Indian Architecture in Concept and Execution Case Study of Dravidian Temple Architecture

16
Indian architecture in concept and execution Case Study of Dravidian Temple Architecture

description

A presentation on Dravidian architecture

Transcript of Indian Architecture in Concept and Execution Case Study of Dravidian Temple Architecture

  • Indian architecture in concept and execution

    Case Study of Dravidian Temple Architecture

  • Types of Indian Temple Architecture

    Nagara

    Dravida

    Kalinga

    Maru-Gujara

    Chalukya Hoysala

  • Indian Temple Architecture

    FEATURES

    Gopuram: an elaborate gateway of south Indian temples, in the form of a tower.

    Jagati: the platform on which the temple is erected.

    Mandapa: a pillared hall for public rituals.

    Antarala: an antechamber between the garbhagriha and the mandapa in north Indian temples.

    Garbhagriha: the sanctum sanctorum where the presiding deity is kept.

    Shikhara or Vimana: the tower over the garbhagriha

  • Dravidian vs. Nagara Temple Architecture

    Dravidian architecture important features are the vimana and gopuram. Vimana is tall pyramidal tower consisting of several progressively smaller storeys, the peak of the vimanas is known as sikhara in south indian temples.

    Gopurams the welcoming gate became taller and taller overpowering the main shrine and its super structure and dominating the whole temple complex.

    In Nagara the beehived shaped tower is the most distinguished element called as shikhara.

    The gateways are in the North and they are plain simple and small.

    Nagara style vs Dravidian style

  • TEMPLES OF SOUTH INDIA

  • Introduction to Dravidaian Temple Architecture

    Pallava (600-900AD)

    Chola (900-1150 AD)

    Pandya (1100-1350 AD)

    Vijayanagara (1350-1565 AD)

    Nayaka (from 1600 AD)

  • Pallavas vs. Cholas

    Dravidian architectures foundation laid

    Pallavas great patrons of art and architecture

    They used architecture to legitimize their rule by richly endowing the shrines and by naming the edifices after their kings. As a result, a complex relationship began to grow between the temple, community and the king.

    Two phases

    Mahendra and Mammala (610-690)

    Rajasimha and Nandivarman (690-900)

    Golden age for Dravidian architecture.

    Proclaim their power through arts

    Used temple to make unequivocal statement about their political hegemony.

    Brihadisvara temple (a royal monument of power)

  • FACTS:

    Built by Raja Raja Chola

    One of tallest (210 fts high) and largest tower in India

    Temple was built per ancient texts called Vaastu Shastras and Agamas

    Brihadeeshwara Temple

    FEATURES

    Axial and Symmetrical geometry rules temple layout.

    The Kumbam (Kalasha or Chikharam) (apex or the bulbous structure on the top) of the temple is carved out of a single stone and it weighs around 80 tons

    Kumbam raised to its present height by dragging on an inclined plane of 6.44 km

    Inner mandapa which is surrounded by massive walls that are divided into levels by sharply cut sculptures and pilasters providing deep bays and recesses

  • Brihadeeshwara Temple DISTINCT FEATURES

    The two large gopuras in line are first introduced here in Dravidian architecture.

    The vimana is dvitala (double storied).

    In the Dravida style, the Karuvarai takes the form of a miniature vimana with other features exclusive to southern Indian temple architecture such as the inner wall together with the outer wall creating a pradakshina around the garbhagriha for pradakshina. The entrance is highly decorated. The inside chamber housing the image of the god is the sanctum sanctorum, the garbhagriha The garbhagriha is square and sits on a plinth, its location calculated to be a point of total equilibrium and harmony as it is representative of a microcosm of the universe. In the center is placed the image of the deity.

  • Knowledge Systems

    Vaastu Sastra Floor Plan

    Cosmic Being

    Trigonometry Placing of Kumbam on top of the pyramidal tower

    Astronomy Shadow of gopuram never falls on the ground

  • Vastupurushamandala and Temple Plan

    Vastupurushamandala derived from 3 words: Vastu refers to physical environment

    Purusha refers to cosmic being

    Mandala refers to diagram

    Square is a very fundamental form in Hindu philosophy.

    Mandala is actually a square subdivided into smaller squares in the form of a grid with each unit clearly making area of Gods.

    Brihadeeshwara Temple as Padmagarbhamandala (16*16)

    Most common mandalas are 64 and 81, these are common in Dravidian temples.

  • Brihadeeshwara Temple: Vaastu Sastra

    FLOOR PLAN

  • Vertical Symbolism

    The structure is so huge and it could signify Mt.Kailash

  • Horizontal Symbolism

  • Trigonometry

    66m

    It is hypothesized that the kumbam which weighs over 80 tonnes is of single rock and was rised to its present height by dragging on an inclined plane of 6.44km.

    A temporary inclined plane has been constructed and demolished after construction.

    Elephants have been used to drag the stone up this slope.

  • Mathematical Calculations

    Sin=66/6440 = 0.01

    F=m*g*sin

    m=72574.8 kg

    g=9.81 F=72574.8*9.81*0.010

    F=7296.4N approx. 7.3kN

    Weight a normal elephant can lift 300kg-500kg No of elephants used: 7300/400=19

    Force the inclined plane has to withstand: No: of elephants*mass*g*sin+ Weight of kumbam

    19*5000*9.81*0.01+7300=16619.5 N= 16.7kN

    INFERENCES This shows how much force the temporary

    inclined plane must withstand. Cholas should have taken huge amount of

    pain in constructing this. Creating a temporary structure that could

    withstand this much Force is a big deal. This clearly shows how Cholas were

    distinctly ahead in architecture and practical use of mathematics.

  • Astronomy

    They should have had a decent knowledge about path of the sun.

    Combining this knowledge with their expertise in architecture they created a marvel.

    Vimana doesnt cast a shadow on temple premises.

    This not only shows their skill set but also the planning Cholas possessed.

    The architect Kunjara Mallan Raja Raja Perunthachan should have thought of all these before hand and then executed it.

  • Patterns in South Indian Temples Sr. no Temples of South India Period In Plan Area Ratio

    Total Area of the

    temple (sq.m)

    Total Wall

    Area of the

    temple (sq.m)

    Total Wall

    Area/Total, Total

    Area of the

    temple (%)

    1 Ladh khan temple, Aihole, Karnataka 5th cent. 291.24 43.35 14.88%

    2 Durga temple, Aihole, Karnataka 6th cent. 258.35 45.42 17.58%

    3 Temple of papanatha, Pattadakal, Karnataka 7th cent. 199.42 58.07 29.11%

    4 Temple of virupaksha, Pattadakal,Karnaataka 8th cent. 162.8 55.12 33.84%

    5 Shore temple, Mahabalipuram, Tamil Nadu 8th cent. 32.91 20.59 62.56%

    6 Jaina temple, Pattadakal, Karnataka 9th cent. 148.81 49.82 33.47%

    7Brihadeshvara temple, Thanjavur, Tamil

    Nadu11th cent. 2179.29 737.15

    33.82%

    8 Mallikarjuna temple, Sudi, Karnataka 11th cent. 176.19 78.51 44.59%

    9 Gangaiacondacholapuran temple, Karnataka 11th cent. 2084 729.49 34.98%

    10 Jain temple, Lakkundi, Karnataka 11th cent. 198.11 73.23 36.96%

    11 Main Shrine , Itagi, Koppal district, Karnataka 12th cent. 378.72 131.98 34.98%

    12Temple of kallesvara,

    Kukkanur,Karnataka12th cent. 459.92 232.63 50.56%

    13Virupaksha temple complex,

    Hampi,Karnataka12th cent. 336.03 125.64 37.38%

    14 Kesava temple, Aralguppe, Karnataka 13th cent. 472.12 214.6 45.43%

    15 Isvara temple, Arisikerai, Karnataka 13th cent. 486.78 148.93 30.48%

    16 Chandrasekara temple, Hampi, Karnataka 14th cent. 335.56 110.8 33.01%

    17 Chandikeshawa temple, Hampi, Karnatka 14th cent. 106.21 36.62 34.42%

    18 Vitthal temple, Hampi, Karnataka 15th cent. 769.04 397.54 49.95%

  • Patterns in Dravidian Architecture

    Time vs. Area of Temple

  • Patterns in Dravidian Architecture

    Time vs. Height of Temples

  • Conclusions