Income Inequality and American Business Slides.ppt...Household inequality from 40,000 feet CPS Gini...

23
Income inequality and American business Christopher Jencks Harvard Kennedy School HBS Discussion on 2/13/2014

Transcript of Income Inequality and American Business Slides.ppt...Household inequality from 40,000 feet CPS Gini...

Page 1: Income Inequality and American Business Slides.ppt...Household inequality from 40,000 feet CPS Gini coefficients for US households' pretax money income: 1967 to 2012 Gini = (0.0015)x(Year)

Income inequality and American business

Christopher JencksHarvard Kennedy School

HBS Discussion on 2/13/2014

Page 2: Income Inequality and American Business Slides.ppt...Household inequality from 40,000 feet CPS Gini coefficients for US households' pretax money income: 1967 to 2012 Gini = (0.0015)x(Year)

2Sources: Economic Report of the President, 2013; Census Bureau, Current Population Reports, P-60,-245, Table A-2.

Growth of median household income and per capita personal income: 1969 to 2012 (1969 = 100)

104111

121 120110

128

159

189

223 223

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

240

1969 1979 1989 1999 2009

2007 2012

Adjusting for inflation, mean personal income per capita more than doubled between 1967 and 2007, while median family income rose 20%

Page 3: Income Inequality and American Business Slides.ppt...Household inequality from 40,000 feet CPS Gini coefficients for US households' pretax money income: 1967 to 2012 Gini = (0.0015)x(Year)

3

Median income was lower in 2012 than in 1989

$48,520 $51,681 $56,080 $55,627$46,449

$51,071

$0

$20,000

$40,000

$60,000

$80,000

$100,000

1969 1979 1989 1999 2009

Median income at business cycle peaks:1969 to 2007

Annual increase: 1969-2007 = 0.48% 1969-2012 = 0.22%

(in 2012 CPI-U=RS dollars)

(2012)

Page 4: Income Inequality and American Business Slides.ppt...Household inequality from 40,000 feet CPS Gini coefficients for US households' pretax money income: 1967 to 2012 Gini = (0.0015)x(Year)

4

Is our problem inequality or poverty? Lately, both.Two measures of bottom quintile's mean income: Purchasing power and ratio to population mean

(both shown as percent of 1967 level)

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

1967 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012

1967

= 1

00

142

119108

80

1974-76

Purchasing power(1967 = 100)

Ratio to overall mean(1967 = 100)

1999

1967 mean = $9,419. Share of total personal income = 4.0%. Source: CPS, Series P-60-167, Table B-2 .

Page 5: Income Inequality and American Business Slides.ppt...Household inequality from 40,000 feet CPS Gini coefficients for US households' pretax money income: 1967 to 2012 Gini = (0.0015)x(Year)

5

Household income is more unequalthan hourly wages

90/50 ratio 50/10 ratio

1973

All households 2.08 2.85

M&F Wages 1.91 1.91

2007

All households 2.49 3.43

M&F Wages 2.33 1.94

Wage data from Economic Policy Institute

Page 6: Income Inequality and American Business Slides.ppt...Household inequality from 40,000 feet CPS Gini coefficients for US households' pretax money income: 1967 to 2012 Gini = (0.0015)x(Year)

Household inequality from 40,000 feetCPS Gini coefficients for US households'

pretax money income: 1967 to 2012

Gini = (0.0015)x(Year) - 2.6241r = 0.979

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

1967 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012

Gin

i coe

ffici

ent

0.4160.477

Measurement changes

Published for 1967-92

Adjusted to match post-1993 series* Published for 1993-2012

* Neither CBO nor IRS data suggest that inequality rose between 1992 and 1993, so the 4.8% increase in the CPS Gini between 1992 and 1993 is probably all spurious. The adjusted estimates inflated all pe-1993 Ginis by 4.8%.

Page 7: Income Inequality and American Business Slides.ppt...Household inequality from 40,000 feet CPS Gini coefficients for US households' pretax money income: 1967 to 2012 Gini = (0.0015)x(Year)

Trend in 90/50 ratio: Rising skill premiums?

90/50 income ratios for households, by age: 1967 to 2012

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

3.0

1967 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012

Rat

io

90/50 ratio:Age 18 and over

90/50 ratio:Children under 18

2.682.54

2.06

1.89

Measurement changes

Ratios are based on percentiles of total household income, adjusted for household size by dividing total household income by tgher square root of household size. Household income is converted into 2012 dollars using the Implicit Price Deflator for Personal Consumption Expenditure from the National Income and Product Accounts. Source: Tabulations by Anny Fenton using the March Current Population Survey. File=Fenton CPS ratios with Jan 2014 AF edits (65+ head of HH incl) 011014 FINAL.

Page 8: Income Inequality and American Business Slides.ppt...Household inequality from 40,000 feet CPS Gini coefficients for US households' pretax money income: 1967 to 2012 Gini = (0.0015)x(Year)

50/10 ratio: Less marriage? Lower male wages?50/10 household income ratios for individuals, by age: 1967 to 2012

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

1967 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012

Rat

io

Children under 18

Adults 18 and over

3.44

4.11

2.93

2.66

Measurement changes

4.38

3.26

Ratios are based on percentiles of total household income. Incomes are adjusted for household size by dividing total household income by tgher square root of household size. Household income is converted into 2012 dollars using the Implicit Price Deflator for Personal Consumption Expenditure from the National Income and Product Accounts. Source: Tabulations by Anny Fenton using the March Current Population Survey.

Page 9: Income Inequality and American Business Slides.ppt...Household inequality from 40,000 feet CPS Gini coefficients for US households' pretax money income: 1967 to 2012 Gini = (0.0015)x(Year)

9

The return of the super-rich: Globalization? Computers? Tax cuts? Deregulation? Insider trading? A culture of risk-taking? And greed??

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Rat

io to

mea

n fo

r all

hous

ehol

ds

Top 0.1 percent

Next 0.9 percent

Source: Paris Top Incomes Database. Paris detailed percentiles for US (HBS Fig 3)

12.76.5

11.7

Ratio of pretax personal income means within the top one percent to the mean for all households, excluding capital gains: 1923-2012

55

19

1973

8882

19282012

Page 10: Income Inequality and American Business Slides.ppt...Household inequality from 40,000 feet CPS Gini coefficients for US households' pretax money income: 1967 to 2012 Gini = (0.0015)x(Year)

10

5

5

5

3

21

17

14

8

7

6

27Spain

Italy

France

Great Britain

Germany

Sweden

Australia

United States

Norway

Canada

Netherlands

Ratio of those who agree or agree strongly to those who disagree or disagree strongly that "income differences in this country are too large."

How do ordinary citizens feel about all this?

Page 11: Income Inequality and American Business Slides.ppt...Household inequality from 40,000 feet CPS Gini coefficients for US households' pretax money income: 1967 to 2012 Gini = (0.0015)x(Year)

11

Market Gini

Disposable Gini

Percent reduction

Sweden 2000 0.375 0.238 36.5Finland 2000 0.352 0.233 33.8Denmark 1997 0.345 0.237 31.3Norway 2000 0.337 0.236 30.0Germany 2000 0.360 0.254 29.4Australia 1994 0.396 0.293 26.0Great Britain 1999 0.450 0.341 24.2Canada 2000 0.380 0.300 21.1United States 2000 0.436 0.363 16.7Switzerland 1992 0.332 0.297 10.5

MEAN 0.376 0.290 23.0

How have legislators responded? Reduction in market income inequality among working-age households due to taxes and transfers in ten rich democracies

Source: Kenworthy and Pontusson (2006)

Page 12: Income Inequality and American Business Slides.ppt...Household inequality from 40,000 feet CPS Gini coefficients for US households' pretax money income: 1967 to 2012 Gini = (0.0015)x(Year)

12

Effects of rising inequality in rich democracies

Economic growthShort-term: small but positive. Long-term: unclear

EmploymentHaven’t found (or done) any research

Life expectancySmall but negative cross-nationally in LISEffects limited to infants and males 35-59?

Page 13: Income Inequality and American Business Slides.ppt...Household inequality from 40,000 feet CPS Gini coefficients for US households' pretax money income: 1967 to 2012 Gini = (0.0015)x(Year)

13

Effects of rising inequality in rich democracies

Disparities in children’s economic prospects.

Strong theoretical reasons to expect less mobility when parents resources are more unequal.

But no good evidence of such effects so far.

Maybe too soon to say.

Page 14: Income Inequality and American Business Slides.ppt...Household inequality from 40,000 feet CPS Gini coefficients for US households' pretax money income: 1967 to 2012 Gini = (0.0015)x(Year)

14

Effects of rising inequality in rich democracies

Disparities in children’s test scoresWider in more unequal countries, but effect

of within-country changes is unclear.Widened a lot in US for post-1980 cohorts.

Mostly due to rising absolute effect of parental income, not to change in parental income dispersion.

Macro versus micro effects of inequality

Page 15: Income Inequality and American Business Slides.ppt...Household inequality from 40,000 feet CPS Gini coefficients for US households' pretax money income: 1967 to 2012 Gini = (0.0015)x(Year)

15

Effects of rising inequality in rich democracies

Disparities in political influenceMeltzer-Richard theorem predicts that demand for

redistributive government spending will rise as the fraction of voters with incomes below the mean rises, but

1. Rising inequality allows the very rich to exert more influence on the political views of the less affluent (Fox News) and politicians (K Street).

2. Rising inequality may lower turnout more among the less affluent. Passivity, vote suppression, disenfranchisement of felons, no path to citizenship.

Page 16: Income Inequality and American Business Slides.ppt...Household inequality from 40,000 feet CPS Gini coefficients for US households' pretax money income: 1967 to 2012 Gini = (0.0015)x(Year)

16

Political effects of high inequality in the past

If there are men in this country big enough to own the government of the United States, they are going to own it.

Woodrow Wilson (1913:286)

We must make our choice. We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we cannot have both.

Louis Brandeis, quoted in Dillard (1941)

Page 17: Income Inequality and American Business Slides.ppt...Household inequality from 40,000 feet CPS Gini coefficients for US households' pretax money income: 1967 to 2012 Gini = (0.0015)x(Year)

17

An agenda for the private sector

1. It is unreasonable to expect most businesses not to pursue profits or to give away a larger share of profits than the law or the market requires to either workers or good causes.

2. However, a democratic government’s job is not to maximize business profits but to protect the public interest. That inevitably means making rules that limit what business can do by regulating wages, hours, safety, labor unions, and other business practices.

Page 18: Income Inequality and American Business Slides.ppt...Household inequality from 40,000 feet CPS Gini coefficients for US households' pretax money income: 1967 to 2012 Gini = (0.0015)x(Year)

18

An agenda for the private sector3. If business does not like being seen as a predatory

enterprise, it needs to accept such rules as a legitimate feature of democracy.

4. It also needs to refrain from trying to undermine or change such rules covertly.

5. Business should not be expected to do good, but it should be expected to abide by both the law and community norms, and to do no harm.

6. A good rule of thumb is that business should not be doing anything that it wants or needs to hide from public view or from public officials.

Page 19: Income Inequality and American Business Slides.ppt...Household inequality from 40,000 feet CPS Gini coefficients for US households' pretax money income: 1967 to 2012 Gini = (0.0015)x(Year)

19

The End

Page 20: Income Inequality and American Business Slides.ppt...Household inequality from 40,000 feet CPS Gini coefficients for US households' pretax money income: 1967 to 2012 Gini = (0.0015)x(Year)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

1913 1923 1933 1943 1953 1963 1973 1983 1993 2003 2013

Perc

ent o

f per

sona

l inc

ome

Top 1%

19.6%

8.2%

1928

Top 0.1%

19.3%

8.8%

1964

2.0%

8.0%

1986

2.9%

9.1%

Pretax income shares of top 1% and 0.1%, excluding capital gains: 1913-2012

The 100 year overview

Page 21: Income Inequality and American Business Slides.ppt...Household inequality from 40,000 feet CPS Gini coefficients for US households' pretax money income: 1967 to 2012 Gini = (0.0015)x(Year)

21

Percent of pretax income going to families in the top decile, excluding capital gains: United States, 1923-2012

1

11

21

31

41

51

61

71

81

91

1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Rat

io to

mea

n ho

useh

old

inco

me

Top 0.1 percent

99th to 99.9th

95th to 99th90th to 95th

Source: Paris Top Incomes Database. Paris detailed percentiles for US (HBS Fig 3)

The return of the super-rich: Globalization? Computers? Tax Cuts? Deregulation? Cultural Change?

Page 22: Income Inequality and American Business Slides.ppt...Household inequality from 40,000 feet CPS Gini coefficients for US households' pretax money income: 1967 to 2012 Gini = (0.0015)x(Year)

The 50 year overview: The top 1% is different

Income shares of top 1%, next 4%, and next 5% of US families:,before taxes and excluding capital gains: 1960 to 2012

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

1962 1967 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012

Perc

ent o

f tot

al p

erso

nal i

ncom

e

8.3%

Top 1%

Next 4%

Next 5%

12.7%

11.1%

9.1%

13.5%

12.0%

19.3%

16.4%

12.4%

1986

2012 share

1962 share

1986 share

Page 23: Income Inequality and American Business Slides.ppt...Household inequality from 40,000 feet CPS Gini coefficients for US households' pretax money income: 1967 to 2012 Gini = (0.0015)x(Year)

Wages are not as unequal as household incomes

1.00

1.25

1.50

1.75

2.00

2.25

2.50

1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007

Ratio of estimated hourly wages at the 90th, 50th, and 10th percentilesof the combined US distribution for men and women: 1973 to 2007

1.91

2.33

1.9450/10 ratio

90/50 ratio

1.91

2.07

2.03