indian gaap v/s us gaap

download indian gaap v/s us gaap

of 32

description

indian gaap and us gaap

Transcript of indian gaap v/s us gaap

  • 5/20/2018 indian gaap v/s us gaap

    1/32

    INDIAN GAAP Vs US GAAP

    Ronita A (1)Shashikant S(45)

    AshutoshM(58)

    Shraddha T(47)

    Kiran P (35)

  • 5/20/2018 indian gaap v/s us gaap

    2/32

    Introduction to GAAP

    Indian Accounting Standards (AS) & US GAAP

    Why US GAAP

    Comparison between Indian GAAP Vs US GAAP AS2 Vs ARB 43Valuation of Inventories

    AS28 Vs SFAS 144Impairment of Assets

    AS17 Vs SFAS-131 - Segmental Reporting

    AS21 Vs SFAS-94 - Consolidation of Balance Sheet

    Agenda

  • 5/20/2018 indian gaap v/s us gaap

    3/32

    What is GAAP?

    Books of OriginalEntriesSubsidiaryBooks

    Ledger Accounts

    AccountingPractices /

    AccountingStandards

    (GAAP)

    Profit & LossAccountsBalance SheetCash flowStatementsEtc.

    Input / Row

    MaterialProcess Output

    Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) :-

    Accounting rules used to prepare, present and report financial

    statements

    For a wide variety of entities, including publicly traded and

    privately held companies, non-profit organizations, and

    government authorities.

  • 5/20/2018 indian gaap v/s us gaap

    4/32

    PRINCIPLES OF GAAP GAAP is based on a few principles which include

    Consistency

    Relevance

    Reliability

    Comparability

    Indian Accounting Standards - Principle based

    In India the Institute of Chartered Accounts of India (ICAI) isresponsible to frame guideline and standards relating tovarious accounting issues.

    US GAAP - Rule-based

    In US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)establishes GAAP for public and private companies.

    PRINCIPLES OF GAAP

  • 5/20/2018 indian gaap v/s us gaap

    5/32

    There are significant differences between IndianGAAP and US GAAP. US GAAP stipulate stringentaccounting treatment as well as disclosure norms,whereas their Indian GAAP in many cases have

    relaxed requirements e.g. AS 3,AS 17,AS 18.Similarly, there are several areas where no

    Accounting Standard have been issued by ICAI .These differences lead to wide variations whenFinancial Results of Indian Companies arecomputed under US GAAP and it is found thatProfits computed under US GAAP are generallylower.

    Why Compare?

  • 5/20/2018 indian gaap v/s us gaap

    6/32

    Indian GAAP & US GAAP

    In Indian GAAP financial statements are preparedaccording to the principal of conservatism which states that

    Anticipate no profits and provide for all losses

    And in US GAAP conservatism is not considered- Revenueis recognized as and when it is earned or realized or

    realizable.

    For example a media company recognizes revenue when

    the ads are aired even if the payment is not received or

    where payment is received in advance.

  • 5/20/2018 indian gaap v/s us gaap

    7/32

    Valuation of Inventories (AS2 Vs ARB43)

    Inventories includes assets that are held in the normalcourse of business for sale or assets in process ofproduction for such sale or materials consumed forsuch production process.

    INDIAN GAAP AS 2 US GAAP ARB-43

    BASIS OF MEASUREMENT As per Indian GAAP inventories are valued at

    lower of cost or Net realizable value.

    As per us GAAP the prime basis for

    accounting for inventory is cost.

    CALCULATION OF NET REALISABLE VALUE (NRV)

    NRV = SELLING PRICESELLING EXPENSES NRV = SELLING PRICESELLING EXPENSES

    PROFIT.

    METHODS USED FOR VALUATION

    FIFO, WEIGHTED AVG COST METHOD FIFO, LIFO, WEIGHTED AVG COST METHOD

    Companies following above methods - Aditya

    Birla Nuvo Ltd, Pidlite, Tata Motors

    Multinational companies like ABBOTT,

    Apple, American express, Microsoft,

    Verizon, Pfizer, Wallmart (LIFO), .

  • 5/20/2018 indian gaap v/s us gaap

    8/32

    Impairment of Assets (AS28 Vs SFAS144)

    If recoverable amount of an asset < carrying amount

    Carrying amount should be reduced to its recoverable

    amountThis reduction is an impairment of loss

  • 5/20/2018 indian gaap v/s us gaap

    9/32

    Illustration

    Company pu rchased $2,000,000of equipment

    (to be used in the production of a new type of laser printer)

    Depreciationis determined over a useful l i fe of six y ears

    At the beginn ing of year 3:

    - the machine's book va lue: reducedby accumulated depreciat ionto $1,400,000 (given)

    At that time,

    - new techno logyis developed

    causing a significant reduction in the selling price

    as well as a reduction in anticipated demand for the product.

  • 5/20/2018 indian gaap v/s us gaap

    10/32

    Impairment of Assets (AS28 Vs SFAS144)

    Management estimates that the equipment will beuseful for only two more yearsand will have nosignificant residual value.

    Management must decide if the events occu rr ing inyear 3warrant a wri te-downof the assetbelow$1,400,000.

    A wri te-downwould be appropr iateif the companydecided that it would be unable to ful ly recoverthisamount through fu ture use.

  • 5/20/2018 indian gaap v/s us gaap

    11/32

    Impairment of Assets (AS28 Vs SFAS144)

    Impairment loss : recognised as an expense in statementof profit and loss immediately

    For revalued assets : deducted from revaluation reserve.

    A disc losu re no te is needed to descr ibe the

    impairment loss .

    A description of the impaired asset or asset group

    The facts and circumstances leading to the impairment The amount of the loss if not separately disclosed on

    the face of the income statement

    The method used to determine fair value.

  • 5/20/2018 indian gaap v/s us gaap

    12/32

    Applicability

    Applicable to Not Applicable to

    Fixed assests

    Intangible assests

    Inventories

    Asset arising from

    construction contract

    Financial asset &contractual right toreceive cash (debtors)

    Standard is effective from 1-4-2005exception : effective from 1-4-20041) whose equity shares are listed in stock exchange or in theprocess of listing2) whose turnover exceeds 50 crores

  • 5/20/2018 indian gaap v/s us gaap

    13/32

    Todays Discussion

    PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT & Fin ite-

    Life INTANGIBLE Assets

    Indefin ite L ife INTANGIBLE Assets OTHER

    THAN Goodwi l l

    GOODWILL

    REVERSAL

  • 5/20/2018 indian gaap v/s us gaap

    14/32

    PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT & Finite-Life INTANGIBLEAssets

    The Jasmine Tea Company has a factory that has significantlydecreased in value due to technological innovations in theindustry.

    U.S. GAAP: - there is no im pairment loss

    because the sum of undiscounted future cash flowsexceed the book value

    INDIAN GAAP: there is impairment loss

    book valueof $18.5 m ill io nThe recoverable amountis $16 mil l io n,

    Because its higher of :

    NPV(value-in-use) : ($16 million)

    NSP(fair value less costs to sell) : ($15.5 million).

    Impairment loss : $2.5 m ill ion. ( 18.516 )

  • 5/20/2018 indian gaap v/s us gaap

    15/32

    Indefinite Life INTANGIBLE Assets OTHER THANGoodwill

    U.S. GAAP : The impairment loss is measured as thedifference between book value and fair value,

    While calculating NSP : cost of d ispos alis reduced onlywhen theasset is to be dispo sed off

    If certain criteria are met, indefinite-life intangible assets should becombined for the required annual impairment test.

    INDIAN GAAP : Impairment loss is the difference between book

    value and the recoverable amount (higher of NPV or NSP )

    NSP is calculated by reducing cost of disposal from its Fair valueirrespective of the fact whether asset is to be disposed off or not

    indefinite-life intangible assets may not be combined with otherindefinite-life intangible assets for the required annual impairment test.

  • 5/20/2018 indian gaap v/s us gaap

    16/32

    GOODWILL

    U.S. GAAP : only Bottom-Uptest is followed

    2010

    Upjane Corp.

    $400 million

    $100 million

    F.V.

    Goodwill

    Pharmacopia

    acquisition $500 million

  • 5/20/2018 indian gaap v/s us gaap

    17/32

    GOODWILL

    End of 2011

    Pharmacopia

    C.V. (including goodwill : $100)

    F.V. (except goodwill)

    F.V.$440 million$360 million

    $335 million

    Impairment test performed byUpjane corp

  • 5/20/2018 indian gaap v/s us gaap

    18/32

    GOODWILL

    Step I : Recoverability

    Book value (440) > Fair value (360)

    impairment loss is indicated

  • 5/20/2018 indian gaap v/s us gaap

    19/32

    GOODWILL

    implied F.V. of Goodwill = units F.V. - FV except GW

    $360 million $335 million

    $25 million

    Therefore, Implied Fair Value of Goodwill = $25 million

  • 5/20/2018 indian gaap v/s us gaap

    20/32

    GOODWILL

    BV of Pharmacopia s net assets : $440 million(including $100 goodwill asset)

    BV of Goodwill = $100 million

    Impairment loss on GW = BV - implied FV

    - $25 million$100 million

    $75 million

    Year 2011

  • 5/20/2018 indian gaap v/s us gaap

    21/32

    SL

    RecognizedGoodwill @ 25 lacs

    acquired

    X Y Z

    77 lacs

    C.V. of assets (except Goodwill) of X,Y, Z

    ZYX20 lacs 25 lacs 30 lacs

    19 lacsR.V. (estimated)

    2001

    INDIAN GAAP : if required, both Bottom-Up& Top-downare followed

    Senario:-

    Goodwill can not be allocated on a reasonable and consistent basis to

    the CGU under consideration AL

  • 5/20/2018 indian gaap v/s us gaap

    22/32

    GOODWILL ...(Contd.....)

    1st stage: AL per forms bo t tom up test for X

    X

    20 lacs

    19 lacs

    1 lacs

    C.V. Except Goodwill

    Less R.V.

    Impairment loss

    allocated to assets of Div.X (except Goodwill)

    Year 2004

  • 5/20/2018 indian gaap v/s us gaap

    23/32

    GOODWILL ...(Contd.....)

    C.V. (except goodwill)

    5 lacs

    80 lacs

    C.V. Goodwill

    Total C.V.

    revised C.V. 79 lacs

    R.V. 77 lacs

    Impairment loss 2 lacs

    Larger CGU : SL

    X Y Z

    20 lacs

    2nd stage: AL per forms Top down test for X

    25 lacs 30 lacs

  • 5/20/2018 indian gaap v/s us gaap

    24/32

    GOODWILL ...(Contd.....)

    Therefore, Goodwill should be written down to 3 lac

    In the P & L account of year 2004,

    AL recognises impairment loss on account of goodwill at Rs. 3 lac &

    Impairment loss of other asset of division X at Rs. 1 lac

  • 5/20/2018 indian gaap v/s us gaap

    25/32

    REVERSAL

    U.S. GAAP : Prohibits the reversal of impairment loss

    INDIAN GAAP : It is permitted.

    External sources of information

    The assets market value has increasedsignificantly during the period

    Signi f icant changes du r ing the per iod

    Changes in discount rateused in calculating the assets value in use

    Internal sources of information

    signi f icant ch anges with a favourable effect on the enterpr ise

    Evidence is avai lable from internal repo rt ing

  • 5/20/2018 indian gaap v/s us gaap

    26/32

    Segmental Reporting (AS17 Vs SFAS131)

    To Better understand the performance of theenterprise

    To Better Assess the risks and returns of the

    enterprise To make more informed Judgement about the

    enterprise as wholeICAI FASB

    As per Indian GAAP, Segmental Information

    should be prepared in confirmative with AS1 (

    Accounting policies)

    As per US GAAP doesn't prescribe the

    accounting policies to be used.

    As per Indian GAAP, Segmental &

    Geographical reporting in compulsory

    As per US GAAP, Presentation of only operating

    Segmental reporting is compulsory

  • 5/20/2018 indian gaap v/s us gaap

    27/32

    Consolidated Balance Sheet (AS21 Vs SFAS 94)

    .ICAI FASB

    Two major aspects:-

    1) Control

    2) Requirement

    Consolidated Balance Sheet : - A financial statements of a parent and itssubsidiaries as a single economic entity.

  • 5/20/2018 indian gaap v/s us gaap

    28/32

    Major Difference betweenAS21 Vs SFAS 94

    ICAI FASB

    Indirect control in companies are

    considered as subsidiaries.

    Only majority owned companies are

    considered as subsidiaries.

    IC A I- S hould be part of C B S F A S B - c an not be part of C B S

    X

    1) C ontrol

  • 5/20/2018 indian gaap v/s us gaap

    29/32

    Major Difference betweenAS21 Vs SFAS 94

    ICAI FASB

    As per Indian Balance Sheet - 69

    subsidiaries are taken in to accounts

    for preparation of Consolidated

    Balance Sheet (CBS)

    As per US GAAP only - 65 subsidiaries

    are taken in to account for preparation

    of Consolidated Balance Sheet (CBS)

    Consolidated Balance Sheet of Tata Motors Ltd. FY 11-12

    Figures in Rs. Crores Indian Balance Sheet 20-F US Balance Sheet Difference

    Assets 145,382.64 142,921.26 2,461.38

    Equity & Liabilities 145,382.64 142,921.26 2,461.38

    Net Profit 13,516.50 11,644.04 1,872Figures in Rs. Crores

  • 5/20/2018 indian gaap v/s us gaap

    30/32

    Major Difference betweenAS21 Vs SFAS 94

    ICAI FASB

    Standalone statement is mandatory

    requirement as per ICAI

    Standalone statement is not permitted

    as per FASB

    As per ICAI, Only listed companies are

    required to prepare Consolidated

    Balance Sheet (CSB) as per format

    prescribed.

    US GAAP Consolidated Balance Sheet is

    compulsorily requirement.

    2) R equirement

  • 5/20/2018 indian gaap v/s us gaap

    31/32

    Major Difference betweenAS21 Vs SFAS 94

    ICAI FASB

    Both, Standalone & Consolidated Balance

    sheets are required as per Indian GAAP,

    hence it provides more information to stake

    holders.

    Only consolidated statement might mislead

    to stake holders in absence of Standalone

    statement.

    Consolidated balance sheet is inflated with

    figures even though company doesn't have

    majority contol in subsidairy's business

    affairs.

    Figures of only majority stake holding are

    included in CBS, Hence it will reduce the

    chances of inflating CBS.

    Observation

  • 5/20/2018 indian gaap v/s us gaap

    32/32

    Thank you..