India October Sajjid Chinoy
description
Transcript of India October Sajjid Chinoy
Presentation3
Sajjid Chinoy(91) 22-6157- [email protected]
India in 2014: an economy in transition
Toshi Jain(91)-22 6157 [email protected]
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
ST
RIC
TL
YP
RIV
AT
EA
ND
CO
NF
IDE
NT
IAL
Presentation3
India in 2014: an economy in transition� New government pursues a gradualist approach; no big bang reforms; early focus on fixing the plumbing
� Growth to accelerate only modestly; expect a moderation in the coming quarters
� But macro stability sustains:
� Sharp correction in commodity prices provides a
1
� Sharp correction in commodity prices provides a powerful ToT shocks
� CAD tracking less than 1.5% of GDP ($27 bn)
� Fisc pressures release as oil subsidies fall
� RBI underscores its intent on inflation targeting; markets gradually getting convinced
� Rupee outperforms; but positioning and fair-value suggest gradual depreciation
Presentation3
A historic mandateA historic mandate
2
Presentation3
Enthusiasm at unprecedented highsIN
DIA
: BO
UN
CIN
G T
O M
ALA
ISE
3
Source : ECI
Presentation3
Redrawing the political mapIN
DIA
: BO
UN
CIN
G T
O M
ALA
ISE
4
Presentation3
Young voters go 2 -1 in favour of the BJP
30
35
40
45
BJP
INC
vote share, %
And also dominated youth
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
18-22 23-25 26-35 36-45 46-55 56+
Source : CSDS Post -poll
Presentation3
A 100 small stepsA 100 small steps
6
Presentation3
Why no big -bang ?
� A technical Constraint
�Big ticket items are on con-current list and necessarily involve the States:
� Land Acquisition, GST, Labour Laws
�Food Inflation (APMC Act)
7
�Rajya Sabha constraint
� A strategic choice
�Political economy of reforms: gradualism works if sequenced optimally
� Diesel versus LPG
� Multi-brand FDI, railway passes
Presentation3
The first 100 days
� Massive shake-up of bureacracy
� FDI reforms
� Insurance, Defence, Railways
� Efforts to fight food inflation
�MSPs, anti-hoarding, essential commodities, states to import; effort to reform FCI
8
� Online green clearances
� Increase coal mined ceiling from each pit
�Prodding state government to gradually dismantle labour laws
� Easing preemption on infrastructure financing
� More funds for warehousing, cold storage, and highways in Budget
� Pushing financial inclusion (loan mela ?)
�Finding political cover through an expenditure management commission
Presentation3
Labour Reform: the dark horse
60
70
80
90
Employment share by firm size in china and India, 2005Number of workers
India
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
9
0
10
20
30
40
50
<8 8-18 19-50 51-200 201-500 501-2000 >2000
China
Source : Hasan and Jandoc, Arvind panagariya & Jagdish Baghwati - The emerging giant
Presentation3
What to expect when you are expecting� GST Bill introduced in Winter Session of Parliament
� A Coal Policy
� Exemptions to Land Acquisition Policy increased (PPP, Defense)
� Carriage and Content Law Introduced in Winter
10
� Carriage and Content Law Introduced in Winter Session
� Preliminary report of Expenditure Management Commission – movement towards cash transfers
� Buffer Stock Management
� Passage of FDI in Insurance
Presentation3
The risks of gradualism� Political Capital Decays Over Time
� What if markets lose patience?
�Capital market buoyancy key part of strategy
11
� Hostage to electoral setbacks
�Bye elections
Presentation3NDA does not have the numbers in the RajyaSabha but…..
UPA, 79
Number of seats
But in the Rajya Sabha its a different story
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
12
NDA, 62
Others, 109
Source : Rajya Sabha website
Presentation3
…this will not be a binding constraint
� Except for constitutional amendments, if the LokSabha passes a bill and the Rajya Sabha rejects it, the government can call for a joint session of Parliament
� Bill will pass if the joint session passes it with a simple majority
13
simple majority
� Currently the NDA (335+62 = 397) almost has a simple majority in any joint session (795 seats). So passage through joint session very likely
� However, this is not true for a GST, which is a constitutional amendment, and requires passage by 2/3rds majority in each house of Parliament
Presentation3
Growth: a modest cyclical upturnGrowth: a modest cyclical upturn
14
Presentation3
Modest industrial recovery loses steam
0
5
10
q/q, saar
Industrial Production
53
55
Index
Export orders rise sharplyManufacturing PMI
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
15
Source : CSO, Markit, JPM Calculations
-15
-10
-5
0
Jul-
12
Oct-
12
Jan-1
3
Apr-
13
Jul-
13
Oct-
13
Jan-1
4
Apr-
14
Jul-
14
47
49
51
Jun-1
2
Sep-1
2
Dec-1
2
Mar-
13
Jun-1
3
Sep-1
3
Dec-1
3
Mar-
14
Jun-1
4
Sep-1
4
Presentation3
Mixed signals from domestic demand
5
10
15
Auto production
% oya, 3mma
Auto sales and production
-5
0
5
10
%oya, 3mma
But non-durables to get a kick from strong monsoonConsumer Durables
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
16
-10
-5
0
Dec
12
Feb 1
3
Apr
13
Jun 1
3
Aug 1
3
Oct
13
Dec
13
Feb 1
4
Apr
14
Jun 1
4
Aug 1
4
Auto sales
-20
-15
-10
-5
Ap
r-12
Ju
l-12
Oct-1
2
Jan
-13
Ap
r-13
Ju
l-13
Oct-1
3
Jan
-14
Ap
r-14
Ju
l-14
Source : CEIC, JPM Calculations
Presentation3
Mixed signals from domestic demand
20
40
60
q/q, saar
India: Capital Goods Production
16
18
20
22
Credit growth
q/q saar %
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
17
-60
-40
-20
0
Apr-1
2
Jul-
12
Oct-1
2
Jan-1
3
Apr-1
3
Jul-
13
Oct-1
3
Jan-1
4
Apr-1
4
Jul-
14
6
8
10
12
14
Fe
b 1
2
Aug
12
Fe
b 1
3
Aug
13
Fe
b 1
4
Aug
14
Source : CSO, CEIC, RBI, JPM Calculations
Presentation3
External demand is driving growth
3
5
8
12
16
% oya, 3mma
India: IP and exports
Exports
IP
% oya, 3mma
52
54
56
58
Index
Export orders rise sharplyNew export order Index
18
-3
-1
1
-4
0
4
8
Ju
n 1
3
Aug
13
Oct
13
De
c 13
Feb 1
4
Apr
14
Ju
n 1
4
Aug
14
44
46
48
50
52
Sep-1
1
De
c-11
Mar-
12
Jun-1
2
Sep-1
2
De
c-12
Mar-
13
Jun-1
3
Sep-1
3
De
c-13
Mar-
14
Jun-1
4
Sep-1
4
Source : CSO, MOC,CEIC, Markit, JPM Calculations
Presentation3
Drivers of 2Q growth are transient
8
10
%oya
India: Composition of 2Q growth
7
9
11
India: GDP ex agri ex govt. expenditure
% q/q, saar
19
0
2
4
6
Agri govt. exp Industry Private services
-1
1
3
5
7
11Q2 11Q4 12Q2 12Q4 13Q2 13Q4 14Q2
Source : CSO, CEIC, JPM Calculations
Presentation3
The structural heavy -lifting remainsThe structural heavy -lifting remains
20
Presentation3
Its all about productivity
3
3
4
India: Productivity growth (TFP)
% oya
8
9
10
35
38
41
as % of GDP
Growth and Investments
Investments
% oya
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
21
1
2
2
3
00 02 04 06 08 10 12 143
4
5
6
7
23
26
29
32
02 04 06 08 10 12
GDP growth
Source : CSO, CEIC, JPM Calculations
Presentation3
…underpinned by lower corporate investment
16
20
as % of GDP
Household + Valuable
Its the compsoition, silly!
3
4
13
15
17% of GDP % oya 5-year - avg
Equipment investment
Equipment investment
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
22
4
8
12
02 04 06 08 10 12
Corporate
Public
0
1
2
7
9
11
13
79 83 87 91 95 99 03 07 11
Productivity
Source : CSO, CEIC, JPM Calculations
Presentation3Constrained, in turn, by implementation bottlenecks
8
10
12
Despite recent clearances stalled projects remain high
Value
% of projects under implementation
2.5
3
3.5
Completed projects slump
% completed every quarter (3qma)
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
23
0
2
4
6
Mar-9
7
Mar-9
9
Mar-0
1
Mar-0
3
Mar-0
5
Mar-0
7
Mar-0
9
Mar-1
1
Mar-1
3Volume
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
Source : CSO,CMIE, JPM Calculations
Presentation3Almost half the slowdown due to implementation bottlenecks and associated loss of confidence
ppts
Actual Growth Slowdown (ex agri, com serv) 695.0
Slowdown that can be explained 660.0
percent explained by (%)
Slowing Trading Partner Growth 10.0
Decomposition of Slowdown from 2010 to 2013
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
24
Slowing Trading Partner Growth 10.0
Higher Oil Prices ($) 11.0
Real Interest Rates 35.0
Implementation Bottlenecks (proxied by stalled projects) 28.0
Investor Confidence (proxied by projects starts) 16.0
Supply Bottlenecks and investor confidence 44.0
Source : JPM Calculations
Presentation3
CCI has undoubtedly made progress…
4,000
5,000
6,000
Rs. bn
India : Progress under CCI
Under consideration
Approved
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
25
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
Gas Power Steel Others
Source : CMIE
Presentation3
But the bottleneck is at the state level !! IN
DIA
: BO
UN
CIN
G T
O M
ALA
ISE
26
Source : CMIE, JPM Calculations
Presentation3
Coal production has come to a standstill
8
10
12% oya
India: coal india production
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
27
-2
0
2
4
6
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14
Source : CEIC, JPM Calculations
Presentation3
And SEB’s remain a key drag
72
74
76
India: all India thermal power plants PLF
%
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
4
5
5
India : SEB's revenues and cost
Rs/kWh
Average revenue
Average cost of service
Gap between cost & revenue
Rs/kWh
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
28
64
66
68
70
FY12 FY13 FY140.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
2
3
3
4
FY05 FY07 FY09 FY11 FY13E
revenue realization
Source : Central Electricity Authority
Presentation3
Financing remains a constraint
2.5
3.0
3.5
Debt/equity ratio
Balance sheet stress in power sector
2.0
2.5
3.0
Debt/equity ratio
Balance sheet stress in construction & engineering sector (including roads)
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
29
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
FY
02
FY
03
FY
04
FY
05
FY
06
FY
07
FY
08
FY
09
FY
10
FY
11
FY
12
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
FY
02
FY
03
FY
04
FY
05
FY
06
FY
07
FY
08
FY
09
FY
10
FY
11
FY
12
Note : Debt/equity ratio of BSE500 companies, Bloomberg
Presentation3Debt-equity ratios at decade highs in infrastructure
1.2
1.4
1.6
Debt/equity ratio
Balance sheet stress in telecom sector
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
Debt/equity ratio
Balance sheet stress in transportation sector(including airline, ports)
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
30
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
FY
02
FY
03
FY
04
FY
05
FY
06
FY
07
FY
08
FY
09
FY
10
FY
11
FY
12
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
FY
02
FY
03
FY
04
FY
05
FY
06
FY
07
FY
08
FY
09
FY
10
FY
11
FY
12
Note : Debt/equity ratio of BSE500 companies, Bloomberg
Presentation3
Resulting in bank impaired loans pile up
8
10
12
NPL Restructured loans
% of loans
India: Banking Sector Stress
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
31
0
2
4
6
Mar 08 Mar 09 Mar 10 Mar 11 Mar 12 Mar 13 Sep 13
Source : RBI
Presentation3
Some light at the end of the tunnel
600
700
800
900
1,000
Rs. bn
New capital issuance : primary markets
Rs. bn, 12M rolling
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
32
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
02 04 06 08 10 12 14
Source : CEIC
Presentation3
InflationInflation
33
Presentation3
A fortuitous convergence of interestA fortuitous convergence of interest
34
Presentation3The changed political economy of food inflation
Development
Price rise
Single most important issue on which you vote in 2014 elections?
Kerala
Maharashtra
Gujarat
Which state has best on development indicators ?
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
35
0 10 20
Employment
Corruption
(% of the respondents)
0 10 20
Karnataka
Kerala
(% of the respondents)
Source : CSDS Pre -poll
Presentation3
Inflation was also most important voting issue in 3 of the 4 states
0 10 20 30
Governance
Corruption
Employments
Price rise
(% of the respondents)
Madhya Pradesh
0 10 20
Corruption
Governance
Unemployment
Price rise
(% of the respondents)
Rajasthan
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
36
(% of the respondents)(% of the respondents)
0 20 40 60
Water problem
Development
Corruption
Price rise
(% of the respondents)
Delhi
0 5 10 15
Roads
Employment
Price rise
Development
(% of the respondents)
Chhattisgarh
Source : CSDS
Presentation3
Recent voting correlated with inflation
10
11
5 year average inflation* oya %
Rajasthan
State wise- growth - inflation dynamics
States worse than trend
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
37
6
7
8
9
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
5 year average growth oya %
Trend line
Bihar
W.B.
Gujarat
H.P.A.P.
U.P.
M.P
Odisha
Chattisgarh
Karnataka
Maharashtra
Tamil Nadu
Punjab Delhi
Kerala
States better than trend
*GDP deflator of stateSource : CSO, CEIC
Presentation3
Inflation expectations likely adaptive
10
12
14
16
Inflation expectations % oya
Current perception
Year ahead expectation
10
12
14
16
Perceived inflation higher than expectations% oya
Current perception
38
2
4
6
8Se
p-0
6
Sep-0
7
Sep-0
8
Sep-0
9
Sep-1
0
Sep-1
1
Sep-1
2
Sep-1
3
Sep-1
4
perception
2
4
6
8
10
Sep-0
6
Sep-0
7
Sep-0
8
Sep-0
9
Sep-1
0
Sep-1
1
Sep-1
2
Sep-1
3
Sep-1
4
Measured inflation (CPI-IW)
Source : RBI, CEIC, Labour Bureau
Presentation3
Is 6% too ambitious?
9
10
11
12
%
CPI Headline
5
6
7
8
9
10
We've been there before
% oya
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
39
5
6
7
8
Aug-
12
Dec-
12
Apr-
13
Aug-
13
Dec-
13
Apr-
14
Aug-
14
RBI' s Jan 15 target
RBI' s Jan 16 target
0
1
2
3
4
5
Apr-01 Apr-02 Apr-03 Apr-04 Apr-05
Average CPI IW from 2001-2006 = 5.1%
Source: MOSPI
Presentation3
New CPI and CPI-IW move in tandem
1
2
2
3m/m, 3mma
Food Momentum: CPI IW vs All india CPI
Food (CPI- IW)
0.8
1.0
1.2
CPI- IW Core
m/m, sa 6MA m/m, sa 6MA
CPI Core vs CPI IW core
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
40
-1
-1
0
1
1
Mar-
12
May-1
2
Jul-
12
Sep-1
2
Nov-1
2
Jan-1
3
Mar-
13
May-1
3
Jul-
13
Sep-1
3
Nov-1
3
Jan-1
4
Mar-
14
May-1
4
Food (new CPI)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
Jul-
11
Oct
-11
Jan-1
2
Apr-
12
Jul-
12
Oct
-12
Jan-1
3
Apr-
13
Jul-
13
Oct
-13
Jan-1
4
Apr-
14
CPI core
Source : RBI, MOSPI
Presentation3
But real rates were positive !!
0
2
4
6
8
Real policy rates
%, deflated by CPI
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
41
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
01 03 05 07 09 11 13
Source : MOSPI, Bloomberg, CEIC
Presentation3
Food inflation elevated for almost a decade
12
14
16
18
India: Food inflation
%oya
15
20
25
% oya
India : Cereal and non-cereal inflation
cereal inflation
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
42
0
2
4
6
8
10
FY
03
FY
04
FY
05
FY
06
FY
07
FY
08
FY
09
FY
10
FY
11
FY
12
FY
13
FY
14
-5
0
5
10
FY01 FY03 FY05 FY07 FY09 FY11 FY13
non-cereal inflation
Source : MOSPI
Presentation3
Which is unsurprising given a structural mismatch
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12
CerealsIndex, 1990 = 100
Per-capita income
Per-capita output
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12
PulsesIndex, 1990 = 100
Per-capita income
Per-capita output
43
90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12
OilseedsIndex, 1990 = 100
Per-capita income
Per-capita output0
50
100
150
200
250
300
90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12
SugarcaneIndex, 1990 = 100
Per-capita income
Per-capita output
Source : NSSO, JPM Caculations
Presentation3A complex interplay of food, wages, core and expectations
Core
Inflation expectations(IE)
Input cost
44
Wages
(Slack, IE
Food
Inflation IE
Input cost
Presentation3
2014 monsoon makes a strong, late recovery
30
40
50
2014 monsoon season rainfall
Cumulative
% deficit(+)/surplus(-) of LPA
30
35
40
45
50
2009 monsoon season rainfall
Cumulative
Monthly
% deficit of LPA
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
45
-20
-10
0
10
20
June July August September
Monthly
0
5
10
15
20
25
June July August September
Monthly
Source : MET
Presentation3
Monsoon picks up, but is it too late?IN
DIA
: BO
UN
CIN
G T
O M
ALA
ISE
46
Source : MET
Presentation3
Key states to watch; it’s not just about cerealsIN
DIA
: BO
UN
CIN
G T
O M
ALA
ISE
47
Source : JPM Calculations
Presentation3Food prices soften in September, but the danger has not yet passed
1
3
4
High frequency food prices
m/m, nsa %
-6
-4
-2
0
% y-o-y growth
Kharif crop: first advance estimates
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
48
-5
-4
-2
-1
Mar
13
Jun 1
3
Sep 1
3
Dec 1
3
Mar
14
Jun 1
4
Sep 1
4
Source : DCA, Ministry of Agriculture
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
Total Rice Course Cereals
Pulses Oilseeds
Presentation3
The key will be how core reacts
0.4
0.6
0.8
ppts
Impact on core from a 100 bps food shock
13
15
17
19
% oya
Food
Core
Food spills into core
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
49
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
3
5
7
9
11A
pr-0
8
Oct-0
8
Apr-0
9
Oct-0
9
Apr-1
0
Oct-1
0
Apr-1
1
Oct-1
1
Source : MOSPI, JPM Calculations
Presentation3
Slack, margins and core
9.0
11.0
0.5
1.5
2.5
%
Output gap and growth
Output gap
16
18
Sensex EBIT margins (%)
Margins of corporate sector
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
50
1.0
3.0
5.0
7.0
-3.5
-2.5
-1.5
-0.5
04Q2 08Q2 12Q2
GDP growth 12
14
Q1
FY 1
0
Q1
FY 1
1
Q1
FY 1
2
Q1
FY 1
3
Q1
FY 1
4
Q1
FY 1
5
Source : Bloomberg, CEIC, JPM Calculations
Presentation3Government commences the daunting fight against food inflation
�MSPs increased only 2.1%
�Government announces plan to release 5 million tonnes of rice from buffer stocks
� Increase Minimum Export price for onions to Bill and potatoes
51
� “Advises” states to de-notify fruits and vegetables from APMC; Delhi to start
� Line of credit to states to import pulses and oilseeds
Presentation3
A continuation of fiscal orthodoxy
52
Presentation3
A welcome continuation of fiscal orthodoxy
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
% GDP
Need to net out asset sales
Adjusted for asset sales
-9
-8
-7
-6
3
5
% GDP
Federal deficit
% GDP
Reversing the Lehman stimulus finally
53
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15
Headline deficit
sales
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0-3
-1
1
1998/99 2002/03 2006/07 2010/11 2014/15
Cyclically-adjusted stimulus
Source : CSO, Ministry of Finance, Budget Documents, JPM Calculations
Presentation3Uncomfortable, not impossible, fiscal arithmetic
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
54
Source : CSO, Ministry of Finance, Budget Documents, JPM Calculations
Presentation3
A continuation of policy orthodoxy
� New government committed to reducing fiscal deficit to 4.1% of GDP from 4.5% of GDP
�Resisted the temptation of easing the fiscal stance and/or meeting target primarily through asset sales
� Would have resulted in fiscal easing (4.5% of GDP + 0.8% of GDP in asset sales = 0.% of GDP easing)
55
�Instead, net of asset sales, underlying fiscal stance tightened by 0.15% of GDP
�Finance Minister reiterated bringing down the deficit down to 3% of GDP in 2 years
�Importantly, supported the need for a “ formal, modern, monetary policy framework” (read: inflation targeting)
Presentation3
Some quibbles
�Very aggressive tax collection targets. Gross tax collections are pegged to grow at 19.7% this year compared to 10% last year. Tax buoyancy budgeted at 1.47 from 0.8 last year.
�If tax revenue at 15% , it would mean shortfall of 0.3% of GDP
56
0.3% of GDP
� Three options:
� Change the target later in the year
� Garner more asset sale revenue
� Cut expenditures (potentially capex)
Presentation3Recent rally presents excellent opportunity to offload
perseverance
350
400
450
India: PSU ETF
Index
PSU share up by 55% since Feb this
year
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
57
perseverance
150
200
250
300Jan-1
4
Jan-1
4
Feb-1
4
Mar-
14
Mar-
14
Apr-
14
May-1
4
May-1
4
Jun-1
4
Jul-
14
Jul-
14
Aug-
14
Source : Bloomberg
Presentation3But need fundamental tax and expenditure reforms
11
12
13
% GDP
Tax to GDP ratio never recovered post crisis
3.0
3.5
4.0
Source: GOI% GDP
India: government capex expenditure
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
58
8
9
10
11
FY92 FY97 FY02 FY07 FY12
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
FY98 FY00 FY02 FY04 FY06 FY08 FY10 FY12 FY14
Source : MoF, CSO
Presentation3
Nudges and pushes
Infra and Manufacturing
•Banks permitted to raise long-term funds for infrastructure sector without CRR/SLR
•Introduce an investment allowance at the rate of 15% to a manufacturing company that invests more than Rs250 million in new plant and machinery over the next three
59
million in new plant and machinery over the next three years.•A target of national highway construction of 8500 kilometers set for the current financial year with higher allocation of roads
Financial Savings
•Investment limit under Section 80C raised from Rs 1 lac to Rs 1.5 lac per person
Presentation3
Nudges and pushes
Capital flows
• FDI raised to 49% in defense and insurance
•Capital requirement for FDI for development of smart cities was eased
•Moving towards international settlement of Indian debt
60
•Moving towards international settlement of Indian debt securities
•Extending of 5% withholding tax to Indian corporatesbonds issued abroad to 2017
Presentation3
INR: what a difference a year makes
61
Presentation3
INR has stabilized in recent months
57
62
67
RBI announces slew of measures to arrest INR slide
USD/INR level
INR has depreciated by 40% in last 3 years
ECB comments of "will whatever it
takes" to save EuroChidambaram appointed as FM
New government
comes to power
62
42
47
52
57
Jan-1
1
Apr-
11
Jul-
11
Oct
-11
Jan-1
2
Apr-
12
Jul-
12
Oct
-12
Jan-1
3
Apr-
13
Jul-
13
Oct
-13
Jan-1
4
Apr-
14
European crisis
LTRO announced
European crisis spreds to core countries
Global EM sell off due to taper fears
Source : Bloomberg
Presentation3
And actually appreciated across a basket of currencies
57.5
58.0
58.5
59.0
59.5
67
68
69
LevelIndex
NEER
USD/INR
NEER and USD/INR
63
59.5
60.0
60.5
61.0
61.5
62.0
62.563
64
65
66
Jan-1
4
Feb-1
4
Mar-
14
Apr-
14
May-1
4
Jun-1
4
Ju
l-14
Aug-
14
Sep-1
4
USD/INR
Source : RBI, CEIC, Bloomberg , JPM Calculations
Presentation3
INR holds its own among EMs
-3
2
EM's currencies since 1Jan
% Appreciation(+/Depreciation (-)
Top five
0
2
Fragile five since 1Jan
% Appreciation(+)/Depreciation (-)
64
-23
-18
-13
-8
THB INR IDR MYR HKD PLN HUF CLP RUB ARS
Bottom five
-8
-6
-4
-2
INR IDR BRL TRY ZAR
Source : Bloomberg
Presentation3
A much sharper CAD adjustment in India
6
7
8
% of GDP
India has seen most dramatic CAD adjustment
2012
2013
2014(F)6
7
8
9
10
Turkey
% of GDP
But very different degree of current account adjustment
65
1
2
3
4
5
India Turkey South Africa
2014(F)
0
1
2
3
4
5
Q1-1
2
Q2-1
2
Q3-1
2
Q4-1
2
Q1-1
3
Q2-1
3
Q3-1
3
South Africa
India
Source : JPM Research
Presentation3
But most of it is regulatory
6
8
10
US$billion
Helped by gold imports plunge
66
0
2
4
Mar-12 Sep-12 Mar-13 Sep-13 Mar-14
Source : Ministry of Commerce
Presentation3
..and cyclical
6
7
8
9
10
10
15
20
25
Non-oil non-gold growth has declined tracking growth slowdown
oya% oya%
Non-oil non-gold imports
GDP growth(RHS)
12
14
16
18
30
40
50
Oya % Oya %
Capital goods imports fall in tandem with investments
Capital goods imports
67
0
1
2
3
4
5
-10
-5
0
5
10
FY
08-1
0
FY
11
FY
12
FY
13
FY
14
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
-20
-10
0
10
20
FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14
Investment
Source : CSO, CEIC JPM Calculations
Presentation3And commodities correction serves as a significant, positive terms of trade shock
102
104
March 14, prices re-based to 100
Global commodity prices
95
97
99
101
103
March 14, prices re-based to 100
Indian oil basket
IND
IA: B
OU
NC
ING
TO
MA
LAIS
E
68
96
98
100
Mar-
14
Apr-
14
May-1
4
Jun-1
4
Jul-
14
Aug-
14
Sep-1
4
85
87
89
91
93
95
Mar-
14
Apr-
14
May-1
4
Jun-1
4
Jul-
14
Aug-
14
Sep-1
4
Source : Bloomberg
Presentation3
CAD expected to remain depressed
India: CAD forecast
US$ billion
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15(F)
Current a/c balance -78 -88 -32 -27
% of GDP -4.2 -4.7 -1.7 -1.3
Merchandise trade balance -190 -196 -147.7 -139
% of GDP -10.1 -10.5 -7.9 -6.8
Ex ports 310 307 319 337
Imports 500 502 466 476
69
Imports 500 502 466 476
Oil imports* 155 169 168 161
Non-oil imports 345 333 299 315
Gold 62 54 29 31
Non-oil, non-gold 283 279 270 285
Net Inv isibles 112 107 115 112
o/w
serv ices 64 65 73 75
priv ate tranfers 63 64 63 65
inv estment income -16 -21 -23 -28
Source: RBI and JPM estimates
Source : RBI, JPM Calculations
Presentation3Impact of oil and commodity prices on macros
Every $10/barrel decline in oil prices:
Reduces CAD by 0.5% of GDP
Reduces Fiscal deficit by 0.2% of GDP
70
Reduces Fiscal deficit by 0.2% of GDP
Lowers WPI by 70 bps
Lowers Core CPI by 10 bps
Boosts growth by 20 bps
Source : JPM Calculations
Presentation3
Even as structural drags remain
30
40
Trade deficit of coal, iron ore, scrap metal and fertlizers has surgedUS$bn
5000
10000
15000
20000
Coal Imports
$ mn
71
0
10
20
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2010 2011 2012 2013
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
2010 2011 2012 2013
Iron Ore Exports
$ mn
Source : CSO, Ministry of Commerce, CEIC, JPM Calculations
Presentation3
But capital account …..
30
40
Estimated capital flow 2014 (YTD)
USD bn, YTD
Equity
72
0
10
20
FDI Portfolio Loans
Debt
Source : RBI, Bloomberg, CEIC, JPM Calculations
Presentation3
…and positioning remain a risk
61
62
63
Level
Interventions, bar height, 1 = $1 bn
RBI appears more permissive of a slow grind higher...
62
63
64
Actual USD/INR. Level
The carry has almost been wiped out in 2H
May 14 USD/INR levels adjusted for carry
Level
73
58
59
60
61
Jan-1
4
Feb-1
4
Mar-
14
Apr-
14
May-1
4
Jun-1
4
Jul-
14
Aug-1
4
Sep-1
4
USD/INR level
58
59
60
61
Jan-1
4
Mar-
14
May-
14
Jul-
14
Sep-1
4
Source : Bloomberg, RBI, JPM Calculations
Presentation3
INR staying close to fair value
125
CPI adjusted REER
Index
INR currently close to its fair value
74
95
105
115
04 06 08 10 12 14
Equilibrium REER
Source : RBI, CEIC, JPM Calculations
Presentation3
A constant ratcheting down
38
41
44
47
50
USD/INR, reverse scale
INR has ratcheted down following every bout of weakness
75
50
53
56
59
62
65
68
Apr 04 May 06 Jul 08 Aug 10 Sep 12 Oct 14
Average
Source : Bloomberg
Presentation3
High inflation generates a depreciating bias
100
110
120
130
140
REER
What explains this ...
150
170
Index, 1Q00=100
India's relative GDP 65% higher than in 2000
76
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2000
2002
2003
2004
2006
2007
2008
2010
2011
NEER
90
110
130
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010
Source : RBI, CSO, Bloomberg, CEIC, JPM Calculations
Presentation3Sustained appreciation needs sustained lower inflation
10
12
14
16
The INR's unpleasant arithmetic%-pts
Growth differential
Inflation differential
77
0
2
4
6
8
10
04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14
Source : CSO, JPM Calculations
Presentation3
Appendix
78
Appendix
Presentation3
Upside risk: exports should lift if global growth l ifts
6
Elasticity
India: except for BPO price elasticity of other exports is insignifcant
Demand elaticity
0
5
10
15
20
Change in manufacturing exports over the last decade%
79
-3
0
3
Texti
les
Leath
er
Gem
s
Ch
em
Eng
Soft
ware
BPO
Price elasticity
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
Leath
er
Ch
em
ical
Engg
goods
Texti
les
Gem
s &
Jew
el
Oth
ers
Source : Ministry of Coomerce, JPM Calculations
Presentation3
Analyst Certification:
The research analyst(s) denoted by an “AC” on the cover of this report certifies (or, where multiple research analysts are primarily responsible for this report, the research analyst denoted by an “AC” on the cover or within the document individually certifies, with respect to each security or issuer that the research analyst covers in this research) that: (1) all of the views expressed in this report accurately reflect his or her personal views about any and all of the subject securities or issuers; and (2) no part of any of the research analyst’s compensation was, is, or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations or views expressed by the research analyst(s) in this report.
Conflict of Interest: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------This research contains the views, opinions and reco mmendations of J.P. Morgan credit research analysts . In addition, research analysts receive compensation based, in part, on the quality and acc uracy of their analysis, client feedback, trading d esk and firm revenues and competitive factors. As a general matter, J.P. Morgan and/or its affilia tes normally make a market and trade as principal i n fixed income securities discussed in research reports.
Explanation of Credit Research Ratings: Ratings System: J.P. Morgan uses the following sector/issuer portfolio weightings: Overweight (over the next three months, the recommended risk position is expected to outperform the relevant index, sector, or benchmark), Neutral (over the next three months, the recommended risk position is expected to perform in line with the relevant index, sector, or benchmark), and Underweight (over the next three months, the recommended risk position is expected to underperform the relevant index, sector, or benchmark). J.P. Morgan’s Emerging Market research uses a rating of Marketweight, which is equivalent to a Neutral rating.
Valuation & Methodology: In J.P. Morgan’s credit research, we assign a rating to each issuer (Overweight, Underweight or Neutral) based on our credit view of the issuer and the relative value of its securities, taking into account the ratings assigned to the issuer by credit rating agencies and the market prices for the issuer’s securities. Our credit view of an issuer is based upon our opinion as to whether the issuer will be able service its debt obligations when they become due and payable. We assess this by analyzing, among other things, the issuer’s credit position using standard credit ratios such as cash flow to debt and fixed charge coverage (including and excluding capital investment). We also analyze the issuer’s ability to generate cash flow by reviewing standard operational measures for comparable companies in the sector, such as revenue and earnings growth rates, margins, and the composition of the issuer’s balance sheet relative to the operational leverage in its business.
Analysts’ Compensation: The research analysts responsible for the preparation of this report receive compensation based upon various factors, including the quality and accuracy of research, client feedback, competitive factors and overall firm revenues. The firm’s overall revenues include revenues from its investment banking and fixed income business units.
IND
IA:
CA
UG
HT
IN
AS
QU
AL
L
80
Presentation3
Other Disclosures--------------------------------------------------------------------------------J.P. Morgan is the global brand name for J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and its non-US affiliates worldwide.
Options related research: If the information contained herein regards options related research, such information is available only to persons who have received the proper option risk disclosure documents. For a copy of the Option Clearing Corporation’s Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options, please contact your J.P. Morgan Representative or visit the OCC’s website at http://www.optionsclearing.com/publications/risks/riskstoc.pdf.
Legal Entities Disclosures
English_Asia C&R Research
Legal Entities Disclosures U.S.: J.P. Morgan Securities LLC is a member of NYSE, FINRA and SIPC. J.P. Morgan Futures Inc. is a member of the NFA. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is a member of FDIC and is authorized and regulated in the UK by the Financial Services Authority. U.K.: J.P. Morgan Securities Ltd. (JPMSL) is a member of the London Stock Exchange and is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Registered in England & Wales No. 2711006. Registered Office 125 London Wall, London EC2Y 5AJ. South Africa: J.P. Morgan Equities Limited is a member of the Johannesburg Securities Exchange and is regulated by the FSB. Hong Kong: J.P. Morgan Securities (Asia Pacific) Limited (CE number AAJ321) is regulated by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority and the Securities and Futures Commission in Hong Kong. Korea: J.P. Morgan Securities (Far East) Ltd, Seoul branch, is regulated by the Korea Financial Supervisory Service. Australia: J.P. Morgan Australia Limited (ABN 52 002 888 011/AFS Licence No: 238188) is regulated by ASIC and J.P. Morgan Securities Australia Limited (ABN 61 003 245 234/AFS Licence No: 238066) is a Market Participant with the ASX and regulated by ASIC. Taiwan: J.P.Morgan Securities (Taiwan) Limited is a participant of the Taiwan Stock Exchange (company-type) and regulated by the Taiwan Securities and Futures Bureau. India: J.P. Morgan India Private Limited is a member of the National Stock Exchange of India Limited and Bombay Stock Exchange Limited and is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India. Thailand: JPMorgan Securities (Thailand) Limited is a member of the Stock Exchange of Thailand and is regulated by the Ministry of Finance and the Securities and Exchange Commission. Indonesia: PT J.P. Morgan Securities Indonesia is a member of the Indonesia Stock Exchange and is regulated by the BAPEPAM. Philippines: J.P. Morgan Securities Philippines Inc. is a member of the Philippine Stock Exchange and is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Brazil: Banco J.P. Morgan S.A. is regulated by the Comissao de Valores Mobiliarios (CVM) and by the Central Bank of Brazil. Mexico:J.P. Morgan Casa de Bolsa, S.A. de C.V., J.P. Morgan Grupo Financiero is a member of the Mexican Stock Exchange and authorized to act as a broker dealer by the National Banking and Securities Exchange Commission. Singapore: This material is issued and distributed in Singapore by J.P. Morgan Securities Singapore Private Limited (JPMSS) [mica (p) 207/01/2008 and Co. Reg. No.: 199405335R] which is a member of the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited and is regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and/or JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Singapore branch (JPMCB Singapore) which is regulated by the MAS. Malaysia: This material is issued and distributed in Malaysia by JPMorgan Securities (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (18146-X) which is a Participating Organization of Bursa Malaysia Berhad and a holder of Capital Markets Services License issued by the Securities Commission in Malaysia. Pakistan: J. P. Morgan Pakistan Broking (Pvt.) Ltd is a member of the Karachi Stock Exchange and regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan.
IND
IA:
CA
UG
HT
IN
AS
QU
AL
L
81
Presentation3
Country and Region Specific DisclosuresU.K. and European Economic Area (EEA): Unless specified to the contrary, issued and approved for distribution in the U.K. and the EEA by JPMSL. Investment research issued by JPMSL has been prepared in accordance with JPMSL's policies for managing conflicts of interest arising as a result of publication and distribution of investment research. Many European regulators require that a firm to establish, implement and maintain such a policy. This report has been issued in the U.K. only to persons of a kind described in Article 19 (5), 38, 47 and 49 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (all such persons being referred to as "relevant persons"). This document must not be acted on or relied on by persons who are not relevant persons. Any investment or investment activity to which this document relates is only available to relevant persons and will be engaged in only with relevant persons. In other EEA countries, the report has been issued to persons regarded as professional investors (or equivalent) in their home jurisdiction. Australia: This material is issued and distributed by JPMSAL in Australia to “wholesale clients” only. JPMSAL does not issue or distribute this material to “retail clients.” The recipient of this material must not distribute it to any third party or outside Australia without the prior written consent of JPMSAL. For the purposes of this paragraph the terms “wholesale client” and “retail client” have the meanings given to them in section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. Germany: This material is distributed in Germany by J.P. Morgan Securities Ltd., Frankfurt Branch and J.P.Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Frankfurt Branch which are regulated by the Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht. Hong Kong: The 1% ownership disclosure as of the previous month end satisfies the requirements under Paragraph 16.5(a) of the Hong Kong Code of Conduct for persons licensed by or registered with the Securities and Futures Commission. (For research published within the first ten days of the month, the disclosure may be based on the month end data from two months’ prior.) J.P. Morgan Broking (Hong Kong) Limited is the liquidity provider for derivative warrants issued by J.P. Morgan International Derivatives Ltd and listed on The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited. An updated list can be found on HKEx website: http://www.hkex.com.hk/prod/dw/Lp.htm. Japan: There is a risk that a loss may occur due to a change in the price of the shares in the case of share trading, and that a loss may occur due to the exchange rate in the case of foreign share trading. In the case of share trading, JPMorgan Securities Japan Co., Ltd., will be receiving a brokerage fee and consumption tax (shouhizei) calculated by multiplying the executed price by the commission rate which was individually agreed between JPMorgan Securities Japan Co., Ltd., and the customer in advance. Financial Instruments Firms: JPMorgan Securities Japan Co., Ltd., Kanto Local Finance Bureau (kinsho) No. 82 Participating Association / Japan Securities Dealers Association, The Financial Futures Association of Japan. Korea: This report may have been edited or contributed to from time to time by affiliates of J.P. Morgan Securities (Far East) Ltd, Seoul branch. Singapore: JPMSS and/or its affiliates may have a holding in any of the securities discussed in this report; for
English_Asia C&R Research
Morgan Securities (Far East) Ltd, Seoul branch. Singapore: JPMSS and/or its affiliates may have a holding in any of the securities discussed in this report; for securities where the holding is 1% or greater, the specific holding is disclosed in the Important Disclosures section above. India: For private circulation only, not for sale. Pakistan: For private circulation only, not for sale. New Zealand: This material is issued and distributed by JPMSAL in New Zealand only to persons whose principal business is the investment of money or who, in the course of and for the purposes of their business, habitually invest money. JPMSAL does not issue or distribute this material to members of "the public" as determined in accordance with section 3 of the Securities Act 1978. The recipient of this material must not distribute it to any third party or outside New Zealand without the prior written consent of JPMSAL.
General: Additional information is available upon request. Information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but JPMorgan Chase & Co. or its affiliates and/or subsidiaries (collectively J.P. Morgan) do not warrant its completeness or accuracy except with respect to any disclosures relative to J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and/or its affiliates and the analyst’s involvement with the issuer that is the subject of the research. All pricing is as of the close of market for the securities discussed, unless otherwise stated. Opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. The opinions and recommendations herein do not take into account individual client circumstances, objectives, or needs and are not intended as recommendations of particular securities, financial instruments or strategies to particular clients. The recipient of this report must make its own independent decisions regarding any securities or financial instruments mentioned herein. J.P. Morgan Securities LLC distributes in the U.S. research published by non-U.S. affiliates and accepts responsibility for its contents. Periodic updates may be provided on companies/industries based on company specific developments or announcements, market conditions or any other publicly available information. Clients should contact analysts and execute transactions through a J.P. Morgan subsidiary or affiliate in their home jurisdiction unless governing law permits otherwise.
“Other Disclosures” last revised January 2, 2009.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Copyright 2009 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights rese rved. This report or any portion hereof may not be reprinted, sold or redistributed without the written consent of J.P. Morgan.
IND
IA:
CA
UG
HT
IN
AS
QU
AL
L
82