India- An Evil Paradise

7/31/2019 India- An Evil Paradise

1/18

India- An Evil Paradise

Afzal Saved; Indians Shamed.

So is this the Moment of the truth?

What I am expected to do? Feel proud and celebrate the secularism? OR shall hang my

head in the shame?

What message is being conveyed to the brave soldiers? Is it that you will be sacrificed at thealtar of secularism and the political expediency?

What is important INDIA or fist full of votes in UP elections?

How will the parents encourage their children to join the Armed forces? If this is how we treatthe memories of those who laid their lives to protect POLITICAL CLASS, the question,

which comes to any bodys mind, is

DID THEY DO RIGHT THING?

How I wish that Mr. CLEAN and Dr. Good or the Balidaan Devi answered to the nation.

I refuse to believe that neither of them have any time to answer to such a COMMUNALIST,as your truly.

This nation is mine too and like any other Indian who takes pride in being INDIAN, I have theright to demand these answers.

OR is it I am asking right questions but from wrong people?

Very Hurt and Shameful,Are you a

Secularist?

Then please answer these questions for yourself

There are nearly 52 Muslim countries.Show one Muslim country where Hindus are extended the special rights that Muslims are accorded in India?

Show one country where the 85% majority craves for the indulgence of the 15% minority.

Show one Muslim country, which has a Non-Muslim as its President or Prime Minister.

Show one Mullah or Maulvi who has declared a 'fatwa' against terrorists.

Hindu-majority Maharashtra, Bihar, Kerala, Pondicherry , etc. have in the past elected Muslims as CMs,

Can you ever imagine a Hindu becoming the CM of Muslim - majority J&K?

Today Hindus are 85%. If Hindus are intolerant, how come Masjids and madrasas are thriving? How comeMuslims are offering Namaz on the road? How come Muslims are proclaiming 5 times a day on loud

speakers that there is no God except Allah?

When Hindus gave to Muslims 30% of Bharat for a song, why should

Hindus now beg for their sacred places at Ayodhya, Mathura And Kashi?Why Temple funds are spent for the welfare of Muslims and Christians, when they are free to spend their

money in any way they like?When uniform is made compulsory for school children, why there is no Uniform Civil Code for citizens?

In what way, J&K is different from Maharashtra, TamilNadu or UttarPradesh, to have Article 370?

Why Gandhiji objected to the decision of the cabinet and insisted that Somnath Temple should be

reconstructed out of public fund, not government funds, when in January 1948 he pressurized Nehru and

Patel to carry on renovation of the Mosques of Delhi at government expenses?

Why Gandhi supported Khaliafat Movement (nothing to do with our freedom movement) and what in turn he

got?

If Muslims & Christians are minorities in Maharashtra, UP, Bihar etc., are Hindus not minorities in J&K,

Mizoram, Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya etc? Why are Hindus denied minority rights in these

states?Do you admit that Hindus do have problems that need to be recognized? Or do you think that those who

call themselves Hindus are themselves The problem?

Why post - Godhra is blown out of proportion, when no-one talks of the

ethnic cleansing of 4 lakh Hindus from Kashmir?

In 1947, when India was partitioned, the Hindu population in Pakistan was about 24%. Today it is not even

1%. In 1947, the Hindu population in East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) was 30%. Today it is about 7%. What

happened to the missing Hindus? Do Hindus have human rights?In contrast, in India, Muslim population has gone up from 10.4% in 1951 to about 14% today; whereas

Hindu population has come down from 87.2% in 1951 to 85% in 1991. Do you still think that Hindus are

fundamentalists?

Do you consider that - Sanskrit is communal and Urdu is secular, Mandir is Communal and Masjid isSecular, Sadhu is Communal and Imam is secular, BJP is communal and Muslim League is Secular,


2/18

Dr.Praveen Bhai Togadia ,Gujrat Chief Minister Narendra Modi and, Acharya Arya Nareshand Ashok

Shingal are ANTI-NATIONAL and Bukhari is Secular, Vande Mataram is communal and Allah-O-Akbar is

secular, Shriman is communal and Mian is secular, Hinduism is Communal and Islam is Secular, Hindutva is

communal and Jihadism is secular, and at last, Bharat is communal and Italy is Secular?

When Christian and Muslim schools can teach Bible and Quran, Why Hindus cannot teach Gita or

Ramayan ?

Abdul Rehman Antuley was made a trustee of the famous Siddhi Vinayak

Temple in Prabhadevi, Mumbai. Can a Hindu - say Mulayam or Laloo ever become a trustee of a Masjid

or Madarsa?

Dr. Praveen Bhai Togadia has been arrested many times on flimsy grounds. Has the Shahi Imam of JamaMasjid, Delhi, Ahmed Bukhari been arrested For claiming to be an ISI agent and advocating partition of

Bharat?

When Haj pilgrims are given subsidy, Why Hindu pilgrims to Amarnath,Sabarimalai & Kailash Mansarovar are taxed? A Muslim President, a Hindu Prime Ministerand a Christian Defence Minister run the affairs of the nation with a unity of purpose.

Can this happen anywhere, except in a HINDU NATION - BHARAT?

Do You Know The Reason For Such Slave Mentality

To the faith of the believer of Islam , therefore, has been added a compulsion -- to

prove itself again.

"Death is just an insignificant word for them," begins the report in The News of 28 November, 1997 on theannual gathering of the Mujahidin-e-Taiba. "Killing those who do not share their set of Islamic values is the onlyreality. The congregation was flooded with thousands of people with these beliefs..." "And the massive gatheringof people delivered one message loud and clear," the paper reports, "there is no dearth of manpower in Pakistanfor the fanatic forces to indoctrinate. 'If I die fighting, I will be greeted in heaven by Allah who will smile uponme,' said a 20-year old mujahid from Okra." The paper reproduces at length the views and exhortations of"Professor" Saeed who heads the organization which is conducting the congregation, the Jamaat Dawa-wal-Ishad. He conveys a simple message, it says :

"It was God who had ordered the establishment of the law of Islam everywhere in the world." He calls for a

jehad, says the paper, for ending the democratic system in Pakistan and turning it into "a pure Islamic Stategoverned by strict Shariat laws." At the congregation he rejects democracy, proclaiming, "the notion of thesovereignty of the people is un-Islamic -- only Allah is sovereign." [That has been the provision in each ofPakistan's three Constitutions since the Objectives Resolution was passed in 1949.] And these notions have beenwell internalized by the congregation, the paper reports : "The whole place was full of signboards with sloganslike 'Jamhooriat ka jawab, grenade and blast." (Our reply to democracy, grenade and blast). "The Dawa chiefsaid his organization's main interest in Pakistan waas to pick people and train them to wage jehad in countrieswherever an un-Islamic government was in power," the paper says.

"God has ordained every Muslim to fight until his rule is established," he declared. "We have no option but tofollow God's order." stoke terrorism, sending army regulars, spreading fabrications at every internationalgathering -- it pictures to itself as jihad, as a religious undertaking, indeed as an Allah-ordained duty.Concocting lies then becomes a device for discharging that duty. "War is stratagem," the Prophet has said, "Waris deceit." [Sahih Muslim, Volume III, pp. 945, 990-91; Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume IV, pp. 166-67; Sunan Abu

Dawud, Volume II, p. 728] Thus one may lie, one may kill the enemy while he is asleep, one may kill him bytricking him. [For instance, Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume IV, pp. 164-65, 167-68.]

That is one problem: for the man or force weaned on jihad, the concoctions are an intrinsic part of the strugglehe is waging, for him the fact that the war he is waging is Allah-ordained is a complete justification for cruelty,for lies and the rest; on our side, we don't just shut our eyes to the concoctions that result from it, we shut oureyes even more tightly to the Ideology of which they are but the result.

Belief makes one not just blind, it makes one reckless. A teenage Muslim girl was killed by her parents last nightand her body chopped into pieces because she dared to elope and marry the man she loved.Mohsina Akhtar's murder came to light when Muzaffarnagar police stopped three persons carrying a huge gunnybag. Inside were pieces of the 18-year-old's body and a chopper and an axe used in the "honour killing".Superintendent of police (rural) Lucknow , sri Arvind Pandey said the three Mohsina's mother Iqbal Jehan,maternal uncle Kallu Mohsin and brother Mohsin - confessed they were on their way to dump the pieces in acanal near Lalauna, the west Uttar Pradesh village where Mohsina was murdered.

Pandey said Iqbal told him it was the body of a "shaitan" (devil). "Yeh shaitan meri beti thi. Humne unko maardala (This devil was my daughter. We have killed her).""All three admitted that they killed Mohsina because she loved a Muslim boy from a neighbouring village andmarried him after eloping a month back," the officer said. "I have handled many such incidents of honour killingbut this was one of the most gruesome."Police sources said the girl's father, Mohammad Akhtar, who hasn't been arrested, will be questioned tomorrow.Senior superintendent of police Sushil Kumar said Iqbal, who has another daughter, didn't betray any remorse.

"When they were produced in court today, she was silent, as were Kallu and Mohsin. Iqbal said she had to killher. She said she was not feeling good after the murder but has no regrets," the SSP added.Residents said one reason for the lack of regret is the increasing social recognition such honour killings -common in the northwest frontier region of Pakistan - are getting in western Uttar Pradesh."Villagers often pool money to bear the legal expenses of a family that kills a wayward daughter," said a residentof adjoining Baghpat."An elopement makes it difficult for a family to get a match for other daughters," said Rajiv Soni, a social

worker.According to police files, 23 cases of honour killings have been reported in the Baghpat-Muzaffarnagar-Saharanpur-Bijnor region since 2006, including six this year in Muslim families. Yesterday, a woman who hadbeen forced into marriage was shot dead by her brother for refusing to go to her marital home."I suspect hardcore fundamentalist elements are encouraging these incidents," said Shaista Amber, a member of


3/18

the All India Muslim Women's Personal Law Board.Mohsina had fallen in love with Mukhtar Mahmud, 20, a resident of Bilaspur, a village about 2km from her home.

The family had recently shifted to Lalauna, where Mohsina's maternal uncles live, and found that neighboursknew about the affair. Her uncle Kallu told the police that the family tried to stop her as society frowns uponsuch relationships.But Mohsina and Mukhtar eloped and got married last month. Soon, the whispers "inki ladki bhaag gai hai" - gotlouder. The family's instant reaction was fear of social ostracism. Iqbal had to marry off another daughter. SoMohsina had to be killed.Unconfirmed reports said a small group of elderly residents also ruled that Mohsina should be killed to protectthe family's honour.

The young couple made the mistake of returning home last week. Last night, Mohsina was hanged from a ceilingfan of a room in her maternal uncles' house. Her body was then taken to a cattle shed where it was cut intopieces.The lesson he internalises is that Allah shall always come to the aid of believers, that the side of Allah shallprevail. So all one has to do is leap. The belief having been drilled into him that he is doing Allah's Will -- or, asin Marxism-Leninism, of History -- the believer just cannot believe that the fault may lie with him. As the war heis waging has been ordained by Allah, the one who is opposing him must, by definition, be doing so for someperverse reason, for some ulterior purpose.

These Criminals of generating terrorisms in India are considered to be the national hero by the public at

large. Such Criminals are not punished, but reformed here. If after imprisonment of such accused person,

one may dare to ask for the reason of committing genocides of Hindus, they will reply with bit hesitationthat their religion justify such killing under the domain of Jihad for converting Darul-e herb in to Darul-e

Islam. To whom you are applying the theory of Reformative Punishment. Seldom I think that strikingterror amongst peace loving citizens is theory of fear psychosis. This is the fear of the Rule of Law, whichmay keep citizen survive under the domination of Sovereignty. The moment, there is no fear in mind of

the criminals; there is no law in this country.

capitalism is certain to collapse, it is on the verge of collapsing, Allah is bound to come to the assistance ofbelievers, His cause is bound to prevail... "old tricks to garner votes".

Corruption has become the way of life. Scrupulous regards to the truthfulness have become

disqualification in Public Life. One has to live with diplomacy , deceptiveness and to talk with restraintsotherwise simplicity will become disqualification.

"A short-sighted and pathetically parochial politician whose instincts for political survival are both reactionary

and jingoistic. His passion for the cheap thrill coupled with the BJP's desire to regain a foothold in contemporaryIndian politics have resulted in airstrikes on Kashmiri freedom fighters..."

When the believer succeeds, he is confirmed in the belief that the Ideology has driven into him -- that

Allah is with him. But the Ideology has also driven another notion into him -- a notion that protects the

Ideology from an adverse outcome, but by the same token disables the believer from learning. When they

are defeated, the faithful have been taught to conclude, Allah is just testing their faith: Allah has put defeatin their path, they have been taught, to ascertain whether at such a time they lose faith in Allah's promise.

Do they abandon their faith in Allah?, Allah wants to see. Do they blame Him rather than themselves?,

Allah wants to make sure.

The mob violence and mass psychology is predominated factor to be taken as determining factor in

democratic set up of our secularist, Parliamentarian Democracy. It is rightly said that Society consists offools as these people play the preconceived role in matter of governance of Society. The caste factors and

appeasements to invader on privacy of an innocent citizen has become the stringent factors for ruin of

electoral process. There is hardly any respect to harmonically preserved solidarity towards nationalintegration.

The functioning of the Honble Courts are seldom dependent upon the goodwill andconsciences of people. The public opinion and concealed sympathy may be perceived for a convict, even he hadcommitted robbery , kidnapping, arson genocides, terrorism upon defenseless citizens. Hippo racy ,pschopherancy is duly protected and favoritism, nepotism and coercion by the person having hold upon poweris seldom dealt with criticism. "What is the VHP? Whom does it represent? What is its locus standi?", theSupreme Court asked the other day -- and it seemed to have done so in a tone that triggered much delightamong secularists.

A strange question, the PM remarked in the Rajya Sabha. A member was up and shouting, actually severalsecular ones were, interrupting the Prime Minister. Who are the VHP?... They dont represent the Hindus... Theywill put a bullet through me..., so what?... The members seemed quite beside themselves. If the mere mentionof its name causes so much reaction, the PM observed, then it certainly has locus standi.

In matters of religion and faith, standing is not acquired by winning elections, he said. It depends on the esteemin which people come to hold one...

A telling answer in itself. And it left the critics non-plussed.

Another side to the question that had fallen from the Bench too would have struck you. The Bench did not ask,as the Constitution Bench had not asked, Who is Mohammed Aslam, alias Bhure? Whom does he represent?What is his locus standi? It did not ask, What is the Babri Masjid Action Committee? Whom does it represent?What is its locus standi? It did not ask, What is the All India Muslim Law Board? Whom does it represent?What is its locus standi? How is it that doubt assailed it only in regard to the Vishwa Hindu Parishad?

To put the matter at the least, the Bench could have looked up the Supreme Courts own judgement in theAyodhya case itself! The movement to construct a Ram temple at the site of the disputed structure gatheredmomentum in recent years which became a matter of great controversy and a source of tension, thejudgement quoted the (Narasimha Rao) Governments White Paper as saying. This led to several parleys thedetails of which are not very material for the present purpose. These parleys involving the Vishwa Hindu


4/18

Parishad (VHP) and the All India Babri Masjid Action Committee (AIBMAC), however failed to resolve thedispute... Again, At the centre of the Ram Janma Bhumi - Babari Masjid dispute is the demand voiced by the

Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) and its allied organisations for the restoration of a site said to be the birthplace ofSri Ram in Ayodhya...

Yet again, The VHP and its allied organisations base their demand on the assertion that... And yet again, Thedemand of the VHP has found support from the Bhartiya Janata Party... And yet again, It was also stated bycertain Muslim leaders that if these assertions were proved, the Muslims would voluntarily hand over thedisputed shrine to the Hindus. Naturally, this became the central issue in the negotiations between the VHP and

the AIBMAC.

But suddenly, What is the VHP? Who does it represent? What is its locus standi?In any event, that allusion to parleys holds a lesson we will do well to remember. One of the best things MrChandrashekhar did during his brief Prime Ministership was to get the two sides to agree that the only way tomake progress was to exchange evidence on the matter. The two sides started meeting and exchangingdocuments and written arguments. The Babri Masjid Action Committee was guided by a clutch of Marxisthistorians -- actually, guided by is not quite right: it seemed just the front for these eminent historians. Thelatter used the offices and facilities of the ICHR that they then controlled to prepare the AIBMAC submissions --a fact that led the then Member Secretary to resign from his post.

The evidence that the Babri Masjid group submitted was no evidence at all. It was just a miscellaneous pile --much of it puerile: that Rama was a King of Egypt, that he was born in Afghanistan, and the rest!

The VHP marshalled an array of evidence from archaeological sources, from historical records, from literarysources. That was the end of the parleys! Realising that they could produce nothing to match what the VHPhad submitted, the Marxist historians and the AIBMAC gentry just stopped attending the meetings. And it was

this withdrawal, and the consequential death of the talks that Mr Chandrashekhar had initiated, as much asanything else that triggered the chain of events that led ultimately to the destruction of the mosque.

I did not doubt for a moment that the new efforts of the Shankaracharya of Kanchi would meet exactly the samefate. And for good reason. In one of the letters that he included in his 'A Bunch of Old Letters', Pandit Nehruused a phrase about Jinnah that describes this bunch, and its invariable device to the dot: Mr Jinnahspermanently negative answer, Panditji wrote. This is the singular negotiating tactic of such individuals: just goon rejecting every formula that the other fellow brings up.

And the tragedy is -- the self-inflicted tragedy is -- that there always are persons, groups, powers that insistthat the onus of producing the next formula, some formula which will incorporate an even greater concession tothe other fellow is on us. And in the end we give in to this insistence. The power and groups that keep insistingthat we go on producing new formulae: the British on the question of partition, the host of interlocutors onKashmir, the secularists on the Ram Janmabhumi.

And the ones who merely keep deploying the permanently negative answer: Jinnah kept rejecting everyformula on partition; Pakistan keeps rejecting every formula on Kashmir; the Babri Masjid votaries keep,

and will keep rejecting every formula on the Janmabhumi.

"Hindustan ki Masjidein"

The devout constructed so many mosques, Maulana Abdul Hai records, they lavished such huge amounts andsuch labors on them that they cannot be all reckoned, that every city, town, hamlet came to be adorned by amosque. He says that he will therefore have to be content with setting out the facts of just a few of the well-known ones.

Qawwat al-Islam Mosque at Delhi

"According to my findings the first mosque of Delhi is Qubbat al-Islam or Quwwat al-Islam which, it is said,Qutub-Din Aibak constructed in H. 587 after demolishing the temple built by Prithvi Raj and leaving certain partsof the temple; and when he returned from Ghazni in H. 592, he started building, under orders from ShihabuddinGhori, a huge mosque of inimitable red stones, and certain parts of the temple were included in the mosque.After that, when Shamsud-Din Altamish became the king, he built, on both sides of it, edifices of white stones,and on one side of it he started constructing the loftiest of all towers which has no equal in the world for itsbeauty and strength."

The Mosque at Jaunpur

"This was built by Sultan Ibrahim Sharqi with chiseled stones. Originally, it was a Hindu temple afterdemolishing which he constructed the mosque. It is known as the Atala Masjid. The Sultan used to offer hisFriday and Id prayers in it, and Qazi Shihbud-Din gave lessons in it"

The Mosque at Kanauj

"This mosque stands on an elevated ground inside the Fort of Kanauj. It is well-known that it was built on thefoundations of some Hindu temple (that stood) here. It is a beautiful mosque. They say that it was built byIbrahim Sharqi in H. 809 as is recorded in Gharbat Nigar. "

The Jami Mosque at Etawah

"This mosque stands on the bank of the Jamuna at Etawah. There was a Hindu temple at this place, on the site

of which this mosque was constructed. It is also patterned after the mosque at Kanauj. Probably it is one of themonuments of the Sharqi Sultans."

Babri Masjid at Ayodhya

"This mosque was constructed by Babar at Ayodhya which Hindus call the birth place of Ramchandraji. There isa famous story about his wife Sita. It is said Sita had a temple here in which she lived and cooked food for herhusband. On that very site Babar constructed this mosque in H. 963 "

Mosques of Aalamgir Aurangzeb

"It is said that the mosque of Benares was built by Alamgir on the site of Vishweshwar Temple. That temple wasvery tall and held as holy among the Hindus. On this very site and with those very stones he constructed a loftymosque, and its ancient stones were rearranged after being embedded in the walls of the mosque. It is one ofthe renowned mosques of Hindustan. The second mosque at Beneras is the one which was built by Alamgir onthe bank of Ganga with chiseled stones. This also is a renowned mosque of Hindustan. It has 28 towers, each of


5/18

which is 238 feet tall. This is on the bank of the Ganga and its foundations extend to the depth of the waters.Alamgir built mosque at Mathura. It is said that this mosque was built on the site of the Gobind Dev Temple

which was very strong and beautiful as well as exquisite"

IN THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD.

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 36818 of 2004

(Under Article 226 of constitution of India)

(District Agra)

1. Institute of Rewriting Indian History Through its Founder President, P. N. Oak S/O Late Shri

Nagesh Krishna Oak, R/O - Plot No. 10, Goodwill Society,Aundh, Pune 411007

2. P. N. Oak. S/O Late Shri Nagesh Krishna Oak, R/O - Plot No. 10, Goodwill

Society, Aundh, Pune - 4110071. Founder President, Institute of Rewriting

Indian History, Aundh, Pune - 4110071 ------------------------Petitioner

VERSUS

1. Union of India through Secretary,Human Resources and Development (HRD),

Government of India, New Delhi.

2.Secretary, Tourism and Archeological Department, Govt. of India,

New Delhi

3.Director General,

Archaeological Survey of India,

Government of India, Janapath, New Delhi.----------Respondents.

--------------------- The following prayers are made in the present Writ Petition:- Issue a Writ, order, direction in the nature of mandamus by appointing a facts finding

committee for exposing the falsehood of the Arceaological department regarding thehistorical blunder committed by them in respect of their purported claim set-up in declaringTaj-Mahal, Red- fort Agra, Fatahpur Sikiri and other ancient Hindu buildings/ monumentsas Mughal monuments and restrain them from displaying the authorship of these buildingsas constructed by Sahajahan or by any Mughal Invaders as truth may be disclosed to the

public/citizens and Students in Subject of History regarding their true authorship prior toMughal period in furtherance of their fundamental rights conferred to the Citizens under

Article 19 (1) (a), 25 and 26 read with49 and 51-A(f) (h) of Constitution of India and

Freedom Of Information Act, 2002. Issue a writ, order, direction in the nature of mandamus declaring the provisions of TheAncient And Historical Monuments And Archaeological Sites And Remains (Declaration OfNational Importance) Act, 1951 to the extend of declaring the ancient and historicalmonuments and other and Archaeological Sites namely Taj Mahal. Fatehpur-sikiri, AgraRed Ford, Ethmadualla and other Monuments as built by Mugal invaders on the basis ofreport submitted by Then Governor General, Lord Auckland, and young lieutenant

Alexander Cunningham conceived indigenous scheme of Divide and Rule and therebymisusing the archaeological studies, as ultravires to Article 19 (1) (a), 25,26 49 And 51-A(f) (h) constitution of India and this Honble Court may further declare the provision of

Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains (Declaration ofNational Importance) Act, 1951 (71 of 1951), The Ancient Monuments And ArchaeologicalSites And Remains Act, 1958 of declaring these ancient building/ monuments preservedwith such false identity with out any scientific inquiry/ investigation as purported Mughalmonuments / graveyards as unconstitutional and void.

Issue a writ, order, direction in the nature of mandamus on the basis of the ResearchConducted by the petitioner No.-2 as published in the different books written by him asreferred in earlier paragraphs namely 1. World Vedic Heritage, 2. The Tajmahal is aTemple Place, 3.Some Blunders of Indian Historical Research, 4. Flowers Howlers, 5.Learning Vedic Astrology, 6. Some Missing Chapters of World History, 7. Agra red Fort is aHindu Building, 8.Great Britain was Hindu Land, 9. The Taj Mahal is Tejomahalaya a ShivaTemple, 10.Who Says Akbar was Great, 11. Vedic Guide to Health, Beauty, Longevity andRejuvenation, 12. Islamic Havoc in Indian History Published by-HINDI SAHITYA SADAN 2,B. D. Chambers, 10/54 D. B. Gupta Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005, the truth maybe exposed through Scientific inventions and temperaments to the Citizen/ Students ofhistory by conducting the research/ excavations of the remains of Hindu monuments by theCentral Government surroundings to all such Hindu Palace/ temple and other ancient


6/18

archaeological building/ Monuments as the incidents like demolition of disputed structure atAyodhya may not be repeated resulting in mass destruction of the public property shackingof public confidence under Rule Of Law in the society.

Issue a writ, order, directions in the nature of mandamus directing the respondentauthorities after due Scientific investigation and facts finding inquiry report, the respondentsin particular the Archaeological Survey of India may Declare and Notify in terms of the truehistory, as the Taj Mahal was not built by Shahajahan and thereby directing the

Archaeological Survey of India to remove the notices displayed by them in the Taj Mahal

premises crediting Shahjahan as its creator and to further desist from writing / publishing /proclaiming / propagating and teaching about Shahjahan being the author of Taj Mahal andstop and discontinue the free entry in Taj Mahal premises on Fridays in the week.

Issue a writ, order, direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondentauthorities in particular Archaeological Survey of India 1)-to open the locks of upper andlower portions of the 4 storeyed building of Taj Mahal having numbers of rooms, 2)-toremove all bricked up walls build later blocking such rooms therein, 3)-to investigatescientifically and certify that which of those or both cenotaphs are fake,4)-to look for a subterrace storey below the river bank ground level, 5)-to look into after removing the room-entrance directly beneath the basement cenotaph-chamber.6)- by removing the brick andlime barricade flocking the doorway, 7)-to look for important historical evidence such as

idols and inscriptions hidden inside there by the Shahjahans orders as truth may not makeus rich but the same will make us free from superstitions and false propaganda of some offundamentalists.

That the controversy involved in the present writ petition filed on behalf of the petitioners institution,

namely, Institute for Re-writing Indian (and World) History. It is submitted that on account of hiding the ground floor from the exposure to the public of all these

monuments, there has been the complete neglect resulting in demolition of the of the existing

structures of all the three monuments. It has come to notice of the general public through differentmedia reports, that Taj Mahal and other monuments are dying and there has been the tilting of the

minarets and its foundation may be sinking. The petitioner is further placing the photographs having

the description written by Archeological Survey of India on the marble stone planted outside the Tajbuilding, which has the vital contradictions, in itself indicating the construction of Taj Mahal built

during reign of emperor Shah Jahan from 1628 to 1656 AD, while Anjuman Bano the niece of

emperor Noor Jahan and the daughter of Mirza Gihas Beg admittedly died on 17 th June 1631, The true

copy of the Photographs and writing displayed on the marble plank out side the Taj building that thedoors affixed towards Yamuna side were found for being carved out from the wooden material, which

were found to be aged about more than 800 years at Brookline University, through carbon dating test-

14 conducted in America and as such these doors have been mysteriously disappeared by the interestedparties under the garb of maintenance of building under the provision of Wakf Act,1995. There are

more than ten chambers of the ground floor, which have been sealed while twenty two chambers were

hidden inside the red stone building, for which, there is description in Moinnudeen Book The Taj and

its Environments.

Sri P.N. Oak was born on 2nd March 1917 at Indore and he fought the battle of

independence in association with Neta Ji Sri Subhash Chandra Bose and thereafter conducted the researchon the ancient Vedic Cultural Heritage in India and also in different part of the World. He is now running

at the age of above 87 years.

I am unjust, but I can strive for justice,My lifes unkind, but I can vote for kindness.

I, the un-loving, say life should be lovely,

I, that am blind, cry against my blindness.

That the dawn of independence has virtually came with confrontation of many problemsfor effective administration. The foremost and the prominent problem was rehabilitation of the refugees.There was no place for providing them the basic requirement of shelter and for that reason, the

government provided the shelter home for them. The locality was not congenial for their adaptation. Thus

the hostility amongst the people has started generating their side effects. The civilisation is the beginning

of the governance to any nation. In absence of any co-ordination amongst the fellow citizens, the conceptof social embodiment was virtually evasive. Thus there was neither any co-operation nor co-ordination

amongst the citizens. The sole motto was to accumulate the resources for advancement and to enforce their

hypothetical illusive superiority amongst the other inhabitant. Thus there was a complete absence ofreligious and spiritual concept in the society.

That no man can survive in isolation. There is a rule of give and take. The moment, one

person is inclined to accept everything as a matter of his right, the person who is inclined to give him hisextra potential, withdraw the basic offer. This become the end of social collaboration. No country is able

to survive except by the will of the people. The bitterness amongst the people may ultimately lead to a


7/18

crisis on psychological level. Thus the country required the coercive method for the enforcement of law

and order situation. This was on account of partition of India.

That the citizens, we the people contemplating of the infringement of theindefeasible rights cannot be told for tolerating infraction or invasion of their rights anymore,which is guaranteed enough to relegate at the dawn of human rights jurisprudencepromulgated by judicial activism to fight their own battle in the forum available to them undersocial action litigation. The Honble Supreme Court has put an end to instrument of statusupholding the traditions of Anglo Saxon jurisprudence and resisting radical innovation as

honest in the use of judicial power to promote social justice. Nothing rankles more in humanheart than in justice. Access to justice is basic human right on which is dependent other rightsrelating to equality. Justice has always been the first virtue of any civilised society. Life of lawis a mean to serve the social purpose and felt necessity of people. Affirmative action promotesmaximum well being for the society as a whole and strengthens forces of National integration.The purposeful role for more active creative in deciding it by the court of law is by not whathas been but what may be. This is the role and purpose of law for the sovereign power ofwe the people as enumerated in our preamble constitution of India. Politicians act innefarious designs with impunity. Political parties motivated with vested interests are dancing tousurp power through any means, fair or foul even at the cost of sacrificing the Nationsexistence to personal interest. Party systems have pushed to advance its own schemes upon

the ruin of the rest. Our politicians are Mafia dons next to the invaders. Robbers have generallyplundered the rich who are seldom subjected to legislation always plunder the commoncitizens and protect those Mafia dons under the phraseology of law making sovereign powerhaving the connotation procedure establish under law to be cherished instead of dueprocess.

There is always an excuse for tyranny and mal-administration, which hasdegenerated the national character. The power given needs a safeguard from such arbitrarypower and unfair exercise. In present set up freedom has become an abuse and liberty aslicense. Therefore the moral damage is more terrible. An oppressive system is more to befeared than a Tiger.

Deep needs to express thought;

Profoundly sickening to compel;Remain silent at expression;

Limitation of freedom of thought;Is attack on social rights;

As spiritual force is stronger;Than any material force;

As thought leash to average conscience;By the necessities of fatal policy;

The Honble Supreme Court acted as an instrument of status quo-upholding thetraditions of Anglo-Saxon jurisprudence and resisting radical innovations in the use of the

judicial power to promote social justice under the republican constitution till early 1970 with

some Honble expectations, but in the light of a social economic philosophy alien to ourfreedom movement and aspiration of the liberated people, the Apex Court has started a givingimportance to the rule of Law with tryst with destiny. The outstanding judicial activism in thequest for social justice came by the enormous contribution of Honble Supreme Court in therecent years. The use of new found judicial power in the service of WE THE PEOPLE OFINDIA who has often being represented in the judicial forum have always been at thereceiving end of mal-administration and exploitation.

These are the extract of code of ethics of law andjudicial institution in Manu Smiriti:-9th chapter of code of Manu- Importance of Justice All the members of the court are considered as wounded, where justice is found wounded

with inequity, and judges do not extract the dart of inequity from justice or remove its blot

and destroy inequity, in other words where the innocent are not respected and the criminalare not punished. Ib 12

A virtuous and just person should never enter a court and when he does so, he shouldspeak the truth; he who holds his tongue on seeing injustice done, or speaks contrary totruth and justice, is the greatest sinner.Ib.13

Justice destroyed destroys its destroyer; and justice preserved, preserves its preserver.Hence, never destroy justice, lest being destroyed, it should destroy thee.Ib.14

In this world justice or righteousness alone is mans friend that goes with him after death.All other things or companions part on the destruction of the body and he is detached fromall company. But the company of justice is never cut off. Ib.15

When injustice is done in the government court out of partiality, it is divided into four parts

of which one is shared by the criminal or doer of injustice, the second by the witness, thethird by the judges, and the fourth by the president king of an unjust court.Ib.17


8/18

That this writ petition is moved to re-establish the truth and cultural heritage of ourCountry. This writ petition is pertaining to the world marvel, one of the Seven Wonders of theWorld, namely, Taj Mahal, and other monuments authorship attributed to Hindu Rulers, muchprior to the period of Mugal Invaders. The ancient monuments and structure are part of ourtradition and culture and evidence of glorious-marvelous architectural achievement and furtherto that it is a part of our heritage. Fraud upon history should not be perpetuated as life isevaluated in the perspective of history. For the sake of history of heritage, these monumentsshould be identified, protected and preserved properly in the right perspective with right

historical records of creation and construction of truth and realities, which includes rectifyingand/ or correcting the wrong records, notions, motivated dis-information and mis- information. In Marbury v. Madison 1 Cranch 137 (1803)-In case of conflict between law made by

parliament (Congress) and the provision of Constitution, the duty of the Court is to enforceConstitution and ignore the law.

From Ratlam Municipality v. Vardhi Chand A.I.R. 1980 S.C. 1622, the Supreme Courthas held that the concept of Public Interest Litigation is to enforce the provisions ofConstitution of India in respect of the mandate issued in Chapter III, which is more the lessthe duty caste upon the authorities for protection of Fundamental Right and to endeavor theD Directive Principle of State Policy. Article 19 Burden of Prove Nature and Extent ofRight Distinguished form statute rights - Dhram Dutt v. Union of India (2004) Vol. 1

SCC 712 a restriction on the activities of the Association is not a restriction on the activityon the individual citizen forming membership of Association Indian Council of World

Affairs Act, 2001 under challenged Right and Restriction to be dealt with Article 19 (2) to(6) Article 300A and 19 (1) (f) Tibia Collage case AIR 1962 SC 448 followed. Society isincapable of holding property.

Peoples Union of Civil liberties vs. Union of India (2004) Vol. 2 SCC 476 freedom ofSpeech includes Right of Information as a fundamental right.

Union of India vs. Naveen Jindal (2004) 2 SCC 510- flag code -Emblems and Names(pervasion of Improper use ) Act, 1950 and prevention of inserts to National Honour act,1971 fling of nation is a symbols of free expression 19 (1)(A) thus a fundamental right

American right to burn nation US flag is not approve in India. Right to fling nation is a

fundamental duty but they are subject to restriction under chapter VI A Article 51 A. Article 141 Precedent- observation form a judgement have to be considered in the light of

question refereed therein Mahatab Dawoed Shaikh vs. State of Maharastra (2004) 2SCC 362

Article 13- Government Circular- not law within its meaning- State of Kerela vs. ChandraMohanan (2004) 3 SCC 429 .

Prohibition on sale of eggs within Rishikesh municipality- Not Unreasonable Restrictionand the same should be viewed from Religious Background Major Source of Revenue tothe Municipality under section 298 -Om Prakash vs. State of U. P. (2004) 3 SCC 402.

The Honble Supreme Court has recently laid down in case of State of Karnataka Vs. Praveen Bhai

Thogadia ( Doctor) AIR 2004 SC 2081, while dealing with the ambit and scope of Article 25 and itsPreamble Secularism that the core of religion based upon spiritual values, which the Vedas,

Upnishads and Purans were said to reveal to mankind seem to be; Love others, serve others, help

ever, hurt never and sarvae jana sukhino bhavantoo. One upmanship in the name of religion,whichever it be or at whomsoevers instance it may be, would render constitutional designs

countermanded and chaos, claiming its heavy toll on society and humanity as a whole, may be the

inevitable evil consequence, whereof.

India is the worlds most heterogeneous society with a rich heritage and its Constitution is committed

to high ideas of socialism, secularism and the integrity of the nation. As is well known, several raceshave converged in this subcontinent and they have carried with them their own cultures, languages,religions and customs affording positive recognition to the noble and ideal way of life unity in

diversity. Though these diversities created problems in early days, they were mostly solved on the

basis of human approaches and harmonious reconciliation of differences, usefully and peacefully.

Whether the ambit and scope of jurisdiction covered under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

may not entail to this Honble court to decide this writ petition to expose False hood? Whether in absence of any proof through positive indications proving the construction of any

building by MUGAL INVADERS, the entire world will befouled regarding their authorship on our

ancient vedic culture Hindu monuments even after our independence and existence of fundamental

rights in Constitution Of India and guarantee therein to its citizen and our children? Whether we remain the silent spectator of the collapse of 4 minarets of our Taj Mahal due to the

control of fundamentalist under the provision of Wakf Act, 1995 in order to conceal the Hindu Palace

identity hidden inside two or three storey Red stone building?


9/18

Whether concern individual Institute of Rewriting Indian History through its Founder President, P.

N. Oak is an aggrieved person to prove his locus standi in the matter even in public interest litigationhaving the genuine cause envisaged to protect the innocent citizen from the false hood of aggressions

imposed by invaders Mughal rulers still having the reprehensible impact upon the non violent patriotic

citizens craving to protect our ancient cultural heritage Monuments.? Whether from false scaffolding their identity adversely affecting the existence of Citizens, which is

endangering the very existence of Taj Mahal, Fateh pur Sikiri and Agra Red Ford and other

Monuments, having falsehood in teaching of children, students of history the future citizens and

having character assassinations of nation by falsehood and misrepresentation to the tourists and otherforeign visitors on the dictate of Mughal minority under appeasement policy?

Whether the credentials of the petitioner Institute of Rewriting Indian History Through its FounderPresident, P. N. Oak are not sufficient for upgrading the individualistic approach as that of widely

shared approach of the majority of the members of the Public, Children and the tourists visiting our

Monuments?

Whether the submissions raised in respect the character assassination of the authority may not be

treated as public interest litigation to protect the Rule of Law and thereby to preserve theconstitution of India?

Whether Sri P.N. Oak was born on 2nd March 1917 at Indore and he fought the battle of independence

in association with Neta Jee Sri Subhash Chandra Bose and thereafter conducted the research on theancient Vedic Cultural Heritage in India and also in different part of the World.?

Whether Sri P.N. Oak is now running at the age of about 88 years having a society and a trust namelythe Institute Of rewriting History duly exempted Under Section 80-G of the Income Tax Act on

account of his research work based on vedic ancient culture and propagation thereof is the imposture

and interloper impersonating falsely as public crusader of justice and thereby acting probono publicoto assail the validly of The Ancient Monuments And Archaeological Sites And Remains Act, 1958 (as

amended to Act No. 71 of 1951)?

Whether the credentials of the petitioner are sufficient to approach as that of widely shared approach

of the majority of the members of the Public, students, spiritual leaders, and other historians?

Whether it was authorised to file litigation, If so by whom, Whether it has sufficient funds to indulgein such litigation and Basis for alleging harm to public interest- The information conveyed to the

Honble court is sufficient to entertain the present writ petition on the basis of the secondary evidence

of Badshahnama, Aurangzeb Letter of 1653, expert evidence through carbondating- 14 report andscaffolding of the original building through imposture Koranic script and closer of red stone building

below marble stone temple /graveyards at Taj Mahal and the tunnels through the lower ground portion

of Agra Red Fort connecting Fatehpur Sikri, Taj Mahal, Etmadullah and Sikandra and the symbols of

the Hindu Religion present upon them?

Whether the facts finding committee may be appointed for revealing the truth on the basis of the

writing of Sir H. M. Elliot. K.C.B.- The Posthumous Papers titled as History of India by its ownHistorian comprising of Eight Volume published by Kitab Mahal 56-A Zero Road Allahabad at

present 15 Thornhill Road Allahabad, which shall be reproduced?

Whether there be the existence of symbol like Swastik, OM, Lotus, Snake, Peacock, and Trident in

every carving out of the structure to the public at the multiple two fold graves of Sahalahan and

Mumtaj?

Whether the coconut with mango leaf put on the top of the pitcher is the symbol of worship ofHindu , Which has been concealed by scaffolding with these identities?.

What is hidden inside the dome structure, which is never allowed to be visited to its visitors?.

Whether there be any octagonal building chosen by a Mughal Ruler, which is a symbol ofrecognition of eight directions/ dimension of the universe recognize by Hindu religion?

Whether any one may imagine it as the truth that the Koranic scripts is carved out on the tiles , whichhas been pasted by removing the existing recital of Sanskrit Stanzas written by the creator of the said

temple?.

Whether the Union of India pose any justification for closing of the red stone building by placing themud on the front side up to plinth of marble construction?


10/18

Whether the Govt. of India may provide any justification for closer of the doors of the two story

building made out of the red stone visual towards the back side of the Taj Monuments with the doorspermanently sealed through its imposture stone planted from out side for hiding the truth regarding the

actual authorship of this monuments of national importance?

"It is said"

But the Maulana is not testifying to the facts. He is merely reporting what was believed. He repeatedly says, "Itis said that".

That seems to be a figure of speech with the Maulana. When describing the construction of the Quwwatul Islammosque by Qutubuddin Aibak, for instance he uses the same "It is said".

If the facts were in doubt, would a scholar of Ali Mian's diligence and commitment not have commented on themin his fullbodied foreword? Indeed, he would have decided against republishing them as he decided not torepublish much of the original book.

And if the scholars had felt that the passages could be that easily disposed of, why should any effort have beenmade to take a work to the excellence of which a scholar of Ali Mian's stature has testified in such a fullsomemanner, and what has been done to this one? And what is that?

Each reference to each of these mosques having been constructed on the sites of temples with, as in the case ofBenaras, the stones of the very temples which were demolished for that very purpose have been censored out ofthe English version of the book ! Each one of the passages on each one of the seven mosques!

Indeed there is not just censorship but substitution. In the Urdu volume we are told in regard to the mosque atKanauj for instance that "This mosque stands on an elevated ground inside the fort of Kanauj. It is well knownthat it was built on the foundation of some Hindu temple that stood here." In the English version we are told inregard to the same mosque that "It occupied a commanding site, believed to have been the place earlieroccupied by an old and decayed fort".

If the passages could have been explained away by referring to the "It is said", why would anyone have thoughtit necessary to remove these passages from the English version -- that is the version which is likely to be readby persons other than the faithful? Why would anyone bowdlerize the book of a major scholar in this way?

Conclusions

But that, though obvious, weighs little with me. The fact that temples were broken and mosques constructed intheir place is well known. Nor is the fact that the materials of the temples -- the stones and the idols -- wereused in constructing the mosque, news. It was thought that this was the way to announce hegemony. It wasthought that this was the way to strike at the heart of the conquered -- for in those days the temple was not

just a place of worship; it was the hub of the community's life, of its learning, of its social life. So the lines in thebook which bear on this practice are of no earth-shaking significance in themselves. Their real significance --and I dare say that they are but the smallest, most innocuous example that one can think of on the mosque-temple business -- lies in the evasion and concealment they have spurred. I have it on good authority that thepassages have been known for long, and well known to those who have been stoking the Babri Masjid issue.

(Several other modern Muslim historians and epigraphists accept that the fact that many other mosquesincluding the Babri Masjid at Ayodhya stand on the sites of Hindu temples.)

In painting Goddess Saraswati naked M.F. Hussein, his secularist advocates argue, is merely exercising hisFundamental Right to freedom of expression, he is merely giving form to his artistic, creative urge. The firstquestion is: How come the freedom and creative urge of the thousands and thousands of artists our country hashave never led even one of them to ever paint or draw a picture of Prophet Muhammad in which his face ismanifest? I am not on the point of dress or undress, the features could have been made as celestial andhandsome as our artists could have imagined -- why is it that they never got the urge to draw or sculpt even the

handsomest representation of the Prophet?The rationalization is that doing so would have hurt the religious sentiments of the Muslims, the Prophet himselfhaving forbidden all representations. The reason, as distinct from the rationalization, is different: were an artistto make such a representation Muslims would be ignited by their controllers to riot, they would not let that artistlive in peace thereafter.

Notice first that in the lexicon of those who are shouting for Hussein the point about not hurting religioussentiments manifestly does not apply to the Hindus: in their case the alternate principle of the right of the artistto paint as he pleases takes precedence. The Hindus notice this duality more and more.

Indeed they notice the length to which some are prepared to exercise their right to give full rein to their creativeurge, disregarding what Hindus might feel as a consequence. As recently as August last year, the art gallery ofthe INDIA TODAY group, ART TODAY held an exhibition of "modern Indian miniatures". Prominent among thepaintings on display was one that showed a naked ( that is, completely naked ) Radha astride a naked ( that is,completely naked ) Lord Krishna -- the two fornicating in a garden. Posters with this painting prominently

featured were put up inviting viewers to the gallery. The August, 1995 issue of the magazine, INDIA TODAYcarried an advertisement -- urging readers to purchase prints of paintings which were on display at the gallery,the advertisement too featured prominently the same painting of Radha laying Lord Krishna in a garden. Somepersons protested. No one heeded them. A demonstration was then held outside the gallery, the demonstratorsentered the gallery. The painting was taken down. Friends who heard of the incident denounced the

demonstrators: "Hindu bigots", "The saffron brigade on the look-out for issues," "Fascist goons who want toimpose their constipated brand of Hinduism on everyone." To establish the principle, and even more todemonstrate the scorn in which they held "these goons" another publication, 'The India Magazine', asdemonstrative about its secular credentials, put that very painting on its cover. That this was done with fullknowledge that doing so was likely to offend others is evident from the fact that, simultaneously with putting thepainting on the cover, the person most prominently associated with 'The India Magazine' applied for anticipatorybail.

Now, the collections of hadis contain scores and scores of descriptions of the Prophet, as they contain accounts

-- accounts in the words and on the testimony of the Prophet's wives themselves -- about his relations with hiswives; how is it that none of our artists have ever felt the creative urge to portray even accurately any of thosedescriptions, to say nothing of these magazines ever inviting their readers to purchase colorful reproductions ofthe paintings or putting the paintings on their covers and posters. Indeed I have not the least doubt that if theyreceived even an article -- which, after all, can never be as tantalizing as a Hussein painting -- an article which


11/18

did no more than reproduce verbatim those accounts, they would refuse to print it: all the great principles aboutnot hurting the religious sentiments of others, all the provisions of law -- sections 153A, 295A, 298 -- will be

invoked in justification. But when it comes to a painting of a naked Radha astride a naked Lord Krishnafornicating in a garden, carrying it in advertisements, putting that on the cover is a Fundamental Right, to objectto it is to throttle an artist's right to give expression to his creative urge.

It is not the freedom of expression these worthies are committed to. They are committed to their havingfreedom alone: can you recall a single liberal protesting against the ban on Ram Swarup's Understanding IslamThrough Hadis -- a book so scrupulously academic that it was but a paraphrase of the Sahih Muslim, one of the

canonical compilations of hadis -- to say nothing of any one of them deigning to put in a word against goondas-- claiming to represent the Muslims -- who tried to get at me in Hyderabad or the goondas -- claiming to speak

for the other lot these worthies champion, the "Dalits" -- who did get at me in Pune? Not one deigned to do so.They are not the champions and practitioners of free speech, they are the practitioners of a very special brand ofthe dialectic: Strong to the weak, Weak to the strong. And that is what the Hindus are noticing: neither thegallery nor the magazine spared a thought for the religious sentiments it might offend till the "goons" marchedinto the gallery, but they had but to march in and the painting was immediately taken down; Hussein was alldefiance one day, but the moment some paintings of his were burnt, he was suddenly sorry....

"But nude representations are a part of our tradition. Look at Konark, look at Khajuraho," the advocates havebeen shouting. But what has the figure of a woman being had by a dog in Konark have to do with worship ?What basis is there for declaring the women portrayed there are Saraswati or Sita or Lakshmi ? And then, as areader points out, there is the other consideration : depicting women completely naked has for centuries beenvery much a part of European painting and sculpture tradition; but do the artists not stop at using this traditionfor portraying Virgin Mary naked?

And as for Saraswati being depicted naked, her image is set out in our iconography, in the mantras by which we

invoke her; in all these she is referred to as "....yaa shubhra vastraavritaa....", as one "draped in white". Thatwhite dress draping her is one of the four distinguishing marks of representations of Goddess Saraswati -- theother three being that she holds beads in one hand, a book in another and the vina in a third.

"But I have every right to portray her as I will," a secular friend protested when I repeated to him thisiconographic description to which one of the best known and sagacious authorities on our art had drawn myattention. Assume you do, but then you can't simultaneously claim that what you are doing is in accord with thattradition. Second, if painting Goddess Saraswati naked is an intrinsic part of our tradition because sundrywomen have been depicted naked and fornicating in Khajuraho and Konark, then, my dear friend, what aboutthe Dasham Granth of Guru Govind Singh and its 300 treyi chitra? How come not one of you has ever beenstirred by his creative urge to put on canvas any of those -- most vivid and vigourous -- pen-portraits? Is thework of Guru Govind Singh any less a part of the Sikh tradition than the Gita Govind? What about the scores andscores of hadis I mentioned earlier ? Alongside the Quran, they are not just any old element of Islam, they arethe very foundation. Let us see you affirm the right of artists to depict images -- not imagined ones, not ones

that depart from the mantras as the painting in question does, just the most scrupulously faithful and exactimages -- of what is described therein.

The next argument of our artists and intellectuals is just as much a manufacture of convenience: "All ourreligions, everything about our past is the common heritage of all of us, it belongs to each of us equally," theyhave been saying. This presumably has been done to preempt those who would say that Hussein is particularlyin the wrong to have painted Hindu goddesses naked because he is a Muslim. Fine. But how come so many of

you are up in arms when I write on Islamic law? In particular, how come you work up such a fury even though,unlike a painter, I am not conjuring up an image and am instead documenting every single sentence andparagraph with the exact text of the sacred works of Islam? What happens at that time to this principle of all ourreligions and everything in our past being the common heritage that belongs to each one of us equally? Thenthese very magazines and intellectuals are full of sanctimonious sermons: If members of one religion startcommenting on the practices and beliefs of other religions, there will be hell to pay, they proclaim.

It is this double-standard which outrages the Hindus more and more, it is this which these inchoate outbursts

are revolts against.

The Justice Rajinder Sachar Committee report on social, economic and educational status of Muslimsacross the country was tabled in Lok Sabha on Thursday.The committee has favoured a group of Muslims with traditional occupations as that of scheduledcastes be designated as most backward classes and provided 'multifarious measures,' includingreservation. The panel has said Muslims in the country have three groups in terms of their socialstructure. These are ashrafs, ajlafs and arzals."The three groups require different types of affirmativeaction," said the report, tabled by Minority Affairs Minister A R Antulay.Of the three groups, arzalswhose traditional occupation is similar to that of SCs, may be designated as MBCs and providedreservation. This particular group, the panel said, needs multifarious measures including reservation asit remains 'cumulatively oppressed.'Antulay later told reporters that the report is the 'best thing' that hashappened to the community. The issue of reservation has been dealt in the chapter on 'Muslim OBCs

and Affirmative Action.'The number of Muslims in security agencies was 3.2 per cent -- 60,517 out of the total of 18,79,134 inCRPF, CISF, BSF, SSB and 'other agencies,' it said without specifying whether armed forces wereincluded or not. The Muslims' headcount in the armed forces sought by the panel had triggered acontroversy in Parliament sometime back.Observing that a 'very small' proportion of government/public sector employees are Muslims,concentrated in lower level positions, the panel recommended that it may be desirable to have minority

persons on interview panels. This can be done on the lines of SC/ST participation in panels, it said.The committee recommended constitution of a 'equal opportunity commission' to look into grievancesof deprived groups. It said an example of such a policy tool is the UK Race Relations Act, 1976.Such ameasure while providing a redressal mechanism for different types of discrimination will give a furtherreassurance to minorities that any unfair action against them will invite the vigilance of the law, it said.

Noting that Muslim participation in electoral bodies is known to be small, the report said of the 543 LokSabha members, only 33 are Muslims. The panel made out a strong case to put mechanisms in placeto enable Muslims to engage in democratic processes and governance. "Mere material change will notbring about the true empowerment of the minorities; they need to acquire and be given the required


12/18

collective agency."It said a carefully conceived 'nomination procedure' can be worked out to increasethe participation of minorities at grassroots. Mechanism should be put in place so that a large numberof minorities are indeed nominated to increase their participation in public bodies. It has suggested thatthe steps taken by Andhra Pradesh to promote participation of deprived sections in elected bodiescould be used to enhance Muslim participation in the decision-making processes. Noting that over thelast 60 years, minorities have scarcely occupied adequate public spaces, it said the participation ofMuslims in 'nearly all political spaces is low, which can have an adverse impact on Indian society and

polity in the long run.' "Given the power of numbers in a democratic polity, based on universalfranchise, minorities in India lack effective agency and political importance," the 404-page report said.

The minorities, it said, 'do not have the necessary influence or the opportunity to either change or eveninfluence events, which enable their meaningful and active participation in development process.' Thecommittee has recommended elimination of anomalies with respect to reserved constituencies underthe delimitation schemes. "A more rational delimitation procedure that does not reserve constituencieswith high minority population shares for SCs will improve the opportunity for minorities, especiallyMuslims, to contest and get elected to Parliament and state assemblies," the report said. Referring toeducational opportunities for Muslims, the committee recommended mechanisms where madrassa canbe linked with a higher secondary school board so that students wanting to shift to aregular/mainstream education can do so after having passed from a madrassa. It recommendedrecognition of degrees from madrassas for eligibility in competitive examinations such as civil services,banks, defence services and other such examinations. It also suggested that a process of evaluatingthe content of the school textbooks needed to be initiated and institutionalised.The seven-member

committee was constituted by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in March this year and its tenure wasextended till November 30. The report has come against the backdrop of the prime minister'sobservation that Muslims should get a 'fair share' in government jobs, which had triggered a debate.The formation of the committee had created uproar in Parliament due to the committee's reported moveto seek a head count of Muslims in armed forces. PM Man Mohan Singh and Kalam the Presidentshould ask Paki-Bangli Chini Stans to educate Indian Moslems as these regions were carved out orsnatched out of Hindu territoris. In there high level- foregion ministories level or head hancho levelsshould make these core issues and ask the to give southern Sindh -as part of peace process- toSindhis. These area should be called Autonomous region of Hindu-Sthan.Can these top-jkers comprehend these? Can Achar/Sachar digest this?What the mind does not know the eyes don't see and ears don't hear.What a pity the dumb stupid Hindus still think alien religions and their replications will bring them

freedom and prosperity! The Committee was setup by the UPA government on March 9th, 2005 tostudy the Socio-Economic and Educational status of the Muslims in India. It was headed by JusticeRajender Sachar and had six other members Shri Sayyid Hamid, Dr T.K. Ooman, Shri M.A. Basith, Dr

Akhtar Majeed, Dr Abu Saleh Shariff and Dr Rakesh Basant.The Sachar committee report has a wholechapter dedicated to the politically controversial issue of Muslim demographic trends in India.Therelevant pages in the document are from Page no 48 to 68.The report says that according to the 2001census the Muslim population in the country was enumerated at 138 Million. The report estimates thatas of 2006 it must have crossed 150 Million people. The report confirms that Muslims have higher

population growth rates and higher fertility rates than the rest of the population even when adjusted toregional variations such as the North(with a higher population growth rates) or south(with nearreplacement level growth rates). In both instances the Muslim Population growth rate is slightly higherthan that of the other Socio-religious communities in the said region. The report also says that Muslims

have the most favourable child sex ratio among all Socio-religious communities in the country. Anaverage of 986 females to every 1000 males compared to 927/1000 for the general population. Theyhave a lower rate of Infant mortality compared to the rest of the population but paradoxically have ahigher incidence of child under-nourishment cases. Muslims have a younger age profile compared tothe general population. The Muslim Population has for historical reasons a more urban profile than therest of the population. According to the 2001 census 35.7% of the Muslim population was urbancompared to 27.8% for the overall population.

Spatial distribution- Numerically, the majority of the Muslims in India are living in four states UP,Bihar, West Bengal and Maharashtra which had atleast ten million Muslims each. UP has the largestMuslim population in India with 22% of Indias muslims living there according to the 2001 census i.e.,around 30 million people. The other states with a significant Muslim population are Kerala, AP, Assam,Jammu & Kashmir and Karnataka with a population of between five to ten million Muslims each.Rajasthan, Gujarat, MP, Jharkhand and Tamil Nadu have a Muslim population of between 3 to 5 millioneach. Delhi, Haryana and Uttaranchal have one to two million each. With regard to the district wisedistribution. The report says that of the 593 districts in India only 20 had a Muslim majority. Of them 9are predominantly Muslim, i.e., with over 75% Muslim population; these include Lakshadweep andeight districts in Jammu & Kashmir. The other 11 districts have between 50 to 75% Muslim

population.These districts are six from Assam, two from J&K, and one each from WB, Bihar andKerala. Numerically about 13% of Indias Muslims i.e., nearly 18 Million people lived in these districts. Afurther 38 districts had a significant Muslim population of between 25% to 50%. These were distributedin a number of states as follows. UP- 12, WB- 5, Kerala- 5, Assam- 4, Bihar- 3, Jharkhand- 2, Delhi- 2,and one each in AP, Haryana, J&K, Uttaranchal and Pondicherry. Numerically these districtsaccounted for 22% of the Muslim population i.e., around 30 Million people. In about 182 districts theMuslim population was between 10 to 25% of the population. These districts accounted for nearly 47%

of the Muslim Population ie., around 65 Million people. So of the 593 districts in India, 240 districts witha significant Muslim population of atleast 10% and above have nearly 82% of Indias Muslim

population, i.e., nearly 113 Million people. A further 77 districts have most of the remaining share of18% i.e., nearly 25 million.


13/18

Demographic processes- The report considers population change as a product of three processes-

Mortality, Fertility and Migration.Mortality- The report says that the Muslim child mortality in bothindicators i.e., IMR(Infant mortality rate) and U5MR (Under five mortality rate) is lower than the average

of the overall population. The report attributes it to probably higher levels of urbanisation among Indian

Muslims and points out that within urban areas the Muslim child mortality rates is closer to the averagemortality rates prevalent in urban India.Fertility- The report endorses the various surveys such as NFHS-

1, NFHS-2 and the Census which shows higher than average TFR(Total Fertility Rates) for Muslims when

compared to the overall population. The TFR for Muslims is supposedly higher by 0.7 to 1 percentage

point than the average for the rest of the population. Also other measures of fertility such as CBR(crudebirth rate) is also higher at 30.8 compared to 25.9 for the total population. But the report stresses that the

overall trend since the past two decades has been a decline in fertility rate among all religious groups

including the Muslims. It shows that in the southern states where population growth rates are lower thanthe north the TFR for Muslims stands at 2.5 to 2.8 quite close to the prevailing population growth rates in

the South of the country. The report also says that the use of contraception is widely prevalent among

Muslims but to a lesser degree than the average for the overall population. In contraceptive prevalence ratethere is a supposed gap of 10% between the Muslims and the average. The report also says that reversible

methods of contraception are more favoured by Muslim couples rather than non-reversible methods such

as sterilisation. As per the report atleast one third of the Muslim couples were reported to be using somesort of contraception.Migration- The report says that the contribution of Migration to the growth

differential has been very small. It stresses that much of the population growth can be explained withrespect to the higher fertility rates and lower child mortality rates among Muslims and the perception that

there has been considerable international migration (an eupheism for illegal Bangladeshi immigration) ofMuslims into India is not correct. But it does not give any stats to prove its case that the widespread illegal

Bangladeshi immigration into India has been as inconsequential as it claims it to be.

Justice Rajendra Sachar Report is the warrant of Slavery. There is no concession in the Name of a Religion

in our preamble of constitution. The basic Structure of Constitution Prohibits it and Article 14 and 16

restricts any such type of reservation on caste basis. Smt. Sonia Gandhi Is disqualified to becom themember of paliament. Indira Gandhi was a Muslim as Firoz Khan alias GANDHI S/O Nawab Khan Of

Junagarh was. The Gandhi And Nehru Dynasty Were Anti Muslims. Rajeev Gandhi Was Roman

Chatholic namely Rajeev Rabortro and the name of Rahul Gandhi Is RAUL ROBORTO an d PRIYANKAname is actually vaintika Roborto who married in same caste as Disclosed from The Writing and Articles

written by A. Ghose supplement By Great Nationalist Shri R.V.Bhasin of Bombay Mow Mumbai , Who

after retirement is a practicing Advocate Of Bombay High Court and Honble Supreme Court.

Ecological misbalances and global warming on account of killing of innocent animals under the guise ofproviding salvation under Islam

Environment is a difficult word to define. Its normal meaning relates to the surroundings, butobviously that it is a concept which is relatable to whatever object it is which is surrounded.Einstein had once observed, The environment is everything that is nt me. About one and half

century ago, in 1854, as the famous story goes the wise Indian Chief of Seattle replied to theoffer of the great. White Chief in Washington to by their land. The reply is profound. It isbeautiful. It is timeless. It contains the wisdom of the ages. It is first over and the mostunderstanding statement on environment. The whole of it is worth quoting as any extract fromit is to destroy its beauty.How can you buy or sell the sky, the warmth of the land? The idea is strange to us.If we do not own the freshness of the air and the sparkle of the water, how can you buy them?Every part of the earth is sacred to my people. Every shining pine needle, every sandy shore,every mist in the dark woods, every cleaning and humming insect is holy in the memory andexperience of my people. The sap which courses through the trees carries the memories of thered man.

The white mans dead forget the country of their birth when they go to walk among the stars.Our dead never forget this beautiful earth, for it mother of the red man. We are part of the earthand it is part of us. The perfumed flowers are our sisters, the horse, the great eagle, these areour brothers. The rocky creats, the juices in the meadows, the body heat of the pony, andman-all belong to the same family.So, when the Great Chief in Washington sends word and he wishes to buy our land, he asksmuch of us. The Great Chief sends word he will reserve us a place so that we can livecomfortably to ourselves. He will be our father and we will be his children. So we will consideryour offer to buy our land. But it will not be easy. For this land is sacred to us.This shining water moves is the stream and rivers is not just water but the blood of ourancestors. If we sell you land, you must remember that it is sacred, and you must teach your

children that is sacred and that each ghostly reflection in the clear water of the lakes tells ofevent and memories in the life of people. The waters murmur is the voice of my fathers father.


14/18

The rivers are our brothers, they quench our thirst. The river carry our canoes, and feed ourmust remember, and teach your children, that the river are our brothers, and yours and youmust hence forth give the kindness your would give any brother.We know that the white man does understand our ways. Our portion of land is the same to himas the next, for he is a strange who comes in the night and takes from the land whatever heneeds. The earth is not his brother but his enemy and when he has conquered it, he moves on.He leaves his fathers graves behind, and he does not care.He kidnaps the earth from his children. His fathers grave and his childrens birth right are

forgotten. He treats his mother, the earth, and forgotten. He treats his mother, the earth, andhis brother, the sky, as things to be bought, plundered, sold like sheep or bright beads. Hisappetite will devour the earth and leave behind only a desert.I do not know. Our ways are different from your ways. The sight of your cities pains the eyes ofred man. But perhaps it is because the red man is a savage and does not understand.There is on quiet place in the white mans cities. No place to hear the unfurling of leaves inspring or the rustle of in insects wings. But perhaps it is because I am a savage and do notunderstand. The clatter only seems to insult the ears. And what is there in life if a man cannothear the lonely cry of the whippoorwill or the arguments of the frogs around a pond at night? Iam a red man and do not understand. The prefers the soft sound of the wind darting over theface of a pond, and the smell of the wind itself, cleansed by a mid-day rain, or scented with the

pinon pine.The air is precious to the red man, for all things share the same breath-the beast, the tree, theman, they all share the same breath. The white man does not seem to notice the air hebreathes. Like a man lying for many days, he is numb to the stench. But if we sell you our land,you must remember that the air is precious to us, that the air shares its spirit with all the life itsupports. The wind that gave our grandfather his first breath also receives the last sign. And ifwe sell you land, you must keep it apart and sacred as a place where even the white man cango to taste the wind that is sweetened by the meadows flowers.So we will consider your offer to buy our land. If we decide to accept. I will make one condition.The white man must treat the beasts of this land as his brothers.I am a savage and I do not understand any other way. I have seen thousand rotting buffaloes

on the prairie, left by the white man who shot them from a passing train. I am a savage and Ido not understand how the smoking iron horse can be important than the buffalo that we killonly to stay alive.What a man without beasts? If all the beasts were gone, man would die from a great lonelinessof spirit. For whatever happens to the beasts soon happens to man. All things are connected.You must teach your children that the ground beneath their feet is the ashes do ourgrandfathers, so that they will respect the land. Tell your children that the earth is rich with thelives of our kin. Teach your children what we have taught our children, that the earth is ourmother. Whatever befalls the earth befalls the son of the earth. If man spit upon the ground,they spit upon themselves.This we know: The earth does not belong to man, man belongs to the earth. This we know: All

things are connected like the blood which unites one family. All things are connected.Whatever befalls the earth befalls the sons of the earth. Man did not wave the web of life; he ismerely a stand in it. Whatever he does to the web he does to himself.Even the white man, whose God walks and talks with him as friend to friend cannot be exemptfrom the common destiny. We may be brother after all. We shall see. One thing we know,which the white man may one day discover-our God is the same God. You may think now thatyou own him as you wish to own our land; but you cannot. He is the God man, and hiscompassion is equal for the red man and the white. This earth is precious to him, and to harmthe earth is to heap contempt on the creator. The white too shall pass perhaps sooner than allother tribes. Contaminate your bed and you will one night suffocate in your own waste.But in your perishing you will shine brightly, fried by the strength of the God who brought you

this land and for some special purpose gave you dominion over this land and over the redman. That destiny is a mystery to us, for we do not understand when the wild buffaloes areslaughtered, the wild horse are tamed, the secret corners of the forest heavy with scent ofmany men and the view of the ripe hills blotted by talking wires. Where is the thicket? Gone,where is the eagle? Gone. The end of living and the beginning of survival.It would be hard find out such dawn to earth description of nature. Nature hates monopoliesand knows no exception. It has always some levelling agency that puts the overbearing, thestrong, the rich, the fortunate substantially on the same ground with all others andZarathustra. Environment is polycentric and multi-facet problem affecting the human existence.The Stokholm Declaration of United Nation on Human Environment, 1972, reads its PrincipleNo. 3, inter alia, thus:

Man has the fundamental right to freedom, equality, and adequate condition of life. In anenvironment of equality that permits a life of dignity and well being and bears a solemnresponsibility to protect and improve the environment for present and future generations.


15/18

Many Hindus also notice the other thing -- the one I mentioned as the reason as against the rationalization forno artist ever being galvanized by the creative urge when it comes to painting the features of the Prophet. They

notice that the artists do not do so, not because these masters cannot do so, nor because their muse nevergoads them in this direction, but because they know that, were they to do so, they would be set upon. And thatthe State -- which is weak, and which also has internalized the same double-standards to rationalize itsweakness -- will not come to their rescue. Therefore, more and more Hindus are concluding that we too shouldacquire the same reputation, we too should acquire the same capacity. In a word, three things are teaching theHindus to become Islamic: the double-standards of the secularists and the State, the demonstrated success ofthe Muslims in bending both the State and the secularists by intimidation, and the fact that both the State andthe secularists pay attention to the sentiments of Hindus only when the Hindus become a little Islamic.

The secularists' shout, "But these things destroy the very basis of our culture." The Hindus see that argument asbeing no better than the Devil quoting the Scripture, or, to put it in words the secularists would find morepersuasive, than my quoting the Quran: for they know that these are the very persons who have been deridingthem for living a life rooted in that culture, they are the ones who have been denouncing that culture and everything associated with it -- the idols, the beliefs, the rituals -- as being nothing but devices which the Brahminshave forged to perpetuate inequity, to perpetuate exploitation of the poor masses.

The arguments of the secularists therefore are mere pretense. Yet I believe that it was plain wrong to break thewindow-panes and burn the paintings. Free speech is vital for our country. If it is curbed, what will be killed isnot a painting but reform -- for all reform offends as it is a voice against the way things are at that moment. Ibelieve that even if one's singular concern is Hinduism and its rehabilitation, free speech is the best guarantee:the more Eastern religions -- Hinduism, Buddhism and others -- are subjected to critical inquiry the more theirluminescent essence shines forth; by contrast the Semitic religions -- down to Marxism-Leninism -- wither at thefirst exposure to exegesis and inquiry: and the controllers of these religions have been very conscious of this,

that is why they have for centuries together put inquiry down with a lethal hand. The twin principles which thechampions of Hussein's right to paint as he will have been proclaiming are the exact pincer which will work --the principle that there must be freedom of speech and that every religion, and the principle that every aspect ofour past is the common heritage of each of us equally. All we should ensure is that these principles hold good forall equally. And when someone paints like Hussein did in this instance, instead of burning his paintings weshould use them to document the double-standards which mar current policies and discourse, and demand thateither the standard apply to all or to none. Thus : education, not burning; parity, not suppression.

In Hussein's case in particular, I feel that the youngsters who took offence missed a very vital point -- not justabout his painting but about his life. He is and has continued to be a Muslim. Now, as anyone who has readanything about the Prophet knows, the Prophet cursed and detested those who made representations of things.He put pictures at par with dogs, and, remember, he had all dogs killed. "The angels do not enter a house," hedeclared on the authority of the angel, Gabriel, "which contains a dog or pictures." Abu Huraira, the source of alarge proportion of the hadis, states that God's Messenger narrated that Gabriel had promised to visit him oneday but didn't turn up, and so, when he came the next day, the Prophet inquired as to what had happened.Gabriel, the Prophet narrated, said, "I came to you last night and was prevented from entering simply by thefact that there were images at the door, for there was a figured curtain with images on it and there was a dog inthe house. So, order that the head of the image which is at the door of the house be cut off so that it maybecome like the form of a tree; order that the curtain be cut up and made into two cushions spread out on whichpeople may tread; and order that the dog be put out." "God's Messenger," the hadis concludes, "then did so."His wife, Aisha tells us, "The Prophet never left in his house anything containing figures of a cross withoutdestroying it." She recalls how the Prophet reprimanded her for two cushions she had made because theycontained pictures. The Prophet declared that those who made representations of things "will receive theseverest punishment on the day of resurrection," that "Everyone who makes representations of things will go tohell." He declared them to be "the worst of God's creatures." He put them at par with "the one who kills aprophet, or who is killed by a prophet, or kills one of his parents." [ Several other hadis, and of course severalinstances can be cited; for the few which have been quoted see, Mishkat Al-Masabih, Muhammad Ashraf,Lahore, Volume II, Book XXI, Chapter V, pp. 940-44. ]

Hussein on the contrary has made painting images his very life. Therefore, in a very deep sense, his entire life isan endeavour to open an aperture in that wall of prohibitions. It has been a banner for liberalism, indeed forliberation.

I

India- An Evil Paradise

Documents

Transcript of India- An Evil Paradise