In vivo imaging of enamel by reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM): non-invasive analysis of dental...
Transcript of In vivo imaging of enamel by reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM): non-invasive analysis of dental...
SHORT COMMUNICATION
In vivo imaging of enamel by reflectance confocal microscopy(RCM): non-invasive analysis of dental surface
Maria Contaldo • Rosario Serpico • Alberta Lucchese
Received: 10 December 2012 / Accepted: 16 March 2013
� The Society of The Nippon Dental University 2013
Abstract The aim is to establish the feasibility to image
in vivo microscopic dental surface by non-invasive, real-
time, en face Reflectance Confocal Microscopy (RCM).
Fifteen healthy volunteers referred at the Multidisciplinary
Department of Medical-Surgical and Odontostomatological
Specialties, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy,
were enrolled. A commercially available hand-held RCM
(Vivascope�3000, Lucid, Rochester, NY, USA) was used to
image in vivo the dental surface of the upper right and left
central incisors of each volunteer. Totally, thirty vestibular
surfaces of upper central incisors were imaged in vivo by
RCM to preliminary image the dental surface and assess the
feasibility of a more extended study on teeth. In vivo RCM
was able to image the dental surface within the enamel, at a
maximum depth imaging of 300 lm, with images good in
quality and the capability to detect enamel structures such as
enamel lamellae and enamel damages, such as unevenness
and cracks. In conclusion, enamel ‘‘optical biopsy’’, gained
by RCM imaging, revealed to be a non-invasive real-time
tool valid to obtain architectural details of the dental surface
with no need for extraction or processing the samples. RCM
appears to be an optimum auxiliary device for investigating
the architectural pattern of superficial enamel, therefore
inviting further experiments aimed to define our knowledge
about damages after etching treatments or bracket removal
and the responsiveness to fluoride seals and the morphology
of the tooth/restoration interface. Moreover, this device
could also be used to detect relevant diseases like caries, or
to assess surface properties to evaluate lesion activity.
Keywords In vivo dental imaging � Enamel structure �Reflectance confocal microscopy � In vivo RCM � Dental
surface
Introduction
To date, microscopic dental examination requires ex vivo
elaborate techniques. Extracted teeth need to be decalci-
fied, processed and cut in thin slices to be available for
microscopic analysis [1]. These procedures are time and
money consuming, considering time and costs spent to
complete the procession of the sample. Therefore, alter-
native techniques could expand these limitations and avoid
the need for extraction and histopathological processes.
The literature reports several alternative imaging approa-
ches to dental analysis, such as scanning electron micros-
copy (SEM) [2] and optical coherence tomography (OCT)
[3]. However, these techniques still require to extract and
assess the tooth for its analysis.
Confocal microscopy (CM) is a microscopic imaging
technique that allows to avoid the sample preparation due
to its ability to optically scan on horizontal planes, layer by
layer, both specimen and living tissues along their depth
[4]. The result is a 2-dimensional image of a horizontal
virtual section of the tissue, which displays architecture and
cellular details of the section at microscopic resolution.
CM has been applied by several authors to study oral-
maxillary structures both in vivo and ex vivo [5]. Authors
such as Watson et al. [6] and Burmeister et al. [7] pre-
liminarily investigated the in vivo confocal microscopy
application on dental surface imaging, while such authors
as Ogaard et al. [8] and Lucchese et al. [1] reported their
experiences in describing teeth structures and compounds
by ex vivo confocal microscopy.
M. Contaldo (&) � R. Serpico � A. Lucchese
Multidisciplinary Department of Medical-Surgical and
Odontostomatological Specialties, Second University of Naples,
Via Luigi De Crecchio 6, 80138 Naples, Italy
e-mail: [email protected]
123
Odontology
DOI 10.1007/s10266-013-0110-9
In detail, the so-called ‘‘in vivo reflectance confocal
microscopy’’ (RCM) is based on the mechanism of back-
scattering of light. The refracted light is emitted by a
substance in the living tissue after an incident light at a
specific wavelength hits it. At present, in vivo RCM is
widely used in dermatology for in vivo microscopic
imaging of the skin in the clinical practice as diagnostic
and follow-up adjunct [9], and recent works have shown its
usefulness in oral mucosa imaging too [10].
Aim of the present study is to evaluate the feasibility to
image microscopic architecture of dental surface using an
in vivo RCM commercially available for skin imaging,
which revealed its usefulness in imaging oral mucosae in a
non-invasive, painless, real-time way [10].
Subjects, materials and methods
Subjects
Fifteen healthy volunteers (8 males, 7 females, mean age
38.4 ± 16.2 years) enrolled at the Multidisciplinary
Department of Medical-Surgical and Odontostomatological
Specialties, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy,
after signed consent, were subjected to in vivo RCM
examination of their upper central incisors vestibular sur-
faces (permanent teeth) to establish the usefulness of
in vivo RCM to image the dental structures. Totally, 30
upper central incisors were imaged, and classified at clin-
ically inspection as healthy teeth (26) and teeth with
cracked enamel surfaces (4). No teeth were successively
extracted.
In vivo reflectance confocal microscope
A commercially available hand-held RCM (Viva-
scope3000�, first version, Lucid, Rochester, NY, USA)
was applied [10]. The system operates with a diode laser
class 3A (European version) at 830 nm wavelength and
with a 309 water immersion objective lens with a
numerical aperture of 0.9. The laser power can vary in the
range of 5–10 mW according to the layer to evaluate and it
causes neither tissue damage nor dental heating. In order to
obtain confocal images of the tissue from the plans parallel
to the RCM lens (confocality), the device needs to work in
close contact to the dental surface. Ultrasound gel is
interposed between the lens and the window, and the
window and the mucosa, to optimize the incident and the
refracted lights transmission. Images are displayed in
500 9 500 lm horizontal sections, 5 lm in thickness and
with 0.5–1 lm lateral resolution. These parameters are
similar to standard histology; thus, offering the advantage
to visualize the cellular details [11].
RCM acquisition method
En face, single, 500 lm 9 500 lm RCM vertical stacked
images were collected starting from the top and progress-
ing deeper until reaching the last visible dental structures.
The microscopic parameters identified by RCM were cor-
related with the equivalent ones reported ex vivo in liter-
ature. These parameters are similar to standard histology;
thus, offering the advantage to visualize the microscopic
details. Because of its rigid probe, currently the device is
not allowed to reach the posterior and lingual regions of the
teeth. For these reasons, access is limited to the vestibular
surface of central incisors.
Results
Healthy dental surface
The optical horizontal sections of the dental surface were
easily observed by RCM. The RCM images of healthy
enamel showed a not perfectly smooth surface: it was
possible to observe furrows and unevenness of variable
depth and width with smoothed edges along with areas of
smoother enamel (Fig. 1a).
Starting from 10 lm underneath the surface and going
deeper toward the dentoenamel junction, the peculiar
structure of the enamel appeared: densely packed enamel
rods were embedded in interprismatic enamel. In detail,
strongly bright roundish areas, regular in size and geo-
metrically disposed, corresponded to the interprismatic
substance, highly refractive; these refractive areas con-
toured the enamel prisms, deductively recognized as very
dark and well-defined geometric circles (diameter less than
1 lm) regularly disposed and limited by the interprismatic
substance (Fig. 1b). Going deeper, the regular architecture
was preserved and the images remained good in quality and
contrast. 280 lm underneath the surface, some strongly
dark linear figures were identifiable, parallel to the hori-
zontal plane and interrupting the geometric enamel struc-
ture. They were related to the enamel lamellae, the
microscopic separations in the enamel which extend
inward from the enamel surface for varying distances and
which are filled with organic material (Fig. 1c). The den-
tin-enamel junction was not imaged. The maximum depth
reached was about 300 lm.
Cracked enamel surface
When the cracked enamel surface was imaged, among the
regular prismatic and interprismatic structures previously
described for healthy teeth, a quite pronounced fracture
was clearly identifiable because of the presence of a dark
Odontology
123
cleft irregular in shape, limited by pale bright walls,
brighter in some points (Fig. 1d). In 3 out 4 cases, the
fracture was visible until the last frame captured, 300 lm
underneath the surface.
Discussion
The microscopic study of dental structure and defects is
actually based on ex vivo techniques, which require the
tooth needs to be extracted and processed by long and
intricate procedures.
In vivo confocal microscopy is a non-invasive imaging
technique, which allows to obtain microscopic details of
the living tissues in real time, with no need for biopsy or
anesthetics [12]. In vivo RCM, based on the mechanism of
backscattering of light, is largely used in dermatology as
adjunct tool for the clinical management and therapeutic
monitoring of patients affected by melanocytic and non-
melanocytic skin tumors and inflammatory skin diseases
and it represents both an alternative to conventional his-
topathological examination and a tool able to orient clini-
cian and surgeon towards the most representative sites to
biopsy [13]. In vivo RCM has been also applied in
Fig. 1 a Dental surface, not perfectly smooth but with furrows and
unevenness of variable depth and width. b Enamel structure, regular
interprismatic substance (bright polygonal areas) and enamel prisms
(dark areas among the interprismatic substance). c Enamel lamellae,
280 lm underneath the surface, appeared as strongly dark linearfigures parallel to the horizontal plane and interrupting the geometric
enamel structure. d Cracked enamel was identified as a dark irregular
cleft, limited by bright boundaries. Scale bar 100 lm
Odontology
123
stomatology to image the healthy oral mucosa, thus pro-
viding a comprehensive description of the confocal criteria
visible in healthy mucosa [10].
Thanks to the preliminary works exposed by Watson [6],
for the first time it was possible to image in vivo at micro-
scopical resolution, on en face optical sections, the teeth and
the oral mucosa, with neither anesthetic injection nor pain
for the volunteer. The deep enamel structure was easily
observed and distinguished from the resin composite resto-
rations and the presence of voids which were not at all
clinically obvious on the surface of the restoration was also
imaged. The lamellae in the enamel were visible as well as
enamel prisms and possibly dental plaque. Watson intuited
the versatility and the benefits of using this kind of device to
study clinical conditions. The importance of this pioneer
work is indisputable; however, in Watson’s work the exact
depth of view could not be recorded and the pictures were not
well-defined in contrast and in details resolutions. Thanks to
the engineering and software developments occurred during
the last two decades, RCM devices commercially available
now allow to standardize the operative protocol and to
improve quality of contrast and magnification.
In the present work, we performed in vivo teeth surface
microscopic imaging in a non-invasive real-time approach
using RCM to test its clinical potential in superficial teeth
imaging.
The examinations were performed without trauma or
damage for the subjects enrolled. The subjects well toler-
ated the short time spent to perform the imaging (mean
time 5 min) and the non-invasive, relatively simple
procedure.
In addition, RCM does not need stain injection, neither
rinse solution nor topic substance application, except the
gel used for allowing a good light transmission from and to
the microscope, since it is based on the intrinsic, refractile
proprieties of the subcellular structures and molecules.
Based on this property, RCM can be used without risk of
allergic/irritant reactions to stains and/or postoperative
complications, and as it is an ionizing radiation-free device,
it can be used in safety in children and pregnant.
Despite the ex vivo approach, the in vivo RCM imaging
allows to analyze the dental surface without processing the
tooth in a clinical condition close to the real contest of the
tooth, thus avoiding to image iatrogenic enamel scratches
such as the ones that may occur after extraction, and with
the real hydration state of the tooth in its natural
environment.
Our results demonstrated high correspondence between
in vivo RCM and ex vivo CM images collected by other
authors [8].
The device used in the present study has been able to
observe several enamel layers well in quality and contrast,
until 300 lm underneath the surface in real time with no
need to extract the teeth. Since the thickness of the enamel
is between 1.5 and 2.5 mm but the maximum depth
reached by RCM is 300 lm, the sole dental structure
imaged by RCM may be the enamel, while dentin-enamel
junction was not imaged.
To date, the access by the RCM commercially available
was unfortunately limited to the vestibular surface of the
upper central incisors because of the ergonomics of the
device, born for skin imaging in dermatology. Indeed,
further efforts must be made to optimize the device ergo-
nomics thus allowing the examination of all anatomical
dental surfaces, until the third molars. RCM teeth evalua-
tion also presented penetration limits through dental deeper
layers because of light backscattering due to superficial
enamel hyper-refractivity.
Despite these limitations, the preliminary results on
RCM dental surface imaging encourage carrying out a
more extended study in vivo on teeth. This technology
could offer support to clinical management of patients with
dental diseases or damages and could help to understand
in vivo the damages related to etching and bracketing. In
the clinical practice, a number of different situations
require the removal of a thin layer of enamel and some-
times it is cut-off by traumatic or iatrogenic causes. The
in vivo study of the effects of several substances on enamel
surfaces could help industries to produce less harmful
materials to teeth and gives the opportunity to identify and
exploit the effects of rotary tools on enamel, thus allowing
for a correct finishing technique.
The present work was a feasibility study developed to
establish the capability of a reflectance confocal micro-
scope commercially available for in vivo skin imaging to
in vivo image enamel tissue. The preliminary results invite
further experiments aimed to define our knowledge about
in vivo damages after etching treatments, or bracket
removal and the responsiveness to fluoride seals and the
morphology of the tooth/restoration interface, as well for
imaging the oral mucosae. Moreover, this device could also
be used to detect relevant diseases like caries, or to assess
surface properties to evaluate lesion activity [14, 15].
Nevertheless, studies on pathological conditions affect-
ing the teeth are justified and possible. Obviously, further
efforts must be done to improve the device, thus allowing
to image also other dental surfaces such as the occlusal and
palatal ones, and all types of teeth.
In conclusion, RCM appears to be a good auxiliary
device for investigating in vivo the microscopic architec-
ture and features of enamel by a non-invasive way and a
real-time response, thus dramatically reducing the timing
of the dental imaging and obtaining microscopic details of
the living tissues with no need for teeth extraction.
Odontology
123
Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict
of interest.
References
1. Lucchese A, Pilolli GP, Petruzzi M, Crincoli V, Scivetti M, Favia
G. Analysis of collagen distribution in human crown dentin by
confocal laser scanning microscopy. Ultrastruct Pathol. 2008;
32:107–11.
2. Alessandri Bonetti G, Zanarini M, Incerti Parenti S, Lattuca M,
Marchionni S, Gatto MR. Evaluation of enamel surfaces after
bracket debonding: an in vivo study with scanning electron
microscopy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;140:696–702.
3. Makishi P, Shimada Y, Sadr A, Tagami J, Sumi Y. Non-
destructive 3D imaging of composite restorations using optical
coherence tomography: marginal adaptation of self-etch adhe-
sives. J Dent. 2011;39:316–25.
4. Tovey SC, Brighton PJ, Willars GB. Confocal microscopy: the-
ory and applications for cellular signaling. Methods Mol Biol.
2006;312:57–85.
5. Lucchese A, Scivetti M, Pilolli GP, Favia G. Analysis of ghost
cells in calcifying cystic odontogenic tumors by confocal laser
scanning microscopy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral
Radiol Endod. 2007;104:391–4.
6. Watson TF, Petroll WM, Cavanagh HD, Jester JV. In vivo con-
focal microscopy in clinical dental research: an initial appraisal.
J Dent. 1992;20:352–8.
7. Burmeister M, von Schwanewede H, Stave J, Guthoff RF.
Intraoral diagnostics using confocal laser scanning microscopy.
Biomed Tech. 2009;54:23–8.
8. Ogaard B, Duschner H, Ruben J, Arends J. Microradiography and
confocal laser scanning microscopy applied to enamel lesions
formed in vivo with and without fluoride varnish treatment. Eur J
Oral Sci. 1996;104:378–83.
9. Moscarella E, Gonzalez S, Agozzino M, Sanchez-Mateos JL,
Panetta C, Contaldo M, Ardigo M. Pilot study on reflectance
confocal microscopy imaging of lichen planus: a real-time, non-
invasive aid for clinical diagnosis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Vene-
reol. 2012;26:1258–65.
10. Contaldo M, Agozzino M, Moscarella E, Esposito S, Serpico R,
Ardigo M. In vivo characterization of healthy oral mucosa by
Reflectance Confocal Microscopy (RCM): a translational
research for optical biopsy. Ultrastruct Pathol. 2013;37(2).
11. Agozzino M, Tosti A, Barbieri L, Moscarella E, Cota C, Ber-
ardesca E, Ardigo M. Confocal microscopic features of scarring
alopecia: preliminary report. Br J Dermatol. 2011;165:534–40.
12. Luedtke MA, Papazoglou E, Neidrauer M, Kollias N. Wave-
length effects on contrast observed with reflectance in vivo
confocal laser scanning microscopy. Skin Res Technol. 2009;
15:482–8.
13. Gareau DS, Jeon H, Nehal KS, Rajadhyaksha M. Rapid screening
of cancer margins in tissue with multimodal confocal micros-
copy. J Surg Res. 2012;178:533–8. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2012.05.059.
14. Neuhaus KW, Nyvad B, Lussi A, Jaruszewski L. Evaluation of
perpendicular reflection intensity for assessment of caries lesion
activity/inactivity. Caries Res. 2011;45:408–14.
15. Jaruszewski L. Differentiation of enamel lesion activity by ver-
tical reflection intensity—a methodical description. Biomed
Tech. 2012;57:139–47.
Odontology
123