Index
-
Upload
eric-jimenez -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Index
Index
Activities Activity systems approach, bridging gap ability to engage in, 171–172 coding and classification issues, 264–265 context influencing activity patterns,
day and time of day, 72 environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) ex-
posure, 73 impact on time use in disabled persons, 177 investigation of specific activities, 263 life cycle, 130–131 location of, 71 media usage, 73 Alzheimer’s disease other aspects, 73
between time-space and travel survey approaches, 13–14
Adoption, becoming parents, 163 Adult education, free time aspect, 53 Age, see also Disabilities, life with; Elderly;
264
Time-budget research on elders
Allocation of time: see Life cycle
existing resources for data collection,
interviewing individual, their family and
probes for understanding context of ex-
process of understanding leisure ability,
predictors of quality of life in elderly dis- 252–253abled persons, 176
psychological states, 73 friends, 253 secondary activities, 72 social partners during, 71–72 perience, 254
Activity coding biases in time-budget research on elders, 252–255
116–117 progressive disease, 251–252 in diary surveys, 70 1985 national study location codes, 71
computer file format, 73,76
reviewing patient's charts, 252
activity dimensions of episode, 27-28contextual analysis, 37-40
Study (1986),33–35
Analysis issues Activity data
time diaries for collection, 19–20 derived measures, Canadian Time-Use Activity frequency and duration surveys,
measurement approach, 4 Activity sequence, temporal measure from
time-diary studies, 37 participation, 32–36 Activity settings
descriptive measures, 28_32 episode sampling, 41–42
primary and derived activity measures,
primary measures, 28–29
sequence analysis, 40–41
activities and, Canada 1992,39 contextual analysis, 37–40 hypercodes, 39 integrating concept into sequence ap-
meal preparation, 29
Canadian Time-Use Study (1986), 30–32
proach, 41 subjective dimensions, 28
269
270 Index
Analytical approaches Aotearoa (New Zealand) ( cont.)traditional proverb, 228–229 traditional time, 212–215
data collection, 93–103 direct measurement of subjective as-
discovery and development of new, 266 episode analysis, 96–98 sampling with analytic intent, 93–96
triangulation, 101–103 analyses, 116 Anthropology, interest in time use re-
Aotearoa (New Zealand), see also Maori so-
age of enlightenment in industrial Eng-
asserting first time in declaration of inde-
colonial experience, 215–219 definition in Maori society, 212 development of unique New Zealand
identity, 227–228 early contact between British and Maori,
217–218
pects, 98–100 unemployment rates, 221,223
Bacon, Francis, age of enlightenment, 215Basic, level of abstraction for time-budget
Beeperssearch, 8 collecting time use or activity data, 4
technique for validity of time diaries, 82 ciety Biological and sociocultural perspectives
biological needs impetus for time use,
comparison of Luckmann's and Fraser's
concept of time beyond biological, 192 conversational model for interview, 202–
critical research paradigm, 195,197–198 data collection methods, 200–208 in-depth interviewing for data collection,
ethology approach, 194examples of, 190 field observation for data collection, 201 gene-environmental action model, 194 history of ideas for data collection, 205–
influence of sociocultural forces and val-
integration
land, 215-216 190–1 91
pendence, 218 temporal models, 193
203
influence of Maori and Pakeha cultures, 228 201–203Ka Awatea, the dawning, 227-229likening process of civilization to Te Po,
median total income by occupation, 221,
modem time/space distancing, 217 208occupations of Maori and non-Maori
men and women, 220–221,222 perception of time in Enlightenment age,
216proportion of Maori within New Zea-
land population, 220–221 qualitative time in sociology realm, 226–
227 197 quality and sense of time closer to Maori
condition, 228 sociocultural temporal integra- quantitative nature of studies, 226 time research paradigms, 194-198
night journey, 219
223
ues, 192–194
of nature and nurture, 191 of research approaches, 198-200
qualitative research paradigm, 195,197 quantitative research paradigms, 195–
recognition of biological and
tion, 192
and social order, English colonists,
and time use in contemporary New
promised and lost, treaty of Waitangi,
study example combining time use diary 216–217 and in-depth interview, 203–204
temporary nature of, 190–194Zealand, 220–227 time use providing data on, 189–190
useful information for social, political, 218–219 and health planners, 198–200
Biological factors in activity participation
Birth statistics, Canadian crude birthrate
time usemethodology in "Testing Time" pilot, model, 77/78
226pilot survey (1990), 223–226 (CBR),159–161
Index 271
British: see English colonists
Bureau of Labor Statistics, pilot national
Business administration, interest in time
Computer file formats
activity file, 73, 76 fixed-field format, 75–76
for time-diary data, 73–76 variable field, 73/75
variable fixed versus fixed field, 74
time use study, 6
use research, 8
Camera monitoring of television audiences, Contextual analysis, activities and activity
validity of time diaries, 82
Canada Conversational model, in-depth interview,
settings, 37–40
regular data collection regimen, 7 202–203
time use studies, 6 Cook, Captain James, see also Aotearoa
Canadian crude birthrate (CBR), increase
Canadian General Social Survey (1986) leisure among men and women, 13
subjective measure of happiness, 12
(New Zealand); English colonists in, 159-161 early contact with Maori society, 217–218
Copernicus, legacy of, 215 Critical research paradigm, biological and
sociocultural perspectives, 195, Canadian Pilot Nationwide Survey (1981), 197–198
diary study in Canada, 69 Critical text analysis
Canadian Time-Use Study (1986) history of ideas, 205–208
research methodology, 205 derived measures, 33–35
primary measures, 30–32 Cultural events, free time aspect, 53 Caregivers: see Elderly
Child care Data collection concern in developed countries, 11
mean duration for life-cycle groups by
analytical approach, 93–103
descriptive approach, 92–93
issues with bearing on current and fu-
regular regimens for various countries, 7
example of time-of-day'differences, 72
regarding activities, 72
number in diary design, 23
random versus convenient in diary de-
day of week, 140
Children ture research, 266
economic value concern in developing
life cycle, 130–131
single parenthood, 131 time use, concern in developed coun-
tries, 11
Japanese elderly, 234–236 sign, 23
data, 114–116 Descriptive measures
tion model, 78-80
countries, 11 Day and time of day
Days
Chinese, comparing Korean with, and
Chronic impairment, study using proxy
Chronological factors, in activity participa-
Collection guidelines duration, 36–37
diary frequency, 36
Descartes, age of enlightenment, 215
data analysis issue, 28–37 data collection, 92–93
content, 24–25 participation, 32–36
design, 22–24
respondent population choice, 20– background data, 25
closed versus open interval, 22 sample size, 21 content, 24–25
sampling of respondents, 20–21 design, 22_24
time of year for collection, 21 number of days, 23
time use data, 20–25 open versus coded category, 22
personal versus telephone interview, 23–
Diary, see also Time diaries
21
Comparative or cross-cultural analyses,
time-budget data, 128–129 24
272 Index
Diary ( cont.) Disabilities, life with ( cont.)relevant variables for time use, 173 sample size issue, 179 sampling and data collection, 178–179 study of time use, 170–171 Time Use Questionnaire, 180,182 use of time or activity patterns, 170 validity and reliability of time use dia-
Doers (participants), primary descriptive
random versus convenient days, 23 sample of completed time diary, 56,57 subjective dimensions, 24–25 yesterday versus tomorrow basis, 22–23
family care time, 50–51
free time, 51–54 interrelations between four basic types of
personal care and travel time, 51 uses of, 48-54 Domestic activities work time, 48-50
Diary data, see also Time-diary data
ries, 181
measure, 28–29 time, 50
concern in developed countries, 11 mean duration for life-cycle groups by
Duration (time), data analysis issue, 36–
Diary method: see Time-diary method
Dimensions, data analysis issue, 27–28 Dining out, mean duration for life-cycle
Direct measurement of subjective aspects,
Direct observation model, 78,80
day of week, 139
37groups by day of week, 143
98–100 Ecological factors in activity participation
Economic accounts alternative to time estimates and time di-
data collection method, 178 qualitative method of time use studies, 4
appropriate sampling frame, 179 comparing activities before and after dis-
ability, 174–175 participation model, 78,79 conceptual model of time use by persons
with physical disability, 174 consideration of time use by rehabilita-
tion professionals, 183 elders definition of disability issue, 179 impact nese in Canada, 234–236
care recipients, 238–240
well-being of, 237–238
aries, 62 application of time use research, 9 interest in time use research, 8 mismeasurement of, 11
Disabilities, life with Economic value of children, concern in de- veloping countries, 11
Education, social status factor in activity
Elderly, see also Alzheimer's disease; Ger-
ontology; Leisure-time budget re- search; Time-budget research on
comparing Korean to Japanese and Chi-
daily activity patterns for caregivers and
development of social environments for
effect of institutionalization on activity,
quality of life in disabled persons, 176
at level of caregivers, 174 of demographic variables on time use,
176–178impairment factors, 175 methodological considerations for exam-
procedures for collecting time use data,
reintegration of persons, 169–170
ining time use, 178–183 249–250
180–183 therapeutic recreation increasing social, emotional, and physical abilities
relationship between disability and use of,249–251of time, 173-178 time budget and older persons, 247–
time budgets investigating degree of so-cial integration of aged ethnic mi- norities, 233–234
Electronic trackers, alternative to time esti-mates and time diaries, 62
relationships 248 among time use, health, and well-
between social support and time use,
between time use and outcomes, 176
being, 171–173
175–176
Index 273
Employment status Family life cycle ( cont.)impact on life cycle, 148 leisure based on work status, 13 life cycle, 130–131
global reciprocity, 164–165 involuntarily childless, 162–163 long-term orientation and attachment,
on time and off time phenomena, 165 redefinition by double-income couples,
response to unemployment, 161–162 structural social context for family rela-
support of young-adult children, 162–
work and, balancing time, 158–159
Endeavor, Captain Cook in New Zealand, 156–157217–218
English colonists, see also Aotearoa (New
Zealand); Maori society 160–161 age of enlightenment, 215–216 perception of time, 216 time and social order, 216–217 tions, 157–158
Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) expo-
Episode sampling sure during activities, 73 165
analytic approach, 96–98
primary descriptive measure, 28–29
Field observation, data collection method,
Fitness and sports activity, free time aspect,
Fixed field format, computer file formats,
Food preparation, mean duration for life- cycle groups by day of week, 139
Fraser’s temporal model, 192,193 Free time, see also Leisure; Leisure-time
budget research
data analysis issue, 41–42 201
processing and analysis of diary data, 53
73/75–76
26–27
ies,110–111Error sources, age-related, in time use stud-
EthnicityAnglo versus Italian in family support,
expression of attachment relations, 166 Ethnography, qualitative method of time
Ethology, holistic approach combining bio-
164–165
activity scheme for diverse aspects of, 52,
adult education, 53cultural events, 53
fitness and sports activity, 53
use studies, 4,178 53
logical and sociocultural factors, 194 difficulty estimating, 54
national effort, 7 hobbies, 53 Eurostat Time Use Project, renewed multi-
Event reporting home communication, 54 relation to state, 120 tracking activities, 112–113
alternative to time estimates and time di- aries, 62
stopping behavior and affect state at mo-
ment occurring, 121 Future directions tracking activities, 112 applications, 261–264
mass media, 53–54 versus nonfree time, 52/53 organizational activity, 53 social life, 53use of diary data, 51–54
Experience sampling method (ESM)
Frequency, data analysis issue, 36
context influencing activity patterns,
investigation of specific activities, 263 Family care time, use of diary data, 50-51Family leave, federal legislation in U.S.,
Family life cycle overview, 259-261
264
158 methodological issues, 265–267
Anglo versus Italian comparison, 164–
becoming a parent, 159–161 construction of time, 155–156 flexibility, 165–166 of behavior, 263
theoretical issues, 264–265 understanding needs and issues of
understanding psychological dimensions
165subpopulations, 262–263
274 Index
Galileo, legacy of, 215 Gender ties across, 234–236
Immigrant groups, comparing daily activi-
Impairment, chronic, study using proxy
Income, social status factor in activity par- ticipation model, 78,79
Independent source, validity of time dia- ries, 82
In-depth interviewing
impact on time use in disabled persons,
prominent variable in activity participa-177 data, 114–116
tion model, 77, 78
data for life cycle study, 135–136 GSS Time Use Module (1986) diary study
GSS Time Use Module (1992) diary study
General Social Survey (GSS)
in Canada, 69
in Canada, 69-70 and, 203–204
research on elders veys, 66
data collection method, 201–203 study example combining time use diary
Industrialization, evolution of time use sur-
Infertility, involuntarily childless, 162–163 Information technology, application to
time-budget methodology, 231,240 Institutionalized elderly, see also Elderly;
Time-budget research on elders
Gerontology, see also Elderly; Time-budget
interest in time use research, 8 time-budget methodologies for, 236–238
Global reciprocity, family relationships, 164-165
Halifax Metropolitan Survey (1971–1972),
Health search (IATUR), 8
therapeutic recreation, 249–250
diary study in Canada, 69
education interest in time use research, 8 relationships among time use and well-
History, development of time use studies,
History of ideas
International Association for Time Use Re-
Interviewing
being, 171–173 203
5–8 sign, 23–24
in-depth data collection method, 201–
personal versus telephone in diary de-
study example combining time use diary
data collection method, 205–208 providing important issues for consider-
research method to develop theory, 206 study of relationship between people’s
and, 203–204
ation, 207–208 Japan first time-budget study, 5 regular data collection regimen, 7
Japanese, comparing Korean with, and
Judeo-Christian tradition, perception of
occupations and health status, 206-207 Chinese elderly, 234–236
Hobbies, free time aspect, 53 Holistic research, see also Biological and time, 216
sociocultural perspectives
Holland, regular data collection regimen, 7 Home communication, free time aspect, 54 Household production, concern in devel-
Human behavior
importance of, 194,208 Kaizen principles, refinements in time-
Korea, regular data collection regimen, 7 Korean elderly, comparing to Japanese and
budget methodology, 238–240
oping countries, 11
analysis of trade-offs, 128 expectations with days of week, 134–135 speculations into, from time-diary
Chinese in Canada, 234–236
Labor, sexual division of, concern in devel- oped and developing countries, 11
Labor force analysis
method, 58–59 application of time use research, 9–10 measurement approach, 4
Laundry, doing, mean duration for life- Illness, chronic, see also Disabilities, life with reintegration of persons with, 169–170 cycle groups by day of week, 140
Index 275
Leisure Life cycle ( cont.)application of time use research, 12-13mean duration for life-cycle groups by
measurement approach for general stud-
value of time allocation data, 13 work status variable, 13
leisure grouping, 136 life-cycle groups, 136 limitations using single-item demo-
graphic variables, 130 day of week, 143
ies, 4 marital status, 131 mean duration of each activity by day of
presence of children, 131 results of analyses of variance comparing
groupings on selected activity cat- egories for each day of week, 150–
week, 137,139–140,142–144,147 Leisure-time budget research, see also Alz-
heimer's disease; Elderlyage and stage of life cycle as predictors
of time use, 248 application of time-budget methodology, 151
246–247 single parenthood, 131 changes in activity upon leaving or en-
tering stages of life span, 248–249 perspective on reallocation of time across
life span, 249 process of understanding leisure ability
in Alzheimer's patients, 252–255studies investigating effects of aging,
245–246 Location of activities, 71 therapeutic recreation, 249–251 turning points in activity involvement
Life, quality of, application of time use re-
Life cycle
social and functional significance of weekly rhythms, 149–150
weekly distribution of work for pay, 138
workday-weekend dichotomy, 145–146 Liking scores, analysis of activities, 120–121 Living standards, measurement of, concern
in developing countries, 11
Locational or geographical factors, in activ-
Locke, age of enlightenment, 215 Luckmann's temporal model, 192, 193
Mail-back sample data collection in 1985 time-use study, 84–85
Maori society, see also Aotearoa (New Zea-
ity participation model, 78/80 based on age, 247–248
search, 11–12
activity groupings, 136 amounts of discretionary time, 133 asymmetry land)
and asynchronization of daily life,
characterizing time allocation, 133 biological age, 131 combination of four factors, 130–133 conceptualization of life-cycle categories,
132 Io, Supreme god, 212–213 daily life as system of behavioral trade-
offs, 149 data analyses, 137–145
distribution
definition of time, 212
early contact with British, 217–218 Earth mother and Sky father, 213 effects of process of civilization, 219 first time period, the nothingness (Te
146–148
Kore), 212–213
Maori time, 227
period of enlightenment, broad daylight (Te Ao Marama), 213–214
second time period, the darkness (Te Po),213
signing declaration of dependence, 218 time promised and lost in treaty of
types of time, 214–215
impact on life cycle, 148 in late life, influence on social participa-
of discretionary (leisure) time, 142–145 of housework, errands, and child care,
of time to major daily activities, 135 employment status, 131 General Social Survey (GSS) data, 135–
impact of marital and employment sta-
138,141–142Waitangi, 218–219
Marital status 136
tus, 148 tion, 233
276 Index
Marital status ( cont.)life cycle, 130-131role factor in activity participation
young-adult children returning home af-
Multivariate analyses (cont.)social status indicators, 79
technology as factor, 80 model, 79 temporal factors, 79–80
ter divorce, 164 Mutual Broadcasting Corporation (1954),
U.S. study, 67 Mass media, free time aspect, 53–54 Meaning and outcomes Nationality or race, in activity participation
National time use studies, countries, 7 Newton, age of enlightenment, 215 New Zealand: see Aotearoa (New Zealand) Norway, regular data collection regimen, 7 Nursing, interest in time use research, 8 Nutrition, concern in developing countries,
direct measurement of subjective as-
episode analysis, 96-98sampling with analytic intent, 93-96triangulation, 101–1 03
model, 78 pects, 98–100
Media usage during activities, 73 Medical leave, federal legislation in U.S., 158 Medicine, interest in time use research, 8 Men, single versus employed fathers, dis-
tribution of housework, errands, and child care, 141
11
Occupation, social status factor in activity
Occupational therapy, interest in time use participation model, 78/79
research, 8 Microbehavioral approach, diary method, 62 Mondays, transition and readjustment day,
Mothers, working versus stay-at-home145–146 One-day diary approach, 63
On-site verification, alternative to time esti- mates and time diaries, 63
Organizational activity, free time aspect, 53 Outcomes and meaning: see Meaning and
asymmetry between, 146–147 daily life as system of behavioral trade-
distribution of housework, errands, and
understanding needs and issues of, 262 Multinational Time Budget Data Archive at
Multinational Time Use Study
offs, 149
child care, 138,141–142 outcomes
Pakeha culture, see also Aotearoa (New Zealand)
tity, 228 Essex University, 7 influence on unique New Zealand iden-
ambitious, landmark study of time, 66–
importance of sociodemographic charac-
landmark in cross-national survey re-
open-interval approach, 22 data, 51
Parenthood67 Canadian birth statistics, 159-161
teristics, 25 model, 79
search, 6
role factor in activity participation
Participation, data analysis issue, 32–36 Personal care and travel time, use of diary
Personal interview versus telephone in di-Multiple classification analysis (MCA), multivariate analysis technique, 76–77 Personality state
ary design, 23–24
Multivariate analyses birth factors, 77–78 gender variable, 77 larger model, 77–80 locational or geographic factors, 80 multiple classification analysis (MCA)
technique, 76–77 search, 8 nationality or race, 78
role factors, 78/79 search, 8
distinction from trait, 119 positive and negative affects, 119–120
Personality trait, 119 Personal sample, data collection in 1985
time-use study, 85–86 Physical education, interest in time use re-
Political science, interest in time use re-
Index 277
Population, primary descriptive measure,
Positivism, influencing quantitative re-
Principle " the more, the more" of time allo-
Psychology
Saturdays and Sundays, behavioral pat-
Secondary activities during activities, 72 28–29 terns, 145
search approach, 195–197 Sequence analysis
cation, 64
data analysis issue, 40–41 integrating activity setting concept, 41
Sexual activity, specialized survey of, 54–55 Sexual division of labor, concern in devel-
oped and developing countries, 11 Shadow technique
alternative to time estimates and time di-
testing validity of time diaries, 83
concern in developed countries, 11 measurement approach, 4
dimensions of behavior, applications of
interest in time use research, 8 relationship of well-being to time use,
state during activities, 73
time use research, 263
117–122 aries, 62
Shopping behavior Qualitative research paradigm, biological
and sociocultural perspectives, 195,197
Quality of life, see also Psychology; Time- budget research on elders
application of time use research, 11–12 in disabled elderly persons, 176 ideal result of improved methods, 122–123 indicators of quality time, 116–1 17
Quantitative research paradigm, biological
Single parenthood, life cycle, 131 Sleep, mean duration for life-cycle groups
Social, political and health planners, useful by day of week, 142
information by integrating re- search approaches, 198–200
Social change, application of time use re-search, 10–1 1
Social life, free time aspect, 53 Social partners, during activities, 71–72 Social status factors, in activity participa-
Social time
and sociocultural perspectives, 195-197
Quasi-observer, validity of time diaries, 82
Race, in activity participation model, 78 Random-hour technique, alternative to
Readership surveys, measurement ap-
Recreation, interest in time use research, 8 Reliability of time diaries, 81 Respondent summary file, processing and
analysis of diary data, 26 Retired persons, leisure based on work sta-
tus, 13 Role factors in activity participation model,
78,79 use research, 8 Russia (Soviet Union)
tion model, 78,79
expectations for behaviors and attitudes with days of week, 134–135
human behavior along weekly lines, 133– time estimates and time diaries, 63
proach, 4 134 Sociocultural perspectives: see Aotearoa
(New Zealand); Biological and sociocultural perspectives; English colonists; Maori society
Socioeconomic status, impact on time use in disabled persons, 177–178
Sociology/anthropology, interest in time
Soviet Union (Russia) earliest sophisticated time use study, 5 time budget surveys, 6
earliest sophisticated time use study, 5 time budget surveys, 6
Sports activity and fitness, free time aspect,
Statistics Canada, data collection for Can-
Stepfamilies, becoming parents, 163 Stratification analysis, time-budget data,
Sampling, see also Collection guidelines 53analytic intent, 93–96 sampling respondents, 20–21 ada, 6,7 size considerations, 21 size issue for time use research of dis-
abled persons, 179 128
278 Index
Students, leisure based on work status, 13 Time, see also Family life cycle; Time mea-
balancing, work and family, 158–159 changes in becoming a parent, 159–161 measuring how people spend, 59–66 perception and meaning across cultures,
zero-sum property of, 59,84Time allocation, see also Life cycle
persons with disabilities, 170–171 "the more, the more" principle, 64
Time and technology, concern in devel-
Time-budget methodology, see also Geron-
application of information technology,
application of kaizen principles, 238–240 costly and time-consuming, 232 daily activity patterns for caregivers and
for development of social environments for well-being of elderly, 237–238
differentiating between satisfying and
for gerontology, 236–238plethora of data for analysis, 232 reasons for under-utilization of, 232recent studies employing, 233–236recording multiple activities, 232,240–
Subjective data, dimensions in diary con-tent, 24–25
Subordinate, level of abstraction for time-budget analyses, 116
Superordinate, level of abstraction for
time-budget analyses, 116 265Survey Research Center, University of
Maryland (1985) study, see also United States time-use projects
surement
modes of diary collection, 68–69 national 1985 study, 84–86 unlike 1965 and 1975 studies, 68 oped countries, 11
Survey Research Center, University of Michigan, see also United States tologytime-use projects
U.S. study (1965), 67–68 231,240 US. study (1975), 68
Te Ao Marama, broad daylight, period of
Technologyenlightenment, 213-214 care recipients, 238–240
factor in activity participation model, 80 impact of, concern in developing coun-
Te Kore, nothingness, Maoris first time pe-
Telephone coincidental studies, alternative to
Telephone interview
tries, 11 non-satisfying activities, 237
riod, 212–213
time estimates and time diaries, 63
data from persons with disabilities, 180-
versus personal in diary design, 23–24 Telephone sample, data collection in 1985
Television Time-budget research
241181 refinements in, 238–240
surveys at regular specified intervals,
time-budget diaries, 236–237
advantages as social indicator, 128classification toward life cycle study, 129 daily activity classification concerns, 129literature review, 128–129 types of analyses, 128–129
Time-budget research on elders activity analysis by liking scores, 120–121 activity classification (coding) biases,
early research, 107–108 ESM (experience sampling method), 112 ESM for relating behavior and affect, 121
forms for studying time use, 108–109 ideal result of improved methods, 122–123
241time-use study, 85
changes on arrival of, 59 mean duration for life-cycle groups by
Temporal factors in activity participation
Temporal location, definition of, 37 Te Po, darkness, second Maori period of
day of week, 144
model, 79-80
time, 213 Tesserae 116–1 17
activity and state, 121,122
" the more, the more" principle of time allo-
Therapeutic recreation event reporting, 112–113 cation, 64
definition of, 250 leisure-time budget research, 249–250
Index 279
Time-budget research on elders (cont.) Time-diary data ( cont.)omitting population that most needs as-
personality state affect and activities,
potential related sources of error, 110–
psychological well-being versus time
refusal rates for all ages, 11 1 significance of objective event versus sig-
nificance to individual, 118 state affect and activities, 119-122study of chronic impairment using proxy
subject-selection biases, 11 1–113 65 techniques for inclusion of subjective
media usage, 73
preparation and organization for analy-
psychological states during activities, 73
social partners during activities, 71–72
technique of multiple classification anal-
variable fixed versus fixed field file for-
sistance, 112 multivariate analyses, 76–77
119–122 sis, 25–26
111 secondary activities, 72
use, 117–119 yses (MCA), 76–77
mats, 74
activity coding, 70-71avoiding pitfaIls of estimate approach,
basic types of time, 58 example of, 56-57features of, 54–59,64–66 limitations of reporting frame, 54–55 measurement logic of Multinational
Time Budget Study, 64 measuring long-term societal changes,
respondents’ own words, 54 sample of completed time diary, 56,57 speculations about nature of human be-
structure and portrait, 49 Time-diary studies
in Canada, 69–70 industrialization in late 19 century, 66 Multinational Time Use Study, 66–67 previous studies, 66–69 US. studies, 67–69 in Western countries, 67
data analysis issue, 36–37 primary descriptive measure, 28–29
Time-diary method, see also Diary data
data, 114–116
states and linking to accompany-ing activity, 121–122
time diary, 108–109 time diary or yesterday interview by
yesterday interview, 108–109 proxy, 113
Time deepening, 72 55,58 Time diaries
activity data collection, 19–20 collecting time use data, 178–179 comprehensive data collection, 4–5
form for studying time use, 108–109 methodological properties of, 81–83
microbehavioral technique, 83–84 by proxy, 113
reliability of, 81 study example combining in-depth inter-
validity and reliability for persons with
validity of, 81–83
analysis procedures, 71–77 blending of activities, 72 computer file formats, 73–76 data file editing, 25–26 day and time of day, 72 dependence on attendant background 64–66
environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) ex-
example of time-of-day differences, 72 file creation, 26–27 location of activities, 71
havior, 58-59
viewing and, 203–204
disabilities, 181 Time (duration)
Time-diary data, see also Time use data
Time famine, 72 Time measurement
alternatives to time estimates and time
features of time diary and sample diary,
problems with time estimates, 60–62 Time-of-day differences in activity, 72 Time-of-year sampling issue for data col-
Time-points file, processing and analysis of
diaries, 62–64
data, 25
posure, 73 lection, 21
diary data, 26–27
280 Index
Time use Time use research ( cont.)age and stage of life cycle as predictors, 248
relationships among time use, health, and well-being, 171–173
Time-diary data
need to understand human time use,
persons with disabilities, 170–171 problem areas needing to be addressed,
sampling with analytic intent, 93–96
studying meaning and outcomes, 93–103
study of production, progress, and qual-
ity of life, 259
theoretical issues, 264–265
triangulation, 101–1 03
understanding needs and issues of sub-
psychological aspects of, 117–122 259–260
Time use data, see also Analysis issues; 261
analysis issues, 27–42
analytical approach, 93–103
applications of, 8–14
behavioral and subjective indicators, 12
collection guidelines, 20–25
data-file editing and creation, 25–27
descriptive patterns and meaning indica- populations, 262–263
discovery and development of new ana- of behavior, 263
economic accounts, 9 formations, 260 importance of capturing contextual data,
labor force analysis, 9–10 leisure, 12–13
obstacles to accurate responses, 60–62 quality of life, 11–12
social change, 10–11
social indicators, 11–12
travel behavior research, 13–14
women's concerns, 11
tors, 92–93 understanding psychological dimensions
lytical approaches, 266 world societies undergoing radical trans-
Time use studies, see also United States
266 time-use projects
historical development of, 5–8
providing critical information, 8
behavior research application, 13–14
concern in developed countries, 11
measurement approach, 4 use of diary data, 51
Travel studies
Trend analyses, time-budget data, 128
Triangulation, optimizing understanding of Time Use Questionnaire for persons with
Time use research, see also Disabilities, life
activity coding and classification issues,
advances in methodology, 7–8 162 applications of, 261–264 challenge of showing usefulness in guid- 166
context influencing activity patterns, 264
definition of, 3–5
descriptive patterns and indicators of
direct measurement of subjective as-
episode analysis, 96-98 ies, 87-88investigation of specific activities, 263
methodological considerations for per-
methodological issues, 265–267
Multinational Time Use Study, landmark
disabilities, 180,182
with; Future directions Unemployment
264–265
meaning and outcomes, 101-103
response of older workers, 162 responses by middle-aged workers, 161–
social support of family and friends, 165–
United Kingdom, first time use studies, 5-6United States
ing policy, 261
early time use studies, 5
major national studies by Institute of So-meaning, 92–93
pects, 98–100
cial Research (ISR), 6
United States time-use projects comparison of 1965,1975, and 1985 stud-
mail-back sample for 1985 study, 84–85
personal sample for 1985 study, 85–86 1965 study, 86–87 1975 study, 86
1985 study, 84–86
telephone sample for 1985 study, 85
sons with disabilities, 178–183
study, 6
Index 281
Unpaid work, concern in developing coun-
Unwed mothers, young-adult children re-
Urban planning, interest in time use re-
Work, see also Unemploymenttries, 11
turning home, 164 model, 79
search, 8
and family balancing time, 158–159
role factor in activity participation
study of relationship between people’s oc-
cupations and health status, 206–207
Work, unpaid, concern in developing coun-
tries, 11
Work activities, mean duration for life-cyclegroups by day of week, 137,147
Workforce analysis, application of time use
Work time, use of diary data, 48–50
Validity of time diaries, 81–83
Variable field format, computer file for- mats, 73–75
Well-being research, 9–10
and well-being, 171–173 World societies
265
stay-at-home
relationships among time use, health,
use of time budget data measuring,
Women, see also Mothers, working versus
overall use of time, 260
radical transformations in structures and
behaviors, 260
application of time use research, 11
daily life as system of behavioral trade-
understanding needs and issues of, 262-
Yesterday interview
form for studying time use, 108–109
multi-item state rating scale, 122
problems with proxy responses, 114
offs, 149
263 by proxy, 113