the employee does not satisfy any of the applicable

criteria, he/she should be removed from the list.

Performance Rating

Data/information required in these columns should be encoded in number format.

If the employee is the head of delivery unit, input 'Head of Office' in both Columns H and I. These include all

heads of each delivery unit specified under provision and Third Level Officials under CESPES (i.e.,

Undersecretaries, Assistant Secretaries, Directors, Assistant Directors, SDSs, ASDSs and all designated Third Level

Officials in an Acting or Officer-In-Charge (OIC) capacity).

This procedure will automatically assign the Head of Office or Delivery Unit to the top of the ranking. However,

Third Level Officials must still satisfy the criteria specified under provision no. 11 (a-f) of DepEd Order No. 33, s.

2013.

NOTE: Per DepEd Order No. 33, s. 2014, "The heads of each delivery unit shall automatically receive the highest

amount of incentive which the delivery unit will receive based on the performance categorization specified in

Table 8 under provision no. 25 of this Order. However, performance ratings of the heads of delivery units shall be

subjected to executive checking and vetting by their respective immediate superiors to be submitted to the PBB

Fill out the required data/information in the Individual PRET. For columns which already have formula, copy the formula up to the end row or last row of individual.

Individual Profile

Employee Eligibility

NOTE: All personnel who should be included in the list and be entitled to 2013 PBB should observe the criteria

specified under provision nos. 11 (a-f) and 12 of DepEd Order No. 33, s. 2014.

NOTE: All DepEd officials and employees, including teachers, enumerated in Annex 4 of DepEd Order No. 33, s.

2014, who are recipients of national awards in FY 2013 from Civil Service Commission (CSC), Metrobank

Foundation and National Literacy Awards which are duly recognized by both CSC and DepEd are automatically

entitled to PhP 35,000 bonus regardless of the rank or performance category of their delivery unit. These

personnel are not subject to ranking; hence there is no need to include their names in the list for Individual

PRET.

The following table serves as a guide on the specific data/information that each column should contain.

This column already has formula which computes for the average performance rating of the first and second

semesters. Copy the formula up to the end row or last row of personnel. Specifically, the following have been

followed:

- If the employee is the head of office/delivery unit, the average performance rating is automatically set at ten

(10) and rank is automatically set at Rank 1.

- If the employee has no rating (blank) for any of the two (2) semesters, this column shows that the employee is

'Not Entitled' to the FY 2013 PBB.

- If the employee has an 'Unsatisfactory' rating (4.5 and below) for any of the two (2) semesters, this column

shows that the employee is 'Not Entitled' to the FY 2013 PBB.

This column already has formula which computes for the rank of each personnel. Copy the formula up to the end

row or last row of personnel.

This column already has formula which computes for the percentile by which each personnel belongs. Copy the

formula up to the end row or last row of personnel.

This column already has formula which computes for the Performance Category of each personnel should the

delivey unit falls under the 'Best' or 'Better' category. The ranking of the delivery units will be done nationally.

The NPREC will conduct the ranking. The results of the ranking of delivery units as well as the amount of PBB

incentive per personnel will be disseminated through a memorandum.

This column already has formula which computes for the Performance Category of each personnel should the

delivey unit falls under the 'Good' category. The ranking of the delivery units will be done nationally. The NPREC

will conduct the ranking. The results of the ranking of delivery units as well as the amount of PBB incentive per

personnel will be disseminated through a memorandum.

Using Annex 9 of DepEd Order No. 33, s. 2014, the RPREC should officially submit to the NPREC on or before August 15, 2014 the consolidated Forms 2.0 or Reports on Ranking of Personnel for the Regional Office and all

the Division Offices within the region.

After conducting the Individual Ranking, transfer the results from the Individual PRET to Form 2.0 or Report on Ranking of Personnel. This form is also formula-based. Double-check the figures versus the results in the

Individual PRET. This form is a refined version of the form enclosed in DepEd Order No. 33, s. 2014 as Annex 7. Please use this format instead.

After filling out all the required fields in the Individual PRET, sort the Average Performance Rating (Column J) from highest to lowest. This can be done by clicking the drop-down button in Cell J9 and selecting 'Sort Largest

to Smallest' from the options. This procedure will rank the personnel within the delivery unit based on their FY 2013 average performance rating.

All formula-based columns should be copied up to the end row or last row of personnel.

Performance Ranking