INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK: A … Knowledge Governance... · They have offered their...
Transcript of INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK: A … Knowledge Governance... · They have offered their...
Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology
INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK:
A HOLISTIC MODEL FOR INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE
MANAGEMENT
Tariq Zaman
Doctor of Philosophy
(Computer Sciences)
2013
INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK:
A HOLISTIC MODEL FOR INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE
MANAGEMENT
TARIQ ZAMAN
A thesis submitted
in fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of
Doctor of Philosophy
Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology
Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
2013
i
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the thesis entitled, “Indigenous Knowledge Governance Framework:
A Holistic Model For Indigenous Knowledge Management” submitted by Mr. Tariq
Zaman for the award of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Degree at the Universiti Malaysia
Sarawak (UNIMAS), Sarawak, Malaysia is an authentic work carried by him under my
supervision and guidance.
Date: 27/ 09/ 2013
Place: Malaysia
Associate Prof. Dr. Alvin Yeo Wee
Faculty of Computer Science and Information
Technology Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS)
94300, Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia
ii
AUTHOR’S DECLARATION
I declare that the work in this thesis was carried out in accordance with the regulations of
Universiti Malaysia Sarawak. It is original and is the result of my work, unless otherwise
indicated or acknowledged as referenced work. This thesis has not been submitted at
Universiti Malaysia Sarawak or to any other academic institution or non-academic institution
for any other degree or qualification.
Name of Student: Tariq Zaman
Student ID No: 09011437
Programme Degree: PhD
Faculty: Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology
Thesis Title: Indigenous Knowledge Governance Framework: A Holistic Model For
Indigenous Knowledge Management
Signature of Student:
Date: 27/ 09/ 2013
iii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
In the past three and a half years, innumerable people have assisted me in my goal of writing a
PhD thesis. They have offered their time, knowledge, experience, wisdom and moral support.
It would be impossible to mention everyone by name, but here are a few of the individuals
who deserve acknowledgment, with sincere apologies to those who have not been mentioned
by name.
Firstly, to my supervisors Associate Professor Dr. Alvin Yeo Wee and Professor Dr.
Narayanan Kulathuramaiyer, I would like to say a big thank you. They have been a
tremendous support throughout this process, both intellectually and personally. I am much
humbled by their generosity toward me and words will never be able to do justice to what
they mean to me and have done for me over the course of my graduate career.
I would like to thank all my mentors over the years: Professor Dr. Roger Harris, Professor Dr.
Martin Nakata, Dr. Poline Bala, Dr John Phoa Chui Leong, Dr. Cheah Wai Shiang and
Professor Dr. Michael Gurstein for helping me to see the bigger picture, and Garen Jengan,
Wilson Bian Bilare’, Ezra Uda and Gerawat Nulun for spending many hours explaining the
Penans and Kelabits indigenous concepts to me. Without you, there would be no thesis.
I would also like to thank all the admin staff members and research fellows of ISITI, the folks
at Faculty of Computer Sciences and IT, and so many other colleagues at Universiti Malaysia
Sarawak, too numerous to mention, who provided support or took the time to be interested in
what I was doing, or offered some friendly words of encouragement. Thank you.
A special mention and thanks to Gary Loh Chee Wyai and Nor Fadzilah Kamarudzaman for
their immense patience and support in helping me settle in Sarawak. I do not know how I
could have managed without their help, guidance and administrative support.
iv
I would also like to acknowledge, with gratitude, the financial support of the UNIMAS
Zamalah Pascasiswazah (ZPU) scholarship and Dana Principal Investigator (DPI) funding for
my fieldwork. Without this, I would have been unable to commence or complete the project.
I am grateful to my colleagues and friends at UNIMAS namely Faheem Ullah Khan, Teh Lee
Na, Chin Soo Kuan, Siew Siang Ting, Panceras Talita, Nancy Bundan, Nasir Gul,
Muhammad Javed, Sajid Ullah Khan and the FCSIT Postgraduate Society team.
Along with these people, I also want to thank my friends Matiullah Khan and Hidayat Khan
who always believe in me and in my crazy ideas.
Along with my friends, I would like to take this opportunity to thank my family: my mother
who has been the “backbone” of my life, my brother Amer and sister Faryal, for being a
positive force in my life, my sister-in law Fouzia, for always supporting me; and lastly, my
father for not giving up on me.
Last but not least, to my wife Shaista Falak, for sharing this with me and making it possible in
many ways. I could not have done it without you. I have done this for us.
v
ABSTRACT
Development organisations acknowledge and recognise the role of Indigenous Knowledge
(IK) in solutions to local problems. It is a resource that can help produce more and better
food, maintain healthy lives, share wealth, prevent conflict, manage local affairs, and thus
contribute to global solutions. As a wide range of digital tools have been developed,
researchers and development experts are focusing on how to use information and
communication technologies (ICTs) to manage this highly-valued resource. Indigenous
knowledge mainly relies on tacit and implicit knowledge forms, which are deeply rooted in
the social and cultural context of indigenous communities. However, ICTs for Indigenous
Knowledge Management (IKM) have been designed using the conventional approach of
creating and manipulating databases of knowledge. This typical approach of IKM generates
the issues of indigenous knowledge governance, de-contextualisation and data manipulation.
Hence, the main research question of the study is “How can we introduce indigenous
knowledge governance into ICT-based Indigenous Knowledge Management System (IKMS)?”
The investigation was done in three phases: first, we explored the theoretical gaps and the
inherent structure of indigenous knowledge management system in communities. Second, we
addressed the gaps by modelling IKMS in communities and proposing a structured
Indigenous Knowledge Governance Framework (IKGF). Third, we used the framework to
model an existing IKMS and then validated the framework by using it as a base for design,
development and implementation of ICT-based IKMS.
The thesis argues that in order to design appropriate ICT tools for indigenous knowledge
management, ICT professionals need to understand the holistic indigenous knowledge
management system and then use this understanding as a basis for ICT-based IKMS’ design
and approaches.
vi
vii
ABSTRAK
Organisasi pembangunan mengiktiraf peranan Ilmu Peribumi (IK) dalam menyelesaikan
pelbagai masalah tempatan, sebagai suatu sumber yang boleh membantu menghasilkan
makanan yang lebih baik dengan kuantiti yang tinggi, mengekalkan kehidupan yang sihat,
berkongsi kekayaan, mengelakkan konflik, menguruskan hal ehwal tempatan, dan seterusnya
menyumbang kepada penyelesaian global. Manakala pelbagai alat digital telah dibangunkan,
perhatian khusus telah diberikan kepada penggunaan ICT dalam menguruskan sumber yang
sangat berharga ini. Pengetahuan Ilmu Peribumi sangat bergantung kepada bentuk
pengetahuan tersirat dan berakar umbi dalam konteks sosial dan budaya masyarakat peribumi.
Walau bagaimanapun, ICT untuk Pengurusan Ilmu Peribumi telah direka dengan mencontohi
pendekatan konvensional dalam mencipta dan memanipulasi pangkalan data. Pendekatan
biasa IKM menjana pelbagai isu tadbir urus ilmu peribumi, di nyah-kontekstualisasi dan
manipulasi data. Oleh itu, soalan utama yang menggalakkan kajian ini adalah “Bagaimana
kita boleh menggabungkan tadbir urus pengetahuan peribumi ke dalam Sistem Pengurusan
Ilmu Peribumi berasaskan ICT (SPIPI)?” Kajian telah dijalankan dalam tiga fasa: pertama,
kami telah meneroka jurang teori dan struktur yang ada pada sistem pengurusan ilmu
peribumi dalam masyarakat. Kedua, kami mengenal pasti jurang-jurang ini melalui
pemodelan IKMS dalam masyarakat dan mencadangkan Rangka Kerja Tadbir Urus Ilmu
Peribumi (IKGF) yang berstruktur. Ketiga, kami menggunakan rangka kerja tersebut untuk
pemodelan IKMS sedia ada dan kemudiannya merasmikan rangka kerja tersebut dengan
menggunakannya sebagai asas untuk merekabentuk, membangun dan melaksanakan IKMS
berasaskan ICT. Tesis ini berpendapat bahawa untuk merekabentuk alat ICT yang sesuai
untuk pengurusan pengetahuan asli, tenaga kerja ahli teknologi maklumat yang profesional
viii
memahami, sistem pengurusan ilmu peribumi yang holistik dan kemudian menggunakan
kefahaman ini sebagai asas bagi mrekabentuk teknologi dan pendekatan.
ix
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Certificate i
Author’s Declaration ii
Acknowledgements iii
Abstract v
Abstrak vii
Table of Contents ix
List of Tables xvi
List of Figures xvii
List of Abbreviations xx
List of Journal Publications, Conference Proceedings, Presentations and Awards xxii
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Background 2
1.1.1 Holistic Systems 3
1.1.2 Living Systems 3
1.2 Research Problem 5
1.3 Research Objectives 5
1.4 Research Question 6
1.5 Research Operationalisation 7
1.6 The Research Sites 8
1.6.1 Bario 8
1.6.2 Long Lamai 9
1.7 Thesis Organisation 10
x
1.8 Summary 12
Chapter 2 Literature Review 14
2.1 Definitions of Indigenous Knowledge 14
2.1.1 Non-Indigenous Viewpoint 15
2.1.2 Indigenous Viewpoint 16
2.2 Distinguishing Indigenous Knowledge from Non-Indigenous Knowledge 17
2.3 Why Study Indigenous Knowledge? 18
2.4 Indigenous Knowledge Management: The Processual Perspective 19
2.5 The Use of Information and Communication Technologies for Indigenous
Knowledge Management 20
2.6 Indigenous Knowledge Management with Knowledge-Centric Approach 22
2.6.1 World Bank's Indigenous Knowledge for Development Program 22
2.6.2 Best Practices on Indigenous Knowledge-UNESCO Program 23
2.6.3 The Traditional Knowledge Digital Library India 25
2.7 Indigenous Knowledge Management with Knower-Centric Approach 26
2.7.1 Virtual Repatriation - The Spiral of Knowledge Project 27
2.7.2 The IKM Software System 28
2.7.3 Ara Irititja Archival Project 30
2.7.4 The Mukurtu Wumpurrarni-Kari Archive 31
2.8 Factors of Appropriate Indigenous Knowledge Management System Development 33
2.9 Summary 46
xi
Chapter 3 Assessment of Indigenous Knowledge Management: Case Study of
Bario 48
3.1 The Structure of Indigenous Knowledge Management System in Communities and
Alien Conceptualisation 49
3.2 Related Work: Assessment Tools 50
3.3 Theoretical Framework 53
3.4 Methodology 56
3.5 Data Collection 58
3.6 Results 58
3.6.1 Demographics 58
3.6.2 Survey Questionnaire 59
3.6.3 Semi-Structured Interviews 62
3.7 Discussion 67
3.8 Summary 68
Chapter 4 Modelling Indigenous Knowledge Creation as a Living System 69
4.1 Knowledge Creation 69
4.1.1 Nonaka’s SECI Model 71
4.1.2 Rachel Bodle’s Model 73
4.1.3 Jackson and Klobas’ Model 74
4.1.4 Shortcomings of the Current Knowledge Creation Models 75
4.2 Knowledge Creation in Indigenous Communities 75
4.2.1 Interaction Process and Forms of Indigenous Knowledge 76
4.2.2 Action Process and Community Engagement with New Information 78
xii
4.3 Tacit, Implicit and Explicit Knowledge Creation Model 80
4.4 Case Study: Bario – Long Lamai Knowledge Creation and Exchange 83
4.4.1 Background of the Case Study 83
4.4.2 Community to Community Information Exchange and Knowledge
Creation 85
4.5 Summary 90
Chapter 5 Expanding Indigenous Knowledge Management Framework with
Notion of Indigenous Knowledge Governance 91
5.1 The Concept of Governance 92
5.2 Data, Information, Knowledge and Indigenous Knowledge Governance Concepts 94
5.3 Data, Information and Knowledge Governance Frameworks 96
5.4 Indigenous Knowledge Governance Framework 100
5.4.1 Formation of the Layered Model 101
5.4.1.1 IK Governance Layer 102
5.4.1.2 Activity Layer 104
5.4.1.3 Data Repository Layer 105
5.4.1.4 Knowledge Management Layer 106
5.4.1.5 Community Engagement Layer 106
5.4.1.6 Capital Layer 107
5.4.1.7 Cross-Cutting External Environment 108
5.5 Discussion 109
5.6 Summary 110
xiii
Chapter 6 Indigenous Knowledge Governance Framework: Case Study of the
Penan Toro 112
6.1 Indigenous Knowledge Governance Framework for Penan Toro System 112
6.1.1 Indigenous Knowledge Governance Layer 114
6.1.2 Activity Layer 117
6.1.3 Data Repository Layer 118
6.1.4 Knowledge Management Layer 119
6.1.5 Community Engagement Layer 120
6.1.7 Capital Layer 121
6.1.6 Cross-Cutting External Environment 122
6.2 Discussion 123
6.3 Summary 124
Chapter 7 Validating Indigenous Knowledge Governance Framework: Case Study
of Design, Development and Implementation of eToro 125
7.1 Generalised Digital Indigenous Knowledge Management System Development
within Indigenous Knowledge Governance Framework 125
7.1.1 Phase 1: Contextualising 127
7.1.2 Phase 2: Analysis and Design 128
7.1.3 Phase 3: Development 129
7.1.4 Phase 4: Implementation 129
7.1.5 Phase 5: Evaluation 130
7.2 Background of the Case Study 130
7.3 Methodology 131
xiv
7.3.1 Contextualising 132
7.3.2 Analysis and Design 136
7.3.3 Development 137
7.3.4 Implementation 139
7.3.5 Evaluation 140
7.4 Summary 143
Chapter 8 Conclusion 144
8.1 General Conclusion 144
8.2 Contributions 147
8.3 Future Directions 149
8.4 Summary 150
References 151
Appendix I: Indigenous Knowledge Management Diagnostic Tool 167
Appendix II: Respondents’ Profile of Survey Questionnaire 174
Appendix III: Survey Questionnaire for Assessing Bario’s Indigenous Knowledge
Management System 175
Appendix IV: Results of the Survey to Assess Bario’s Indigenous Knowledge
Management System 176
Appendix V: eToro Team Members (Community Representatives) 177
Appendix VI: Guidelines for Researchers 178
Appendix VII: Free, Prior and Informed Consent Certificate and Research Agreement 186
Appendix VIII: Data Instrument 193
xv
Appendix IX: Entity Relationship Diagram of Indigenous Content Management System 194
xvi
LIST OF TABLES
No List of Tables Page No
1 Table 1.1: Structured overview of the thesis 13
2 Table 2.1: Indigenous knowledge compared with modern
organisational knowledge 17
3 Table 2.2: User story narratives for community Agile development of
Mukurtu CMS 32
4 Table 2.3: Factors of appropriate indigenous knowledge management
system development 34
5 Table 2.4: The gaps that need to be addressed given current state of the
art solutions for indigenous knowledge management 36
6 Table 3.1: Demographic Table- Gender, Age and Occupation of
respondents 59
7 Table 3.2: Comparing indigenous knowledge management processes 60
8 Table 3.3: Indigenous knowledge management processes and assigned
scores 60
9 Table 7.1: Questions and guidelines for information and
communication technology researchers 127
10 Table 7.2: Indigenous knowledge management system’s user types 137
xvii
LIST OF FIGURES
No List of Figures Page No
1 Figure 1.1: Research operationalisation 7
2 Figure 2.1: Flowchart for selection of the best practices 24
3 Figure 2.2: Screenshot of Traditional Knowledge Digital Library 26
4 Figure 2.3: Information workflow for NMAI's Spiral of Knowledge
project 28
5 Figure 2.4: IKM system architecture and workflow 29
6 Figure 2.5: Front screen depicting restricted access to Ara Irititja database 31
7 Figure 2.6: Contested domains of local knowledge 38
8 Figure 2.7: Levels of community engagement in the system development 42
9 Figure 3.1: Knowledge management process framework 51
10 Figure 3.2: Organisation’s knowledge management model 52
11 Figure 3.3: Indigenous knowledge management processes model 55
12 Figure 3.4: Result of indigenous knowledge management processes
comparisons 61
13 Figure 3.5: Bario community governance systems 63
14 Figure 3.6: Community structure of social network in Bario 63
15 Figure 3.7: Integrated indigenous knowledge learning system 66
16 Figure 4.1: Spiral evolution of knowledge conversion and self-
transcending process 72
17 Figure 4.2: Model for mobilising tacit knowledge 73
18 Figure 4.3: The knowledge transfer model 74
19 Figure 4.4: Forms of indigenous knowledge 76
xviii
20 Figure 4.5: Distinctions between tacit, implicit and explicit knowledge 77
21 Figure 4.6: The processes of information acquisition and knowledge flow
in a community 79
22 Figure 4.7: Tacit-Implicit-Explicit knowledge creation model 80
23 Figure 5.1: The commonalities of the “governance” definitions 92
24 Figure 5.2: Decision domains for data governance 96
25 Figure 5.3: The DGI Data governance framework 97
26 Figure 5.4: OCAP framework and addressed issues 98
27 Figure 5.5: IBM Information governance framework 99
28 Figure 5.6: The logical architecture view of a layered indigenous
knowledge governance system 101
29 Figure 5.7: The relationship between indigenous knowledge governance
framework layers and the existing frameworks and models 102
30 Figure 6.1: Indigenous knowledge governance framework for Toro 113
31 Figure 6.2: Activities in Toro 117
32 Figure 7.1: Methodology to validate framework and develop indigenous
knowledge management system 126
33 Figure 7.2: Methodology to validate indigenous knowledge governance
framework for eToro 132
34 Figure 7.3: indigenous knowledge governance framework for eToro 133
35 Figure 7.4: Components and services of indigenous knowledge
management system 139
36 Figure 7.5 Community meetings: Discussion on eToro and selection of
community representative team 141
xix
37 Figure 7.6 Users’ satisfaction level 141
38 Figure 8.1: Factors of appropriate indigenous knowledge management
system development, indigenous knowledge governance framework and
eToro 146
xx
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
Abbreviation Word
APQC American Productivity & Quality Center
CSCCP Culturally Sensitive Collections Care Program
DGI Data Governance Institute
FP&IC Free, Prior and Informed Consent
IBK Indigenous Botanical Knowledge
iCMS indigenous Content Management System
ICT Information and communication Technology
IK Indigenous Knowledge
IKG Indigenous Knowledge Governance
IKGF Indigenous Knowledge Governance Framework
IKM Indigenous Knowledge Management
IKMS Indigenous Knowledge Management System
IP Intellectual Property
IPR Intellectual Property Rights
ISITI-CoERI Institute of Social Informatics and Technological Innovations-Centre of
Excellence for Rural Informatics
IT Information Technology
JDBC Java Database Connectivity
JKKK Jawatankuasa Kemajuan dan Keselamatan Kampung (Village’s
Development and Safety Committee)
KGA Knowledge Governance Approach
KM Knowledge Management
xxi
KMAT Knowledge Management Assessment Tool
KMD Knowledge Management Diagnostic
NMAI National Museum of the American Indian
OCAP Ownership, Control, Access and Possession
ODK Open Data Kit
SDLC System Development Life Cycle
SECI Socialization, Externalization, Combination and Internalization
TEK Traditional Ecological Knowledge
TIE Tacit, Implicit and Explicit
TKDL Traditional Knowledge Digital Library
TKRC Traditional Knowledge Resource Classification
UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
UNIMAS Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
XML eXtensible Markup Language